All language subtitles for Is The New Cheapest B650 Board Any Good_ Asrock B650M-HDV_M.2 Review-en

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,780 --> 00:00:06,020 foreign 1 00:00:02,470 --> 00:00:09,179 [Music] 2 00:00:06,020 --> 00:00:10,740 box today we have a very rare thing a 3 00:00:09,179 --> 00:00:13,860 thing that didn't exist until about a 4 00:00:10,740 --> 00:00:15,480 week ago and that thing is an AMD am5 5 00:00:13,860 --> 00:00:18,840 motherboard that doesn't cost more than 6 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:24,000 most mid-range CPUs as rock recently let 7 00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:25,380 out a quiet squeaker a 125 us b650 8 00:00:24,000 --> 00:00:31,439 motherboard 9 00:00:25,380 --> 00:00:34,680 called the b650m dash hdv M2 pretty 10 00:00:31,439 --> 00:00:36,960 catchy name m.2 sorry a pretty catchy 11 00:00:34,680 --> 00:00:38,640 name that one and unfortunately if 12 00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:41,520 there's anything we know about ASRock 13 00:00:38,640 --> 00:00:43,800 motherboards it's at their hdv series is 14 00:00:41,520 --> 00:00:45,360 complete trash at least that's been the 15 00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:46,440 case for the last few models that we've 16 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:49,440 checked out 17 00:00:46,440 --> 00:00:52,680 so will this b650 version be any 18 00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:55,199 different well we bought one to find out 19 00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:56,940 but before we do today's sponsor spot is 20 00:00:55,199 --> 00:00:59,579 brought to you by thermal Grizzly and 21 00:00:56,940 --> 00:01:01,440 their new 12th gen CPU contact frame by 22 00:00:59,579 --> 00:01:03,840 debauer it's well known that the 23 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:07,080 integrated loading mechanism or ilm of 24 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:09,119 the LJ 1700 sockets Ben's 12th gen CPUs 25 00:01:07,080 --> 00:01:11,520 leading to an uneven contact surface 26 00:01:09,119 --> 00:01:13,500 that reduces cooling performance solving 27 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:15,659 this issue the contact frame replaces 28 00:01:13,500 --> 00:01:18,360 the ilm allowing for a much more even 29 00:01:15,659 --> 00:01:20,400 contact with the cpu's IHS and the base 30 00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:22,320 of your cooler which in turn reduces 31 00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:24,119 operating temperatures installations 32 00:01:22,320 --> 00:01:26,340 quick and easy and thanks to the use of 33 00:01:24,119 --> 00:01:28,439 anodized aluminum the contact frame is 34 00:01:26,340 --> 00:01:30,240 non-conductive and then for those of you 35 00:01:28,439 --> 00:01:32,220 who wish to further maximize contact 36 00:01:30,240 --> 00:01:33,720 thermal Grizzly now offers an optional 37 00:01:32,220 --> 00:01:35,280 lapping tool so for more information 38 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:36,540 please check the link in the video 39 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:38,520 description 40 00:01:36,540 --> 00:01:40,560 okay so prior to the release of this 41 00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:42,780 more affordable ASRock b650 motherboard 42 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:46,740 the cheapest offering from them was the 43 00:01:42,780 --> 00:01:49,560 b650 mpg riptide at 170 us and it's 44 00:01:46,740 --> 00:01:52,320 actually quite a solid board but at 170 45 00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:54,479 it's also very expensive as an entry 46 00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:58,500 point gigabyte did manage to undercut 47 00:01:54,479 --> 00:02:00,780 ASRock with the excellent b650m ds3h 160 48 00:01:58,500 --> 00:02:03,600 and I guess that didn't sit well with 49 00:02:00,780 --> 00:02:07,140 ASRock that said gigabytes also quietly 50 00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:10,800 let out the b650mk and that's also 51 00:02:07,140 --> 00:02:12,780 targeting the 125 us price point and I 52 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:14,819 have ordered one so you can expect some 53 00:02:12,780 --> 00:02:18,180 coverage in the near future 54 00:02:14,819 --> 00:02:21,300 so with a Target price of 125 U.S the 55 00:02:18,180 --> 00:02:23,280 hdv is as you might have expected very 56 00:02:21,300 --> 00:02:24,780 much a Bare Bones motherboard still 57 00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:28,080 while you might only be getting two dim 58 00:02:24,780 --> 00:02:32,459 slots there's a pcie 5.0 m.2 along with 59 00:02:28,080 --> 00:02:35,700 a second PCI 4.0 m.2 two pcie times 16 60 00:02:32,459 --> 00:02:39,959 slots both of which are PCO 4.0 for a 61 00:02:35,700 --> 00:02:42,720 Time 16 times 4 configuration the i o is 62 00:02:39,959 --> 00:02:45,480 very basic there's four USB 2 ports two 63 00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:48,959 USB 3.25 gigabits per second type A 64 00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:51,120 ports and a single USB 3.2 5 gigabits 65 00:02:48,959 --> 00:02:53,340 per second type c Port there's also a 66 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:55,920 bios flashback button along with 2.5 67 00:02:53,340 --> 00:02:58,080 gigabit Lan using a real Tech controller 68 00:02:55,920 --> 00:03:00,599 so the Bare Essentials here for sure 69 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:03,780 there's nothing that fancy and on board 70 00:03:00,599 --> 00:03:06,239 there's a USB 3.2 10 gigabits per second 71 00:03:03,780 --> 00:03:08,280 type c header but that's really as good 72 00:03:06,239 --> 00:03:10,800 as it gets so no 20 gigabits per second 73 00:03:08,280 --> 00:03:12,780 or faster USB here you're also getting 74 00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:15,360 just four SATA ports so that's probably 75 00:03:12,780 --> 00:03:18,239 fine on an m80x motherboard 76 00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:20,580 of course the key concern here is the 77 00:03:18,239 --> 00:03:23,220 vrm as this is traditionally where 78 00:03:20,580 --> 00:03:25,200 asrock's hdv series of motherboards have 79 00:03:23,220 --> 00:03:26,940 failed miserably the good news though 80 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:29,400 being that ASRock lists an eight plus 81 00:03:26,940 --> 00:03:33,239 two plus one power design for the b650 82 00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:35,940 hdv so it can't be all that bad right or 83 00:03:33,239 --> 00:03:37,640 can it now it's probably fine ASRock is 84 00:03:35,940 --> 00:03:40,799 using the Vishay 85 00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:42,540 sic-654 50 amp power stages they went 86 00:03:40,799 --> 00:03:45,540 with a dozen of these power stages on 87 00:03:42,540 --> 00:03:47,040 the b650m PG Riptide and it performed 88 00:03:45,540 --> 00:03:48,900 quite well so I think they'll get away 89 00:03:47,040 --> 00:03:51,659 with eight here but of course we will be 90 00:03:48,900 --> 00:03:53,519 testing that shortly meanwhile the vrm 91 00:03:51,659 --> 00:03:54,659 heatsinks they're not huge certainly 92 00:03:53,519 --> 00:03:56,340 smaller than what we found on the 93 00:03:54,659 --> 00:03:57,659 riptide so it's going to be really 94 00:03:56,340 --> 00:04:00,420 interesting to see how this board 95 00:03:57,659 --> 00:04:02,819 handles the ryzen 9 7950x and speaking 96 00:04:00,420 --> 00:04:04,620 of which let's get on with that for 97 00:04:02,819 --> 00:04:07,680 testing I am using the gigabyte auris 98 00:04:04,620 --> 00:04:10,920 c500 glass case with the gigabyte UD 99 00:04:07,680 --> 00:04:13,260 1000 GM power supply and for cooling the 100 00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:14,879 gigabyte auris water Force X360 101 00:04:13,260 --> 00:04:16,320 millimeter arrow and thank you to 102 00:04:14,879 --> 00:04:18,000 gigabyte from providing all that 103 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,979 hardware for our testing it made the job 104 00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:21,419 a bit easier then for recording 105 00:04:19,979 --> 00:04:22,919 temperatures I'm using a digital 106 00:04:21,419 --> 00:04:25,199 thermometer with k-type thermocouples 107 00:04:22,919 --> 00:04:26,940 and I'll be reporting the rear Peak PCB 108 00:04:25,199 --> 00:04:28,620 temperature and finally I'm not 109 00:04:26,940 --> 00:04:30,060 reporting delta T over ambient Stone 110 00:04:28,620 --> 00:04:32,520 maintain at room temperature of 21 111 00:04:30,060 --> 00:04:34,320 degrees and to ensure a constant ambient 112 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:36,780 temperature a thermocouple is positioned 113 00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:39,479 next to the test system as for the 114 00:04:36,780 --> 00:04:41,940 stress test I am using the ryzen 97950x 115 00:04:39,479 --> 00:04:43,919 and for load cinebench which was looped 116 00:04:41,940 --> 00:04:45,720 for an hour at which point I'm reporting 117 00:04:43,919 --> 00:04:48,720 the maximum PCB temperature again 118 00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:51,900 recorded using k-type thermocouples 119 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:54,000 okay so out of the box the hdv has an 85 120 00:04:51,900 --> 00:04:55,680 degree thermal limit for the CPU which 121 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:57,960 is essentially a power limit though 122 00:04:55,680 --> 00:05:00,180 oddly this limit has been set 10 degrees 123 00:04:57,960 --> 00:05:02,280 higher than the one found on the riptide 124 00:05:00,180 --> 00:05:04,199 thankfully though in that example the 125 00:05:02,280 --> 00:05:06,479 limit was completely unnecessary as the 126 00:05:04,199 --> 00:05:09,000 Riptides of our impact at just 76 127 00:05:06,479 --> 00:05:10,860 degrees with the thermal limit removed 128 00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:13,020 and for those of you unaware the 129 00:05:10,860 --> 00:05:15,900 standard thermal limit or TJ Maxx which 130 00:05:13,020 --> 00:05:18,300 is set by AMD is 95 degrees for the zen4 131 00:05:15,900 --> 00:05:19,800 processors and this affords the CPU a 132 00:05:18,300 --> 00:05:21,900 bit more Headroom when it comes to power 133 00:05:19,800 --> 00:05:24,360 usage for those of you wanting to change 134 00:05:21,900 --> 00:05:26,699 the configuration for the hdv from 85 135 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:28,500 degrees to the standard 95 degrees you 136 00:05:26,699 --> 00:05:30,660 merely need to enter the BIOS and change 137 00:05:28,500 --> 00:05:33,419 the TJ Maxx it's very quick and easy to 138 00:05:30,660 --> 00:05:35,520 do so now despite packing four fewer 50 139 00:05:33,419 --> 00:05:37,979 amp power stages and a smaller varum 140 00:05:35,520 --> 00:05:40,139 heatsink than the riptide the hdv ran 141 00:05:37,979 --> 00:05:42,180 just three degrees hotter at 79 degrees 142 00:05:40,139 --> 00:05:43,680 so just scraping it under 80 degrees 143 00:05:42,180 --> 00:05:45,720 there for the peak temperature in our 144 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:48,180 testing which is certainly an acceptable 145 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:51,000 result and this means the hdv will be 146 00:05:48,180 --> 00:05:53,340 able to handle the 7950x at full power 147 00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:54,780 and basically any environment humans can 148 00:05:53,340 --> 00:05:57,240 survive without having to strip down to 149 00:05:54,780 --> 00:05:59,460 their underwear so that is very handy 150 00:05:57,240 --> 00:06:01,800 now I should probably expect with the 85 151 00:05:59,460 --> 00:06:03,000 degree thermal limit in place the hdv is 152 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:05,340 slightly slower than it would be 153 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:07,440 otherwise in the cinema R23 multi-core 154 00:06:05,340 --> 00:06:09,180 test with the out of the box power limit 155 00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:11,460 removed though the score was boosted by 156 00:06:09,180 --> 00:06:13,800 a mere three percent and now the 7950x 157 00:06:11,460 --> 00:06:15,539 is performing as expected it's really a 158 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:17,639 trivial difference and I'm not really 159 00:06:15,539 --> 00:06:20,039 sure why ASRock keeps releasing boards 160 00:06:17,639 --> 00:06:22,139 that can run at full power with an 161 00:06:20,039 --> 00:06:23,819 artificial limit that said it's really 162 00:06:22,139 --> 00:06:25,800 not a big deal as I've said given how 163 00:06:23,819 --> 00:06:27,539 close the performance is anyway just a 164 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:29,639 bit of an odd Choice there 165 00:06:27,539 --> 00:06:31,259 interestingly the thermal limit did 166 00:06:29,639 --> 00:06:32,699 slightly reduce single core performance 167 00:06:31,259 --> 00:06:34,440 though we're only looking at a single 168 00:06:32,699 --> 00:06:36,180 percentage difference for this workload 169 00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:37,500 and this means for lightly threaded 170 00:06:36,180 --> 00:06:39,300 games there shouldn't be any real 171 00:06:37,500 --> 00:06:41,280 difference between the 85 degree thermal 172 00:06:39,300 --> 00:06:43,560 Limit Out of the Box configuration and 173 00:06:41,280 --> 00:06:44,819 the standard 95 degree configuration and 174 00:06:43,560 --> 00:06:46,560 of course we did only see a three 175 00:06:44,819 --> 00:06:48,180 percent margin in the multi-core test so 176 00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:49,020 again overall this really isn't a big 177 00:06:48,180 --> 00:06:51,840 deal 178 00:06:49,020 --> 00:06:54,539 as for gaming the hdv does very well 179 00:06:51,840 --> 00:06:56,400 relative to other ASRock MSI and Asus 180 00:06:54,539 --> 00:07:00,539 boards with the limits removed we went 181 00:06:56,400 --> 00:07:02,100 from 249 fps to 251 FPS which is still 182 00:07:00,539 --> 00:07:03,660 well done on the gigabyte boards due to 183 00:07:02,100 --> 00:07:05,699 gigabytes more aggressive memory tuning 184 00:07:03,660 --> 00:07:07,380 out of the box which results in a five 185 00:07:05,699 --> 00:07:09,479 percent boost here 186 00:07:07,380 --> 00:07:11,819 performance on Watchdogs Legion is much 187 00:07:09,479 --> 00:07:14,039 similar between the various b650 boards 188 00:07:11,819 --> 00:07:17,100 and again the hdv performed very well 189 00:07:14,039 --> 00:07:19,319 allowing for 155 FPS on average with the 190 00:07:17,100 --> 00:07:22,620 power limits removed now this is really 191 00:07:19,319 --> 00:07:26,520 interesting using our ddr5 6000cl30 192 00:07:22,620 --> 00:07:29,220 memory with Expo loaded the hdv took on 193 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:31,380 average just 16 seconds to load Windows 194 00:07:29,220 --> 00:07:33,000 11. and this is from pushing the power 195 00:07:31,380 --> 00:07:35,280 button to the system booting up and 196 00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:37,740 hitting the Windows desktop just 16 197 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:39,240 seconds that took interestingly it was a 198 00:07:37,740 --> 00:07:41,759 few seconds slower using the standard 199 00:07:39,240 --> 00:07:44,460 out of the box configuration but overall 200 00:07:41,759 --> 00:07:45,840 either configuration was very fast and I 201 00:07:44,460 --> 00:07:47,940 should note that all of the comparative 202 00:07:45,840 --> 00:07:50,400 data featured in this video from the 203 00:07:47,940 --> 00:07:52,620 previously tested b650 motherboards was 204 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:54,599 done so in many instances using older 205 00:07:52,620 --> 00:07:56,460 boss revisions that have possibly now 206 00:07:54,599 --> 00:07:58,560 been updated that said not all the 207 00:07:56,460 --> 00:08:00,620 boards have been updated yet and the hdv 208 00:07:58,560 --> 00:08:04,319 is still using ajisa 209 00:08:00,620 --> 00:08:06,599 1.0.0.5 C but MSI for example has now 210 00:08:04,319 --> 00:08:08,520 updated their b650 range and are 211 00:08:06,599 --> 00:08:10,080 claiming improved boot time so that's 212 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:12,780 something that I'll have to retest when 213 00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:14,819 I get time but even so sub 20 second 214 00:08:12,780 --> 00:08:17,039 load times here for the hdv is 215 00:08:14,819 --> 00:08:18,720 incredible so much so that I ended up 216 00:08:17,039 --> 00:08:20,580 recording a little video on posted it to 217 00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:22,379 Twitter when I first discovered just how 218 00:08:20,580 --> 00:08:24,960 fast this thing could load into Windows 219 00:08:22,379 --> 00:08:26,099 11 from hitting the power button and I 220 00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:28,080 should just note that it might not be 221 00:08:26,099 --> 00:08:30,419 this fast with every memory kit on the 222 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:33,539 qualified vendor list as it was with RG 223 00:08:30,419 --> 00:08:35,339 skill ddr5 6000 memory but even so this 224 00:08:33,539 --> 00:08:37,320 result is unlike anything we've seen 225 00:08:35,339 --> 00:08:39,360 previously from an am5 motherboard using 226 00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:41,219 this exact memory kit so I do Wonder 227 00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:42,959 just how much the Dual memory dim design 228 00:08:41,219 --> 00:08:45,300 helps with this 229 00:08:42,959 --> 00:08:47,940 so there you have it an ASRock hdv 230 00:08:45,300 --> 00:08:50,399 motherboard that's actually really good 231 00:08:47,940 --> 00:08:52,380 what a time to be alive maybe it's all 232 00:08:50,399 --> 00:08:54,240 our past content that help lead here can 233 00:08:52,380 --> 00:08:56,399 we take full credit for it 234 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:58,320 I'm going to take full credit for it I 235 00:08:56,399 --> 00:09:00,899 think the only slight bit of 236 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:03,959 disappointing news here as this board 237 00:09:00,899 --> 00:09:05,459 was suggested to be 125 us motherboard 238 00:09:03,959 --> 00:09:08,640 so that was the I believe the Target 239 00:09:05,459 --> 00:09:09,959 price 125 us but at present it's selling 240 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:11,940 for more like a hundred and forty 241 00:09:09,959 --> 00:09:14,160 dollars U.S could just be an early 242 00:09:11,940 --> 00:09:17,339 introductory price not sure on that one 243 00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:21,000 but it is still around 20 U.S less than 244 00:09:17,339 --> 00:09:22,680 the gigabyte b650m ds3h 245 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:24,600 still that's quite an improvement on 246 00:09:22,680 --> 00:09:27,480 price and they are similar equipped 247 00:09:24,600 --> 00:09:28,980 boards the gigabyte b650 mdh3h does 248 00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:31,800 offer greater flexibility when it comes 249 00:09:28,980 --> 00:09:34,500 to memory expansion but with the hdv you 250 00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:36,839 are getting extra stuff like PCA 5.0 to 251 00:09:34,500 --> 00:09:39,720 one of the m.2s a better pcie 252 00:09:36,839 --> 00:09:41,640 configuration so I'd say the 20 discount 253 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:43,440 does make the ASRock model the more 254 00:09:41,640 --> 00:09:46,620 attractive option having said I love 255 00:09:43,440 --> 00:09:49,260 that though gigabytes b650 MK can be had 256 00:09:46,620 --> 00:09:51,360 for 130 right now which is ten dollars 257 00:09:49,260 --> 00:09:54,060 less than the hdv so I am Keen to check 258 00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:55,740 that one out as for which zen4 processor 259 00:09:54,060 --> 00:09:58,860 makes sense to pair with asrock's new 260 00:09:55,740 --> 00:10:00,779 Ultra affordable hdv well anything will 261 00:09:58,860 --> 00:10:02,700 work just fine as we saw but I imagine 262 00:10:00,779 --> 00:10:04,920 those focusing on productivity and 263 00:10:02,700 --> 00:10:07,500 therefore opting for a 12 or 16 core 264 00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:08,760 ryzen 9 part this board's probably not 265 00:10:07,500 --> 00:10:11,580 going to be all that appealing to you 266 00:10:08,760 --> 00:10:15,180 you'll likely want better pcie m.2 and 267 00:10:11,580 --> 00:10:17,940 USB support meaning 200 plus am5 boards 268 00:10:15,180 --> 00:10:20,339 will be more attractive rather I see the 269 00:10:17,940 --> 00:10:23,519 hdv being a great board for gamers 270 00:10:20,339 --> 00:10:25,920 something to pair with the 230 us ryzen 271 00:10:23,519 --> 00:10:27,839 5 7 600 while also having the option to 272 00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:30,240 upgrade in the future in the comfort of 273 00:10:27,839 --> 00:10:32,940 knowing that the board can handle 170 274 00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:35,100 watt ryzen processors with ease and with 275 00:10:32,940 --> 00:10:37,320 multiple years of support promised you 276 00:10:35,100 --> 00:10:39,600 should have a strong upgrade path ahead 277 00:10:37,320 --> 00:10:42,120 of you it's probably also not a bad 278 00:10:39,600 --> 00:10:44,279 value board for the ryzen 7 at 7 7800x 279 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:46,380 3D which will be released shortly though 280 00:10:44,279 --> 00:10:49,019 I'd probably suggest going for one of 281 00:10:46,380 --> 00:10:51,420 the am5 boards priced closer to 200 if 282 00:10:49,019 --> 00:10:54,720 you're going to spend 450 us on your CPU 283 00:10:51,420 --> 00:10:56,220 the extra 60 also buys you some nicer 284 00:10:54,720 --> 00:10:57,720 features that should see the platform 285 00:10:56,220 --> 00:10:59,820 age a bit better 286 00:10:57,720 --> 00:11:05,100 whatever the case it's good to see the 287 00:10:59,820 --> 00:11:09,180 ASRock b650m Dash hdv m.2 works well 288 00:11:05,100 --> 00:11:12,420 with no vrm concerns to speak of so big 289 00:11:09,180 --> 00:11:15,300 thank you to our patreon floatplane DOT 290 00:11:12,420 --> 00:11:17,760 m.2 members for enabling us to buy this 291 00:11:15,300 --> 00:11:19,560 Hardware as rock were sending us aboard 292 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:20,760 initially I did ask them for a ball when 293 00:11:19,560 --> 00:11:22,620 this thing was first announced and they 294 00:11:20,760 --> 00:11:24,120 told us they didn't have samples and 295 00:11:22,620 --> 00:11:26,339 they did nothing to provide a board 296 00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:28,320 which usually means this thing's low end 297 00:11:26,339 --> 00:11:29,220 and not particularly good and therefore 298 00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:30,779 we don't want to promote it which 299 00:11:29,220 --> 00:11:32,880 thankfully wasn't the case this time 300 00:11:30,779 --> 00:11:34,380 anyway to ASRock to their credit they 301 00:11:32,880 --> 00:11:36,180 did get back to me about a week ago and 302 00:11:34,380 --> 00:11:39,000 so we have samples now and we're sending 303 00:11:36,180 --> 00:11:40,500 a board out but that board hasn't 304 00:11:39,000 --> 00:11:42,600 arrived yet so I purchased this one 305 00:11:40,500 --> 00:11:43,980 about a week before they told me they 306 00:11:42,600 --> 00:11:45,839 could get us aboard so we were able to 307 00:11:43,980 --> 00:11:47,820 get this board a bit earlier do the 308 00:11:45,839 --> 00:11:48,720 video and yeah so big thank you to the 309 00:11:47,820 --> 00:11:49,740 people who support the channel because 310 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:51,600 it meant we were able to get this 311 00:11:49,740 --> 00:11:54,240 content at least out to you a bit sooner 312 00:11:51,600 --> 00:11:55,920 and we were able to review a retail 313 00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:57,779 sample for whatever that's worth but 314 00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:59,100 yeah also thanks to ASRock for for 315 00:11:57,779 --> 00:12:00,779 sending us the boards of it we'll have 316 00:11:59,100 --> 00:12:03,060 two of these now so I guess I can test 317 00:12:00,779 --> 00:12:04,860 the uh review sample as well and see how 318 00:12:03,060 --> 00:12:06,180 it compares to the retail board but 319 00:12:04,860 --> 00:12:08,160 anyway good stuff there if you would 320 00:12:06,180 --> 00:12:09,660 like to become a float plane or patreon 321 00:12:08,160 --> 00:12:10,920 member and support the channel directly 322 00:12:09,660 --> 00:12:12,060 and get some cool perks in return flight 323 00:12:10,920 --> 00:12:14,100 plan patreon links in the video 324 00:12:12,060 --> 00:12:15,839 description you get access to monthly 325 00:12:14,100 --> 00:12:17,640 live streamers here myself behind the 326 00:12:15,839 --> 00:12:19,380 scenes content q and A's and of course 327 00:12:17,640 --> 00:12:21,420 our exclusive Discord server which is an 328 00:12:19,380 --> 00:12:22,980 awesome place to hang out and talk Tech 329 00:12:21,420 --> 00:12:25,140 but if you're not interested in any of 330 00:12:22,980 --> 00:12:26,100 that that is perfectly fine and I would 331 00:12:25,140 --> 00:12:28,320 like to thank you for watching this 332 00:12:26,100 --> 00:12:30,500 video I'm your host Dave see you next 333 00:12:28,320 --> 00:12:30,500 time 334 00:12:31,560 --> 00:12:43,220 [Music] 335 00:12:40,220 --> 00:12:43,220 thank you 336 00:12:43,520 --> 00:12:46,570 [Music] 337 00:12:48,420 --> 00:12:50,959 foreign 25554

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.