Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,920
so intel versus amd but with a twist
1
00:00:04,080 --> 00:00:08,480
neither of these systems have a
2
00:00:05,920 --> 00:00:11,200
dedicated gpu both of them are running
3
00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:13,280
just the integrated graphics on the cpu
4
00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:15,920
now both of these teams have the best
5
00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:20,640
what they can offer on this side the 8
6
00:00:15,920 --> 00:00:24,880
core ryzen 7 5700 g and on this one the
7
00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:26,640
core i9 11 900k also eight car chip what
8
00:00:24,880 --> 00:00:29,119
i want to know is as a creator would it
9
00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:31,199
be possible to edit some of the video
10
00:00:29,119 --> 00:00:33,200
without the dedicated graphics card on
11
00:00:31,199 --> 00:00:34,640
premiere pro for example you know just
12
00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:37,120
while you're waiting for your graphics
13
00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:40,190
card to arrive well let's find out
14
00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:40,190
[Music]
15
00:00:40,719 --> 00:00:44,559
the intel is called like the best gaming
16
00:00:42,559 --> 00:00:46,320
chip whereas this one is just like
17
00:00:44,559 --> 00:00:48,239
somewhere in the middle the intro also
18
00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:50,239
cost quite a bit more i think it's
19
00:00:48,239 --> 00:00:51,840
important to mention the test bench
20
00:00:50,239 --> 00:00:54,480
setup so both of them are kind of like
21
00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:56,559
open air test bench setups but we're
22
00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:58,480
both running the same ram with the same
23
00:00:56,559 --> 00:01:01,520
speed of ram the only thing i've changed
24
00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:03,920
with the amd's cpu configuration on bios
25
00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:05,519
is enabled position boost overdrive just
26
00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:07,920
to push a little bit more power through
27
00:01:05,519 --> 00:01:10,720
because it's only 65 watt chip whereas
28
00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:13,680
the intel is 125 watt and intel actually
29
00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:15,520
does it kind of on stock settings but
30
00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:17,840
pushes so much more power through the
31
00:01:15,520 --> 00:01:20,240
chip that it's rated so we just enabled
32
00:01:17,840 --> 00:01:23,119
that on amd as well so premiere pro is
33
00:01:20,240 --> 00:01:25,920
open both of these premiere pro things
34
00:01:23,119 --> 00:01:28,000
are exactly the same projects as you can
35
00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:30,560
see now if you want to just make sure
36
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:33,280
which one is which then if you look like
37
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:36,320
on the top of the premiere pro over here
38
00:01:33,280 --> 00:01:39,119
you can see amd ryzen as one of them and
39
00:01:36,320 --> 00:01:41,600
then on this side we have intel so you
40
00:01:39,119 --> 00:01:43,759
know like which pc is which and which
41
00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:46,479
one are we using so let's start with
42
00:01:43,759 --> 00:01:50,000
intel so this is eleven nine hundred k
43
00:01:46,479 --> 00:01:51,920
so this is um eight bit four to zero 60
44
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:53,439
frames per second 4k
45
00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:55,680
clip and if you're looking at this
46
00:01:53,439 --> 00:01:57,759
timeline performance
47
00:01:55,680 --> 00:02:00,399
i mean this is very very good this is
48
00:01:57,759 --> 00:02:02,719
hardware accelerated so the actual
49
00:02:00,399 --> 00:02:04,399
graphics is playing this back but when
50
00:02:02,719 --> 00:02:06,240
we're pressing play
51
00:02:04,399 --> 00:02:08,239
10 frames we dropped 10 frames let's
52
00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:10,399
press play again yeah it starts a little
53
00:02:08,239 --> 00:02:13,200
bit to drop frames but then keeps
54
00:02:10,399 --> 00:02:17,520
playing like the rest of the system so
55
00:02:13,200 --> 00:02:20,000
if we look at what's used the gpu is
56
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:21,920
eighty percent used over here as you can
57
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:24,319
see this is completely
58
00:02:21,920 --> 00:02:26,800
edible editable this is completely
59
00:02:24,319 --> 00:02:29,200
editable of codec over here if you're
60
00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:31,120
using like 8-bit 4k footage and this is
61
00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:32,480
full resolution if we put it to half
62
00:02:31,120 --> 00:02:34,480
resolution
63
00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:36,480
i mean check this out this is buttery
64
00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:40,239
buttery but buttery smooth absolutely no
65
00:02:36,480 --> 00:02:43,040
problem as you can see
66
00:02:40,239 --> 00:02:44,640
this is not very good when moving around
67
00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:45,760
on the timeline
68
00:02:44,640 --> 00:02:49,200
it's not
69
00:02:45,760 --> 00:02:52,080
quite as smooth as intel really i would
70
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:54,400
say but still i think it's all right if
71
00:02:52,080 --> 00:02:56,080
you press play
72
00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:58,959
we're doing the same drop in a few
73
00:02:56,080 --> 00:03:00,640
frames but a little bit less than intel
74
00:02:58,959 --> 00:03:03,040
let's have a look at over here and the
75
00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:06,239
graphics is less used it looks like the
76
00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:08,640
graphics has more power and oomph to it
77
00:03:06,239 --> 00:03:10,640
but maybe probably the intel quick sync
78
00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:13,920
works better on premiere pro than on the
79
00:03:10,640 --> 00:03:15,599
amd verizon on on this particular codec
80
00:03:13,920 --> 00:03:16,480
now actually when it's loaded a little
81
00:03:15,599 --> 00:03:18,640
bit
82
00:03:16,480 --> 00:03:20,879
to be honest it's quite smooth actually
83
00:03:18,640 --> 00:03:23,280
yeah i think intel's like producing more
84
00:03:20,879 --> 00:03:25,680
frames on the timeline but both of them
85
00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:26,480
are pretty pretty smooth and like able
86
00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:30,720
to
87
00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:32,400
play this back so 8-bit 4-0 kodak 4k
88
00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:34,879
both of them are pretty good but i think
89
00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:38,560
intel has a little bit of an edge let's
90
00:03:34,879 --> 00:03:41,200
move on to this is 10 bit 420 so the bit
91
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:44,640
depth has changed a little bit it's
92
00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:46,480
still um h264 so not high efficiency
93
00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:48,799
codec
94
00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:51,200
okay let's press play over here looks
95
00:03:48,799 --> 00:03:53,360
like it's playing it back quite
96
00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:55,599
easily here as you can see the memory
97
00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:58,640
usage goes up quite a bit because our
98
00:03:55,599 --> 00:04:00,720
memory is actually using the gpu memory
99
00:03:58,640 --> 00:04:03,360
and it's using the actual system memory
100
00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:05,599
as well so the memories using both job
101
00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:07,280
let's move on to intel let's do exactly
102
00:04:05,599 --> 00:04:09,280
the same thing over here
103
00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:11,360
yeah i think the quick sync is
104
00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:13,439
truly like a bit quicker
105
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:16,000
there's a little bit like artifacts when
106
00:04:13,439 --> 00:04:18,400
when playing around with intel it makes
107
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:20,239
some kind of weird squares i'm not sure
108
00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:22,560
if you can see that on the screen but if
109
00:04:20,239 --> 00:04:25,520
you press play 33
110
00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:27,919
used infographics i think both of these
111
00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:30,639
are actually very very similar like the
112
00:04:27,919 --> 00:04:33,199
timeline moving on the header is i think
113
00:04:30,639 --> 00:04:35,840
a little bit like snappier on intel just
114
00:04:33,199 --> 00:04:37,840
because of the quick sync system how
115
00:04:35,840 --> 00:04:40,639
they've utilized the hardware over there
116
00:04:37,840 --> 00:04:43,040
and that's better so i think a little
117
00:04:40,639 --> 00:04:46,000
bit of an edge here to intel as well
118
00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:50,160
let's move on to four to two so now this
119
00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:51,280
is completely cpu bound codec so if we
120
00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:53,199
press
121
00:04:51,280 --> 00:04:56,000
this play now here
122
00:04:53,199 --> 00:04:59,199
as you can see our gpu is not doing as
123
00:04:56,000 --> 00:05:01,440
much and our cpu here boom should be
124
00:04:59,199 --> 00:05:03,199
doing quite a bit as you can see 40.
125
00:05:01,440 --> 00:05:04,720
obviously the gpu is still like playing
126
00:05:03,199 --> 00:05:07,120
it back but as you can see the video
127
00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:09,600
decoding like on here it's just playing
128
00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:11,680
it back but here the 422
129
00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:13,360
we're dropping one frame
130
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:16,080
doing exactly the same
131
00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:16,080
four two two
132
00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:20,800
it's like all right not bad actually
133
00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:22,880
full resolution zero frames dropped
134
00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:26,639
let's have a look at the
135
00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:28,320
cpu is utilized about 30 percent it's
136
00:05:26,639 --> 00:05:30,639
it's all right looks like it's playing
137
00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:32,320
it back no problem timeline performance
138
00:05:30,639 --> 00:05:36,160
actually is quite all right as well
139
00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:39,160
timeline is a bit choppy as well
140
00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:39,160
but
141
00:05:39,759 --> 00:05:45,520
i think they're both equal on this one
142
00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:47,600
let's try um 4 to 260 frames per second
143
00:05:45,520 --> 00:05:49,600
as well so this is a little bit more
144
00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:51,680
just a lot more frames
145
00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:53,520
yeah intel is dropping constantly
146
00:05:51,680 --> 00:05:56,960
footage over here
147
00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:58,720
frames the gpu is completely maxed out
148
00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:01,199
cpu is like
149
00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:02,800
almost there pressing play over here
150
00:06:01,199 --> 00:06:05,360
full resolution
151
00:06:02,800 --> 00:06:06,560
17 frame dropped both of the drop in
152
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:09,280
frames
153
00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:12,479
let's see which drops more frames looks
154
00:06:09,280 --> 00:06:15,199
like amd gpu actually has more overhead
155
00:06:12,479 --> 00:06:17,199
headroom because it's utilized less but
156
00:06:15,199 --> 00:06:19,680
just the drivers and i think how adobe
157
00:06:17,199 --> 00:06:21,680
is working there's a better like driver
158
00:06:19,680 --> 00:06:24,080
support than just hardware support on
159
00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:27,759
intel than on amd because as you can see
160
00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:31,440
intel gpu is like 100 utilized and cpu
161
00:06:27,759 --> 00:06:34,560
is about 80 90 utilized and over this
162
00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:37,440
timeline we dropped 142 frames let's
163
00:06:34,560 --> 00:06:41,919
have a look at amd look there was about
164
00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:45,919
maybe 40 utilized and 70 to 80 utilized
165
00:06:41,919 --> 00:06:47,680
so much less utilized and 270 frames
166
00:06:45,919 --> 00:06:49,199
dropped just a little conclusion on the
167
00:06:47,680 --> 00:06:51,440
side over here if you have mirrorless
168
00:06:49,199 --> 00:06:54,479
footage like from any of the cameras
169
00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:56,080
10-bit 8-bit 4k whatever frame rates
170
00:06:54,479 --> 00:06:58,400
then the intel one actually because of
171
00:06:56,080 --> 00:07:00,479
the quick sync on adobe premiere pro has
172
00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:02,800
an edge over here let's move on to a
173
00:07:00,479 --> 00:07:05,599
little bit more complex codecs we have
174
00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:08,639
the redraw 4k okay this is full
175
00:07:05,599 --> 00:07:10,880
resolution let's have a look how well
176
00:07:08,639 --> 00:07:13,680
does this work over here
177
00:07:10,880 --> 00:07:15,199
wow okay this is very very smooth look
178
00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:18,400
at this
179
00:07:15,199 --> 00:07:20,160
this is smooth as anything
180
00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:22,479
so i'm just gonna press play over here
181
00:07:20,160 --> 00:07:25,680
because that's very smooth let's see on
182
00:07:22,479 --> 00:07:25,680
in the intel system
183
00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:31,520
i don't know if you can notice this but
184
00:07:30,080 --> 00:07:33,680
on here
185
00:07:31,520 --> 00:07:35,520
the amd was very like smooth on the
186
00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:37,840
playback whereas the intel is some kind
187
00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:39,680
of like there's like artifacts over here
188
00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:41,919
when it's when it's playing back and
189
00:07:39,680 --> 00:07:45,039
it's it's smooth but it there is some
190
00:07:41,919 --> 00:07:48,000
artifacts so let's press play and see
191
00:07:45,039 --> 00:07:48,960
if it can play it back okay amd finished
192
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:51,039
now
193
00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:53,840
and we dropped two frames so basically
194
00:07:51,039 --> 00:07:54,560
no frames this could have been like just
195
00:07:53,840 --> 00:07:58,000
an
196
00:07:54,560 --> 00:08:00,639
error you know and how many whoa whoa
197
00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:02,879
okay intel now dropped 209 frames
198
00:08:00,639 --> 00:08:04,000
compared to basically no frames on the
199
00:08:02,879 --> 00:08:06,240
amd
200
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:09,360
so when we're comparing red footage the
201
00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:12,879
amd has a much better edge than intel
202
00:08:09,360 --> 00:08:14,160
over here let's move on to canon c200
203
00:08:12,879 --> 00:08:16,160
and we're gonna
204
00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:17,520
put this on like half
205
00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:19,440
resolution
206
00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:21,120
half the resolution and
207
00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,680
it's quite smooth but there's quite a
208
00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:25,759
lot of artifacts as well it looks like
209
00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:27,759
like some random glitches and stuff are
210
00:08:25,759 --> 00:08:30,160
going on happening over there so it's
211
00:08:27,759 --> 00:08:32,800
playing back actually not bad on half
212
00:08:30,160 --> 00:08:34,320
the resolution let's move on to the amd
213
00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:36,000
system over here
214
00:08:34,320 --> 00:08:39,320
let's have a look at this as well so
215
00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:39,320
half the resolution
216
00:08:40,320 --> 00:08:44,480
okay this is interesting
217
00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:47,279
so what i can notice over here is that
218
00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:48,959
amd has less artifacts actually
219
00:08:47,279 --> 00:08:50,880
so the amd system what i'm scrolling
220
00:08:48,959 --> 00:08:53,600
through is is
221
00:08:50,880 --> 00:08:55,839
as smooth as intel's but it doesn't have
222
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:57,600
as much artifact so i would say like the
223
00:08:55,839 --> 00:09:00,399
timeline performance is a little bit
224
00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:02,399
better over here so let me just press
225
00:09:00,399 --> 00:09:04,560
play somewhere over here and let's see
226
00:09:02,399 --> 00:09:06,320
what happens
227
00:09:04,560 --> 00:09:08,399
seems like it's playing it back no
228
00:09:06,320 --> 00:09:10,240
problem let's move back to the intel
229
00:09:08,399 --> 00:09:11,519
system intel system here is still
230
00:09:10,240 --> 00:09:13,440
playing it back but as you can see
231
00:09:11,519 --> 00:09:15,279
there's like artifacts there's like some
232
00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:17,440
kind of stripes and things going through
233
00:09:15,279 --> 00:09:18,959
it doesn't look as good over here so
234
00:09:17,440 --> 00:09:20,399
yeah both of them are equal but i'd
235
00:09:18,959 --> 00:09:22,480
still give a little bit of an edge to
236
00:09:20,399 --> 00:09:25,600
the ryzen system just because of the
237
00:09:22,480 --> 00:09:29,040
less artifacts and it just feels like
238
00:09:25,600 --> 00:09:33,040
it's it's a bit better red 5k now okay
239
00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:35,519
full resolution 5k footage
240
00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:37,279
timeline it's all right but it's hard to
241
00:09:35,519 --> 00:09:38,399
know here because there's not a lot of
242
00:09:37,279 --> 00:09:40,000
movement so what we're going to do is
243
00:09:38,399 --> 00:09:42,480
we're going to press play and see how
244
00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:44,560
many frames we're dropping i mean looks
245
00:09:42,480 --> 00:09:45,920
like it's a bit more choppier on the
246
00:09:44,560 --> 00:09:48,880
intel system
247
00:09:45,920 --> 00:09:51,360
but let's just press play see what
248
00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:55,040
happens on the amd system
249
00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:57,440
we dropped 185 frames we understand a 5k
250
00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:59,120
is already a little bit difficult it
251
00:09:57,440 --> 00:10:01,200
looks like the cpu was the bottleneck
252
00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:02,959
over here as you can see eight cars just
253
00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:05,279
isn't quite enough to
254
00:10:02,959 --> 00:10:07,279
start playing back 5k footage and then
255
00:10:05,279 --> 00:10:11,279
on the intel we
256
00:10:07,279 --> 00:10:13,200
have lost 228 so intel did even even
257
00:10:11,279 --> 00:10:16,480
worse so if you look here
258
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:19,440
intel had like gpu and cpu maxed out so
259
00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:21,519
let's move on to red 6k kodak
260
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:23,120
let's see if there's any difference over
261
00:10:21,519 --> 00:10:25,839
here i mean check this intel's
262
00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:29,680
constantly pulling like 183
263
00:10:25,839 --> 00:10:33,839
85 190 watts to play this back
264
00:10:29,680 --> 00:10:35,920
let's move on to 6k whoa
265
00:10:33,839 --> 00:10:37,440
check the timeline performance here on
266
00:10:35,920 --> 00:10:41,600
ryzen system
267
00:10:37,440 --> 00:10:41,600
this is completely acceptable
268
00:10:41,680 --> 00:10:45,200
so if you press play let's see what
269
00:10:43,040 --> 00:10:47,839
happens but that was very very
270
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:50,079
interesting so we're pressing play
271
00:10:47,839 --> 00:10:51,680
look the ryzen system is pulling less
272
00:10:50,079 --> 00:10:56,399
than half of the
273
00:10:51,680 --> 00:10:58,959
about 70 to 80 watts of power
274
00:10:56,399 --> 00:11:00,560
and the cpu was the bottleneck over here
275
00:10:58,959 --> 00:11:03,560
let's have a look what happened on the
276
00:11:00,560 --> 00:11:06,680
intel system we dropped
277
00:11:03,560 --> 00:11:09,519
2415 frames amd dropped
278
00:11:06,680 --> 00:11:12,000
230 frames that's interesting so let's
279
00:11:09,519 --> 00:11:13,839
go to b raw 6k which is quite an easy
280
00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:15,680
codec to edit we're looking at the
281
00:11:13,839 --> 00:11:18,399
timeline performance over here intel has
282
00:11:15,680 --> 00:11:20,480
some artifacts going on
283
00:11:18,399 --> 00:11:22,880
but looks like
284
00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:25,360
you could do some b-raw editing over
285
00:11:22,880 --> 00:11:26,560
here that's no problem okay see the
286
00:11:25,360 --> 00:11:29,440
similar thing
287
00:11:26,560 --> 00:11:31,600
like when moving around the timeline amd
288
00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:34,320
funnily enough even though
289
00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:35,680
it maybe produces slightly less frames
290
00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:37,680
on the scrubbing
291
00:11:35,680 --> 00:11:39,360
it is smooth and it's not as distracting
292
00:11:37,680 --> 00:11:41,360
seeing some kind of artifacts on the
293
00:11:39,360 --> 00:11:43,760
timeline because for me as an editor it
294
00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:45,839
would make me feel like whoa is is the
295
00:11:43,760 --> 00:11:48,240
footage like shot weird is there some
296
00:11:45,839 --> 00:11:49,920
corruption of the files what's going on
297
00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:51,519
over there on the intel system but in
298
00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:53,279
here i know okay it's been shot very
299
00:11:51,519 --> 00:11:54,240
good let's press play let's see what
300
00:11:53,279 --> 00:11:58,000
happens
301
00:11:54,240 --> 00:12:00,240
full resolution like full 8 6k timeline
302
00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:01,839
playback over here 103 frames dropped
303
00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:05,279
over here what is the bottleneck
304
00:12:01,839 --> 00:12:06,959
probably the gpu over here
305
00:12:05,279 --> 00:12:08,120
a lot of memories being used here as
306
00:12:06,959 --> 00:12:11,519
well
307
00:12:08,120 --> 00:12:13,760
121 frames dropped whoa until still
308
00:12:11,519 --> 00:12:16,000
actually won on this
309
00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:17,279
for some reason amd can't just play it
310
00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:19,200
back even though there's much more
311
00:12:17,279 --> 00:12:21,200
headroom as you can see the gpu over
312
00:12:19,200 --> 00:12:22,880
here it's still dropping a lot more
313
00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:26,240
frames than
314
00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:29,120
intel 256 so we'll still have to give
315
00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:31,200
intel the lead on this one so might as
316
00:12:29,120 --> 00:12:33,839
well just try something ridiculous this
317
00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:35,839
is canon r5 8k and we're going to start
318
00:12:33,839 --> 00:12:38,720
quarter resolution because there's no
319
00:12:35,839 --> 00:12:40,000
point even trying a full resolution
320
00:12:38,720 --> 00:12:42,800
but this
321
00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:44,720
yo this is absolutely smooth but there's
322
00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:46,320
still some artifacts going on like some
323
00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:47,920
weird stripes
324
00:12:46,320 --> 00:12:49,760
like some blocking or whatever it's
325
00:12:47,920 --> 00:12:52,639
called i'm just gonna press play because
326
00:12:49,760 --> 00:12:54,560
that was pretty impressive okay that is
327
00:12:52,639 --> 00:12:56,000
smooth and i would say
328
00:12:54,560 --> 00:12:58,480
this is better
329
00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:00,480
on much better than amd just because
330
00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:02,320
there's less artifacts the artifacts on
331
00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:04,480
intel is really really annoying so
332
00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:07,279
intel's almost finished this sequence
333
00:13:04,480 --> 00:13:09,440
and intel has actually dropped two
334
00:13:07,279 --> 00:13:11,200
frames during this playback which is
335
00:13:09,440 --> 00:13:14,320
very interesting so you can definitely
336
00:13:11,200 --> 00:13:18,800
edit some even r5 footage if you don't
337
00:13:14,320 --> 00:13:21,519
have a gpu on the intel 11 900k so amd
338
00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:23,279
at the moment is dropping zero frames
339
00:13:21,519 --> 00:13:25,920
zero frames dropped i think we're gonna
340
00:13:23,279 --> 00:13:28,240
have to give this to the amd system i
341
00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:30,959
think red raw 8k and 12k there's no
342
00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:33,200
point in testing these because like
343
00:13:30,959 --> 00:13:34,720
if you're editing these types of footage
344
00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:35,519
you probably have the cash to actually
345
00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:37,600
buy a
346
00:13:35,519 --> 00:13:39,680
dedicated gpu as well so there's no
347
00:13:37,600 --> 00:13:41,519
point in actually trying that so the
348
00:13:39,680 --> 00:13:44,399
conclusion is this
349
00:13:41,519 --> 00:13:46,720
both of these chips can actually edit
350
00:13:44,399 --> 00:13:49,760
some of the mirrorless camera footage
351
00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:53,040
like 4k 60 frames per second up to there
352
00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:56,079
402 or 420 gpu accelerated not both of
353
00:13:53,040 --> 00:13:57,600
them can actually do but intel has an
354
00:13:56,079 --> 00:14:00,639
edge over there just because of the
355
00:13:57,600 --> 00:14:03,279
quick sync support on the premiere pro
356
00:14:00,639 --> 00:14:05,040
and how it utilizes this igpu inside
357
00:14:03,279 --> 00:14:06,399
there it is better it's smoother
358
00:14:05,040 --> 00:14:09,440
experience there might be a little bit
359
00:14:06,399 --> 00:14:12,079
more arty effects but that's that now
360
00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:14,399
the interesting thing here is that amd
361
00:14:12,079 --> 00:14:16,639
actually has quite a lot more overhead
362
00:14:14,399 --> 00:14:19,360
in terms of the upgrade ability because
363
00:14:16,639 --> 00:14:22,000
this one is as good as it gets on intel
364
00:14:19,360 --> 00:14:25,279
system so if you get like another gpu
365
00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:27,440
your cpu is is that's it that's to the
366
00:14:25,279 --> 00:14:29,920
wall you can't go anywhere else whereas
367
00:14:27,440 --> 00:14:32,079
on the amd there's quite a bit of
368
00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:34,320
upgrades actually there if you get a gpu
369
00:14:32,079 --> 00:14:36,800
there and then you can actually put much
370
00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:39,040
better cpus in there ryzen 9s there's a
371
00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:41,440
few ryzen 9's over there which is
372
00:14:39,040 --> 00:14:44,079
amazing the amd also uses much less
373
00:14:41,440 --> 00:14:45,760
energy or electricity it's got a little
374
00:14:44,079 --> 00:14:47,760
bit of an edge over there if you're
375
00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:50,320
thinking about view upgrade path for
376
00:14:47,760 --> 00:14:52,560
this moment at this like point in time
377
00:14:50,320 --> 00:14:54,480
without the dedicated gpu we have to
378
00:14:52,560 --> 00:14:55,680
give the win to intel so this was
379
00:14:54,480 --> 00:14:58,000
premiere pro if you want to know what
380
00:14:55,680 --> 00:15:00,160
the difference is in resolve stay tuned
381
00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:02,480
for the next video likes if you enjoyed
382
00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:04,079
it subs if you want to see more and i'll
383
00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:06,870
see in the next video thanks guys for
384
00:15:04,079 --> 00:15:11,639
watching
385
00:15:06,870 --> 00:15:11,639
[Music]
28058
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.