All language subtitles for Video editing WITHOUT dGPU, is it POSSIBLE_ ⚡ i9 11900k vs Ryzen 7 5700g-en

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,920 so intel versus amd but with a twist 1 00:00:04,080 --> 00:00:08,480 neither of these systems have a 2 00:00:05,920 --> 00:00:11,200 dedicated gpu both of them are running 3 00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:13,280 just the integrated graphics on the cpu 4 00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:15,920 now both of these teams have the best 5 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:20,640 what they can offer on this side the 8 6 00:00:15,920 --> 00:00:24,880 core ryzen 7 5700 g and on this one the 7 00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:26,640 core i9 11 900k also eight car chip what 8 00:00:24,880 --> 00:00:29,119 i want to know is as a creator would it 9 00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:31,199 be possible to edit some of the video 10 00:00:29,119 --> 00:00:33,200 without the dedicated graphics card on 11 00:00:31,199 --> 00:00:34,640 premiere pro for example you know just 12 00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:37,120 while you're waiting for your graphics 13 00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:40,190 card to arrive well let's find out 14 00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:40,190 [Music] 15 00:00:40,719 --> 00:00:44,559 the intel is called like the best gaming 16 00:00:42,559 --> 00:00:46,320 chip whereas this one is just like 17 00:00:44,559 --> 00:00:48,239 somewhere in the middle the intro also 18 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:50,239 cost quite a bit more i think it's 19 00:00:48,239 --> 00:00:51,840 important to mention the test bench 20 00:00:50,239 --> 00:00:54,480 setup so both of them are kind of like 21 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:56,559 open air test bench setups but we're 22 00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:58,480 both running the same ram with the same 23 00:00:56,559 --> 00:01:01,520 speed of ram the only thing i've changed 24 00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:03,920 with the amd's cpu configuration on bios 25 00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:05,519 is enabled position boost overdrive just 26 00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:07,920 to push a little bit more power through 27 00:01:05,519 --> 00:01:10,720 because it's only 65 watt chip whereas 28 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:13,680 the intel is 125 watt and intel actually 29 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:15,520 does it kind of on stock settings but 30 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:17,840 pushes so much more power through the 31 00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:20,240 chip that it's rated so we just enabled 32 00:01:17,840 --> 00:01:23,119 that on amd as well so premiere pro is 33 00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:25,920 open both of these premiere pro things 34 00:01:23,119 --> 00:01:28,000 are exactly the same projects as you can 35 00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:30,560 see now if you want to just make sure 36 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:33,280 which one is which then if you look like 37 00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:36,320 on the top of the premiere pro over here 38 00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:39,119 you can see amd ryzen as one of them and 39 00:01:36,320 --> 00:01:41,600 then on this side we have intel so you 40 00:01:39,119 --> 00:01:43,759 know like which pc is which and which 41 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:46,479 one are we using so let's start with 42 00:01:43,759 --> 00:01:50,000 intel so this is eleven nine hundred k 43 00:01:46,479 --> 00:01:51,920 so this is um eight bit four to zero 60 44 00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:53,439 frames per second 4k 45 00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:55,680 clip and if you're looking at this 46 00:01:53,439 --> 00:01:57,759 timeline performance 47 00:01:55,680 --> 00:02:00,399 i mean this is very very good this is 48 00:01:57,759 --> 00:02:02,719 hardware accelerated so the actual 49 00:02:00,399 --> 00:02:04,399 graphics is playing this back but when 50 00:02:02,719 --> 00:02:06,240 we're pressing play 51 00:02:04,399 --> 00:02:08,239 10 frames we dropped 10 frames let's 52 00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:10,399 press play again yeah it starts a little 53 00:02:08,239 --> 00:02:13,200 bit to drop frames but then keeps 54 00:02:10,399 --> 00:02:17,520 playing like the rest of the system so 55 00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:20,000 if we look at what's used the gpu is 56 00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:21,920 eighty percent used over here as you can 57 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:24,319 see this is completely 58 00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:26,800 edible editable this is completely 59 00:02:24,319 --> 00:02:29,200 editable of codec over here if you're 60 00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:31,120 using like 8-bit 4k footage and this is 61 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:32,480 full resolution if we put it to half 62 00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:34,480 resolution 63 00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:36,480 i mean check this out this is buttery 64 00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:40,239 buttery but buttery smooth absolutely no 65 00:02:36,480 --> 00:02:43,040 problem as you can see 66 00:02:40,239 --> 00:02:44,640 this is not very good when moving around 67 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:45,760 on the timeline 68 00:02:44,640 --> 00:02:49,200 it's not 69 00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:52,080 quite as smooth as intel really i would 70 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:54,400 say but still i think it's all right if 71 00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:56,080 you press play 72 00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:58,959 we're doing the same drop in a few 73 00:02:56,080 --> 00:03:00,640 frames but a little bit less than intel 74 00:02:58,959 --> 00:03:03,040 let's have a look at over here and the 75 00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:06,239 graphics is less used it looks like the 76 00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:08,640 graphics has more power and oomph to it 77 00:03:06,239 --> 00:03:10,640 but maybe probably the intel quick sync 78 00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:13,920 works better on premiere pro than on the 79 00:03:10,640 --> 00:03:15,599 amd verizon on on this particular codec 80 00:03:13,920 --> 00:03:16,480 now actually when it's loaded a little 81 00:03:15,599 --> 00:03:18,640 bit 82 00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:20,879 to be honest it's quite smooth actually 83 00:03:18,640 --> 00:03:23,280 yeah i think intel's like producing more 84 00:03:20,879 --> 00:03:25,680 frames on the timeline but both of them 85 00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:26,480 are pretty pretty smooth and like able 86 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:30,720 to 87 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:32,400 play this back so 8-bit 4-0 kodak 4k 88 00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:34,879 both of them are pretty good but i think 89 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:38,560 intel has a little bit of an edge let's 90 00:03:34,879 --> 00:03:41,200 move on to this is 10 bit 420 so the bit 91 00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:44,640 depth has changed a little bit it's 92 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:46,480 still um h264 so not high efficiency 93 00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:48,799 codec 94 00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:51,200 okay let's press play over here looks 95 00:03:48,799 --> 00:03:53,360 like it's playing it back quite 96 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:55,599 easily here as you can see the memory 97 00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:58,640 usage goes up quite a bit because our 98 00:03:55,599 --> 00:04:00,720 memory is actually using the gpu memory 99 00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:03,360 and it's using the actual system memory 100 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:05,599 as well so the memories using both job 101 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:07,280 let's move on to intel let's do exactly 102 00:04:05,599 --> 00:04:09,280 the same thing over here 103 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:11,360 yeah i think the quick sync is 104 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:13,439 truly like a bit quicker 105 00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:16,000 there's a little bit like artifacts when 106 00:04:13,439 --> 00:04:18,400 when playing around with intel it makes 107 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:20,239 some kind of weird squares i'm not sure 108 00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:22,560 if you can see that on the screen but if 109 00:04:20,239 --> 00:04:25,520 you press play 33 110 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:27,919 used infographics i think both of these 111 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:30,639 are actually very very similar like the 112 00:04:27,919 --> 00:04:33,199 timeline moving on the header is i think 113 00:04:30,639 --> 00:04:35,840 a little bit like snappier on intel just 114 00:04:33,199 --> 00:04:37,840 because of the quick sync system how 115 00:04:35,840 --> 00:04:40,639 they've utilized the hardware over there 116 00:04:37,840 --> 00:04:43,040 and that's better so i think a little 117 00:04:40,639 --> 00:04:46,000 bit of an edge here to intel as well 118 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:50,160 let's move on to four to two so now this 119 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:51,280 is completely cpu bound codec so if we 120 00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:53,199 press 121 00:04:51,280 --> 00:04:56,000 this play now here 122 00:04:53,199 --> 00:04:59,199 as you can see our gpu is not doing as 123 00:04:56,000 --> 00:05:01,440 much and our cpu here boom should be 124 00:04:59,199 --> 00:05:03,199 doing quite a bit as you can see 40. 125 00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:04,720 obviously the gpu is still like playing 126 00:05:03,199 --> 00:05:07,120 it back but as you can see the video 127 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:09,600 decoding like on here it's just playing 128 00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:11,680 it back but here the 422 129 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:13,360 we're dropping one frame 130 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:16,080 doing exactly the same 131 00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:16,080 four two two 132 00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:20,800 it's like all right not bad actually 133 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:22,880 full resolution zero frames dropped 134 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:26,639 let's have a look at the 135 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:28,320 cpu is utilized about 30 percent it's 136 00:05:26,639 --> 00:05:30,639 it's all right looks like it's playing 137 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:32,320 it back no problem timeline performance 138 00:05:30,639 --> 00:05:36,160 actually is quite all right as well 139 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:39,160 timeline is a bit choppy as well 140 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:39,160 but 141 00:05:39,759 --> 00:05:45,520 i think they're both equal on this one 142 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:47,600 let's try um 4 to 260 frames per second 143 00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:49,600 as well so this is a little bit more 144 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:51,680 just a lot more frames 145 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:53,520 yeah intel is dropping constantly 146 00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:56,960 footage over here 147 00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:58,720 frames the gpu is completely maxed out 148 00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:01,199 cpu is like 149 00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:02,800 almost there pressing play over here 150 00:06:01,199 --> 00:06:05,360 full resolution 151 00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:06,560 17 frame dropped both of the drop in 152 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:09,280 frames 153 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:12,479 let's see which drops more frames looks 154 00:06:09,280 --> 00:06:15,199 like amd gpu actually has more overhead 155 00:06:12,479 --> 00:06:17,199 headroom because it's utilized less but 156 00:06:15,199 --> 00:06:19,680 just the drivers and i think how adobe 157 00:06:17,199 --> 00:06:21,680 is working there's a better like driver 158 00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:24,080 support than just hardware support on 159 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:27,759 intel than on amd because as you can see 160 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:31,440 intel gpu is like 100 utilized and cpu 161 00:06:27,759 --> 00:06:34,560 is about 80 90 utilized and over this 162 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:37,440 timeline we dropped 142 frames let's 163 00:06:34,560 --> 00:06:41,919 have a look at amd look there was about 164 00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:45,919 maybe 40 utilized and 70 to 80 utilized 165 00:06:41,919 --> 00:06:47,680 so much less utilized and 270 frames 166 00:06:45,919 --> 00:06:49,199 dropped just a little conclusion on the 167 00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:51,440 side over here if you have mirrorless 168 00:06:49,199 --> 00:06:54,479 footage like from any of the cameras 169 00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:56,080 10-bit 8-bit 4k whatever frame rates 170 00:06:54,479 --> 00:06:58,400 then the intel one actually because of 171 00:06:56,080 --> 00:07:00,479 the quick sync on adobe premiere pro has 172 00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:02,800 an edge over here let's move on to a 173 00:07:00,479 --> 00:07:05,599 little bit more complex codecs we have 174 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:08,639 the redraw 4k okay this is full 175 00:07:05,599 --> 00:07:10,880 resolution let's have a look how well 176 00:07:08,639 --> 00:07:13,680 does this work over here 177 00:07:10,880 --> 00:07:15,199 wow okay this is very very smooth look 178 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:18,400 at this 179 00:07:15,199 --> 00:07:20,160 this is smooth as anything 180 00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:22,479 so i'm just gonna press play over here 181 00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:25,680 because that's very smooth let's see on 182 00:07:22,479 --> 00:07:25,680 in the intel system 183 00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:31,520 i don't know if you can notice this but 184 00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:33,680 on here 185 00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:35,520 the amd was very like smooth on the 186 00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:37,840 playback whereas the intel is some kind 187 00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:39,680 of like there's like artifacts over here 188 00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:41,919 when it's when it's playing back and 189 00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:45,039 it's it's smooth but it there is some 190 00:07:41,919 --> 00:07:48,000 artifacts so let's press play and see 191 00:07:45,039 --> 00:07:48,960 if it can play it back okay amd finished 192 00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:51,039 now 193 00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:53,840 and we dropped two frames so basically 194 00:07:51,039 --> 00:07:54,560 no frames this could have been like just 195 00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:58,000 an 196 00:07:54,560 --> 00:08:00,639 error you know and how many whoa whoa 197 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:02,879 okay intel now dropped 209 frames 198 00:08:00,639 --> 00:08:04,000 compared to basically no frames on the 199 00:08:02,879 --> 00:08:06,240 amd 200 00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:09,360 so when we're comparing red footage the 201 00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:12,879 amd has a much better edge than intel 202 00:08:09,360 --> 00:08:14,160 over here let's move on to canon c200 203 00:08:12,879 --> 00:08:16,160 and we're gonna 204 00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:17,520 put this on like half 205 00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:19,440 resolution 206 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:21,120 half the resolution and 207 00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,680 it's quite smooth but there's quite a 208 00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:25,759 lot of artifacts as well it looks like 209 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:27,759 like some random glitches and stuff are 210 00:08:25,759 --> 00:08:30,160 going on happening over there so it's 211 00:08:27,759 --> 00:08:32,800 playing back actually not bad on half 212 00:08:30,160 --> 00:08:34,320 the resolution let's move on to the amd 213 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:36,000 system over here 214 00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:39,320 let's have a look at this as well so 215 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:39,320 half the resolution 216 00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:44,480 okay this is interesting 217 00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:47,279 so what i can notice over here is that 218 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:48,959 amd has less artifacts actually 219 00:08:47,279 --> 00:08:50,880 so the amd system what i'm scrolling 220 00:08:48,959 --> 00:08:53,600 through is is 221 00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:55,839 as smooth as intel's but it doesn't have 222 00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:57,600 as much artifact so i would say like the 223 00:08:55,839 --> 00:09:00,399 timeline performance is a little bit 224 00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:02,399 better over here so let me just press 225 00:09:00,399 --> 00:09:04,560 play somewhere over here and let's see 226 00:09:02,399 --> 00:09:06,320 what happens 227 00:09:04,560 --> 00:09:08,399 seems like it's playing it back no 228 00:09:06,320 --> 00:09:10,240 problem let's move back to the intel 229 00:09:08,399 --> 00:09:11,519 system intel system here is still 230 00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:13,440 playing it back but as you can see 231 00:09:11,519 --> 00:09:15,279 there's like artifacts there's like some 232 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:17,440 kind of stripes and things going through 233 00:09:15,279 --> 00:09:18,959 it doesn't look as good over here so 234 00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:20,399 yeah both of them are equal but i'd 235 00:09:18,959 --> 00:09:22,480 still give a little bit of an edge to 236 00:09:20,399 --> 00:09:25,600 the ryzen system just because of the 237 00:09:22,480 --> 00:09:29,040 less artifacts and it just feels like 238 00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:33,040 it's it's a bit better red 5k now okay 239 00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:35,519 full resolution 5k footage 240 00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:37,279 timeline it's all right but it's hard to 241 00:09:35,519 --> 00:09:38,399 know here because there's not a lot of 242 00:09:37,279 --> 00:09:40,000 movement so what we're going to do is 243 00:09:38,399 --> 00:09:42,480 we're going to press play and see how 244 00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:44,560 many frames we're dropping i mean looks 245 00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:45,920 like it's a bit more choppier on the 246 00:09:44,560 --> 00:09:48,880 intel system 247 00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:51,360 but let's just press play see what 248 00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:55,040 happens on the amd system 249 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:57,440 we dropped 185 frames we understand a 5k 250 00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:59,120 is already a little bit difficult it 251 00:09:57,440 --> 00:10:01,200 looks like the cpu was the bottleneck 252 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:02,959 over here as you can see eight cars just 253 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:05,279 isn't quite enough to 254 00:10:02,959 --> 00:10:07,279 start playing back 5k footage and then 255 00:10:05,279 --> 00:10:11,279 on the intel we 256 00:10:07,279 --> 00:10:13,200 have lost 228 so intel did even even 257 00:10:11,279 --> 00:10:16,480 worse so if you look here 258 00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:19,440 intel had like gpu and cpu maxed out so 259 00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:21,519 let's move on to red 6k kodak 260 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:23,120 let's see if there's any difference over 261 00:10:21,519 --> 00:10:25,839 here i mean check this intel's 262 00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:29,680 constantly pulling like 183 263 00:10:25,839 --> 00:10:33,839 85 190 watts to play this back 264 00:10:29,680 --> 00:10:35,920 let's move on to 6k whoa 265 00:10:33,839 --> 00:10:37,440 check the timeline performance here on 266 00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:41,600 ryzen system 267 00:10:37,440 --> 00:10:41,600 this is completely acceptable 268 00:10:41,680 --> 00:10:45,200 so if you press play let's see what 269 00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:47,839 happens but that was very very 270 00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:50,079 interesting so we're pressing play 271 00:10:47,839 --> 00:10:51,680 look the ryzen system is pulling less 272 00:10:50,079 --> 00:10:56,399 than half of the 273 00:10:51,680 --> 00:10:58,959 about 70 to 80 watts of power 274 00:10:56,399 --> 00:11:00,560 and the cpu was the bottleneck over here 275 00:10:58,959 --> 00:11:03,560 let's have a look what happened on the 276 00:11:00,560 --> 00:11:06,680 intel system we dropped 277 00:11:03,560 --> 00:11:09,519 2415 frames amd dropped 278 00:11:06,680 --> 00:11:12,000 230 frames that's interesting so let's 279 00:11:09,519 --> 00:11:13,839 go to b raw 6k which is quite an easy 280 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:15,680 codec to edit we're looking at the 281 00:11:13,839 --> 00:11:18,399 timeline performance over here intel has 282 00:11:15,680 --> 00:11:20,480 some artifacts going on 283 00:11:18,399 --> 00:11:22,880 but looks like 284 00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:25,360 you could do some b-raw editing over 285 00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:26,560 here that's no problem okay see the 286 00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:29,440 similar thing 287 00:11:26,560 --> 00:11:31,600 like when moving around the timeline amd 288 00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:34,320 funnily enough even though 289 00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:35,680 it maybe produces slightly less frames 290 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:37,680 on the scrubbing 291 00:11:35,680 --> 00:11:39,360 it is smooth and it's not as distracting 292 00:11:37,680 --> 00:11:41,360 seeing some kind of artifacts on the 293 00:11:39,360 --> 00:11:43,760 timeline because for me as an editor it 294 00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:45,839 would make me feel like whoa is is the 295 00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:48,240 footage like shot weird is there some 296 00:11:45,839 --> 00:11:49,920 corruption of the files what's going on 297 00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:51,519 over there on the intel system but in 298 00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:53,279 here i know okay it's been shot very 299 00:11:51,519 --> 00:11:54,240 good let's press play let's see what 300 00:11:53,279 --> 00:11:58,000 happens 301 00:11:54,240 --> 00:12:00,240 full resolution like full 8 6k timeline 302 00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:01,839 playback over here 103 frames dropped 303 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:05,279 over here what is the bottleneck 304 00:12:01,839 --> 00:12:06,959 probably the gpu over here 305 00:12:05,279 --> 00:12:08,120 a lot of memories being used here as 306 00:12:06,959 --> 00:12:11,519 well 307 00:12:08,120 --> 00:12:13,760 121 frames dropped whoa until still 308 00:12:11,519 --> 00:12:16,000 actually won on this 309 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:17,279 for some reason amd can't just play it 310 00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:19,200 back even though there's much more 311 00:12:17,279 --> 00:12:21,200 headroom as you can see the gpu over 312 00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:22,880 here it's still dropping a lot more 313 00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:26,240 frames than 314 00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:29,120 intel 256 so we'll still have to give 315 00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:31,200 intel the lead on this one so might as 316 00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:33,839 well just try something ridiculous this 317 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:35,839 is canon r5 8k and we're going to start 318 00:12:33,839 --> 00:12:38,720 quarter resolution because there's no 319 00:12:35,839 --> 00:12:40,000 point even trying a full resolution 320 00:12:38,720 --> 00:12:42,800 but this 321 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:44,720 yo this is absolutely smooth but there's 322 00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:46,320 still some artifacts going on like some 323 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:47,920 weird stripes 324 00:12:46,320 --> 00:12:49,760 like some blocking or whatever it's 325 00:12:47,920 --> 00:12:52,639 called i'm just gonna press play because 326 00:12:49,760 --> 00:12:54,560 that was pretty impressive okay that is 327 00:12:52,639 --> 00:12:56,000 smooth and i would say 328 00:12:54,560 --> 00:12:58,480 this is better 329 00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:00,480 on much better than amd just because 330 00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:02,320 there's less artifacts the artifacts on 331 00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:04,480 intel is really really annoying so 332 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:07,279 intel's almost finished this sequence 333 00:13:04,480 --> 00:13:09,440 and intel has actually dropped two 334 00:13:07,279 --> 00:13:11,200 frames during this playback which is 335 00:13:09,440 --> 00:13:14,320 very interesting so you can definitely 336 00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:18,800 edit some even r5 footage if you don't 337 00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:21,519 have a gpu on the intel 11 900k so amd 338 00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:23,279 at the moment is dropping zero frames 339 00:13:21,519 --> 00:13:25,920 zero frames dropped i think we're gonna 340 00:13:23,279 --> 00:13:28,240 have to give this to the amd system i 341 00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:30,959 think red raw 8k and 12k there's no 342 00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:33,200 point in testing these because like 343 00:13:30,959 --> 00:13:34,720 if you're editing these types of footage 344 00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:35,519 you probably have the cash to actually 345 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:37,600 buy a 346 00:13:35,519 --> 00:13:39,680 dedicated gpu as well so there's no 347 00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:41,519 point in actually trying that so the 348 00:13:39,680 --> 00:13:44,399 conclusion is this 349 00:13:41,519 --> 00:13:46,720 both of these chips can actually edit 350 00:13:44,399 --> 00:13:49,760 some of the mirrorless camera footage 351 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:53,040 like 4k 60 frames per second up to there 352 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:56,079 402 or 420 gpu accelerated not both of 353 00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:57,600 them can actually do but intel has an 354 00:13:56,079 --> 00:14:00,639 edge over there just because of the 355 00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:03,279 quick sync support on the premiere pro 356 00:14:00,639 --> 00:14:05,040 and how it utilizes this igpu inside 357 00:14:03,279 --> 00:14:06,399 there it is better it's smoother 358 00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:09,440 experience there might be a little bit 359 00:14:06,399 --> 00:14:12,079 more arty effects but that's that now 360 00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:14,399 the interesting thing here is that amd 361 00:14:12,079 --> 00:14:16,639 actually has quite a lot more overhead 362 00:14:14,399 --> 00:14:19,360 in terms of the upgrade ability because 363 00:14:16,639 --> 00:14:22,000 this one is as good as it gets on intel 364 00:14:19,360 --> 00:14:25,279 system so if you get like another gpu 365 00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:27,440 your cpu is is that's it that's to the 366 00:14:25,279 --> 00:14:29,920 wall you can't go anywhere else whereas 367 00:14:27,440 --> 00:14:32,079 on the amd there's quite a bit of 368 00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:34,320 upgrades actually there if you get a gpu 369 00:14:32,079 --> 00:14:36,800 there and then you can actually put much 370 00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:39,040 better cpus in there ryzen 9s there's a 371 00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:41,440 few ryzen 9's over there which is 372 00:14:39,040 --> 00:14:44,079 amazing the amd also uses much less 373 00:14:41,440 --> 00:14:45,760 energy or electricity it's got a little 374 00:14:44,079 --> 00:14:47,760 bit of an edge over there if you're 375 00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:50,320 thinking about view upgrade path for 376 00:14:47,760 --> 00:14:52,560 this moment at this like point in time 377 00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:54,480 without the dedicated gpu we have to 378 00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:55,680 give the win to intel so this was 379 00:14:54,480 --> 00:14:58,000 premiere pro if you want to know what 380 00:14:55,680 --> 00:15:00,160 the difference is in resolve stay tuned 381 00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:02,480 for the next video likes if you enjoyed 382 00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:04,079 it subs if you want to see more and i'll 383 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:06,870 see in the next video thanks guys for 384 00:15:04,079 --> 00:15:11,639 watching 385 00:15:06,870 --> 00:15:11,639 [Music] 28058

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.