All language subtitles for Intel vs AMD Laptops - FINALLY a Clear Winner_-en

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,060 --> 00:00:05,040 folks what I have in front of me are two 1 00:00:02,399 --> 00:00:07,200 identical Lenovo slim 7 Pro X laptops 2 00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:09,960 and I mean identical with the only 3 00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:11,880 difference being the price so one has an 4 00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:15,240 Intel Core i7 CPU while the other one 5 00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:17,520 has an AMD ryzen 9 CPU so that gives us 6 00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:19,020 an unique opportunity to compare apples 7 00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:21,119 to apples so with all of these things 8 00:00:19,020 --> 00:00:22,920 being equal what should you buy 9 00:00:21,119 --> 00:00:24,539 considering these devices are going to 10 00:00:22,920 --> 00:00:26,160 be paying around for the rest of the 11 00:00:24,539 --> 00:00:27,779 year now I already covered the Intel 12 00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:29,699 version of this laptop which you can 13 00:00:27,779 --> 00:00:32,040 find that video right over here the Pro 14 00:00:29,699 --> 00:00:34,200 X itself is probably one of the best 15 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:36,600 thin and light laptops out there right 16 00:00:34,200 --> 00:00:39,840 now regardless whether if it features an 17 00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:42,000 Intel CPU or an AMD CPU let me explain 18 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:44,700 while both of these devices weigh around 19 00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:46,680 3.2 pounds they feature h-series 20 00:00:44,700 --> 00:00:49,739 processors that run between 35 to 45 21 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:52,440 Watts instead of the usual 10 to 28 watt 22 00:00:49,739 --> 00:00:54,239 ultra low power CPUs we get in these 23 00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:56,039 kinds of form factors so you're 24 00:00:54,239 --> 00:00:58,379 certainly getting a lot of power in a 25 00:00:56,039 --> 00:01:02,399 fin chassis on one hand we have a ryzen 26 00:00:58,379 --> 00:01:05,700 9 6900 HS CPU with 16 threads and on the 27 00:01:02,399 --> 00:01:07,320 other hand we have a core i712 700h with 28 00:01:05,700 --> 00:01:09,360 20 threads now in these particular 29 00:01:07,320 --> 00:01:11,700 configs the AMD laptop has twice the 30 00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:13,619 memory compared to the Intel model which 31 00:01:11,700 --> 00:01:16,140 is an option that you can customize as 32 00:01:13,619 --> 00:01:18,720 well but the memory on this is also 33 00:01:16,140 --> 00:01:21,540 running at a whopping 6400 megahertz and 34 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:24,479 both of them sport nvidia's RTX 3050 35 00:01:21,540 --> 00:01:27,180 gpus now from the outside these are both 36 00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:29,280 exactly the same chassis with the same 37 00:01:27,180 --> 00:01:31,680 styling and build quality the AMD 38 00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:33,439 version comes in Onyx gray while the 39 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:36,479 Intel version comes in what they call 40 00:01:33,439 --> 00:01:38,759 Ultimate gray though I would just call 41 00:01:36,479 --> 00:01:40,860 it silver even the displays are exact 42 00:01:38,759 --> 00:01:43,380 replicas guys the they feature a 43 00:01:40,860 --> 00:01:45,720 gorgeous 3K high resolution panel with a 44 00:01:43,380 --> 00:01:47,880 120hz refresh rate so if you're into 45 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:50,820 creative Focus tasks or even a bit of 46 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:52,799 gaming these have you covered plus they 47 00:01:50,820 --> 00:01:55,079 feature 16 by 10 aspect ratios so 48 00:01:52,799 --> 00:01:56,939 nothing really to complain here I guess 49 00:01:55,079 --> 00:01:59,880 the only real benefit with the Intel 50 00:01:56,939 --> 00:02:02,220 laptop is a faster i o since you get two 51 00:01:59,880 --> 00:02:03,780 Thunderbolt 4 ports with data transfer 52 00:02:02,220 --> 00:02:07,740 speeds up to 40 gigabits per second 53 00:02:03,780 --> 00:02:09,959 compared to USB 3.2 Gen 2 at 10 gigabits 54 00:02:07,740 --> 00:02:12,180 per second and you get an HDMI 2.1 port 55 00:02:09,959 --> 00:02:14,400 on Intel but that's been replaced with a 56 00:02:12,180 --> 00:02:16,080 USB type a port on AMD either way you 57 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:19,980 pretty much get everything that you 58 00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:22,260 possibly need for ports whoa dude that 59 00:02:19,980 --> 00:02:24,840 was so rich last night you went to the 60 00:02:22,260 --> 00:02:27,780 ridge of course I had a secret code what 61 00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:30,060 is it it was rich that's rich man that's 62 00:02:27,780 --> 00:02:31,920 right wait a second is that a ridge yep 63 00:02:30,060 --> 00:02:34,440 didn't have to go anywhere last time 64 00:02:31,920 --> 00:02:36,420 dude that's so rare an evolution in slim 65 00:02:34,440 --> 00:02:39,239 Towers designed to fit your space for 66 00:02:36,420 --> 00:02:41,700 gaming or entertainment Standing Tall or 67 00:02:39,239 --> 00:02:44,220 laying flat with powerful fans to scare 68 00:02:41,700 --> 00:02:46,800 the heat at Gen 4 Rising cables included 69 00:02:44,220 --> 00:02:49,140 so you can find your own balance that's 70 00:02:46,800 --> 00:02:51,260 rich for you the Talk of the Town rigid 71 00:02:49,140 --> 00:02:53,519 Billow now what about pricing because 72 00:02:51,260 --> 00:02:56,340 that's one of the main factors that will 73 00:02:53,519 --> 00:02:59,700 probably lead you down either the Intel 74 00:02:56,340 --> 00:03:02,400 or AMD path so the slim 7 Pro X starts 75 00:02:59,700 --> 00:03:05,400 around 1400 and that gets here ryzen 7 6 76 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:07,260 800 HS but our sample with the ryzen 9 77 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:10,440 and upgraded storage and memory costs 78 00:03:07,260 --> 00:03:12,599 about 1800 bucks the slim 7i Pro X only 79 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:14,180 comes with the core i7 CPU which is what 80 00:03:12,599 --> 00:03:17,340 we have over here and it costs you about 81 00:03:14,180 --> 00:03:20,640 1600 but if you upgrade the memory and 82 00:03:17,340 --> 00:03:23,040 storage the AMD laptop is five dollars 83 00:03:20,640 --> 00:03:25,379 more expensive than the Intel model 84 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:27,300 it's pretty crazy right so with that out 85 00:03:25,379 --> 00:03:29,220 of the way let's get into performance 86 00:03:27,300 --> 00:03:31,980 and I'm going to kick things off with 87 00:03:29,220 --> 00:03:35,220 the way how power is being handled by 88 00:03:31,980 --> 00:03:37,379 the CPUs and gpus and right off the bat 89 00:03:35,220 --> 00:03:40,680 they are pretty interesting since the 90 00:03:37,379 --> 00:03:42,420 12700h version gets fed more juice in 91 00:03:40,680 --> 00:03:45,420 intelligent and battery saving modes 92 00:03:42,420 --> 00:03:47,459 while the 6900 HS has an edge in extreme 93 00:03:45,420 --> 00:03:49,200 either way extreme mode has the 94 00:03:47,459 --> 00:03:51,239 temperatures go right up close to each 95 00:03:49,200 --> 00:03:53,819 cpu's thermal limit while the other 96 00:03:51,239 --> 00:03:55,620 modes are a lot better managed but let's 97 00:03:53,819 --> 00:03:58,379 look beyond that comparison for a second 98 00:03:55,620 --> 00:04:01,019 because the Extreme Performance mode has 99 00:03:58,379 --> 00:04:03,360 a power level that I usually see on a 100 00:04:01,019 --> 00:04:05,700 legit gaming laptop and not a thin and 101 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:07,319 light device that's only 0.63 inches 102 00:04:05,700 --> 00:04:08,700 thick Lenovo has really beefed up the 103 00:04:07,319 --> 00:04:11,040 cooling system for this generation guys 104 00:04:08,700 --> 00:04:13,019 so the Pro X is able to handle this heat 105 00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:15,420 load without ever reaching the 100 106 00:04:13,019 --> 00:04:17,699 degree Mark even when gaming at maximum 107 00:04:15,420 --> 00:04:20,459 power these laptops don't get overly hot 108 00:04:17,699 --> 00:04:22,860 but it does start hitting some elevated 109 00:04:20,459 --> 00:04:25,680 noise levels the RTX 3050 being able to 110 00:04:22,860 --> 00:04:27,479 pull up to 50 Watts or more means it 111 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:30,240 should be very competitive with other 112 00:04:27,479 --> 00:04:33,360 laptops that feature higher end RTX 3050 113 00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:36,120 TI gpus at lower power levels especially 114 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:37,979 on the Intel side since it gets fed a 115 00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:39,540 bit more power the noise levels between 116 00:04:37,979 --> 00:04:41,639 these two laptops is pretty much 117 00:04:39,540 --> 00:04:43,979 identical though I will say the Intel 118 00:04:41,639 --> 00:04:45,720 system is just a bit quieter in the 119 00:04:43,979 --> 00:04:47,460 highest performance mode either way both 120 00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:49,620 Pro X's are some of the quietest laptops 121 00:04:47,460 --> 00:04:50,699 we've tested in a while except when 122 00:04:49,620 --> 00:04:53,160 you're running them in Extreme 123 00:04:50,699 --> 00:04:56,280 Performance modes so that's as a stage 124 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:59,340 for battery life which has always been a 125 00:04:56,280 --> 00:05:01,919 strength of amb laptops but this time we 126 00:04:59,340 --> 00:05:04,380 have a role reversal while both of these 127 00:05:01,919 --> 00:05:06,840 slim 7i Pro X models have the exact same 128 00:05:04,380 --> 00:05:09,240 71r battery we actually got a better 129 00:05:06,840 --> 00:05:11,400 result on the intel on the lake base 130 00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:13,680 model now is this a freak accident or 131 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:15,540 the start of a new pattern but for real 132 00:05:13,680 --> 00:05:18,240 guys getting almost 10 hours of battery 133 00:05:15,540 --> 00:05:19,860 is pretty excellent the flow x13 blows 134 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:22,440 everything else out of the water despite 135 00:05:19,860 --> 00:05:25,919 having the same AMD processor and a 136 00:05:22,440 --> 00:05:27,840 smaller battery than this laptop but we 137 00:05:25,919 --> 00:05:29,759 think Asus might be doing some magic 138 00:05:27,840 --> 00:05:31,560 optimizations in the background 139 00:05:29,759 --> 00:05:34,500 switching to something more intensive 140 00:05:31,560 --> 00:05:36,300 and okay wow that's the type of AMD 141 00:05:34,500 --> 00:05:39,240 battery life results that we love to see 142 00:05:36,300 --> 00:05:41,340 the reason that this AMD model gets way 143 00:05:39,240 --> 00:05:44,039 better numbers than it's twin is because 144 00:05:41,340 --> 00:05:46,020 the Intel chip is being fed 40 more 145 00:05:44,039 --> 00:05:48,419 power while running in the same power 146 00:05:46,020 --> 00:05:50,820 mode basically it's a trade-off between 147 00:05:48,419 --> 00:05:52,500 better performance versus better 148 00:05:50,820 --> 00:05:54,240 endurance so that's a beautiful 149 00:05:52,500 --> 00:05:56,280 transition into the most important 150 00:05:54,240 --> 00:05:58,500 comparison for this video 151 00:05:56,280 --> 00:06:01,680 the benchmarks or the performance 152 00:05:58,500 --> 00:06:04,139 AMD versus Intel in an identical chassis 153 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:06,780 and running at very similar power levels 154 00:06:04,139 --> 00:06:08,520 that's pretty crazy and quite a unique 155 00:06:06,780 --> 00:06:10,199 opportunity for us so we basically set a 156 00:06:08,520 --> 00:06:12,419 threshold of 50 decibels for our testing 157 00:06:10,199 --> 00:06:13,979 and thankfully both laptops ran under 158 00:06:12,419 --> 00:06:16,500 that in their Extreme Performance modes 159 00:06:13,979 --> 00:06:19,919 we also sprinkled in a handful of other 160 00:06:16,500 --> 00:06:22,560 laptops all featuring RTX 3050 or 3050 161 00:06:19,919 --> 00:06:25,919 TI gpus for this comparison so starting 162 00:06:22,560 --> 00:06:28,560 off with cinebench single core is where 163 00:06:25,919 --> 00:06:31,500 the AMD model takes its biggest loss the 164 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:32,880 ryzen 6000 series just can't compete 165 00:06:31,500 --> 00:06:34,979 with all the lake ships guys when it 166 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:37,680 comes to single core performance it just 167 00:06:34,979 --> 00:06:39,900 loses in both IPC and the frequency the 168 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:42,180 situation isn't amazing in cinebench 169 00:06:39,900 --> 00:06:44,880 multi-threaded either because right away 170 00:06:42,180 --> 00:06:47,039 you can see the benefits of that 14 core 171 00:06:44,880 --> 00:06:49,199 Intel chip that has over the 8 core 172 00:06:47,039 --> 00:06:51,419 ryzen chip however the only difference 173 00:06:49,199 --> 00:06:53,580 is about nine percent and as you will 174 00:06:51,419 --> 00:06:56,340 see in some of the other benchmarks the 175 00:06:53,580 --> 00:06:58,860 difference is never that large again in 176 00:06:56,340 --> 00:07:01,139 longer tests in fact as we go through 177 00:06:58,860 --> 00:07:03,240 the charts you can see how amazingly 178 00:07:01,139 --> 00:07:05,880 similar both laptops perform sometimes 179 00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:07,919 with half sense separating them and 180 00:07:05,880 --> 00:07:09,840 sometimes with the ryzen model even 181 00:07:07,919 --> 00:07:12,060 winning like in Maya which is our 182 00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:14,460 longest test overall though when you 183 00:07:12,060 --> 00:07:16,560 take these slim 7 Pro X's super compact 184 00:07:14,460 --> 00:07:18,360 footprint into account it's actually 185 00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:21,120 pretty competitive against larger 186 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:24,180 laptops like the Xbox 15 and the Acer 187 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:25,919 Nitro 5. but compactness does come at a 188 00:07:24,180 --> 00:07:28,020 price though guys and the prox series 189 00:07:25,919 --> 00:07:30,360 does tend to get a bit more expensive 190 00:07:28,020 --> 00:07:32,280 than some of the others in the charts 191 00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:33,539 now DaVinci resolves performance is 192 00:07:32,280 --> 00:07:35,819 pretty much in line with our 193 00:07:33,539 --> 00:07:38,340 expectations since both laptops share an 194 00:07:35,819 --> 00:07:40,500 identical GPU operating at a similar 195 00:07:38,340 --> 00:07:42,360 power level Adobe Premiere Pro on the 196 00:07:40,500 --> 00:07:44,520 other hand sees this AMD model fall 197 00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:46,259 behind but that's only because it lacks 198 00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:48,900 the quick sync feature of the Intel chip 199 00:07:46,259 --> 00:07:51,360 the 6900hs does have built-in integrated 200 00:07:48,900 --> 00:07:53,880 Graphics too but it hasn't received the 201 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:56,580 same level of love and attention from 202 00:07:53,880 --> 00:07:59,240 Adobe so the discrete GPU has to do all 203 00:07:56,580 --> 00:08:01,979 the work now speaking of that RTX 3050 204 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:04,199 while these are the lowest end of the 205 00:08:01,979 --> 00:08:06,240 RTX 3000 mobile family it is still 206 00:08:04,199 --> 00:08:08,280 infinitely more powerful than the 207 00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:10,199 integrated gpus found on either of these 208 00:08:08,280 --> 00:08:13,020 CPUs so don't expect to play any games 209 00:08:10,199 --> 00:08:16,139 at the native 3K resolution but gaming 210 00:08:13,020 --> 00:08:18,840 at 1080p on these 120hz displays isn't a 211 00:08:16,139 --> 00:08:21,599 bad experience the gpus 4 gigabytes of 212 00:08:18,840 --> 00:08:23,340 vram is definitely a limitation but you 213 00:08:21,599 --> 00:08:25,979 will generally run out of GPU power 214 00:08:23,340 --> 00:08:28,680 before hitting that vram bottleneck so 215 00:08:25,979 --> 00:08:30,720 with basically identical gpus it is no 216 00:08:28,680 --> 00:08:33,479 surprise to see the Intel model post 217 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:35,339 better frame rates across the board the 218 00:08:33,479 --> 00:08:37,500 all the lake architecture is quite a bit 219 00:08:35,339 --> 00:08:40,320 newer than the one found in the ryzen 220 00:08:37,500 --> 00:08:42,659 6000 chips and it just rocks in gaming 221 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:44,459 guys plus there's that extra 4 watts of 222 00:08:42,659 --> 00:08:47,160 power compared to the competition though 223 00:08:44,459 --> 00:08:49,680 this High wattage RTX 3050 is putting up 224 00:08:47,160 --> 00:08:52,800 a very good fight against the RTX 3050 225 00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:54,899 TI's except in the Nitro 5. that one is 226 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:57,300 just Untouchable since it's a legit 227 00:08:54,899 --> 00:08:59,100 full-size gaming laptop by the the way 228 00:08:57,300 --> 00:09:02,100 we definitely recommend gaming with 229 00:08:59,100 --> 00:09:04,080 headphones or earbuds in because this 230 00:09:02,100 --> 00:09:06,060 laptop almost hits 50 decibels in 231 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:08,640 Extreme Performance mode so it's not 232 00:09:06,060 --> 00:09:10,380 super Pleasant to your ears but sadly 233 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:12,120 it's the only way to get a really 234 00:09:10,380 --> 00:09:13,860 acceptable gaming experience you only 235 00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:15,839 lose about one quarter of your GP 236 00:09:13,860 --> 00:09:18,420 performance if you switch to intelligent 237 00:09:15,839 --> 00:09:20,459 cooling mode so this was a really 238 00:09:18,420 --> 00:09:23,279 interesting opportunity for us to test 239 00:09:20,459 --> 00:09:25,380 two totally different mobile CPUs in one 240 00:09:23,279 --> 00:09:28,500 identical laptop especially with an 241 00:09:25,380 --> 00:09:30,360 identical GPU as well and honestly the 242 00:09:28,500 --> 00:09:33,240 results were way closer than I would 243 00:09:30,360 --> 00:09:36,480 have thought so ultimately my decision 244 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:38,880 would come down to price you see as 245 00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:40,500 config this AMD model is sold by Lenovo 246 00:09:38,880 --> 00:09:42,000 for about sixteen seventy five dollars 247 00:09:40,500 --> 00:09:43,380 while the Intel version is five dollars 248 00:09:42,000 --> 00:09:45,779 cheaper which is 249 00:09:43,380 --> 00:09:47,700 pretty crazy you never hear that from an 250 00:09:45,779 --> 00:09:49,080 Intel versus AMD laptop conversation 251 00:09:47,700 --> 00:09:51,060 personally 252 00:09:49,080 --> 00:09:53,279 we wouldn't actually buy either of these 253 00:09:51,060 --> 00:09:54,839 at those prices but when discounted 254 00:09:53,279 --> 00:09:57,000 price return and if the price difference 255 00:09:54,839 --> 00:09:58,080 is drastic where the AMD version is 256 00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:00,000 cheaper 257 00:09:58,080 --> 00:10:02,040 that's what I would get the slightly 258 00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:04,740 better gaming results and few instances 259 00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:07,380 of superior 2D performance aren't worth 260 00:10:04,740 --> 00:10:09,240 that much of an Intel price premium Now 261 00:10:07,380 --> 00:10:10,740 if both of these laptops were priced the 262 00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:13,200 same which they are the time of making 263 00:10:10,740 --> 00:10:15,420 this video I would pick the Intel model 264 00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:17,519 simply because it seems to be getting 265 00:10:15,420 --> 00:10:19,800 better battery life and that's one of 266 00:10:17,519 --> 00:10:21,240 the cornerstones of a thinella laptop in 267 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:23,160 the first place 268 00:10:21,240 --> 00:10:25,200 so that note thanks so much for watching 269 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:26,760 uh I hope you will take away something 270 00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:28,260 from this video it is an interesting 271 00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:30,480 comparison something unique that we 272 00:10:28,260 --> 00:10:34,260 haven't actually got to test out an AMD 273 00:10:30,480 --> 00:10:35,399 versus Intel same laptop same GPU 274 00:10:34,260 --> 00:10:37,200 um but yeah let us know what you guys 275 00:10:35,399 --> 00:10:39,660 think about in the comments uh which one 276 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:41,040 would you pick and why well I'm gonna 277 00:10:39,660 --> 00:10:44,540 peace out 278 00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:44,540 and spend responsibly folks 21349

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.