All language subtitles for Our daily poison ENG

1964 - The bread and wine of the year 2000

Nicols Well, you have no appetite?

No, no, as you want
one has appetite

I just read that just
introduce another product chemist

You can be the bread monoastearato

and for what?

to prevent it from hardening

as if that was not enough
wine dye

insecticide cover apple

meat that comes from animals

fattened with antibiotics

salad ingredients with chemicals

but this is too much!

The list of chemicals
that is added

in the power supply increases every day

but is it really
we believe about

You know the issue is quite
serious because all our future

the power supply
of the year 2000

is sufficiently important to
the future of the species

for us to do an investigation
is necessary

to all those concerned Number of
toxicologist of power supply

to clarify on
this issue

I tena four years when these
were passed imagnes

and pruning have been one of those
children sitting at table

Half a century after the research have resumed
stopped

and rightly so because
at that time

was too early to measure the
long-term effects of chemicals

used in the
food chain

from the fields to the producer
Consumer plate

However, these
ESTN everywhere

However these everywhere ESTN

about fruits and vegetables under the
form of pesticide residues

in epicera and ready meals

in the form of food additives

or an on packaging and
plastic containers

As they have regulated them?

have been testing them seriously?

There is a relationship between these
chemicals

To answer these questions
I've been around the world

patiently Uniting
puzzle pieces

because knowledge
is power

The National Audiovisual
y Arte France Present

OUR DAILY
POISON

A film by
Marie-Monique Robin

I am very happy to receive
this exploitation

as you see it is a
cereal exploitation

no live
tock,

here by the early 90
bean intensive agriculture

I make enough
in chemistry

and it is also here that had an accident in April
2004

just checking
cleaning bucket

on a sprayer with it
had just weeding maz

inhaled vapor
adjuvant

in a solvent
is called

monochlorobenzene
was in this code

"On the mazy
soybeans

Lasso or any
derivative

You can control
weeds

Monsanto's herbicide
Lasso "

After the
ccident

was taken to the
emergency room

couple some weeks,
but above

pair a few weeks, but above

health problems are

whose few months
after which led me

hospitalizacin 5 months and 9
month work stoppage, as is

give me da story today,
if you they are here

is because there are several people
victims of this product

is that it is a topic that is tab
very difficult to talk about it

"My solution: well used herbicides

except
weeds "

This fu a first world
in January 2010

thirty
sick

invited farmers met by the Movement for Respect
Law and Future Generations

one environmental organization
leading a campaign

about the dangers
of pesticides

At the beginning of my
career here is symbolic

because the beginning
of my career

one tore and
now the da

replant hedgerows have here
we have a little advance

this side I was ah double
title, first as a journalist

because the food chain starts
in the fields of farmers but also because

crec on a farm
located a hundred kilometers

as all these men
and women

my parents were actors of
the Green Revolution

that deeply transform the
agrcolas activities

the years following the
Second World War

The vein pattern of the
United States who thanks to

Marshall Plan that it was supposed to help aa
rebuild a Europe ruined

massively exported machines
and pesticides agrcolas

and all believed in them, they finished
scarcity and hunger

and industrial agriculture
may feed the world

"These last few years
the man managed to

this wealth has
given us

the best conditions of life that
the world has known jams"

In this model agrcola
chemistry has the answer for everything

it provides insecticides
to kill insects

herbicides to
destroy weeds

Because we gather
today we give?

Because we gather today gives?

15 years ago we work
in the chemical contamination

especially in the pollution
pesticides linked

Franois Veillerette Respect Movement
and the Right to Future Generations

and 15 years ago is seen by all
sides in the fields of France

Farmers tell us
that sick ESTN

sick or having companions

and give answers to the
questions that make us

either terms of doctors
or legal TOXICOLOGI CAL

because we have talented
experts that podrn

give them answers
my story, my case

fu might not be
more tenacious

but I was lucky to
survive that da

can be a bad day for signature
that sold me the product

neurolgico had a
problem, ie

headache, I know
very perda the

here have brutally coma that lasted
not much but it was deeper

and sudden today I daa
neurolgico treatment level

I'm going to Rennes every six
months because lesions appeared

in the brain and there is a very
close monitoring of evolution

"Do not Forget jams
PESTICIDES ARE POISONS

it is you who
should be careful

use pesticides with
precaution "

1960 - "Pesticide risks to health"
U.S. Department of Health

Pesticides are poison, I have here
there the merit of clarity

and
high doses can cause what they call

acute poisoning in english
"poisoning" a poisoning hazard

these jams have
been denied

by the promoters
of agriculture

chemistry that makes
50 years ago

did not hesitate to
shoot avctimas

acute intoxication
with the goal

of therapeutics research
and prevention

1970 - Advertising
Dupont

According to the World
Health Organization

each year from 1 to
3 million people

are victims of acute
poisoning by pesticides

and more than 200,000
die from this

with an annual consumption
of 80,000 tons

with an annual consumption
80,000 tons

since 1997 the Mutual Social Agrcola MSA

wearing a monitoring program

of acute poisoning

dubbed "phyto attitude"

Fito and Phytosanitary product
the term used

Power by the public and industry
to designate pesticides

in the year 2009 received the mutual
271 cases of acute poisoning

Dr. Jean Luc Dupupet - by doctor
Risk chemist, Social Mutual Agrcola

Know what kind of products
are incriminated?

are rather herbicides, fungicides?

Well we have an idea, we

when people have a headache

insecticides are usually

is declining because it is a category

a family of insecticides

tend to disappear

but with insecticides one has

the tendency to emphasize

you say h
adache

with fungicides more one observes
the cutneas manifestations

with herbicides is
digestive or cutneo

d to as diseases
professionals agrcola middle?

It is necessary, at the beginning of the years
90, 95 had American Studies

Italians and Scandinavians
who have highlighted that

Frequently habacnceres
in

agrcola population than in
the general population

agrcola Note that there are
fewer cases of cancer

in the middle that the
population in general

but that certain types of
cancer are more represented

and
all diseases have also been, I mean cancer

but also
talk about

especially diseases
neurolgicas PD

and that disease
seen in

certain people in certain
farmers recognized

as an occupational
disease since

an increased risk of this disease
linked to the utilization of the

"phy
o"

Products If the doctor
Dupupet response has been so laborious is because

to a recent date the
impact long term

pesti
ide

Long term pesticide

on the users was a subject tab

prevention messages
pointed ONLY

cases of acute poisoning but jams

the chronicle dbiles dose exposure to
and repeated in time

multiplication of
epidemiolgicos studies

has forced the mutual break
progressively silence

An example, Parkinson's disease

have established a relationship
between the chronicle exhibition

to pesticides and neurodegenerative
pathologies such

I escog two,
one fu

done by the National Institute of Health
and of Medical Research

in collaboration with
the physicians work

the MSA and the other by the
Parkinson Institute in California

Each study was performed
on a group of

at least
150 sick

compared to an
equivalent group

baptized not sick
as a "control group"

Caroline Tanner, Parkinson's
Institute Neuro epidemiologist

Our main result is you three
chemical substances

ESTN
strongly associated with the risk of disease

Parkinson's first
is the 2,4-D is a herbicide that

the second the other
herbicide Paraquat

and the third Permethrin
is an insecticide that

Alexis Elbaz, Neuroep
demiologista-INSERM

The insecticides
had watched that

a very particular relationship between
organochlorine insecticides

for which the risk
was a little ms

that high assembly with increased risk
by 2.5

The risk may be greater
than 2.5 to 3

There are times like DDT has been banned
long

or Lindane has been used
to the end of a 90s os

which has banned more
recently is Endosulfn

in most countries in any case
Western

for agricultural utilization
queue as the character

very persistent in
the environment

To this da
farmers thirty patients have been recognized as

professional
disease, of which

10 for disease
Parkinson

10 for Parkinson's disease

To the sick gathered
Ruffec this is not enough

that the MSA gives them the status of "dropper"

but the change in attitude of mutual
is a first in the world

Okay, now is the time
to give the word

people who have already been recognized

as occupational diseases

to show case already
took place, is your case?

I here what happened to
me, in the year 98

inhale the Gaucho (
Monsanto pesticide) gives a whole night

I was sick, the
doctor came

I vomited, he
made me a part

in which deca I had
inhaled the Gaucho

in the year 2002 I went to see a
neurologist in nuclear medicine

who I Tours said
you have the PD

and she told me frankly,
that can come

the pesticide
you inhal

I'm unemployed for
the last 7 years

I'm in Paris now gives
the past 18 months

Why? simply because
in Paris

Live incgnito, frankly I'm free
free

I will be in the field
and will make me as

I will point
the finger

I will not be able to
live in the countryside

Often the
victim where

is pointed the finger
for their own means?

Paul Franois,
Farmer

To my colleagues at the
beginning farmers decan

excuse me but you shut your
mouth because annoying

if you are more
sensitive than others

is your fault because
we have always used

we are not
sick

and now yields 6 years after not passing
I tell ten das

without me receiving
a phone call

people w
ether

ESTN sick or begin
to reason

otherwise have
reason for saying

we have a part of
responsibility

this pollution of the environment and the first victims will be
us

Forward,
orward

Yannick Chenet,
Farmer

I am Yanick they'm
farmer Saujon

,

Charente Maritime ca
ill in October 2002

I acquired acute
leukemia, Eloic type 4

then in 2003 made me
one graft surgery

medulla function of whether
either CHU Poitiers

of the surgery against me
that is to say the surgery

the person who gave
me the medulla is

and reacting against
my heart surgery

day gives the skin
problems have

and refraction of tendons
and skin escloredermine

dry eyes and many
other problems

dry eyes and
many other problems

Dr. Jean Luc Dudupet, Physicians
chemist in charge of Risk - MSA

They are only cnceres
that are recognized

diseases such as professional?

ESTN the blood cnceres

indeed those that were found

found more frequently

in studies epidemiolgicos

what is leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma

also is the
cancer of the

tambincncer
prstata skin

I
think about the pesticide manufacturers?

In France they are represented
by the Union of Industries

Protection of
Plant (UIPP)

which brings together 19
members, among which

6 ESTN industry giant
BASF Agro, Bayer, Down

Dupont, Monsanto
and Syngenta

Jean-Charles Bocquet;
Director UIPP

Jean-Charles Bocquet; Director UIPP

Today gives no evidence

that allows some correlation

accurate between the appearance
certain diseases

and exposure to product fitofarmacutico

A fifth believe?

MSA of a hand, giving the state

occupational disease

farmers with cancer

the other a representative of industry

which states that the relationship between pesticide

To see more clear I have contacted
the International Centre

for Research on Cancer
(IARC) that depends

WHO in 2007 entered the
CIRC to a report

which was published by the
Academy French

of Medicine
and Science

entitled The Causes
of Cncer in France

the snuff
designated the

as the leading
cause of disease

and stated that
only 0.5% of

cancer are due to the
chemical contamination

are due to the chemical contamination

At its board cnceres
attributable to exhibitions

the ignorant professional pesticide

and conclua: putative relationship

between pesticides and cancer

not based on data ningn slido

In the field of cancer

the CIRC is an international reference

is the fifth monograph sets

ie the classification of
the chemicals

in function of its potential cancergeno

paramount tool

the ruling of substances

their experts to examine this
the scientific literature

concerning the product to know
all published studies

that is what they call

the revision of the Reading Committee

Substances are classified
4-categories

Group 1: Cancergenos for Men

exceptional category because

there needs to be
epidemiolgicos data

so it is very
difficult to get

is the case of
asbestos or benzene

then comes the Group 2A:
Probable Cancergenos

for Men Group 2B: Possible Cancergenos
,

which characterize the substances of
which there are experimental data

in the more or less
important Animal

about 100,000 chemicals
marketed products

after the end of the
World War II

only 900 have been
evaluated by the CIRC

of which more
than half

is part of Group 3:
Unclassifiable

Vincent Cogliano, head of
Program IARC monographs

The fact that
a product

no chemist has been
classified by the CIRC

means that it is
not dangerous?

Not completely,
just means that

most cases have
not been tested

that means that
anyone considered

this data for
cancer or anyone

a studied cancergenos
potential effects

Really
I have not counted but I think we have

evaluated twenty or
thirty pesticides

in the history
of our program

But that's
nothing

It is true that it does not
look like much if you compare

In fact it is very
difficult for us

to make an evaluation
pesticide serious n

because most
experimental studies

concerning them
are not pblicas

certainly assume that
the signatures

which produce pesticides
must provide

their studies to the
National Health Agencies

because they do
tests and studies

are forwarded to the
Government Agencies

but are not
published

is very difficult
for us to access

As you explain the fact
that studies conducted by

of the Committee
Cientfica Reading?

Suddenly is not the
interest of firms

Maybe it is not the interest of firms

publish results that suggest

that their products can be harmful

anyway they are obligated not

make public their studies

Saba you that in 2007 the

French Academies
of Medicine and Science

have published a report with the CIRC

with the title "The Causes
the Cncer in France "?

Thanks

We currently are not cancergenos
in the animal or in man

I have consulted
their monographs

and I've found
at least

dichlorvos and
lorotalonile

if they have
been ranked

2B means that studies have
shown are cancergenos

at least in
animals

If you still are used
and I'm pretty sure

they are in animals
cancergenos

That means the
affirmation

in this report
is incorrect

Yes, I think
it is

1964 "The bread and
wine to or 2000 "

In theory should not
be insecticides jams

in the food
we eat

but it is not the case
today unfortunately da

quickly
but

How to know if during these
traces not favorecern

All good questions
and

have been made 50 years ago,
if pesticides are toxic

to the point of
illness to users

what about waste
one finds

in fruits and
vegetables treated?

Geneva, Sw
tzerland

To answer these questions
it is necessary

understand how it works
the ruling of the

chemicals the current
system has been developed

at the end of the years 1950
low conducted by WHO

FAO in collaboration with
the Organization of the

Looking in the archives, I discovered
a

toxic
ogo

Looking in the archives,
I have found that a toxiclogo

Capital francs a role pl
on site

tools designed
to regulate substances

entering qumicas
food contact

The name was Ren Truhaut,
the respondent had been

by my colleagues 50 years ago

1964 "The bread and wine of the year 2000"

Ren Truhaut

I can understand so that front

the pressure of the chemical
Aument of sb

in the last century when
our citizen of the world

and well in the food
domain specifically

has been given a
great importance

to microbiolgico
food control

and
has founded a number of all laboratories

to exercise supervision
and well be necessary

it is in the
morning

If control of agents
chemicals added to foods

because their effects
may be more insidious

less spectacular
if you want

but as I see
serious opinin

Ren Truhaut is
considered the father

of what
we call

Permissible Dose laborer or
acceptable with jargon DJA

first conceived for
Ruling food additives

this principal
toxicologist

then Extendi tool for
pesticide residues

here the definition that
gives Ren Truhaut:

"
Allowable Dose laborer is the number

food additive that can be
ingested daily throughout

a life without
no risk "

Interestingly
no one knows

really like the DJA
was invented

while she is
supposedly

to protect our health
of chemicals risk

The only person
that He found

is called Diane
Benford, toxicloga

of Britnica Food
Standards Agency

She is the author a
document entitled "Permissible Dose

one
laborer tool for ensuring food security

", where
fu

published by ILSI a body which
is funded by multinational

of the chemical and
the agroalimentacin

In his part histrica
Diane Benford

is content with naming
and Ren Truhaut

quote Paracelsus a Swiss physician
of the sixteenth century

regarded as the founder
of toxicologist

"Anything can be a
poison is the dose

makes the difference between
a poison and a remedy"

Diane Benford, Head of Risk Appraisal of
chemist, Food Standards Agency

The concept forms the
basis of the DJA

The concept which forms the basis of the DJA

is the principle of Paracelsus
"The dose makes the poison"

Is this true?

It is true

What does this mean exactly?

That means that the probability
have toxic effects

increases with dose
but fundamentally

is true for all
This includes water or oxygen

without which We could not live

if large absorvemos

quantities that can also be harmful

with the greatest amount of
As more elements

reduced the dose,
decreases the probability

have negative effects

It is what toxicologists call
the dose-effect relationship?

Correct

Not only the severity of
effect increases with dose

but also the number of individuals

having a negative REACTION

If I understand well, the whole
part evaluation process

the principle that all substances

qumicas are txicas

one tries to find a dose

involving not have any effect

It is correct

1958 - "Pesticide risks to health"

As seen here

a drop of
insecticide can be fatal

Specifically laborer Allowable Dose

is computed from
from studies

Laboratory Animals

First Step: You are given
a group of guinea pigs

high doses of chemicals

will generally oral

the goal is to determine
why one called

Lethal Dose or jargon LD50

ie the dose that kills
half of the animals

Second stage: the dose is decreased

to observe the effects on guinea pigs

for example is
whether products

daan tissues
or organs

if the cause effects on
the nervous system

or immune and Wanted
particularly interested us

at potential
cancergeno

because of course it is something
that concerns people

a dose that
apparently brings

any effect
on animals

is what we call
the NOAEL ie

Dose No Observed
Effect TOXIC

then to calculate
the DJA to serve

apply a safety factor by dividing the NOAEL
100

finally DJA is a
value expressed in

milligrams of product per
kilo of body weight

one DJA 0.2
mg / Kg

if the consumer weighing
60 kg is assumed that

can consume 60 times 0.2 mg / Kg
ie 12mg daily for da

lifet
me

without their health
being affected

You can say that
No-toxic dose

Observed Effect is a
safety threshold?

In life there
is no domain

wherein one can guarantee
absolute security

one runs the risk
of going off

the facts you may
have noticed

if the study was
of good quality

Ned Groth Expertise
in environment

is a confusing as it is
not extremely accurate

is why
the

persons managing used an uncertainty
factor, the standard form

applying a factor
of hundred

is what is considered
a factor 10

to consider
the difference it can

exist between animals
and humans

then a new
factor of 10

by the difference
in sensitivity

between humans
themselves

The question is whether it is sufficient to know
?

Numerous those
who argue that

this factor of
10 to account

This factor of 10 to account

of human variability
is too weak

by the same dose
can have an effect

zero for certain people

but others may be huge

Pr Erik Millistone, Professor of Policy How
Cientfica, University of Switzerland

The safety factor
is supposed to be one hundred

each is a figure of
heaven and scribbled

on a corner of the tablecloth

That was decided four
around a table

That's what Bob
Shipman had

one of the oldest in the Food
and Drug Administration

in a conference
that asist said:

"Fu in the years
1960, was

encontrramos need a way to
determine which level of output

pruned to
allow food

we met and ah is,
what Did "

While we wait,
the DJA is

While we wait, the DJA is

absolute reference value

for experts
to regulate

the chemicals that pollute

our food chain

As here in the European Authority EFSA

for Food Safety

Fontier Herman, Head of
EFSA Pesticide

Takes you to be a
DJA scientist the concept?

clear cientficas
research

there is a consensus in the scientific world that
was to fix the DJA

Pr Erik Millistone, Professor of
Scientific University deSuiza Policy How

There is a concept
cient fico

ris

but its acceptability acceptability
however the notion is a

essentially social, regulatory,
and commercial policy

essentially social, regulatory,
policy or commercial

acceptable, but acceptable to whom?

and behind the notion of acceptability

is always the question

Risk is acceptable pro
of course benefit?

but those who take benefits of
utilization of chemicals

companies are always
and not consumers

therefore consumers are
running the risk

1960 "Pesticide
risks to health"

The research allowed
to use these poisons

These men drink large
doses of pesticides

fruits, vegetables
and other foods

search for traces
of pesticide

Our foods are
tested for

average amount of pesticides
we ingest daily

For serving the DJA
if you do not

you consider the level
pesticide residues found

about fruits and
vegetables treated?

To do the experts have
invented a second

Limit Mximo of Waste
with jargon LMR

Fontier Herman, Head of
the EFSA Pesticide

What is the
MRL?

Well, that is
the number

can be found in a
food product

amount expressed in milligrams of
pesticides, pesticide residue

per kilogram of
foodstuff as well

FIXING
LMR n

is the result of a
fairly complex process

Pretty complex?
certainly

Consider a i
secticide

Take for example an insecticide

having a laborer Allowable Dose

0.01 milligrams per
kilo of body weight

the insecticide may be used on

twenty fruits and vegetables

As we know if we consumers

not reach sb gives the dose

considered insecticide
acceptable?

To do our persons managing
should evaluate

our potential exposure by measuring

the amount of residue left

on each product agrcola
after harvest

thanks to field testing
and then studies are needed

determining consumption
that fruits and vegetables

and how much we eat daily

given our
food consumption habits

Beaching of a country or
from one continent to another

The result, allowing thousands of figures
set the maximum limit

Quin sets this
figure?

A United Nations agency that responds to the barbarian
name

Elaboration of the
international Food

Rules the is advised by two committees
dependent WHO and FAO

the Joint Expert Committee
on Food Additives

called JECFA and the
Joint Committee on the

Gene
a

I have obtained the exceptional authorization
to attend the annual meeting of JMPR

comprised of international experts
whose mission is to analyze the

data
toxicolgicos pesticide

to set the DJA but
also to fix

the MRL for each
product agrcola

During the session
in September 2009

twenty pesticides have been
evaluated among which

chlorpyrifos-methyl
an insecticide manufactured

by the American firm Daw Agro Sciences

Bernadette Ossendorp,
Chairman of the FAO JMPR

Take for example the chlorpyrifos-methyl

which is used as an insecticide
worldwide

How can we tell if a consumer

has not reached a DJA

chlorpyrifos-methyl simply eating

3 blocks and two grapefruits for example?

If I understand your question

you should know that the
MRL level value

we evaluated
is much more elevated

that your actual exposure

according to our
monitoring program

we know that all
apples you eat

can not be treated
with chlorpyrifos-methyl

must understand that
Our evaluation of consumption

case corresponds to a theoretical "worst"

this has nothing to
do with the real world

in the real world you will have on your plate

a mixture of potatoes
that habrn been treated

carrots or lettuce also

that have not been treated

therefore the probability
you receive

a given high doses of
residues of this pesticide

is extremely low

Honestly, it is not
really that insurer

specifically this evaluation
categorical in the "worst"

is calculated based on data
sent by the industry

this occupies kilometers of shelves
in the subterranean WHO

for each pesticide manufacturer's packaging

thousands of pages concerciente

TOXICOLOGI CAL studying and
medicin of waste

during the field tests

Evil tongues say
is an industry strategy

to flood the experts
verify data difciles

It is impossible to know
how the experts work

because we have not
been authorized

to record the sound
of the debate

in effect on JMPR
everything is secret

the identity of the experts
,

content of sessions that
have a door closed

and the data submitted
by industry

which are covered by
the "trade secret"

Pr Angelo Moretto,
President of JMPR 2009

Pr Angelo Moretto, President of JMPR 2009

I have reviewed the list of
studies has sent

Dow Agro Sciences

the manufacturer of chlorpyrifos-methyl

is interesting because
all are "unpublished"

and covered by the
"Data protection"

you can check for yourself

Yes, it is quite possible, studies

providing industry JMPR

or national authorities
data are protected

a confidentiality clusula

but if you consult
the document occurred

by the JMPR and national authorities

Guests may find a summary
largest of these data

The summary data but not in "raw"

No, not the raw data for that

belongs to the manufacturers

you have to rely
in them by the analysis

and the interpretation
Correct Data

The practice of
keeping data secret

only serves the commercial interests
of the qumicas companies

it is not at all
in favor of

consumer interests and
health p Republic

WHO and Agencies
Ruling

not at all deserve the
confidence of the public

,
WHO Secretary for JMPR and JECFA

Because the data
is protected?

It is because of the right
of "intellectual property" are legal problems

,

data
are private and belong to the company that transmits

ustede must
therefore ask

to the industry
because as

Pr Erick Millestone, Professor of Policy How
Scientific University of Switzerland da

Only the data comprising the
manufacturing process

Product may
justify clusula

confidentiality, because it
represents information

but otherwise all
data TOXICOLOGI CAL

concerning security
or

Product toxicity duty
to be public domain

Angelika Trischer, WHO Secretariat
JMPR and JECFA

If one takes as an
example the snuff

with the studies provided by the
manufacturers, these were defective

provided by the manufacturer,
these were defective

and an engineered, forged

and WHO has been deceived by them during
many years by industry

I have a comment about this

But it is true than I comment

In addition this happened before my arrival

the organization, not
have all the details

It is a painful story here

If it's clearly a painful history

but the fact that
the "data protection"

has a huge discussion
here and see either

where we take
in the future

While waiting one
thing is sure

for industry
what is at stake is enormous

annual pesticide
market

represents 25
billion EUR

and 140
are sprayed tons each to or

each pesticide has
its DJA and LMR

For each category of
product agrcola

when you see all these
numbers, one that says

regulations all these
beautiful buildings

will be able to be reassuring
if the DJA and MRL

Scientists values ??were quite
safe to be definitive

but it is not the case, so we
the example of procymidone

a fungicide that has
been re examined

by JMPR Authority
to Order

Foundation
for the

Pr Angel Morello, President
of the JMPR 2009

The European Union has
expressed its concern

with respect to the
limits that habamos set

You Tenan Food Safety reason finally
EFSA has lowered the DJA of procymidone

here I document the EFSA
I quote "with the purpose to change

the MRL in order to
reduce exposure

consumer level
it is estimated there will be no

negative effects on your health "

When I've read this document from EFSA

I understand that the DJA or
the MRLs set by the EFSA

or JMPR were never definitive

If nothing in life is permanent

and this includes science

therefore, if there is new data
that require us to change

our previous decisions
then we do

Fontier Herman, Chief
EFSA Pesticide Unit

So I have a
EFSA document

If?

Published in January 2009
admit that change

DJA because the new data, right?

means that when the bean DJA

I thought that Protect
Protect me in fact not

Failure to Protect ... no tena

not offer the same protection ...

yet ... once again ... there is a
value of security applied

a value of 100 in relation
the no-effect dose

therefore no security ...

that ESTN ... a bit everywhere

inserted into the system ...
therefore it is unlikely

the DJA that had been
previously fixed

has affected the health

Bernadette Ossendorp,
Chairperson of the FAO JMPR

If you really want a
zero risk, has reason

no need to use pesticides

but it is a policy decision

while politicians
say they are authorized

because farmers need

to have bumper crops

it's the best we can do

"It's the best we can do"

summarizes this confession
well the first part

My research where
that waste comprend

of venom
found in food

are controlled by a system

of Ruling
arbitrary and approximate

1964 "The bread and wine of the year 2000"

Here we say that an
have one uncer-tainty

Light manufacturers take
all precautions

multiply the analysis

and experiences on animals

for manufacturers
Food Products

is an increased workload,
work expense

a waste of time are sure

all industrial
Foodstuff

undertake to make a research

The question is
inescapable effect

if the process
of Ruling

chemi
als

is based on studies
provided by industry

Escog the example
of food additives

emulsifiers, preservatives,
colorings or sweeteners

these chemical
substances

that have invaded
our power supply

with the birth of
the food industry

its potential
danger is known

for the last
50 years

Ren Truhaut
,

Toxiclogo a consumer
absorbs as

for two weeks for two months
during one year or two years

can not have
effects harmful

You can not have harmful effects

but you have to anticipate that these pequeas

repeated doses for long

every day over a lifetime

can sometimes take risks

extremely insidious

and sometimes an
risks with irreversible

as certain dyes, for example

that at least in the animals

already checked will
capable of causing

malignant proliferations ie cancer

Currently in Europe have been authorized

300 food additives
including aspartame

synthesis sweetener
that is found

at least 6000 products

current consumption and
soda

sugar-free products called

saccharine, chewing gums

but also drugs

the number of code E951

history of aspartame is exemplary

one finds all the techniques used

industry to manipulate

Ruling process

It all started in 1965,
when a researcher

of the pharmaceutical firm Searle discovered

fortuitously the molcula nine more years

later the company calls
one authorization for

put it on the market to
Food and Drug Administration

by the U.S. Agency for Safety

with the name
of Nutrasweet

with 50
milligrams DJA

David Hattan, FDA
Toxicologist

you think
aspartame safe to do?

If you
hink

When the FDA established
the DJA aspartame

Sear
e?

That's
ight

November
18 1996

Press Conference
on aspartame

Here is the heart
of the problem

studies provided
by Searle

to get aspartame
homologacin

was the subject of a great polmica
in years 1970

At the origin one
neurologist John Olney

that we see here in a
press conference

in 1996 ie 15 years
after the start

in t
e

aspartame market "Our
article published about

"Our article is published

on the increased incidence

of brain tumors in the population

human in the United States that began

Three years after the introduction

aspartame on the market "

That you had conducted studies

about aspartame?

Dr John Olney - Neuropsychiatrist
Washington University in St Louis

My first study of data
1971 which concerna

Aspartame is the combination
2 amino acids: aspartic acid

and fenil
lanida.

My study showed that
aspartic acid

destroys nerve
cells

as does
glutamate ped

after the signing
Searle

that sends me
a sample of

aspartame which they
did, this will feed d

babies mice and watched
the same brain damage

as with aspartic
acid or glutamate

But if aspartame is susceptible
of causing brain tumors

what is at stake in
health is huge!

Because the FDA
Auth aspartame?

Because the FDA did not
do their job properly

In fact the way
the FDA handled

to the dossier of
aspartame is at least

I could see troubling
internal files

of the agency through
the tenacity

Betty Martini who has
created a center

Betty Martini who has created a center

of documentation on aspartame

christened International Mission Possible

All the pieces accumulate conviction

obtained by
Freedom of Information Act

a U.S. procedure

that allows all citizens

accessing documents
of administration

As I discovered that alerted by John Olney

to assess the validity
of data provided by

Finally Searle
in August 1977

Dr. Bressler Jerom had
a severe drafted

The report denounced
irregularities all

in the studies
of signature

Here is an excerpt from
the reports made:

"The demands of observation
confirm that the animal number A23LM

was alive at
week 88

Dead Week 92
Week 104

Deaths of the week 92 to week 104

Live and dead week 108 week 112 "

then establishes a FDA
commission of investigation

pblica delivering his report

the September 30, 1980

The commission concluded that "the utilization

aspartame in food

should not be authorized
while the subject

its eventual potential cancergeno

has not been resolved by further studies "

November 3, 1987, Commission
Senate on aspartame

The irregularities

by FDA scientists were confirmed

during the 1987 Congressional hearings

Nutrasweet, Resource Committee
Senate Human

and notably by Jackqueline Verret

one agency toxicloga

Senator Howard Metzenbaum

and buds of American
consumers

Dr.Jaqueline Verret, FDA
toxicologist Thanks

sir Senator affirm without reservation
on the amount of aspartame

now we put all
the food

If we rely on these
studies is a mess

from my perspective they
do not have a minimum

trusted by procedural flaws in
his realization that returns

hardly inte
pretable

and prevent us from determining a figure
quite reliable fix a DJA

David Hattan, FDA
Toxicologist

"Eating can be hazardous
to your health"

le pray that there will be the main page
96 and I would like to have your comments

beca
se

you work here a long
time is not it?

She writes: "Not
that you choose by

the government
is corrupt

-Is good news
is not true -

but the sense of duty
is constantly corrodo

by contact with
industry

industry rather
than the effects

long term for
consumers, "

Share this
constatacin you?

No, I completely
disagree with it

I do not think
any of us

none FDA c
nsiders

do their job
properly

if not will put
consumer safety

above any co
sideracin

by the wellness industry
that equivaldraa

I am completely
disagree with it

However the auditions
Congress

in which I participated
David Hattan

one discovers the
surprising proximity

This head of the FDA
and the company

Searle which was run by
one of Donald Rumsfeld

1976 to 1980 the year of the election of Ronald Reagan
White House Senator Howard Metzenbaum

- Demo
rat

Between 1979 and 1982
four members of the FDA

having
participated to

Product homologacin been recrutados
by the aspartame industry

Pape, commissioner of the
FDA, Shuwan Gardner

Colby Howard, deputy
chief TOXICOLOGI CAL

FDA Michael Taylor
and FDA lawyer

before the commission
of research

No conflicts of
interest are really

but m s well
"revolving doors" fu

What the role of Donald
Rumsfeld in the process

of homologacin
of aspartame?

-Attorney James Turner, president of Citizens for
Health

Donald Rumsfeld dej
government when Gerald Ford

lost the presidency,
after being

of the pharmaceutical
firm Searle

The company was installed in the
represented circunscripcin

when elected to
Congress fu

the Searle family was
very influential

and all had sustained during
their political career

for which he was
recruited by Searle

After the election
of Ronald Reagan

After the election of Ronald Reagan

Rumsfeld uni transition team

the new president and who is the controlling

the nomination of the new
FDA commissioner

once installed, the
new commissioner dispos

Scientists working in the FDA

and declared that aspartame
tena no danger

Donald Rumsfeld

When I get a mission

I do the best I can

I have here as after
a few weeks

the election of Ronald Reagan

aspartame invaded the
American market

as soon as if by magic

the decision of the FDA copied fu

across the Atlantic

"NutraSweet because many things

taste very nice "

Geneva, Switzerland

Rencontr in WHO JECFA files

the Joint Committee for
Food Additives

All you discover that from 1975 to 1979

for aspartame while the
FDA

For example
1978 report notes that "reason

expressed doubts about the
validity of the data

Deferred application the committee
based its decision n "

Changing weather
report 1980

where the experts
decide to fix the DJA

aspartame
40 milligrams per kilo

In the annex of
the report adds

is the name
studies

which is based
this decision:

The DJA set by the
JECFA was adopted

with eyes
closed

by European countries and particularly by
the European Food Safety Authority EFSA

for the Safety
of Food

Huges Koenigswald, Head of Unit
Food Additive

This EFSA DJA 40 milligrams per kilo
was established at the beginning by the JECFA

is the group of
international experts

FAO and WHO
in 1980 fu

then the
same DJA

is established by the committee of
scientists to human power supply

so for Europe,
1985

Fu WHO, hoje
files in

and the JECFA had access
to documents files

this is very disturbing
first 40 milligrams DJA

is based on a study
highly controversial and jams

this is came back
on, once again

studies beginning are
highly objectionable

I is not have to
think about studying

initial'm not the
elements to judge

more than I can read
evaluations preceding

and evaluations
mentioned above that s

, and
bean doubt that this bean is removed

S, but no
files

new studies to explain
why this doubt quit

About something actually
did thirty years ago

may be regrettable, it
is often the case

Senate Commission
on Aspartame

O-Ohio Senator
Howard Metzenbaum

While waiting,
the effect "snowball"

is a bargain
for industry

is what the
evidence shows

Robert Shapiro CEO
of Nutrasweet

subsidiary Searle, which
-Searle-fu purchased

by Monsanto in 1985,
who will verify

Robert Shapiro, CEO
of Nutrasweet

Those who attack
aspartame

health and
regulatory world

The fact that all
organisms scientists

health
or

Ruling in USA and
around the world

who have examined
the data

aspartame safety
have all

conclusion: no
aspartame danger

David Hattan,
FDA Toxiclogo

The FDA has received many complaints
on aspartame have here

list harmful effects
became public

there are many harmful effects
92 complaints in total and many hundreds of thousands

Complaint headaches,
vrtigos

epilepsies
crisis

vomiting, vision
problems

Do you think this is disturbing
list?

In fact, the FDA and
the firm Searle

that manufactures
aspartame led clnicos

additional studies to
evaluate these effects

as headaches or seizures
epilepsy

all this been
carefully tested

and the result was that in
an environment controlled

and when you know
exactly the dose used

the very moment of the
individual ingestiny

that consumes one
does not get

to replicate or reproduce
these effects

Dr John Olney -
UW Neuropsychiatrist St-Louis

According to all
my knowledge

Searle jamsa appropriate
studies conducted

to determine whether
aspartame causes

problems in the central
nervous system

November
18 1996

November 18, 1996

Press conference on aspartame

Dr. Ralph Walton, Psychiatrist

Buenos das, for the last 12 years

my patients ensearon me that aspartame

Pruning cause a large number of problems

on vulnerable populations

can cause epilepsy
depression, panic

I have discussed the scientific research
international on aspartame

cientficas serious
concernan clearly that

Product safety
on human

About
164 studies 74 were established by the aspartame industry

74
say that aspartame is not danger

Ralph Walton,
sychiatrist

bean one correlation
hundred percent

between the results of the studies and orgen
financing

between the results of studies
and financing orgen

all studies funded by the
aspartame industry concluan

did not cause any trouble
and one hundred percent

truly studies
independent

concluan that had one
problem with substance

How do you explain it?

Tragically money is very powerful

The argument is serious
This suggests that

that scientists can be purchased

To be sure,
touch doors

of a prestigious institution
American Cancer Society

which just tie with industry
is often denounced

Dr. Michael Thun, epidemiologist Former President
of American Cancer Society

It is absolutely true
that industrial

which may be affected by studies
that affect their interests

attempt to influence the view favored
the public and politicians

trying to influence
times in investigations

Dr. Peter Infante,
epidemiologist

is a fact that no
well-conducted studies

and frightening
studies and often

studies are
funded

indus
ry

are designed such that it
is completely impossible

detect harmful
effects, that means

which is the scientific
literature

regularly contaminated
studies

regularly contaminated by studies

facts are not conveniently

Dr. Michael Thun, epidemiologist

It would be a good idea if the scientists

that evaluate drugs are not given

money from firms farmacuticas

or those working on products

contaminants were paid

for those who manufacture

But that is not the case

No, the reverse is a common practice

Yes, I worked
in a

Ruling agency for over
twenty five years

if they can not beat
you on the ground

science then resort
to personal attacks

, this experiment
myself

They wanted me fired
from my job

and the reason
precisely that fu

because I was
doing my work

Unfortunately it
is very common

you are
asked to

government agents who change
their interpretation of the

data they deem
as unreliable

most of the time is very
difficult in reason

of

economic situation of those
scientists who are

there in 1 hour and 50 minutes
wish them good ...

There in 1 hour and 50
minutes wish you a good ...

Unfortunately centers are rare

totally independent investigation

that ESTN protected from
Industry pressure

is the case of the Foundation
European Ramazzini

specialized private institution

in environmental cancerologa

Its researchers have conducted
two studies on aspartame

published in 2005

The first was done with rats 1800

that a dose of aspartame ingerieron

near the DJA from
the age of 8 weeks

until the age of natural death

Result: increased
lymphomas significant

and leukemias in females

The second study was
400 females are preadas

microns which were followed until death

This result confirm
the first study

which adds a significant increase

interestingly these
two studies

were rejected by
the FDA and EFSA

Dr Morando Soffritti, Director of
the Ramazzini Institute scientist

Based on our
data safely

is cancergeno for
animal experiments

Hugues Koenigswald, Head of Unit
Food Additives EFSA

There is certainly by no
mean certain failure

There is certainly not
mean certain failure

metodolgica on purpose
these studies

For example?

Well, in particular
Rats that

that were under study had

much of respiratory pathologies

Dr Morando Soffritti, Director
Scientist of the Ramazzini Institute

We agree
for a number of reasons

firstly, because
the inflammatory process

we observe in our
animals depend

often the fact that we

let them die naturally

without interrupting your life
arbitrarily

and as is the case in man
in the last phase of his life

pulmonary complications

and kidney are common

is very common to find inflammations

both the lungs and kidney

Respiratory
disease is the

origin of the tumor and therefore
can erase the tracks

is exactly what happened
in this study

The rats in the control group Tenan
the same breathing problem?

Dr Morando Soffritti, Director of
the Ramazzini Institute scientist

Of course, the
observed habamos

together
in the treated group and the control group

The only difference between the two groups
was that the group experienced

had ingested aspartame and
control group that had not ingested Koenigswald

Hughes, Head of Unit
Food Additive

EFSA Anyway
most of

results of these
studies have been

analysis invalidated
by doing

committee of experts
of the EFSA

In fact the arguments
of the EFSA

really did not convince
me, they intrigued

investigu for
know who the 21

Member of the Committee
of Food Additives EFSA

from a recent date,
each expert

must declare their
conflicts of interest

and
the declaration can be consulted on the website of EFSA

We discovered that John Christian
as the President of Larsen

Committee works to
institute funded ILSI

by multinational
agribusiness and qumicas

or Jrgen Knig tena
contract with Danone

or even that Dominique
Parent-Massin working

for Aji No Moto
japons one of the leading manufacturers of aspartame

or

Coca Cola a big
user of aspartame

I've checked all 21 members
Committee on Food Additives

Ye

I saw Dominique
arent-Massain

who is member of the working
scientist Manufacturer

Aspartame the Japanese
Aji No Moto

then, here's a real
conflict of interest

This means that when we
did the evaluation ...

this expert
can not be

rapporteur to prepare the advice of
the group and can not participate

on this issue because
dliberacin

there is a conflict
of interest

and here for example in
the case of the board

was done on aspartame
2009

Dominique Parent-Massain
did not participate?

No, its declaration of
interest was evaluated

limit she does not participate
in certain activities

of EFSA in
relation

aspartame, in Addition
to the process

habamos we
set for

do the evaluation of the
declaration of interest

the declaration of interest

Transparency in all cases limited

the declaration of interest of
Dominique Parent-Massain

I had found
on the site of the EFSA

before conducting my interviews

da are gone today
and you replaced ESTN

a new one, where experts say no

a word about this
Aji No Moto relationship with

and Coca Cola, strange coincidence

A senior leader of the
EFSA told me one day:

"Dr. Soffritti,
if we admit

results of their
studies are vlidos

deberamos ban aspartame
from early morning

you realize that's
not possible? "

Pr Professor Erik Millstone Policy How
Cientfica University of Switzerland

If they admit they made a
mistake that llevaraa

lose confidence therefore,
they fear doubtless

that may open the
floodgates

hiciero you not
a single

but some errors and
can be all

the process
defective

"can be the whole process is flawed
"

At this stage in my
research I understood

the entire system of
products Ruling

chemicals is
controlled by

industry whose main
preocupacin health is not

consumer
research but

1960 "Bread and wine
of the year 2000"

for example, raises
many concerns and

is sold in plastic bottles
oil or wine

is uncertain whether
regression

is enough to decide that
the remains of plastic

that necessarily
happens in oil

necessarily happens in the oil

or wine are not harmful

Invented over a century ago

the plastic has been imposed on all

domains of life
the electronic equipment

clothing, transport media

furniture, toys, utensils

cooking or conditioning

food product

is estimated that every European
uses an average

92 kilos of plastic per year

40% comes from food packaging

An example Bisphenol-A, called GAP

whose annual production amounts to 3 million

tonnes, is found in products

in polycarbonates as Bibern

water cylinders

microwave preparations

but also in the resins used

as coatings in containers

Allowable
laborer Dose

of bisphenol
A was set

0.05 milligrams per
kilogram of body weight

The plastic is
present everywhere

is present the world announces
ma ana

Sern our children
of this world

and grandchildren
not to vern

For a long time been
considered the

inactive-that is
unfortunately inert-

this is not the
case which is

fortuitously discovered Ana
Soto and Carlos Sonnengstain

two researchers
in cell biology

Boston Un
versity

In 1997 they worked
on cells from c

breast cancer experiment
consists cause

to Estrogen natural
female hormone

Control tubes were
kept in plastic

Pr Ana Soto - biloga Tufts University Cell
Boston

We constantly
repetamos it

result, in the absence
of Estrogen

of cancer of the cells did
not multiply within

but in the presence
of Estrogen

multiplied them and
suddenly all

c cells began
to multiply

indiscrim
nately

We think
that one

habamos had contamination
by Estrogen

finally we found
that the activity

Provena
tube in

which we retained
tissue culture

then call the manufacturer
of the pipe

quin could not give
us the explanation

we sent several
magnifiers

the Estrogen that was
done due to change

due to the plastic
formulacin

Pr Carlos Sonnenschein - Cell
Bilogo Tufts University Boston

for this reason Rehus
reveal the composition of

therefore it is thanks
to our research

independent that
we identify

the substance was
nonylphenol

The nonylphenol
as bisphenol A

hormone synthesis are
used as antioxidants

in

the plastics materials
after its discovery

the two researchers
decided to focus on BPA

in reason of its massive
utilization in food plastics

to

observe the effects on
the second generation

Here the mammary gland
of a mouse 4 months

we can see the tubes that later

will be providing milk, are not as numerous

and have few branches

now show you an animal that
has been exposed to bisphenol A

in the uterus, we can see the complexity

conduits and branches

is four months after the exhibition

this will be a situation
normal if the coffee

at this age an animal
should be as normal

therefore there is a
significant difference

pregnancy is not
a pathology

if the female
is preada

but if the mammary
gland of a female

that is not mimic
pregnancy preada

then that is
not normal

What is the dose of bisphenol A
that administered?

250 nanograms
per kilo

is a very
low dose

A 200-fold lower
than the dose DJA

The story of Ana Soto and
Carlos Sonnenschein of

U.S

chronicle in 1997 was published
in France under the title

"Man under threat
of disappearance"

is the result
of research

conducted by Professor
Theo Colborn

she has studied
the impact

of the chemical
contamination

on the fauna of
the Great Lakes

then she
realiz

the synthesis of a thousand
studies related to

evolu
ion

certain wild species
such as gulls

whales or
otters

a real job
etective

which led to the
creation of a new

scientific concept
of those

"Disruptors En
ocrinianos"

Pr Theo Colborn - Zoologist
environmental health expert

I began with identifying
all these problems

observed in these
different species

general adult
animals

They seemed normal and
when pruned pequeos-

reproduce, and when
Haban pequeos-

not reached
adulthood

if they succeeded
not live long

and were unable
to reproduce

You will be able to tell us that is a
disturbing endocriniano?

The answer is
very simple

chemistry is a
substance cul

endocriniano doing
endocriniano system?

Basically allows
to reproduce the

allows us to
function normally

the controls the entire
construction process

of a baby, from
fecundacin

until birth,
each msculo

the programming of
the brain or all

the organs
all depend

This endocriniano
system

The problem is
that we created

chemicals that
resemble

to natural
hormones and can

enter the same receptor
activating a

funcino Off
ndola

ms hormones and
that's the problem

The term "Troublemaker
Endocriniano"

fu invented during
the middle of

Winspread conferences
organized

by Theo Colborn
in 1991

All brings together
twenty scientists

that fueled his
book after

it meets every year
in a colloquium

in New Orleans, all ESTN Ana
Soto and Carlos Sonnenschein

Louis Guillette
specialist crocodile

Fred Vom Saal who works from over twenty years ago
BPA

or John McLachlan,
specialist distilbeno

or John McLachlan,
specialist distilbeno

DES in english, banned
for the last 30 years

this drug
widely prescribed

to prevent miscarriages

is considered the model

of disturbing endocrinianos

because the case is unique, not only

because the available test data

on animals but also

epidemiolgicos data of human

chemist has changed
our way of thinking

aclarndonos
what is

the endocriniana
perturbacin and that

we now call da
fetal orgen

of the adult
diseases

If you go back
60 years

distilbeno ATRS the
first hormone fu

of synthesis invented by Charlie
Dodds in 1938, had already

synthesized
bisphenol A 1936

as an Estrogen,
the distilbeno

has been used as a
support endocriniano

pregn
ncy

has been prescribed to more
than 4 million women

U.S

in the end of the
years 1940 to 1975

AFTER s you know
all the history

is found cnceres
cervical

-
Bilogo Tulane University New Orleans

I had observed
when exposed to

mice on gestation
to distilbeno?

Note effects on
offspring in

cnceres on
your system

reproduction particularly in the vagina as the case is
human

in fact all you
have found

in mice has been
verified in humans

and all that has been
in humans has also been verified in

mic

It is very disturbing
when we discovered what

habamos noticed
that females

second generation
Tenan one more early menopause

and 25 years
later we find

the same thing in women
who were exposed

So
must repeat again and again

all the consequences
of distilbeno

observed in human
have been also

in mice and
rats

and with Carlos da today
we got the same

results dbiles doses
of bisphenol A

similar to what we found
in the environment

and in this point there
is a difference

and if you we parallels
with distilbeno

that means it was not
until the 2032

to check on
humans

So be very difficult
because

distilbeno for women who
have been exposed in utero

while women that
They will have a c

cancer in 2032 they
will have no

any evidence that they were exposed to BPA at
uterus

I leave you with this
very disturbing thought

of Biology, University
of Missouri

Fred Vom Saal Pr - Bilogo
University of Missouri, Columbia

The chemical industry has
done a tremendous job

of disinformation to
convince people

we are not exposed
to bisphenol A

and the q
antity

found in our bodies are
not at all worrying

an example if you
have your dose

an example if you have your dose

BPA everyday just enough
eat Heinz ketchup

the same thing for the substances

containing lipophilic
as oil atn

the Center for Disease Control

has made various studies
to measure the level

BPA in urine and as we can

see in this national research

ms are as young,
the higher the level of BPA

That observ effects when exposed

mice on gestation

very debles dose of BPA?

Studies on
animals show

that high doses below the

Allowable Dose laborer
causes secrecin

insulin, increased
glucose rate

insulin resistance, diabetes

Heart Disease
dysfunctions

brain and problems
behavior

We also find

male and
female

uterine
fibroids, in

malformations of male
testicles, reduced sperm

amount, growth
hormones

and abnormally low
testosterone

finally, observe the
prstata cnceres

in males, breast
in females

Roselyne Bachelot, Minister of Health and Sports
France

The principle of
precaution only applies

in the absence of
reliable and in studies

this occasion reliable
studies exist

and they conclude that in the
present state of science

is given the safety of baby
bottles with bisphenol A

For several years
bisphenol A

is the subject of a
fierce struggle

that precludes
agencies of Ruling

and a number
Scientists crescent

what is involved
is not only DJA

set but all the way
are evaluated

disturbing en
ocrinianos

in which the BPA
has become the symbol

audition in the
National Assembly

in the heart of the
conflict the "

Effects of Dose Dbiles"
that toxiclogos

indus
ry

ignore and which
do not test

Interestingly
agencies of Ruling

Interestingly agencies
of Ruling

continan basing their
assessments

industry studies
whose quality is controversial

Regarding industrial
they cling

keeping the status quo
the same argument

manufacturers like aspartame

as here in the
audition organized

francs in parliament

Michel Loubry, Director Europe
West PlasticEurope

throughout the world
to present that

industrial
we need

know what
you think

health agencies that we authorize
to market different products

The current
consensus

of the five
health agencies

United States, Canada,
Europe and Japan

is the current level
of exposure

of BPA in food
application

of the population this includes
to children and babies

Andr Cicoletta, alchemist Toxiclogo
Spokesman Environment and Health Network

When I heard his
speech and you say

all agencies
agree

I say, all
agencies agreed

to say that asbestos
caused no

where is n the
victims?

The victims already
dead ESTN 3000

then the real
question

that one asks is: you
have to wait 40

50 or 60 years to
have the certainty?

Or is that from
what we know

this convergence of
animal studies

in the monkey, the
data in monkeys

are extremely
strong I think

Principle of
Caution prevails

Principle of Caution prevails

Briant Pascale, Director of the Agency AFSSA
French Healthcare Food Safety

The problem is we can not protect

appropriately to our citizens

based on the emotion

that does not mean therefore that

His words are
sense at this time

as you talk about emotion versus

to all scientific data?

It is true that the
word "emotion" is

surprising after 10
years in effect

the effects of
BPA at doses

very dbiles
sometimes

five thousand times
less than the DJA

is what
supports the

Declaration of consensus signed in
2007 by 38 international scientists

under the auspices of the
Institute National Science

Environmental Health
of the United States

Carlos Sonnenschein, Ana Soto
or

Linda Birnmbauem the new
director of NIEHS

They write: "The
pathologies

current human resemble
the effects observed

to laboratory
animals exposed

a very dbiles
dose of BPA

as increased breast cancer
and prstata

, the
diabetes type 2, obesity

or behavioral problems
such as hyperactivity

Linda Birnmbaum, Director of NIEHS.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Do you think
that the BPA

should be prohibited at least
in the bottles as they did

lately in
Canada?

I am pragmtica, I think
there's enough

Pragmtica I am, I think
that sufficient

evidence that BPA has

the potential to cause adverse effects

particularly in certain periods

very sensitive to human development

therefore, if I were a young mam

and if my baby fed with Bibern

I would not want to have BPA in their Bibern

As you explain
EFSA or the Authority

European Agency for Safety
Food cling

DJA to 50 micro grams per kilo?

Because they have not examined the new data

that's the problem, some
Ruling agencies

They are very slow to
adapt to the new science

Fred Vom Saal Pr - Bilogo
University of Missouri, Columbia

Basically we say

the calculation process
est of DJA based

false hypothesis dating from the sixteenth century

does not take into account the fact

that chemicals
react as hormones

and still no hormones
toxicologist rules

Alexandre Feigenbaum Chief
Unit of EFSA CEF

Fifteen years ago
the lord Fred Vom Saal

tries to convince
the scientific community

taking into account their
studies, not convinced

to the scientific community
and most

that are responsible for
the evaluation of risk

either the FDA, either in
New Zealand or Japan

,
BFR in Germany or the FSA in England

Everybody is in agreement
with our Gestin

of the risk evaluation and the DJA
oms

While DJT DJT: Dose laborer we
have established Tolerable

dose effect
does not work

Pr Fred vom Saal - Bilogo
Columbia University of Missouri

The principle of
dose-effect relationship

which is the corollary that
"the dose makes the poison

" is completely
errneo

this can work
for some

but not for any hormone hormones
to

to certain
hemicals

and for the natural
hormones know that

"dbiles dose"
can stimulate

while the strong
dose inhibit

while strong doses inhibit

dose for hormones
never makes the poison

the effects do not worsen
systematically

linear curve in Endocrinology

dose effect does not exist

Alexandre Feigenbaum Chief
Unit of EFSA CEF

Indeed if one finds scientists

ranging in that studies

supporters of the
effect "dose dbiles"

It is an ideology According
you "supporters"

means is no
cientist?

I do not know, you
may think that one

based view favored one has
a greater impact on the

hypothesis or unconfirmed?
is not possible

To be frank,
the response

more modern twis
Once the doors

American Association of
Cncer whose conservatism

is often
criticized but

is a reality established
cientfica

a new way to control
Products chemicals?

Dr. Michael Thun, epidemiologist Former Vice
President American Association of Cncer

is definitely evident
for many reasons

First, because
there are all

these very interesting
research

about "dose
effect dbiles"

and for certain types of
chemical substances

in particular
those having

estrognicos effects
numerous studies

showing that there are
effects at doses

extremely dbiles,
therefore

whole p
ocess

determines everything which
is reproducible or

are the implications
for cancer

are the implications for cancer

It is brand new and second

Principle of Caution seems to have

sense if there is a potential problem

better react
immediately to prevent

"Best reacting to prevent"

It means that everything is done

indeed disturbing endocrinianos

represent a large family regrouping

the plastics components

dioxins, PCBs,
Teflon

of non-stick pans,
food additives

, but also numerous
pesticides

All of these
products are

a "dbiles dose" in
our power supply

and these "dbiles dose"
jams have been tested

the same way is not
proved possible

Sinerga between residues
of different products qu

monkeys that
pollute eg

grapes analyzed in this
laboratory german

In June 2009,
EFSA published its first annual report

about pesticide
residues

75,000 products were tested in
the 27 countries of the Union

European, were
detected in total

350 pesticides in
fruits and vegetables

and 72 Grains
in a room

sample is received by at
least two pesticides

Can they interact?
With what effects?

is what is called the
"cocktail effect"

The question of the cocktail
effect is very relevant

all we
have

chemistry body burden in
english: Chemical Body Burden

is the revealed that the Center
for Disease Control Disease

Atla
ta

wearer from ten years ago a
program of Bio Monitoring

where measured traces
of the chemicals

in the blood and urine
of volunteers

In the fourth report
published in 2009

was
e

212 substances were found in almost all Americans in 2400
test

In the head and
numerous bisphenol A

Linda Birnmbauem pesticides,
Director NIEHS

in our studies,
interesndonos

on a single product
at a time chemist

while none
of us

is exposed to a
substance only

when we are
interested only

to a substance and
ignore the other

I think we
can err

fully discover the effects
that occur will be able to

Copenage
enmark

Rare are laboratories
working

on the cocktail effect
one among them

is part of the
University of Copenage

toxicologist Ulla
Haas has proven

Toxicologist Ulla Haas has proven

the mixture of three substances qumicas

considered antiendrgenos

ie affecting production

of testosterone, the hormone needed

development of males, including

procymidone fungicide recently

re evaluated by JMPR experts

The fu mixture administered to rats

in gestation and effects medan

The results are
very disturbing

Take for
xample

Ulla Haas, Toxicloga, National Institute of Alimentacin
-

Copenhagen is the distance between
year and genital part

of the animal, it
is twice as long

in the male than in
the female, is due

at endrgeno role
during development

of the fetal stage,
which ms is short

in the male is an indicator
that there is a

severe hypospadias
congenital malformacin

of the male organs
of reproduction

When habamos tested each
product separately

habamos he
found no

any effect or any
malformacin

and when we exposed
the male fetus

to a mixture of
three substances

note that 60%
of them have

pruning later one
hypospadias also

malformacin serious in
their sexual organs

working on the
toxicologist mixtures

because our
results say:

zero zero zero mas mas ago
60% of malformations

It's scary what
you say above

when we know that
every European has

what we call a
body load limit

what we observed
in rats may

what we observed in rats may

also occur in our bodies?

In fact the big problem
is that we know nothing

It is difficult to understand why this

has not been taken into account soon

When you go to the pharmacy to
buy drugs

all written in the instructions for use

you have to be careful if one takes

therefore Drug

is very clear that there may be

a combination of effects if one takes

several drugs at the same time

That's why it is not so surprising

we are ahead of the same phenomenon

contaminants chemicals

Everything indicates that the system
of Ruling

of chemicals is

at a crucial time and
be redone completely

Dbiles effect dose sensitivity
particular fetus cocktail effect

while the chronic
diseases

do not stop
in progress

called developed countries, whose head is the
cancer

whose incidence has been
multiplied by two

in the course of the
last 30 years

According to
CIRC figures

As you can
even deny

these diseases are linked to the
industrial model that characterizes

to modern
civilization ?

Christhope Wild, Director of IARC,
International Research Center

When the Cncer
retrieve its website

and the maps of the
cancer is found

that this disease
is present above

in the countries
called "developed"

for example if we take
the breast cancer

in red are the regions
where the incidence

is more elevated, is in
North Amrica

ms is high, it is in
North Amrica

Western Europe, Australia and
some in South Amrica

It's the same thing for
cancer of the prstata

cancer of the testicles, leukemia

cancer of the brain,
thyroid, pulmn

What we know is that between

80% to 90% of the
cnceres are due

on lifestyle and environmen

is what studies show

of persons
migrate from one region to another

they adopt to
put it as

type of cancer in the region
where they are installed

in the process of passing the
risk factors that lead

to ca
cer

of the rich countries to
the poorer nations like

weight o
erload

obesity, lack of
physical activity

It is because these countries adopt
our way of life?

If it is because of the
change of lifestyle

is foolish, that poisons
over da one knows

For me there is no other
means of solution for live

in good health to
eat right there

The environment
and lifestyle

here I have the two main
causes of the explosion

of the chronic
diseases, of which

the Obesity is the
most visible sign

according to official
sources 70%

of the U.S.
opulation

is overloaded
with weight

I could shoot these images
being twenty minute

in a supermarket
in Houston

In the world of research
two schools

ignored while
all indicates

that are complementary of one hand
researchers who work exclusively

on the environmental origins
of chronic diseases

ie the effects of the
chemical contamination

the other side are
the scientists

who care
life style and especially the consequences

Junk
ood

based in an excess
of fat intake

and sugars and a lack
of plant products

Professor at the University
of Qubec Richard Bliveau

is

master of thought of the second School, author of over
230

the second school,
author of more than 230

publications in journals
international medically-

the leads a team of 30 researchers

working on prevention

and treatment of cancer

Pr Richard Bliveau - biochemist
University of Qubec

One of the consequences of using

Junk food and
industrially processed products

omega-3 molecules
generated

anti inflammatory omega-6 molecules
generate pro-inflammatory type

a ratio of 1/1 and
consumed is farmer or rancher hunter in our history

spent one has a
ratio of 1/1

With the industrialization
of mostly junk food

that is used contains only
omega 6, therefore

fats that come
from industry

junk f
od,

of the transformation industry are
fats that lead to metablico level

an omega 6 omega
3 ratio 25/1

When consumed the
feed industry

one gets metabolically
fisiolgicamente

and pro-inflammatory
mode

in effect orgen of
cancer there is always one

one clul attacked by
an outside agent

which can be a virus, a chemist
product irradiacino a

if the body is
in good health

the daada clul is detected
by

the NK lymphocyte english "natural
killer" natural murderer

that pushes
suicide

is what we call
apoptosis

n chronicle and
aggression

by a chronic inflammation and aggression

standing of chemical agents

apoptosis fails and
defective clul

begins to multiply

It is the beginning of tumor
that to develop

needs to be nurtured by the network sangunea

this phenomenon is
called angiognesis

to the angiognesis trmino
leads to creaccin

of metastasis, ie
the colonization

cancerous organism by clul

In certain vegetables we eat

one called fruits and vegetables

molecules is also

that pharmacologically
have the same effect

certain drugs
chemotherapeutic

Some of these molecules are citotxicos

These molecules kill cancer

Some of these molecules
are pro-apoptotic

ie they induce
clul the cancer to suicide

Some of these molecules
are anti inflammatory

they block the inflammation
the cancerous clul

need to encourage their development

Then, as is that
measure the potential

of inhibicin of a food?

well, we do a bank
tumors, human tumors

we can buy
and this is the cancer

glioblastoma, cancer of
brain we do

grown for 24 to 48 hours

counts the number of
cells that have divided

then were exposed to
various extracts

food, here we Cherries

carrots, which shows that there is no

inhibicin much but then when

one goes with the garlic, cabbage or brussels

found in cranberry
inhibicin 90%

a glioblastoma, when one isolated

these foods when
create a cocktail

super anti cancer foods

if you take a mouse
which we implant

a human cancer

here is a mouse
that has been fed

with mouse chow

Here we take the same mouse

when one is by
mouth with cocktail

food the most anticncer
we found

in this test well in vitro and have

a reduction of 90%

tumor mass

Gradually I finished assembling

all the pieces of the puzzle

to outline a coherent set

The epidemic of chronic diseases

observed in the world
Western is due

to contamination
chemistry and particularly

the mode of transformation of
production mode

our food
where effects

of revolution agrcola
and agrifood

combine to form a
explosive cocktail

An example: India,
according to the CIRC

20 the incidence of the
most common cnceres

in the state of Orissa in the south west
pas

the cnceres are almost nonexistent
to the exception of that

mouth due to
masticacin

of snuff in this very
rural region is ignored

essentially namely
fruits and vegetables

produce grown without
pesticides they consume daily

turmeric, the yellow powder that forms the basis of
curry

known since the
dawn of time

its anti
inflammatory, so I

anticancergeno have been confirmed in
more than 3000 scientific publications

I do with
urmeric?

Make a curry and then
eats or applies

on the body
everything is good

you can mix in a glass
of water every morning

and a dozen
microbes morirn

and will not have the
skin irritations

or chickenpox, is
very good for all

disea
e,

cows can eat men can
eat goats can eat

the cat
can eat

There are obese people
in his village?

In the village is my nephew
who is the fattest

is one of the
most fat people

But he is
not obese

All there is even a
little fat person

There are people who
cancer have in town?

No,
o

know what is
cancer?

The cancer? is
a disease?

When the person
reaches the body

dies in 3 6
months

Not far at all
Bhubaneswar, the capital

Not far at all
Bhubaneswar, the capital

Orissa Society of India
Cncer has a symposium of

International in collaboration
with the Institute

Anderson of Houston,
one of the most large

research centers
of cancer in the world

The theme of this third edition is called

"Cncer and inflammation"
They speak of course

specificity of India that is

in the process of disappearing
particularly

in the state of Punjab
the cradle of the Revolution

Green but also of
large metropolos

mode is adopted where
Western life

Prof. Arvind Chaturvedi, Director of
Research Institute in New Delhi

During my exposure to them
talk of evolution

world of cancer,
in the Western world

the cancer that has
the highest prevalence

it is for the woman breast

and for the man prstata

life of our
country

where the incidence of the
disease is increasing

is not even as high as
in Western countries

but will increase in reason
change

the lifestyle and
food habits

If we do not take into
account the lesson

to pay a very high price,
the answer is simple

no chemicals
ontaminants

is simply not the
polluting chemicals

not processed food

a healthy life
with biological food

no red meat
alcohol, snuff

smoking or chewing etc.

"Let your food be your remedy
and your medicine your food "

Postscript

Jean-Charles Bocquet, Director of UIPP
Union of Industries of Plant Protection

If good morning, Marie-Monique Robin
I made a request for an interview

You Rehus, but everyone wanted to be sure anyway
of opinion did not change

Well, no change
of opinion

Phil Newton, European Association
of Pesticide Industry

I Sorry, but our position
will not change

Thomas Lyall, Dow
AgroSciences

We want to work on
something really

In a written response and subtitling francs to
espaol by Marisol Paredes Silva Guenot

Yannick Chenet (14:59)
quin has testified in this film, I died in January 2011

Other documentaries Marie-Monique Robin:
The World According to Monsanto