Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Narrator: Now that we've seen the different types of data
and levels of measurement we can have,
we are ready to explore different graphs and tables,
which will allow us to visually represent
the data we are working with.
Visualizing data is the most intuitive way to interpret it,
so it's an invaluable skill.
It is much easier to visualize data
if you know its type and measurement level.
As you may recall, there are two types of variables,
categorical and numerical.
In this video, we will focus on categorical variables.
Some of the most common ways to visualize them
are frequency distribution tables, bar charts, pie charts,
and Pareto diagrams.
First, let's see
what a frequency distribution table looks like.
It has two columns, the category itself
and the corresponding frequency.
Imagine you own a car shop and you sell only German cars.
The table below shows the categories of cars,
Audi, BMW, and Mercedes,
and their frequency,
or in plain English, the number of units sold.
By organizing your data in this way,
you can compare the different brands
and see that Audi has been sold the most,
so that is a frequency distribution table.
However, tables aren't much fun, are they?
Using the same table,
we can construct a bar chart, also known as column chart.
The vertical axis shows the number of units sold,
while each bar represents a different category
indicated on the horizontal axis.
In this way, it is much, much clearer
that Audi is the best selling brand.
Okay, let's represent the same data as a pie chart.
In order to build one, we need to calculate
what percentage of the total each brand represents.
In statistics, this is known as relative frequency.
Naturally, all relative frequencies add up to 100%.
Pie charts are especially useful
when we want to not only compare items among each other,
but also see their share of the total.
Okay, this example could be easily transformed
into a business example of market share.
Market share is so predominantly represented by pie charts
that if you search for market share in Google Images,
you would only get pie charts.
Imagine that the data in our table
is representing the sales of Audi, BMW, and Mercedes
in a single German city, say, Bonn.
The chart will show us the market share
that each of these brands has.
Lastly, we have the Pareto diagram.
In fact, a Pareto diagram
is nothing more than a special type of bar chart
where categories are shown in descending order of frequency.
By frequency,
statisticians mean the number of occurrences of each item.
As we said earlier, in our example,
that's exactly the number of units sold.
Let's go back to our frequency distribution table
and order the brands by frequency.
Now we can create the bar chart
based on the reordered table,
and voila, we almost have a Pareto diagram.
There is one last touch to make it one,
a curve on the same graph, showing the cumulative frequency.
The cumulative frequency
is the sum of the relative frequencies.
It starts as the frequency of the first brand
and then we add the second, the third, and so on,
until it finishes at 100%.
This polygonal line is measured by a different vertical axis
on the right of the graph.
At each of its vertices,
it shows the subtotal of the categories to its left.
See how the Pareto diagram
combines the strong sides of the bar and the pie chart?
It is easy to compare the data both between categories
and as a part of the total.
Furthermore, if this was a market share graph,
you could easily see the market share
of the top two or top five companies.
Finally, it is named after Vilfredo Pareto.
You may have heard of another idea of his,
the Pareto Principle, also known as the 80-20 rule.
It states that 80% of the effects
come from 20% of the causes.
A real life example is a statement by Microsoft
that by fixing 20% of its software bugs,
they managed to solve
80% of the problems customers experience.
A Pareto diagram can reveal information like that.
It is designed to show how subtotals change
with each additional category
and provide us with a better understanding of our data.
Okay, these are the main ways
in which we can visually represent categorical data.
In our next lecture, we will get acquainted
with the most useful graphs and tables for numerical data.
Thanks for watching.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.