All language subtitles for Deep.Space.S03E01.Unfolding.Superluminal.Tech.1080p.AMZN.WEB-DL.DDP2.0.H.264-FLUX_track3_[eng]

>> Maximum warp.

Punch It!

>> Warp drive is one of the
fundamental features of many

science fiction dramas today.

And the idea of somehow
counteracting gravity in order

to travel to distant stars
and planets in record time

is one of our greatest
collective dreams.

Is warp speed travel
actually feasible?

And if so, has it already
been accomplished?

>> We're at runway
06 and still 2-5.

>> On December 16, 2017, two
videos emerged on the internet

that showed Navy pilots
encountering mysterious

spherical objects that move
through the air in ways that

mystified experts.

>> My gosh, there's a
whole fleet of them.

Look on the SA.

They're all going
against the wind.

The wind's 120 knot to the west.

>> What the hell is that?

A moving target?

>> A third video,
released in March 2018,

depicted a similar encounter.

>> Look at that thing.

It's rotating.

>> These three videos are
referred to as Flir1, Gimbal,

and GoFast.

>> Oh my gosh, man.

Wow.

Look at it fly!

>> Years earlier, the videos
captured by a US Navy FA-18

Super Hornet documents an
incident that occurred in 2004

known as the
"Nimitz" Encounters,

so named for the fighter
pilots of "USS Nimitz"

Carrier Strike Group who spotted
the mysterious flying bodies.

>> 2.5 dB.

>> The pilots
reported a strange,

shaped object resembling the
popular Tic Tac breath mint

about 100 miles off
the coast of San Diego.

What makes these particular
videos so significant

is the fact that
in September 2019,

the official spokesperson
for the Deputy

Chief of Naval Operations
for Information Warfare

confirmed publicly--

>> The Navy designates the
objects contained in these

videos as unidentified
aerial phenomena.

>> While that statement alone
is of historical significance,

what the videos themselves
suggest is remarkable.

Ongoing incursions of
unidentified aerial phenomena,

or UAPs, are being captured
on video by the US Navy

that maneuver in ways
that are impossible

for any current, acknowledged
aviation technology.

Might this be a smoking gun
for advanced exotic propulsion

systems or might these
craft be evidence

of extraterrestrial
technology from off planet?

>> When I'm looking at the
Flir videos, for example,

that were released by the Navy,
what I'm seeing is something

that has a couple
of characteristics.

The one characteristic
that stands out the most

is that it has no
flight surfaces, right?

When you want something
to fly in the air,

you need it to follow
the laws of aerodynamics.

It needs to have wings.

It needs to generate lift.

It needs to be able to
work against gravity.

So it needs to reduce
its drag, and so on.

Now secondly, they also don't
seem to leave any propulsion

signature.

So I'm not seeing any
sort of exhaust coming out

of them like you would expect.

So it's literally defying
the laws of physics

as we know them.

And it's outmaneuvering
our pilots.

That is a very fascinating
and incredibly mind-blowing.

>> Roger that.

>> Commander David Fravor was
leading a training exercise

from the "USS Nimitz" Carrier
Strike Group when the incident

occurred.

"The New York Times" reported
in an interview with Fravor

that the objects appeared
suddenly at 80,000 feet

and then hurtled toward the
sea, stopping at 20,000 feet

and just remained hovering.

Then it either dropped
out of radar range

or shot straight back up.

>> It accelerated like
nothing I've ever seen.

I have no idea what I saw.

It had no plumes, wings, or
rotors, and outran our F-18s.

>> When these craft clearly
demonstrate unconventional

flight dynamics, there are a
number of hypotheses as to how

they might be
accomplishing this.

>> Even though the
Tic Tac seems to be--

from an outside observer--
seems to be moving at, say,

20,000 miles an hour, it's
not generating any friction.

Like when a rocket comes
into the earth's atmosphere,

the reentry problem
and it heats up.

That doesn't happen
with Tic Tac.

See, that doesn't
happen with the Tic Tac.

The way warp drive is it's
like surfing on a wave.

The wave is the curvature of
space, the rippling of space.

So the surfer is
not really moving

relative to the
water he's around,

he's moving with the water.

That's the way
the Tic Tac moves.

But it's controlling the
way the space is warping.

See, it's controlling its path.

And it does it with
small amounts of energy.

So the hardest thing
for people to understand

is that when you see a
flying saucer or a Tic Tac,

it's not an ordinary vehicle
that's moving through air.

It's controlling the
gravitational field right

around its fuselage.

For example, if the Tic Tac
wants to move to the east--

let's say, if it
moves to the east--

what it does, it's able to
contract the space in its nose

and expand the
space in its tail.

It's folding space, sitting
still in space really.

But to the outside observer,
it looks as if it's moving.

>> Warp drive, as
the name implies,

relies on warping space so that
you're stretching space on one

end of your ship and expanding
it by a lot on the other.

So you're zipping
through space-time.

That's how I like to imagine it.

However, anti-gravity
propulsion is different.

Anti-gravity is
where you can create

your own gravitational field
that essentially repels

or cancels the gravitational
field that you're

being affected by.

>> Well with anti-gravity, the
big advantage that thing would

have is when you
encounter planets.

You can come and go
off of its surface

without having to fight all
the gravitational forces

of a planet, which
would cause you

to build your ships with
different propulsion systems.

If a warp drive system had
an anti-gravity system, that

would be real handy because
you use your warp drive to get

from place to place, switch
over to the anti-gravity

when you get inside a
gravity field of a planet,

and basically you will have
removed all the energy that's

involved with magnetism, such
as kinetic energy, momentum,

inertia, all that
would evaporate.

>> In his scientific paper, "Is
Low Power Warp Drive Possible,"

Dr. Jack Sarfatti posits the
idea that quantum metamaterials

may be used to produce low
power warp while staying true

to Einstein's general and
special theories of relativity.

Dr. Sarfatti believes he's
discovered a workable way

to fold space-time.

>> Warp drive is just a
very elementary application

of Einstein's general theory of
relativity of the gravitational

field.

And Einstein's field
equations basically

show how you can use an
applied electromagnetic field,

like a source, a pump.

And from that
electromagnetic field,

you can generate a
gravitational field.

The problem has been
that the coupling

between the
electromagnetic input

field and the induced
gravitational output field

is very weak.

I found a way to
make it very strong.

That's simply it, using what
are called metamaterials.

Metamaterials are
artificially made.

They're made by man.

They don't exist
naturally in nature.

They're just like lattices
of artificial atoms.

We make these artificial atoms.

They're called meta-atoms.

There are various
ways of making them.

I won't go into detail.

And we just construct them like
they're like a neural network,

just like lattices,
like crystals.

And these artificial atoms
are at definite positions

of the crystals.

And they have extraordinary
electromagnetic properties.

When we impose electricity--

so in magnetic fields,
in the metamaterials,

they could go into what are
called certain resonance

states.

And they can generate
strong gravitational fields.

So the metamaterials
is a way of generating,

inside the metamaterial,
a strong gravity

field from a very weak
electromagnetic field.

>> I think metamaterials are
very important to faster than

light UAPs, or just the idea
of UAPs for two reasons.

First of all, there was
the bismuth magnesium part

that was theorized
to be a metamaterial.

That really got people thinking
that, OK, maybe metamaterials

are an important part of UAPs.

So that's one line of thought.

The second line of
thought, though,

of why they would be
important, however,

is just intrinsically
for their value, right?

There's no way you can really
build advanced technology

that's manipulating electric
fields and, let's say,

coupling with the gravitational
field in some anomalous way

without at least being able
to intelligently manipulate

and control
electromagnetic waves,

so through vis-a-vis
metamaterials.

>> There's a whole bunch
of optical metamaterials.

But for a space
propulsion, they tend

to work at the
microwave frequencies.

And they were developing
microwave metamaterial.

Like the Boeing cube, for
example, developed by Boeing.

Interested Boeing was involved
in this classified work.

So why are they
working metamaterials?

Well, this is a connection.

It's possible, like
they talk about the arts

parts, the skin of the craft
that crashed in Roswell,

that it's layered material.

And that could act
as a metamaterial.

Theoretically, if you took a
5,000 terahertz beam, which

would probably in the far
infrared and aimed it at it,

you should get propulsion.

You should be able to move it.

So that's a form
of metamaterial.

It's basically layers
of magnesium and bismuth

that are spaced just right
to interact with this beam.

>> While the significance of
metamaterials is being explored

by scientists from
different perspectives, Dr.

Jack Sarfatti believes he
understands how to apply them

to the UAP discussion.

>> I've discovered, along
with other physicists,

mainly Keith Wanser, full
professor of Physics,

Cal State Fullerton, we
think we know, in principle,

how to increase the coupling
between electromagnetism

and gravity in order to
control the gravity field with

electromagnetism using
small amounts of energy.

The trick is in
metamaterials we can

make the effective speed
of light very tiny.

And by doing that, we
increase the coupling

between electricity
and magnetism

and the gravitational
field it creates.

So that's the trick.

We're playing with the
electromagnetic properties

of metamaterial to amplify
the effect of the input

electromagnetic field on the
gravitational field it creates.

>> They're all going
against the wind.

The wind's 120 knots to the west

>> We can then, with
theoretical physics,

can take a Tic Tac doing
a certain maneuver.

And then from that,
we can calculate

what kind of gravitational
field is required to do that.

>> Look at that thing!

>> It's rotating.

>> And then how much energy
do we have available?

And then we could design a
material that will do it.

You know, it's a
complicated thing,

but with teams of
scientists we can do it.

>> That raises the question, how
fundamental are metamaterials

to understanding
how UAPs maneuver?

>> It explains how
those things work.

It's pretty
elementary, actually.

But once you have
the right idea,

everything falls in place.

There's no mystery.

I am saying there's no mystery
as to how this technology

fundamentally works.

There's no mystery.

It's just, now, a matter
of engineering development

of the right kinds
of materials that we

could use to amplify the
effect of electromagnetism

in creating a
gravitational field.

That explains the
close encounters

of the "USS Nimitz,"
the "Roosevelt,"

and, apparently,
many other close

encounters that are
still classified.

>> And yet not everyone agrees.

Scientists find no
theoretical consensus

as to how this
technology functions.

>> When it comes to
describing how the physics

of the unidentified craft
that the "USS Nimitz"

encountered in 2004
and, in general,

the UAPs that the Navy
have been reporting.

I think that there is a
couple of good guesses

that I could present as
to how I think it's done.

And only time and empirical
scientific evidence

will truly tell
us how it's done.

But that being said, what
I believe is happening

is an extremely
controlled interaction

at the quantum level
between gravitons

and the rest of the
ship in such a way

that they can somehow control
that entire interaction better

than we can.

It has yet to be proven
that gravitons does exist.

I'm assuming they
do in this scenario.

So they're managing this
interface with space-time.

And that allows them to be
able to do multiple 1,000 G

maneuvers.

Whereas the average
F-18 would crush

under just 8-10 Gs of forces.

If the G-forces aren't
being felt and experienced

on the actual ship
and that they are only

measured and
experienced relative

to our frame of reference,
in that scenario,

the way that they
would be surviving

is what I guess would be
anti-gravity method one.

So that would be just canceling
the entire gravitational field

that they're experiencing.

So for them, it doesn't matter
how quickly they accelerate

left, right, up, or
down, they're calm

and still inside their ship.

That's what it would look like.

I think that we can
passively describe

what we're observing with
current classical physics

and just even today's
quantum physics,

but to truly explain the physics
behind what we're seeing,

we're going to have
to find new physics.

>> So I would prefer thinking
in terms of superluminal

propulsion.

And I'd deal more with the ether
rather than warping space-time.

The idea of warp
drive is based on more

of the conventional view of
space-time being warped somehow

and creating a gravity
gradient by warping space-time.

That's based in the general
relativity paradigm, which

I don't ascribe to because I
believe it's a failed paradigm

since it doesn't predict
electrogravitics, for example.

And there are other
replacements for it.

Superluminal propulsion
is using propulsion

to go faster than
the speed of light.

Well there's
various technologies

you could do to achieve this.

One is, for example,
Podkletnov's gravity impulse

beam.

He's achieved speeds
of the gravity waves

that his beam puts
out into the thousands

times the speed of light.

So if you use that
pushing on a spacecraft,

theoretically it could go
thousands of times speed

of light.

Another is Townsend Brown's
electric kinetic thrusters.

Those are less power
hungry, but the question

is would they be able to get
you over the speed of light.

The other technology involves
electogravitics, basically.

And with that, you
could go superluminal

with a minimum amount
of energy expenditure.

So I believe that's actually
the most reasonable to use.

His diagram is from
something I wrote up

in 1985 when I first discovered
about electrogravitics.

Here you see a
disk-like craft sort

of levitating in the midair.

And you see the pluses
and minuses on its hull

represent electric charges.

And we're talking about
very high voltages

here in the millions of volts.

Now this gets into
electrogravitics,

how you can create
gravitational potentials

using electric potentials.

This was discovered by
Townsend Brown at the beginning

of the 20th century.

T. Townsend Brown, best
known for the phenomena

called the Biefeld-Brown
Effect and electrogravitics,

was an American inventor
whose pioneering research

anti-gravity and
electric fields paved

the way for many other
scientists and researchers that

followed him.

>> In the physics I've been
developing called subquantum

kinetics, the important thing
that comes out of this--

that you don't see
it anywhere else,

not conventional physics
or any other theory--

is that negative charges
are anti-gravitic.

Very important to know because
with that just that concept,

you can create all
sorts of engineering

and space propulsion.

Positive charges
create gravity wells.

So when you charge
the capacitor,

you're creating a gravity
hill on the negative side

and a gravity well
on the positive side.

And you create, therefore,
a gravity gradient

through the capacitor
that propels it

in the direction of
the gravity well.

>> We seem to be so fixed on
action and reaction drives,

Newtonian physics,
and linear distances.

So we're probably more
on the warp drive level

where we want to go.

But even the warp drive,
it won't help that much.

A good example is Voyager.

You have the Captain Janeway.

And they got caught in a
wormhole and got spit out I

think it was over in the
Alpha quadrant of our galaxy.

And she's told her crew
9.3 warp, running 24/7,

it's going to take us
75 years to get home.

That's a little upsetting.

However-- and that's
in warp drive.

Once again, warp drive is not
that good for linear distance.

Einstein put a challenge
out on us one time.

He asked everybody, he said,
how can you go millions of times

faster than the speed
of light and not

break the speed of light?

How are you going to do that?

Figured out a way to do it.

I'll give you an example here.

What you have here
is Milky Way galaxy.

What you have over
here is Andromeda.

Now to get across this
page on a straight line

at speed of light, which is
186,756 miles per second,

it would take you 200
million years at that speed

to get across this page.

Well that's just not
going to be acceptable,

because life forms--

you know 80 years for
us, maybe a couple

hundred for others, but
not no 200 million years.

So you got to cut that down.

In my drive, I'm not
really moving that much

on a linear plane
as I am becoming

an artificial black hole.

And you pull the fabric
of time around yourself,

jump through it's
dimensional barriers,

shut it off, come on the other
side of it, and there you are.

And you get around
pretty good that way.

I'm pretty sure a lot
of the life forms,

they're using some kind of
form like that, of drive.

>> David Adair has not only
worked on advanced propulsion

systems, but has also witnessed
advanced technologies housed

at the highly classified
military base commonly referred

to as Area 51.

Could the technology
he observed have been

extraterrestrial in origin?

>> This giant thing
sitting up there?

No weld lines.

No seams.

No nuts.

No bolts.

No screws.

It looked like it just
grew into this machine.

Now how did you do that?

That wasn't us.

And this thing was exoskeleton.

It looked organic, but
it's an inorganic machine

that has all the characteristics
of organic organism.

You know how you pull
an engine out of a car,

set it on the ground?

There is the car over
there, here's the engine.

Same thing.

So this power plant, by
proportional size of it,

I could estimate the size
of the craft it came out of.

It came out of something the
size of an aircraft carrier.

This thing was powerful.

This thing had the power
of the sun on steroids.

Inside the magnetic fields, the
magnetic walls in this thing,

it looked like--

first how it's shaped.

Its skeleton was on the outside.

And I mean the skeleton.

They looked like
vertebrates, and shinbones,

and stuff like that.

You had two round spheres.

It looked like two
octopuses having sex.

All the tentacles was
the piping of the plasma

drives of the shields.

It's in a figure
eight formation.

And this thing
probably at idle, it'd

be 100 million degrees
centigrade at idle.

That 10,000 times
hotter than our sun.

It could be a heat transfer.

Like you have electromechanical
into electric into electric.

It could be sheer propulsion,
equal and opposite reaction.

If you put a plasma
being down the cord

line of this thing, the center
of it, and open up an orifice,

you would have a
spew of material

going out of there that
would be endless, eternity.

What I learned is, first
thing, you're not alone.

Very first thing, there is
somebody else out there.

And it's not that
I heard voices.

It's impressions, feelings.

These beings are old.

They're born between
the galaxies.

Where we thought it was just
dark matter, deep space,

nothing, they said, no, there's
entire solar systems out there.

Just recently Hubble
has found solar systems

between the galaxies.

We didn't know that.

>> While there is no consensus
among scientists about

the physics required for these
technologies or whether they

are of human or extraterrestrial
origin, astrophysicist Dr.

Eric Davis wrote the following.

>> I was a DOD deputized advisor
to the "Nimitz" and "Roosevelt"

investigator under a
subcontract to the DOD.

And I perfectly know the
provenance of these videos

plus all the associated ages
weapon systems and other radar

as well as all
the pilot reports.

These are the
facts and are true.

Those craft are off-world.

That is not my opinion but is
where the physics and the facts

lead.

>> So these things
are born out there.

And they're not
thousands of years old.

They're not millions.

They're like 12
billion years old.

They're some of the oldest
living things in the universe.

They're cognitive memory
can remember Big Bang.

That's back there, you all.

>> The concept of an advanced
conscious machine is not unique

to David Adair.

Dr. Jack Sarfatti
believes this may also

be characteristic of the
infamous Tic Tac UAP.

>> The machine itself
is a conscious entity.

So the hull, the
fuselage of Tic Tac

is a special kind of
metamaterial which also, it

turns out, is a
conscious computer.

It's a conscious
artificial intelligence,

artificial neural network.

The metamaterial is
kind of like the brain,

like neurons in the
brain, the metamaterial.

So the metamaterial,
it can generate

a strong gravitational field.

And it also generates
consciousness.

It's the conscious computer
that talked to me when I was

13 years old on the telephone.

I was contacted by a Tic
Tac when I was a kid.

I didn't call it a Tic Tac.

Now I know it was a Tic Tac.

>> It was a cold,
metallic voice.

Sounded like Stephen
Hawking's voice.

And it said it was a
computer aboard a spacecraft

from the future, and that I was
part of a group of young kids

that they were contacting.

And was I willing to
be part of the project?

And I said, yes, although I was
scared, but I'm compressing it.

But the point is
that they said that I

would begin to meet others in
20 years in the future, which

is when I met Hal Puthoff.

>> I'm Hall Puthoff.

I'm a physicist.

And basically we do
forefront research

on energy and propulsion
for spaceflight.

>> In the whole SRI,
all these CIA guys,

remote viewing 20
years later, 1973.

This story is pretty well known.

It sounds like science fiction.

It's the God's honest truth.

It really was a
conscious computer

onboard a spacecraft, a Tic Tac,
from the future that came back.

>> 20 years after Dr.
Sarfatti's childhood encounter,

he was invited to Stanford
Research Institute where from

1972 until 1991, classified
research projects were carried

out on various phenomena
characterized by the term

"parapsychology."

This attracted the
sponsorship of such groups

as NASA and the Central
Intelligence Agency.

>> I go to SRI.

I meet all these
spooks from CIA.

I met Hal Puthoff, Russell Targ,
Edgar Mitchell, the astronaut,

other spooks, OK?

And I talk about what
happened in 1953.

And then they say,
well, yeah, we

think UFOs are coming
from the future.

What we're witnessing
is our technology

that Jack Sarfatti, me,
and his team in California,

the UK, France, and Italy
are going to develop

in the next few years.

And then we're going to
shoot it back in time

to 2004 and other time periods.

We're seeing the success of
our experiments, our theories,

because I was told as a child
that this was going to happen.

>> While Dr. Sarfatti believes
that these craft are us from

the future, could it be that
what we're witnessing is

actually reverse engineered
extraterrestrial technology?

>> In the photos that you have
of this UFO, your Tic Tac,

I believe that's
reverse engineered.

The reason why,
it's clumsy looking.

It's not all that
real sophisticated.

You got this little blunt
thing moving through the air.

And it's linear
moving, obviously.

So it's confined on a linear
basis, point A to point B.

It's probably using some
kind of action reaction.

Or, that thing could very well
be using a magnetic field,

because you see no exhaust
or intakes or anything on it.

So it could be doing that.

But I've just kind of feeling
it's reverse engineered,

because it's just doesn't
have the slickness

of an alien intellect on it.

It's human.

And we've probably cheated.

We've copied some little alien's
paper and jumped to that.

And when you copy
something, you're

not the original inventor.

There's stuff that you
don't know about it,

but you're just mimicking it.

We're not as sophisticated
as people think we are.

There may be certain
fractions of humans

that have access to
technology that would

be 24th, 25th century level.

And that's annoying
to think about

that somebody has
access to that and we're

over here with chemical
rockets and told to celebrate.

God.

But I don't know.

I think we got a lot of
reverse engineered stuff.

I saw something one time
and there were two of them.

They were crafts.

They looked like
flying arrowheads.

And it's the way I saw them
that made it really cool.

Just one out of
a billion chance,

I'm leaning against
the back of a pool.

And the sun went down
behind the building.

Now you're not blinded
by the yellow ball,

but you see the
corona perfectly.

Well flying into the corona,
as it came into the corona,

it solid up.

As it's passing
through the corona,

it's completely visible.

Looks like a flying arrowhead.

Goes out and when it goes
out, starts disappearing.

When it's out of the
corona, completely gone.

One second later, here
comes another one right

underneath it.

There's two of them.

And did the same thing.

I'm going, my god, the sun's
corona decloaked these things.

And the direction they were
going from where I was setting,

they were heading
straight for Area 51.

So, yeah, we got
stuff like that.

But I don't think we're
far along as everybody

thinks we are.

I think we give way too much
credit to these covert groups

when they're made up of
people just like you and me.

Their IQ can't be 500.

They just got access to
stuff we haven't seen.

Could you imagine you
turn over a Nissan Altima

and give it to a caveman?

How far are they going to
get along with that thing?

Not too far.

We're the same way.

We've got these vehicles.

We probably don't even know
what 5% of them work on it.

We do it trial by error,
which could be real dangerous,

get you killed doing that.

>> Dr. Paul LaViolette
also questions the origins

of the Tic Tac technology.

>> One possibility is that the
Tic Tac technology was reverse

engineered from an
extraterrestrial craft.

But I think more probable,
we developed it on our own.

Because, basically, if you
know about Townsend Brown's

electrogravitics, you
know about Tesla's work

with non-reversing pulses.

Tesla was working
with negative pulses,

which are anti-gravitic.

And he was observing
forces pushing with these.

Somebody's going to click
and say, OK, if we use this,

we can use this in terms
of space propulsion.

So with a little
experimentation and money

thrown into the project, they
would have developed this.

>> I believe it's very possible
that this technology is

extraterrestrial.

And how do I know that?

Because nobody can
prove that it's not.

There's literally not
a single physicist--

the very fact that we can't
even describe the physics,

our physics isn't
even accurate enough

to properly encode
what's being observed

and explain it should tell us
how far behind we are whoever

is making that technology.

Because everybody is still
on combustion-based vehicles

and machines, I see
no reason to believe

that it's human technology.

Whoever owns that technology
will become god on Earth.

And I see no such person.

>> I have no reason to
think there aren't aliens,

but I think the only advanced
intelligences that are

interested in humans on this
planet are our future selves

who want to come back, who will
have to come back in order that

everything that they don't
disrupt the timeline.

It's a self-creation process.

In quantum mechanics,
in quantum physics,

you have to have the
future influencing

the present in addition to the
past influencing the present.

That's what nonlocal quantum
entanglement is all about--

the future influencing
the present.

The machine itself is
a conscious entity.

>> The discovery of special
relativity by Einstein in 1905

and of quantum mechanics in
the 20th century by Einstein,

Planck, Bohr, Schrodinger, and
Heisenberg led to the creation

of the atomic hydrogen bomb,
as well as computer chips,

the world wide web, and Silicon
Valley's multibillion dollar

corporations.

The lesson is that breakthroughs
in fundamental physics,

both theoretical
and experimental,

have always led to
profound paradigm shifts.

>> Well I believe that free
energy and advanced space

propulsion technologies,
anti-gravity,

and so on will have a very
positive impact on humanity.

It will be disruptive
to the old technologies,

but it could be phased in.

>> Man, if you get any of these
propulsion units, anti-gravity,

warp drive, fusion containment,
you get any of these things

online, then you
got Star Trek, man.

You got star ships.

And vast distances
would not be a problem.

The very essence of
where you're at in life

will change if these
kind of technologies

roll up and out onto the
platform that we can use them.

And it will affect your life.

And I don't care who you are.

If you're just a ditch digger,
it's going to affect your life.

>> Well what are
the implications?

What were the
implications for humanity

when they discovered fire?

What were the
implications for humanity

when they discovered writing?

What were the
implications for humanity

when they discovered gunpowder?

What were the implications
for humanity when

they discovered electricity?

OK?

What were the implications
when they discovered computers?

Well this is like that.

This is next step.

This is the big thing.

We're talking about
surviving death.

We understand how human souls
are generated in matter.

We understand that
now in principle.

We understand it.

And we understand
how these things fly.

We understand how to
manipulate space and time.

We are the conquerors of time.

We are the conquerors
of space and time.

What does that mean?

It means the stars are ours.

We are going to be men like God.

The point is that
civilization itself

was created from the future.

I call this the destiny matrix.

There is nothing bigger.

There's nothing
bigger than this.

>> If this is the
future creating itself,

then could that future also
include us reverse engineering

extraterrestrial technology
to fly in ways conventional

aircraft cannot?

Or might that future
creating itself

allow for human
ingenuity to create

these remarkable machines?

And if so, why is this
technology being suppressed?

Either way, the
Tic Tac technology

is a smoking gun that demands
more scientific scrutiny.

In our next episode,
we examine the pyramid

shape UAPs that appeared over
the Kremlin and Pentagon.

Might this be a
message for humanity?