Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,030 --> 00:00:03,520
[Music]
1
00:00:01,760 --> 00:00:05,359
today we're reviewing an amd
2
00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:06,879
apu that doesn't come out officially for
3
00:00:05,359 --> 00:00:08,559
another two months but it's been
4
00:00:06,879 --> 00:00:10,240
floating around in the oem pre-built
5
00:00:08,559 --> 00:00:14,320
market for a little while now and that
6
00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:15,679
is the 5600g so it's an r5 apu
7
00:00:14,320 --> 00:00:17,440
that means it has vega graphics
8
00:00:15,679 --> 00:00:20,160
integrated it's not rdna
9
00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:22,240
and it also means that it's minimally a
10
00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:24,800
stop gap if you don't have a gpu
11
00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:26,000
to potentially a reasonable solution for
12
00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:27,279
certain types of gaming
13
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,880
so we're going to be reviewing that of
14
00:00:27,279 --> 00:00:30,480
course we'll review the time machine we
15
00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:33,680
use to get this later
16
00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:36,399
but we'll start with the amd 5600g and
17
00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:37,920
the 260 dollar price bracket for an apu
18
00:00:36,399 --> 00:00:39,920
before that this video is brought to you
19
00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,840
by keoxia said to be the original
20
00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:43,680
inventors of nand flash memory and
21
00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:45,200
formerly known as toshiba memory
22
00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:48,239
kiouksia's xg6
23
00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:50,559
m.2 ssd is a high-end nvme ssd claiming
24
00:00:48,239 --> 00:00:52,879
up to 3180 megabytes per second read and
25
00:00:50,559 --> 00:00:53,920
2960 megabytes per second write speeds
26
00:00:52,879 --> 00:00:55,520
sequentially
27
00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:57,199
and it's ideally used in high
28
00:00:55,520 --> 00:01:00,399
performance gaming pcs
29
00:00:57,199 --> 00:01:02,079
or power conscious laptops the xg6 is
30
00:01:00,399 --> 00:01:05,199
available up to one terabyte
31
00:01:02,079 --> 00:01:08,479
and the company also has its bg4 ssd
32
00:01:05,199 --> 00:01:10,560
in a much smaller m.2 2230 form factor
33
00:01:08,479 --> 00:01:12,000
for up to one terabyte of ultra compact
34
00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,840
storage learn more about
35
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:15,200
keoxia at the links in the description
36
00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:17,200
below including
37
00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,799
about their enterprise storage products
38
00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:19,680
so some basics for these these are
39
00:01:18,799 --> 00:01:21,439
actually available
40
00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:23,920
they are being sold in pre-built and if
41
00:01:21,439 --> 00:01:25,439
you check amd's website for the 5600g
42
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,920
it actually lists the official launch
43
00:01:25,439 --> 00:01:31,040
date as march 13th or so
44
00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:32,159
of this year but the official launch
45
00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:34,240
date to the
46
00:01:32,159 --> 00:01:35,840
diy market as opposed to just the launch
47
00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:38,560
date to the market in general
48
00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:40,320
is august 5th so it's a little ways away
49
00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:42,399
because this is a retail available
50
00:01:40,320 --> 00:01:44,240
product we're under no obligations from
51
00:01:42,399 --> 00:01:45,520
amd in terms of embargoes or anything
52
00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:47,360
like that
53
00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:49,280
and it also means that it's a finalized
54
00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:51,360
product to some extent but
55
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:53,280
with a couple of months between when
56
00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:54,960
these started shipping out to
57
00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:56,560
actual users who bought pre-built
58
00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:59,200
systems at retail
59
00:01:56,560 --> 00:02:00,960
and the time at which the diy systems or
60
00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:03,040
diy parts come out separately
61
00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:04,560
it's possible that there are iterative
62
00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:05,920
changes in drivers
63
00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:08,080
or in the silicone quality or something
64
00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:10,640
like that so we'll revisit these as
65
00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:11,520
we get in the uh more official diy part
66
00:02:10,640 --> 00:02:13,040
review samples
67
00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,879
we don't suspect there to be any major
68
00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:16,239
changes because again this is something
69
00:02:14,879 --> 00:02:17,680
that you can actually buy it's not like
70
00:02:16,239 --> 00:02:19,520
we went through back channels to get it
71
00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,040
you can just buy it on the market openly
72
00:02:19,520 --> 00:02:22,239
if you especially if you go through like
73
00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,239
hp or someone who
74
00:02:22,239 --> 00:02:25,920
carries it in larger quantities couple
75
00:02:24,239 --> 00:02:27,440
of notes here if you go to try and buy
76
00:02:25,920 --> 00:02:28,720
one of these standalone right now as
77
00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:30,879
opposed to through
78
00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:32,080
a pre-built system you're probably going
79
00:02:30,879 --> 00:02:34,879
to pay scalper prices
80
00:02:32,080 --> 00:02:36,000
and cpus are not being as heavily scaled
81
00:02:34,879 --> 00:02:37,680
as gpus
82
00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:40,400
we've been able at least in the u.s
83
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:43,040
market where we check to find 5 800 x's
84
00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:44,160
5600 x's or some variant of a 10 series
85
00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:46,560
intel cpu
86
00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:48,239
in stock close to msrp or below it in
87
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:50,319
intel's cases a lot of time
88
00:02:48,239 --> 00:02:51,280
pretty regularly now for a few months so
89
00:02:50,319 --> 00:02:53,360
don't pay scalp
90
00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:54,720
prices if you can avoid it for something
91
00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,720
like an apu
92
00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:58,400
because there are other parts out there
93
00:02:56,720 --> 00:02:58,800
and some of them even do have igps in
94
00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:00,480
them
95
00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:02,400
so it's not quite as bad as the gpu
96
00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:03,200
market uh we're just trying to make sure
97
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:05,280
people don't
98
00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:06,400
rip themselves off by accident because
99
00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:08,720
they see this review
100
00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:10,879
they see one of these on ebay for 500
101
00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:12,959
and they buy it you shouldn't do that
102
00:03:10,879 --> 00:03:14,959
so these are supposed to be 260 parts
103
00:03:12,959 --> 00:03:17,120
when they come out for the 5600g
104
00:03:14,959 --> 00:03:18,879
a little more expensive for the 5700g
105
00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:19,280
but there are normal cpus in stock as
106
00:03:18,879 --> 00:03:20,879
well
107
00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:22,879
again through retailers so the specs
108
00:03:20,879 --> 00:03:25,120
page from amd says it's a six core 12
109
00:03:22,879 --> 00:03:26,480
thread part that matches for the 56
110
00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:29,440
naming like the 5600
111
00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:30,480
x it says it has seven gpu cores or
112
00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:33,519
compute units
113
00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:35,360
cus by amd's radeon terminology it's a
114
00:03:33,519 --> 00:03:37,680
65 watt tdp
115
00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:40,640
it has an adjustable tdp down to 45
116
00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:41,360
watts and it runs a 3.9 to 4.4 gigahertz
117
00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,440
base or
118
00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:44,799
boost for limited core boosting there's
119
00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,560
a 1900 megahertz
120
00:03:44,799 --> 00:03:48,400
gpu spec and we'll check on that in
121
00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:50,000
benchmarking official memory support
122
00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:51,360
like the rest of zen three and this
123
00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:53,439
is zen three by the way it's seven
124
00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:54,640
nanometers is 3200 megahertz you can
125
00:03:53,439 --> 00:03:57,280
overclock as desired
126
00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:58,799
we tested with our normal c14 3200
127
00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:01,519
megahertz with tuning
128
00:03:58,799 --> 00:04:02,400
uh trident zrgb kit as a reminder we've
129
00:04:01,519 --> 00:04:04,159
found that this
130
00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,519
setup that we use for standardized
131
00:04:04,159 --> 00:04:07,760
testing on everything
132
00:04:05,519 --> 00:04:09,519
runs faster than a lot of the 3600 kits
133
00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:10,959
so this is all standardized that means
134
00:04:09,519 --> 00:04:13,439
you can compare everything to each other
135
00:04:10,959 --> 00:04:16,320
from one igp from intel to amd's apus
136
00:04:13,439 --> 00:04:17,680
or between the cpu and dgpu combinations
137
00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:20,079
if there's enough interest
138
00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:20,880
and please let us know below we might
139
00:04:20,079 --> 00:04:22,800
look into
140
00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:24,400
a separate memory piece with the apu
141
00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:25,680
specifically the reason that's been
142
00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:27,199
interesting in the past
143
00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:29,120
is pretty simple it's because there's no
144
00:04:27,199 --> 00:04:29,680
onboard memory because it's not a video
145
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:32,960
card
146
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:34,400
and so that means when the cus in this
147
00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:36,000
need to get something out of memory
148
00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:37,040
they're traveling to system memory if
149
00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:39,520
they can't find it
150
00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:40,560
in a closer cache and traveling to
151
00:04:39,520 --> 00:04:43,520
system memory is
152
00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:44,160
it's a further journey and uh the memory
153
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,400
is
154
00:04:44,160 --> 00:04:47,720
not particularly fast when you compare
155
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:51,360
against say
156
00:04:47,720 --> 00:04:54,400
gddr6x on a pcb that contains
157
00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:56,400
the substrate for the gpu in a dgpu
158
00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:58,080
solution in speaking with amd though
159
00:04:56,400 --> 00:05:00,560
previously the
160
00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:01,759
memory impact on these apus it sounds
161
00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:02,240
like shouldn't be as severe as we've
162
00:05:01,759 --> 00:05:04,080
seen
163
00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:05,680
sometimes in the past in fact amd's
164
00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,600
charts that it presented during its
165
00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:09,759
keynote whenever it announced them were
166
00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:11,680
using 3200 megahertz memory but as a
167
00:05:09,759 --> 00:05:13,759
reminder i was just tuned the most maybe
168
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,919
obvious competition with this would be
169
00:05:13,759 --> 00:05:18,000
a cheap cpu and dgpu that's normally the
170
00:05:15,919 --> 00:05:20,080
case the market is screwy now
171
00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:21,440
so it throws the pricing off but for the
172
00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:22,960
last week while we've been working on
173
00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:25,039
this we've been consistently able to
174
00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:28,880
find an intel i3 10 100
175
00:05:25,039 --> 00:05:32,160
in stock for about 125 to 140 depending
176
00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:33,440
and a gt 1030 gddr5 version for about
177
00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:36,000
120 bucks
178
00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:37,600
so that puts us in the range of 240 to
179
00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:41,039
maybe 260
180
00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:43,520
for the cpu plus dgpu cheap combination
181
00:05:41,039 --> 00:05:44,720
versus the 260 apu that would be the
182
00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:46,400
best comparison because
183
00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:47,759
in the past what we've been looking at
184
00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:50,800
in a normal market is
185
00:05:47,759 --> 00:05:52,000
very simple it's if you have a really
186
00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:54,800
strict budget
187
00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:56,000
do you buy an apu for something like 120
188
00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:58,880
140 bucks
189
00:05:56,000 --> 00:06:00,160
or do you buy a cheap cpu and d gpu that
190
00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:03,680
might be like a pentium
191
00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:06,240
g 3568 or whatever it's called
192
00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:06,960
or it might be something like a cheap r3
193
00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:09,520
cpu
194
00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:11,919
and some low end gpu often it would be a
195
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:14,560
710 or a 1030 something in that class
196
00:06:11,919 --> 00:06:16,080
don't buy a ddr5 1030 by the way now
197
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:18,560
there's a slightly different angle where
198
00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:21,360
aps are also a stop gap solution
199
00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:22,400
if you need something to run anything
200
00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:24,560
while you wait for
201
00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:25,919
a more permanent gpu and so with the
202
00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,840
5600g
203
00:06:25,919 --> 00:06:30,080
you end up with a cpu that's relatively
204
00:06:27,840 --> 00:06:31,919
powerful so that it doesn't become
205
00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:34,479
useless when you do eventually upgrade
206
00:06:31,919 --> 00:06:36,080
it to a dedicated gpu you still have a
207
00:06:34,479 --> 00:06:38,400
six core 12 thread
208
00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:40,240
zen three ryzen part in there even if
209
00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,759
the igp becomes worthless at that point
210
00:06:40,240 --> 00:06:42,400
let's get into some of the testing as a
211
00:06:41,759 --> 00:06:44,560
reminder
212
00:06:42,400 --> 00:06:46,400
this is an official product that means
213
00:06:44,560 --> 00:06:46,960
it is all working and it's something you
214
00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:48,960
can buy
215
00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:50,560
through oams but it's also not
216
00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:52,720
officially out through diy
217
00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:54,960
very strange situation so we will be
218
00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:57,360
revisiting this as things iterate
219
00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:59,120
and move towards diy launch let's start
220
00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:00,800
with some validation testing
221
00:06:59,120 --> 00:07:02,240
before we get started with the testing
222
00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:04,080
some notes on the setup
223
00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:06,240
first off not every board will support
224
00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:08,160
these apus you'll obviously need
225
00:07:06,240 --> 00:07:11,280
on-board display out of some kind
226
00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:13,199
usually hdmi in order to use the igp
227
00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:14,880
but other than that it's pretty standard
228
00:07:13,199 --> 00:07:18,240
you'll also need a bios update to
229
00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:20,800
support the 5600g and 5700g our gigabyte
230
00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:22,400
x570 master for example was unable to
231
00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:24,080
boot with the 5600g
232
00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:27,280
so we had to switch over to a different
233
00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:28,400
board it's the gigabyte b550 aorus pro
234
00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:29,840
this isn't a big deal
235
00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:31,840
just if you're planning to buy a
236
00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:32,240
pre-built system and rip the apu out of
237
00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:34,000
it
238
00:07:32,240 --> 00:07:35,680
check the cpu support list on the board
239
00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:37,599
you're intending to use before you
240
00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:39,280
commit to buying both of those things
241
00:07:37,599 --> 00:07:41,039
even if you intend on using a normal
242
00:07:39,280 --> 00:07:41,680
video card and never using integrated
243
00:07:41,039 --> 00:07:42,960
graphics
244
00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:45,440
you'll need to make sure the board is
245
00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:47,440
compatible bios is mostly the same it's
246
00:07:45,440 --> 00:07:49,759
the usual amd overclocking options
247
00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:50,800
and gigabyte bios combination with the
248
00:07:49,759 --> 00:07:53,280
key difference being
249
00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:55,039
an amd overclocking sub page for
250
00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:57,360
integrated graphics overclocking
251
00:07:55,039 --> 00:07:58,080
this menu isn't very fleshed out it has
252
00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:00,479
two entries
253
00:07:58,080 --> 00:08:02,080
and that's it but as this is ahead of
254
00:08:00,479 --> 00:08:03,759
the official diy launch
255
00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:05,280
it's possible that this expands with
256
00:08:03,759 --> 00:08:07,759
other boards in the future
257
00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:09,280
the options are for graphics frequency
258
00:08:07,759 --> 00:08:11,120
and graphics core voltage
259
00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:12,800
both of which can be entered manually
260
00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:14,720
graphics frequency needs to be adjusted
261
00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,800
with the voltage for stability of course
262
00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:19,120
and gigabytes bios notes that graphics p
263
00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:20,720
states remain active when doing this
264
00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:22,639
bioalso also notes that the graphics
265
00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:24,879
voltage is derived from the soc
266
00:08:22,639 --> 00:08:26,720
or the uncore voltage rails we may try
267
00:08:24,879 --> 00:08:28,560
overclocking for a separate video but
268
00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:30,000
for now we'll be testing stock since
269
00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:31,680
that's how most people use these
270
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:33,440
installing the amd driver package
271
00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:35,839
includes the same software suite
272
00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:37,279
as what you'd get with an amd gpu it
273
00:08:35,839 --> 00:08:38,240
looks the same it's just got different
274
00:08:37,279 --> 00:08:39,839
options in it
275
00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:41,599
currently the drivers show the gpu
276
00:08:39,839 --> 00:08:44,800
frequency the temperature
277
00:08:41,599 --> 00:08:45,600
some cpu stats some specs fps and frame
278
00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:48,080
times
279
00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:49,680
but there's no options for tuning in our
280
00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:50,080
driver install at least and there aren't
281
00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:51,920
really
282
00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,760
any options for input in general you
283
00:08:51,920 --> 00:08:55,680
have to do all that in bios if you do
284
00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:58,240
any of it this chart plots the average
285
00:08:55,680 --> 00:08:59,360
all core frequency of the 5600x and the
286
00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:01,839
5600g
287
00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:02,800
useful for establishing how useful the
288
00:09:01,839 --> 00:09:05,839
5600g
289
00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:07,760
is as just a cpu the r55600g ends up
290
00:09:05,839 --> 00:09:08,000
plotting an average all core frequency
291
00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,160
during
292
00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:11,040
blender of about 4 300 megahertz with
293
00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:14,320
the 5600
294
00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:16,720
x at 4 400 megahertz the 5600x will
295
00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:18,399
outperform the 5600g when ignoring the
296
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:20,640
presence of the igp
297
00:09:18,399 --> 00:09:22,640
and you can see the 5600x finishes the
298
00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:23,440
work first as well that's why the line
299
00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:25,920
ends sooner
300
00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:27,600
so this emphasizes that point in single
301
00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:30,320
core testing with cinebench we monitored
302
00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:31,920
the r5 to 600g is at maximum single core
303
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:34,959
frequency per interval
304
00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:38,399
at a fairly flat 4440 megahertz compared
305
00:09:34,959 --> 00:09:41,120
to the 4650 megahertz on the r5 5600x
306
00:09:38,399 --> 00:09:43,360
the 5600x unsurprisingly is faster when
307
00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:44,959
used only as a cpu counter-strike global
308
00:09:43,360 --> 00:09:47,200
offensive starts us off for the game
309
00:09:44,959 --> 00:09:49,279
benchmarks in our new igp test suite
310
00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:51,440
we're testing at 1080p medium settings
311
00:09:49,279 --> 00:09:52,640
with a pretty wide mix of parts here
312
00:09:51,440 --> 00:09:54,160
and remember that some of these
313
00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:55,600
combinations are designed more for
314
00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:57,680
academic understanding
315
00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:59,040
of where the bottlenecks are rather than
316
00:09:57,680 --> 00:10:01,680
for practical use
317
00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:04,079
the r55600g does absolutely here we can
318
00:10:01,680 --> 00:10:06,399
refer to our pairing of the gt 1030 with
319
00:10:04,079 --> 00:10:07,360
an i9 10900k which obviously doesn't
320
00:10:06,399 --> 00:10:08,640
make sense but
321
00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:10,560
it's helpful for understanding the
322
00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:13,200
bottleneck it's the gpu
323
00:10:10,560 --> 00:10:14,560
the gt1030 simply is not as powerful as
324
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:16,640
the r55600g
325
00:10:14,560 --> 00:10:18,000
in this instance despite running an
326
00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:21,200
older vega architecture
327
00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:23,440
on amd's part the 260 dollar apu
328
00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:24,399
leads the similarly priced 10 100 plus
329
00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:27,440
gt 1030
330
00:10:24,399 --> 00:10:29,360
g5 pairing by about 12 that's impressive
331
00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:30,399
performance for andy's igp we don't
332
00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:32,720
normally see them
333
00:10:30,399 --> 00:10:34,720
match the same price to dgpu and cpu
334
00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:36,240
pairing as well as they're doing here
335
00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:38,640
and of course the gpu shortage isn't
336
00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:41,839
doing the dgpu option any favors
337
00:10:38,640 --> 00:10:42,480
the iris xe g7 combination in the intel
338
00:10:41,839 --> 00:10:45,519
nok
339
00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:47,040
ran at 81 fps average allowing amd elite
340
00:10:45,519 --> 00:10:50,160
of 47
341
00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:52,000
intel's uhd graphics 750 in the 11600 k
342
00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:54,320
ran at 60 fps average
343
00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:56,880
showing a gpu bind and allowed a
344
00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:59,600
significant lead in the 5600g
345
00:10:56,880 --> 00:11:00,560
as for the gt 1030 ddr4 you still
346
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,560
shouldn't buy it
347
00:11:00,560 --> 00:11:04,320
just like a few years ago but we can see
348
00:11:02,560 --> 00:11:05,279
it is better in the one percent low
349
00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:08,320
consistency
350
00:11:05,279 --> 00:11:10,399
than intel's uhd igps fortnite is next
351
00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:11,519
run at 1080p low for the widest support
352
00:11:10,399 --> 00:11:14,160
for comparisons
353
00:11:11,519 --> 00:11:15,200
the amd apu again leads this particular
354
00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:17,760
set of data
355
00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:18,720
of course a higher-end dgpu like a gtx
356
00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:22,160
1650
357
00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:23,839
would leave the radeon 7 apu but
358
00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:26,160
we're then outside of a direct price
359
00:11:23,839 --> 00:11:27,120
match and it's not really the same type
360
00:11:26,160 --> 00:11:29,760
of comparison
361
00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:31,120
the apu is roughly equal to the gt 1030
362
00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:33,279
gddr5 card
363
00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:34,320
which is bottlenecking the 10900k and
364
00:11:33,279 --> 00:11:37,360
11600k
365
00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:39,200
cpus the 10100 illustrates this dropping
366
00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:40,480
only a few frames from the higher end to
367
00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:43,600
cpu pairings
368
00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:44,320
intel's integrated uhd 750 and the 630
369
00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:47,279
igps
370
00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:48,720
aren't even close to the gt 1030 gddr5
371
00:11:47,279 --> 00:11:50,320
or the 5600g
372
00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:52,560
you wouldn't get a good experience on
373
00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:56,320
those uhdi gps
374
00:11:52,560 --> 00:11:57,920
but for the gt 1030 g5 or the 5600g
375
00:11:56,320 --> 00:11:59,600
they're completely playable and they
376
00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:00,639
even allow a little bit of extra room
377
00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:02,320
for higher settings
378
00:12:00,639 --> 00:12:04,800
fortnite's performance mode is even
379
00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:06,720
easier to run and expectedly
380
00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:08,079
it looks even worse but that's the
381
00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:09,760
exchange for a higher frame rate
382
00:12:08,079 --> 00:12:11,120
this tells us something interesting that
383
00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:13,440
in this task we've become
384
00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:14,639
cpu bound rather than gpu bound as we
385
00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:17,600
saw in the first
386
00:12:14,639 --> 00:12:19,519
three charts the r55600g therefore falls
387
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:21,600
below the gt 1030 performance when
388
00:12:19,519 --> 00:12:23,279
combined with the higher performing cpus
389
00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:26,240
illustrating a potential weak spot for
390
00:12:23,279 --> 00:12:28,880
the apu the intel i3 10 100 and the gt
391
00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:31,480
1030 also maintain an edge gear
392
00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:33,839
at a 7.8 percent advantage over the
393
00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:36,240
r55600g for average fps
394
00:12:33,839 --> 00:12:38,399
this tells us that the r55600g won't
395
00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:41,040
always lead the i3 and 10 30
396
00:12:38,399 --> 00:12:41,600
g5 pairing that is although the ddr4
397
00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:43,200
version
398
00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:46,480
you should ignore in rocket league the
399
00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:49,600
gt 1030 gddr5 and the i3 10 100
400
00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:53,360
outperform the r55600g by about
401
00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:54,959
60 68 here forming a massive rift
402
00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:57,040
that we didn't see in some of the other
403
00:12:54,959 --> 00:12:58,560
games we'll need to analyze the hardware
404
00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:00,800
activity to better understand
405
00:12:58,560 --> 00:13:01,760
why this happens we retested and found
406
00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:03,600
the same results
407
00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:06,639
so the next thing we did was pair a gt
408
00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:07,519
1030 with the r5 5600g and then disable
409
00:13:06,639 --> 00:13:08,720
its igp
410
00:13:07,519 --> 00:13:10,639
to find the root cause of this
411
00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:13,839
difference it was the gpu
412
00:13:10,639 --> 00:13:15,120
the gt 1030 and the r55600g which is
413
00:13:13,839 --> 00:13:16,480
a pairing that you shouldn't do it
414
00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:17,040
doesn't really make sense financially
415
00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,680
but
416
00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:21,440
that propelled to 136 fps average that's
417
00:13:19,680 --> 00:13:24,160
a spike of 65
418
00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:26,720
from the vega gpu only in this instance
419
00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:28,880
the amd apu is weaker than a cheap cpu
420
00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:31,760
and d gpu assuming you can get them both
421
00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:33,360
but better than the 11th gen igps by a
422
00:13:31,760 --> 00:13:34,000
wide margin running hardware info
423
00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:35,519
logging during
424
00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:37,440
the same rocket league gameplay helps
425
00:13:35,519 --> 00:13:39,440
explain what's going on you can see the
426
00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:40,560
cpu utilization is only sitting around
427
00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:42,320
ten percent here
428
00:13:40,560 --> 00:13:44,320
a lot of people think this is a good
429
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:46,160
thing because they think it means they
430
00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,360
have more cpu threat availability for
431
00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:49,680
other tasks
432
00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:51,600
in fact utilization this low just means
433
00:13:49,680 --> 00:13:52,800
we have wasted resources incapable of
434
00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:55,440
serving a benefit
435
00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:56,000
for their primary current task the
436
00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:58,480
radeon
437
00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:59,360
gpu is fully loaded here and is clearly
438
00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:00,880
the bottleneck
439
00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:02,720
something has to be a bottleneck in
440
00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:04,880
every system so that's normal
441
00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:06,240
but it's balancing the two parts as
442
00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:08,160
close together as possible
443
00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:10,079
that helps get that better performance
444
00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:10,880
and in this instance the gpu is so
445
00:14:10,079 --> 00:14:12,399
heavily bound
446
00:14:10,880 --> 00:14:14,480
that we're not getting a lot of benefit
447
00:14:12,399 --> 00:14:16,079
out of the cpu minecraft isn't much of a
448
00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:18,399
benchmark but
449
00:14:16,079 --> 00:14:19,760
it and games like it are a great fit for
450
00:14:18,399 --> 00:14:22,320
these types of builds
451
00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:24,560
the i3 10 100 and gt 1030 do end up
452
00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:27,120
ahead running at 115 fps average so the
453
00:14:24,560 --> 00:14:30,880
r5 3600g is 100 fps average
454
00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:34,160
for a total of 14.6 advantaged
455
00:14:30,880 --> 00:14:35,440
the iris xe g7 from the intel nook the
456
00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:39,120
new one is next
457
00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:42,320
with the uhd 750 on the 11 600k
458
00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:42,959
down at 75 fps average that's definitely
459
00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:44,800
playable
460
00:14:42,959 --> 00:14:46,399
if you want to stop gap while you're
461
00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:49,120
waiting for a gpu and
462
00:14:46,399 --> 00:14:50,880
you already want this cpu but if you're
463
00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:52,240
not planning to
464
00:14:50,880 --> 00:14:54,880
use this thing other than for a
465
00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:56,240
temporary solution amd's igp holds a
466
00:14:54,880 --> 00:14:58,240
significant 53
467
00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:00,079
advantage and obviously going with the
468
00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:00,800
dgpu kind of makes both of these
469
00:15:00,079 --> 00:15:03,440
irrelevant
470
00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:04,480
but that's a fantasy land at this point
471
00:15:03,440 --> 00:15:07,120
because they're hard to get
472
00:15:04,480 --> 00:15:08,880
the gt 1030 is actually struggling to
473
00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:10,399
fight with amd's apu here
474
00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,600
and that's the part that's a little bit
475
00:15:10,399 --> 00:15:12,000
different from some of the other ones
476
00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:13,920
we've looked
477
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,839
at in the past transitioning briefly to
478
00:15:13,920 --> 00:15:16,480
cpu only production benchmarks will be
479
00:15:15,839 --> 00:15:18,399
our next
480
00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:21,360
set of charts in blender all core
481
00:15:18,399 --> 00:15:22,480
rendering the amd r55600g required 25
482
00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:25,680
minutes to complete
483
00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:28,880
which has it about on par with an amdr
484
00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:31,519
six core 12 thread part the i5 11 600k
485
00:15:28,880 --> 00:15:34,399
outperformed the 5600g by a few minutes
486
00:15:31,519 --> 00:15:35,759
with the r5 3600x requiring 11 percent
487
00:15:34,399 --> 00:15:38,399
less time to render
488
00:15:35,759 --> 00:15:41,680
than the 5600g adobe premiere aggregate
489
00:15:38,399 --> 00:15:43,279
scoring has the r5 5600g at 695 points
490
00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:45,120
allowing the 5600x an
491
00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:47,040
overall performance lead of about 6.2
492
00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:48,240
percent and cpu bound tasks like
493
00:15:47,040 --> 00:15:49,839
rendering and scrubbing
494
00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:52,240
keep in mind that this is tested with
495
00:15:49,839 --> 00:15:54,079
the same rtx 3080 in all configurations
496
00:15:52,240 --> 00:15:57,199
on the same ram so we're looking at
497
00:15:54,079 --> 00:16:00,000
cpu differences here the 5600g is more
498
00:15:57,199 --> 00:16:02,639
similar to the 3600 or the 3700x
499
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:04,320
than to the modern 5600x in performance
500
00:16:02,639 --> 00:16:07,279
intel's 10 700k
501
00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:08,639
leads at 740 points roughly tied with
502
00:16:07,279 --> 00:16:12,320
the 5600x
503
00:16:08,639 --> 00:16:15,360
with its 11 600k closer to the 5600g
504
00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:16,959
the 5600g is reasonably close to 5600x
505
00:16:15,360 --> 00:16:18,959
if you can't find one in stock
506
00:16:16,959 --> 00:16:21,120
but then the 3600 isn't much different
507
00:16:18,959 --> 00:16:23,199
either the cheaper of these two wins if
508
00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:26,320
you only need a cpu in chromium code
509
00:16:23,199 --> 00:16:27,360
compile the r55600g required 147 minutes
510
00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:30,399
an hour benchmark
511
00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:32,399
versus the 5600x is 131 minutes
512
00:16:30,399 --> 00:16:33,680
that's back to the 11 reduction time
513
00:16:32,399 --> 00:16:35,600
required that we saw in blender
514
00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:36,720
the 3600 takes about six and a half
515
00:16:35,600 --> 00:16:38,880
percent less time
516
00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:40,639
with the 11 600k leading more
517
00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:44,160
significantly at a 16
518
00:16:40,639 --> 00:16:46,320
reduction the 5600g leads the 11400 by
519
00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:47,920
a similar 16 reduction we have other
520
00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:49,600
production benchmarks complete but
521
00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:51,920
they're all about the same as these
522
00:16:49,600 --> 00:16:52,639
that includes photoshop 7-zip handbrake
523
00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:55,199
and others
524
00:16:52,639 --> 00:16:57,440
but the pattern persists moving back to
525
00:16:55,199 --> 00:16:58,000
games we'll look at how the 5600g does
526
00:16:57,440 --> 00:16:59,839
when
527
00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:01,040
all of the cpus are tested and paired
528
00:16:59,839 --> 00:17:03,360
with the same hardware
529
00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:04,640
including the gpu so no igp's allowed
530
00:17:03,360 --> 00:17:06,640
the 5600g
531
00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:08,480
really isn't meant to be used this way
532
00:17:06,640 --> 00:17:10,640
but if you were to buy one now as maybe
533
00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:12,400
a stop gap and add a gpu later
534
00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:14,480
this gives you a better idea for the
535
00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:17,280
maximum that the cpu
536
00:17:14,480 --> 00:17:18,559
will allow out of the gpu in rainbow six
537
00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:22,559
siege at 1080p
538
00:17:18,559 --> 00:17:25,520
the r55600g matched with the rtx 3080
539
00:17:22,559 --> 00:17:27,199
ends up at 393 fps average with lows
540
00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:27,919
slightly out of proportion versus the
541
00:17:27,199 --> 00:17:31,440
immediate
542
00:17:27,919 --> 00:17:32,480
r7 3700x and i5 11400 neighbors but
543
00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:35,760
overall they're similar
544
00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:36,960
the r55600x leads the 5600g by 16
545
00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:40,080
percent in this one
546
00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:43,520
the i5 11 400 and 10 600k are both
547
00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:46,400
roughly six percent ahead the r5 3600
548
00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:48,640
allows the 5600g a slight lead but
549
00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:50,559
if you can find a 3600 for significantly
550
00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:52,640
cheaper than a 5600g
551
00:17:50,559 --> 00:17:54,880
and you don't need its igp you'd get
552
00:17:52,640 --> 00:17:57,120
mostly the same performance the 3600
553
00:17:54,880 --> 00:17:59,200
being older and without an igp at all
554
00:17:57,120 --> 00:18:02,320
does have different disadvantages though
555
00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:04,640
at 1440p the amd cpu slam into a wall of
556
00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:05,360
about 340 fps average with the nvidia
557
00:18:04,640 --> 00:18:07,440
gpu
558
00:18:05,360 --> 00:18:10,160
where we see everything from the 5600x
559
00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:10,720
to the 5950x with an average fps error
560
00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:13,440
due to
561
00:18:10,720 --> 00:18:14,320
a bottleneck the r55600g is able to
562
00:18:13,440 --> 00:18:16,960
catch up here
563
00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:18,799
where the gpu bind reduces the 5600x's
564
00:18:16,960 --> 00:18:21,520
advantage to 5
565
00:18:18,799 --> 00:18:23,039
that's the nature of a gpu bind the cpu
566
00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:24,880
obviously doesn't matter as much
567
00:18:23,039 --> 00:18:27,039
cyberpunk is of course more relevant
568
00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:27,760
than ever thanks to tesla's use of it on
569
00:18:27,039 --> 00:18:29,520
stage
570
00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:32,000
although we don't have a test the model
571
00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:35,280
s plaid listed in this benchmark charge
572
00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:37,520
we can at least show the 5600g the 5600g
573
00:18:35,280 --> 00:18:38,960
ran at 132fps average with those
574
00:18:37,520 --> 00:18:41,520
proportional to that
575
00:18:38,960 --> 00:18:42,799
that places it ahead of the 3700x by
576
00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:46,480
about seven and a half percent
577
00:18:42,799 --> 00:18:47,200
with the 11400 leading the 5600g by 6.7
578
00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:49,760
percent
579
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:51,200
and the 5600x leading the 5600 ge by
580
00:18:49,760 --> 00:18:52,960
16.5
581
00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:55,840
that's similar to what we saw in rainbow
582
00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:58,720
six at 1080p in red that too the 5600g
583
00:18:55,840 --> 00:19:00,320
ran at 147 fps average with lows at 79
584
00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:02,480
and 68 fps
585
00:19:00,320 --> 00:19:03,520
that allows the 5600x a lead in all
586
00:19:02,480 --> 00:19:06,559
three metrics
587
00:19:03,520 --> 00:19:09,440
and about 11 on average that has the
588
00:19:06,559 --> 00:19:11,919
5600g outdone by the 11400
589
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:13,919
but it's out doing the r5 3600 and the
590
00:19:11,919 --> 00:19:16,480
r7 3700x marginally
591
00:19:13,919 --> 00:19:18,880
f1 2020 runs a comically high frame rate
592
00:19:16,480 --> 00:19:22,400
when cpu bound much like in rainbow six
593
00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:24,720
and has the 5600g at 254 fps average
594
00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:26,080
with lows around 100 fps at the worst
595
00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:28,080
for the 0.1 percent
596
00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:30,799
this is obviously completely playable in
597
00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:33,200
terms of a relative comparison the 5600x
598
00:19:30,799 --> 00:19:35,200
benefits from a lead of 26
599
00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:37,120
more noteworthy than some of these other
600
00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:40,400
games while the 10600k
601
00:19:37,120 --> 00:19:42,320
ends up closer to parity with the 5600g
602
00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:44,160
the 11400 just for reference of
603
00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,039
something kind of on the cheaper end for
604
00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:47,760
intel
605
00:19:45,039 --> 00:19:49,280
is also about equal to the 5600g right
606
00:19:47,760 --> 00:19:50,400
now although it's a little long on the
607
00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:52,720
tooth gta 5
608
00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:54,799
is useful for understanding how cpus
609
00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:56,240
treat an older style build of game
610
00:19:54,799 --> 00:19:59,200
especially dx11
611
00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:59,679
with limited use beyond four threads gta
612
00:19:59,200 --> 00:20:02,880
5
613
00:19:59,679 --> 00:20:06,080
is definitely that game the r55600g
614
00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:09,120
ran at 115 fps average establishing
615
00:20:06,080 --> 00:20:12,159
a 17.8 percent advantage for the 5600
616
00:20:09,120 --> 00:20:15,200
x and about the same for the 11 600k
617
00:20:12,159 --> 00:20:17,200
the 115 fps average result is also near
618
00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:19,280
the intel i5 10 600k
619
00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:21,360
stock result power consumption is up now
620
00:20:19,280 --> 00:20:22,960
this is tested at the eps 12 volts
621
00:20:21,360 --> 00:20:25,039
cables so you're looking at the numbers
622
00:20:22,960 --> 00:20:27,039
before the vrm efficiency losses
623
00:20:25,039 --> 00:20:28,640
but after the wall that means we don't
624
00:20:27,039 --> 00:20:30,159
have any measurement of the gpu power
625
00:20:28,640 --> 00:20:32,080
consumption for this set of tests
626
00:20:30,159 --> 00:20:34,000
but we have a special set of power
627
00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:36,400
consumption tests we'll look at next
628
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:38,000
this is with the rtx 3080 running so
629
00:20:36,400 --> 00:20:39,720
it's entirely cpu bound
630
00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:42,640
in a blender cpu only workload the
631
00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:44,159
r55600g pulled about 72 watts in the
632
00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:46,240
b550 pro board
633
00:20:44,159 --> 00:20:49,039
that's close to the 67 watts we observed
634
00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:50,960
in the x570 master since the motherboard
635
00:20:49,039 --> 00:20:52,080
had to change by necessity to support
636
00:20:50,960 --> 00:20:53,840
the apu
637
00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:55,840
we're not fully like for like between
638
00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:57,679
the 5600x and the jeep
639
00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:59,039
but we can call these functionally the
640
00:20:57,679 --> 00:21:02,240
same the 11400
641
00:20:59,039 --> 00:21:03,440
68 watts for comparison and the 3600 was
642
00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,679
closer to 80 watts
643
00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:07,679
remember that the igp again isn't doing
644
00:21:05,679 --> 00:21:09,280
much of anything here in cinebench r20
645
00:21:07,679 --> 00:21:10,799
tested within tau for intel
646
00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:13,840
so showing higher power consumption
647
00:21:10,799 --> 00:21:14,559
where applicable we see the 5600g at 77
648
00:21:13,840 --> 00:21:17,280
watts
649
00:21:14,559 --> 00:21:18,159
for the uh comparison of 66 with the
650
00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:20,720
5600
651
00:21:18,159 --> 00:21:22,799
x this was only a 5 watt or so increase
652
00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:24,320
over blender for the 5600g
653
00:21:22,799 --> 00:21:26,000
and it was repeatable but it's also a
654
00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:27,520
different application and it's not that
655
00:21:26,000 --> 00:21:29,039
crazy of a difference so this all makes
656
00:21:27,520 --> 00:21:30,000
sense for single core rendering and
657
00:21:29,039 --> 00:21:32,640
cinebench r20
658
00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:35,919
the 5600g pulled about 16 watts while
659
00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:37,679
the 5600 x was closer to 22 to 23 watts
660
00:21:35,919 --> 00:21:39,520
power consumption in a fully cpu
661
00:21:37,679 --> 00:21:42,159
constrained single core scenario was
662
00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:44,799
exceptionally low for the 5600g here we
663
00:21:42,159 --> 00:21:45,360
mixed in a new one-off test for the apus
664
00:21:44,799 --> 00:21:46,799
as well
665
00:21:45,360 --> 00:21:49,120
in this one we're measuring mixed
666
00:21:46,799 --> 00:21:50,799
workload power consumption with gaming
667
00:21:49,120 --> 00:21:52,720
this is rather than using the cpu
668
00:21:50,799 --> 00:21:53,600
targeted power draw with a d gpu
669
00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:56,559
previously
670
00:21:53,600 --> 00:21:58,480
the r55600g pulled between 32 and 40
671
00:21:56,559 --> 00:22:00,880
watts at the eps 12 volt cables
672
00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:02,720
that's when in a workload combining both
673
00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:05,120
cpu and gpu utilization
674
00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:06,880
on the same chip of course and in the
675
00:22:05,120 --> 00:22:08,080
more gpu bound conditions like rocket
676
00:22:06,880 --> 00:22:11,120
league or gta
677
00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:12,960
at 1440 we saw lower or slightly lower
678
00:22:11,120 --> 00:22:14,000
power consumption than in the more cpu
679
00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:16,320
bound conditions
680
00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:17,520
because none of these are 100 workloads
681
00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:20,000
on the cpu
682
00:22:17,520 --> 00:22:21,840
given that the igp is doing work here we
683
00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:23,520
don't see power consumption as high as
684
00:22:21,840 --> 00:22:25,520
the previous cpu only charts
685
00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:26,880
the gpu appears to be the more limiting
686
00:22:25,520 --> 00:22:29,039
of the two components
687
00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:29,919
and again something has to limit you
688
00:22:29,039 --> 00:22:31,919
eventually
689
00:22:29,919 --> 00:22:32,960
it just happens to be the igp in this
690
00:22:31,919 --> 00:22:34,640
coupling of the two
691
00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:36,640
just as some final validation we'll look
692
00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:36,960
at the igp frequency to check whether
693
00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:38,880
the
694
00:22:36,960 --> 00:22:40,480
software reads it accurately and whether
695
00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:43,919
everything is working as it should
696
00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:45,360
and this 5600g spec list the gpu clock
697
00:22:43,919 --> 00:22:46,880
at 1900 megahertz
698
00:22:45,360 --> 00:22:48,880
and looking at our testing during some
699
00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:50,320
rocket league gameplay we landed at
700
00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:51,679
exactly 1900.
701
00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:53,280
it didn't deviate at all at least
702
00:22:51,679 --> 00:22:55,520
according to the software and it stayed
703
00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:57,600
at flat 1900 whenever under load so
704
00:22:55,520 --> 00:22:59,520
that's it for the rfi 5600g ap
705
00:22:57,600 --> 00:23:01,280
review if you're looking at buying this
706
00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:03,280
thing either in the future
707
00:23:01,280 --> 00:23:05,360
first of all check back but either in
708
00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:07,440
the future is a standalone solution or
709
00:23:05,360 --> 00:23:08,240
an oem pre-built right now again you can
710
00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:09,919
find them on
711
00:23:08,240 --> 00:23:11,919
hp for example pretty easily at least we
712
00:23:09,919 --> 00:23:16,480
were able to then
713
00:23:11,919 --> 00:23:16,799
the 5600g is a relatively capable cpu
714
00:23:16,480 --> 00:23:19,440
but
715
00:23:16,799 --> 00:23:21,679
it's not quite as powerful as the 5600x
716
00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:23,039
and a lot of the cpu only tasks like in
717
00:23:21,679 --> 00:23:25,440
things such as blender
718
00:23:23,039 --> 00:23:26,080
premiere where we're testing for cpu
719
00:23:25,440 --> 00:23:28,080
performance
720
00:23:26,080 --> 00:23:30,720
and ignoring the presence of the apu the
721
00:23:28,080 --> 00:23:32,799
igp in those tasks
722
00:23:30,720 --> 00:23:35,280
we end up with a cpu that's roughly in
723
00:23:32,799 --> 00:23:37,200
the range of say an r5 3600
724
00:23:35,280 --> 00:23:38,320
sometimes the 10 600k depending on what
725
00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:40,559
application you're looking at
726
00:23:38,320 --> 00:23:42,320
so it is definitely not a drop in
727
00:23:40,559 --> 00:23:43,840
replacement for a 5600x
728
00:23:42,320 --> 00:23:45,360
runs a little bit slower maybe that'll
729
00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:47,840
change in the future but
730
00:23:45,360 --> 00:23:49,200
as it exists now that's where it lands
731
00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:50,159
and the cpu
732
00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:52,240
isn't really a thing that's going to
733
00:23:50,159 --> 00:23:53,679
change with drivers zen 3's
734
00:23:52,240 --> 00:23:56,240
fairly mature at this point so it's the
735
00:23:53,679 --> 00:23:58,159
bios and the frequencies are running at
736
00:23:56,240 --> 00:24:00,240
amd spec so we really don't suspect the
737
00:23:58,159 --> 00:24:02,159
cpu performance will move much at all
738
00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:04,080
and so you'll end up where if you just
739
00:24:02,159 --> 00:24:06,400
want a cpu and you want a six core 12
740
00:24:04,080 --> 00:24:07,600
thread one and you can find a 5600x
741
00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:10,000
you should just probably just buy that
742
00:24:07,600 --> 00:24:11,600
instead but if you need the
743
00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:13,360
igp component that's where it gets more
744
00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:15,440
interesting so as
745
00:24:13,360 --> 00:24:17,039
a combined unit you end up with
746
00:24:15,440 --> 00:24:19,600
performance roughly
747
00:24:17,039 --> 00:24:21,760
in the range in some games of a 10 100
748
00:24:19,600 --> 00:24:25,039
plus a gt 1030 gddr5
749
00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:26,640
not ddr4 version uh or sometimes behind
750
00:24:25,039 --> 00:24:29,520
it and it does depend on the game
751
00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:30,400
the gpu as we found in the testing today
752
00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:33,120
the
753
00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:34,240
cus in here from vega are definitely the
754
00:24:33,120 --> 00:24:38,240
weakest point of it
755
00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:40,559
the cpu does well and it's the igp that
756
00:24:38,240 --> 00:24:42,159
ends up bottlenecking if you bottleneck
757
00:24:40,559 --> 00:24:44,799
in gaming there are some breakouts from
758
00:24:42,159 --> 00:24:45,600
that and extremely cpu bound games for
759
00:24:44,799 --> 00:24:48,240
the most part
760
00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:49,520
it's an igp limitation so then the apus
761
00:24:48,240 --> 00:24:52,000
end up being something that
762
00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:54,000
you can actually use these days to play
763
00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:55,919
games at reasonable settings
764
00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:57,120
it's once you start getting into higher
765
00:24:55,919 --> 00:25:00,159
end stuff
766
00:24:57,120 --> 00:25:01,200
we call it aaa typically where they'll
767
00:25:00,159 --> 00:25:02,400
start to struggle
768
00:25:01,200 --> 00:25:05,440
and you're going to have a hard time
769
00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:07,520
running graphic settings that are
770
00:25:05,440 --> 00:25:08,799
good looking in games like say red dead
771
00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:11,200
2 or
772
00:25:08,799 --> 00:25:12,559
cyberpunk 2077 i'll be everything
773
00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:13,760
struggles with that game
774
00:25:12,559 --> 00:25:15,919
but you'll have a little more trouble
775
00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:17,360
running the the higher quality games
776
00:25:15,919 --> 00:25:19,919
with higher quality graphics
777
00:25:17,360 --> 00:25:21,600
and that's the nature of something that
778
00:25:19,919 --> 00:25:24,559
is both a cpu and a gpu
779
00:25:21,600 --> 00:25:25,440
in this package size can't expect the
780
00:25:24,559 --> 00:25:27,360
world from it
781
00:25:25,440 --> 00:25:28,799
but these are far better than they used
782
00:25:27,360 --> 00:25:30,799
to be and it's something you could
783
00:25:28,799 --> 00:25:32,159
actually use to play games now
784
00:25:30,799 --> 00:25:33,679
whether or not it makes sense it's going
785
00:25:32,159 --> 00:25:35,200
to depend on the price we buy it with an
786
00:25:33,679 --> 00:25:36,799
oem system well that's
787
00:25:35,200 --> 00:25:38,960
we can't really judge that because those
788
00:25:36,799 --> 00:25:39,600
parts are all completely variable and
789
00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:41,039
there's
790
00:25:39,600 --> 00:25:43,360
at least seven eight other components in
791
00:25:41,039 --> 00:25:44,400
there so you'll need to evaluate that
792
00:25:43,360 --> 00:25:46,320
system by system
793
00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:48,400
as a standalone part it's not worth the
794
00:25:46,320 --> 00:25:50,240
scalper prices do not pay that money for
795
00:25:48,400 --> 00:25:52,320
it you'd be better off getting
796
00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:54,080
an intel or an amd cpu standalone or an
797
00:25:52,320 --> 00:25:55,760
intel one if you need the igp as
798
00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:57,520
a stop gap but the igp is much worse
799
00:25:55,760 --> 00:25:59,279
than this or
800
00:25:57,520 --> 00:26:01,200
you'd be better off waiting for this to
801
00:25:59,279 --> 00:26:02,960
launch the diy or buying the pre-built
802
00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,919
that's another option too so that's it
803
00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:04,320
for this one thanks for watching as
804
00:26:03,919 --> 00:26:05,919
always
805
00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:07,200
subscribe for more check back for
806
00:26:05,919 --> 00:26:09,120
follow-ups on this there's a lot of
807
00:26:07,200 --> 00:26:11,600
interesting stuff we can do with apus
808
00:26:09,120 --> 00:26:13,279
we don't have a really firm conclusion
809
00:26:11,600 --> 00:26:14,080
on this as a diy part right now just
810
00:26:13,279 --> 00:26:16,000
because you
811
00:26:14,080 --> 00:26:17,360
can't officially buy it that way so
812
00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:20,559
we'll reevaluate
813
00:26:17,360 --> 00:26:22,360
as amd perhaps for the diy launch but as
814
00:26:20,559 --> 00:26:23,919
always check back for more you can go to
815
00:26:22,360 --> 00:26:24,480
store.gamersnexus.net if you'd like to
816
00:26:23,919 --> 00:26:26,880
grab
817
00:26:24,480 --> 00:26:28,080
some of our shirts like these pc
818
00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:31,120
shortage t-shirts
819
00:26:28,080 --> 00:26:33,200
or you can go to patreon.comgamersnexus
820
00:26:31,120 --> 00:26:36,640
to get behind the scenes videos thanks
821
00:26:33,200 --> 00:26:36,640
for watching we'll see you all next time
57816
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.