Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Instructor: Welcome back everybody.
Many scientific papers rely on conducting experiments
or surveys.
They often provide summarized statistics
we use to analyze and interpret
how certain factors affect one another.
An example would illustrate this better.
Imagine you conducted a survey
where 100 men and women of all ages were asked
if they eat meat.
The results are summarized in the table on the screen.
We see 15 of the 47 women that participated are vegetarian
as are 29 out of the 53 men.
Now, if A represents being vegetarian
and B represents being a woman
then P of A,
given B
and P of B,
given A
express different events.
The former equals 15 over 47
and represents the likelihood of a woman being vegetarian.
While the latter equals 15 over 44
and expresses the likelihood of a vegetarian being a woman.
Since 15 over 44 is greater than 15 over 47,
it is more likely for a vegetarian to be female
than for of a woman not to eat meat.
That's quite interesting
and shows you that in probability theory
things are never straightforward.
Now that you understand the distinctions between
the different conditional probabilities of two events,
we can introduce an important concept,
the law of total probability.
Okay.
Imagine A is the union of some finitely many events,
B1, B2 and so on.
This law dictates that the probability of A is
the sum of all the conditional probabilities of A
given some B multiplied
by the probability of the associated B.
To clear any confusion.
Let us go back to the survey example.
The probability of being vegetarian
equals the sum of the probability of being a vegetarian
given the person is male
times the probability of being male
and the probability of being a vegetarian
given the person is female
multiplied by the probability of being female.
If we plug in values from the table,
we get the probability of being vegetarian
equals 29 over 53,
times 53 over 100,
plus 15 over 47,
times 47 over 100.
That's 44 over 100
or 0.44.
Therefore, according to the survey
there is a 44% chance of someone being vegetarian.
We can refer back to the table and confirm
the probability of being vegetarian is indeed 0.44.
So our answer checks out.
Great.
In the next video
we are going to introduce the Additive Law
and the multiplication rule.
Thanks for watching.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.