All language subtitles for CPU & GPU Scaling Benchmark, Ryzen 5 7600 vs. Ryzen 5 5600_ Is Zen 4 Worth It_-en

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,780 --> 00:00:06,020 foreign 1 00:00:02,470 --> 00:00:09,480 [Music] 2 00:00:06,020 --> 00:00:11,760 box today I am back with another CPU and 3 00:00:09,480 --> 00:00:14,639 GPU scaling video and this time I'll be 4 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:16,859 focusing on the ryzen 5 7 600 and ryzen 5 00:00:14,639 --> 00:00:19,380 5 5600 which admittedly are two 6 00:00:16,859 --> 00:00:21,119 different classes of product but I want 7 00:00:19,380 --> 00:00:23,220 to work out at which point the jump up 8 00:00:21,119 --> 00:00:26,279 from the affordable 5600 to the 9 00:00:23,220 --> 00:00:27,960 relatively expensive 7600 Meg sense so 10 00:00:26,279 --> 00:00:29,220 today that's what we'll be doing but 11 00:00:27,960 --> 00:00:31,199 before we do 12 00:00:29,220 --> 00:00:33,780 today's video is sponsored by gigabyte 13 00:00:31,199 --> 00:00:36,000 and their aorus and Aero RTX 30 Series 14 00:00:33,780 --> 00:00:38,040 Laptops these excellent machines for 15 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:41,100 gamers and creators are powered by up to 16 00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:43,739 an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 TI graphics 17 00:00:41,100 --> 00:00:46,320 card and up to Intel Core I9 processors 18 00:00:43,739 --> 00:00:48,840 Gamers will be interested in the aura 19 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:51,600 17x featuring high performance GeForce 20 00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:54,300 RTX Graphics support for dlss and Ray 21 00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:56,940 tracing a super fast 360 Hertz display 22 00:00:54,300 --> 00:00:59,399 and heaps of cooling power for creators 23 00:00:56,940 --> 00:01:01,500 check out the Aero 16 with its 4K OLED 24 00:00:59,399 --> 00:01:04,559 display portable form factor and 25 00:01:01,500 --> 00:01:06,240 efficient GeForce RTX GPU there's plenty 26 00:01:04,559 --> 00:01:08,820 of other options in gigabytes lineup as 27 00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:11,580 well so learn more via the links below 28 00:01:08,820 --> 00:01:12,960 okay so recently I updated our cost per 29 00:01:11,580 --> 00:01:15,360 Frame data and found that a 30 00:01:12,960 --> 00:01:18,659 well-equipped ryzen 5 5600 platform 31 00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:20,640 would cost 365 dollars U.S while a 32 00:01:18,659 --> 00:01:24,479 similarly equipped 7600 configuration 33 00:01:20,640 --> 00:01:27,420 was a massive 53 more expensive at 560 34 00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:29,820 us now across the 10 games tested the 35 00:01:27,420 --> 00:01:32,220 zen4 processor was 33 faster on average 36 00:01:29,820 --> 00:01:35,040 which did help improve its value but 37 00:01:32,220 --> 00:01:37,380 even so it was still 16 more costly per 38 00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:39,479 frame naturally for those of you already 39 00:01:37,380 --> 00:01:41,040 on the am4 platform using an older 40 00:01:39,479 --> 00:01:43,140 generation processor or maybe you just 41 00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:45,780 have a good quality ddr4 kit that you 42 00:01:43,140 --> 00:01:48,180 want to carry over the 5600 is going to 43 00:01:45,780 --> 00:01:50,700 be a no-brainer as it presents as a 44 00:01:48,180 --> 00:01:52,500 significantly cheaper upgrade but if 45 00:01:50,700 --> 00:01:54,000 you're building an entirely new PC from 46 00:01:52,500 --> 00:01:55,799 the ground up which you are really 47 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:58,740 forced into doing if you do choose to go 48 00:01:55,799 --> 00:02:00,780 the ryzen 57600 but in that situation is 49 00:01:58,740 --> 00:02:03,420 the newest N4 processor and it's more 50 00:02:00,780 --> 00:02:04,380 future-proof am5 platform worth the 51 00:02:03,420 --> 00:02:06,060 investment 52 00:02:04,380 --> 00:02:08,580 for those of you looking at buying a 53 00:02:06,060 --> 00:02:10,440 high-end GeForce 40 or Radeon 7000 54 00:02:08,580 --> 00:02:13,140 series GPU I'd say yeah the upgrade to 55 00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:14,940 Z4 is worth it over Zen three but what 56 00:02:13,140 --> 00:02:17,760 if you're using a previous generation 57 00:02:14,940 --> 00:02:19,800 GPU I asked this question because slower 58 00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:22,620 gpus will see most gaming situations 59 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:23,640 more GPU limited than CPU limited and 60 00:02:22,620 --> 00:02:26,879 therefore the difference between the 61 00:02:23,640 --> 00:02:28,860 5600 and 7600 will be a lot less obvious 62 00:02:26,879 --> 00:02:30,720 but of course that all changes when you 63 00:02:28,860 --> 00:02:33,060 upgrade to a faster graphics card in the 64 00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:35,040 future which is why CP limited CPU 65 00:02:33,060 --> 00:02:37,020 testing makes the most sense but a lot 66 00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:39,060 of you enjoy the GPU scaling Benchmark 67 00:02:37,020 --> 00:02:41,280 so let's get into it 68 00:02:39,060 --> 00:02:43,739 first up we have Watchdogs Legion using 69 00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:46,560 the very high quality preset at 1080P 70 00:02:43,739 --> 00:02:49,080 and when armed with the RTX 4090 the 71 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:52,680 7600 delivered 32 more performance than 72 00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:54,540 the 5600 hitting 149 FPS the margins 73 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:57,000 were much the same using the 6950 XT 74 00:02:54,540 --> 00:02:59,160 though frame rates were higher overall 75 00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:01,620 due to the Nvidia Drive ahead issue 76 00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:04,140 which often raises ugly head in CPU 77 00:03:01,620 --> 00:03:07,560 limited scenarios Now using the much 78 00:03:04,140 --> 00:03:10,680 more modest 6650 XT we see that the 7600 79 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:12,840 is now just 13 faster than the 5600 80 00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:14,640 which admittedly is still a reasonable 81 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,920 margin but certainly doesn't come close 82 00:03:14,640 --> 00:03:19,260 to justifying the price premium 83 00:03:16,920 --> 00:03:21,000 the total war Warhammer 3 results are 84 00:03:19,260 --> 00:03:22,739 pretty interesting and probably more 85 00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:25,980 like what you'd typically expect to see 86 00:03:22,739 --> 00:03:28,560 from a GPU CPU scaling Benchmark using 87 00:03:25,980 --> 00:03:30,959 three different GPU performance tiers we 88 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:34,019 see when using the RTX 49 that the 7600 89 00:03:30,959 --> 00:03:37,379 is a massive 46 faster than the 5600 90 00:03:34,019 --> 00:03:39,659 reaching almost 300 FPS but when 91 00:03:37,379 --> 00:03:41,819 downgrading to the 6950 XT which is 92 00:03:39,659 --> 00:03:44,760 still a very powerful GPU producing 93 00:03:41,819 --> 00:03:46,680 almost 200 FPS on average the 7600 was 94 00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:50,159 just three percent faster than the 5600 95 00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:52,319 then when testing with the 6650 XT we 96 00:03:50,159 --> 00:03:54,720 see no difference in performance so for 97 00:03:52,319 --> 00:03:57,840 a game like Warhammer 3 the 7600 just 98 00:03:54,720 --> 00:03:59,580 isn't worth it over the 5600 but if the 99 00:03:57,840 --> 00:04:01,860 49er results are any indication of 100 00:03:59,580 --> 00:04:04,019 future gaming performance then the 7600 101 00:04:01,860 --> 00:04:06,360 would be worth the premium the question 102 00:04:04,019 --> 00:04:07,680 is though when will that future become a 103 00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:09,959 reality 104 00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:12,540 Hitman 3 has a mixed bag of results for 105 00:04:09,959 --> 00:04:15,840 us firstly using the RTX 49er we see 106 00:04:12,540 --> 00:04:18,180 that the 7600 is 42 faster than the 5600 107 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:21,060 so a seriously big performance Advantage 108 00:04:18,180 --> 00:04:24,180 for the new zn4 processor but that 109 00:04:21,060 --> 00:04:26,220 margin is closed down to 27 with the 110 00:04:24,180 --> 00:04:28,380 6950 XT and that's still a big win for 111 00:04:26,220 --> 00:04:30,720 Zen four but with less driver overhead 112 00:04:28,380 --> 00:04:32,280 with the Radeon GPU the slower 5600 113 00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:34,979 performs much better 114 00:04:32,280 --> 00:04:36,780 then once we move down to the 6650 XT 115 00:04:34,979 --> 00:04:40,620 the performance margins are neutralized 116 00:04:36,780 --> 00:04:42,720 as the results become 100 GPU Limited 117 00:04:40,620 --> 00:04:44,580 here we see that the a plague tail 118 00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:47,759 Requiem results are quite interesting 119 00:04:44,580 --> 00:04:50,100 the ryzen 5 5600 and core I3 13 100 120 00:04:47,759 --> 00:04:52,860 really gets smashed by the Nvidia driver 121 00:04:50,100 --> 00:04:54,840 I've had using the RTX 4090 but this is 122 00:04:52,860 --> 00:04:57,660 far less of an issue for the more 123 00:04:54,840 --> 00:04:59,880 powerful 7600 though it was still six 124 00:04:57,660 --> 00:05:02,699 percent fast using the 650 XT under 125 00:04:59,880 --> 00:05:06,000 these conditions point is though using 126 00:05:02,699 --> 00:05:08,580 the RTX 490 the 7600 was 36 faster than 127 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:12,060 the 5600 while that margin is reduced to 128 00:05:08,580 --> 00:05:15,660 just 15 with the 6950 XT and then 129 00:05:12,060 --> 00:05:18,120 completely neutralized with the 6650 XT 130 00:05:15,660 --> 00:05:20,100 Now Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 is a 131 00:05:18,120 --> 00:05:22,320 game where at least 200 FPS is 132 00:05:20,100 --> 00:05:24,060 advantageous and as a competitive 133 00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:25,440 shooter it's a game where the more 134 00:05:24,060 --> 00:05:27,419 serious players will opt for lower 135 00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:29,520 quality settings not just to improve the 136 00:05:27,419 --> 00:05:31,320 frame rate but in fact more so to 137 00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:33,600 improve the player's ability to spot 138 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:36,780 enemies so this is an example where a 139 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:39,360 more powerful CPU such as the 7600 is of 140 00:05:36,780 --> 00:05:42,300 real benefit delivering 42 more frames 141 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:44,340 than the 5600 used in the RTX 4090 142 00:05:42,300 --> 00:05:46,800 though that margin was reduced to 28 143 00:05:44,340 --> 00:05:49,680 with the 6950 XT 144 00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:51,660 now for most Gamers the 190ish frames 145 00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:53,759 per second delivered by the 6650 XT 146 00:05:51,660 --> 00:05:55,979 that'll be enough and if you fall into 147 00:05:53,759 --> 00:05:58,139 that category then for the most part the 148 00:05:55,979 --> 00:06:01,500 7600 has little to offer but as 149 00:05:58,139 --> 00:06:03,180 demonstrated by the 4090 and 6950 XT for 150 00:06:01,500 --> 00:06:05,220 the more demanding sections of the game 151 00:06:03,180 --> 00:06:08,160 it's possible that the 7600 will deliver 152 00:06:05,220 --> 00:06:09,479 much more performance even with a lesser 153 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:11,699 GPU 154 00:06:09,479 --> 00:06:14,160 the big Advantage for the 7600 in 155 00:06:11,699 --> 00:06:17,280 Spider-Man remaster is its use of ddr5 156 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:19,979 memory armed with the RTX 490 the 7600 157 00:06:17,280 --> 00:06:24,180 provided 35 more frames than the 5600 158 00:06:19,979 --> 00:06:25,680 going from 82 to 111 FPS and that margin 159 00:06:24,180 --> 00:06:28,440 remained much the same when using the 160 00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:31,979 6950 XT and interestingly both ryzen 161 00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:34,380 CPUs were slower with the 6950 XT while 162 00:06:31,979 --> 00:06:36,960 the more CPU limited 13 100 actually 163 00:06:34,380 --> 00:06:39,240 received a performance boost then we see 164 00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:42,240 that with the 6650 XT the results become 165 00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:44,460 largely GPU limited though the 7600 did 166 00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:45,840 still manage to best the 5600 by an 8 167 00:06:44,460 --> 00:06:47,759 margin 168 00:06:45,840 --> 00:06:50,639 the shadow of the Tomb Raider scaling is 169 00:06:47,759 --> 00:06:53,759 very typical using the RTX 490 the 7600 170 00:06:50,639 --> 00:06:57,479 was 34 faster than 5600 and that margin 171 00:06:53,759 --> 00:07:00,300 was reduced to 20 with the 6950 XT as 172 00:06:57,479 --> 00:07:03,479 the 7600 became GPU limited then with 173 00:07:00,300 --> 00:07:05,940 the 6650 xtl3 CPUs are heavily GPU 174 00:07:03,479 --> 00:07:07,259 Limited at around 110 FPS which 175 00:07:05,940 --> 00:07:10,500 admittedly is more than enough 176 00:07:07,259 --> 00:07:12,660 performance to fully enjoy this title 177 00:07:10,500 --> 00:07:14,340 scaling in Horizon zero Dawn is very 178 00:07:12,660 --> 00:07:17,220 similar to that of shadow of the Tomb 179 00:07:14,340 --> 00:07:21,060 Raider the 7600 was 24 fast using the 180 00:07:17,220 --> 00:07:22,800 RTX 4090 and 23 faster with the 6950 XT 181 00:07:21,060 --> 00:07:25,919 so a clear performance Advantage here 182 00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:28,500 for the newer zn4 processor but by the 183 00:07:25,919 --> 00:07:30,900 time we get down to the 6650 XT the 184 00:07:28,500 --> 00:07:32,520 results are entirely GPU limited with 185 00:07:30,900 --> 00:07:34,199 less than a five percent performance 186 00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:36,360 deviation 187 00:07:34,199 --> 00:07:39,120 the cyberpunk 2077 results are 188 00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:41,940 interesting as here the 7600 delivered 189 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:44,280 35 more performance than the 5600 using 190 00:07:41,940 --> 00:07:45,900 the RTX 4090 so a massive performance 191 00:07:44,280 --> 00:07:48,780 Advantage here for the newer Zen 4 192 00:07:45,900 --> 00:07:51,419 processor however switching to the 6950 193 00:07:48,780 --> 00:07:53,160 XT reduces that margin of 14 as the 194 00:07:51,419 --> 00:07:56,220 Radeon GPU improves upon the performance 195 00:07:53,160 --> 00:07:58,860 of the 5600 by a 12 margin while the 196 00:07:56,220 --> 00:08:01,199 7600 is now GPU limited reducing the 197 00:07:58,860 --> 00:08:03,240 performance there by five percent then 198 00:08:01,199 --> 00:08:05,880 as you'd expect we're GPU limited using 199 00:08:03,240 --> 00:08:09,419 the 6950 XT and this saw all CPUs 200 00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:12,180 delivering around 95 to 96 FPS 201 00:08:09,419 --> 00:08:15,060 the ACC results are all heavily CPU 202 00:08:12,180 --> 00:08:17,880 limited regardless of the GPU used using 203 00:08:15,060 --> 00:08:21,120 the Radeon gpus the 7600 was 35 faster 204 00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:25,319 the 5600 and quite oddly that margin was 205 00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:27,840 reduced to 28 with the RTX 4090 still at 206 00:08:25,319 --> 00:08:30,300 around 30 faster than the 5600 the 207 00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:32,580 newest N4 processor is offering massive 208 00:08:30,300 --> 00:08:33,899 performance gains in this title 209 00:08:32,580 --> 00:08:35,700 the second last game we're going to look 210 00:08:33,899 --> 00:08:37,919 at is the rift breaker and this one 211 00:08:35,700 --> 00:08:40,380 doesn't require massive frame rates so 212 00:08:37,919 --> 00:08:41,880 any of these CPUs will work fine but 213 00:08:40,380 --> 00:08:43,919 we're using this more as a tool to 214 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:47,580 measure performance and we find the 7600 215 00:08:43,919 --> 00:08:50,339 is 40 faster than the 5600 used in the 216 00:08:47,580 --> 00:08:53,220 RTX 4090 and then 22 faster with the 217 00:08:50,339 --> 00:08:56,880 6950 XT before the data becomes entirely 218 00:08:53,220 --> 00:08:58,860 GPU limited with the 6650xt 219 00:08:56,880 --> 00:09:00,779 last up we have Counter-Strike Global 220 00:08:58,860 --> 00:09:03,360 offense even like ACC this is another 221 00:09:00,779 --> 00:09:06,360 game that's heavily CPU limited and as a 222 00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:09,000 result the 7600 was between 26 and 28 223 00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:12,600 faster than the 5600 across the board 224 00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:14,160 even when using the 6650 XT 225 00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:17,100 now here's a look at the 12-game average 226 00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:20,100 using the RTX 4090 we see the 7600 was 227 00:09:17,100 --> 00:09:22,860 on average 35 faster than 5600 though 228 00:09:20,100 --> 00:09:25,740 that margin is reduced to 23 with the 229 00:09:22,860 --> 00:09:28,680 6950 XT it's interesting to note that 230 00:09:25,740 --> 00:09:31,620 here the 5600 was faster using the 6950 231 00:09:28,680 --> 00:09:34,019 XT opposed to the RTX 4090 while the 232 00:09:31,620 --> 00:09:36,120 opposite is true of the 7600 and again 233 00:09:34,019 --> 00:09:38,160 this is due to nvidia's driver overhead 234 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:40,800 issue which hurts C performance when 235 00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:43,080 utilization is high then we see thanks 236 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:45,839 to heavily CPU limited titles such as CS 237 00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:48,600 go and ACC the 7600 is still seven 238 00:09:45,839 --> 00:09:50,640 percent faster on average using the 6650 239 00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:52,080 XT though this isn't necessarily the 240 00:09:50,640 --> 00:09:55,140 kind of margin that would get you to 241 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:57,420 invest in Zen 4. there's no denying that 242 00:09:55,140 --> 00:10:00,180 the ryzen 5 7600 is much more powerful 243 00:09:57,420 --> 00:10:01,880 than the 5600 just is it's typically 244 00:10:00,180 --> 00:10:04,860 improved gaming performance by around 30 245 00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:07,740 but often much more than that especially 246 00:10:04,860 --> 00:10:09,720 when heavily CPU limited you also don't 247 00:10:07,740 --> 00:10:11,940 always need an extreme GPU such as the 248 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:15,000 RTX 490 to see the difference the 249 00:10:11,940 --> 00:10:16,920 upgrade from the 5600 to the 7600 could 250 00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:18,959 certainly be justified with a much more 251 00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:20,279 affordable graphics card but at the same 252 00:10:18,959 --> 00:10:22,800 time it's not going to be all that 253 00:10:20,279 --> 00:10:25,320 beneficial for everyone in fact I'd say 254 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:28,200 for most ryzen 5 5600 owners the upgrade 255 00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:30,000 to the 7600 is a bit pointless as I 256 00:10:28,200 --> 00:10:32,820 noted earlier the upgraded Zen four will 257 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:36,240 cost you at least 560 us for a basic 258 00:10:32,820 --> 00:10:38,940 b650 Board of course the ryzen 5 7600 259 00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:41,519 and then 32 gigabytes of decent ddr5 260 00:10:38,940 --> 00:10:44,279 memory so a better alternative for am4 261 00:10:41,519 --> 00:10:47,700 owners looking to achieve 7 600 like 262 00:10:44,279 --> 00:10:51,000 performance is the ryzen 7 5800x3d 263 00:10:47,700 --> 00:10:53,339 currently available for 340 a roughly 40 264 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:55,680 discount when compared to the 7600 265 00:10:53,339 --> 00:10:57,360 upgrade for again basically the same 266 00:10:55,680 --> 00:10:59,279 level of performance 267 00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:01,320 however if you're a new system builder 268 00:10:59,279 --> 00:11:03,240 tossing up between these two CPUs the 269 00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:05,579 choice is a lot more difficult well 270 00:11:03,240 --> 00:11:06,839 maybe it's not obviously if you want to 271 00:11:05,579 --> 00:11:09,060 spend as little money as possible then 272 00:11:06,839 --> 00:11:11,160 the 5600 is the way to go but if you're 273 00:11:09,060 --> 00:11:13,260 looking to maximize your investment the 274 00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:15,959 7600 might actually be the smarter 275 00:11:13,260 --> 00:11:18,660 choice although the 7600 package costs 276 00:11:15,959 --> 00:11:20,579 at least 53 more we did see on average 277 00:11:18,660 --> 00:11:22,800 30 more performance with a relatively 278 00:11:20,579 --> 00:11:25,260 high in GPU so a good performance uplift 279 00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:28,440 there and further adding to the value of 280 00:11:25,260 --> 00:11:31,260 the 7600 is the am5 platform which will 281 00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:34,440 support future CPUs meaning the cheap 282 00:11:31,260 --> 00:11:36,480 and easy 5800x 3d upgrade situation 5600 283 00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:38,519 owners can take advantage of or those 284 00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:40,320 with much older am4 processes for that 285 00:11:38,519 --> 00:11:42,899 matter could end up being a similar 286 00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:45,240 situation for 7 600 owners in a few 287 00:11:42,899 --> 00:11:47,579 years time of course we just don't know 288 00:11:45,240 --> 00:11:49,740 how the am5 story will play out but we 289 00:11:47,579 --> 00:11:52,680 know how the am4 story has played out 290 00:11:49,740 --> 00:11:54,360 and that story has now ended in my 291 00:11:52,680 --> 00:11:57,300 opinion there's really no wrong or right 292 00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:59,160 choice here both are very viable the 56 293 00:11:57,300 --> 00:12:01,019 hundred it's still perfectly capable 294 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:03,480 when it comes to gaming especially if 295 00:12:01,019 --> 00:12:05,339 you're using more modest GPU and you 296 00:12:03,480 --> 00:12:07,680 tend to mostly play single player titles 297 00:12:05,339 --> 00:12:09,600 but even then it is still very capable 298 00:12:07,680 --> 00:12:12,600 as a competitive sort of multiplayer 299 00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:14,279 gaming CPU but of course the 7600 will 300 00:12:12,600 --> 00:12:16,500 generally take performance to the next 301 00:12:14,279 --> 00:12:18,480 level so really it is up to you to 302 00:12:16,500 --> 00:12:20,640 decide which of these options is best 303 00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:23,100 for you and with that I'm going to end 304 00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:24,600 this video here hope you liked it do one 305 00:12:23,100 --> 00:12:26,459 of those if you did you can also 306 00:12:24,600 --> 00:12:28,800 subscribe for more content we have float 307 00:12:26,459 --> 00:12:30,480 plane or patreon either of those help 308 00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:32,399 support the channel and give you access 309 00:12:30,480 --> 00:12:33,660 to some pretty cool perks we do a 310 00:12:32,399 --> 00:12:35,160 monthly live stream team and I get 311 00:12:33,660 --> 00:12:38,040 together and do that answer your 312 00:12:35,160 --> 00:12:39,660 questions live q a Discord server rather 313 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:41,220 where we well we have q a stuff there as 314 00:12:39,660 --> 00:12:42,959 well but Discord server where you can 315 00:12:41,220 --> 00:12:44,940 ask questions Tim and I are active there 316 00:12:42,959 --> 00:12:46,620 q and A's behind the scenes content a 317 00:12:44,940 --> 00:12:48,300 lot of cool stuff so if you're 318 00:12:46,620 --> 00:12:50,160 interested check out patreon float plane 319 00:12:48,300 --> 00:12:51,060 but if not that is perfectly fine and I 320 00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:53,040 would like to thank you for watching 321 00:12:51,060 --> 00:12:55,459 this video let me know Steve see you 322 00:12:53,040 --> 00:12:55,459 next time 323 00:12:56,370 --> 00:13:08,000 [Music] 324 00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:08,000 thank you 325 00:13:08,330 --> 00:13:11,379 [Music] 24584

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.