Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[Music]
hello and welcome to philosophy vibe the
channel where we discuss and debate
different philosophical ideas today
we're going to be looking into the works
of the german philosopher george wilhelm
hegel and his ideas around the dialectic
and absolute idealism fascinating now
just a quick note on hegel's works
although seen as one of the greatest
modern philosophers hegel's work is very
profound but also very complicated and
at times confusing there is fierce
debates among philosophers as to how to
interpret hegel this video will give a
brief surface level view on hegel's work
yet i'm sure even this video will bring
philosophers to the comments to
challenge or clear up my explanation i
welcome all comments and ideas
particularly from those who speak german
as a first language and can better
translate his work now back to the video
the primary focus will be around hegel's
absolute idealism and how his dialectic
fits into this theory a bit of
background on idealism idealism is a
long-established philosophy and its core
principle is that the only things that
truly exist are ideas
george barkley's idealism in the 1700s
completely rejected the material world
and said that mata does not exist all of
reality is solely in the mind and
nothing exists but ideas
kant later developed this theory into
what is known as transcendental idealism
he claimed that there does exist such a
thing as a material world and material
objects can't refers to this as the
lumina what is described as being the
things in and of themselves however we
only perceive representations of the
pneumonia our minds create ideas of the
pneumonia through a spatial temporal
lens what we perceive is termed as the
phenomena so we can never perceive the
things in themselves but only our ideas
of the things we can only perceive the
phenomena we never have direct access to
the numenor i see building off of the
work of kant hegel is seen as an
idealist in his book phenomenology of
the spirit hegel claims the rational
alone is real this puts hagel firmly in
the idealist category as he is claiming
that the real is the rational in other
words our reality is our ideas however
hegel strongly criticized kant's
transcendental idealism mainly rejecting
the claim that we have no access or
knowledge of the numenor if we are so
detached from the pneumonia how can we
ponder explain or even believe in such a
thing hegel was not satisfied with this
version of idealism and so he developed
another version what we now refer to as
absolute idealism interesting so then
what exactly does hegel mean by the
rational alone is real
unlike barclay who believes every object
we see is an idea or camped who believed
time and space were ideas hegel pondered
ideas in a different perspective i want
you to consider ideas and concepts such
as culture traditions society
these are not objects these are not
things in themselves yet they do not
belong solely in our minds like pain or
taste they seem external and shared by
everyone
these types of ideas are then different
and they deserve their own category
hagel believed this third type of idea
belongs in all of us they are shared
ideas that exist in all people across
all of time hegel refers to this as the
spirit the ideas that are a part of us
yet separate and also belong to everyone
i see
so we are finite minds and there does
exist an external world beyond our mind
reality is not solely ideas however how
we perceive this reality is shaped by
our ideas the concepts we have is how we
understand the world and these ideas are
the product of the spirit shared ideas
across all people that shapes our
perception of reality and so
what is real the world around us is
determined by our ideas hegel claims the
world is a reflection of our ideas and
therefore only the rational is real and
all reality is spirit i understand hegel
believed the spirit is constantly
evolving and its goal is to reach the
absolute the absolute hegel describes as
the spirit that which is present to
itself in the certainty of unconditional
self-knowing
the way the spirit evolves to the
absolute is through what he refers to as
the dialectic now a dialectic is known
to be a conversation one person raises a
point another challenges this is them
rebutted and back and forth back and
forth until a truth is found or at least
edged closer to
this hegel believes is how the spirit
evolves and has always evolved
throughout time our cultures and
societies traditions beliefs norms and
values these are always evolving through
the dialectic they are shaping our
perception of reality and always
progressing to reach the absolute truth
hegel explains that at some point
someone will raise a thesis this is a
point or an idea about the world this
will contain a flaw or a contradiction
and so it will give rise to the
antithesis contradicting the original
idea as the dialectic goes back and
forth eventually a resolution will be
made and the synthesis will be reached
this is the better more evolved idea
than the original thesis this synthesis
now becomes a new thesis and of course
this will have some sort of flaw and
give rise to another antithesis and back
and forth back and forth until the new
synthesis is reached once again this new
synthesis will become a thesis and so on
and so on this is the dialectic and the
evolution of our ideas constantly
changing moving the spirit to the
absolute truth and changing our reality
brilliant we see proof of this in our
societies across the years we see how
social attitudes change how cultures
change how things that were once common
and accepted are no longer accepted laws
change customs change and people change
and this is down to the dialectic and
the spirit evolving yes indeed in
addition to the absolute spirit evolving
so too can the individual human hegel
believe this to be a process of
self-consciousness and
self-actualization
and this too will follow the dialectic
method
a person undergoing this
self-actualization will see themselves
as who they are they are conscious
beings and they will have ideas as to
who they are but we share this planet
with other conscious beings and other
conscious beings will also have ideas as
to who you are
self-consciousness then means to try and
see yourself as others see you how you
see yourself is the thesis how others
see you is the antithesis and the
process of the dialectic will hopefully
allow the individual to reach
self-consciousness as to who they truly
are and reach the absolute hegel used
the example of a master and a slave the
master sees himself one way the thesis
but for him to be a master means there
must be a slave and the slave must exist
for the master to be a master and so the
slave will have an idea and a perception
of the master the antithesis i see
so then according to hegel we have the
subjective mind and through the
dialectic we can reach
self-consciousness and
self-actualization
we then have the objective spirit the
collective spirit of all finite minds
and together through the dialectic the
spirit also grows and evolves all of
this together becomes the absolute or
the absolute spirit and for hegel this
absolute spirit is a kind of god it is
the totality of our reality all the
conscious minds and the complete spirit
the finite participating and evolving
through the infinite through the
absolute god is not a separate entity
god is the absolute our
self-consciousness is us participating
in god our collective spirit is the
collective participating in god we are
all part of this absolute we are the
subjective mind the spirit is the
objective mind and the mind of god is
the absolute and so we have absolute
idealism a truly fascinating theory and
a remarkable extension of the
traditional idealist beliefs it blends
the metaphysical with the social to give
us this absolute philosophy on our
reality in our relation to it indeed but
of course there are big problems with
hegel's absolute idealism and his ideas
around the dialectic like what focusing
first on the absolute spirit this as you
have explained is a type of god this is
the absolute of all minds and of reality
of the subjective self and the objective
spirit to me this makes hegel's idealism
sound more like a version of pantheism
the idea that we are all part of god and
that god is the absolute so god is
reality and we are part of god
schopenhauer raised a similar point
absolute idealism seems to be a fancy
and somewhat more complicated form of
pantheism and so it is open to all the
criticisms of pantheism i see what
you're saying most equate hegel's
idealism with monism so the belief that
everything is one and this would be the
absolute spirit sure but this still
leaves problems for the theory
particularly around free will how can
one be seen to be their own agent their
own person yet still be part of and
united with the whole monism raises a
lot of problems for agency i see myself
as a distinct separate entity with my
own mind and my own consciousness and my
own free will i do not feel like i am
one with another but you are part of
this universe and you do constitute part
of the whole so you are very much still
part of the whole but if my reality is
completely determined by the absolute
spirit then where does that leave free
will how can i have agency and freedom
to act and choose if my reality is
completely shaped by the spirit this
leaves a deterministic reality where i
am just a tiny mind moving along with
the greater spirit i don't then see how
we can derive self-consciousness and
self-actualization when we are just part
of the greater spirit i do not see a
self in monism just a oneness and so i
find the idea of the absolute spirit and
self-consciousness to be a complete
contradiction either we are part of the
absolute spirit and the only reality is
the absolute or we have agency i am my
own being and i can achieve
self-consciousness it can be only one or
the other but it cannot be both yes i
see your argument
further problems with hegel's idealism
is around the external world the world
outside of the concepts and ideas and
spirit i do not feel hegel gives a solid
account of what the material world is
and how nature itself can fit into
absolute idealism
berkeley rejects the external world
altogether kant posited the pneumonia
hegel leaves this huge area pretty much
untouched and it seems unsatisfactory
he criticizes kant's transcendental
idealism for his ideas on the numenor
and how it is too far removed from the
human experience i believe the same
criticism can be made on hegel's
absolute idealism how far does nature
and the external world play a part in
our reality and in our perception how
does the spirit and the physical
interact these points really do need to
be addressed hmm
moving on to the dialectic i would
challenge the argument that the
dialectic always evolves their concept
or idea closer to an absolute truth
throughout history we have seen
regressions in civilized societies we
have seen cultures destroy themselves
through bad ideas we have seen nations
adopt appalling practices that were
previously unexamined or not allowed
this has all happened through the
dialectic i would therefore argue that
the dialectic by no means always reaches
the absolute truth and involves the
spirit the dialectic can actually have
the complete opposite effect good point
philosophy vibe would like to thank
elaine for commissioning this video and
for the donation to the channel thank
you lane it is very much appreciated if
anyone else would like to work with us
in creating a philosophy by video then
please get in touch our email is below
if you would like the script to this
video and you would like to help support
the channel then please check out the
philosophy vibe philosophy of perception
ebook available on amazon this script is
also included in our metaphysics
paperback anthology also available on
amazon the links are below and finally
for the really passionate philosophers
out there our merch store may have some
interesting items for you so make sure
you check them out but that's all the
time we have for now thank you for
watching we hope you enjoyed the vibe
and what does everyone else think of
hegel's absolute idealism who perhaps
has other interpretations of the theory
or further criticisms let us know in the
comments below don't forget to like and
share and for more philosophical debates
please subscribe to the channel take
care and we look forward to seeing you
all soon bye
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.