Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Instructor: Correlation adjusts covariance
so that the relationship between
the two variables becomes easy
and intuitive to interpret.
The formulas
for the correlation coefficient are the covariance divided
by the product of the standard deviations
of the two variables.
This is either sample or population,
depending on the data you are working with.
We already have the standard deviations
of the two data sets.
Now, we'll use the formula
in order to find the sample correlation coefficient.
Mathematically,
there is no way to obtain a correlation value greater
than one or a less than minus one.
Remember, the coefficient of variation we talked
about a couple of lessons ago,
well, this concept is similar.
We manipulated the strange covariance value
in order to get something intuitive.
Let's examine it for a bit.
We got a sample correlation coefficient of 0.87,
so there is a strong relationship between the two values.
The correlation of one, also known
as perfect positive correlation,
means that the entire variability
of one variable is explained by the other variable.
However, logically we know that size determines the price.
On average, the bigger house you build,
the more expensive it will be.
This relationship goes only this way.
Once a house is built,
if for some reason it becomes more expensive,
its size doesn't increase,
although there is a positive correlation.
Okay, a correlation of zero between two variables means
that they are absolutely independent from each other.
We would expect a correlation of zero
between the price of coffee in Brazil
and the price of houses in London, right?
The two variables don't have anything in common.
Finally, we can have a negative correlation coefficient.
It can be perfect negative correlation of minus one
or much more likely an imperfect negative correlation
of a value between minus one and zero.
Think of the following businesses.
A company producing ice cream
and a company selling umbrellas.
Ice cream tends to be sold more when the weather is very
good and people buy umbrellas when it's rainy.
Obviously there is a negative correlation between the two,
and hence, when one of the companies makes more money,
the other won't.
All right, before we continue, we must note
that the correlation between two variables X
and Y is the same as the correlation between Y and X.
The formula is completely symmetrical with respect
to both variables.
Therefore, the correlation of price and size is the same
as the one of size and price.
This leads us to causality.
It is very important for any analyst or researcher
to understand the direction of causal relationships.
In the housing business, size causes the price,
and not vice versa.
We will explore this topic in much more detail
in the regression analysis section later on.
For now, it is only needed
that you realize that correlation does not imply causation.
Okay, very good.
With this example,
we conclude the section on descriptive statistics.
In the next lesson,
you will see a real life database example
that applies all the knowledge you acquired in this section.
You definitely don't wanna miss it.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.