Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Esperanto
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
NARRATOR: Ancient structures built
with enormous stone blocks.
Solid granite cut with laser-like precision.
And accounts of astounding technological capabilities.
For nearly two decades,
Ancient Aliens has traveled the globe
exploring towering megalithic structures,
mysterious artifacts,
and stories of otherworldly beings
in a quest for evidence
that might reveal the truth of our extraterrestrial origins.
A lot of these sites that we've featured,
most people haven't even heard about beforehand.
NARRATOR: Now, we take a look back through the Ancient Aliens archives
to the show's very origins,
to examine the evidence that we are not alone.
We have never been alone.
♪ ♪
How cool is it to be able to look back
ten, 11, 15 years ago
of Ancient Aliens?
We know have
about 300 hours
worth of content.
Yeah, it just goes to show you just how much evidence
there is for ancient astronaut theory.
And what strikes me as I look back over the years
is the number of fields that the evidence crosses through,
from art, religion, archaeology, astronomy,
-mythology... -JASON MARTELL: And engineering.
I-I love that "wow" factor
when we look at a lot of the sites like Sacsayhuamán,
Göbekli Tepe, Baalbek,
we have to wonder how they could stack
hundred-ton stones perfectly.
Yeah, and that is one of the reasons
why ancient engineering was one of the first topics
that we covered on Ancient Aliens.
And starting with the Pyramids of Giza.
Yeah. No, look, by now, it's clear that we've all aged
-like fine wine. -(chuckles)
But the great Pyramids of Giza have retained
their magnificence for thousands of years.
And it's all just as mystifying and exciting
as it was at the time.
NARRATOR: In today's largest construction sites
and quarries,
huge megamachines are used to dig,
cut and lift stone.
These man-made creatures dwarf their creators
and perform the work of thousands of men
using modern hydraulic technologies.
Without such equipment,
builders could never construct modern skyscrapers.
Yet, thousands of years ago,
ancient civilizations were accomplishing the same work
while constructing their monuments and temples
using massive stones.
These enormous blocks--
many weighing in excess of 100 tons--
would be a challenge even for today's engineers.
Yet, thousands of years ago,
people cut them out of solid rock,
transported them for miles
and then lifted them precisely into place.
But how?
Did they cut these massive stone blocks with hammers, chisels,
and copper wire, as mainstream archeologists suggest?
Could they have lifted and transported them
without a pulley system, or the wheel?
Or did ancient civilizations possess advanced technologies
that have since been lost to science?
ROBERT BAUVAL: At Giza, you just don't have the pyramids.
Linked to the pyramids are
what Egyptologists call valley temples.
It doesn't take a rocket engineer
that when you go there,
there's something not quite right here.
Whereas the pyramids are built with blocks
of two to three tons,
these temples,
which are minute compared to the pyramids,
are built with blocks of 100 tons
and some of them 200 tons.
Let me tell you what a 100-ton block is.
If you take a 100 family cars
and you squeeze them together, you get one of these blocks.
First of all-- let alone how they move these blocks--
is why would they want to use 100-ton blocks?
It simply doesn't make sense.
♪ ♪
There's no reason for them
to want to build out of granite blocks
the size of a semitruck.
It's like "Okay, let's do something,
but let's do it as difficult as we could possibly do it."
The reason why I am convinced
that sophisticated technology was utilized
in these ancient rocks is because
if we go to a stone quarry today
and look at the scope of machinery required
to accomplish similar things,
those machines are huge.
NARRATOR: Subscribers to ancient alien theory
do not believe extraterrestrials built these amazing monuments
but instead provided some type of technological know-how
or tools to our ancestors.
Engineering expert Chris Dunn has spent several decades
researching the construction tools used
by the ancient Egyptians.
We're normally taught by Egyptologists
that the ancient Egyptians had simple tools.
They went to work every day using stone balls,
copper chisels or copper tube
and sand to-to grind holes in,
in diorite and granite, extremely hard rock.
From what I have actually gathered over the years,
is information that seems to actually argue
against that notion that they had simple tools.
NARRATOR: In Egypt, Dunn was able
to examine ancient sites firsthand.
What he found has proved
to be both revolutionary and controversial.
DUNN: If you look at the Giza Plateau
and all the stones
that they actually placed in the Great Pyramid
and Khafre's pyramid, Menkaure's pyramid,
two and a half million blocks of stone
in the Great Pyramid alone.
They had to have some efficient means
of cutting them to size and putting them into place.
They had to have had somebody on site
who's saying, "Okay, I need a block this size."
And then getting a block to them that size.
Stat. Like, immediately.
NARRATOR: While searching several miles north of Giza at Abu Rawash,
Dunn stumbled upon a clue when he spotted a granite block
containing a deep cut.
DUNN: When I first saw it, I just didn't know what to make of it.
And it was only after
puzzling over it for days,
and sometimes waking up at 3:00 in the morning
scratching my head and thinking,
"Well, how did they make this cut?"
And finally to realize that the only way
that they could have actually cut that thing was
with a saw that was 35 feet in diameter.
The idea that ancient Egyptians used giant saws
provoked much resistance from mainstream archeologists.
Dunn, however, was convinced.
As an ex-machinist, I look for tool marks.
I look for them everywhere I go,
and I could be accused of, "Well, you know,
"if you're gonna look for something,
"you're probably gonna find it because you're looking at it
through a certain filter."
Accepted, I agree.
But the question is, why is it there?
Clearly, to me, that is a machine mark.
But there were no machines back then.
So, what-what do I do?
I just go looking for more machine marks
and-and they're all over the place.
♪ ♪
You find them on statues,
you'll find them, particularly, in the Luxor Museum.
There seems to be an impression
on the side of Amon's buttock
where it meets the bench...
...where there is an undercut.
It was a slip of a tool.
And, therefore, it must have been
a tool that was quite efficient.
NARRATOR: Dunn also believes
that the large depressions in the ground at Giza
are not boat pits--
as is claimed by mainstream archeologists--
but were actually used to hold the 35-foot saws.
I speculate that they were actually saw pits.
The saws were mounted in these pits
and that they ran the blocks through the saws
before they put them in the Great Pyramid.
Another mystery involves how mega stones were lifted up
and placed into a precise position.
What you find in modern construction is
that to build big buildings,
you need to build big instruments,
which help build these big buildings.
And that is something
which archaeology has never addressed.
NARRATOR: The three largest man-made stones in the world
are found at The Temple of Jupiter at Baalbek in Lebanon.
Each weighs an estimated 1,000 tons
or two million pounds.
A nearby quarry contains an even bigger stone
known as the Stone of the Pregnant Woman.
This giant rectangular block weighs an incredible 1,200 tons.
To move it today would take the strength
of 21 heavy lift cranes.
PETER PALUTIKOF: Being in the construction industry,
if a certain project is being constructed somewhere,
particularly in mountainous areas,
how would we carry this machinery?
These cranes and all that?
They are so heavy that it is virtually impossible
to take them to the site.
ROGER HOPKINS: This stone came off of a,
a project in Palm Springs, where they were...
had one of the largest excavators
they could rent.
They had trouble loading it into the truck.
It's well in excess of five tons,
ten thousand pounds.
Small in megalithic terms,
but basically
what we can handle with modern machinery.
We're supposed to accept
that the people who built the pyramids
did not have the wheel, did not have the pulley,
did not have iron, in fact, they had nothing.
With brutal manpower and pieces of strings,
the context does not fit the evidence.
NARRATOR: Ancient man's method
of moving large blocks is only one mystery.
Another surrounds the techniques of their stonemasons.
How did pre-historic civilizations
cut such intricately designed patterns in solid granite?
NARRATOR: Master stonemason and sculptor Roger Hopkins
uses a variety of advanced tools to cut and shape hard stones.
Powered implements such as diamond-tipped wires
and polishers enable him to fashion works of art
out of huge granite blocks obtained from nearby quarries.
Yet even with these high-tech tools,
Hopkins cannot replicate what ancient civilizations
accomplished thousands of years ago.
Could these advanced engineering methods
be the smoking gun that proves
humans had help from alien beings?
HOPKINS: The precision on some of the work that I have seen
is just incredible.
It's possible to do by hand,
but it'd take an incredible amount of time.
Plus, you have to have years of experience
to be able to pull it off.
TSOUKALOS: In my opinion, the most tangible pieces
of evidence that we have
regarding possible extraterrestrial technology
is when we look at the ancient
stonecutting techniques.
Because, in some instances,
we ourselves today could not replicate
what our ancestors allegedly accomplished
with stonemasonry.
NARRATOR: Puma Punku is a large temple complex
located on a high plateau in Bolivia.
(sheep bleating)
Mainstream archaeologists date the site
from approximately 200 BC.
The people who lived here had neither a written language
nor the wheel, yet somehow
they built one of the world's most complex structures.
Ancient alien theorists view Puma Punku
as clear proof of extraterrestrial influence.
TSOUKALOS: The ruins we find at Puma Punku are simply
extraordinary.
Puma Punku defies logic.
COPPENS: The interest of Puma Punku is not so much
that the individual stones sorted together perfectly,
but the fact that the stones,
as such, are of such tremendous design
that it requires concepts of mathematics
which are far beyond anything we are actually using right now.
Yet somehow, in the past,
somebody has made that for a specific purpose.
And in a way which even computer programs today
would kind of go, "How is this possible?"
TSOUKALOS: In the highlands of Bolivia, Puma Punku,
some of these blocks are over 40 to 50 tons each.
What can you tell us about this?
HOPKINS: Boy, they, they had
their, uh, stonecutting abilities,
you know, pretty well fine-tuned for 5,000 years old.
I mean, uh... it's almost unbelievable.
But the-- these cutting planes
that they have on here are very impressive.
And some of the incised cuts.
See, like in-in here,
all these interior cuts?
-Very hard to do. -TSOUKALOS: Mm-hmm.
HOPKINS: I mean, it would be difficult
for us with the-- our equipment
to get that kind of precision.
TSOUKALOS: Let's talk a little bit about
-inside boxes. -Ooh.
I was afraid you were gonna pull something like this on me.
That is a hell of a piece of work.
I mean, if we were to do something like that today,
we'd use what they have--
these, uh, computer-driven
CNC machines which are-- have diamond tips and,
uh, you have a template that, you know, the computer follows.
And even then, it may not come out as perfect.
Because even though you can tell that, obviously,
this piece broke off...
-HOPKINS: Mm-hmm. -...nowhere in here
can you see any imperfection.
It's like-- and by the way, when you're there,
if you go with your finger over these edges,
and you put a little pressure on your fingertip,
you can cut yourself.
This is how sharp the edges are.
NARRATOR: But where could the ancient peoples
have developed such technology?
Is it really possible that extraterrestrial visitors
provided different construction methods and tools?
When I saw these blocks,
I didn't really think that they were cut.
The first thing really that I thought of was
this appears very similar to Frank Lloyd Wright's
textile block system of construction,
which he used in his California houses
in the early 1920s.
Now, what he did was
he took concrete, poured it into molds.
There actually are ancient Incan legends
that suggest that they had the capability
of softening the stone.
At Sacsayhuamán, for example,
we find these gigantic stone blocks,
gigantic stone walls,
where it looks as if those stones were molten,
put into place,
and then the stone hardened again.
NARRATOR: Several hundred miles north of Puma Punku,
Machu Picchu sits high atop the Peruvian Andes.
Built by the Incas in the 15th century,
this stone citadel
was suddenly abandoned about 100 years later.
Like Puma Punku, Machu Picchu also has signs
of advanced engineering
and possibly molded stones.
DUNN: I can't help but think that whoever was behind this,
thought the process through from beginning to end.
They didn't quarry the rock and then decide,
"How the heck are we gonna transport this?"
They knew, from beginning to end, what needed to be done
with whatever techniques and technology
they were going to use.
So that this was no big deal.
In industry today, there's a... kind of an adage:
"Keep it simple, stupid."
NARRATOR: Based on his experience,
Mike Dunn believes the simplest way
to build the great walls of Machu Picchu would have been
to transport small rocks to the site,
then melt them and use molds to fashion
the exact size and shape needed.
MICHAEL DUNN: That would solve a lot
of difficulties of constructing this wall first.
You have your shapes, all the same size.
Each shape.
So you're guaranteed that they would fit together,
as opposed to being cut by different artisans.
HOPKINS: Melting the rocks, and then pouring them
into place would take an incredible amount of heat
just to spall off pieces of stone.
I have a-a stone torch,
which I use for sometimes shaping granite.
And, I mean, it generates a temperature of--
in excess of 3,000 degrees.
3,000 degrees.
That's a lot.
MICHAEL DUNN: When we look back at the ancients,
and we see a technology that they couldn't possibly know...
...there's only two possibilities:
that either God did it,
which we really don't think happened,
or some high-tech civilization
from another planet came and showed them how to do it.
Then took their materials and tools and went back home.
The idea behind that is that
none of these ancient monuments were constructed
or manufactured by extraterrestrials.
It was us, humans, who built it
with extraterrestrial technology.
HOPKINS: It's entirely possible that there were visitations.
That they pointed out ways to do things,
and that they wanted to leave some kind of a record.
And, I mean, if you're gonna leave a permanent record,
the only way you can do that is in stone.
There must have been thousands of ancient structures
made of mud and wood
that we'll never know existed.
But when you build with stone, that's for the ages.
-Mm-hmm. -And stone is much harder
to work with and build structures,
especially megalithic stones.
HENRY: Right, and these massive
stones were transported, in many cases,
from miles and miles away.
Yeah, and that is one of the smoking guns
of the ancient astronaut theory: transportation,
and also the stonework.
I mean some of, the stonework is so perfect
you can't even put a dollar bill
in between the fittings.
NARRATOR: Peru,
home of the world's longest mountain range,
the Andes,
the spine of South America.
Here, in a high river valley,
among peaks towering over 20,000 feet,
the Inca established
their capital city of Cuzco,
which thrived for over 300 years...
...until Spanish conquistadors
arrived in the 16th century.
Above Cuzco, at an elevation
of more than 12,000 feet,
looms the ancient fortress of Sacsayhuamán,
whose immense stone walls
may hold secrets which pre-date the Inca themselves.
GRAHAM HANCOCK: My feeling, very strong feeling,
is that we're looking at
a two-phase, uh, construction site
in many of the so-called, uh, Inca stone monuments.
And that the Inca structures
sit on top of much more ancient
rock-cut structures and megalithic structures
that we just don't know who built them.
And this actually fits with the Inca's own view.
NARRATOR: Like many Inca sites, Sacsayhuamán features
astonishing stonework,
but not all of it credited to the Inca.
According to conventional archaeology,
the Killke culture built the older sections of the site
approximately 1,000 years ago.
But the Inca themselves
believed the site was constructed
by an earlier, unnamed race of people
led by a powerful god
who descended from the skies.
MARTELL: Throughout time, there has been witness
to a god named Viracocha
that visited the South American people,
and blessed them and gave them all types of technology.
And some of his physical characteristics
make him stand out from the indigenous population
because he was a very tall,
pale-skinned, white-haired being.
But did this god Viracocha actually exist?
Could he have been, as ancient astronaut theorists suggest,
a visitor from an alien world?
If so, it might help to explain
just how the ancient site was constructed.
This rock weighs about 20 tons.
This is miniscule compared to many of the rocks
at Sacsayhuamán.
Today, we have heavy machinery to move such stones,
but in the ancient times, especially the Inca,
they would've used massive human work forces
working for massive amounts of time.
A rule of thumb is it takes about ten to 20 men
to move a one-ton rock.
So when you're talking hundreds of tons,
you're talking thousands of men.
CHILDRESS: What we see is a culture
who have got the technology
to quarry giant blocks of stone,
move them to, uh, the site where they want to build,
and then, to stack and cut
and articulate these massive blocks
into, in some cases, almost indestructible structure.
Talk about granite, you're talking about
a composition of feldspar, mica and quartz,
so you'd need diamond to actually abrade it or cut it.
We would use diamond today to cut granite.
Those are the kind of discoveries that lead one
to question whether they were really
using the tools in the ancient toolbox,
or whether there was something else at work.
NARRATOR: Shaman Jorge Delgado has spent most of his life
studying the mysterious structures of Peru,
many built prior to the rise of the Inca Empire.
JORGE DELGADO: It's amazing, all the weight of the stones.
You know? It's, uh, difficult,
definitely, for any human to move, even in groups.
And the other aspect is the-- how it's put together.
In some stones, we will see, still now,
there is, like, some marks that it seems that it was dissolved.
HANCOCK: The walls are put together with blocks of stone
weighing 50 or 100 tons,
cut and shaped like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle,
so that they lock together so tightly
that you can't even get a sheet of paper between them.
There are signs in many of these stones
that show very large amounts of thermal heat
have been applied to mold the stones
in such a way that they fit perfectly.
And so, it really does raise a lot of questions.
TSOUKALOS: If you look at the style
the Sacsayhuamán wall was built,
the blocks look as if they've been molded like putty.
If you can mold stone into place,
then all of a sudden,
as crazy as this sounds,
it makes more sense because
there is no mortar that has been used.
NARRATOR: According to local legend,
a bird was responsible for the seamless construction.
Legends say the winged creature
carried a powerful chemical in its beak,
a substance capable of melting stone.
DELGADO: Sacsayhuamán means,
the head of the falcon.
"Falcon's head."
But, maybe was some falcons,
or maybe some bird people,
who could connect with the place.
NARRATOR: But is it possible,
as ancient astronaut theorists suggest,
that the mythical bird
might actually have been a spacecraft,
piloted by alien visitors
known to the locals as "space brothers"?
DELGADO: I believe that it's a combination
of the space brothers' technology
with other kind of possibilities.
Nowadays, we know different kind of tools.
We didn't had before, these kind of tools.
Or maybe we had more sophisticated.
So, the thing is that this place, Sacsayhuamán,
it continues as a mystery.
MARTELL: So, looking at all of these sites
with these perfectly stacked stones,
we're looking at a type of technology that's not used
anywhere else on Earth.
I don't discount human ingenuity,
but that type of engineering,
that we still can't duplicate today,
must raise a flag for further consideration.
It's almost extraterrestrial in a sense.
Someone had to have taught them these techniques.
NARRATOR: But whether the process of forming the large
megalithic stones involved the use of thermal energy,
or a mysterious chemical,
one thing is certain.
The ancient builders used the technique on a vast scale.
But why?
What was the intended purpose of creating
such intricately-built stone structures?
MARTELL: So, we can't really give an answer as to
what they were being used for other than
we know that the extraterrestrials,
more than likely, are the source
of what they call "gods."
How did they get here?
More than likely, in some type of craft.
And very possibly, they could've been
using these large megaliths as platforms to land on.
NARRATOR: But if Sacsayhuamán was, in fact,
constructed by alien visitors,
might there be additional evidence
of their time on Earth
at other ancient sites around the world?
Perhaps there is.
When we talk about megalithic sites in Peru,
we really have to include Puma Punku
just to the south in Bolivia.
Yeah, and as any fan of Ancient Aliens knows by now,
Puma Punku is, by far,
my most favorite place in order to illustrate
the ancient astronaut theory because
Puma Punku is unparalleled on Earth.
There is no other place like Puma Punku.
I remember, in 2013, we did an episode
where we sent David Childress there...
-Yes. -HENRY: Yeah. -...on location,
and he's, you know, examining the blocks,
and it's interesting to see how those blocks
fit together so perfectly in the past,
but today, the blocks are scattered
-all over that location. -That's right.
Yeah, but even in ruins,
it is clear that that place
was an incredible ancient piece
of magnificent engineering.
NARRATOR: Bolivia, South America.
Here, 45 miles west of La Paz,
isolated high in the Andes Mountains,
lie the mysterious ancient ruins of Puma Punku.
Spread across a desert plateau
at an altitude over 12,000 feet,
the megalithic stones found here
are among the largest on the planet...
...measuring up to 26 feet long
and weighing more than 100 tons each.
These are the mysterious ruins of Puma Punku,
nearly 13,000 feet
in the Altiplano of Bolivia.
What you have here
are massive blocks of granite
scattered like some kid's toy blocks
around the site.
It's like some giant cataclysm
just wiped out this entire area.
Archaeologists are baffled by what Puma Punku was,
how it looked and what the purpose
of this enormous structure would have been.
NARRATOR: Mainstream scientists believe
the site was originally constructed
about 2,000 years ago.
But in 1945,
archaeologist Arthur Posnansky proposed
that Puma Punku was much, much older.
By examining the structures and what he believed were
their original alignment with the stars,
he dated the ruins to 15,000 BC.
HUGH NEWMAN: Arthur Posnansky was a researcher.
He was part Bolivian,
and he worked at the site for many decades
and he concluded that the site must've been built
about 17,000 years ago
by studying the archeoastronomy of that particular site.
COPPENS: We don't know how old Puma Punku is.
We have had some circumstantial dating,
but we have been unable
to date the stones of Puma Punku themselves.
They could be thousands,
if not hundreds of thousands of years old.
We don't know.
GEORGE NOORY: I think the fascinating thing
about Puma Punku is how did these structures get built?
We're talking about stone that is 25 feet high.
Stone that is hundreds of tons.
FOERSTER: Puma Punku is so unique
in the way that it was constructed
and shaped and positioned
that it is the most intriguing ancient site on the planet.
Of all the places I've ever visited,
Puma Punku is the one that I go back to
time and again
because no one can solve the mystery.
NARRATOR: Mainstream scholars believe
the andesite blocks found at Puma Punku
were formed by hand with primitive stone tools.
But some researchers point to the intricate stonework
as evidence of the use of advanced precision technology.
One of the amazing things here at Puma Punku is
the precision of the blocks.
You can see with this block of granite
that it's really been cut
at very accurate right angles.
Not only do these granite blocks have
precision corners
but they also have these difficult drill holes
that are going right through the rock.
♪ ♪
NARRATOR: But how could such primitive people,
living perhaps tens of thousands of years ago,
have produced such flawless stonework?
Might the ancient builders of Puma Punku have fabricated
the megalithic stones with advanced technology,
technology of an otherworldly origin,
as ancient astronaut theorists believe?
If you look at the stones carefully
and you get a magnifying glass on some of them,
you can see some intricate stonework,
as though they're using machine tools
or even lasers.
It's absolutely incredible.
I've seen nothing like it anywhere on the planet.
When an architect or an engineer looks at Puma Punku,
one thing jumps out immediately...
that whoever built this place
had knowledge of planning, of logistics,
and had access to advanced technology.
You know, Brien, this is one of the most interesting
and unusual stones
here at Puma Punku.
It's got these perfect right angles.
And then, each of these small drill holes are
basically evenly spaced along this routed groove.
To me, it's clear that power tools have been used
on this unusual block of stone here.
Well, exactly. And this surface is as smooth as a tabletop,
like in your kitchen.
There's no wave to it or anything.
It's-- This was machined.
But who machined it?
It's an astonishing piece of work.
And how anyone could think
that primitive human beings could have done this,
you know, it's just crazy.
If anything looks like ancient aliens,
it's this stone.
NARRATOR: But if otherworldly technology was used at Puma Punku,
where is the proof?
In Danville, Illinois,
machinist and toolmaker Chris Dunn
has put the Puma Punku stone
through the ultimate cutting test,
using both laser technology
and a modern diamond saw.
We've got a sample of the laser cut.
This is the diamond wheel cut.
And the top surface is the original cut surface
from Puma Punku.
So now we can compare the difference
between all three cuts.
NARRATOR: Looking at the stone under a microscope,
Dunn compares the two modern cutting techniques
with the part of the stone cut thousands of years ago.
Though age has worn the surface of the ancient example,
the comparison reveals distinct differences.
You've got vitrification on the laser cut side.
And then, of course, you've got circular tool marks
on, uh, the-the side cut with the diamond saw.
And then whatever tool they used to cut the ancient surface
must have been a different method.
Now, do you think it's possible
that some type of a diamond precision tool
was used on the old surface,
but because it was such a long time ago
that, over time, the surface became a bit more rough?
And we're talking 10,000 or even 15,000 years ago.
DUNN: That is a reasonable speculation.
I think we have to start examining, um,
a little more sophisticated tools that no longer exist.
NARRATOR: What did the ancients use
to cut the andesite stone so precisely?
Might evidence of advanced technology be found
by further study of the construction
of the Puma Punku stones?
Ancient astronaut theorists say yes
and point to what they call H-blocks.
Seems like every one of these H-blocks is exactly the same.
So it's like a prefabrication process,
where they needed x-hundred of these.
And whatever machinery it is that they had was able,
with amazing accuracy, to replicate
one after another after another.
That's very sophisticated.
CHILDRESS: Yeah, it's an ingenious way
of building a huge granite wall.
And, again, the whole thing is just so incredibly precise--
doing these kind of inside corners like this.
This-this just can't be done, really,
with-with copper chisels and-and stone hammers.
The whole thing is...
is-is just so incredibly high-tech,
even beyond what we would do today.
NARRATOR: But how could the ancients have managed to move
the incredibly heavy andesite stones to the site?
After years of research,
mainstream archaeologists have said the massive stones
were hewn at quarries over 60 miles away
and then rolled to Puma Punku on logs.
What nobody talks about is the irrefutable fact
that we are at an altitude of 12,800 feet,
which means we are above the natural tree line.
No trees ever grew in that area,
meaning no trees were cut down
in order to use wooden rollers.
-The wooden roller theory... -(snaps fingers)
...falls by the wayside.
NARRATOR: Could there have been another, more profound method
of moving these megalithic stones into place?
And if so, how could such an advanced engineering feat
have been accomplished without the help of modern machinery?
CHILDRESS: How these massive blocks of granite
were moved from their quarries and brought here to Puma Punku
would have required some kind of super technology.
Levitation and antigravity,
huge lifting vehicles--
something that ancient aliens would have had.
NARRATOR: Might the ancient city of Puma Punku
really have been built by alien beings,
as ancient astronaut theorists contend?
And if so, for what purpose?
Perhaps by piecing together the precision-cut blocks,
profound new possibilities will be revealed.
NARRATOR: January, 2011.
Researchers survey and measure the monolithic stones
and H-blocks scattered around the archeological site
of Puma Punku, hoping to solve
the mystery of what these structures were used for
and why.
TSOUKALOS: The evidence that something extraordinary
happened at Puma Punku
is in front of our very eyes,
because at Puma Punku,
we find evidence of stone cuts
that we today could only replicate
if we used the most sophisticated of technologies.
FOERSTER: That is part of the great mystery of Puma Punku.
It seems as though some kind of factory was set up there
to make these almost exactly the same.
It's almost like a Lego system of interconnecting blocks
and that is unique on this Earth.
ERICH VON DÄNIKEN: Many of the blocks
were prefabricated blocks.
Prefabricated blocks means planning.
You have to make a design.
Planning means writing.
Now the archaeologists say that Puma Punku
are the ruins of temples made by the Aymara.
Aymara are the highland Indians up there.
But the Aymara were Stone Age people.
They had not even writing.
So not planning, it's absolutely impossible.
Prefabricated blocks in Stone Age
doesn't fit with Stone Age.
And the precision of the blocks is absolutely baffling.
NARRATOR: In Danville, Illinois, toolmaker Chris Dunn
uses measurements taken at Puma Punku
to create a one-eighth-scale model of an H-block
to better understand
how they may have originally fit together.
So you actually went to Puma Punku
to measure the H-blocks.
What was your conclusion?
What did you find?
For me, it was important
to find out what the measurements were.
Uh, what I found was that the internal cavities
were not parallel to each other.
And by internal cavities,
you're referring to these two parts right here, right?
-Exactly. -Mm-hmm.
These two surfaces right here,
both top and bottom, uh,
they are smaller at the front
than they are at the back.
TSOUKALOS: Essentially suggesting a dovetail.
-DUNN: Creating a dovetail. -TSOUKALOS: Mm-hmm.
Why do you think a dovetail shape was carved or used?
Really, if we look at the way we have used dovetails,
we use them for mechanical purposes.
To hold things together.
So essentially what I'm saying is that they were
using these H-blocks for a mechanical purpose.
Probably to hold hinges for a door.
NARRATOR: To test his theory, Dunn created a door hinge
that would connect to a small-scale model H-block.
DUNN: So if we put this together, we put the one in the bottom.
Like so.
One in the top part.
Like so. And then...
this piece fits in there.
Put a hinge pin in it.
And now you have your hinge.
TSOUKALOS: Yeah, I mean, i-it's absolutely spectacular.
And of course, the most fascinating question is,
what tools were used 5,000 years ago?
Because something very sophisticated was used.
And not chicken bones.
Not chicken bones, not, uh,
copper chisels, not, uh, stone chisels.
The tools that were used to create these blocks
at Puma Punku do not exist in the archaeological record.
NARRATOR: According to Dunn,
the H-blocks may have been used to mount
hinges for a massive door,
perhaps for one of the largest temple complexes
in the ancient world.
TSOUKALOS: It's a spectacular discovery that Chris Dunn made.
This lends a whole new meaning
to the H-blocks at Puma Punku
because, possibly, they held something in place.
The question is what?
Puma Punku is definitely
one of the most mysterious sites on Earth.
And it's really clear those blocks
were made to fit together.
MARTELL: Yeah, you know but there's sites all over the world
-that still defy explanation. -Yeah.
I know one of my most favorite sites would have to be Malta.
Megalithic structures that are some of the largest on Earth.
And some of the oldest, and there's evidence
that the builders knew the science of acoustics.
And that might give us a clue
about how these megalithic sites were built.
Yeah. Possibly acoustic levitation.
NARRATOR: Malta.
A small island nation in the center of the Mediterranean Sea
just south of Italy.
Scholars believe the first inhabitants migrated here
from the nearby island of Sicily in 5200 BC.
Today, stone structures on the Maltese island of Gozo
are considered by archeologists
to be among the greatest achievements by ancient builders
anywhere in the world.
The temples on Malta and Gozo
are more than 1,000 years older than the pyramids of Egypt.
They are the earliest monumental architecture in the world.
There are engineering features
in these temples that are just astonishing.
We're talking about walls enclosing space...
paved walkways.
They were ceilinged at one time.
Definitely much more complex than anything else
that was appearing on Earth for a very long time.
NARRATOR: Built before metal tools or the wheel had been invented,
experts are baffled by the sheer scale of the construction
and the use of vertically arranged monolithic stones,
each weighing over 20 tons.
FLANAGAN: It's only been in recent years
that we've developed instruments
that are accurate enough to appreciate
that some of these ancient societies
were able to shape stones
to optical accuracy.
Optical accuracy greater than what we're able to do today.
And so they must've had some kind of advanced technology
in able to do that.
But if the ancient builders of Malta
had used advanced technology,
where did it come from?
Researchers believe answers may be found
among Malta's numerous mysteries,
including the so-called cart ruts
which can be found all over Malta.
ENEIX: These parallel incisions in the bedrock
have been identified as cart ruts
because that's what they look like.
What they really were,
what their purpose was,
we don't know.
There's nothing written.
ARLAN ANDREWS: The cart ruts on Malta
are about four feet wide.
They're uniformly spaced.
Some of-of them run hundreds of yards.
Some of them run miles.
According to the studies on them,
they probably were there up to 10,000 years ago,
because some of the ancient temples
are built right on top of the, uh, ruts.
NARRATOR: Ancient astronaut theorists believe
the cart ruts may in fact be evidence
that Malta was one of Earth's earliest industrial work sites.
It seems like what these cart ruts really were
was some kind of ancient, uh, railway.
And this railway was then to move heavy machinery,
much as we would use today in a mining operation.
Even the way rockets are rolled out onto a launchpad.
NARRATOR: Further evidence of the use of advanced technology on Malta
can be found underground.
In 1902, construction workers,
while building the foundation for several houses,
accidentally discovered
a mysterious underground sanctuary
dating to 2500 BC.
Called the Hypogeum,
the subterranean structure
was revealed to be three levels deep,
all hewn from solid stone.
ENEIX: It's been estimated that they removed
more than 2,000 tons of stone from these subterranean chambers
to create a space that beautifully replicates
the temples aboveground.
NARRATOR: Perhaps one of the greatest mysteries
concerning the Hypogeum
involve the acoustical properties
in what is called the Oracle Room.
ANDREW COLLINS: The acoustical properties within this
are absolutely extraordinary,
because what happens is the-- if a person
is within the Oracle Room,
the-the way that their voice is carried
is heard within the whole of the complex.
HENRY: The ancients were using this profound sound technology
in order to put themselves into a deep state of trance
in order to access higher human consciousness.
They wanted to go deep within
in order to connect themselves with star energy.
NARRATOR: Might the Oracle Room have been used
to communicate with ancient gods...
...or perhaps celestial ancestors?
Or do its advanced acoustics suggest
that early Maltese people
had mastered the science of sonic manipulation,
the ability to manipulate solid matter
through audio frequencies?
FLANAGAN: One of the main things that I've realized
is that they're using something
called fractal nonlinear resonance.
And we're now discovering in the field of material science
that nonlinear resonances of sound waves,
microwaves, magnetic waves,
that we are able to actually change matter in ways
that we never dreamed possible.
NARRATOR: If the Oracle Room
was used to harness the power of audio waves,
as many ancient astronaut theorists believe,
is it possible the prehistoric builders
used sonic technology
to help build Malta's mammoth temples?
CHILDRESS: The builders had this advanced knowledge
of sonic technology.
And in fact,
sound technology can be used
for all kinds of applications,
including levitation, or antigravity.
COLLINS: All around the world,
there are myths and legends
relating to how large structures,
um, came into being.
They talk about the movement of stones
through the use of sound,
about the use of instruments,
or-or the banging, the ringing,
that will elevate stones enough so that they can be pushed
as if they've become completely weightless.
CHILDRESS: It would appear that the builders at Malta
had very advanced knowledge of things
we're just now discovering.
And you would think that they got this knowledge
from extraterrestrials.
It's very possible that what we're seeing at Malta
is some type of sound levitation technology.
And if that's true, there's many other sites
that may have been built in a similar fashion.
Right, because our ancestors
were all taught by the same teachers.
Now, if we really want to talk about acoustic levitation,
then one place comes to mind, and that's Nan Madol.
Which is truly extraordinary
because you have these giant basalt structures
in the middle of nowhere in the ocean on tiny, tiny islands.
HENRY: Yeah, I remember when we first featured it on the show,
and the locals actually said that those giant basalt columns
were actually floated through the air.
Yes, and I got to listen to these accounts firsthand
when I visited Nan Madol with David Childress
a few years later.
And, uh, let me tell you, the moment that you stand
in front of Nan Madol, in person,
it just blows your mind.
NARRATOR: The island of Pohnpei.
More than 2,500 miles southwest of Hawai'i,
completely isolated in the Pacific Ocean,
this Micronesian landmass is home to just 34,000 people,
mainly farmers and fishermen.
But there is one area of the island
that is completely uninhabited:
the lost city of Nan Madol.
The native islanders believe this ancient site is cursed...
and it is also home to some of the most mysterious
archaeological ruins in the world.
Built on a coral reef just off the eastern coast of Pohnpei
and sprawling more than 200 acres,
Nan Madol consists of 92 smaller man-made islands
connected by canals.
According to historians, this ancient city,
often called the "Venice of the Pacific,"
was the capital of the Saudeleur dynasty
that ruled from about 500 to 1628 AD.
BEARDSLEY: This ancient city housed the Saudeleurs,
the kings of that time.
So, it has their houses,
it has feasting areas, it has tombs.
So there's a whole number of areas
that each of these islets supported.
NARRATOR: Most archaeologists agree
that construction of these artificial islands
began sometime in the 13th century.
Each has been formed with columnar basalt,
a black rock that forms
when basaltic lava from a volcano
cools in the form of columns.
There are a number of columnar basalt outflows
across Pohnpei itself.
And we know of several of these outcrops
that were used to mine the basalt.
They were then transported to the area of Nan Madol
and then placed to create these small islets.
NARRATOR: But how did the native people living here 800 years ago
manage to build 92 islets out of giant basalt columns?
Researchers estimate that each stone log
used to construct the megalithic structures
weighs between five to 50 tons.
Stacked to form walls as high as 25 feet tall
and 17 feet thick,
archaeologists believe that it was an undertaking
that most likely would have required
all 25,000 island inhabitants to complete.
Around the ruins of Nan Madol are many canals,
which researchers and archeologists say
were the routes taken by boats to move these basalt columns
across and around the island
to construct the huge megalithic site.
NARRATOR: Mainstream scholars insist native people built Nan Madol
using ropes, rollers and rafts,
but attempts to prove this theory have failed.
BEARDSLEY: So, if you add up all of the stone logs,
you have a weight of 750,000 or so metric tons.
That's a lot.
If you were to move maybe
2,000 tons a year,
you might be able to get it built
over about three centuries.
We're talking about a major, massive effort here.
The kind of effort that you would see
in the construction of the pyramids in Egypt.
NARRATOR: But could there be another explanation
for how these ancient people were able to move
such massive rocks miles across the island
and into place in the ocean
without the help of modern machinery?
According to local legends,
the ancient builders
used a much more profound method of construction,
an advanced antigravitational technology
that ancient astronaut theorists believe
may explain many of the world's mysterious megalithic sites.
Some legends state that the stones were actually flown
from one part of the island to another,
or levitated some way to get them up
to such high areas of the main construction.
BRAD OLSEN: This is very reminiscent of what researchers call
auditive levitation, which was a technique
of raising heavy stones by matching
the sound frequency of matter,
rendering it weightless
and moving it into place.
TSOUKALOS: The people themselves,
who still, to this day, live there in Pohnpei, say
that this place "was not built by us.
It's been here before we arrived."
TSOUKALOS: Man, oh, man.
I mean, look how tall that is.
NARRATOR: While visiting the ancient site of Nan Madol,
ancient astronaut theorists Giorgio Tsoukalos
and David Childress,
along with their guide Gus Kohler
and structural engineer Dr. Henry Burton,
have traveled to the site of Nandauwas,
the royal mortuary said to belong
to Nan Madol's original builders.
This is supposed to be the biggest stone here
-at Nandauwas. -This corner stone right here?
This thing, it's-it's supposed to be the biggest of all
-the stones here. -TSOUKALOS: Henry,
do you think you can calculate the weight of this?
Yeah, we can certainly estimate it.
Um, I have a measuring tape, we can estimate the volume,
and we know the density, so that can give us the mass.
All right, let's do that.
BURTON: Yeah, so, this is about four meters.
All right, here's, uh, the far corner here.
NARRATOR: Using the dimensions and the density
of one of the basalt stone blocks,
Dr. Burton calculates its weight.
TSOUKALOS: 250. Two meters, 50.
BURTON: All right, so based on the measurements,
you're looking at a weight of about 54 tons.
-54 tons? -Yeah, so 50 tons, give or take.
And you have one, two, three, four
of those monoliths essentially stacked on top of each other...
-BURTON: Mm-hmm. -...at a height of 40 feet?
CHILDRESS: So, Gus, what is, then, the oral history
of moving this stone on the island?
Well, according to the legends, uh,
the stones were flown up here.
NARRATOR: For generations,
the people of Pohnpei have told the story
that Nan Madol was constructed by strange visitors
through a process of levitation.
It is this legend that has suggested
to ancient astronaut theorists
that Nan Madol is not only an ancient megalithic structure,
it is also an extraterrestrial one.
We have in the oral traditions
story about two brothers...
NARRATOR: According to legend,
the twin sorcerers who created Nan Madol
were of giant proportions,
much like the legends
of Easter Island, where it is said
that giants magically floated
the stone Moai statues into place.
Similar stories involving levitation are associated
with numerous other megalithic sights
like Stonehenge in England,
the Great Pyramid in Giza, Egypt,
the Uxmal Pyramid in the Yucatán Peninsula
and Puma Punku in Bolivia.
There are other stories around the world
that say the exact same thing...
...how gigantic stones were moved into place as if by magic.
And you have to ask yourself, is there a connection?
Did all of our ancestors receive
the same knowledge from the extraterrestrials?
And the answer to that is a resounding yes.
Okay.
CHILDRESS: They don't know.
I think they don't know where it came from.
-TSOUKALOS: Aha! -But it's-it's not from here, right?
So, yeah, 60% of the stones, they don't know
-where they came from. -That's incredible. That...
the 60% is essentially still a mystery, yes?
Huh.
NARRATOR: For decades, mainstream archaeologists have been
frustrated by their failure to identify the source
for much of the basalt used
in the construction of Nan Madol.
But recently, a growing number of scientists have
become convinced that it came from a volcanic outcropping
located 25 miles northeast of Nan Madol
called Pwisehn Malek.
The unusual formation extends over 400 feet into the air,
and, incredibly, the rock used to construct Nan Madol
appears to have been extracted
from the least accessible part of the mountain:
the very top.
But how?
According to the oral history of Pohnpei,
the basalt was taken by what the natives referred to
as "a giant bird."
There's one story that says that at some point
there were these giant roosters
that lived on top of that mountain.
And this rooster took
these basalt blocks and flew them over to Nan Madol.
Now, monster roosters do not exist.
So my mind always goes to misunderstood technology.
Machines that were provided by the extraterrestrials.
CHILDRESS: I believe that the islanders are correct
when they say all those stones were flown through the air,
because I can't see how it was done in any other way.
NARRATOR: As far as ancient astronaut theorists are concerned,
the local legends, along with hard evidence
that basalt appears to have been excavated
from the top of Pwisehn Malek,
add credence to the idea
that advanced alien technology was used
in the construction of Nan Madol.
And to help prove their theory,
Giorgio Tsoukalos and David Childress,
along with structural engineer Dr. Henry Burton,
travel 25 miles across the island
to visit the nearest basalt quarry.
TSOUKALOS: Man, look at this.
-BURTON: Wow. -TSOUKALOS: What a quarry.
So, how does one free the basalt from, from this wall?
Yeah, no, it-it would, it would certainly require
some specialized tools,
some type of excavator,
some type of drill tip.
And once you start taking rocks off,
depending on how much room
you have to drive things up, depending on the size
of the blocks, you might need a crane
to sort of move things around.
You would need some type of machinery
to be able to do that today.
TSOUKALOS: How did people
from at least a thousand years ago
remove these blocks from this quarry?
CHILDRESS: They had to somehow
pry these columns out of the cliff,
and, you know, remove them
so that they would be, yeah, stand-alone
piece of prismatic basalt
and then, and then move it,
millions of tons of it.
I would think that, yeah, there was
very much a-a special survey done of this island
looking for material
-that could be used to build. -TSOUKALOS: Right.
And I would say that an aerial survey
-would accomplish all of that. -Yes.
Yes, or any type of, you know,
advanced radar technology that, in my opinion, existed
with the extraterrestrials at the time.
NARRATOR: For Giorgio and David,
the more they learn about Nan Madol,
from the weight of the basalt columns
to the distance they had to be transported,
to the tools that would be needed to quarry the rock,
the more difficult it becomes to explain how all of this
could have been accomplished without the help
of advanced extraterrestrial technology.
♪ ♪
For me, Nan Madol ranks right up there
alongside Puma Punku and the Great Pyramids of Giza
as far as evidence
for the ancient astronaut theory is concerned.
Because we, today, would have a hard time
replicating these sites, even with modern-day technology.
And you know, the ancients tell us
that there's a much older structure under Nan Madol.
And you can see that there's still underwater columns
-at that location. -Right.
HENRY: There's sites literally all over the world
where the ancients were building impressive sites
on even more ancient,
even more impressive sites.
Look at Baalbek, for example,
where you have the Roman Temple of Jupiter
that is built on top of this platform composed
of these massive stone blocks.
And the perfection of that platform is
beyond astonishing.
NARRATOR: Eastern Lebanon.
The Bekaa valley.
Here, at this archaeological site,
stand the ruins of Heliopolis,
built in the fourth century BC
by Alexander the Great to honor Zeus.
But beneath the Corinthian columns
and remnants of both Greek and Roman architecture
lie the ruins of a site that is much, much older.
According to archaeologists,
it dates back nearly 9,000 years.
The ancient city of Baalbek...
...named after the early Canaanite deity, Baal.
HANAN CHARAF: Baal is the god of life,
the god of the sky, the god of the sun.
He was the god that was venerated
on the site of Baalbek
during the Canaanite and the Phoenician times.
ROBERT MULLINS: And so because it was already sacred to the god Baal,
then, later, the Greeks
and the Romans then would build temples
on this very same spot.
NARRATOR: Archeological surveys have revealed
that the enormous stone foundation
that lies at the base of the site
dates back tens of thousands of years.
Baalbek, as we know from the archaeological evidence,
must have existed during the Neolithic period,
between six to eight thousand years,
or even nine thousand years BC.
NARRATOR: But even more significant to ancient astronaut theorists
is their belief that the colossal stone platform
may once have served as a landing pad
for space travelers.
CHILDRESS: We don't know why
Baalbek was chosen as this specific site.
Uh, it may well be some kind of special power place.
♪ ♪
But what was originally there, before the Roman temple,
was this spaceport platform
that was apparently used for extraterrestrials
coming and going on planet Earth.
NARRATOR: As evidence, researchers point
to the gigantic megalithic stones
incorporated into the foundation,
each weighing between 800 to 1,200 tons.
And perfectly fitted together.
COPPENS: This is the real mystery of Baalbek.
How these stones came to be there,
why they were placed there and, specifically,
how they were transported into place,
because some of the stones are of such magnitude
that modern machinery is incapable of putting them there.
But somehow our ancestors were able to do this.
TSOUKALOS: Some have suggested
that this stone alone weighs
in excess of 1,200 tons.
How was it moved there?
Because, obviously, it's situated
on top of these stone rows
that we can find down here.
Which means that this stone had to be lifted
and then set on top
of these stones down here.
CHARAF: And because these stones were gigantic,
ancient people assumed
that extraterrestrial or unknown forces brought them
to the site itself.
BIRNES: It is one of the oldest,
oldest megalithic sites on the planet.
And it has these huge stones laid out
in a precise geometrical shape
at a time
when the prehistoric people who would've lived there,
who would've gone to the Beqaa Valley in Lebanon,
would have no concept of how to move stones of that nature.
NARRATOR: But if the moving, hoisting and setting
of such massive stones was so incredibly difficult,
then who, or what, placed them there?
And perhaps more importantly, why?
We know that the ancients always went to power places,
and Baalbek, clearly, is one of them.
It is a place where the gods were worshipped,
where the gods were said to be present.
And so, when it comes to Baalbek,
this platform was built there for a reason.
For what purpose it was used is a question
we can't answer at this moment in time.
But what we do know is that whatever was happening there
had a great religious significance to them
and was linked with worshipping deities.
Deities which clearly are of an otherworldly origin.
You know, it is awesome
that we now have over 250 episodes
of Ancient Aliens, in which we've featured
some of the most magnificent megalithic sites.
And what's also cool is that a lot of these sites
that we've featured are megalithic places
that most people haven't even heard about beforehand.
And they're not all ancient, either.
I mean, one of my favorite,
or most fascinating megalithic sites...
-Yeah. -...is Coral Castle in Florida,
-and it was built in the 1920s. -Mm-hmm.
MARTELL: And it was just done by one person.
-Ed Leedskalnin. -MARTELL: Yeah, and you know,
Ed claims that he knew the secrets of the pyramids.
And whether you believe him or not,
Coral Castle exists.
You can visit it to this day.
So it's possible we have this megalithic site in Florida
that was built with an extraterrestrial technology.
Mm-hmm.
NARRATOR: Homestead, Florida.
30 miles south of Miami.
This former agricultural town
is home to one of the most mysterious structures
in North America, a stone garden
made of sculpted blocks of ancient coral,
some weighing 30 tons.
It's called the Coral Castle.
Spread over several acres,
the complex formations and intricate designs
of the stone walls and sculptures marvel tourists.
But unlike other great structures around the world,
this site is not ancient.
CHILDRESS: Coral Castle in Florida
is often said to be, uh, the only modern
megalithic structure ever built.
NARRATOR: In 1923,
Ed Leedskalnin, a Latvian immigrant,
began building what he originally called
Rock Gate park.
But believe it or not, Leedskalnin insisted
that he was not using modern machinery
to build the impressive structure.
He also claimed that he was working alone.
McCLURE: Well, Ed was a hermit
and Ed was a loner
and he was a foreigner
and he was a recluse
and a scientist.
NOORY: He was in love with a woman
and he wanted to build this facility in memory of her.
And he waited for her to come from Europe,
and he waited and he waited, and she never did.
But the big question is,
is how did this frail little man move
these thousands of pounds of block by himself?
NARRATOR: Barely over five feet tall
and weighing just 100 pounds,
Leedskalnin is said to have carved, moved and hoisted
huge multiton stones using only a makeshift tripod.
McCLURE: He has a tripod-- three pieces of Florida pine--
and he's got some chains,
and he's now gonna lift 30 tons.
Ten tons of rock.
Can't be done. No one could do that.
NOORY: He would work at night.
He wouldn't let anybody watch him.
And he said that he knew the secrets of the pyramids.
NARRATOR: But what exactly was Leedskalnin referring to?
Had he rediscovered the same advanced technology
used to build megalithic structures
like Carnac and Sacsayhuamán?
McCLURE: Ed, over and over again,
would tell people that he knew the secrets
that helped the Egyptians build the pyramids.
What was he talking about?
Why was he constantly harking back to the Egyptians?
We don't know.
NARRATOR: Leedskalnin continued work on the Coral Castle
until his death in 1951.
In the journals he left behind,
the builder explained that he had discovered
the ancient secret of transforming stones
into weightless objects.
McCLURE: Ed says this in his pamphlet Magnetic Current,
that real gravity is actually real magnet.
So if you reverse the magnet forces
with a force of
some kind of electromagnetic radio-- perhaps-- frequency,
you can then make these rocks
not as heavy as they seem otherwise,
and therefore, you can lift them.
NARRATOR: But if Leedskalnin
had developed a device that could modify gravity...
...what was his secret?
Some suggest the answer lies in a mysterious black box
that can be seen in various photographs.
A box that has since disappeared.
McCLURE: The black box sitting on top
is the element that no one has ever seen,
except in those pictures, and no one has today.
We believe that black box has something to do
with how he got these massive,
heavy, brittle pieces of rock up in the air
in a way that no one can duplicate.
NOORY: He had some kind of magnetic machine
down in one of his other house areas
that has since been dismantled.
But it had a revolving ability.
He may have been having that thing spin.
The whole place could have been antigravity.
He probably just pushed these into place.
SARA SEAGER: Levitation is the only way that I know of
to hold up very heavy objects.
Very, very high-speed trains are magnetically levitated.
These high-speed trains
don't have wheels that touch any tracks.
They're literally suspended above the track
using magnetic forces.
BRANDENBURG: We can speculate at this time
that there are techniques
for using electromagnetism to nullify gravity.
Uh, this was the great quest of Einstein.
The motivation for such technology is, of course,
to lift a large spaceship out into space
and across space.
-ASTRONAUT: Oh, we have arrived. -(laughter)
(indistinct comm chatter)
NARRATOR: Could it be that Ed Leedskalnin
utilized antigravity to levitate and distribute
the enormous rocks used to build Coral Castle?
If so, where did this incredible knowledge come from?
COPPENS: And he died, taking this secret to his grave.
The question is, did he invent it?
Or did he himself somehow inherit it
or learn it from a tradition
or maybe from some visitor from another realm?
McCLURE: The only thing that is explainable
is that someone with a higher form of physics
and understanding of gravity
has created the ability of one person to lift stones
that modern technology could not do the way he did it.
It had to come from a different place in this galaxy.
TSOUKALOS: The fact that one guy
created these massive structures is absolutely fascinating.
Am I suggesting that he did this
with extraterrestrial technology?
No, because I don't know.
Am I excluding that possibility? No.
NARRATOR: If aliens visited Earth in ancient times,
perhaps the world's unexplained structures
provide clues to unlocking
not only the secrets of our past...
...but a glimpse into our future.
VON DÄNIKEN: I think that extraterrestrials
would not have left our solar system
some thousands of years ago without any proof.
They wanted that, in the far future,
we start to reflect,
"Have we been visited by outer space?"
Worldwide, on every continent,
the most ancient of structures all essentially feature
the same type of masonry, or stonework.
And you can't just attribute this to coincidence.
Either our ancestors all went to the same school
or they were visited by the same teachers.
MARTELL: The ubiquitous knowledge seems to be coming from
either one source or a shared source
that is influencing the whole globe.
HENRY: Humanity has had a hidden past
where we were building these megalithic structures
by unknown means.
But now, we're starting to develop
is a more accurate picture of this megalithic civilization
that was global, that was highly advanced, intelligent,
probably working with extraterrestrials,
and now we're beginning to learn the true purpose
of those megaliths.
CAPTIONING PROVIDED BY A+E NETWORKS
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.