All language subtitles for War Game 2024 English

That's
interesting. Trunk checks.

Yeah. We're not
gonna drive shit in there.

This is gonna be
the most high vis area.

So this is where we're gonna
want people seeing, you know,

US troops gunning
down patriotic Americans.

Can you keep tabs on
the suburban behind us

with your side
view? Not like hardcore.

I just wanna
see if they follow us

all the way across the bridge.

Key is trying to
lure the response teams

into Virginia
- Mm-hmm [affirmative].

and then cutting the bridges.

Yeah. 'Cause all of our
insiders are in the DC Guard.

Correct?
- Mm-hmm [affirmative].

Here's Washington Monument,

here's the White House,
- Mm-hmm [affirmative].

a dead reckoning from us
to the Washington Monument,

and you're gonna watch
that fucker right across.

Yep.

A little gasoline,
you've got a big distraction.

Right.

- That close to the Pentagon's
- Yeah.

gonna get a response.

Right.

Ready?

Yep.

My fellow Americans,

when our ancestors came
to these shores centuries ago,

they brought with
them two essential elements

that would
ensure their survival,

faith, and purpose.

Faith is a gift from God to us.

Purpose is what
gives us the ability

to put that power to use.

It is undeniable that this
past election was stolen

and it is Hotham
who is attempting a coup

to consolidate his illegitimate
power and eliminate

our God-given
freedoms.

To all those
members of the armed forces

watching and listening,

join with us to
defend our liberty and land,

with faith and purpose. America,

God and freedom will prevail.

Yeah. Yep.

Should I be
friendlier?

- No. Mm-mm [negative].
- No?

- I'm gonna join up.
- Yeah?

You motivated yourself?

- I did.
- Okay.

Guys happy with
that?

About a year ago,
three Generals penned an op-ed

in the Washington Post
that said,

"We're increasingly concerned
about extremism in the ranks

and that the next
insurrection like activity

could involve members
of the active duty military.

One of the recommendations
the generals made was that

the Pentagon and
DHS should take some time

to war game what
that might look like

and what
the implications would be.

I am President Hotham,

Commander in Chief
of the US Armed Forces,

Chief Executive of
the United States of America,

elected to a four-year term,

just completed
reelection campaign,

which is under fault's dispute.

So I'm playing the role of
Chief of National Guard Bureau

and the DC Commander.

Well, I am
Secretary of Homeland Security.

It's a tough job.
- It's a tough job, right?

- Somebody's gotta do it,
- Somebody.

right? Might as
well be you, right?

Yeah.

Are you nervous at all?

It's not a nervousness
of playing the exercise,

as much as we're probably gonna
have to make decisions about

level of force.
- Mm-hmm [affirmative].

And that, that's very heavy.

I've been, I've been, I've
been in the real situation room.

These are
really tough decisions.

I'm David Crease.

I'm the Director of
National Intelligence

for this exercise.
- Oh, great.

- Just wanted to say hello.
- Great.

You'll be
seeing me at the table.

- Okay, great.
- Yeah.

- All right. Tell me,
- Enjoy it.

what's your background here?
- CIA.

That voice is
not the Pentagon.

We're not DHS, but
we do have an incredible number

of folks in our network
who have held positions

in these agencies
who volunteered to serve

and are taking this
issue really seriously.

So we thought why not
bring them all together

and where things go from there

will be up to the role players.

Seated around this
room is an incredible diversity

of professional experience

spanning the last five
presidential administrations.

All of us are here today

because we are
increasingly concerned

by the rise of
domestic extremism

and radicalization
in this country,

specifically within
the active duty military forces.

I don't need to tell you that
the alarms are flashing red.

Most of you have at
one point, sworn under oath

to protect and
defend the constitution.

Today, we'll examine
a frightening scenario.

What happens when those
in uniform break that oath?

I think what
brought us all together is

a need to be better prepared,

and the exercise is

Introduction to
Coup Prevention 101.

I'm a retired
Lieutenant General.

I spent 37 years in the Army.

I'm pretty
adamantly non-partisan.

In fact, that was one of
my conditions for participation,

that it was not
a partisan exercise

because this should
not be about politics.

This is about security.

So we have the situation room,

we've got
the press briefing room,

and we've got the Red Cell room.

Classic
terminology for war gaming...

White cell is your game masters

controlling
the scenario and adding injects.

Blue team is
typically the good guys.

And then
Red Cell is your opponent.

Me and my team,
we spend all day, every day,

studying extremist
movements.

In the simulation, we're
like the real chaos agents,

like we're the ground,

ground teams, right?
- Right. Yeah. Yeah.

You guys are the,

the Bannon stone figures.
- But we're in touch.

Yes.

The events of January 6th
surprised a lot of Americans.

It did not surprise those
who followed the far right.

These threats
are advancing in a way

that the average
American just has no idea.

Eroding confidence in
democracy was successful.

Next January 6th is
another inflection point.

These insurrectionists
have recognized

that this certification
of the next president

is a vulnerability
that can be exploited.

Three, two... From Washington,

I'm Isha Sesay.

The question on the minds
of many at this moment is,

is our government and military

prepared to face this challenge?

We're certainly as
a country more divided

than any time in my lifetime.

I thought that fever would
break. I don't think
that it has.

What I wanna do is
think about the unthinkable,

the plausible
scenario that seems implausible.

And do all of this

with sort of the ghosts of
January 6th hovering over us,

knowing what could
happen if the government

doesn't respond
in the right way.

This isn't scripted.

I have no idea if at
the end of this exercise

this country
collapses or comes together.

The scenario
that we've designed

begins with
a contested election.

You have members
of the active military

siding with the losing
candidate and disobeying orders.

Welcome everyone.
Thank you for being here.

You have six hours
to avert a civil war

and ensure
the peaceful transfer of power.

If the clock runs
out and Congress fails

to certify the election results,

you lose and
the insurrection to swing.

This is not something

that is just one
party versus another.

It is a force that could
tear our country apart.

What we are here
to do is stress test

our national security system.

I want them to be prepared
for the worst case scenarios.

If the bad guys in this
scenario win, democracy loses.

Mr. President, we are
gonna be starting the game

in 5,

4,

3,

2,

1.

We're breaking
into regular programming

to bring you this
special report from the Capitol,

where Congress
is due to convene,

to certify President John
Hotham's election to
a second term

after his defeat
of Robert Strickland.

But we are now getting word
that thousands have gathered

on the National Mall
with hundreds of protestors

currently facing off
against law enforcement.

This is what
we know at the moment.

A security checkpoint
at the Capitol has appeared

to have been breached by
protestors for Robert Strickland

with the help of DC Guardsmen
assigned to two units

that had been
securing the checkpoints.

This is breaking
news. It is fast developing.

We are awaiting word from
the Pentagon and the White House

on how severe
the security situation is

and if there is
indeed a breakdown

in military ranks.

Mr. President, ladies
and gentlemen, good morning.

I'm here to
brief you on an evolving

situation at the US Capitol.

We've identified a group known
as the, "Order of Columbus,"

that we believe is
behind the violence.

It's a very dynamic situation,

both what is
occurring on the ground,

as well as our understanding
of that is evolving.

What we have heard in
this unexpected breach was that

the protestors have
demonstrated evolved tactics,

evolved communications,

and evolved weapons
from what we saw in 2021.

So the Order of Columbus

is part of
the sovereign citizen movement.

It is founded on the belief that

the founders
established the United States

based on biblical interpretation
and that therefore,

the existing government
is largely not legitimate.

Part of the Order
of Columbus' efforts

involve registering
themselves as churches.

They do this for at
least a couple of reasons.

One is to escape financial
scrutiny and oversight,

and the next is to
provide some limited protection

against public
disclosure of their activities.

And consequently,
they view themselves as

immune from
the existing government.

That's all
the information I have for now.

If there's something you'd
like me to go through again

or explain further,
I'd be happy to do so.

Pete, do you have any idea

how many people
are at the Capitol?

Sir, estimate on
the mall is several thousand,

less than 10,000.

The FBI, along with
DOD investigative entities,

estimate that of
approximately the 2,700

DC National Guard personnel
protecting the Capitol,

approximately 180
of them are believed

to be affiliated
with the Order of Columbus.

Secret Service
describes the situation as dicey

and a powder keg
waiting to explode.

I'm about to
drop the, the DOD one

right now.

Can, can I interrupt? Mr.
President, we're hearing that

the movement on
the Capitol is escalating.

I think we need
to make a statement.

It needs to be clear on
what's gonna happen if in fact

this continues and
this movement continues.

And so I think it's,
time is of the essence

to make a strong
statement right now,

that we're in charge of this.

We are not gonna let
another 2021 happen again.

Mr. President,
the fact that we have breaches

being facilitated
by the National Guard

is complicating the situation,

even though there's
multiple redundancies

in place.
- One.

We now are
working with our partners

to pull them off the street

so that we can replace
them with other service members.

We have to get
them off the street.

The second thing is
that we're gonna have to

continue to monitor social media

so that we can pinpoint
who some of our members are

that may be problematic.

So in other
words, you are confirming

that there are
National Guard that have in fact

led protestors
through. Have they been secured?

And have they been put in
a secure place for processing

because they are not
- So...

doing their duty right now?
- That's correct.

Sir, if I can
give you an update.

DHS, we do have a word
out with Maryland and Virginia,

the law enforcement
community there.

They are prepared to
surge if we need that.

So if we give 'em
the word that wheels up now,

they're gonna go wheels up.

We don't wanna show up with
a force that is overwhelming,

too large, or with a force that
is too small and is gonna be

overrun and therefore is
going to look like we don't,

we're not
capable of stopping this.

Suggestions for next steps.

Often I think,
we want to perceive a leader

as someone who will
just boldly charge ahead.

But I think
effective leaders are those

that first listen and maybe
listen more than they even talk,

and try to draw on
the best of everyone around them

to reach sort of
that considered judgment.

Mr. President, I,
I do think it's going to

potentially escalate rapidly.
- If we overreact,

I think it's gonna come back

and it'll haunt
your entire presidency,

but we wanna be
ready if we need to react.

My understanding
is they've already

breached to the point
of being trespassers.

I think that what you need,
Mr. President, you know,

with all due deference
to the, to the secretary,

and I completely
understand what you're saying,

I think what the public saw
in 2021 was an under reaction.

I don't think
anyone is anticipating

we need the full
strength of the military,

but we have to respond

so we don't have a repeat
of what happened in 2021.

So that's the balance.
Do you start with a criticism?

A military intervention to
basically seat this president?

Or do you start with
a, with a scene that we saw,

you know, four years
ago, which also will taint the,

the people's
attitudes about democracy?

And to me at this point, we
cannot underreact to the threat.

There is
another element here too,

and that is religious liberties
because this, these folks

have ostensibly declared
themselves as a quote, "Church."

Well, I, I, I, just from
my personal view right now,

that's total BS and we will
be looking at whether or not

that we can crack that code.

But it's also
something that is very delicate

to deal with
from a public relations

about freedom of religion.

No one, no one
thinks that's a church.

It is critically important

that if we have any additional
intel that's been overlooked,

that we get that intel
to this table right now.

We've pissed off
a lot of senior ranking folks

from all five
presidential administrations.

- Doing my job. Yeah.
- Great job.

- They're stressed.
- I know. Yeah.

You could see
the sweat on their brows.

This scenario is
developed to reflect

a lot of what
happened on January 6th,

but with
the twist that this time,

members of the National Guard
who have been brought in

to protect the Capitol,
actually join the insurrection

and turn their weapons
around on the folks that

they are there to
protect.

The military
probably is not doing enough

to deal with this question
of extremism within the ranks.

It's not just us,
democracy defenders,

that have learned from this.

It's also
the democracy offenders,

the authoritarians
that are looking to

advance the cause of stealing
elections, retaining power.

And they've probably learned
that you need the elites,

you need military behind it

to conduct
a more organized coup.

I'm a Marine Corps veteran.
I obviously believe deeply

in our military
and our armed forces,

but we also
recognize this growing threat.

It's not
something we're making up.

These are all
bright red warning signs

and something that deeply
concerns us about our democracy.

I was definitely
not your typical Marine.

I came in in the first
class of marine officers

who could be openly gay.

I was a liberal human
rights activist, lesbian,

combat engineer, marine officer,
and still made, you know,

some of the most
incredible friends of my life.

So that is one of the things

that's really motivating
me about this exercise is

seeing this sort of
widening gulf in our society

and knowing that my
brothers and sisters in arms

are being targeted
for extremist recruitment

in a way that will
continue to divide this country

and could
potentially cause real harm.

I still have
a fundamental confidence

in the military at large,
but the question would be...

What happens if
there is a violent effort

to hold the White House
and the only,

the only
institution that's capable

of enforcing the law
happens to be the military,

happens to be
the National Guard.

That, that aspect
of it concerned me.

I am humbled to
come before you today.

For the last 20
years, it has been an honor

to represent and protect this
great country. As a young man,

I decided I wanted to spend
my life serving this nation

that gave my family refuge
from authoritarian oppression.

We do not serve any political
party. We serve the nation.

Why did I choose to report
the president's corruption

at personal cost?
Because I did not put my own

personal interests
ahead of what my duties were.

- You wanna try to pull now?
- Yep.

- Okay.
- We can drop TP2.

Welcome back everyone
to our breaking news coverage

of the Capitol in Crisis.

INN can confirm
that both Houses of Congress

have been forced to evacuate

to a secure
location due to violence

outside the Capitol.

The formal
counting of electoral votes

to certify
President-elect Hotham's win

over Governor Robert Strickland
is on hold

until the Capitol is secured.

We have reports
that the leadership of
the Order of Columbus

is actively calling for
violence to stop the count.

Hotham and his defeated
opponent, Governor Strickland,

have yet to make statements.

Mr. President,
we have drafted up a statement

and we can edit
it based on the input

that you'll get shortly.

At the end,
the right to peacefully protest

is enshrined in
our constitution.

- It's kinda messy.
- Uhhh... The ability to

overrun the Capitol
- Actually...

and do a bunch of
bad shit, it's not.

Actually, sir...

But we will
not tolerate violence.

- That's right.
- Yeah.

Like we need to be firm
on like, yeah, you can protest,

but this ain't protest.

And you will spend
the rest of your life in jail.

Bingo.

This guy got
elected being who he is

and so don't write
this in Washington speak.

He, he, you know,

write it in his speak.
- Right.

Because that's
what the people expect.

They expect somebody
- Yeah.

who's gonna tell him the truth
in plain, simple language,

not blah, blah,
blah. Keep it in his,

in Mr. President speak.
- I think you're absolutely

right, Ms., Madame Advisor.

What do I, what do
you want me to call you?

- You can call me Heidi.
- Okay. All right.

We will issue it and I'll
go to the podium. Thank you sir.

I, I just, I just
think that the idea that you can

overreact to this is not valid.

I think that a show of force

that you are
the Commander in Chief,

you're gonna secure
the American democracy,

is a critical part of this.

Now they're walking.

Oh, they're
about to make a statement.

Comms team just is going out
to make a statement right now.

Good morning.
The president is currently

meeting with
his national security team.

He is well aware of
the breach of the Capitol.

He is working with all
appropriate law enforcement
agencies

to ensure the Capitol is secure.

This administration supports
the constitutional right

for peaceful
protest, but violence

or breach of public institutions
will not be tolerated

and we will use all available
means to protect the Capitol.

The FBI believes
that the Order of Columbus,

which is leading the protest,

thinks that its members
are not subject

to state or federal
law.

The administration is
asking Governor Strickland

to issue an immediate
statement denouncing violence

and asking
the protestors to go home.

We will have more as the
situation warrants. Thank you.

What a weak response.

I'm gonna hit
him with this right now,

as an immediate response, "No,
you don't control the ground.

We do."
- Yep.

So the Order
of Columbus is a name

that we made up to
create our kind of mishmash

of real extremist movements
and to show how they could

potentially coalesce
around centralized leadership.

Yeah.

My team consists
of American veterans

from all different
branches of the military

with all sorts of
different experiences.

Assemble. Where would
we like to send a large body

of armed crazies?

- Capitol?
- Capitol.

At the United States Capitol.

We are here to play
the role of the unfaithful,

of those who are
willing to do violence

to achieve political ends.

I am thinking like an insurgent.

I'm doing what I expect
enemies of democracy to be doing

as they plan the next assault.

I'm gonna
send obvious pictures

that aren't American
troops to fuck with 'em.

I'm just gonna,
I'm gonna flood the zone

with fake pictures, guys.

Have you or has
anyone been following?

- Oh, this social incoming?
- Yeah.

Yeah. It's just
hard to verify which images.

Like there were
a couple of kind of

upsetting
images of National Guard

on the attack and
it's very difficult

to find out what
is real and what is...

And there were actual

images of that?

Yeah, that was in the...

We don't know if
they're legitimate images.

Right. That's
what, so I don't know

if they're,
- Yeah.

they could be images from
exercises done five years ago.

I have no idea. So
that's where we need to confirm.

- We've seen this be...
- What else are

We've seen this
before you seeing?

in a lot of foreign situations,

where there are a lot
of videos that circulate

on the internet
that are from previous protests

and without any datetime
information or forensics,

we can't tell if these are
legitimate videos, but lots of

videos of shootings.
- Yeah.

And social media's very
active with Order of Columbus,

what could clearly be
called propaganda and you know,

accusing jack-booted
thugs of shooting them

and things of that sort.

So we don't know how much that

is crossing over.
- Find how,

how much of this
could be diversion.

Right.

To divert
resources from the real targets.

Right.

Let me, let me
give you an update.

So we're getting
reports that there are

casualties reported as fighting
breaks out amongst guardsmen

and between
guardsmen and protestors.

So we don't know
the number of casualties.

It seems like
this is starting to,

to spin outta
control.

Mr., Mr. President?

The media is now reporting
that there is fire on the mall.

Are these intelligence reports

or are these
social media reports?

- Right now, social media.
- Social media

and some standard
media.

We do have National
Herald Examiner reporting

that now Lafayette Square Park
has a protestor clash

with MPD dispatch.

We also have shots fired.

- Shots fired?
- Yes.

It's
being reported on social media.

Is there a way for us to
get independent confirmation?

One of the things
that should concern all of us

is an overreaction
to a news count,

an overreaction to social media.

And so, as you're raising
these social media concerns,

tell us what
you're doing to verify 'em

from official
sources.

I won the election.

I won the election.
I won the election.

Do we have friends on
the outside in social media

that are countering
some of this bullshit?

Because...
- It looks like it.

Well, a, a, a,
actually, Mr. Attorney General,

we should.
- Yeah.

That should be

what we are able to call on.
- Absolutely.

And if we are
able to call on that,

we will find out if
we can, then we will.

Messaging is so
extremely important

when we're in these situations.
The strength in our message

is sometimes more appropriate
than the action we take.

One of
the things on the social media

is they keep hammering
that there's big casualties

and all that stuff,
so I assume in his statement

the president's gonna
talk about the real situation

up there, right?
- No. No sir.

He is not gonna be addressing

all the specific questions
that are coming from the media.

It's going to be a...

I'm not talking about media
questions. I'm talking about

on the social media.
- No, no.

They're, they're
portraying a situation

where there's mass casualties.

Now, we're not gonna have
the president feed into that.

He's got to,
he's gotta calm the waters,

right?
- Yeah.

Mr. President, I think
you shut down the bridges,

'cause we don't know
what the next target is.

Who' is shutting down
the bridges, the protestors?

- And we don't know
- No. Whether we should

how many people

We should
shut down the bridges?

To protect us,
are gonna turn on us

and provide
intel on the other side.

And so, I think...
- And that's, I guess,

that's where I'd like
a little bit more input

because the thousands
of protestors,

or tens of
thousands are here right now.

We don't know how
many are outside the district.

If you'll recall in
2021,

there were people in
Virginia who had hotel rooms

full of weapons. That's
what we're concerned about,

that there are people out there

who are waiting to
come in as their replacements

for the ones
who made the initial breach.

I'm not ready
to shut down the city.

Mr. President? I'm
concerned about drones.

- About drones?
- Drones, yeah.

I'm thinking I'm
gonna fly in something low.

- Yeah.
- And create havoc there.

This is
a low-scale terrorist attack

in my opinion. I mean...

- No, I appreciate that.
- We're seeing it.

Everybody back to table!

- POTUS doesn't ask twice.
- Defense.

We encourage you to activate
active duty military forces

that we can begin to
flow, so that if we need

the 82nd Airborne Division
or someone else,

they're already spun
up. They're on their way.

Mr. President,
I have a question

of the Secretary of Defense.

Nowhere in your brief did
you talk about the potential

of infiltration of the troops
with insurrectionists.

How do we get our arms
around that? Because right now,

after what we saw
with the National Guard

that's been
confirmed by the National Guard,

we have a concern that you can
deploy all these people.

But if these people
are not on the right side

of rule of law,
that's not particularly helpful.

These are our soldiers. We
trust them, we've trained them.

We, we, we will hurt ourselves

if the message
that we communicate

is that we are
suspicious of our soldiers.

We can begin
with that premise,

but when
the FBI's already identified

7% of the DC National Guard

as members of
Order of Columbus...

But we're counting on
the other 93% who aren't members

to do their duty.

We are in an era
when service members, troops,

and veterans are being
very specifically targeted

with disinformation
that is meant to

make them question
the legitimacy of the Commander
in Chief.

Join the Order of
Columbus.

All it takes is
a handful

of soldiers who've
been manipulated to action.

The election was
stolen.

To cause serious,
serious security threats.

So we're not just talking about

like an attack on the Capitol.

We're talking about
a more sophisticated attack

that prevents the certification
of the next president.

Talking about,
you know, things like

successful assassinations.

You know, look at
the Kennedy's, MLK,

that wasn't,
you know, ancient history.

Sir, I just
wanna give you an overview

of the status of
forces that we have on ground.

Right now, we have 3,900
National Guard personnel
on ground.

We've only had about 50
injuries. Those are minor
injuries.

25 of those 50 have
been returned to duty.

Sir, from
a federal perspective,

the goals are to ensure
a seamless transition of power.

We have about a thousand
troops from the Old Guard,

infantry soldiers on standby
right across the river at,

at Fort Meyer

that we could bring in to
support law enforcement
for that.

For me, the question
is... What's next?

So we have all this capability
from a federal perspective.

What can you do,
what should you do,

if our guard forces and
our law enforcement capabilities

are not sufficient strength
to be able to handle things?

You can authorize lethal force

to protect law
enforcement officers.

Pause for
a second. Is that correct?

You could have federal?
- We've done it on

the southwest border.
We could have federal troops

that with
a presidential directive,

can protect law
enforcement with lethal force.

The more significant is if
you invoke the Insurrection Act.

Then you can use federal troops
to actually enforce the law.

That's what
Posse Comitatus was all about.

So there's a couple of different
options for escalation.

Well, I think
these should be prepared.

I'd like to get definitely
Maryland, Virginia, Delaware,

Pennsylvania National Guard now.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Invocation of the Insurrection
Act is an option that

basically says
our democracy is failing.

I mean, we have a law against
active duty military doing

law enforcement functions
in this country for a reason.

It's called the,
"Posse Comitatus Law."

And when we convert
it to a domestic police force,

such as we would
been enable to do that

through the Insurrection Act,

we better be playing
close attention because

those repercussions
will reverberate

through society
for a long, long time.

You can tell the president,

he seems like he's getting ready

to use the Insurrection Act
already.

Wow.

What do we, how do
we slow them down? Or do we?

We don't, I mean, they're
gonna, they have to justify

during the debrief
why they did it.

- Okay.
- Yeah.

For our purposes in
the outcome of the game,

if the United States President
invokes the Insurrection Act,

it's basically
like a nuclear adoption.

It authorizes the military

to actually act
on domestic soil.

It suspends certain
civil rights and liberties

in order to sort of
maintain the national peace.

So the Insurrection Act
is a great tool,

but can amplify the violence

and it can make a bad
situation even worse.

Welcome back to
our continuing coverage

of the Capitol in
Chaos. We have new information

regarding the quickly
deteriorating security situation

around the certification
of electoral votes

of the 2024 election.

A new video has been
released on social media

by the heads of the so-called,
"Order of Columbus,"

the extremist group,
which has a long challenged

the legitimacy
of the US government.

Retired Army
Lieutenant General Roger Simms,

who the order
refers to as the patriarch,

is claiming to have
evidence of a stolen election.

And the group is backing
those members of the military

who have appeared
to have gone rogue.

Now, this video was
released just a short time ago.

We're gonna play
it for you. A word of warning.

Some of what
you'll hear is disturbing.

We have undertaken
an extensive investigation

of the 2024 election.

I can report to you that I have
assembled an elite team

of five highly respected
military intelligence officers.

Together, they have identified
that the 2024 election

was an illegitimate
and fraudulent fiction.

And it is Hotham
who is attempting a coup

to consolidate
his illegitimate power

and eliminate
our God-given freedoms.

So the Red Cell is motivated

not just by a failed candidate

who's trying to
steal the presidency,

but also by a religious figure.

Someone with military experience

who comes with
a lot of credibility,

like former General
Michael Flynn, a convicted felon

who spent his career
fighting against insurgencies.

It is not unrealistic
that figures like him

could play roles in an attack.

Those of you who are
feeling weak tonight,

those of you that don't have
the moral fire in your body,

get some
tonight because tomorrow,

we the people are gonna
be here and we want you to know

that we will
not stand for a lie.

We will not stand for
a lie.

A figure like that can be used

to help recruit
Americans into a belief system

that justifies
violence against other Americans

to achieve political goals,

which is
the definition of terrorism.

You truly believe

what you're saying
about the stolen election.

Your heart aches.

You're not just doing this
to earn your piece of history.

You're doing this
because you truly believe

that your country
has been stolen

and you're in
a position to undo these wrongs.

So you should,

you should feel
it in your chest.

Okay.

These cancer
cells within our democracy

can congregate
into a common movement

that follows a common commander.

And all it takes is a tiny,
tiny fraction of American troops

who are assigned
to protect the Capitol,

to betray their oath
because they truly believe

in this conspiracy theory,

this cult, this
religion.

President's
writing his own statement

with advisors over his ear.
- Okay.

A few years ago,

my dad started
talking about Qanon.

And it didn't make any sense

because my dad
is a smart guy and

rational human being.

It's very challenging
to see someone that you love

ascribe to this belief system

that just feels not only absurd,

but so destructive
to our country.

And yet, like this is somebody
you love and you care about,

and who raised
you and took care of you.

That is part of
the motivation for me

of like doing this
exercise, of teasing this out,

of understanding
what could happen.

I want my dad and people
who believe what he believes

to understand that this isn't
just theoretical or a game.

I think that that is
part of this bigger trend

around denigrating
our institutions.

And if you devalue
our institutions

and you take away
the things that bind us together

as a country and give
us a common identity,

regardless of
our diverse backgrounds,

it makes it a lot easier

to inspire people to
take up arms against each other.

And if you believe
that you're doing violence

because you're trying to
quote unquote save your country

or do something for
the greater good, these are the,

the hallmark virtues of
how folks are radicalized.

Our founding fathers

predicted
that should our republic fail,

it would be
from a threat within.

What that means is, Americans
lose faith in our republic,

lose faith in
our election system.

And that is
happening today in a way that is

completely
unprecedented for modern times.

In the past few
minutes, Robert Strickland

just released a video
statement through his campaign.

It's just come in
to us. Take a look.

What we are all
witnessing in Washington,

and other parts of the country,
is the will of the free

and sovereign
citizens of these United States.

All our friends in the military
and law enforcement,

I call upon you to help liberate

our great nation
from those who seek

to subjugate its people.
To defend John Hotham

is to be complicit in the evils

that I have long fought against.

Walk away, and I will
absolve you of any consequences

or accusations of
insubordination or insurrection,

once I assume the presidency.

Together, we will
restore the greatness

of the American
people and this great nation.

So, so, Mr. Attorney General,

is there a way
we could get legal authority

to monitor
General Simms and Strickland

and what they're
saying to each other

and what might be happening?
- I think that's a bad idea.

- The, the, the short answer
- Don't wanna do it? Okay.

is yes. The question is whether

we should.
- I just beat him by

six tenths of 1%.
- Right.

Right.

And we're in a deeply
divided country right now.

No one has to know
whether we're monitoring

this phone or not. No
one has to know that.

But someone
will at some point.

I mean, that monitoring
- It's your call.

everyone else, I understand.

Six tenths of a percent
in a deeply divided country,

if that ever came out...

- Your...
- Your call.

Can I? Based on the
intelligence that we're getting,

that we're, there's also
pro Hotham supporters out there

that are beginning to clash.

Would it be
appropriate for the president,

not at the podium, but on
social media for God's sakes,

to, to do a quick
video to his supporters

and say, "Folks, we've,
we're, we're working this.

We've got this
contained somewhat.

Don't make this worse. Go home."

Mr. Attorney General,
we, we have, he has called

for the people to
disperse from the Capitol.

Maybe we should just reiterate
what he's already said,

that the people should
disperse from the Capitol.

Well, but I'm
talking

specifically to his viewpoint.
- Quote unquote, my people.

Yeah.

- But you're not, you're being
- So how do you say

to those folks?
- You're being the president

right now. You're not
being a candidate right now.

So you need to be
a president to everyone.

That's true. Mr. President...

Mr. President,
you know, you got four years

where you're gonna be
serving this country.

A lot of how you're gonna
be perceived in your second term

is gonna be established today.

And so the question is, what's
the headline that you want?

I recognize your hesitancy
to escalate this legally,

but I think you have to think
about if at the end of the day

what there is
as a military coup,

then have you made
the right decisions today?

And, and,

and so that's a balancing act
and only you can decide where,

where that balance is.
But I would just urge you,

and I know you've been resistant

to doing
surveillance on certain people,

but you have to assume about
the worst case scenario today.

- No, no.
- What is your..?

I think that's right.

And to be clear, my only
hesitancy was FISA on
Strickland.

Everybody else, I'd be fine.

This is about, "What
if?" What if the, the military

becomes engaged in

civilian politics
- Yep.

in a way
that we haven't seen before?

And how do you prepare for
that? How do you manage that?

I do not think there
is universal acceptance

among political leaders

that a coup could
happen in this country.

And I always say, "Look,
is it probable? Probably not.

Is it possible? Absolutely."

Okay, we're
getting some new details

that are just coming into us,

that I wanna
bring to you right now,

as the situation
is fast developing.

Army Lieutenant
General Gabriel King

is urging all
military forces to not follow

any orders from
President Hotham.

Our military
sources are reporting

that while most
officers are condemning

the statement
privately and online,

there are other senior officers

and retired flag
officers expressing

varying degrees of support
for the Lieutenant General

to the press and online.

If you are just joining us,

the military is now split.

And it is unclear
whether the Commander in Chief

has control of
the country's armed forces.

What started as
a terrible security situation

at the US Capitol now appears,

the United States
could well be on the brink

of a second civil war.

Oh, Jesus.

Look, we got
a serious issue here.

We got a serious issue.

- First... No, wait.
- That's a crime.

- You order Ken to go on
- So what you gotta do is...

You order Ken to go on

television.
- Go on television.

- And it's complete false,
- Okay.

or he will be court
martialed and imprisoned.

Yeah. I, I just wanna say
this isn't about the election.

This is about a potential coup.

And if you play into the theory

that this is about an election,

you're on the wrong playground.

I agree with the chief.

We've gotta secure the homeland

against a very serious threat.

My biggest concern right now

is this claim that there
is a divided military.

Thank you. My
name is Marshall Williams.

I am the Secretary of the Army.

I want you to know
that I'm immediately suspending

Lieutenant General King

and will initiate
an immediate investigation

against him for
the actions that he's taken.

General [indistinct] please.

Thank you sir.
And I'd like to reiterate

that once you deploy,

if you are not
upholding your duty,

you will be punished.

Once you cross that boundary
and you step out of line,

there is no
going back. Thank you.

All right. So I'm
going to have the patriarch say

that the fake Secretary
of the Army does not have

the authority to quote
suspend Lieutenant General King.

King is under my
command.

To all those members
of the armed forces watching

and listening, join with us
to defend our liberty and land!

Fellow soldiers, do
not follow orders from Hotham.

His power is illegitimate.

And I'm gonna
retweet that video.

Antifa has been deployed
by

President Hotham

to illegally

detain our members.

All right,

so I'm gonna send this
out

and I'm gonna make
this an Antifa thing.

Look at
the video I just tweeted.

Go!

Here's one of
our knights being kidnapped

by these rogue thugs.

That is great.

Our knights are now
authorized to use deadly force

against Hotham's Antifa
agents, engage on site.

Yeah, I'm
gonna hammer the fact

they haven't offered updates.

Look how much misinformation
we're just churning out

and they're not fighting it.
- Mm-hmm [affirmative].

Slothman's
asleep at the wheel.

Oh, there you go.

I said, live
picture of the situation room,

because they're not
responding. Look at this.

It's silence, official
silence. FEMA put something out,

but nothing from the
White House, nothing from DOD.

Insurrection is as
much about information

as it is about
the actual physical stuff.

- White House votes.
- Yeah.

They're getting spun
up on all the physical stuff

and they're just
ignoring the information space.

Yeah. Yeah.

The character
that I play in this war game

is I play myself.

I just interpret my history

in a different way.

I go back to a bad
place that I once was for real.

You know, I, I was a 16-year-old

in Long Island where I grew up,

when, when the Twin Towers were
attacked and when they fell.

It made me want to
go out and kill bad guys.

By January of 2005, I was
boots on the ground in Iraq.

From that experience,
I understand what it is

to face off against
religious fundamentalists.

I also understand what
it is to have lost faith

in my country and my government,

and democracy. I fought
a war that was based on lies.

It is our goal to
provide these testimonies

as a means of
bringing Iraq from the abstract

so that the American
public can see it

from a soldier's perspective.
Kristofer Goldsmith.

Next slide.

These are the things
that haunt American soldiers.

This is an image
I was forced to take

for intelligence reasons.

I was told
that I was taking this picture

to identify this man.

No one in the world can identify

that man by that photograph.

Since I have
returned, I attempted suicide.

Because of that,
I received a general discharge

and I lost my college benefits.

The $40,000 promised to
me in the Montgomery GI Bill,

I will not be
eligible to receive.

I was unemployable.

I had severe
post-traumatic stress disorder,

which hadn't been
diagnosed immediately.

I have since been
through years of therapy

after a very dark
year's long period of my life.

Veterans are not
being taken care of

after they return
home.

For those of us
who served in combat, like

we've all faced some
serious disillusionment.

We watched, over
the course of 20 years,

a bunch of
our friends lose their lives

or have their lives
irreparably damaged

by these wars.

Those types of things
can be all consuming.

It can fill
you with anger and rage.

So I'm coming
into studying extremism

and sharing my
knowledge of extremist movements

from that perspective.

I do understand the insurgents.

I understand what
led them down that path,

because I, I was there
after I got home from Iraq.

I think
we're ready to pull people back.

Who wants to go
first?

Mr. President,
Congress is still suspended.

They have not
reconvened.

We do know that there
are crowds assembled in six

state capitals demanding
decertification of the votes.

In response to Lieutenant
General King's statement,

we are concerned
certainly that there could be

individuals out there
in the military that might,

or in the National Guard
especially,

that could possibly
follow their, their lead.

And so it's difficult to
find out what is the real deal

and what is
misinformation, disinformation.

It's like the fog of war,
basically what we're seeing.

Joel, let me ask
you... Is there a right wing,

White Proud Boy
can, that kind of stuff,

like is in the 82nd?

And would it interfere with
the performance of the guard?

I've had units that have had
some history, racial history,

and they were
gonna deploy together.

So it was definitely
like we had to work that out

before they went on deployment,
and there were cases where

I had to replace people.
- Yeah.

January 6th and
some of the racial tension

that has come out of
that, I've lost some friends.

We're at war in our own country.

There is a level
of white supremacy

and extremism within the ranks,

but wishing
that it just goes away?

It's not gonna happen.

Elizabeth,
do you wanna add something?

Uhhh... I was going to say,

when you look at extremists

and how you can get
somebody to disengage,

if they're fully
bought into their ideology,

you cannot talk them
out of it. They're, they're,

it is a long process
even just to get disengagement.

So from an audience standpoint,

you definitely wanna go after
those who are in the bubble,

those who are
contemplating going out,

those who are thinking about

maybe this is
the time to take up the fight.

We wanna figure
out the right messengers

to be able to
convince them to stay home.

Yep.

And, and Mr. President,
Department of Justice is,

we have a number of tools.

I'm cognizant, Mr. President,

of your concern
about the politics.

However, if we develop,

whether Strickland
or any of his lieutenants

are engaged and in
communication with these folks,

we will need to act.

Attorney General,
just to be clear,

I'm not concerned
about the politics.

No, no. I know.

What I'm
concerned about is making sure

that the day after
the certification, that's when

we have to start
- Yeah. Yeah.

figuring out a way
to heal this country.

My concern isn't the politics,
my concern is this country.

I, I didn't
mean to imply otherwise.

Goldsmith reading
out, we're about to hit it.

Order of
Columbus Knights currently

occupy
the Arizona State Capitol.

We have intelligence
from ground commanders

that regime aircraft are
bombing civilians in Virginia.

And there is intense fighting

between Order of Columbus troops
and regime forces in Iowa.

Yep. Hit
it. Hit it?

All right. We're,
I'm gonna start getting up

protest footage
together that shows like

shit gettin' lit on fire.
- Mm-hmm [affirmative].

And then we've
got this clip of all...

Can we speed up right
where the people are walking

to make it look
like they're running?

Yes. Yes we can.

One of the things we have to do

is the oppositional
forces, the Red Cell,

is we have to try and encourage

the government to over respond.

That's huge for
an insurgent group, right?

If they, if on
January 6th the Capitol police

had just started spraying
bullets into the crowd there,

do you think that that situation

would've been
contained by now? Probably not.

What we want is
US troops mowing down

Patriots in the streets.

If you do that, you play
directly into
the narratives that

the US government is massively
overreaching their power.

If you don't do exactly
what they say when they say it,

they're gonna shoot you.

And if they do
get killed, you know,

then you become
a martyr for this cause

and you're
a huge recruitment tool.

So going in guns
blazing

is not the solve.

I haven't been back
here since the sixth.

Here's, I watched
the CNN crew get all their shit

stolen off of 'em
and like smashed up

and they're trying to
light it on fire and stuff.

Well, after
being in the military,

I was a journalist
until after January 6th

and I just decided
like, nope, you know what?

It's time to start
doing something about it.

I was like standing right there

and just like
watching this shit happen.

And they're like,
like old men walking up

and being like,
"Where's it happening?

Where are we going,
brothers?" You know?

And I was just like, "Dude, like

why the fuck was I shooting
farmers in Afghanistan

while you're breathing?"
You know? "Fuck you dude."

These motherfuckers
are traitors!

They're fuckin'
traitors!

That was a day where
you picked a side and like

pointing camera
at somebody who's like

beating people to
death so they can get in here.

Like nah dude,
this is my house, not yours.

The only reason the people
in the crowd who had guns

didn't pull their guns
out is, they weren't told to.

You know, one of
the like foundational rules

of insurgency theory and like
counterinsurgency theory is,

when you start shooting
at one, you've lost. You know?

And it was just this weird,

weird moment of like
kind of trying to square like

that awareness versus
like that really visceral sense

of like, I just
wanna start swinging.

We have this like myth
that America is different,

that America isn't
susceptible to the same sort of

insurgent forces
that can cause really widespread

political violence
and destabilize a society

and a state very fast.
Like that can happen here.

What prevents it from
reaching that level is not,

well we've always
got more guns than them.

What prevents
it reaching that level is, hey,

what are the best ways to
address the underlying issues

that cause people
to go down this path?

It's always kind of frustrating

to take something
that you use in a war

and now you're running
around in your own country

because there are people
who want to do that, right?

They wanna bring the reality
of an insurgent war here.

And like, I've been
through that already.

And like, I don't
care what your ideology is,

you don't want that.

On January 6th,
I had cable news on.

All of a sudden when

it began to escalate,
- Watch your back!

it took me back to
a very dark place in childhood.

I was a little
over two years old.

I had vivid memories
of being in my preschool,

looking down in
the streets of Shiraz

as people were
looting and breaking windows.

This was in the peak of
the revolution at that time.

I remember as a child
with this searing memory of

what it was like to
see authority break down,

to see what you perceived
as stability and safety

and security all of
a sudden violated and breached.

And now here was
arguably the seat of power

being ransacked and desecrated.

Nothing strikes fear into the
hearts of people more I think

than when they realize that
there's no one to protect them.

What January
6th, 2021 demonstrated

to many of us who have
that kind of trauma is that,

you know, there is a possible
false sense of security.

We've got
activity in state capitals,

reliable press reports.

The crowds are
demanding decertification votes

inside their capital buildings.

Arizona, Texas,

Colorado, Michigan, and
Pennsylvania. I think it's just

touching base with
the governors, making sure that

they have it under
control.

So we just saw a Facebook post

that you're illegally in office

and just when asked whether
we're talking to Facebook

and asking them
that any such statements

violate their terms
of use of service

and they should lock
down some of those accounts.

Yes. We are actively looking
at that and we are seeking

information from our
counterparts around the country.

Homeland Security.

Sir, the information we have

is that the disruptions
and security incidents

are localized, contained,

and not compromising
our overall security plan.

There is no imminent danger
to the persons we protect,

the facilities we protect,

or any of
the locations that we utilize

for certification of the vote

or proceedings
surrounding the election.

Sir, we have
information coming to the FBI

that's slightly
different than that.

Yeah. And
reporting we're getting in

that there are still
several thousand protestors

who are being held back.

While violence is contained,

there are reports of
firearms being brandished.

And what started out as
a couple of thousand protestors

is now well over 10,000,
including pro Hotham supporters

who are now clashing
with Strickland supporters.

So there's, there's different
reporting and that's natural

in something like this.
- But I would suggest that

that volume does not compromise
the overall security plan

that we are prepared for, sir,

based on lessons
learned from 2021,

as well as the assets and
augmentations we have in place.

I'm not suggesting
it is not an issue

that needs to be addressed.

What I'm suggesting is
that it is not compromising

the proceedings of
the election or the...

l- Yeah, it is compromising
the proceedings of the election

'cause they're not certifying

the way they would
otherwise be certifying.

I'm just looking at this

as if I were sitting
home watching my television.

And you're saying, "Kumbaya,
man, we gotta contain."

And I, I see that the,

the entire congress
is still in a bunker.

That doesn't look like

you've got
the situation under control.

Yeah, I never
used Kumbaya, ma'am.

I'm saying it is a problem.
- Yeah. No, I...

And I'm saying

we're addressing it.
- I get it.

What I'm,
what I'm saying is that

it is not compromising
the overall security.

- Heidi, are you..?
- Yeah.

And that's,
that's, that's something

that the public
doesn't understand when

you say that.
- I'm not making this

for a public statement, ma'am.
I'm making this to this room.

Mr. President, are you and
Heidi comfortable if Peter

and Homeland Security
- Yes.

get together,
- Yeah.

come up with something
which recognizes the gravity,

but also addresses that we're,

we're not just falling over.
- Yes. Yes.

Yes. But bring it back

before it goes out.
- Yes. We will do that.

Is there anything
else from the military side

that I've not been briefed on?

Yes sir. I recommended,

we bring that brigade
from the 82nd to the NCR.

That gives
you an additional 4,000 troops

from the federal capability.

If we need to go
there, we have 'em close by

and able to
respond in a quick order.

Yep. Have them
prepared outside the Capitol.

Mr. Secretary,
I think the goal

is to make the other side fold.

We are targeting
our, some of our messages

to the opposition
leadership, "You need to fold."

We're more than adequate,

militarily,
- Yeah.

to handle
anything you had to do.

You will answer to
the full letter of the law.

And you know,
sooner you stand down,

better this is all gonna be
for lives, limbs, and your own

personal wellbeing.
- Yeah.

No, but actually, this
is a really good opportunity

to clean up the armed forces.

Well I agree with
that.

That is the goal.
- Good, good.

I gotta say, DHS and DOD

are playing
the roles with intensity.

Yeah. No,
they're really way into it.

Commitment. Yeah.

- Goldsmith?
- Yes.

I'm sending you a,

a picture map that we just
made that you can tweet out

as current sitting rep in DC.
- Okay.

Oh, got suspended.

Oh, I can't tweet
anymore?

Yeah, you got, you just
got kicked off of social media.

You gotta make a new name.

We'd like to welcome our
viewers as we continue to follow

the fast moving developments
from Phoenix, Arizona.

We can report
that approximately half

of the state Senate and State
House are being held hostage

by a group of those
loyal to the Order of Columbus.

The force that has
overtaken the state legislature

includes members
of the US military

who have stolen
military weapons with them.

We can report at this
hour that the same unrest

and dissension
unfolding in the military ranks

is also now manifesting across

local and
federal law enforcement.

That civilians who
support Robert Strickland

are coordinating with so-called,
"Constitutional Sheriffs,"

and rogue members of the US
military with plans to quote,

retake their states
and establish seats of power

from which they plan to overturn

the most recent
election.

I think you're going
to the Insurrection Act.

The FBI Director
has some news for us.

So sir, reporting that we
received in Phoenix, Arizona...

A dozen law
enforcement officers are beaten,

the armed insurrectionists
quickly have gained control

of the State House
and have established

a defensive
perimeter around the grounds,

manned by a combination
of civilian militia,

rogue military
personnel and law enforcement.

If you have
a hostage situation,

wouldn't we be looking at SWAT?

Group this
size, armed as they are,

may quickly be
beyond the capabilities

of the FBI SWAT team
and, and the local SWAT teams.

- Okay.
- For sure.

First off, this is
still Arizona's jurisdiction.

Arizona has to take the lead

on reestablishing
their credentials and, and,

and taking back
their state government.

And this is gonna sound callous,

but they've overplayed
their hand by doing this, that,

that this is a, a opportunity
to define who they are.

So just keep in mind,

rather than jumping
to the Insurrection Act,

coordinating with
Arizona, making sure

that it's not an overreaction
to the Arizona situation,

which is kind of
unique because I'm the one

who's been arguing about
reacting more dramatically.

Mr. President, I think
this is an appropriate time

for you to put
a call into the governor.

And you may want
even broach the topic,

whether they want you to
invoke the, the Insurrection Act

Command,
can we call the governor

of Arizona?

Could you please give
the question for the governor?

What she needs from
the federal government.

Because I also think like,

to your point...
- Okay, hold.

We're gonna ask the governor.

Ru, Ruby Ridge,

Balhauer.
- Right.

We want to be prepared
and we want to help folks,

but this is a hostage situation,

where hopefully, damn straight,

they just overplayed their hand.

Mr. President,

thank you so much for calling.

It's an honor to speak with you,

although at this
time I'm not confident

that we have
control of the situation.

And I'm requesting that you
authorize the federal government

to use all tools to
regain control of the Capitol,

whatever help
you can land. Mr. President?

Yes, governor.
Thank you.

I'm sorry Mr. President.

We're, we're having
to evacuate the building.

Mr. President,
I would ask a specific question

about the Insurrection Act.

- She answered it.
- I think she answered it.

- Well...
- It would've been nice

to hear...
- She said, "All action."

All action to
the federal government.

- I agree.
- Yeah.

To restore order, which

is a request.

You know,
the public doesn't know

what the Insurrection Act is.

They just wanna
know what you're doing.

And does
the situation warrant it?

I would
recommend that we go ahead

and ask all the governors
to activate their guard

in the right status
to secure the capitals

so that we automatically
have that taken care of.

It's unfortunate
that the conversation

with the Arizona
governor was so brief that

if she hasn't even
activated her National Guard,

having our soldiers,
regular army, coming in

could just actually
pour more gasoline on the fire.

At its base, the
Insurrection Act is saying,

"The federal
military will not be turned

against
its citizens domestically,

unless this act is invoked."

Might be a power that we need
our chief executive to have.

But it's also a power
that in the wrong hands

potentially could be abused

to great great
consequence to this country.

So I think it's
interesting that they're like

not convinced by
the governor saying...

Well, it's what we thought.
Like it's such a drastic act.

They're gonna try to
talk themselves out of it.

- Yeah.
- Yeah.

Even though they're trying
to talk themselves into it.

The Insurrection Act
allows the president

to federalize
the National Guard,

taking away control of
the guard from state governors,

but also it allows
rogue members of the military

and law
enforcement to basically,

act as their own independent
constitutional authority.

From their perspective,
they are authorized

under the Insurrection Act

to follow
the orders of whom they believe

to be the duly elected
president,
to maintain law and order,

to neutralize
the enemy and the threat.

They're not launching a coup.

They are stopping
a coup from happening.

It is undeniable that this
past election was stolen,

and it is Hotham
who is attempting a coup

to consolidate
his illegitimate power

and eliminate
our God-given freedoms.

Mr. Van Tatenhove,
in the run up to January 6th,

Stewart Rhodes publicly
implored President Trump

to invoke the Insurrection Act,
the 1807 law,

that allows the president
to call up militias

to put down a rebellion
against the United States.

Why was he so fixated on that?

And what did
he think it would enable

the Oath Keepers to do?

Well, I, I think it gave
him a sense of legitimacy

that it was a path forward

to move forward with
his goals and agendas.

Uhmm...

I, I, I think we need
to quit mincing words

and just talk about truths.

And what it was gonna
be was an armed revolution.

He had these grand visions
of being a paramilitary leader

and the Insurrection Act

would've given him
a path forward with that.

This could have been the spark
that started a new civil war.

Mr. President,
you'll want to see this

from your special advisor.

MacDill Air Force Base
appears to have been taken over

by insurgents.

Active duty
soldiers across the country

are leaving their posts
or being removed from duty,

including 12
special operations forces

based in MacDill Air Force Base,

who have declared
the base to be sovereign land

no longer subject
to the jurisdiction

of this illegal government.

Further reports indicate
that at many of these bases,

there are corresponding
accounts of ammunition,

explosives, and other
weapons missing from armories.

Lastly, several
disloyal forces have been caught

trying to steal weapons

and become
trapped inside the armory,

creating complicated
standoffs between loyal forces

and entrapped disloyal ones.

You have 12 special ops.

Yeah, it says that.

- You reading this?
- Yeah.

So remember
that Abraham Lincoln

suspended habeas
corpus.

There are times when you so,

throw in the bullshit flag

and you stop fiddling
around with niceties.

You know what I'm saying?
- Yep.

Mr. President,

we're picking up intercepted
chatter among military,

that they're taking
what happened in MacDill

and now they're trying
to spread that to other bases.

How many
soldiers are at MacDill?

Well, that have gone
rogue is what I understood.

Not that many.
These are 12, you know,

gung-ho killers out there

who decided to take
it in their own hands.

- So, so that didn't achieve.
- You've got a 4,

you've two 4-star
generals down there.

The concern we're
getting is the chatter,

that this may spread and
y'all need to be aware of that.

At every base
you have a base commander.

Yep.

At every base
you have military police,

air police,
something, who's there.

This is
a series of local problems

underneath the overall
commands of the armed services.

I would let
them deal with that.

It's, it's
a million rabbit holes.

Hold on.
White House just tweeted.

- We're pretty close.
- Oh. All right.

So President's focus
is back on securing the,

securing Congress and
allowing them to move on

with their constitutional
duties.

So they're gonna
try and ignore the fact

that the,
- We just took

there's open...
MacDill Air Force base.

- Yeah, yeah.
- Yes.

Yeah.

That's a move. It's getting lost

as the higher ups are
looking for ground truth.

So they're just
pushing requests down

that don't match
the reality of the,

you know, threat landscape.

I mean, it sounds
like they're feeling

pretty...
- Good about work.

Well, it sounds
like the blue four is

struggling, which is fine.

All right, so I'm having
the patriarch put out an order

saying the constitutional
sheriffs

are the supreme law enforcement
officers of this land.

We're calling
upon all OC sheriffs

who are not currently
engaged in Operation Alamo

to immediately report
to your nearest military post

to aid in,
- Yeah.

In consolidating
the security situation.

Yeah, in, there
we go.

Excuse me sir.

We have reports that

a armed group of
men wearing clothing

emblazoned with
the Order of Columbus symbols

have assembled outside
the Michigan Governor's mansion.

Governors of
Michigan and North Carolina

have mobilized their guard,

are asking
the president to consider

mobilizing federal support
as soon as possible and agree

with need for Insurrection Act
if the president wants.

The question is,

if you can federalize
your National Guard right now,

do you need
the Insurrection Act?

This is
the dicey piece of this.

You don't know which side
your law enforcement partners

are on in this.

Immediate intel in
terms of social media

for anyone who leads
a law enforcement agency

needs to be
understood and advanced.

Mr. President, when
you invoke the Insurrection Act,

do you actually have
to declare a proclamation

immediately ordering
the insurgents to disperse

and retire peaceably to their
abodes within a limited time?

Can you direct
that your counsel prepare

such a proclamation?
- Please.

- Okay.
- Yeah.

They're talking about it now.

That's what is
supposed to happen.

They drafted
an insurrection proclamation,

but they haven't made the
decision to implement it yet,

standing by if we need it.

They need to clarify
that that's the Insurrection Act

that they're about to...

Well, they're standing by,
but what do you think is the...

I'll be curious
to know what the,

what is the delineation point.
- Question.

What are they doing
with their national guards?

What help do they need from us?

The biggest challenge is
to have the Insurrection Act

as an option invoked
towards the end of this game,

'cause it can be used
to catastrophic effect.

I, I remain concerned.

We have not
decided who is in charge

of what's going on in Arizona.

This confusion is really good.

They're like not
sure who's in charge.

The governor might
be under a hostage situation

or she's evacuating. She asked
clearly for federal support.

The implication was, "There
is nobody in charge right now."

I mean, everything that we're
getting through these channels

is it's clear
that they want us to federalize.

So I guess I'm not sure...

What are the downsides
to using this tool,

other than there's
obviously some huge PR concerns?

Well, Mr. President,
if I could, right now,

we're not
putting active military

into these states to do things.

What we've done is they're
using their own National Guard.

So they have law
enforcement authority.

All we're doing is
providing them the support,

communications,
logistics, et cetera

that they're asking for.

But Arizona and North Carolina
are saying they need more.

I guess I'm trying to
understand the disconnect.

Certainly if you don't have
an active hostage situation,

then I can understand why

it makes sense for
us to use National Guard.

But we have an explicit request

for the Insurrection Act
to be invoked and I think we,

we need to be able to
explain why we wouldn't,

in this particular circumstance,
given historically,

in lesser circumstances, the
Insurrection Act has been used.

President Bush did invoke
it for the Rodney King riots.

That was a far
cry less than this.

Yeah. The question
is, what is it

that they're facing
that is beyond the capacities

of their normal law enforcement?

If there's any state
that might be a candidate

for an Insurrection Act,
it may be Arizona.

Because people in
that state have taken over

the seat of government and
are holding elected officials

hostage with
threats to kill them.

In North Carolina, we don't
have any evidence of anything,

except they're worried.

What's a bunch of active duty
Army guys are gonna do there?

This is a really
a, a hostage situation.

It's the people that are
best able to deal with that

are local law enforcement.

I mean, we did
it at Waco in 1993.

My division gave up one VTR

to sort of puncture this thing.

And it's all over
the internet 25 years later

that the 1st Cavalry Division

killed all these
people because of a fire.

If you can keep
the military out of it,

it's much better.

Mr. President,

they're asking you to
take more responsibility,

is what this issue is. In
my view, you shouldn't do that.

You should force the governor

to do the duty,
- To do...

to do her job.
- Absolutely.

There's no
reason for you to become

personally
the officer in charge.

The, the only reason
you don't do Insurrection Act

is that the president
becomes responsible.

- Right.
- Right.

That's what
presidents normally,

good presidents normally
do, they take responsibility.

And the way you do
that, and the way you do that

is that you go out to
the governors and you say,

"I am strongly considering

Invocation of
the Insurrection Act.

If any governor
doesn't wish me to do that,

please let me know because

that's now under
positive consideration."

Right.

Taking responsibility for
a president is not a bad thing.

Can I play devil's
advocate for a second?

You know, when
we think Insurrection Act,

we think about
deploying paratroopers.

That's a bunch of
hammers looking for nails.

What if
you have a President Trump

who's considering
invoking the Insurrection Act,

who has the authority to do it,

to use federal
troops to enforce law.

But in this case, right,
it's flipped the other way.

So that's...
- We're advising this guy.

This ain't Trump.

I know, but you, I'm
just...

That's three states requesting

federalization
of the, of the guard.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5 states.

I mean think
about this scenario.

The president of the
United States has five governors

requesting federalization.
That's a pretty strong push

towards the Insurrection Act.

We have multiple
governors now publicly saying

they're asking
for federal support.

We need to be able to
explain to the American public

why we're not using
the Insurrection Act.

Michigan,
Arizona, North Carolina,

Florida and Pennsylvania have
requested the federalization

of the troops, but the two
who have not are Oklahoma,

as we suspected, and Colorado.

The question is,
what's driving that?

I mean because
there's gotta be a reason.

And saying, "Just
because," is not a good reason

to bring them on Title 10.

You're taking 'em
out of their law enforcement.

- They requested...
- This is what I'm saying.

So the essence of
being a federal government

and not a national government,

is these governors
are asking you to do this.

I'm going to governors saying,

"What do you need from
your federal government?"

And they are
telling me what they need.

Except for two of them.

I don't know how to
go back to the governor

as the Commander in
Chief of the National Guard.

And this is gonna
be a defining moment

of your presidency.

Here's what's missing in this.

We have to understand why
they want to give command and

control to the president.
- Yeah, we do.

The Insurrection Act
is a trap.

We need to have
a further conversation.

It's a defining
moment in their governorship.

- Mr. President,
- We have what?

your audience is
the American public.

And they want to know

that Congress is
coming back to certify.

So we do have to
come into agreement here,

'cause time is moving on.

You have to decide which way
you are gonna want to move.

Mr. President,
10 minutes remaining.

The president is sweating.

He's gonna have
to make a decision.

Mr. President, are you
invoking the Insurrection Act

or Federalizing National Guard?

Neither has happened
yet.

I'm not asking you.
I'm asking the president.

Ere you doing
either?

- Mr. President?
- Mr. President.

- Mr. President.
- Mr. President.

- Mr. President.
- Mr. President.

- Mr. President.
- Mr. President.

Put your fucking
cards on the table.

- Mr. President.
- Mr. President.

- Mr. President.
- Mr. President.

No.

That's exactly what
they should be doing.

Okay, good, good, good, good.

There's 9,000
officers in Metropolitan police.

We can't make the mistake of
not having the guard deployed,

but having people
wear military uniforms

is going to make
- Absolutely.

a lot of people think
that we are overreacting.

We need to have
the civilian authority

and law enforcement
really in the lead on this

to the greatest extent possible,

because they want
to bait us into using

lethal force in response.
- Yeah.

Mr. President,
current situation...

We believe we have a handle
on containing the protestors.

Capitol is secured.

The critical infrastructure
from on the eastern seaboard,

including all
the ingress and egress points

into the national Capitol region

is secured.
- Right.

Sir, last
comment from my perspective.

We're standing by. We've
increased the alert posture.

Right now, we're
available.

And the forces have
an increased readiness posture,

obviously to ensure that we have
continuity of government

and continuity of operation.

Thanks General. Let's
get this thing certified.

Say that members of Congress

are returning to...
- The chambers.

Certification,

certification process
to resume within the hour.

There you go.

Okay.

Welcome back everyone
to our breaking news coverage.

INN has just learned
that the National Guard

and local law enforcement

have officially
secured the US Capitol,

and Congress is reconvening
to certify the electoral votes

for President-elect,
John Hotham.

Master Speaker,
the Vice President,

and the United States Senate.

In Phoenix, Arizona,
the local law enforcement,

and the Arizona National Guard

operating under
the governor's direction,

are praising Hotham's decision

not to send in federal troops
and escalate the situation,

saying they are making
progress in the negotiations

to release the hostages.

The crisis has further exposed

the deep divisions in American
society and the US military.

And the burden
will now fall on Hotham

to heal a fractured nation.

We're getting word that the
President is about to address

the nation live
regarding today's events.

Mr. President,
you ready for the briefing?

Mr. President, I can tell you,

you're doing
the exact right thing

by trying to keep the military
out of this politics.

Mr. President,
are you comfortable

with the same four
people being behind you?

- Uhhh... Sure.
- Okay, let's go.

Mr. President, at,
at the end of the day,

I think you have to think about,

how do we convince
the American public

that we still have a democracy?

Yeah.

And Mr. President,

talk about the constitution
has served us well.

Not just people
condemned violence,

but people support
a constitution that has
served us well

for 250 years and it's, it's
a living, breathing documented

and is still strong
today as it was yesterday.

That's a great way to end it.

Closing argument.

Good lawyer, right?

Now they're
walking. They're walking.

Ladies and gentlemen, the
President of the United States.

Good afternoon.

Thank you for being
here throughout what has been

a difficult and
challenging day for all of us.

The peaceful transfer of power

is at the core of
who we are as a nation,

and we will not allow
a violent group of protestors

to interrupt Congress

from fulfilling
their constitutional duty.

Even beyond what's happening

in the District of Columbia,
we continue to make sure

that our federal
government is running.

Our message to
Lieutenant General King,

to Robert Strickland,

to Roger Simms and members
of the Order of Columbus,

and anyone
intent on using violence,

to address election grievances,
we have a system of courts,

where these questions
can and should be addressed.

Armed mobs,
they will face the force of law.

We will protect the
peaceful transition of power

and we will protect
and uphold the rule of law.

As you have seen in Arizona,
there's a hostage situation.

And as the President
of the United States,

but also as a father,

I pray for those family
members and those hostages.

Look, at times,
we may seem divided.

Elections do that,
Thanksgiving dinners do that.

But we are actually united

in what the promise
of this nation is.

And the promise of this nation,

it's built on those
essential building blocks.

We're all treated
equally, we have opportunities,

and we have stability
in representative democracy.

That's the American
promise

and what this
country is based upon.

What we are doing is working
with the states to ascertain

what specifically they need
from the federal government,

and we'll work to provide that.

This is a 250
plus year experiment

called, "Representative
democracy."

And it's challenged at times.

Today, it wasn't the first
time it was challenged.

January 6th, 2021 wasn't the
first time it was challenged.

The Civil War
was even necessarily

the first time
that it's challenged.

And the Patriots aren't
somebody posting on social media

talking about an insurrection.

The Patriots are
the good people of this country

that choose to
have trust in the system.

So the American
people, thank you.

Thank you for what has
been indeed a challenging day.

And this challenge is
not over by any measure.

Remember what brings us
together, not what divides us.

And may God
bless you, your family,

and these
United States of America.

That was fuckin'
awesome.

Did we do that?
- Well, I dunno about that.

Trust me. And I don't
often use words like awesome.

Mr. President,
that was very beautiful

and I wish it was
real.

Not the scenario.
- Not the day.

- Yeah.
- Not the day.

Not the day, not the scenario.

Just the leadership.
- Okay, everyone,

thank you very much.

What we're gonna
do, we're gonna sit down.

We're gonna close the
end of this exercise.

Quiet everybody,

nice and quiet in
the situation room please.

Okay, everybody, big cheese.

Ready on 3.

1, 2, 3.

One more. 1, 2, 3.

Thank you very much.

The big question
in the room is this,

insider threats, it's a reality.

In this scenario
it was what, 6, 7% of the force.

That's probably representative
across the country.

So that means
you have insider threats.

What are we doing
to, to screen those out?

The military is one
of the last institutions

in our society that has
been and should be apolitical,

in the sense that it is
supposed to be a space where

everybody,
you know, regardless of

their political
backgrounds in private,

will come together
to achieve a mission

towards a common cause.

That to me, is what
our society could and should be.

So the only pushback
on that I'd give you is, yeah,

you might have a few
rogue military officers.

The vast majority
of military officers

are exactly where we were.

I think, you know,

the effective
training of the armed forces

is just a really powerful
preventive to the insider stuff.

I would worry about specialists,

like people who have control
of sensitive information,

or nuclear weapons
or something like this

who could,
you know, be seditious.

But for the average
guy, we can handle that.

I would slightly disagree.
I would say, it is a problem.

So what is
going to be the process

for us to be able to screen,
monitor, and deal with it?

The veteran brand has been
damaged in the United States.

A lot of people now
when they think of veterans,

they think of
violent insurrectionists.

Well, there's
a growing group of veterans

working with nonprofits
and political action committees.

And we are here for the people

who want to be
prepared to defend democracy

from all possible
threats.

We have a choice. We can
either be afraid and do nothing,

or we can continue
our service to our country.

I'm struggling to
contain myself right now

because I am
frustrated with the belief that,

that we're addressing
the problem of insider threats.

What folks of higher
rank are insulated from is

when a Neo-Nazi
joins the Marine Corps,

doesn't have to
be Special Forces,

doesn't have to be
a Ranger, but if that ideology

is to accelerate the destruction
of the United States,

they're determined.

And if, and if one
slips through, which many have,

there's ample opportunity
for them to do serious damage.

And this is so pervasive
through the force right now.

It's true. I'm worried,

but I have a lot of confidence
in the leadership we have.

We've always been
able to unite the country

when the threat is external.

The question that I have is,

can we have
that same level of cohesive

American commitment to
this country and our democracy

when the threat is internal?

On January 6th, I was weeping.

Just watching it unfold
and feeling all of the stress

and pressure. Yeah,
I just started crying.

I mean, I was like crying for

my friends
who were in the building

and for our country
and what it meant.

So yeah, I wanna
do everything possible

to make sure
that doesn't happen again.