Original subtitles

MAN: Dr. Oppenheimer's continuing conduct and associations

have reflected a serious disregard

for the requirements of the security system.

MAN: The country asked him to do something

and he did it brilliantly.

MAN: He didn't understand what sort of forces he was up against.

(lighter snaps shut)

(stenotype clicking)

GORDON GRAY, US Special Counsel: The hearing will come to order.

Dr. J.R. Oppenheimer,

the Institute for Advanced Study,

Princeton, New Jersey.

There has developed considerable question

whether your continued employment

on Atomic Energy Commission work is consistent

with the interests of the national security.

In view of your access

to highly sensitive classified information,

and in view of allegations which, until disproved,

raise questions as to your veracity, conduct,

and even your loyalty,

the Commission has no other recourse

but to suspend your clearance

until the matter has been resolved.

NARRATOR: The hearings were held in a makeshift courtroom

in a shabby government office in Washington, D.C.

GORDON GRAY, US Special Counsel: It was reported that your wife,

Katherine Puening Oppenheimer, was a member of the Communist Party.

It was reported that your brother

Frank Friedman Oppenheimer was a member of the Communist Party.

NARRATOR: J. Robert Oppenheimer,

the most eminent atomic scientist in America,

stood accused, a risk to national security.

It was 1954.

The cold war with Russia was fueling fears

of Communist infiltration

at the highest levels of government.

GORDON GRAY, US Special Counsel: It was reported that you stated

that you were not a Communist,

but had probably belonged to every Communist front organization

on the West Coast

and had signed many petitions

in which Communists were interested.

NARRATOR: The news shocked Americans everywhere.

If Robert Oppenheimer could not be trusted

with the nation's secrets, who could be?

Brilliant, proud, charismatic,

a poet as well as a physicist,

Oppenheimer had seemed to enjoy the full trust and confidence

of his country's leaders.

He was a national hero,

the man who had led the scientific team

which devised the atomic bomb...

(explosion)

...the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.

Oppenheimer came to prominence through unspeakable violence

and suffered all the ambiguities and contradictions

he had helped to create.

J. Robert Oppenheimer, (archival): We knew the world would not be the same.

A few people laughed.

A few people cried.

Most people were silent.

I remembered the...

line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita.

Vishnu...

is trying to persuade the prince that

he should do his duty,

and to impress him,

takes on his multi-armed form

and says,

"Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."

I suppose we all thought that one way or another.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: What he was trying to help the world to understand

is that these are not weapons.

These are forces of destruction so great

that we finally, as a species, are in a position

where we can destroy the entire human world,

without question.

NARRATOR: As the nation's top nuclear weapons advisor,

Oppenheimer tried to warn his countrymen

of their dangers,

but powerful figures within the government feared

he was a threat to America's security.

They determined to destroy him.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: The country asked him to do something,

and he did it brilliantly,

and they repaid him

for the tremendous job he did

by breaking him.

ROGER ROBB, Courtroom Prosecutor: Doctor, do you think that social contacts

between a person employed in secret war work

and Communists or Communist adherents

is dangerous?

Are we talking about today?

Yes.

Certainly not necessarily so.

They could conceivably be.

Was that your view in 1943 and during the war years?

NARRATOR: The hearings would go on for nearly a month,

the story of Oppenheimer's life laid bare;

his secrets exposed;

his brilliance and arrogance,

naiveté and insecurities

debated, dissected and judged.

A special three-man board,

appointed by the Atomic Energy Commission,

would rule on the charges.

To defend himself,

the embattled scientist felt compelled

to tell his own story in his own way.

OPPENHEIMER: The items of so-called derogatory information

cannot be fairly understood

except in the context of my life and-and work.

I was born in New York in 1904.

My father came to this country at the age of 17

from Germany.

NARRATOR: Julius Oppenheimer was a penniless Jewish immigrant

who arrived in America in 1888

unable to speak a word of English,

and went to work in his uncle's textile importing business.

By the time he was 30,

he was a partner in the company and a wealthy man.

When he fell in love,

it was with a sensitive, talented woman

of exquisite taste and refinement.

My mother was born in Baltimore,

and before her marriage,

she was an artist and teacher of art.

NARRATOR: Ella Oppenheimer was "very delicate,"

a friend remembered,

with an air of sadness about her.

Robert was precociously brilliant,

and both parents were protective of his uncommon gifts.

Frail, frequently sick,

he was attended to by servants,

driven everywhere.

He rarely played with other children.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: He wasn't mischievous.

He was too brilliant to be just one of the children.

But his parents treasured him,

treated him like a little jewel,

and he just skipped being a boy.

NARRATOR: "My childhood did not prepare me for the fact

that the world is full of cruel and bitter things,"

Oppenheimer said.

"It gave me no normal, healthy way to be a bastard."

Sometime around the age of five,

Robert's grandfather gave him a small collection of minerals.

"From then on," he said,

"I became, in a completely childish way,

"an ardent mineral collector.

"But it began to be also a bit of a scientist's interest,

a fascination with crystals."

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: He wrote to the New York Mineralogical Society

on a typewriter.

They were so impressed with what he had to say that,

of course, thinking he was an adult,

they invited him to give a lecture,

and little Robert, at age ten or 11,

shows up at the New York Mineralogical Society,

and has to stand on a box

in order to see over the lectern to give this lecture.

That is not a normal average childhood.

NARRATOR: Eight years separated Robert from his brother Frank,

too many for companionship.

Robert was a loner.

And at New York's Ethical Culture school,

he inhabited his own rarefied world,

more comfortable with his teachers

than with the other students,

who nicknamed him "Booby" Oppenheimer.

To protect himself,

he relied on his preternatural brilliance

and grew aloof and arrogant.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: He didn't grow up.

He studied a great deal, which shielded him from the world,

and the emotional side of him

didn't catch up until much later.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer graduated high school valedictorian

and then conquered Harvard.

He studied chemistry, physics, calculus,

English and French literature,

Western, Chinese and Hindu philosophy.

He even found time to write stories and poems.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: He described it as being

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: like the Huns invading Rome,

by which he meant he was going to swallow up every bit

of culture and art and science that he could possibly do.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: Harvard is an environment in which the intellectual life

is a rich feast,

but the social life is a desert.

NARRATOR: In all his years at Harvard, he never had a date.

He remained immature, uncertain,

easily bewildered in social situations.

One friend remembered "bouts of melancholy

and deep, deep depressions."

"In the days of my almost infinitely prolonged adolescence,"

he said later, "I hardly took an action,

"hardly did anything that did not arouse in me

"a very great sense of revulsion and of wrong.

"My feeling about myself

was always one of extreme discontent."

His doubts about himself came clear in his poems:

OPPENHEIMER (David Strathairn): The dawn invests our substance with desire

And the slow light betrays us, and our wistfulness...

We find ourselves again

Each in his separate prison

Ready, hopeless for negotiation

With other men.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer graduated in just three years,

and in 1925 headed for Cambridge, England,

and an advanced degree at the celebrated Cavendish laboratory.

Academic success had always come easily.

Ambitious, determined to succeed,

in England he would learn what it was like to struggle

and fail.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Oppenheimer, like so many theoretical physicists,

it turns out that if he walks through a lab,

the instruments all break.

And he's trying to do a rather delicate physical experiment

and he's not getting anywhere.

And he's sinking deeper and deeper

into that special despair

that comes along when prodigies grow up

and have... and realize they can't just do it

by being a prodigy anymore.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: His eyes and his hands and his mind

are not coordinated.

He's can't do what all of the other young people

are able to do.

And he finds himself one day standing at a blackboard,

staring into space, saying, "The point is...

The point is... The point is..."

There is no point.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: He fell into despair. He fell into depression.

Here was a point where he was suddenly doubting his intellect,

his ability to do science,

so it's not surprising that at that point,

the whole thing would go collapsing down for him.

At the same time, he had never really learned

how to approach women,

how to close the sale, if I may call it that,

and he was dealing with that as well.

NARRATOR: Wrestling with inner demons

that threatened to overwhelm him,

he was, he later said, "at the point of bumping myself off."

In 1926, Oppenheimer would save himself.

He cut free from the English experimental laboratory

and headed for Göttingen, Germany,

to study theoretical physics

with some of the greatest scientific minds of the century.

"I had very great misgivings about myself on all fronts,"

he said.

"I hadn't been good; I hadn't done anybody any good;

and here was something I felt just driven to try."

In Göttingen, Oppenheimer would make his mark in a new science

which explored a world that ran counter to everyday experience:

Quantum Physics.

HERBERT YORK, Physicist: Quantum Physics is the basic Physics

behind electrons and atoms.

It turns out that classical ideas about

Newtonian mechanics and particle motion and so on,

do not apply to things of... to things of atomic scale.

You needed a new kind of physics.

So if you're going to change on a different scale

the-the whole structure of the physics,

everything has to be redone, if you will,

and that means there are enormous opportunities available

for a young graduate student

with talent to come in and make various aspects of this his own.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer immersed himself

in the mysteries of the subatomic universe,

where nothing was certain, and probability the only rule.

He found the work exhilarating.

"There was terror," he wrote,

"as well as exaltation."

FREEMAN DYSON, Physicist: Oppenheimer really flourished there.

He annoyed everybody, of course, by

talking too much and...

pretending he knew everything.

He always considered very carefully what he said

as though he was speaking for the ages.

And he expected everybody to be seduced

by his Renaissance man knowledge

of everything.

NARRATOR: In Göttingen, Oppenheimer came into his own

as a theoretical physicist,

publishing 16 papers in three years.

By the time he was ready to return to America,

he was focused and confident,

an ambitious young man with an international reputation.

OPPENHEIMER: In the spring of 1929, I returned to the United States.

I was homesick for this country.

I had learned in my student days

a great deal about the new physics.

I wanted to pursue this myself, to explain it,

and to foster its cultivation.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer was just 25

and already knew more about the Quantum Universe

than nearly any other American.

He settled in California

and began teaching at Cal Tech in Pasadena

and the University of California in Berkeley.

But at first,

his lectures were incomprehensible.

ROBERT CHRISTY, Physicist: It was customary until I got there

for students to take his main course in Theoretical Physics

twice in a row.

They would take a second year to fully understand it.

Other students were taking it in pairs.

One would listen, the other one would write notes

and they'd work out the lecture afterward.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: He spoke at a very fast clip,

puffing on his cigarette, which he always had;

he was writing with his chalk, and he was moving back and forth

between his left hand and his right hand so quickly

that people thought he was going to smoke the chalk,

you know, and write with the cigarette,

uh... and... they couldn't follow him.

But he was able to transform himself

into an excellent lecturer who was charismatic

and extremely effective.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer became a magnetic, dazzling teacher,

but his arrogance could make even his colleagues wince.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: He was not likable

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: because he wouldn't let you look at him.

He was always on stage.

You never had a feeling

that he was speaking from the heart somehow.

He never came across as a real person.

There was always a studied remark

intended to convey some sort of,

I don't know, superiority

or deeper knowledge than you pos...

you slobs could possibly understand.

He could be devastating, especially to young people.

He became very impatient

and was always all over them,

and sometimes reduced them practically to tears.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: His sharp remarks were not inadvertent.

They had to do with a kind of arrogance and contempt.

I take it to be a way

that he disguised his anxieties,

that he disguised his social insecurities,

but it was immensely cruel.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer called his behavior "beastliness."

"It is not easy," he wrote in a letter to his brother,

"at least it is not easy for me,

to be quite free of the desire to browbeat somebody."

Ever since Oppenheimer had visited New Mexico

as a teenager, he had been haunted by its wild beauty.

In 1927, his father took a lease on a rustic cabin

high in the mountains 45 miles northeast of Santa Fe

and gave it to both his sons.

The Oppenheimers called it Perro Caliente,

Spanish for "hot dog."

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: He found peace there.

He found a different self there,

one that he liked, a cowboy self.

Friends who went to visit him later would talk about the fact

that he would go out riding for three days at a time

up the ridge of the Rocky Mountains

with a bar of chocolate

and a pint of whiskey in his hip pocket,

and they would be starving and terrified

riding through mountain storms and lightning,

and he would just be having a wonderful time.

NARRATOR: "My two great loves,"

he once told a friend,

"are physics and desert country.

It's a pity they can't be combined."

(birds singing)

(loud shouting, whistle blowing)

(gunshots)

In 1934, San Francisco longshoremen battled police,

shutting down the waterfront just across the bay

from Oppenheimer's home in Berkeley.

America itself seemed on the verge of revolution,

with violence in the streets,

strikes, a failing economy,

a third of the nation unemployed.

But Oppenheimer remained aloof.

OPPENHEIMER: I had no radio, no telephone.

I never read a newspaper or a current magazine.

I learned of the stock market crash

in the fall of 1929 only long after the event.

I voted for the first time

in a presidential election in 1936.

I was deeply interested in my science,

but I had no understanding

of the relations of man to his society.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: The Depression didn't affect him personally.

He had an income from his father,

who was wealthy.

And politics

seemed gross to him.

OPPENHEIMER: Beginning late in 1936,

my interests began to change.

I saw what the Depression was doing to my students.

Often, they could get no jobs.

But I had no framework

of political conviction or experience

to give me perspective in these matters.

In the spring of 1936,

I was introduced by friends to Jean Tatlock.

In the autumn, I began to court her.

We were at least twice close enough to marriage

to think of ourselves as engaged.

NARRATOR: Jean Tatlock was Oppenheimer's first real love.

She was 22, studying to be a doctor,

and passionately involved

with the contentious issues of her day:

the civil war in Spain,

organizing workers,

racial discrimination.

She was also a member of the Communist Party

and introduced Oppenheimer into her political circle.

I made left-wing friends,

and felt sympathy for causes

which hitherto would have seemed so remote from me,

like the Loyalist cause in Spain

and the organization of migratory workers.

I liked the new sense of companionship

and, at the time, felt that I was coming to be part

of the life of my time and country.

I did not then regard Communists as dangerous,

and some of their declared objectives

seemed to me desirable.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: In the 1930s,

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: in the bottom of the Depression,

there was a deep and fundamental concern

about the future of this country,

whether its economic

and, to some degree, political system was adequate.

We came later in America to demonize people

who belonged to the Communist Party,

but it was a very common business in the '30s.

NARRATOR: Workers, teachers, doctors, writers.

Americans of every stripe and color were party members,

but although he shared many of their political concerns,

there is nothing to prove

that Oppenheimer himself was a Communist.

Oppenheimer never joined the party.

The FBI spent 30 years

trying to prove that Oppenheimer had been a Communist

and was never able to do so.

That's probably good evidence that he never joined the party.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer was deeply bound to Tatlock,

but she was volatile, moody,

sometimes distraught.

After three years, she broke off their relationship.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: Their relationship appears to have been

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: quite a stormy one,

and Jean Tatlock,

although for many years people who knew her didn't say this,

was uncertain whether she...

wanted to be with men or women,

whether she was lesbian or heterosexual,

and, I believe, that must have been at the bottom

of her crises with Oppenheimer.

And how that fed into his own

sexual certainties and uncertainties,

one can only imagine.

He was troubled.

That's why he was attracted to troubled women.

He was troubled.

He didn't know who he was.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer would always feel a tender attachment to Jean,

but they had gone their separate ways.

When Kitty Harrison set her cap for him.

Kitty was 29

and also a former Communist Party member.

She was married to a doctor,

but that didn't stop her

from going after the well-known scientist.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: When she saw Oppenheimer, she grabbed him.

They were together, of course, for the rest of their lives,

but it was...

God knows, a tumultuous relationship

with a lot of bickering and a lot of fighting

and a lot of drinking.

You know, Kitty and Jean were both dominant women.

They were passionate women,

and in some way, he could comfort them.

He could save them, or try to.

Here were two women who both presented themselves

as people who needed saving,

and Robert jumped in like the...

like the white knight that he... I think, wanted to be.

NARRATOR: In 1940,

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer became Kitty's fourth husband.

Less than seven months later,

their first child, Peter, was born.

Although they continued to see some of their left-wing friends,

the Oppenheimers were, by now,

detaching themselves from Communist Party politics.

OPPENHEIMER: My views were evolving.

At that time, I did not fully understand,

as in time I came to understand,

how completely the Communist Party in this country

was under the control of Russia.

Many of its declared objectives seemed desirable to me,

but I never accepted Communist dogma or theory.

In fact, it never made any sense to me.

NARRATOR: What did make sense was science.

He would never let politics interfere with his teaching

or his physics.

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: Of course, he paid attention to experiment,

but he was a theorist.

He probed very deeply.

He was interested in the deepest ideas,

and he did contribute to some of them.

FREEMAN DYSON, Physicist: In 1939,

he published with his student Hartland Snyder,

really a great piece of work,

explaining how stars collapse,

how they can actually end up as black holes,

which had never been understood before.

NARRATOR: That same year, a startling dispatch

from the abstruse world of nuclear physics

changed the course of history

and Oppenheimer's life.

Two German chemists

reported that the uranium nucleus

could be split.

The discovery soon had a name:

Nuclear Fission.

"The U-business is unbelievable,"

Oppenheimer wrote.

"Many points are still unclear.

"I think it really not too improbable

"that a ten-centimeter cube of Uranium deuteride

might very well blow itself to hell."

The discovery of Nuclear Fission began a race that would end

with the atomic bomb.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: He saw already

at the beginning, as, I think,

any really good physicist did,

just by doing the numbers,

about the

amount of energy released in this reaction,

that this was going to change the world.

With that discovery came a change

in the relationship between science

and the nation state.

Every country in the world

in 1939 and 1940 that had the capability

of even beginning to work on a bomb

began that work,

not only England and Germany and the United States,

but also France, Japan and the Soviet Union.

NARRATOR: But the only threat came from Germany.

OPPENHEIMER: We had information in those days

of German activity in the field of nuclear fission.

We were aware of what it might mean

if they beat us to the draw

in the development of atomic bombs.

I had relatives there,

and was later to help in extricating them

and bringing them to this country.

(weapons firing)

NARRATOR: Nine months after the discovery of nuclear fission,

Germany invaded Poland.

World War II had begun.

When the United States entered the war two years later,

American scientists feared

that Germany was already well ahead

in the race to build an atomic bomb.

If America was going to develop a bomb first,

they would have to work fast.

(train whistle blowing)

In October 1942,

the 20th Century Limited was speeding toward New York City.

Sharing a private Pullman car were Robert Oppenheimer

and a 46-year-old career Army officer,

General Leslie Groves.

Groves had been placed in command

of the Manhattan Project,

the staggering enterprise

to marshal the vast technical and industrial resources

to develop an atomic bomb.

Now, he was looking over the man

he hoped might head up the secret laboratory

where the bomb would be designed and built.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Groves's way of operating was to be blunt and brutal.

He knew, as they said during the First World War,

how to get the Spam to the front lines.

He knew how to get the job done.

NARRATOR: The two men talked for hours.

When they were done,

Groves had made up his mind.

Oppenheimer, he believed,

had the ambition, discipline and brilliance

to lead the most complex scientific effort

America had ever undertaken.

"He's a genius," Groves said later.

"A real genius.

"He can talk to you about anything you bring up.

"Well, not exactly.

He doesn't know anything about sports."

ROBERT CHRISTY, Physicist: Groves went a way out on a limb

ROBERT CHRISTY, Physicist: in choosing Oppenheimer.

No one would have

would have supposed that this esoteric person,

with an interest in French poetry

and Hindu mysticism,

would be a practical person to lead a laboratory.

He'd never directed anything really,

to speak of.

He hadn't even been a department chairman.

Most of his friends think

that Oppenheimer could not run a hamburger stand.

NARRATOR: Groves wanted Oppenheimer anyway,

but the United States Army refused

to give the scientist a security clearance.

The country was at war.

Even though Russia was America's ally,

anyone with Communist associations

was considered a possible spy.

It was the first time

Oppenheimer's loyalty to America

would be questioned.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: The security people are appalled.

Oppenheimer is the last person they would want as director,

and he's the next to the last person

they'd even want involved in the project at all

as a... uh... as a janitor.

Groves is very conservative.

He hates Communists.

But Groves does not allow

Oppenheimer's left-wing activities during the 1930s

to trump his belief

that Oppenheimer will be just the right person.

OPPENHEIMER: In early 1943, I received a letter,

appointing me director of the laboratory.

Almost everyone knew this was a great undertaking.

It might determine the outcome of the war.

It was an unparalleled opportunity

to bring to bear the knowledge and art of science

for the benefit of the country.

This job, if it were achieved,

would be part of history.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer had once fantasized

combining his passion for physics

with his love of the desert and mountains of New Mexico.

Now, he suggested a remote wilderness

near the Los Alamos Canyon, northeast of Santa Fe,

as the site for the atomic bomb laboratory.

General Groves quickly agreed.

Oppenheimer's fantasy had come true.

Before leaving for Los Alamos,

Oppenheimer entertained an old friend for dinner,

Haakon Chevalier,

a French professor teaching at Berkeley

and a dedicated Communist.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Oppenheimer had known Chevalier for years.

He was... Chevalier was one of his closet friends.

He knew Chevalier was a Communist.

It didn't really worry him.

He judged that Chevalier wouldn't do anything

that would compromise Robert Oppenheimer.

NARRATOR: But Chevalier put Oppenheimer at risk.

He told his friend that a British engineer

named Eltenton

wanted information about Oppenheimer's scientific work

to pass on to a diplomat at the Soviet Embassy.

Oppenheimer dismissed the idea.

"That would be treason," he said.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Oppenheimer did not, at the time,

take this approach as something serious.

It was only later that it came to be a problem

because it was useful to people who wanted to destroy him

to make it a problem.

ROGER ROBB, Courtroom Prosecutor: Doctor, do you think that social contacts

between a person employed in secret war work

and Communists or Communist adherents

is dangerous?

Certainly not necessarily so.

They could conceivably be.

My awareness of the danger would be greater today.

Doctor, in your opinion,

is association with the Communist movement

compatible with a job on a secret war project?

I was associated with the Communist movement,

and I did not regard it as inappropriate

to take the job at Los Alamos.

Doctor, let me ask you a blunt question.

Don't you know, and didn't you know certainly by 1943,

that the Communist Party was an instrument

or a vehicle of espionage in this country?

I was not clear about it.

I am asking you now...

if fear of espionage

wasn't one of the reasons

why you felt that association with the Communist Party

was inconsistent with work on a secret war project?

Yes.

Your answer is that it was?

Yes.

You would have felt then, I assume,

that a rather continued or constant association

between a person employed on the atomic bomb project

and Communists or Communist adherents

was dangerous?

Potentially dangerous, conceivably dangerous.

Look, I have had a lot of secrets in my head a long time.

It does not matter who I associate with.

I don't talk about those secrets.

NARRATOR: In times of spiritual trial,

Oppenheimer would search the Bhagavad Gita,

a sacred Hindu text,

for meaning and comfort.

He often turned to the story of the warrior Prince Arjuna,

who, to fulfill his destiny, must fight and kill.

OPPENHEIMER: "In battle, in forest,

"at the precipice in the mountains,

"on the dark great sea,

"in the midst of javelins and arrows,

"in sleep, in confusion,

in the depths of shame,

the good deeds a man has done before

defend him."

NARRATOR: In April 1943, Oppenheimer was 38 years old,

about to take on a task

for which few people thought him capable:

harnessing the forces of the atom

to build a bomb of awesome destructive power.

There was little doubt

that a potentially world-shattering undertaking lay ahead.

We began to see the great explosion.

We also began to see how rough, difficult, challenging

and unpredictable this job might turn out to be.

ROBERT CHRISTY, Physicist: A whole town was being constructed,

and Oppenheimer was trying to organize the science.

But in addition, they were constructing roads,

laboratory buildings and homes.

We had no sidewalks anywhere,

and in one season of the year,

walked around in mud up to our ankles.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: They were trying to build a first-class physics laboratory

out in the middle of a howling wilderness.

It was a hell of a place to try to move a linear accelerator

up the narrow switchback mountain roads

to install it at the top.

NARRATOR: The laboratory at Los Alamos was a closely guarded secret.

From its beginnings, security had the highest priority.

Army intelligence watched over everything and everybody,

especially the laboratory director with the left-wing past.

Oppenheimer's phones were tapped,

his mail opened,

his office wired,

his comings and goings closely monitored.

His driver and bodyguard was an undercover agent.

Oppenheimer, who knew everything that was going on at Los Alamos,

was still waiting for his security clearance.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: Oppenheimer goes about doing the job as best he can do it,

but the security people are like flies on a hot summer day.

They're constantly buzzing around him.

They're constantly annoying him.

He does his best to shoo them, you know, away,

but there's one instance

where he makes a terrible, terrible mistake.

OPPENHEIMER: I had visited Jean Tatlock in the spring of 1943.

I almost had to.

She was not much of a Communist,

but she was certainly a member of the party.

There was nothing dangerous about that.

There was nothing potentially dangerous about that.

NARRATOR: The government knew all about Oppenheimer's visit.

Agents from Army intelligence

waited outside Tatlock's apartment,

while Oppenheimer spent the night,

and reported the details to the FBI.

ROGER ROBB, Courtroom Prosecutor: Why did you have to see her?

She had indicated a great desire to see me

before we left for Los Alamos.

At that time, I couldn't go.

For one thing, I wasn't supposed to say

where we were going or anything.

I felt that she had to see me.

She was undergoing psychiatric treatment.

She was extremely unhappy.

Did you find out why she had to see you?

Because she was still in love with me.

When did you see her after that?

She took me to the airport, and I never saw her again.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Jean Tatlock was a wounded, lonely woman,

who was at wit's end,

and she wanted this man whom she loved

to come to her and he did.

From the point of view of the gumshoes who sat outside

Jean Tatlock's apartment all night in their car,

writing down who came and who went and at what hour,

and when the lights were on and when the lights were off,

there may have been a security problem.

But for him,

human need, human compassion,

caring for someone you love

trumped the security system.

NARRATOR: The FBI feared that Tatlock

might be passing atomic secrets to the Russians.

They tapped her phone,

but persistent eavesdropping revealed nothing.

Six months after Oppenheimer's visit,

Jean Tatlock killed herself.

"I am disgusted with everything,"

she wrote in an unsigned note.

"To those who loved me and helped me,

all love and courage.

"I wanted to live and to give,

and I got paralyzed.

"I tried like hell to understand

and couldn't.

"I think I would have been a liability all my life.

"At least I could take away the burden of a paralyzed soul

from a fighting world."

You have said that you knew she had been a Communist?

Yes. I knew that in the fall of 1937.

Was there any reason for you to believe

that she wasn't still a Communist in 1943?

No.

Pardon?

There wasn't. I do not know what she was doing in 1943.

You had no reason to believe she wasn't a Communist, did you?

No.

You spent the night with her,

didn't you?

Yes.

That is when you were working on a secret war project?

Yes.

You have told us, this morning,

that you thought that at times

social contacts with Communists

on the part of one working on a secret war project

was dangerous.

Could conceivably be.

You didn't think spending a night

with a dedicated Communist...

I don't believe she was a dedicated Communist.

You don't?

No.

NARRATOR: Five weeks after Oppenheimer's visit to Tatlock,

General Groves rammed through his security clearance.

But Oppenheimer continued to operate

under a shadow of suspicion,

and by the summer of 1943, the pressure began to tell.

That August, Oppenheimer volunteered to talk

with Colonel Boris Pash,

chief of Army counterintelligence for the West Coast.

He had begun to worry about his conversation

with his friend Haakon Chevalier.

He realized that he should have reported it at once,

but he still didn't want to get his old friend in trouble.

BORIS PASH, Colonel US MI: General Groves has, more or less, I feel,

BORIS PASH, Colonel US MI: placed a certain responsibility in me.

I don't mean to take up too much of your time.

OPPENHEIMER: That's perfectly all right.

Whatever time you choose.

I have no firsthand knowledge,

but a man attached to the Soviet Consul

has indicated indirectly through an intermediary

that he was in a position to transmit information.

I think it might not hurt to be on the lookout for it.

If you wanted to watch him,

I think it would be the appropriate thing to do.

His name is Eltenton.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer had simply wanted to alert Army intelligence

that Eltenton might be a threat,

but Pash did not trust Oppenheimer

and his left-wing past.

He hid a microphone in the telephone receiver

and recorded their entire conversation.

Oppenheimer had no idea that everything he said was set down,

transcribed and added to his security file,

where it would be unearthed years later

with disastrous consequences.

OPPENHEIMER: There were approaches to other people

who were troubled by them

and sometimes they came and discussed them with me.

And that's as far as I can go on that.

BORIS PASH, Colonel US MI: These people, were they contacted directly by Eltenton?

OPPENHEIMER: No.

BORIS PASH, Colonel US MI: Oh, through another party?

Yes.

Well, now,

could we know through whom that contact was made?

I think it would be a mistake.

Oppenheimer makes up this complicated story

so that the security people are looking all over the place,

and they won't finger Robert and they won't finger Chevalier.

He evidently hadn't learned to think

the way security people think.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Every time he said something else, he just made it worse.

Pash ended up, of course,

believing Oppenheimer was a Communist spy.

OPPENHEIMER: But I think in mentioning Eltenton's name,

I essentially said that he may be acting in a way

which is dangerous to the country

and which should be watched.

I'm not going to mention anyone else's name in the same breath.

I just can't do that.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer quickly put the whole incident behind him.

There was too much work to do.

Los Alamos was growing into a bustling town

with thousands of people.

He had wildly underestimated the magnitude of the job.

But he was thriving.

In spite of the initial doubts of his scientific colleagues,

he was proving that he was more than up

to the enormous task.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: He showed an ability to motivate and inspire

that, I think, surprised everyone.

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: Everyone loved him because he was everywhere.

He understood all of these

absurdly

difficult and intractable problems,

and he often had witty things to say about them.

HAROLD AGNEW, Physicist: He had a certain charisma, a certain charm,

a certain flair.

He had a robin's egg blue convertible Cadillac, you know.

And if you're a young kid, and here's the boss,

and he's driving around with his porkpie hat

and his tweed jacket and cigarette always,

you know, like in the movies.

You know, you're impressed.

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: Oppenheimer inspired everyone.

He expressed the intellectual essence

of what we were doing,

the deepest sense of what it was.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: I don't know in retrospect who could have done it better;

who could have pulled that gang--

80% of which were prima donnas of their own.

Could have pulled that gang together and

and made them work as a... as a unit.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: In being the director of this historic laboratory,

Oppenheimer found his greatest and most natural role.

He was cruel to people before the war.

He was cruel to people after the war,

but he wasn't cruel to people during the war.

The period at Los Alamos was the only time in his life

when he wasn't plagued by existential doubt,

when all the parts came together and worked together.

It was the first chance he'd ever had

to serve the country and forget himself.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer shaped an array of brilliant,

eccentric scientists into a team.

The Hungarian refugee Edward Teller was his biggest problem.

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: Teller was always an ebullient scientist.

Very bright, quite impatient.

When I showed up at Los Alamos,

I saw this name chalked next to the door:

E. Teller,

but there was no one in the office.

I learned that he was rather unhappy

that he had not been chosen as leader of the theory division

and had gone off in a huff.

His passion from the very first was to create

what he called "the Zupa," the super-bomb.

NARRATOR: The "super" was a hydrogen bomb,

a weapon with nearly unlimited destructive power.

But since a hydrogen bomb would need

an atomic bomb to set it off,

Oppenheimer gave Teller's super a low priority.

Oppenheimer, said, "No, no, we got enough on our hands.

"We're not going to, we're not going to...

"we got to make the hy... we got to make the atomic bomb.

"That's what we're going to do.

"That's our job

and that's what we're going to focus on."

NARRATOR: Teller threatened to quit

until Oppenheimer relented and let him work independently

to try and design his super-bomb,

but there would always be bad blood between them.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: Teller was obsessive.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: He would not accept Oppenheimer's judgment

about the feasibility of this project.

He was not a crackpot or anything like that.

He was an excellent physicist,

but he got off on something that was simply wrong,

and he couldn't let it go.

Teller never forgave Oppenheimer,

and, uh...

he paid him back...

unfortunately.

NARRATOR: By summer of 1944,

the enormous burden of responsibility

had begun to take its toll.

Losing weight, afflicted with a rasping cough,

Oppenheimer chain-smoked his way

through increasingly demanding months.

Kitty was an additional burden.

She refused to take on the role of the director's wife

and found herself at loose ends.

After their second child was born

in the Los Alamos Hospital, a girl they named Toni,

she became even more distracted.

She was drinking hard,

on the verge of emotional collapse

while Oppenheimer was preoccupied,

desperately pushing the project forward.

For me it was a time so filled with work,

with the need for decision and action and consultation,

there was room for little else.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: They had to invent all these new technologies

in these very short months

from the summer of '44 to the summer of '45.

Oppenheimer nearly broke down.

He was really depressed.

He thought he'd blown it.

He thought they had found themselves at a dead end.

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: It was devilishly difficult

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: grappling with problems

which were on the edge of absurdity.

Just imagine trying to find out

what's going on within an explosion

all of which is over in less than a thousandth of a second.

He seriously considered leaving the project,

and one of his friends finally took him aside

and said, "Robert, you can't leave.

"You're the only person who can make this happen.

You have to stay. I don't care what you think."

And he did stay.

The consensus of all our opinions

and every directive I had

stressed the extreme urgency of the work.

Time and time again we had in the technical work

almost paralyzing crises.

Time and again the laboratory drew itself together

and we faced the new problems and got on with the work.

We worked by night and by day.

NARRATOR: While Oppenheimer and his team raced on,

the war against Japan and Germany

was reaching a bloody climax.

On May 7, 1945,

the Nazis surrendered.

The race with Germany to build the bomb was over.

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: We had joined this project fearing that the Germans

were working on trying to produce a bomb

and if they succeeded in reaching it before we did,

they wouldn't be very sentimental about using it.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: When Germany surrenders,

the bomb is several months away from being built.

And the question is, should we continue?

Is it the right thing to do?

Is it ethical?

We never heard any suggestion from Oppenheimer that uh...

there was any course other than continuing.

There was a kind of momentum involved

in our efforts in this direction.

It was an enormous project.

We were all deeply involved in

finding out whether the darn thing would work.

When you see something that is technically sweet,

you go ahead and do it

and you argue about what to do about it

only after you have had your technical success.

NARRATOR: Caught up in the momentum of the project,

driven by the desire to finish the job he had begun,

Oppenheimer was determined to see it through.

"This might help to convince everybody," he argued,

"that the next war would be fatal.

"For this purpose,

actual combat use

might even be the best thing."

He rejected the idea of demonstrating the bomb first.

HERBERT YORK, Physicist: If you have a demonstration,

what it is is a fantastic firework

with nobody getting hurt.

What's important about nuclear weapons

is not that it's fantastic fireworks.

What's important about nuclear weapons

is the fact they kill people.

NARRATOR: On May 31, 1945,

Oppenheimer joined a meeting

of high-ranking government officials,

scientists and military men.

It was agreed that

"the most desirable target

"was a vital war plant

"employing a large number of workers

and closely surrounded by workers' houses."

Oppenheimer made no objection.

What worried him was whether the bomb would work.

The answer would come in New Mexico's Alamogordo desert,

the place the Spanish had called the Jornada del Muerto,

"The Journey of Death."

On July 15,

Oppenheimer climbed a 110-foot tower

for one last look at the bomb.

It would be tested the next day.

He was down to 115 pounds,

tense, on edge.

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: There was great tension about the test,

great uncertainty whether it would work

or produce a pathetic fizzle.

This had never been done before, and it was a...

no one had a clear picture at all of what to expect.

NARRATOR: The evening before the test, someone recalled,

"The frogs had gathered in a little pond by the camp

and copulated and squawked all night long."

Oppenheimer chain-smoked nervously

and sat quietly reading the French poet Baudelaire.

OPPENHEIMER: Seductive twilight,

the criminal's friend.

Silent like a wolf.

The sky is closing down.

A dark cloth drawn across an alcove.

Where the impatient man changes

into a beast of prey.

NARRATOR: At 5:10, the countdown began

at zero minus 20 minutes.

As loudspeakers ticked off the time at five-minute intervals,

Oppenheimer wandered in and out of the control bunker,

glancing up at the sky.

At the two-minute mark,

he was heard to say to himself,

"Lord, these affairs are hard on the heart."

Minus one minute.

Minus 55 seconds.

ROBERT CHRISTY, Physicist: We were given a piece of welder's glass

to hold in front of our eyes,

so that we could look at it without being blinded.

It was pitch-dark outside, just before dawn.

A lot of tension.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer lay on his stomach, his face dreamy, withdrawn.

"He grew tenser as the last seconds ticked off,"

an Army general remembered.

"He scarcely breathed.

"For the last few seconds,

he stared directly ahead."

(explosion)

ROBERT CHRISTY, Physicist: There was a brilliant flash like daylight outside.

Suddenly, from pitch-dark to daylight over a huge area.

There was this rapidly expanding glowing sphere

with swirling, dark clouds in it.

And finally as it dimmed, you could see on the outside

a faint blue glow.

It was simply fantastic.

NARRATOR: "It worked," was all that Oppenheimer said.

"It worked."

ROY J. GLAUBER, Physicist: We were just awestruck.

There it was. It had happened.

The test was evidently a success.

But we had no idea when the next thing would happen.

Nobody had said to us

that a bomb had already been shipped out.

There was total silence,

fear and tension.

Now we're into something.

Now who knows what's going to ensue?

We heard not a single word

until the sixth of August.

(explosion)

NARRATOR: On August 6, 1945,

the United States exploded an atomic bomb over Hiroshima,

a city with a population of 350,000.

Even before the blast,

Oppenheimer had been darkly mourning.

"Those poor little people," he said.

"Those poor little people."

Yet, he had given the military precise instructions

to ensure that the weapon would be delivered on target.

"No radar bombing," he wrote.

"It must be dropped visually.

"Don't let them detonate it too high

or the target won't get as much damage."

Oppenheimer was of two minds.

His success had been exhilarating,

but he was in anguish over the human costs.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: There's no doubt that there was ambivalence about it.

I think Oppenheimer saw the question in all its complexity.

It wasn't so simple as,

"Was he guilty about building such a weapon?"

He understood that the bomb was going to change history.

He might have hoped that there was some other way

to demonstrate its effectiveness.

They knew what they were making.

They knew it was going to kill a lot of people.

They didn't like that aspect of it,

but there you were.

(explosion)

NARRATOR: The second atomic bomb,

exploded over Nagasaki on August 9,

left him morose, consumed by doubts,

fast sinking into depression.

"This undertaking," he wrote a friend,

"has not been without its misgivings.

"They are heavy on us today,

"when the future,

"which has so many elements of high promise,

is yet only a stone's throw from despair."

"Some of you will have seen photographs

of the Nagasaki strike,"

he told the American Philosophical Society

three months after the blast.

"Seen the great steel girders of factories

twisted and wrecked."

"Atomic weapons are weapons of aggression,

"of surprise, and of terror.

"If they are ever used again,

"it may well be by the thousands,

or perhaps by the tens of thousands."

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: He was a great supporter of using the bomb,

but he understood all along

that he was on the cusp of a new terror...

...even at the moment

when the scientists believed

that there was no other choice.

They knew that most of the people killed were civilians.

They knew that the targets

for these bombs were the centers of cities.

It's a very heavy burden

that he carries into the postwar period,

after Hiroshima and Nagasaki are destroyed.

I have been asked whether in the years to come,

it will be possible to kill 40 million American people

in the 20 largest American towns

by the use of atomic bombs in a single night.

I am afraid that the answer to that question is yes.

NARRATOR: In 1945,

America was the only country in the world

with the atomic bomb.

President Harry Truman believed that national security

depended on keeping nuclear technology secret.

Oppenheimer, along with nearly every other nuclear scientist,

disagreed.

OPPENHEIMER, (TV Archive): I have been asked whether there is hope for the nation's security

in keeping secret some of the knowledge

which has gone into the making of the bombs.

I am afraid there is no such hope.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: President Truman really did seem to feel

that if you just kept the lid on enough,

we'd always have the secret

and no one else would ever get it.

There wasn't any secret.

The secret was it worked.

NARRATOR: On October 25, 1945,

Oppenheimer met with President Truman

to share his concerns.

When the president assured his visitor

that the Soviets would never get the bomb,

Oppenheimer became frustrated.

"Mr. President," he said,

"I feel I have blood on my hands."

"Blood on his hands," Truman complained later.

"Damn it, he hasn't half as much blood on his hands as I have.

You just don't go around bellyaching about it."

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: It's not surprising

Truman just about threw him out of his office.

It was the president's decision.

It wasn't Oppenheimer's decision.

NARRATOR: Later, Truman told his secretary of state,

"I don't want to see that son of a bitch in this office again."

In the years after the war,

Robert Oppenheimer's fame grew.

His name became a household word.

He was "the father of the A-bomb,"

the government's top advisor on atomic weapons,

privy to all the nation's atomic secrets.

HERBERT YORK, Physicist: He was instantly famous.

Nuclear weapons, nuclear energy

and new things

such a surprise to nearly everyone,

that it was very widespread

to ask your local physicists,

"What does this all mean and what should we do?"

You know the Rotary clubs did it,

the Kiwanis did it, the PTAs, I mean, everybody.

And not only that, whenever there was a...

anything in the papers about it,

it was always a "brilliant nuclear physicist."

There was no other kind.

Now, Oppenheimer was right at the top of it,

so it was the president or the Congress

or the senators or the UN,

you know, who asked him,

and for whom he gave his advice.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: He was interested in power.

He was drawn to it.

He wanted to have a say in what became of those weapons.

He wasn't going to go back down on the farm

after he'd seen Paris.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: He realized that he might turn this fame and power

into statesmanship.

That he might become the sort of philosopher-scientist,

and philosopher-statesman,

who could bring the rest of the message to government

about how you go about eliminating

nuclear weapons in the world.

Oppenheimer was naive in that.

He really thought that if he got inside,

he could change things.

Immediately after the war,

I was deeply involved in the effort

to devise effective means

for the international control of atomic weapons.

NARRATOR: In 1946, Oppenheimer hammered out the details

of a visionary proposal

with some of America's most distinguished statesmen.

The plan was designed to put atomic energy

into the hands of an international agency,

controlling uranium mines, atomic power plants

and atomic laboratories.

HERBERT YORK, Physicist: It involved giving up nuclear weapons

and internationalizing the entire nuclear enterprise.

And Oppenheimer writes,

"We know that people will say, 'This is impossible.

You can't do this.'

Our answer is, 'We must.'"

NARRATOR: But Oppenheimer's hope for an international accord

that would lead to the elimination of nuclear weapons

was facing fierce resistance,

foundering on the deepening antagonisms

between two former allies:

the Soviet Union and the United States.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: Oppenheimer believed that

if we could figure out

how to create a postwar period

in which the foundation of international affairs

was U.S. - Soviet cooperation,

the world would be a very different place.

NARRATOR: But the Soviet Army already occupied much of Eastern Europe.

Americans feared that Western Europe might be overrun.

Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin had fears of his own.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: The Soviet Union was not about to let the United States

have a monopoly on these weapons.

They didn't trust us,

with reason. We had, after all,

built a weapon in secret,

telling our allies, Great Britain, but not telling our allies, the Soviet Union

and actually used the thing

on an enemy population.

Stalin had every reason to believe

that we would use it on him.

NARRATOR: In the face of opposition

from both the Soviets and the Americans,

Oppenheimer's plan to internationalize nuclear energy

went nowhere.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: So, it was a brilliant and radical

and evidently premature idea.

Because national sovereignty trumped everything.

(explosion)

NARRATOR: On July 1, 1946,

the United States tested a 21,000-ton atomic bomb,

exploding it in Bikini Atoll in the Pacific Ocean.

Two months before, Oppenheimer had written President Truman

a letter opposing the tests.

Truman paid no attention,

calling Oppenheimer "that crybaby scientist."

By now, Oppenheimer was disillusioned

with America's efforts

to eliminate the threat of nuclear weapons,

but he was even more disillusioned with the Russians.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: He saw how intransigent the Russians were going to be,

and he went into another mode

in his thinking about what should be done about the bomb.

He felt that what you had to do...

instead of you had to accomplish the impossible,

what you had to do was accomplish another impossibility,

and that is live successfully and peacefully

with nuclear weapons.

NARRATOR: That fall, Oppenheimer was made a key advisor

to the newly created Atomic Energy Commission.

As chairman of its General Advisory Committee,

he reached what he described as a "melancholy" conclusion.

OPPENHEIMER: As the prospects of success receded

and as the evidence of Soviet hostility

and growing military power accumulated,

we were more and more to devote ourselves

to finding ways of adapting our atomic potential to offset the Soviet threat.

We concluded that the principal job of the Commission

was to provide atomic weapons

and good atomic weapons

and many atomic weapons.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer was now a scientific statesman.

He had little time to be a scientist.

After the war, he had given up teaching

to become the director of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton,

a center for theoretical research,

renowned as the home of the most famous scientist in the world,

Albert Einstein.

But Oppenheimer rarely did any research himself anymore.

He published only a few scientific papers,

and after 1950, never published one again.

FREEMAN DYSON, Physicist: And that was a great grief to him.

He had had dreams of getting back into science and

doing something great while he was here.

His wife, Kitty, begged me if I couldn't actually work with Robert and

actually do some science with him,

and I never could.

Some... you know, it was...

he never got down to the nitty-gritty.

He was older.

What, he was 40?

He was past the age when people do their best scientific work.

NARRATOR: The popular press continued to depict him

as a scientist on the cutting edge

and a model American,

a happily married man with two small children

and a German shepherd called Buddy.

No one knew that he was under close surveillance by the FBI

because of his past ties to the Communist Party.

J. EDGAR HOOVER, (Archive): Communists have been,

still are, and always will be

a menace to freedom, to democratic ideals,

to the worship of God, and to America's way of life.

NARRATOR: With America's relationship with Russia deteriorating,

the fear of Communism seemed to be spreading everywhere,

and FBI director J. Edgar Hoover

continued to find Oppenheimer suspicious,

in spite of Oppenheimer's leadership at Los Alamos

and his immense reputation.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: There were periods in which there was a letup,

but the FBI started to follow

and surveil Oppenheimer in about 1940, 1941,

and never stopped.

Never stopped.

NARRATOR: As the Soviets tightened their grip on Eastern Europe,

the hunt for Communist spies

was becoming a national obsession.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: Looked at from outside,

the United States was the most powerful country in the world,

but in the U.S.,

there was this awareness that the Russians had walked all over Eastern Europe

and that Communism was being foisted

on the peoples of those countries,

and that was terrifying to the American public.

And it wasn't long before there were politicians

who learned to exploit that fear.

NARRATOR: The House Un-American Activities Committee

had begun investigating what they called

the Communist threat to the American way of life.

In June 1949, it subpoenaed Oppenheimer.

The famous scientist tried to charm the congressmen.

When they asked, he confirmed the names of Communist Party members.

Some had been his students.

Later, he said that his nerve just gave way.

FREEMAN DYSON, Physicist: It looked as though he was just trying to save his own skin by

incriminating the students.

To me, it was horrible.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: He must have sensed that the flames could

get to him sometime.

And it wasn't clear to him what he should do.

NARRATOR: That same June, Oppenheimer appeared before Congress again,

but this time, made a formidable enemy.

Lewis Strauss

was the president of the Institute for Advanced Study.

He had hired Oppenheimer as its director.

Strauss was also a member of the Atomic Energy Commission.

A self-made millionaire, ambitious, proud,

fiercely anti-Communist, he did not like to be crossed.

"If you disagree with Lewis about anything,"

a fellow atomic energy commissioner said,

"he assumes you're just a fool at first,

"but if you go on disagreeing with him,

he concludes you must be a traitor."

Oppenheimer and Strauss clashed over a minor issue

at a congressional hearing,

and Strauss never forgave him.

OPPENHEIMER,(Archival): My opinion is that if the determination were made

that isotopes should not be shipped abroad,

the Congress will be making a profound mistake.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer was testifying in support

of exporting radioisotopes to Europe

while Strauss looked on, seething.

Strauss violently disagreed,

fearing that the isotopes might fall into the hands of Russia.

In a reckless display of arrogance,

Oppenheimer aimed a jibe directly at Strauss,

telling the congressmen that radioisotopes

were no more dangerous than a shovel or a bottle of beer.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: And everybody laughed,

and a journalist said he looked over at Lewis Strauss,

who had turned beet red.

He had never seen so much hate and anger

on anyone's face as he saw on Strauss's face at that moment.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: Strauss was very sensitive to criticism.

If he didn't like people,

he dealt with them.

And he had a long memory.

He could deal with them a long time afterward,

um, if he wanted to.

(explosion)

NARRATOR: On August 29, 1949,

the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb.

America was still the most powerful nation on earth,

but the confidence of many of its citizens was shattered.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: There was near-hysteria in Washington.

People were running around screaming, "The sky is falling."

Now, why would they do that?

If you've got all of your eggs in the basket that it's a secret,

and then the secret is lost,

then of course you think you've lost everything.

NARRATOR: The day the test made headlines,

Oppenheimer received a call from an agitated Edward Teller.

"What should I do now?" Teller wanted to know.

"Keep your shirt on," Oppenheimer told him.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: From Teller's point of view, there was a balance of forces

between us and the Soviet Union in Europe.

They had four million men on the ground in Eastern Europe,

and we had the bomb.

Now, suddenly, they had four million men on the ground in Europe,

we had the bomb, and they had the bomb,

so the balance of forces was upset.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: He hated the Soviet Union.

He grew up in Hungary,

and Communism was a four-letter word,

so he thought the only way you could deal with the Soviet Union was

to have more bombs than they did,

that they would be influenced by force

and by nothing else.

NARRATOR: Teller believed he had the answer to the Soviet threat:

the Super, the hydrogen bomb,

which had remained his pet project ever since Los Alamos.

It was up to Oppenheimer and his General Advisory Committee

to recommend to the Atomic Energy Commission

whether or not to try and create

the most awesome weapon of mass destruction ever devised.

OPPENHEIMER: A good many people came to me

or called me or wrote me letters about the Super program.

It was not clear to me what the right thing to do was.

Was it crash development, the most rapid possible

development and construction of the Super?

NARRATOR: The debate over the H-bomb sparked a controversy

fraught with danger for the unsuspecting scientist.

Ever since he war had ended,

Teller had been trying to convince

any high official who would listen

that the Super would keep Americans safe.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: He thought that if we didn't develop it,

the Russians surely would,

and we would be at their mercy.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: He thought that it would be crazy not to develop it

and then those who opposed it might possibly be unpatriotic.

NARRATOR: But Oppenheimer and the General Advisory Committee worried more

about the destructive power of the H-bomb

than they did about the Russians.

They voted eight to zero against it.

There was a surprising unanimity,

to me, very surprising,

that the United States ought not to take the initiative

in an all-out program

for the development of thermonuclear weapons.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: The committee concluded

that it shouldn't be built,

because this was a weapon of genocide

that had absolutely no military necessity,

and that our stockpile of atomic bombs

was a sufficient deterrent.

NARRATOR: The debate seemed to be over.

Oppenheimer, along with some of the country's

most experienced nuclear scientists,

had rendered their opinion,

but President Truman,

fearing the Russians would develop an H-bomb first,

dismissed it.

(explosion)

On November 1, 1952,

the world's first hydrogen bomb explosion

vaporized the tiny island of Elugelab in the Pacific.

HAROLD AGNEW, Physicist: It became a great big lagoon.

It just went away.

And the whole water around it was milky white.

It was scary.

The heat from this thing was really very frightening.

It started getting hotter and hotter and hotter and hotter.

This is almost 30 miles away.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: These were no longer weapons that were military devices.

They were simply weapons of mass destruction

on the most terrible scale.

Well, let's take New York.

The blast would destroy the entire greater New York area.

The fallout would take out the rest of the East Coast.

One bomb.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: It meant that a new era of warfare was upon us.

We now had in our possession

a weapon of genocide, not just warfare.

The modern arms race started

with the invention of the hydrogen bomb,

and after which, it was escalation all the way.

OPPENHEIMER: If the development by the enemy,

as well as by us, of thermonuclear weapons

could have been averted,

I think we would be in a somewhat safer world today

than we are.

God knows, not entirely safe,

because atomic bombs are not jolly, either.

NARRATOR: Once the decision was made,

Oppenheimer did nothing to oppose it.

Frustrated,

he considered leaving the government altogether,

but instead, played the loyal soldier.

Later, Oppenheimer's lack of enthusiasm

would be interpreted as outright opposition.

Did you, subsequent to the president's decision

of January 1950,

ever express any opposition

to the production of the hydrogen bomb

on moral grounds?

I would think I could very well have said,

"This is a dreadful weapon,"

or something like that.

Why do you think that you could very well have said that?

Because I have always thought it was a dreadful weapon.

Even if from a technical point of view,

it was a sweet and lovely and beautiful job,

I have still thought it was a dreadful weapon.

And have said so?

I would assume I have said so, yes.

You mean,

you had a moral revulsion

against the production

of such a dreadful weapon?

This is too strong.

Beg pardon?

That is too strong.

Which is too strong, the weapon or my expression?

Your expression.

I had grave concern and anxiety.

You had moral qualms about it.

Is that accurate?

Let us leave the word "moral" out of it.

You had qualms about it.

How could one not have qualms about it?

I know no one who doesn't have qualms about it.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Oppenheimer wasn't opposed to building nuclear weapons.

He was just opposed to building

huge nuclear weapons

that wouldn't... that were bigger than the targets.

(rapid gunfire)

NARRATOR: In 1950,

the United States went to war in Korea.

Soon, Americans were fighting

both Korean and Chinese communists,

while the Russians seemed to be growing

increasingly belligerent.

Oppenheimer knew

that America's military planned a devastating response

to any Soviet attack.

In 1951,

he was shown the Air Force's top-secret strategic war plan.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: The plan was that we would

bomb our way across Eastern Europe with nuclear weapons.

We would then destroy the Soviet Union,

and then as a kind of an extra,

we'd go on and destroy China, because, after all, it was a Communist country.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: The American government was planning,

in its nuclear weapons response to any Soviet attack,

to kill 200 and something million people

within a week or two.

I mean, Oppenheimer just felt that this was madness,

sheer madness.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer spoke out for moderation.

He took a stand against building nuclear-powered aircraft

and submarines,

and advocated open discussion of the growing arms race.

It is a grave danger for us

that these decisions are taken

on the basis of facts held secret.

If we are guided by fear alone,

we'll fail in this time of crisis.

NARRATOR: But powerful Washington insiders

believed he was standing in the way

of America's ability to defend itself.

They were led by Lewis Strauss.

With the election of Dwight Eisenhower to the presidency,

Strauss became the chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission.

He now had the power to build a case

to rid the government of the influential scientist.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Strauss would deliberately destroy the name and reputation

and government position of Robert Oppenheimer.

And when he destroyed something, he destroyed it thoroughly.

NARRATOR: Strauss began by orchestrating a campaign

in America's most popular news magazines,

alleging that Oppenheimer was undermining

the nation's atomic weapons program.

The stories depicted Edward Teller

as a scientific patriot.

Teller readily joined the crusade against his old boss.

He had long wanted to remove Oppenheimer from public life.

In 1951, he told the FBI that

"a lot of people believe Oppenheimer opposed the development of the hydrogen bomb,

on direct orders from Moscow."

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: Teller sincerely believed

that we were in a dangerous arms race with the Russians

and that Oppenheimer was standing in the way

of protecting the country against this dreaded foe.

I think he may well have sincerely believed that.

And I'm sure for Teller,

it was also a very personal jealousy.

Oppenheimer likes his bomb, but he doesn't like my bomb.

I know that sounds absurd,

and yet, I have no doubt that it was part of the equation.

So, get rid of him, and then Teller,

like cream, would rise to the top of the bottle.

They needed to get Oppenheimer out of the way

so that Strauss and Teller could realign the physics community

around the dream of building new and better bombs.

(explosion)

NARRATOR: Late in August 1953,

the Russians exploded what the press called a hydrogen bomb.

The news seemed to confirm what Americans feared.

Their nuclear secrets were being stolen.

Two years before,

reports that Soviet agents had penetrated Los Alamos

and passed atomic secrets to the Russians

under Oppenheimer's watch had stunned them.

Convinced that America was vulnerable,

many began searching for someone to blame.

One Communist on the faculty

of one university is one Communist too many.

NARRATOR: The reputations and careers of loyal citizens

in universities, businesses and government

were already being ruined.

Are you a member of the Communist conspiracy as of this moment?

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: People were really convinced that tomorrow,

Soviets were going to take over America,

and they were convinced that it would be because of internal subversion,

not because of external activity,

but because we had spies,

and they were destroying the American way.

NARRATOR: The former executive director

of the congressional Joint Committee on Atomic Energy

was convinced that Oppenheimer was one of them.

William Borden had harbored doubts about Oppenheimer for years

and shared his suspicions with Strauss.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: Borden is a natural ally of Lewis Strauss.

And Strauss allows Borden

to take Oppenheimer's security file home,

and Borden studies it for months,

and writes this letter to J. Edgar Hoover.

NARRATOR: Borden outlined a series of charges

against Oppenheimer.

He concluded with an accusation that went off like a bombshell.

"More probably than not," Borden wrote,

"J. Robert Oppenheimer is an agent of the Soviet Union."

Hoover forwarded the letter to the White House.

The President called in Lewis Strauss

to help him decide what to do.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: Strauss convinces Eisenhower that

if this letter was sat on by the administration,

it would cost Eisenhower politically,

and Eisenhower declares

that a wall should be put between Oppenheimer and secrecy.

NARRATOR: On December 21, 1953, Strauss told Oppenheimer

that his security clearance had been suspended.

The country's most famous authority on atomic weapons,

"the father of the A-bomb," was stunned.

He fell into a "despairing state of mind,"

a friend remembered.

The following evening, after meeting with his lawyers

and more than one drink,

he fainted on the bathroom floor.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: When he began to think about

the consequences of what he was facing,

I think, he realized that he was in

deep, deep trouble for the first time in his life.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: Oppenheimer realized that he was going to pay.

I think he had the tragic sense.

He understood the drama that he had to play out,

even though he later called it a farce.

NARRATOR: The hearings were enveloped

in an atmosphere of fierce anti-Communism.

GORDON GRAY, US Special Counsel: It was reported that in 1940,

you were listed as a sponsor of the Friends of the Chinese People,

an organization characterized by the House Committee on Un-American Activities

as a Communist-front organization.

NARRATOR: At stake was a man's dignity

and the role that nuclear weapons would play

in America's military strategy.

GORDON GRAY, US Special Counsel: It was reported that you strongly opposed

the hydrogen bomb on moral grounds,

and by claiming that it was not feasible

and not politically desirable.

And even after it was determined to proceed,

you continued to oppose the project.

NARRATOR: Confronted with charges that could ruin his reputation,

Oppenheimer himself insisted on the hearing

despite the warnings of some of his friends.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Oppenheimer couldn't see tucking tail and walking away.

What would that say about the charges against him?

On the other hand, it's too bad he didn't understand

what sort of forces he was up against.

NARRATOR: With no credible evidence

to prove that Oppenheimer had put America's security at risk,

Prosecutor Roger Robb would have to wear the scientist down,

force him into contradictions, confuse and embarrass him.

Your brother Frank told you in 1936, probably in 1937,

that he and his wife Jackie had joined the Communist Party.

Did he ask your advice about it?

Oh, Lord, no.

He had taken the step.

I had confidence in his decency and straightforwardness

and in his loyalty to me.

Tell us the test that you applied to acquire

the confidence that you have spoken of.

In the case of a brother, one doesn't make tests;

at least I didn't.

Well...

I knew my brother.

When did you decide that your brother was no longer

a member of the party and no longer dangerous?

I never regarded my brother as dangerous.

NARRATOR: Robb was an experienced trial lawyer,

but Lewis Strauss wasn't taking any chances.

The hearings turned into a trial in which Strauss made the rules.

Strauss selected the judges,

kept the defense from seeing all the relevant documents

and from knowing in advance which witnesses would be called.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: They are in a war against Communism

and, therefore, the normal rules of justice

have to be set aside

in order to protect the body politic.

NARRATOR: Strauss even broke the law to get his man.

The FBI bugged Oppenheimer's lawyer's offices,

his home,

nearly everywhere he went,

then passed the information along to the prosecutor.

The defense strategy was known to the prosecution in advance.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: It was the worst kind of kangaroo court.

They had them ten ways to Sunday.

OPPENHEIMER (on record): There were approaches to other people who were troubled by them

and sometimes they came and discussed them with me.

And that's as far as I can go on that.

NARRATOR: Unknown to Oppenheimer or his lawyer,

Robb had discovered the secret recording

of Oppenheimer's conversation

with Army Intelligence Officer Colonel Pash.

He carefully studied the transcript

and prepared a trap to catch Oppenheimer in a lie.

ROGER ROBB, Courtroom Prosecutor: Did Chevalier tell you or indicate to you in any way

that he had talked to anyone but you about this matter?

No.

You are sure about that?

Yes.

Did you learn

from anybody else or hear

that Chevalier had approached anyone but you

about this matter?

No.

You are sure about that?

That is right.

Doctor, I would like to read from the transcript

of your interview with Colonel Pash.

"There were approaches to other people

"who were troubled by them,

"and sometimes came and discussed them with me.

That's as far as I can go on that."

Do you recall saying something like that?

I don't recall that conversation very well.

I can only rely on the transcript.

Doctor, for your information,

I might say that we have a record of your voice.

Sure.

Do you have any doubt that you said that?

No.

So as to be clear,

did you discuss with or disclose to Pash

the identity of Chevalier?

No.

Let us refer to him then, for the time being, as "X."

All right.

Didn't you say that X had approached three people?

Probably.

Why did you do that, Doctor?

Because I was an idiot.

Is that your only explanation, Doctor?

I was reluctant to mention Chevalier.

Yes?

No doubt somewhat reluctant to mention myself.

So you told Pash

that there were several people that were contacted.

Right.

And your testimony now

is that was a lie?

Right.

That wasn't true?

That is right.

You did, you are sure,

tell Colonel Pash

there was more than one person involved.

This whole thing is a pure fabrication

except for the one name Eltenton.

Why did you go to such great

circumstantial detail about this thing

if you knew

it was a cock-and-bull story?

I fear this whole thing is a piece of idiocy.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: Oppenheimer was up against a kind of psychological torture.

He was broken down by a very, very skillful prosecutor,

made to look stupid...

made to look like a fool.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: The purpose in proving him a liar

was to impress the hearing board

that he couldn't be trusted

and that they should declare him a security risk.

It had to be totally humiliating

and destroy his confidence in himself.

He's being told

that he's a liar, untrustworthy, unworthy,

and he folded.

OPPENHEIMER: The story I told Pash is not a true story.

There were not three or more people involved.

I believe I can do no more

than say that the story I told is a false story.

It is not easy to say that.

Now, when you ask as to why I did this,

other than that I was an idiot,

I am going to have more trouble being understandable.

I found myself, I believe, trying to give a tip

to the intelligence people without realizing

that when you give a tip, you must tell the whole story.

But I am, in any case, solemnly testifying

that there was no conspiracy in what I knew

and what I know of this matter.

I wish I could explain to you better why I falsified and fabricated.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: The trial proved to him his worst fears.

Oppenheimer had been troubled all his life about who he was.

He later said that he was repulsive to himself.

The trial said that he had defects of character,

that he was not a good human being,

and unfortunately he agreed.

NARRATOR: Oppenheimer testified for 27 hours.

A parade of witnesses was called on both sides.

He looked wan, demoralized

by the time Edward Teller took the stand.

Teller drove the final nail into Oppenheimer's coffin.

EDWARD TELLER (dramatized): I thoroughly disagreed with Dr. Oppenheimer

in numerous issues, and his actions, frankly,

appeared to me confused and complicated.

I feel that I would like to

see the vital interests of this country

in hands which I understand better

and therefore trust more.

I would feel personally more secure

if public matters would rest in other hands.

I'm sorry.

After what you've just said...

I don't know what you mean.

NARRATOR: The hearing lasted nearly four weeks.

In his closing remarks, Oppenheimer's lawyer warned,

"America must not devour her own children."

GORDON GRAY, US Special Counsel: We find that Dr. Oppenheimer's continuing conduct

and associations have reflected a serious disregard

for the requirements of the security system.

We have found a susceptibility to influence,

which could have serious implications

for the security interests of the country.

We find his conduct in the hydrogen bomb program

sufficiently disturbing.

We have regretfully concluded

that Dr. Oppenheimer has been less than candid

in several instances in his testimony.

NARRATOR: By a vote of two to one,

the board concluded that, although Oppenheimer was a loyal citizen,

his security clearance should be revoked.

Numb and bewildered, Oppenheimer told a friend,

"I have so little sense of self remaining."

In a futile gesture, he appealed to the Atomic Energy Commission,

chaired by Lewis Strauss.

The Commission upheld the verdict, four to one.

JEREMY BERNSTEIN: I took a train ride with him to New York,

and for some reason, he started talking about "my case."

"My Case."

And he said to me

that at the time, he thought it was happening to somebody else.

PRISCILLA J. McMILLAN, Writer: He wasn't accused in the course of the hearing

of having ever betrayed a secret.

It was about getting Oppenheimer

out of the security councils of the U.S. government.

NARRATOR: America's most influential voice for nuclear moderation

had been stilled.

MARTIN SHERWIN, Historian: The Oppenheimer hearing was a political battle

between the Strauss view--

"We need more and more and more nuclear weapons"--

and the Oppenheimer view that nuclear weapons are

a part of our defense,

but we have to, you know, use them sensibly

and we can't rely on them totally.

That hearing had a profound effect on the nuclear arms race.

It essentially opened the floodgates.

It removed the legitimacy of criticism

against more and more nuclear weapons.

NARRATOR: In 1954, the year of the Oppenheimer hearings,

America had some 300 nuclear weapons.

By the end of the 20th century,

the United States would have at the ready more than 70,000.

We built so many more than we ever needed,

and the Soviets followed suit.

NARRATOR: In 1954, Robert Oppenheimer turned 50.

His security clearance had been revoked.

His connection to the government had been severed.

He would live for 13 more years, but he was never the same man.

ROBERT CHRISTY, Physicist: He had been a strong, forceful leader before that,

and he was a beaten man afterwards.

RICHARD RHODES, Writer: He gave lectures on science and its interaction with humanity.

He continued to direct the Institute for Advanced Study.

He became what Yeats calls a smiling public man.

MARVIN L. GOLDBERGER, Physicist: I saw a lot of him at that time,

and I saw the impact that this tragedy had on him.

I can't recall ever seeing him happy,

you know, just relaxed and having fun.

I don't have the feeling that he ever felt good about himself

and if he was ever in any sense at peace with himself.

NARRATOR: In 1963,

Oppenheimer received what many saw as an official apology.

President Lyndon Johnson presented him

with one of the nation's highest scientific honors:

the Fermi Award from the Atomic Energy Commission.

With countless other men and women,

we are engaged in this great enterprise of our time,

testing whether men can live without war

as the great arbiter of history.

I think it's just possible, Mr. President,

that it has taken some character and some courage

for you to make this award today.

NARRATOR: Edward Teller was there that day,

come to offer his congratulations.

When he extended his hand,

once again, Oppenheimer shook it.

After the ceremony,

Lewis Strauss wrote an angry letter to Life magazine,

complaining that honoring Oppenheimer

"dealt a severe blow

to the security system which protects our country."

Robert Oppenheimer died four years later.

He was 62.

In those twilight years,

he seldom returned to the New Mexico where he had come to feel at peace.

When he was 24,

he had written a poem inspired by the wilderness he loved so well

and the allure of death.

OPPENHEIMER: It was evening when we came to the river

With a low moon over the desert

That we had lost in the mountains, forgotten,

What with the cold and the sweating

And the ranges barring the sky.

We waited a long time in silence.

Then, we heard the oars creaking, and afterwards,

I remember the boatman called to us.

We did not look back at the mountains.

There's more American Experience at pbs.org.

American Experience: "The Trials of J. Robert Oppenheimer"

is available on DVD.

To order: