Original subtitles

>> Maximum warp.

Punch It!

>> Warp drive is one of the fundamental features of many

science fiction dramas today.

And the idea of somehow counteracting gravity in order

to travel to distant stars and planets in record time

is one of our greatest collective dreams.

Is warp speed travel actually feasible?

And if so, has it already been accomplished?

>> We're at runway 06 and still 2-5.

>> On December 16, 2017, two videos emerged on the internet

that showed Navy pilots encountering mysterious

spherical objects that move through the air in ways that

mystified experts.

>> My gosh, there's a whole fleet of them.

Look on the SA.

They're all going against the wind.

The wind's 120 knot to the west.

>> What the hell is that?

A moving target?

>> A third video, released in March 2018,

depicted a similar encounter.

>> Look at that thing.

It's rotating.

>> These three videos are referred to as Flir1, Gimbal,

and GoFast.

>> Oh my gosh, man.

Wow.

Look at it fly!

>> Years earlier, the videos captured by a US Navy FA-18

Super Hornet documents an incident that occurred in 2004

known as the "Nimitz" Encounters,

so named for the fighter pilots of "USS Nimitz"

Carrier Strike Group who spotted the mysterious flying bodies.

>> 2.5 dB.

>> The pilots reported a strange,

shaped object resembling the popular Tic Tac breath mint

about 100 miles off the coast of San Diego.

What makes these particular videos so significant

is the fact that in September 2019,

the official spokesperson for the Deputy

Chief of Naval Operations for Information Warfare

confirmed publicly--

>> The Navy designates the objects contained in these

videos as unidentified aerial phenomena.

>> While that statement alone is of historical significance,

what the videos themselves suggest is remarkable.

Ongoing incursions of unidentified aerial phenomena,

or UAPs, are being captured on video by the US Navy

that maneuver in ways that are impossible

for any current, acknowledged aviation technology.

Might this be a smoking gun for advanced exotic propulsion

systems or might these craft be evidence

of extraterrestrial technology from off planet?

>> When I'm looking at the Flir videos, for example,

that were released by the Navy, what I'm seeing is something

that has a couple of characteristics.

The one characteristic that stands out the most

is that it has no flight surfaces, right?

When you want something to fly in the air,

you need it to follow the laws of aerodynamics.

It needs to have wings.

It needs to generate lift.

It needs to be able to work against gravity.

So it needs to reduce its drag, and so on.

Now secondly, they also don't seem to leave any propulsion

signature.

So I'm not seeing any sort of exhaust coming out

of them like you would expect.

So it's literally defying the laws of physics

as we know them.

And it's outmaneuvering our pilots.

That is a very fascinating and incredibly mind-blowing.

>> Roger that.

>> Commander David Fravor was leading a training exercise

from the "USS Nimitz" Carrier Strike Group when the incident

occurred.

"The New York Times" reported in an interview with Fravor

that the objects appeared suddenly at 80,000 feet

and then hurtled toward the sea, stopping at 20,000 feet

and just remained hovering.

Then it either dropped out of radar range

or shot straight back up.

>> It accelerated like nothing I've ever seen.

I have no idea what I saw.

It had no plumes, wings, or rotors, and outran our F-18s.

>> When these craft clearly demonstrate unconventional

flight dynamics, there are a number of hypotheses as to how

they might be accomplishing this.

>> Even though the Tic Tac seems to be--

from an outside observer-- seems to be moving at, say,

20,000 miles an hour, it's not generating any friction.

Like when a rocket comes into the earth's atmosphere,

the reentry problem and it heats up.

That doesn't happen with Tic Tac.

See, that doesn't happen with the Tic Tac.

The way warp drive is it's like surfing on a wave.

The wave is the curvature of space, the rippling of space.

So the surfer is not really moving

relative to the water he's around,

he's moving with the water.

That's the way the Tic Tac moves.

But it's controlling the way the space is warping.

See, it's controlling its path.

And it does it with small amounts of energy.

So the hardest thing for people to understand

is that when you see a flying saucer or a Tic Tac,

it's not an ordinary vehicle that's moving through air.

It's controlling the gravitational field right

around its fuselage.

For example, if the Tic Tac wants to move to the east--

let's say, if it moves to the east--

what it does, it's able to contract the space in its nose

and expand the space in its tail.

It's folding space, sitting still in space really.

But to the outside observer, it looks as if it's moving.

>> Warp drive, as the name implies,

relies on warping space so that you're stretching space on one

end of your ship and expanding it by a lot on the other.

So you're zipping through space-time.

That's how I like to imagine it.

However, anti-gravity propulsion is different.

Anti-gravity is where you can create

your own gravitational field that essentially repels

or cancels the gravitational field that you're

being affected by.

>> Well with anti-gravity, the big advantage that thing would

have is when you encounter planets.

You can come and go off of its surface

without having to fight all the gravitational forces

of a planet, which would cause you

to build your ships with different propulsion systems.

If a warp drive system had an anti-gravity system, that

would be real handy because you use your warp drive to get

from place to place, switch over to the anti-gravity

when you get inside a gravity field of a planet,

and basically you will have removed all the energy that's

involved with magnetism, such as kinetic energy, momentum,

inertia, all that would evaporate.

>> In his scientific paper, "Is Low Power Warp Drive Possible,"

Dr. Jack Sarfatti posits the idea that quantum metamaterials

may be used to produce low power warp while staying true

to Einstein's general and special theories of relativity.

Dr. Sarfatti believes he's discovered a workable way

to fold space-time.

>> Warp drive is just a very elementary application

of Einstein's general theory of relativity of the gravitational

field.

And Einstein's field equations basically

show how you can use an applied electromagnetic field,

like a source, a pump.

And from that electromagnetic field,

you can generate a gravitational field.

The problem has been that the coupling

between the electromagnetic input

field and the induced gravitational output field

is very weak.

I found a way to make it very strong.

That's simply it, using what are called metamaterials.

Metamaterials are artificially made.

They're made by man.

They don't exist naturally in nature.

They're just like lattices of artificial atoms.

We make these artificial atoms.

They're called meta-atoms.

There are various ways of making them.

I won't go into detail.

And we just construct them like they're like a neural network,

just like lattices, like crystals.

And these artificial atoms are at definite positions

of the crystals.

And they have extraordinary electromagnetic properties.

When we impose electricity--

so in magnetic fields, in the metamaterials,

they could go into what are called certain resonance

states.

And they can generate strong gravitational fields.

So the metamaterials is a way of generating,

inside the metamaterial, a strong gravity

field from a very weak electromagnetic field.

>> I think metamaterials are very important to faster than

light UAPs, or just the idea of UAPs for two reasons.

First of all, there was the bismuth magnesium part

that was theorized to be a metamaterial.

That really got people thinking that, OK, maybe metamaterials

are an important part of UAPs.

So that's one line of thought.

The second line of thought, though,

of why they would be important, however,

is just intrinsically for their value, right?

There's no way you can really build advanced technology

that's manipulating electric fields and, let's say,

coupling with the gravitational field in some anomalous way

without at least being able to intelligently manipulate

and control electromagnetic waves,

so through vis-a-vis metamaterials.

>> There's a whole bunch of optical metamaterials.

But for a space propulsion, they tend

to work at the microwave frequencies.

And they were developing microwave metamaterial.

Like the Boeing cube, for example, developed by Boeing.

Interested Boeing was involved in this classified work.

So why are they working metamaterials?

Well, this is a connection.

It's possible, like they talk about the arts

parts, the skin of the craft that crashed in Roswell,

that it's layered material.

And that could act as a metamaterial.

Theoretically, if you took a 5,000 terahertz beam, which

would probably in the far infrared and aimed it at it,

you should get propulsion.

You should be able to move it.

So that's a form of metamaterial.

It's basically layers of magnesium and bismuth

that are spaced just right to interact with this beam.

>> While the significance of metamaterials is being explored

by scientists from different perspectives, Dr.

Jack Sarfatti believes he understands how to apply them

to the UAP discussion.

>> I've discovered, along with other physicists,

mainly Keith Wanser, full professor of Physics,

Cal State Fullerton, we think we know, in principle,

how to increase the coupling between electromagnetism

and gravity in order to control the gravity field with

electromagnetism using small amounts of energy.

The trick is in metamaterials we can

make the effective speed of light very tiny.

And by doing that, we increase the coupling

between electricity and magnetism

and the gravitational field it creates.

So that's the trick.

We're playing with the electromagnetic properties

of metamaterial to amplify the effect of the input

electromagnetic field on the gravitational field it creates.

>> They're all going against the wind.

The wind's 120 knots to the west

>> We can then, with theoretical physics,

can take a Tic Tac doing a certain maneuver.

And then from that, we can calculate

what kind of gravitational field is required to do that.

>> Look at that thing!

>> It's rotating.

>> And then how much energy do we have available?

And then we could design a material that will do it.

You know, it's a complicated thing,

but with teams of scientists we can do it.

>> That raises the question, how fundamental are metamaterials

to understanding how UAPs maneuver?

>> It explains how those things work.

It's pretty elementary, actually.

But once you have the right idea,

everything falls in place.

There's no mystery.

I am saying there's no mystery as to how this technology

fundamentally works.

There's no mystery.

It's just, now, a matter of engineering development

of the right kinds of materials that we

could use to amplify the effect of electromagnetism

in creating a gravitational field.

That explains the close encounters

of the "USS Nimitz," the "Roosevelt,"

and, apparently, many other close

encounters that are still classified.

>> And yet not everyone agrees.

Scientists find no theoretical consensus

as to how this technology functions.

>> When it comes to describing how the physics

of the unidentified craft that the "USS Nimitz"

encountered in 2004 and, in general,

the UAPs that the Navy have been reporting.

I think that there is a couple of good guesses

that I could present as to how I think it's done.

And only time and empirical scientific evidence

will truly tell us how it's done.

But that being said, what I believe is happening

is an extremely controlled interaction

at the quantum level between gravitons

and the rest of the ship in such a way

that they can somehow control that entire interaction better

than we can.

It has yet to be proven that gravitons does exist.

I'm assuming they do in this scenario.

So they're managing this interface with space-time.

And that allows them to be able to do multiple 1,000 G

maneuvers.

Whereas the average F-18 would crush

under just 8-10 Gs of forces.

If the G-forces aren't being felt and experienced

on the actual ship and that they are only

measured and experienced relative

to our frame of reference, in that scenario,

the way that they would be surviving

is what I guess would be anti-gravity method one.

So that would be just canceling the entire gravitational field

that they're experiencing.

So for them, it doesn't matter how quickly they accelerate

left, right, up, or down, they're calm

and still inside their ship.

That's what it would look like.

I think that we can passively describe

what we're observing with current classical physics

and just even today's quantum physics,

but to truly explain the physics behind what we're seeing,

we're going to have to find new physics.

>> So I would prefer thinking in terms of superluminal

propulsion.

And I'd deal more with the ether rather than warping space-time.

The idea of warp drive is based on more

of the conventional view of space-time being warped somehow

and creating a gravity gradient by warping space-time.

That's based in the general relativity paradigm, which

I don't ascribe to because I believe it's a failed paradigm

since it doesn't predict electrogravitics, for example.

And there are other replacements for it.

Superluminal propulsion is using propulsion

to go faster than the speed of light.

Well there's various technologies

you could do to achieve this.

One is, for example, Podkletnov's gravity impulse

beam.

He's achieved speeds of the gravity waves

that his beam puts out into the thousands

times the speed of light.

So if you use that pushing on a spacecraft,

theoretically it could go thousands of times speed

of light.

Another is Townsend Brown's electric kinetic thrusters.

Those are less power hungry, but the question

is would they be able to get you over the speed of light.

The other technology involves electogravitics, basically.

And with that, you could go superluminal

with a minimum amount of energy expenditure.

So I believe that's actually the most reasonable to use.

His diagram is from something I wrote up

in 1985 when I first discovered about electrogravitics.

Here you see a disk-like craft sort

of levitating in the midair.

And you see the pluses and minuses on its hull

represent electric charges.

And we're talking about very high voltages

here in the millions of volts.

Now this gets into electrogravitics,

how you can create gravitational potentials

using electric potentials.

This was discovered by Townsend Brown at the beginning

of the 20th century.

T. Townsend Brown, best known for the phenomena

called the Biefeld-Brown Effect and electrogravitics,

was an American inventor whose pioneering research

anti-gravity and electric fields paved

the way for many other scientists and researchers that

followed him.

>> In the physics I've been developing called subquantum

kinetics, the important thing that comes out of this--

that you don't see it anywhere else,

not conventional physics or any other theory--

is that negative charges are anti-gravitic.

Very important to know because with that just that concept,

you can create all sorts of engineering

and space propulsion.

Positive charges create gravity wells.

So when you charge the capacitor,

you're creating a gravity hill on the negative side

and a gravity well on the positive side.

And you create, therefore, a gravity gradient

through the capacitor that propels it

in the direction of the gravity well.

>> We seem to be so fixed on action and reaction drives,

Newtonian physics, and linear distances.

So we're probably more on the warp drive level

where we want to go.

But even the warp drive, it won't help that much.

A good example is Voyager.

You have the Captain Janeway.

And they got caught in a wormhole and got spit out I

think it was over in the Alpha quadrant of our galaxy.

And she's told her crew 9.3 warp, running 24/7,

it's going to take us 75 years to get home.

That's a little upsetting.

However-- and that's in warp drive.

Once again, warp drive is not that good for linear distance.

Einstein put a challenge out on us one time.

He asked everybody, he said, how can you go millions of times

faster than the speed of light and not

break the speed of light?

How are you going to do that?

Figured out a way to do it.

I'll give you an example here.

What you have here is Milky Way galaxy.

What you have over here is Andromeda.

Now to get across this page on a straight line

at speed of light, which is 186,756 miles per second,

it would take you 200 million years at that speed

to get across this page.

Well that's just not going to be acceptable,

because life forms--

you know 80 years for us, maybe a couple

hundred for others, but not no 200 million years.

So you got to cut that down.

In my drive, I'm not really moving that much

on a linear plane as I am becoming

an artificial black hole.

And you pull the fabric of time around yourself,

jump through it's dimensional barriers,

shut it off, come on the other side of it, and there you are.

And you get around pretty good that way.

I'm pretty sure a lot of the life forms,

they're using some kind of form like that, of drive.

>> David Adair has not only worked on advanced propulsion

systems, but has also witnessed advanced technologies housed

at the highly classified military base commonly referred

to as Area 51.

Could the technology he observed have been

extraterrestrial in origin?

>> This giant thing sitting up there?

No weld lines.

No seams.

No nuts.

No bolts.

No screws.

It looked like it just grew into this machine.

Now how did you do that?

That wasn't us.

And this thing was exoskeleton.

It looked organic, but it's an inorganic machine

that has all the characteristics of organic organism.

You know how you pull an engine out of a car,

set it on the ground?

There is the car over there, here's the engine.

Same thing.

So this power plant, by proportional size of it,

I could estimate the size of the craft it came out of.

It came out of something the size of an aircraft carrier.

This thing was powerful.

This thing had the power of the sun on steroids.

Inside the magnetic fields, the magnetic walls in this thing,

it looked like--

first how it's shaped.

Its skeleton was on the outside.

And I mean the skeleton.

They looked like vertebrates, and shinbones,

and stuff like that.

You had two round spheres.

It looked like two octopuses having sex.

All the tentacles was the piping of the plasma

drives of the shields.

It's in a figure eight formation.

And this thing probably at idle, it'd

be 100 million degrees centigrade at idle.

That 10,000 times hotter than our sun.

It could be a heat transfer.

Like you have electromechanical into electric into electric.

It could be sheer propulsion, equal and opposite reaction.

If you put a plasma being down the cord

line of this thing, the center of it, and open up an orifice,

you would have a spew of material

going out of there that would be endless, eternity.

What I learned is, first thing, you're not alone.

Very first thing, there is somebody else out there.

And it's not that I heard voices.

It's impressions, feelings.

These beings are old.

They're born between the galaxies.

Where we thought it was just dark matter, deep space,

nothing, they said, no, there's entire solar systems out there.

Just recently Hubble has found solar systems

between the galaxies.

We didn't know that.

>> While there is no consensus among scientists about

the physics required for these technologies or whether they

are of human or extraterrestrial origin, astrophysicist Dr.

Eric Davis wrote the following.

>> I was a DOD deputized advisor to the "Nimitz" and "Roosevelt"

investigator under a subcontract to the DOD.

And I perfectly know the provenance of these videos

plus all the associated ages weapon systems and other radar

as well as all the pilot reports.

These are the facts and are true.

Those craft are off-world.

That is not my opinion but is where the physics and the facts

lead.

>> So these things are born out there.

And they're not thousands of years old.

They're not millions.

They're like 12 billion years old.

They're some of the oldest living things in the universe.

They're cognitive memory can remember Big Bang.

That's back there, you all.

>> The concept of an advanced conscious machine is not unique

to David Adair.

Dr. Jack Sarfatti believes this may also

be characteristic of the infamous Tic Tac UAP.

>> The machine itself is a conscious entity.

So the hull, the fuselage of Tic Tac

is a special kind of metamaterial which also, it

turns out, is a conscious computer.

It's a conscious artificial intelligence,

artificial neural network.

The metamaterial is kind of like the brain,

like neurons in the brain, the metamaterial.

So the metamaterial, it can generate

a strong gravitational field.

And it also generates consciousness.

It's the conscious computer that talked to me when I was

13 years old on the telephone.

I was contacted by a Tic Tac when I was a kid.

I didn't call it a Tic Tac.

Now I know it was a Tic Tac.

>> It was a cold, metallic voice.

Sounded like Stephen Hawking's voice.

And it said it was a computer aboard a spacecraft

from the future, and that I was part of a group of young kids

that they were contacting.

And was I willing to be part of the project?

And I said, yes, although I was scared, but I'm compressing it.

But the point is that they said that I

would begin to meet others in 20 years in the future, which

is when I met Hal Puthoff.

>> I'm Hall Puthoff.

I'm a physicist.

And basically we do forefront research

on energy and propulsion for spaceflight.

>> In the whole SRI, all these CIA guys,

remote viewing 20 years later, 1973.

This story is pretty well known.

It sounds like science fiction.

It's the God's honest truth.

It really was a conscious computer

onboard a spacecraft, a Tic Tac, from the future that came back.

>> 20 years after Dr. Sarfatti's childhood encounter,

he was invited to Stanford Research Institute where from

1972 until 1991, classified research projects were carried

out on various phenomena characterized by the term

"parapsychology."

This attracted the sponsorship of such groups

as NASA and the Central Intelligence Agency.

>> I go to SRI.

I meet all these spooks from CIA.

I met Hal Puthoff, Russell Targ, Edgar Mitchell, the astronaut,

other spooks, OK?

And I talk about what happened in 1953.

And then they say, well, yeah, we

think UFOs are coming from the future.

What we're witnessing is our technology

that Jack Sarfatti, me, and his team in California,

the UK, France, and Italy are going to develop

in the next few years.

And then we're going to shoot it back in time

to 2004 and other time periods.

We're seeing the success of our experiments, our theories,

because I was told as a child that this was going to happen.

>> While Dr. Sarfatti believes that these craft are us from

the future, could it be that what we're witnessing is

actually reverse engineered extraterrestrial technology?

>> In the photos that you have of this UFO, your Tic Tac,

I believe that's reverse engineered.

The reason why, it's clumsy looking.

It's not all that real sophisticated.

You got this little blunt thing moving through the air.

And it's linear moving, obviously.

So it's confined on a linear basis, point A to point B.

It's probably using some kind of action reaction.

Or, that thing could very well be using a magnetic field,

because you see no exhaust or intakes or anything on it.

So it could be doing that.

But I've just kind of feeling it's reverse engineered,

because it's just doesn't have the slickness

of an alien intellect on it.

It's human.

And we've probably cheated.

We've copied some little alien's paper and jumped to that.

And when you copy something, you're

not the original inventor.

There's stuff that you don't know about it,

but you're just mimicking it.

We're not as sophisticated as people think we are.

There may be certain fractions of humans

that have access to technology that would

be 24th, 25th century level.

And that's annoying to think about

that somebody has access to that and we're

over here with chemical rockets and told to celebrate.

God.

But I don't know.

I think we got a lot of reverse engineered stuff.

I saw something one time and there were two of them.

They were crafts.

They looked like flying arrowheads.

And it's the way I saw them that made it really cool.

Just one out of a billion chance,

I'm leaning against the back of a pool.

And the sun went down behind the building.

Now you're not blinded by the yellow ball,

but you see the corona perfectly.

Well flying into the corona, as it came into the corona,

it solid up.

As it's passing through the corona,

it's completely visible.

Looks like a flying arrowhead.

Goes out and when it goes out, starts disappearing.

When it's out of the corona, completely gone.

One second later, here comes another one right

underneath it.

There's two of them.

And did the same thing.

I'm going, my god, the sun's corona decloaked these things.

And the direction they were going from where I was setting,

they were heading straight for Area 51.

So, yeah, we got stuff like that.

But I don't think we're far along as everybody

thinks we are.

I think we give way too much credit to these covert groups

when they're made up of people just like you and me.

Their IQ can't be 500.

They just got access to stuff we haven't seen.

Could you imagine you turn over a Nissan Altima

and give it to a caveman?

How far are they going to get along with that thing?

Not too far.

We're the same way.

We've got these vehicles.

We probably don't even know what 5% of them work on it.

We do it trial by error, which could be real dangerous,

get you killed doing that.

>> Dr. Paul LaViolette also questions the origins

of the Tic Tac technology.

>> One possibility is that the Tic Tac technology was reverse

engineered from an extraterrestrial craft.

But I think more probable, we developed it on our own.

Because, basically, if you know about Townsend Brown's

electrogravitics, you know about Tesla's work

with non-reversing pulses.

Tesla was working with negative pulses,

which are anti-gravitic.

And he was observing forces pushing with these.

Somebody's going to click and say, OK, if we use this,

we can use this in terms of space propulsion.

So with a little experimentation and money

thrown into the project, they would have developed this.

>> I believe it's very possible that this technology is

extraterrestrial.

And how do I know that?

Because nobody can prove that it's not.

There's literally not a single physicist--

the very fact that we can't even describe the physics,

our physics isn't even accurate enough

to properly encode what's being observed

and explain it should tell us how far behind we are whoever

is making that technology.

Because everybody is still on combustion-based vehicles

and machines, I see no reason to believe

that it's human technology.

Whoever owns that technology will become god on Earth.

And I see no such person.

>> I have no reason to think there aren't aliens,

but I think the only advanced intelligences that are

interested in humans on this planet are our future selves

who want to come back, who will have to come back in order that

everything that they don't disrupt the timeline.

It's a self-creation process.

In quantum mechanics, in quantum physics,

you have to have the future influencing

the present in addition to the past influencing the present.

That's what nonlocal quantum entanglement is all about--

the future influencing the present.

The machine itself is a conscious entity.

>> The discovery of special relativity by Einstein in 1905

and of quantum mechanics in the 20th century by Einstein,

Planck, Bohr, Schrodinger, and Heisenberg led to the creation

of the atomic hydrogen bomb, as well as computer chips,

the world wide web, and Silicon Valley's multibillion dollar

corporations.

The lesson is that breakthroughs in fundamental physics,

both theoretical and experimental,

have always led to profound paradigm shifts.

>> Well I believe that free energy and advanced space

propulsion technologies, anti-gravity,

and so on will have a very positive impact on humanity.

It will be disruptive to the old technologies,

but it could be phased in.

>> Man, if you get any of these propulsion units, anti-gravity,

warp drive, fusion containment, you get any of these things

online, then you got Star Trek, man.

You got star ships.

And vast distances would not be a problem.

The very essence of where you're at in life

will change if these kind of technologies

roll up and out onto the platform that we can use them.

And it will affect your life.

And I don't care who you are.

If you're just a ditch digger, it's going to affect your life.

>> Well what are the implications?

What were the implications for humanity

when they discovered fire?

What were the implications for humanity

when they discovered writing?

What were the implications for humanity

when they discovered gunpowder?

What were the implications for humanity when

they discovered electricity?

OK?

What were the implications when they discovered computers?

Well this is like that.

This is next step.

This is the big thing.

We're talking about surviving death.

We understand how human souls are generated in matter.

We understand that now in principle.

We understand it.

And we understand how these things fly.

We understand how to manipulate space and time.

We are the conquerors of time.

We are the conquerors of space and time.

What does that mean?

It means the stars are ours.

We are going to be men like God.

The point is that civilization itself

was created from the future.

I call this the destiny matrix.

There is nothing bigger.

There's nothing bigger than this.

>> If this is the future creating itself,

then could that future also include us reverse engineering

extraterrestrial technology to fly in ways conventional

aircraft cannot?

Or might that future creating itself

allow for human ingenuity to create

these remarkable machines?

And if so, why is this technology being suppressed?

Either way, the Tic Tac technology

is a smoking gun that demands more scientific scrutiny.

In our next episode, we examine the pyramid

shape UAPs that appeared over the Kremlin and Pentagon.

Might this be a message for humanity?