Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,780 --> 00:00:06,020
foreign
1
00:00:02,470 --> 00:00:09,480
[Music]
2
00:00:06,020 --> 00:00:11,760
box today I am back with another CPU and
3
00:00:09,480 --> 00:00:14,639
GPU scaling video and this time I'll be
4
00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:16,859
focusing on the ryzen 5 7 600 and ryzen
5
00:00:14,639 --> 00:00:19,380
5 5600 which admittedly are two
6
00:00:16,859 --> 00:00:21,119
different classes of product but I want
7
00:00:19,380 --> 00:00:23,220
to work out at which point the jump up
8
00:00:21,119 --> 00:00:26,279
from the affordable 5600 to the
9
00:00:23,220 --> 00:00:27,960
relatively expensive 7600 Meg sense so
10
00:00:26,279 --> 00:00:29,220
today that's what we'll be doing but
11
00:00:27,960 --> 00:00:31,199
before we do
12
00:00:29,220 --> 00:00:33,780
today's video is sponsored by gigabyte
13
00:00:31,199 --> 00:00:36,000
and their aorus and Aero RTX 30 Series
14
00:00:33,780 --> 00:00:38,040
Laptops these excellent machines for
15
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:41,100
gamers and creators are powered by up to
16
00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:43,739
an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 TI graphics
17
00:00:41,100 --> 00:00:46,320
card and up to Intel Core I9 processors
18
00:00:43,739 --> 00:00:48,840
Gamers will be interested in the aura
19
00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:51,600
17x featuring high performance GeForce
20
00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:54,300
RTX Graphics support for dlss and Ray
21
00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:56,940
tracing a super fast 360 Hertz display
22
00:00:54,300 --> 00:00:59,399
and heaps of cooling power for creators
23
00:00:56,940 --> 00:01:01,500
check out the Aero 16 with its 4K OLED
24
00:00:59,399 --> 00:01:04,559
display portable form factor and
25
00:01:01,500 --> 00:01:06,240
efficient GeForce RTX GPU there's plenty
26
00:01:04,559 --> 00:01:08,820
of other options in gigabytes lineup as
27
00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:11,580
well so learn more via the links below
28
00:01:08,820 --> 00:01:12,960
okay so recently I updated our cost per
29
00:01:11,580 --> 00:01:15,360
Frame data and found that a
30
00:01:12,960 --> 00:01:18,659
well-equipped ryzen 5 5600 platform
31
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:20,640
would cost 365 dollars U.S while a
32
00:01:18,659 --> 00:01:24,479
similarly equipped 7600 configuration
33
00:01:20,640 --> 00:01:27,420
was a massive 53 more expensive at 560
34
00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:29,820
us now across the 10 games tested the
35
00:01:27,420 --> 00:01:32,220
zen4 processor was 33 faster on average
36
00:01:29,820 --> 00:01:35,040
which did help improve its value but
37
00:01:32,220 --> 00:01:37,380
even so it was still 16 more costly per
38
00:01:35,040 --> 00:01:39,479
frame naturally for those of you already
39
00:01:37,380 --> 00:01:41,040
on the am4 platform using an older
40
00:01:39,479 --> 00:01:43,140
generation processor or maybe you just
41
00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:45,780
have a good quality ddr4 kit that you
42
00:01:43,140 --> 00:01:48,180
want to carry over the 5600 is going to
43
00:01:45,780 --> 00:01:50,700
be a no-brainer as it presents as a
44
00:01:48,180 --> 00:01:52,500
significantly cheaper upgrade but if
45
00:01:50,700 --> 00:01:54,000
you're building an entirely new PC from
46
00:01:52,500 --> 00:01:55,799
the ground up which you are really
47
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:58,740
forced into doing if you do choose to go
48
00:01:55,799 --> 00:02:00,780
the ryzen 57600 but in that situation is
49
00:01:58,740 --> 00:02:03,420
the newest N4 processor and it's more
50
00:02:00,780 --> 00:02:04,380
future-proof am5 platform worth the
51
00:02:03,420 --> 00:02:06,060
investment
52
00:02:04,380 --> 00:02:08,580
for those of you looking at buying a
53
00:02:06,060 --> 00:02:10,440
high-end GeForce 40 or Radeon 7000
54
00:02:08,580 --> 00:02:13,140
series GPU I'd say yeah the upgrade to
55
00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:14,940
Z4 is worth it over Zen three but what
56
00:02:13,140 --> 00:02:17,760
if you're using a previous generation
57
00:02:14,940 --> 00:02:19,800
GPU I asked this question because slower
58
00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:22,620
gpus will see most gaming situations
59
00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:23,640
more GPU limited than CPU limited and
60
00:02:22,620 --> 00:02:26,879
therefore the difference between the
61
00:02:23,640 --> 00:02:28,860
5600 and 7600 will be a lot less obvious
62
00:02:26,879 --> 00:02:30,720
but of course that all changes when you
63
00:02:28,860 --> 00:02:33,060
upgrade to a faster graphics card in the
64
00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:35,040
future which is why CP limited CPU
65
00:02:33,060 --> 00:02:37,020
testing makes the most sense but a lot
66
00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:39,060
of you enjoy the GPU scaling Benchmark
67
00:02:37,020 --> 00:02:41,280
so let's get into it
68
00:02:39,060 --> 00:02:43,739
first up we have Watchdogs Legion using
69
00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:46,560
the very high quality preset at 1080P
70
00:02:43,739 --> 00:02:49,080
and when armed with the RTX 4090 the
71
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:52,680
7600 delivered 32 more performance than
72
00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:54,540
the 5600 hitting 149 FPS the margins
73
00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:57,000
were much the same using the 6950 XT
74
00:02:54,540 --> 00:02:59,160
though frame rates were higher overall
75
00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:01,620
due to the Nvidia Drive ahead issue
76
00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:04,140
which often raises ugly head in CPU
77
00:03:01,620 --> 00:03:07,560
limited scenarios Now using the much
78
00:03:04,140 --> 00:03:10,680
more modest 6650 XT we see that the 7600
79
00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:12,840
is now just 13 faster than the 5600
80
00:03:10,680 --> 00:03:14,640
which admittedly is still a reasonable
81
00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,920
margin but certainly doesn't come close
82
00:03:14,640 --> 00:03:19,260
to justifying the price premium
83
00:03:16,920 --> 00:03:21,000
the total war Warhammer 3 results are
84
00:03:19,260 --> 00:03:22,739
pretty interesting and probably more
85
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:25,980
like what you'd typically expect to see
86
00:03:22,739 --> 00:03:28,560
from a GPU CPU scaling Benchmark using
87
00:03:25,980 --> 00:03:30,959
three different GPU performance tiers we
88
00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:34,019
see when using the RTX 49 that the 7600
89
00:03:30,959 --> 00:03:37,379
is a massive 46 faster than the 5600
90
00:03:34,019 --> 00:03:39,659
reaching almost 300 FPS but when
91
00:03:37,379 --> 00:03:41,819
downgrading to the 6950 XT which is
92
00:03:39,659 --> 00:03:44,760
still a very powerful GPU producing
93
00:03:41,819 --> 00:03:46,680
almost 200 FPS on average the 7600 was
94
00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:50,159
just three percent faster than the 5600
95
00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:52,319
then when testing with the 6650 XT we
96
00:03:50,159 --> 00:03:54,720
see no difference in performance so for
97
00:03:52,319 --> 00:03:57,840
a game like Warhammer 3 the 7600 just
98
00:03:54,720 --> 00:03:59,580
isn't worth it over the 5600 but if the
99
00:03:57,840 --> 00:04:01,860
49er results are any indication of
100
00:03:59,580 --> 00:04:04,019
future gaming performance then the 7600
101
00:04:01,860 --> 00:04:06,360
would be worth the premium the question
102
00:04:04,019 --> 00:04:07,680
is though when will that future become a
103
00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:09,959
reality
104
00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:12,540
Hitman 3 has a mixed bag of results for
105
00:04:09,959 --> 00:04:15,840
us firstly using the RTX 49er we see
106
00:04:12,540 --> 00:04:18,180
that the 7600 is 42 faster than the 5600
107
00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:21,060
so a seriously big performance Advantage
108
00:04:18,180 --> 00:04:24,180
for the new zn4 processor but that
109
00:04:21,060 --> 00:04:26,220
margin is closed down to 27 with the
110
00:04:24,180 --> 00:04:28,380
6950 XT and that's still a big win for
111
00:04:26,220 --> 00:04:30,720
Zen four but with less driver overhead
112
00:04:28,380 --> 00:04:32,280
with the Radeon GPU the slower 5600
113
00:04:30,720 --> 00:04:34,979
performs much better
114
00:04:32,280 --> 00:04:36,780
then once we move down to the 6650 XT
115
00:04:34,979 --> 00:04:40,620
the performance margins are neutralized
116
00:04:36,780 --> 00:04:42,720
as the results become 100 GPU Limited
117
00:04:40,620 --> 00:04:44,580
here we see that the a plague tail
118
00:04:42,720 --> 00:04:47,759
Requiem results are quite interesting
119
00:04:44,580 --> 00:04:50,100
the ryzen 5 5600 and core I3 13 100
120
00:04:47,759 --> 00:04:52,860
really gets smashed by the Nvidia driver
121
00:04:50,100 --> 00:04:54,840
I've had using the RTX 4090 but this is
122
00:04:52,860 --> 00:04:57,660
far less of an issue for the more
123
00:04:54,840 --> 00:04:59,880
powerful 7600 though it was still six
124
00:04:57,660 --> 00:05:02,699
percent fast using the 650 XT under
125
00:04:59,880 --> 00:05:06,000
these conditions point is though using
126
00:05:02,699 --> 00:05:08,580
the RTX 490 the 7600 was 36 faster than
127
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:12,060
the 5600 while that margin is reduced to
128
00:05:08,580 --> 00:05:15,660
just 15 with the 6950 XT and then
129
00:05:12,060 --> 00:05:18,120
completely neutralized with the 6650 XT
130
00:05:15,660 --> 00:05:20,100
Now Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 is a
131
00:05:18,120 --> 00:05:22,320
game where at least 200 FPS is
132
00:05:20,100 --> 00:05:24,060
advantageous and as a competitive
133
00:05:22,320 --> 00:05:25,440
shooter it's a game where the more
134
00:05:24,060 --> 00:05:27,419
serious players will opt for lower
135
00:05:25,440 --> 00:05:29,520
quality settings not just to improve the
136
00:05:27,419 --> 00:05:31,320
frame rate but in fact more so to
137
00:05:29,520 --> 00:05:33,600
improve the player's ability to spot
138
00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:36,780
enemies so this is an example where a
139
00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:39,360
more powerful CPU such as the 7600 is of
140
00:05:36,780 --> 00:05:42,300
real benefit delivering 42 more frames
141
00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:44,340
than the 5600 used in the RTX 4090
142
00:05:42,300 --> 00:05:46,800
though that margin was reduced to 28
143
00:05:44,340 --> 00:05:49,680
with the 6950 XT
144
00:05:46,800 --> 00:05:51,660
now for most Gamers the 190ish frames
145
00:05:49,680 --> 00:05:53,759
per second delivered by the 6650 XT
146
00:05:51,660 --> 00:05:55,979
that'll be enough and if you fall into
147
00:05:53,759 --> 00:05:58,139
that category then for the most part the
148
00:05:55,979 --> 00:06:01,500
7600 has little to offer but as
149
00:05:58,139 --> 00:06:03,180
demonstrated by the 4090 and 6950 XT for
150
00:06:01,500 --> 00:06:05,220
the more demanding sections of the game
151
00:06:03,180 --> 00:06:08,160
it's possible that the 7600 will deliver
152
00:06:05,220 --> 00:06:09,479
much more performance even with a lesser
153
00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:11,699
GPU
154
00:06:09,479 --> 00:06:14,160
the big Advantage for the 7600 in
155
00:06:11,699 --> 00:06:17,280
Spider-Man remaster is its use of ddr5
156
00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:19,979
memory armed with the RTX 490 the 7600
157
00:06:17,280 --> 00:06:24,180
provided 35 more frames than the 5600
158
00:06:19,979 --> 00:06:25,680
going from 82 to 111 FPS and that margin
159
00:06:24,180 --> 00:06:28,440
remained much the same when using the
160
00:06:25,680 --> 00:06:31,979
6950 XT and interestingly both ryzen
161
00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:34,380
CPUs were slower with the 6950 XT while
162
00:06:31,979 --> 00:06:36,960
the more CPU limited 13 100 actually
163
00:06:34,380 --> 00:06:39,240
received a performance boost then we see
164
00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:42,240
that with the 6650 XT the results become
165
00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:44,460
largely GPU limited though the 7600 did
166
00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:45,840
still manage to best the 5600 by an 8
167
00:06:44,460 --> 00:06:47,759
margin
168
00:06:45,840 --> 00:06:50,639
the shadow of the Tomb Raider scaling is
169
00:06:47,759 --> 00:06:53,759
very typical using the RTX 490 the 7600
170
00:06:50,639 --> 00:06:57,479
was 34 faster than 5600 and that margin
171
00:06:53,759 --> 00:07:00,300
was reduced to 20 with the 6950 XT as
172
00:06:57,479 --> 00:07:03,479
the 7600 became GPU limited then with
173
00:07:00,300 --> 00:07:05,940
the 6650 xtl3 CPUs are heavily GPU
174
00:07:03,479 --> 00:07:07,259
Limited at around 110 FPS which
175
00:07:05,940 --> 00:07:10,500
admittedly is more than enough
176
00:07:07,259 --> 00:07:12,660
performance to fully enjoy this title
177
00:07:10,500 --> 00:07:14,340
scaling in Horizon zero Dawn is very
178
00:07:12,660 --> 00:07:17,220
similar to that of shadow of the Tomb
179
00:07:14,340 --> 00:07:21,060
Raider the 7600 was 24 fast using the
180
00:07:17,220 --> 00:07:22,800
RTX 4090 and 23 faster with the 6950 XT
181
00:07:21,060 --> 00:07:25,919
so a clear performance Advantage here
182
00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:28,500
for the newer zn4 processor but by the
183
00:07:25,919 --> 00:07:30,900
time we get down to the 6650 XT the
184
00:07:28,500 --> 00:07:32,520
results are entirely GPU limited with
185
00:07:30,900 --> 00:07:34,199
less than a five percent performance
186
00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:36,360
deviation
187
00:07:34,199 --> 00:07:39,120
the cyberpunk 2077 results are
188
00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:41,940
interesting as here the 7600 delivered
189
00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:44,280
35 more performance than the 5600 using
190
00:07:41,940 --> 00:07:45,900
the RTX 4090 so a massive performance
191
00:07:44,280 --> 00:07:48,780
Advantage here for the newer Zen 4
192
00:07:45,900 --> 00:07:51,419
processor however switching to the 6950
193
00:07:48,780 --> 00:07:53,160
XT reduces that margin of 14 as the
194
00:07:51,419 --> 00:07:56,220
Radeon GPU improves upon the performance
195
00:07:53,160 --> 00:07:58,860
of the 5600 by a 12 margin while the
196
00:07:56,220 --> 00:08:01,199
7600 is now GPU limited reducing the
197
00:07:58,860 --> 00:08:03,240
performance there by five percent then
198
00:08:01,199 --> 00:08:05,880
as you'd expect we're GPU limited using
199
00:08:03,240 --> 00:08:09,419
the 6950 XT and this saw all CPUs
200
00:08:05,880 --> 00:08:12,180
delivering around 95 to 96 FPS
201
00:08:09,419 --> 00:08:15,060
the ACC results are all heavily CPU
202
00:08:12,180 --> 00:08:17,880
limited regardless of the GPU used using
203
00:08:15,060 --> 00:08:21,120
the Radeon gpus the 7600 was 35 faster
204
00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:25,319
the 5600 and quite oddly that margin was
205
00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:27,840
reduced to 28 with the RTX 4090 still at
206
00:08:25,319 --> 00:08:30,300
around 30 faster than the 5600 the
207
00:08:27,840 --> 00:08:32,580
newest N4 processor is offering massive
208
00:08:30,300 --> 00:08:33,899
performance gains in this title
209
00:08:32,580 --> 00:08:35,700
the second last game we're going to look
210
00:08:33,899 --> 00:08:37,919
at is the rift breaker and this one
211
00:08:35,700 --> 00:08:40,380
doesn't require massive frame rates so
212
00:08:37,919 --> 00:08:41,880
any of these CPUs will work fine but
213
00:08:40,380 --> 00:08:43,919
we're using this more as a tool to
214
00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:47,580
measure performance and we find the 7600
215
00:08:43,919 --> 00:08:50,339
is 40 faster than the 5600 used in the
216
00:08:47,580 --> 00:08:53,220
RTX 4090 and then 22 faster with the
217
00:08:50,339 --> 00:08:56,880
6950 XT before the data becomes entirely
218
00:08:53,220 --> 00:08:58,860
GPU limited with the 6650xt
219
00:08:56,880 --> 00:09:00,779
last up we have Counter-Strike Global
220
00:08:58,860 --> 00:09:03,360
offense even like ACC this is another
221
00:09:00,779 --> 00:09:06,360
game that's heavily CPU limited and as a
222
00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:09,000
result the 7600 was between 26 and 28
223
00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:12,600
faster than the 5600 across the board
224
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:14,160
even when using the 6650 XT
225
00:09:12,600 --> 00:09:17,100
now here's a look at the 12-game average
226
00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:20,100
using the RTX 4090 we see the 7600 was
227
00:09:17,100 --> 00:09:22,860
on average 35 faster than 5600 though
228
00:09:20,100 --> 00:09:25,740
that margin is reduced to 23 with the
229
00:09:22,860 --> 00:09:28,680
6950 XT it's interesting to note that
230
00:09:25,740 --> 00:09:31,620
here the 5600 was faster using the 6950
231
00:09:28,680 --> 00:09:34,019
XT opposed to the RTX 4090 while the
232
00:09:31,620 --> 00:09:36,120
opposite is true of the 7600 and again
233
00:09:34,019 --> 00:09:38,160
this is due to nvidia's driver overhead
234
00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:40,800
issue which hurts C performance when
235
00:09:38,160 --> 00:09:43,080
utilization is high then we see thanks
236
00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:45,839
to heavily CPU limited titles such as CS
237
00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:48,600
go and ACC the 7600 is still seven
238
00:09:45,839 --> 00:09:50,640
percent faster on average using the 6650
239
00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:52,080
XT though this isn't necessarily the
240
00:09:50,640 --> 00:09:55,140
kind of margin that would get you to
241
00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:57,420
invest in Zen 4. there's no denying that
242
00:09:55,140 --> 00:10:00,180
the ryzen 5 7600 is much more powerful
243
00:09:57,420 --> 00:10:01,880
than the 5600 just is it's typically
244
00:10:00,180 --> 00:10:04,860
improved gaming performance by around 30
245
00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:07,740
but often much more than that especially
246
00:10:04,860 --> 00:10:09,720
when heavily CPU limited you also don't
247
00:10:07,740 --> 00:10:11,940
always need an extreme GPU such as the
248
00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:15,000
RTX 490 to see the difference the
249
00:10:11,940 --> 00:10:16,920
upgrade from the 5600 to the 7600 could
250
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:18,959
certainly be justified with a much more
251
00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:20,279
affordable graphics card but at the same
252
00:10:18,959 --> 00:10:22,800
time it's not going to be all that
253
00:10:20,279 --> 00:10:25,320
beneficial for everyone in fact I'd say
254
00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:28,200
for most ryzen 5 5600 owners the upgrade
255
00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:30,000
to the 7600 is a bit pointless as I
256
00:10:28,200 --> 00:10:32,820
noted earlier the upgraded Zen four will
257
00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:36,240
cost you at least 560 us for a basic
258
00:10:32,820 --> 00:10:38,940
b650 Board of course the ryzen 5 7600
259
00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:41,519
and then 32 gigabytes of decent ddr5
260
00:10:38,940 --> 00:10:44,279
memory so a better alternative for am4
261
00:10:41,519 --> 00:10:47,700
owners looking to achieve 7 600 like
262
00:10:44,279 --> 00:10:51,000
performance is the ryzen 7 5800x3d
263
00:10:47,700 --> 00:10:53,339
currently available for 340 a roughly 40
264
00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:55,680
discount when compared to the 7600
265
00:10:53,339 --> 00:10:57,360
upgrade for again basically the same
266
00:10:55,680 --> 00:10:59,279
level of performance
267
00:10:57,360 --> 00:11:01,320
however if you're a new system builder
268
00:10:59,279 --> 00:11:03,240
tossing up between these two CPUs the
269
00:11:01,320 --> 00:11:05,579
choice is a lot more difficult well
270
00:11:03,240 --> 00:11:06,839
maybe it's not obviously if you want to
271
00:11:05,579 --> 00:11:09,060
spend as little money as possible then
272
00:11:06,839 --> 00:11:11,160
the 5600 is the way to go but if you're
273
00:11:09,060 --> 00:11:13,260
looking to maximize your investment the
274
00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:15,959
7600 might actually be the smarter
275
00:11:13,260 --> 00:11:18,660
choice although the 7600 package costs
276
00:11:15,959 --> 00:11:20,579
at least 53 more we did see on average
277
00:11:18,660 --> 00:11:22,800
30 more performance with a relatively
278
00:11:20,579 --> 00:11:25,260
high in GPU so a good performance uplift
279
00:11:22,800 --> 00:11:28,440
there and further adding to the value of
280
00:11:25,260 --> 00:11:31,260
the 7600 is the am5 platform which will
281
00:11:28,440 --> 00:11:34,440
support future CPUs meaning the cheap
282
00:11:31,260 --> 00:11:36,480
and easy 5800x 3d upgrade situation 5600
283
00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:38,519
owners can take advantage of or those
284
00:11:36,480 --> 00:11:40,320
with much older am4 processes for that
285
00:11:38,519 --> 00:11:42,899
matter could end up being a similar
286
00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:45,240
situation for 7 600 owners in a few
287
00:11:42,899 --> 00:11:47,579
years time of course we just don't know
288
00:11:45,240 --> 00:11:49,740
how the am5 story will play out but we
289
00:11:47,579 --> 00:11:52,680
know how the am4 story has played out
290
00:11:49,740 --> 00:11:54,360
and that story has now ended in my
291
00:11:52,680 --> 00:11:57,300
opinion there's really no wrong or right
292
00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:59,160
choice here both are very viable the 56
293
00:11:57,300 --> 00:12:01,019
hundred it's still perfectly capable
294
00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:03,480
when it comes to gaming especially if
295
00:12:01,019 --> 00:12:05,339
you're using more modest GPU and you
296
00:12:03,480 --> 00:12:07,680
tend to mostly play single player titles
297
00:12:05,339 --> 00:12:09,600
but even then it is still very capable
298
00:12:07,680 --> 00:12:12,600
as a competitive sort of multiplayer
299
00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:14,279
gaming CPU but of course the 7600 will
300
00:12:12,600 --> 00:12:16,500
generally take performance to the next
301
00:12:14,279 --> 00:12:18,480
level so really it is up to you to
302
00:12:16,500 --> 00:12:20,640
decide which of these options is best
303
00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:23,100
for you and with that I'm going to end
304
00:12:20,640 --> 00:12:24,600
this video here hope you liked it do one
305
00:12:23,100 --> 00:12:26,459
of those if you did you can also
306
00:12:24,600 --> 00:12:28,800
subscribe for more content we have float
307
00:12:26,459 --> 00:12:30,480
plane or patreon either of those help
308
00:12:28,800 --> 00:12:32,399
support the channel and give you access
309
00:12:30,480 --> 00:12:33,660
to some pretty cool perks we do a
310
00:12:32,399 --> 00:12:35,160
monthly live stream team and I get
311
00:12:33,660 --> 00:12:38,040
together and do that answer your
312
00:12:35,160 --> 00:12:39,660
questions live q a Discord server rather
313
00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:41,220
where we well we have q a stuff there as
314
00:12:39,660 --> 00:12:42,959
well but Discord server where you can
315
00:12:41,220 --> 00:12:44,940
ask questions Tim and I are active there
316
00:12:42,959 --> 00:12:46,620
q and A's behind the scenes content a
317
00:12:44,940 --> 00:12:48,300
lot of cool stuff so if you're
318
00:12:46,620 --> 00:12:50,160
interested check out patreon float plane
319
00:12:48,300 --> 00:12:51,060
but if not that is perfectly fine and I
320
00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:53,040
would like to thank you for watching
321
00:12:51,060 --> 00:12:55,459
this video let me know Steve see you
322
00:12:53,040 --> 00:12:55,459
next time
323
00:12:56,370 --> 00:13:08,000
[Music]
324
00:13:05,000 --> 00:13:08,000
thank you
325
00:13:08,330 --> 00:13:11,379
[Music]
24584
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.