Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Narrator: While variance is a common measure
of data dispersion in most cases,
the figure you will obtain is pretty large
and hard to compare as the unit of measurement is squared.
The easy fix is to calculate it square root
and obtain a statistic known as standard deviation.
In most analyses, you perform standard deviation
will be much more meaningful than variants.
As we saw in the previous lecture.
There are different measures
for the population and sample variants.
Consequently, there is also population
and sample standard deviation.
The formulas are the square root of the population variance
and square root of the sample variance, respectively.
I believe there is no need
for an example of the calculation, right?
If you have a calculator in your hands
you'll be able to do the job.
All right?
The other measure we still have to introduce is
the coefficient of variation.
It is equal to the standard deviation divided by the mean.
Another name for the term is relative standard deviation.
This is an easy way to remember its formula.
It is simply the standard deviation relative to the mean.
As you probably guessed
there is a population and sample formula once again
so standard deviation is the most common measure
of variability for a single data set.
But why do we need yet another measure such
as the coefficient of variation?
Well, comparing the standard deviations
of two different data sets is meaningless
but comparing coefficients of variation is not.
Aristotle once said, Tell me, I'll forget.
Show me, I'll remember.
Involve me, I'll understand.
To make sure you remember, here's an example
of a comparison between standard deviations.
Let's take the prices of pizza at 10 different places
in New York, they range from one to $11.
Now, imagine that you only have Mexican pesos, and to you
the prices look more like 18.81 pesos to 206.91 pesos.
Given the exchange rate of 18.81 pesos for $1
let's combine our knowledge so far and find the standard
deviations and coefficients of variation
of these two data sets.
First, we have to see if this is a sample or a population.
Are there only 11 restaurants in New York?
Of course not.
This is obviously a sample drawn from all the restaurants
in the city.
Then we have to use the formulas for sample measures
of variability.
Second, we have to find the mean.
The mean in dollars is equal to 5.5 and the mean in pesos
to 103.46.
The third step of the process
is finding the sample variance.
Following the formula that we showed earlier
we can obtain $10.72 squared and 3793.69 peso squared.
The respect of sample standard deviations
are $3.27 and 61.59 pesos.
Let's make a couple of observations.
First, variance gives results
in squared units while standard deviation in original units.
This is the main reason why professionals prefer to
use standard deviation as the main measure of variability.
It is directly interpretable.
Square dollars means nothing even
in the field of statistics.
Second, we got standard deviations of 3.27
and 61.59 for the same pizza
at the same 11 restaurants in New York City.
Seems wrong, right?
Don't worry.
It is time to use our last tool
the coefficient of variation
dividing the standard deviations by the respective means.
We get the two coefficients of variation.
The result is the same, 0.60.
Notice that it is not dollars pesos, dollars squared
or peso squared.
It is just zero point 60.
This shows us the great advantage
that the coefficient of variation gives us.
Now, we can confidently say
that the two data sets have the same variability
which is what we expected beforehand.
Let's recap what we have learned so far.
There are three main measures of variability,
variance, standard deviation and coefficient of variation.
Each of them has different strengths and applications.
You should feel confident using all of them
as we are getting closer to more complex statistical topics.
And remember, Aristotle's advice,
involve me, I'll understand.
So please don't forget to get involved with the exercises.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.