All language subtitles for AMD Ryzen 5 5600G APU Review & Benchmarks_ $260 CPU + GPU (vs. 5600X & More)-en

af Afrikaans
ak Akan
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bem Bemba
bn Bengali
bh Bihari
bs Bosnian
br Breton
bg Bulgarian
km Cambodian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
chr Cherokee
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian Download
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
ee Ewe
fo Faroese
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gaa Ga
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gn Guarani
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ia Interlingua
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
rw Kinyarwanda
rn Kirundi
kg Kongo
ko Korean
kri Krio (Sierra Leone)
ku Kurdish
ckb Kurdish (Soranî)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Laothian
la Latin
lv Latvian
ln Lingala
lt Lithuanian
loz Lozi
lg Luganda
ach Luo
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mfe Mauritian Creole
mo Moldavian
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
sr-ME Montenegrin
ne Nepali
pcm Nigerian Pidgin
nso Northern Sotho
no Norwegian
nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
oc Occitan
or Oriya
om Oromo
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt-BR Portuguese (Brazil)
pt Portuguese (Portugal)
pa Punjabi
qu Quechua
ro Romanian
rm Romansh
nyn Runyakitara
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
sh Serbo-Croatian
st Sesotho
tn Setswana
crs Seychellois Creole
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhalese
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
es-419 Spanish (Latin American)
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
tt Tatar
te Telugu
th Thai
ti Tigrinya
to Tonga
lua Tshiluba
tum Tumbuka
tr Turkish
tk Turkmen
tw Twi
ug Uighur
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
wo Wolof
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 0 00:00:00,030 --> 00:00:03,520 [Music] 1 00:00:01,760 --> 00:00:05,359 today we're reviewing an amd 2 00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:06,879 apu that doesn't come out officially for 3 00:00:05,359 --> 00:00:08,559 another two months but it's been 4 00:00:06,879 --> 00:00:10,240 floating around in the oem pre-built 5 00:00:08,559 --> 00:00:14,320 market for a little while now and that 6 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:15,679 is the 5600g so it's an r5 apu 7 00:00:14,320 --> 00:00:17,440 that means it has vega graphics 8 00:00:15,679 --> 00:00:20,160 integrated it's not rdna 9 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:22,240 and it also means that it's minimally a 10 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:24,800 stop gap if you don't have a gpu 11 00:00:22,240 --> 00:00:26,000 to potentially a reasonable solution for 12 00:00:24,800 --> 00:00:27,279 certain types of gaming 13 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,880 so we're going to be reviewing that of 14 00:00:27,279 --> 00:00:30,480 course we'll review the time machine we 15 00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:33,680 use to get this later 16 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:36,399 but we'll start with the amd 5600g and 17 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:37,920 the 260 dollar price bracket for an apu 18 00:00:36,399 --> 00:00:39,920 before that this video is brought to you 19 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,840 by keoxia said to be the original 20 00:00:39,920 --> 00:00:43,680 inventors of nand flash memory and 21 00:00:41,840 --> 00:00:45,200 formerly known as toshiba memory 22 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:48,239 kiouksia's xg6 23 00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:50,559 m.2 ssd is a high-end nvme ssd claiming 24 00:00:48,239 --> 00:00:52,879 up to 3180 megabytes per second read and 25 00:00:50,559 --> 00:00:53,920 2960 megabytes per second write speeds 26 00:00:52,879 --> 00:00:55,520 sequentially 27 00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:57,199 and it's ideally used in high 28 00:00:55,520 --> 00:01:00,399 performance gaming pcs 29 00:00:57,199 --> 00:01:02,079 or power conscious laptops the xg6 is 30 00:01:00,399 --> 00:01:05,199 available up to one terabyte 31 00:01:02,079 --> 00:01:08,479 and the company also has its bg4 ssd 32 00:01:05,199 --> 00:01:10,560 in a much smaller m.2 2230 form factor 33 00:01:08,479 --> 00:01:12,000 for up to one terabyte of ultra compact 34 00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:13,840 storage learn more about 35 00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:15,200 keoxia at the links in the description 36 00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:17,200 below including 37 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,799 about their enterprise storage products 38 00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:19,680 so some basics for these these are 39 00:01:18,799 --> 00:01:21,439 actually available 40 00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:23,920 they are being sold in pre-built and if 41 00:01:21,439 --> 00:01:25,439 you check amd's website for the 5600g 42 00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:27,920 it actually lists the official launch 43 00:01:25,439 --> 00:01:31,040 date as march 13th or so 44 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:32,159 of this year but the official launch 45 00:01:31,040 --> 00:01:34,240 date to the 46 00:01:32,159 --> 00:01:35,840 diy market as opposed to just the launch 47 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:38,560 date to the market in general 48 00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:40,320 is august 5th so it's a little ways away 49 00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:42,399 because this is a retail available 50 00:01:40,320 --> 00:01:44,240 product we're under no obligations from 51 00:01:42,399 --> 00:01:45,520 amd in terms of embargoes or anything 52 00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:47,360 like that 53 00:01:45,520 --> 00:01:49,280 and it also means that it's a finalized 54 00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:51,360 product to some extent but 55 00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:53,280 with a couple of months between when 56 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:54,960 these started shipping out to 57 00:01:53,280 --> 00:01:56,560 actual users who bought pre-built 58 00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:59,200 systems at retail 59 00:01:56,560 --> 00:02:00,960 and the time at which the diy systems or 60 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:03,040 diy parts come out separately 61 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:04,560 it's possible that there are iterative 62 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:05,920 changes in drivers 63 00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:08,080 or in the silicone quality or something 64 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:10,640 like that so we'll revisit these as 65 00:02:08,080 --> 00:02:11,520 we get in the uh more official diy part 66 00:02:10,640 --> 00:02:13,040 review samples 67 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,879 we don't suspect there to be any major 68 00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:16,239 changes because again this is something 69 00:02:14,879 --> 00:02:17,680 that you can actually buy it's not like 70 00:02:16,239 --> 00:02:19,520 we went through back channels to get it 71 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,040 you can just buy it on the market openly 72 00:02:19,520 --> 00:02:22,239 if you especially if you go through like 73 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:24,239 hp or someone who 74 00:02:22,239 --> 00:02:25,920 carries it in larger quantities couple 75 00:02:24,239 --> 00:02:27,440 of notes here if you go to try and buy 76 00:02:25,920 --> 00:02:28,720 one of these standalone right now as 77 00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:30,879 opposed to through 78 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:32,080 a pre-built system you're probably going 79 00:02:30,879 --> 00:02:34,879 to pay scalper prices 80 00:02:32,080 --> 00:02:36,000 and cpus are not being as heavily scaled 81 00:02:34,879 --> 00:02:37,680 as gpus 82 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:40,400 we've been able at least in the u.s 83 00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:43,040 market where we check to find 5 800 x's 84 00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:44,160 5600 x's or some variant of a 10 series 85 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:46,560 intel cpu 86 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:48,239 in stock close to msrp or below it in 87 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:50,319 intel's cases a lot of time 88 00:02:48,239 --> 00:02:51,280 pretty regularly now for a few months so 89 00:02:50,319 --> 00:02:53,360 don't pay scalp 90 00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:54,720 prices if you can avoid it for something 91 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:56,720 like an apu 92 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:58,400 because there are other parts out there 93 00:02:56,720 --> 00:02:58,800 and some of them even do have igps in 94 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:00,480 them 95 00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:02,400 so it's not quite as bad as the gpu 96 00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:03,200 market uh we're just trying to make sure 97 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:05,280 people don't 98 00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:06,400 rip themselves off by accident because 99 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:08,720 they see this review 100 00:03:06,400 --> 00:03:10,879 they see one of these on ebay for 500 101 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:12,959 and they buy it you shouldn't do that 102 00:03:10,879 --> 00:03:14,959 so these are supposed to be 260 parts 103 00:03:12,959 --> 00:03:17,120 when they come out for the 5600g 104 00:03:14,959 --> 00:03:18,879 a little more expensive for the 5700g 105 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:19,280 but there are normal cpus in stock as 106 00:03:18,879 --> 00:03:20,879 well 107 00:03:19,280 --> 00:03:22,879 again through retailers so the specs 108 00:03:20,879 --> 00:03:25,120 page from amd says it's a six core 12 109 00:03:22,879 --> 00:03:26,480 thread part that matches for the 56 110 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:29,440 naming like the 5600 111 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:30,480 x it says it has seven gpu cores or 112 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:33,519 compute units 113 00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:35,360 cus by amd's radeon terminology it's a 114 00:03:33,519 --> 00:03:37,680 65 watt tdp 115 00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:40,640 it has an adjustable tdp down to 45 116 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:41,360 watts and it runs a 3.9 to 4.4 gigahertz 117 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:43,440 base or 118 00:03:41,360 --> 00:03:44,799 boost for limited core boosting there's 119 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,560 a 1900 megahertz 120 00:03:44,799 --> 00:03:48,400 gpu spec and we'll check on that in 121 00:03:46,560 --> 00:03:50,000 benchmarking official memory support 122 00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:51,360 like the rest of zen three and this 123 00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:53,439 is zen three by the way it's seven 124 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:54,640 nanometers is 3200 megahertz you can 125 00:03:53,439 --> 00:03:57,280 overclock as desired 126 00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:58,799 we tested with our normal c14 3200 127 00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:01,519 megahertz with tuning 128 00:03:58,799 --> 00:04:02,400 uh trident zrgb kit as a reminder we've 129 00:04:01,519 --> 00:04:04,159 found that this 130 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,519 setup that we use for standardized 131 00:04:04,159 --> 00:04:07,760 testing on everything 132 00:04:05,519 --> 00:04:09,519 runs faster than a lot of the 3600 kits 133 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:10,959 so this is all standardized that means 134 00:04:09,519 --> 00:04:13,439 you can compare everything to each other 135 00:04:10,959 --> 00:04:16,320 from one igp from intel to amd's apus 136 00:04:13,439 --> 00:04:17,680 or between the cpu and dgpu combinations 137 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:20,079 if there's enough interest 138 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:20,880 and please let us know below we might 139 00:04:20,079 --> 00:04:22,800 look into 140 00:04:20,880 --> 00:04:24,400 a separate memory piece with the apu 141 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:25,680 specifically the reason that's been 142 00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:27,199 interesting in the past 143 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:29,120 is pretty simple it's because there's no 144 00:04:27,199 --> 00:04:29,680 onboard memory because it's not a video 145 00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:32,960 card 146 00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:34,400 and so that means when the cus in this 147 00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:36,000 need to get something out of memory 148 00:04:34,400 --> 00:04:37,040 they're traveling to system memory if 149 00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:39,520 they can't find it 150 00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:40,560 in a closer cache and traveling to 151 00:04:39,520 --> 00:04:43,520 system memory is 152 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:44,160 it's a further journey and uh the memory 153 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,400 is 154 00:04:44,160 --> 00:04:47,720 not particularly fast when you compare 155 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:51,360 against say 156 00:04:47,720 --> 00:04:54,400 gddr6x on a pcb that contains 157 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:56,400 the substrate for the gpu in a dgpu 158 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:58,080 solution in speaking with amd though 159 00:04:56,400 --> 00:05:00,560 previously the 160 00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:01,759 memory impact on these apus it sounds 161 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:02,240 like shouldn't be as severe as we've 162 00:05:01,759 --> 00:05:04,080 seen 163 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:05,680 sometimes in the past in fact amd's 164 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,600 charts that it presented during its 165 00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:09,759 keynote whenever it announced them were 166 00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:11,680 using 3200 megahertz memory but as a 167 00:05:09,759 --> 00:05:13,759 reminder i was just tuned the most maybe 168 00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:15,919 obvious competition with this would be 169 00:05:13,759 --> 00:05:18,000 a cheap cpu and dgpu that's normally the 170 00:05:15,919 --> 00:05:20,080 case the market is screwy now 171 00:05:18,000 --> 00:05:21,440 so it throws the pricing off but for the 172 00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:22,960 last week while we've been working on 173 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:25,039 this we've been consistently able to 174 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:28,880 find an intel i3 10 100 175 00:05:25,039 --> 00:05:32,160 in stock for about 125 to 140 depending 176 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:33,440 and a gt 1030 gddr5 version for about 177 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:36,000 120 bucks 178 00:05:33,440 --> 00:05:37,600 so that puts us in the range of 240 to 179 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:41,039 maybe 260 180 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:43,520 for the cpu plus dgpu cheap combination 181 00:05:41,039 --> 00:05:44,720 versus the 260 apu that would be the 182 00:05:43,520 --> 00:05:46,400 best comparison because 183 00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:47,759 in the past what we've been looking at 184 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:50,800 in a normal market is 185 00:05:47,759 --> 00:05:52,000 very simple it's if you have a really 186 00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:54,800 strict budget 187 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:56,000 do you buy an apu for something like 120 188 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:58,880 140 bucks 189 00:05:56,000 --> 00:06:00,160 or do you buy a cheap cpu and d gpu that 190 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:03,680 might be like a pentium 191 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:06,240 g 3568 or whatever it's called 192 00:06:03,680 --> 00:06:06,960 or it might be something like a cheap r3 193 00:06:06,240 --> 00:06:09,520 cpu 194 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:11,919 and some low end gpu often it would be a 195 00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:14,560 710 or a 1030 something in that class 196 00:06:11,919 --> 00:06:16,080 don't buy a ddr5 1030 by the way now 197 00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:18,560 there's a slightly different angle where 198 00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:21,360 aps are also a stop gap solution 199 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:22,400 if you need something to run anything 200 00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:24,560 while you wait for 201 00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:25,919 a more permanent gpu and so with the 202 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,840 5600g 203 00:06:25,919 --> 00:06:30,080 you end up with a cpu that's relatively 204 00:06:27,840 --> 00:06:31,919 powerful so that it doesn't become 205 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:34,479 useless when you do eventually upgrade 206 00:06:31,919 --> 00:06:36,080 it to a dedicated gpu you still have a 207 00:06:34,479 --> 00:06:38,400 six core 12 thread 208 00:06:36,080 --> 00:06:40,240 zen three ryzen part in there even if 209 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,759 the igp becomes worthless at that point 210 00:06:40,240 --> 00:06:42,400 let's get into some of the testing as a 211 00:06:41,759 --> 00:06:44,560 reminder 212 00:06:42,400 --> 00:06:46,400 this is an official product that means 213 00:06:44,560 --> 00:06:46,960 it is all working and it's something you 214 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:48,960 can buy 215 00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:50,560 through oams but it's also not 216 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:52,720 officially out through diy 217 00:06:50,560 --> 00:06:54,960 very strange situation so we will be 218 00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:57,360 revisiting this as things iterate 219 00:06:54,960 --> 00:06:59,120 and move towards diy launch let's start 220 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:00,800 with some validation testing 221 00:06:59,120 --> 00:07:02,240 before we get started with the testing 222 00:07:00,800 --> 00:07:04,080 some notes on the setup 223 00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:06,240 first off not every board will support 224 00:07:04,080 --> 00:07:08,160 these apus you'll obviously need 225 00:07:06,240 --> 00:07:11,280 on-board display out of some kind 226 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:13,199 usually hdmi in order to use the igp 227 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:14,880 but other than that it's pretty standard 228 00:07:13,199 --> 00:07:18,240 you'll also need a bios update to 229 00:07:14,880 --> 00:07:20,800 support the 5600g and 5700g our gigabyte 230 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:22,400 x570 master for example was unable to 231 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:24,080 boot with the 5600g 232 00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:27,280 so we had to switch over to a different 233 00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:28,400 board it's the gigabyte b550 aorus pro 234 00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:29,840 this isn't a big deal 235 00:07:28,400 --> 00:07:31,840 just if you're planning to buy a 236 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:32,240 pre-built system and rip the apu out of 237 00:07:31,840 --> 00:07:34,000 it 238 00:07:32,240 --> 00:07:35,680 check the cpu support list on the board 239 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:37,599 you're intending to use before you 240 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:39,280 commit to buying both of those things 241 00:07:37,599 --> 00:07:41,039 even if you intend on using a normal 242 00:07:39,280 --> 00:07:41,680 video card and never using integrated 243 00:07:41,039 --> 00:07:42,960 graphics 244 00:07:41,680 --> 00:07:45,440 you'll need to make sure the board is 245 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:47,440 compatible bios is mostly the same it's 246 00:07:45,440 --> 00:07:49,759 the usual amd overclocking options 247 00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:50,800 and gigabyte bios combination with the 248 00:07:49,759 --> 00:07:53,280 key difference being 249 00:07:50,800 --> 00:07:55,039 an amd overclocking sub page for 250 00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:57,360 integrated graphics overclocking 251 00:07:55,039 --> 00:07:58,080 this menu isn't very fleshed out it has 252 00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:00,479 two entries 253 00:07:58,080 --> 00:08:02,080 and that's it but as this is ahead of 254 00:08:00,479 --> 00:08:03,759 the official diy launch 255 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:05,280 it's possible that this expands with 256 00:08:03,759 --> 00:08:07,759 other boards in the future 257 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:09,280 the options are for graphics frequency 258 00:08:07,759 --> 00:08:11,120 and graphics core voltage 259 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:12,800 both of which can be entered manually 260 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:14,720 graphics frequency needs to be adjusted 261 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,800 with the voltage for stability of course 262 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:19,120 and gigabytes bios notes that graphics p 263 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:20,720 states remain active when doing this 264 00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:22,639 bioalso also notes that the graphics 265 00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:24,879 voltage is derived from the soc 266 00:08:22,639 --> 00:08:26,720 or the uncore voltage rails we may try 267 00:08:24,879 --> 00:08:28,560 overclocking for a separate video but 268 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:30,000 for now we'll be testing stock since 269 00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:31,680 that's how most people use these 270 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:33,440 installing the amd driver package 271 00:08:31,680 --> 00:08:35,839 includes the same software suite 272 00:08:33,440 --> 00:08:37,279 as what you'd get with an amd gpu it 273 00:08:35,839 --> 00:08:38,240 looks the same it's just got different 274 00:08:37,279 --> 00:08:39,839 options in it 275 00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:41,599 currently the drivers show the gpu 276 00:08:39,839 --> 00:08:44,800 frequency the temperature 277 00:08:41,599 --> 00:08:45,600 some cpu stats some specs fps and frame 278 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:48,080 times 279 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:49,680 but there's no options for tuning in our 280 00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:50,080 driver install at least and there aren't 281 00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:51,920 really 282 00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,760 any options for input in general you 283 00:08:51,920 --> 00:08:55,680 have to do all that in bios if you do 284 00:08:53,760 --> 00:08:58,240 any of it this chart plots the average 285 00:08:55,680 --> 00:08:59,360 all core frequency of the 5600x and the 286 00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:01,839 5600g 287 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:02,800 useful for establishing how useful the 288 00:09:01,839 --> 00:09:05,839 5600g 289 00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:07,760 is as just a cpu the r55600g ends up 290 00:09:05,839 --> 00:09:08,000 plotting an average all core frequency 291 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:10,160 during 292 00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:11,040 blender of about 4 300 megahertz with 293 00:09:10,160 --> 00:09:14,320 the 5600 294 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:16,720 x at 4 400 megahertz the 5600x will 295 00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:18,399 outperform the 5600g when ignoring the 296 00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:20,640 presence of the igp 297 00:09:18,399 --> 00:09:22,640 and you can see the 5600x finishes the 298 00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:23,440 work first as well that's why the line 299 00:09:22,640 --> 00:09:25,920 ends sooner 300 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:27,600 so this emphasizes that point in single 301 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:30,320 core testing with cinebench we monitored 302 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:31,920 the r5 to 600g is at maximum single core 303 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:34,959 frequency per interval 304 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:38,399 at a fairly flat 4440 megahertz compared 305 00:09:34,959 --> 00:09:41,120 to the 4650 megahertz on the r5 5600x 306 00:09:38,399 --> 00:09:43,360 the 5600x unsurprisingly is faster when 307 00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:44,959 used only as a cpu counter-strike global 308 00:09:43,360 --> 00:09:47,200 offensive starts us off for the game 309 00:09:44,959 --> 00:09:49,279 benchmarks in our new igp test suite 310 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:51,440 we're testing at 1080p medium settings 311 00:09:49,279 --> 00:09:52,640 with a pretty wide mix of parts here 312 00:09:51,440 --> 00:09:54,160 and remember that some of these 313 00:09:52,640 --> 00:09:55,600 combinations are designed more for 314 00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:57,680 academic understanding 315 00:09:55,600 --> 00:09:59,040 of where the bottlenecks are rather than 316 00:09:57,680 --> 00:10:01,680 for practical use 317 00:09:59,040 --> 00:10:04,079 the r55600g does absolutely here we can 318 00:10:01,680 --> 00:10:06,399 refer to our pairing of the gt 1030 with 319 00:10:04,079 --> 00:10:07,360 an i9 10900k which obviously doesn't 320 00:10:06,399 --> 00:10:08,640 make sense but 321 00:10:07,360 --> 00:10:10,560 it's helpful for understanding the 322 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:13,200 bottleneck it's the gpu 323 00:10:10,560 --> 00:10:14,560 the gt1030 simply is not as powerful as 324 00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:16,640 the r55600g 325 00:10:14,560 --> 00:10:18,000 in this instance despite running an 326 00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:21,200 older vega architecture 327 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:23,440 on amd's part the 260 dollar apu 328 00:10:21,200 --> 00:10:24,399 leads the similarly priced 10 100 plus 329 00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:27,440 gt 1030 330 00:10:24,399 --> 00:10:29,360 g5 pairing by about 12 that's impressive 331 00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:30,399 performance for andy's igp we don't 332 00:10:29,360 --> 00:10:32,720 normally see them 333 00:10:30,399 --> 00:10:34,720 match the same price to dgpu and cpu 334 00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:36,240 pairing as well as they're doing here 335 00:10:34,720 --> 00:10:38,640 and of course the gpu shortage isn't 336 00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:41,839 doing the dgpu option any favors 337 00:10:38,640 --> 00:10:42,480 the iris xe g7 combination in the intel 338 00:10:41,839 --> 00:10:45,519 nok 339 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:47,040 ran at 81 fps average allowing amd elite 340 00:10:45,519 --> 00:10:50,160 of 47 341 00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:52,000 intel's uhd graphics 750 in the 11600 k 342 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:54,320 ran at 60 fps average 343 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:56,880 showing a gpu bind and allowed a 344 00:10:54,320 --> 00:10:59,600 significant lead in the 5600g 345 00:10:56,880 --> 00:11:00,560 as for the gt 1030 ddr4 you still 346 00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:02,560 shouldn't buy it 347 00:11:00,560 --> 00:11:04,320 just like a few years ago but we can see 348 00:11:02,560 --> 00:11:05,279 it is better in the one percent low 349 00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:08,320 consistency 350 00:11:05,279 --> 00:11:10,399 than intel's uhd igps fortnite is next 351 00:11:08,320 --> 00:11:11,519 run at 1080p low for the widest support 352 00:11:10,399 --> 00:11:14,160 for comparisons 353 00:11:11,519 --> 00:11:15,200 the amd apu again leads this particular 354 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:17,760 set of data 355 00:11:15,200 --> 00:11:18,720 of course a higher-end dgpu like a gtx 356 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:22,160 1650 357 00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:23,839 would leave the radeon 7 apu but 358 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:26,160 we're then outside of a direct price 359 00:11:23,839 --> 00:11:27,120 match and it's not really the same type 360 00:11:26,160 --> 00:11:29,760 of comparison 361 00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:31,120 the apu is roughly equal to the gt 1030 362 00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:33,279 gddr5 card 363 00:11:31,120 --> 00:11:34,320 which is bottlenecking the 10900k and 364 00:11:33,279 --> 00:11:37,360 11600k 365 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:39,200 cpus the 10100 illustrates this dropping 366 00:11:37,360 --> 00:11:40,480 only a few frames from the higher end to 367 00:11:39,200 --> 00:11:43,600 cpu pairings 368 00:11:40,480 --> 00:11:44,320 intel's integrated uhd 750 and the 630 369 00:11:43,600 --> 00:11:47,279 igps 370 00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:48,720 aren't even close to the gt 1030 gddr5 371 00:11:47,279 --> 00:11:50,320 or the 5600g 372 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:52,560 you wouldn't get a good experience on 373 00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:56,320 those uhdi gps 374 00:11:52,560 --> 00:11:57,920 but for the gt 1030 g5 or the 5600g 375 00:11:56,320 --> 00:11:59,600 they're completely playable and they 376 00:11:57,920 --> 00:12:00,639 even allow a little bit of extra room 377 00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:02,320 for higher settings 378 00:12:00,639 --> 00:12:04,800 fortnite's performance mode is even 379 00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:06,720 easier to run and expectedly 380 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:08,079 it looks even worse but that's the 381 00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:09,760 exchange for a higher frame rate 382 00:12:08,079 --> 00:12:11,120 this tells us something interesting that 383 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:13,440 in this task we've become 384 00:12:11,120 --> 00:12:14,639 cpu bound rather than gpu bound as we 385 00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:17,600 saw in the first 386 00:12:14,639 --> 00:12:19,519 three charts the r55600g therefore falls 387 00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:21,600 below the gt 1030 performance when 388 00:12:19,519 --> 00:12:23,279 combined with the higher performing cpus 389 00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:26,240 illustrating a potential weak spot for 390 00:12:23,279 --> 00:12:28,880 the apu the intel i3 10 100 and the gt 391 00:12:26,240 --> 00:12:31,480 1030 also maintain an edge gear 392 00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:33,839 at a 7.8 percent advantage over the 393 00:12:31,480 --> 00:12:36,240 r55600g for average fps 394 00:12:33,839 --> 00:12:38,399 this tells us that the r55600g won't 395 00:12:36,240 --> 00:12:41,040 always lead the i3 and 10 30 396 00:12:38,399 --> 00:12:41,600 g5 pairing that is although the ddr4 397 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:43,200 version 398 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:46,480 you should ignore in rocket league the 399 00:12:43,200 --> 00:12:49,600 gt 1030 gddr5 and the i3 10 100 400 00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:53,360 outperform the r55600g by about 401 00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:54,959 60 68 here forming a massive rift 402 00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:57,040 that we didn't see in some of the other 403 00:12:54,959 --> 00:12:58,560 games we'll need to analyze the hardware 404 00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:00,800 activity to better understand 405 00:12:58,560 --> 00:13:01,760 why this happens we retested and found 406 00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:03,600 the same results 407 00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:06,639 so the next thing we did was pair a gt 408 00:13:03,600 --> 00:13:07,519 1030 with the r5 5600g and then disable 409 00:13:06,639 --> 00:13:08,720 its igp 410 00:13:07,519 --> 00:13:10,639 to find the root cause of this 411 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:13,839 difference it was the gpu 412 00:13:10,639 --> 00:13:15,120 the gt 1030 and the r55600g which is 413 00:13:13,839 --> 00:13:16,480 a pairing that you shouldn't do it 414 00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:17,040 doesn't really make sense financially 415 00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:19,680 but 416 00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:21,440 that propelled to 136 fps average that's 417 00:13:19,680 --> 00:13:24,160 a spike of 65 418 00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:26,720 from the vega gpu only in this instance 419 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:28,880 the amd apu is weaker than a cheap cpu 420 00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:31,760 and d gpu assuming you can get them both 421 00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:33,360 but better than the 11th gen igps by a 422 00:13:31,760 --> 00:13:34,000 wide margin running hardware info 423 00:13:33,360 --> 00:13:35,519 logging during 424 00:13:34,000 --> 00:13:37,440 the same rocket league gameplay helps 425 00:13:35,519 --> 00:13:39,440 explain what's going on you can see the 426 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:40,560 cpu utilization is only sitting around 427 00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:42,320 ten percent here 428 00:13:40,560 --> 00:13:44,320 a lot of people think this is a good 429 00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:46,160 thing because they think it means they 430 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,360 have more cpu threat availability for 431 00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:49,680 other tasks 432 00:13:47,360 --> 00:13:51,600 in fact utilization this low just means 433 00:13:49,680 --> 00:13:52,800 we have wasted resources incapable of 434 00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:55,440 serving a benefit 435 00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:56,000 for their primary current task the 436 00:13:55,440 --> 00:13:58,480 radeon 437 00:13:56,000 --> 00:13:59,360 gpu is fully loaded here and is clearly 438 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:00,880 the bottleneck 439 00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:02,720 something has to be a bottleneck in 440 00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:04,880 every system so that's normal 441 00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:06,240 but it's balancing the two parts as 442 00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:08,160 close together as possible 443 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:10,079 that helps get that better performance 444 00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:10,880 and in this instance the gpu is so 445 00:14:10,079 --> 00:14:12,399 heavily bound 446 00:14:10,880 --> 00:14:14,480 that we're not getting a lot of benefit 447 00:14:12,399 --> 00:14:16,079 out of the cpu minecraft isn't much of a 448 00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:18,399 benchmark but 449 00:14:16,079 --> 00:14:19,760 it and games like it are a great fit for 450 00:14:18,399 --> 00:14:22,320 these types of builds 451 00:14:19,760 --> 00:14:24,560 the i3 10 100 and gt 1030 do end up 452 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:27,120 ahead running at 115 fps average so the 453 00:14:24,560 --> 00:14:30,880 r5 3600g is 100 fps average 454 00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:34,160 for a total of 14.6 advantaged 455 00:14:30,880 --> 00:14:35,440 the iris xe g7 from the intel nook the 456 00:14:34,160 --> 00:14:39,120 new one is next 457 00:14:35,440 --> 00:14:42,320 with the uhd 750 on the 11 600k 458 00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:42,959 down at 75 fps average that's definitely 459 00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:44,800 playable 460 00:14:42,959 --> 00:14:46,399 if you want to stop gap while you're 461 00:14:44,800 --> 00:14:49,120 waiting for a gpu and 462 00:14:46,399 --> 00:14:50,880 you already want this cpu but if you're 463 00:14:49,120 --> 00:14:52,240 not planning to 464 00:14:50,880 --> 00:14:54,880 use this thing other than for a 465 00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:56,240 temporary solution amd's igp holds a 466 00:14:54,880 --> 00:14:58,240 significant 53 467 00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:00,079 advantage and obviously going with the 468 00:14:58,240 --> 00:15:00,800 dgpu kind of makes both of these 469 00:15:00,079 --> 00:15:03,440 irrelevant 470 00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:04,480 but that's a fantasy land at this point 471 00:15:03,440 --> 00:15:07,120 because they're hard to get 472 00:15:04,480 --> 00:15:08,880 the gt 1030 is actually struggling to 473 00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:10,399 fight with amd's apu here 474 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,600 and that's the part that's a little bit 475 00:15:10,399 --> 00:15:12,000 different from some of the other ones 476 00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:13,920 we've looked 477 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,839 at in the past transitioning briefly to 478 00:15:13,920 --> 00:15:16,480 cpu only production benchmarks will be 479 00:15:15,839 --> 00:15:18,399 our next 480 00:15:16,480 --> 00:15:21,360 set of charts in blender all core 481 00:15:18,399 --> 00:15:22,480 rendering the amd r55600g required 25 482 00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:25,680 minutes to complete 483 00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:28,880 which has it about on par with an amdr 484 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:31,519 six core 12 thread part the i5 11 600k 485 00:15:28,880 --> 00:15:34,399 outperformed the 5600g by a few minutes 486 00:15:31,519 --> 00:15:35,759 with the r5 3600x requiring 11 percent 487 00:15:34,399 --> 00:15:38,399 less time to render 488 00:15:35,759 --> 00:15:41,680 than the 5600g adobe premiere aggregate 489 00:15:38,399 --> 00:15:43,279 scoring has the r5 5600g at 695 points 490 00:15:41,680 --> 00:15:45,120 allowing the 5600x an 491 00:15:43,279 --> 00:15:47,040 overall performance lead of about 6.2 492 00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:48,240 percent and cpu bound tasks like 493 00:15:47,040 --> 00:15:49,839 rendering and scrubbing 494 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:52,240 keep in mind that this is tested with 495 00:15:49,839 --> 00:15:54,079 the same rtx 3080 in all configurations 496 00:15:52,240 --> 00:15:57,199 on the same ram so we're looking at 497 00:15:54,079 --> 00:16:00,000 cpu differences here the 5600g is more 498 00:15:57,199 --> 00:16:02,639 similar to the 3600 or the 3700x 499 00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:04,320 than to the modern 5600x in performance 500 00:16:02,639 --> 00:16:07,279 intel's 10 700k 501 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:08,639 leads at 740 points roughly tied with 502 00:16:07,279 --> 00:16:12,320 the 5600x 503 00:16:08,639 --> 00:16:15,360 with its 11 600k closer to the 5600g 504 00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:16,959 the 5600g is reasonably close to 5600x 505 00:16:15,360 --> 00:16:18,959 if you can't find one in stock 506 00:16:16,959 --> 00:16:21,120 but then the 3600 isn't much different 507 00:16:18,959 --> 00:16:23,199 either the cheaper of these two wins if 508 00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:26,320 you only need a cpu in chromium code 509 00:16:23,199 --> 00:16:27,360 compile the r55600g required 147 minutes 510 00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:30,399 an hour benchmark 511 00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:32,399 versus the 5600x is 131 minutes 512 00:16:30,399 --> 00:16:33,680 that's back to the 11 reduction time 513 00:16:32,399 --> 00:16:35,600 required that we saw in blender 514 00:16:33,680 --> 00:16:36,720 the 3600 takes about six and a half 515 00:16:35,600 --> 00:16:38,880 percent less time 516 00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:40,639 with the 11 600k leading more 517 00:16:38,880 --> 00:16:44,160 significantly at a 16 518 00:16:40,639 --> 00:16:46,320 reduction the 5600g leads the 11400 by 519 00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:47,920 a similar 16 reduction we have other 520 00:16:46,320 --> 00:16:49,600 production benchmarks complete but 521 00:16:47,920 --> 00:16:51,920 they're all about the same as these 522 00:16:49,600 --> 00:16:52,639 that includes photoshop 7-zip handbrake 523 00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:55,199 and others 524 00:16:52,639 --> 00:16:57,440 but the pattern persists moving back to 525 00:16:55,199 --> 00:16:58,000 games we'll look at how the 5600g does 526 00:16:57,440 --> 00:16:59,839 when 527 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:01,040 all of the cpus are tested and paired 528 00:16:59,839 --> 00:17:03,360 with the same hardware 529 00:17:01,040 --> 00:17:04,640 including the gpu so no igp's allowed 530 00:17:03,360 --> 00:17:06,640 the 5600g 531 00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:08,480 really isn't meant to be used this way 532 00:17:06,640 --> 00:17:10,640 but if you were to buy one now as maybe 533 00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:12,400 a stop gap and add a gpu later 534 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:14,480 this gives you a better idea for the 535 00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:17,280 maximum that the cpu 536 00:17:14,480 --> 00:17:18,559 will allow out of the gpu in rainbow six 537 00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:22,559 siege at 1080p 538 00:17:18,559 --> 00:17:25,520 the r55600g matched with the rtx 3080 539 00:17:22,559 --> 00:17:27,199 ends up at 393 fps average with lows 540 00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:27,919 slightly out of proportion versus the 541 00:17:27,199 --> 00:17:31,440 immediate 542 00:17:27,919 --> 00:17:32,480 r7 3700x and i5 11400 neighbors but 543 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:35,760 overall they're similar 544 00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:36,960 the r55600x leads the 5600g by 16 545 00:17:35,760 --> 00:17:40,080 percent in this one 546 00:17:36,960 --> 00:17:43,520 the i5 11 400 and 10 600k are both 547 00:17:40,080 --> 00:17:46,400 roughly six percent ahead the r5 3600 548 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:48,640 allows the 5600g a slight lead but 549 00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:50,559 if you can find a 3600 for significantly 550 00:17:48,640 --> 00:17:52,640 cheaper than a 5600g 551 00:17:50,559 --> 00:17:54,880 and you don't need its igp you'd get 552 00:17:52,640 --> 00:17:57,120 mostly the same performance the 3600 553 00:17:54,880 --> 00:17:59,200 being older and without an igp at all 554 00:17:57,120 --> 00:18:02,320 does have different disadvantages though 555 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:04,640 at 1440p the amd cpu slam into a wall of 556 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:05,360 about 340 fps average with the nvidia 557 00:18:04,640 --> 00:18:07,440 gpu 558 00:18:05,360 --> 00:18:10,160 where we see everything from the 5600x 559 00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:10,720 to the 5950x with an average fps error 560 00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:13,440 due to 561 00:18:10,720 --> 00:18:14,320 a bottleneck the r55600g is able to 562 00:18:13,440 --> 00:18:16,960 catch up here 563 00:18:14,320 --> 00:18:18,799 where the gpu bind reduces the 5600x's 564 00:18:16,960 --> 00:18:21,520 advantage to 5 565 00:18:18,799 --> 00:18:23,039 that's the nature of a gpu bind the cpu 566 00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:24,880 obviously doesn't matter as much 567 00:18:23,039 --> 00:18:27,039 cyberpunk is of course more relevant 568 00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:27,760 than ever thanks to tesla's use of it on 569 00:18:27,039 --> 00:18:29,520 stage 570 00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:32,000 although we don't have a test the model 571 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:35,280 s plaid listed in this benchmark charge 572 00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:37,520 we can at least show the 5600g the 5600g 573 00:18:35,280 --> 00:18:38,960 ran at 132fps average with those 574 00:18:37,520 --> 00:18:41,520 proportional to that 575 00:18:38,960 --> 00:18:42,799 that places it ahead of the 3700x by 576 00:18:41,520 --> 00:18:46,480 about seven and a half percent 577 00:18:42,799 --> 00:18:47,200 with the 11400 leading the 5600g by 6.7 578 00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:49,760 percent 579 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:51,200 and the 5600x leading the 5600 ge by 580 00:18:49,760 --> 00:18:52,960 16.5 581 00:18:51,200 --> 00:18:55,840 that's similar to what we saw in rainbow 582 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:58,720 six at 1080p in red that too the 5600g 583 00:18:55,840 --> 00:19:00,320 ran at 147 fps average with lows at 79 584 00:18:58,720 --> 00:19:02,480 and 68 fps 585 00:19:00,320 --> 00:19:03,520 that allows the 5600x a lead in all 586 00:19:02,480 --> 00:19:06,559 three metrics 587 00:19:03,520 --> 00:19:09,440 and about 11 on average that has the 588 00:19:06,559 --> 00:19:11,919 5600g outdone by the 11400 589 00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:13,919 but it's out doing the r5 3600 and the 590 00:19:11,919 --> 00:19:16,480 r7 3700x marginally 591 00:19:13,919 --> 00:19:18,880 f1 2020 runs a comically high frame rate 592 00:19:16,480 --> 00:19:22,400 when cpu bound much like in rainbow six 593 00:19:18,880 --> 00:19:24,720 and has the 5600g at 254 fps average 594 00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:26,080 with lows around 100 fps at the worst 595 00:19:24,720 --> 00:19:28,080 for the 0.1 percent 596 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:30,799 this is obviously completely playable in 597 00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:33,200 terms of a relative comparison the 5600x 598 00:19:30,799 --> 00:19:35,200 benefits from a lead of 26 599 00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:37,120 more noteworthy than some of these other 600 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:40,400 games while the 10600k 601 00:19:37,120 --> 00:19:42,320 ends up closer to parity with the 5600g 602 00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:44,160 the 11400 just for reference of 603 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,039 something kind of on the cheaper end for 604 00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:47,760 intel 605 00:19:45,039 --> 00:19:49,280 is also about equal to the 5600g right 606 00:19:47,760 --> 00:19:50,400 now although it's a little long on the 607 00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:52,720 tooth gta 5 608 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:54,799 is useful for understanding how cpus 609 00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:56,240 treat an older style build of game 610 00:19:54,799 --> 00:19:59,200 especially dx11 611 00:19:56,240 --> 00:19:59,679 with limited use beyond four threads gta 612 00:19:59,200 --> 00:20:02,880 5 613 00:19:59,679 --> 00:20:06,080 is definitely that game the r55600g 614 00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:09,120 ran at 115 fps average establishing 615 00:20:06,080 --> 00:20:12,159 a 17.8 percent advantage for the 5600 616 00:20:09,120 --> 00:20:15,200 x and about the same for the 11 600k 617 00:20:12,159 --> 00:20:17,200 the 115 fps average result is also near 618 00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:19,280 the intel i5 10 600k 619 00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:21,360 stock result power consumption is up now 620 00:20:19,280 --> 00:20:22,960 this is tested at the eps 12 volts 621 00:20:21,360 --> 00:20:25,039 cables so you're looking at the numbers 622 00:20:22,960 --> 00:20:27,039 before the vrm efficiency losses 623 00:20:25,039 --> 00:20:28,640 but after the wall that means we don't 624 00:20:27,039 --> 00:20:30,159 have any measurement of the gpu power 625 00:20:28,640 --> 00:20:32,080 consumption for this set of tests 626 00:20:30,159 --> 00:20:34,000 but we have a special set of power 627 00:20:32,080 --> 00:20:36,400 consumption tests we'll look at next 628 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:38,000 this is with the rtx 3080 running so 629 00:20:36,400 --> 00:20:39,720 it's entirely cpu bound 630 00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:42,640 in a blender cpu only workload the 631 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:44,159 r55600g pulled about 72 watts in the 632 00:20:42,640 --> 00:20:46,240 b550 pro board 633 00:20:44,159 --> 00:20:49,039 that's close to the 67 watts we observed 634 00:20:46,240 --> 00:20:50,960 in the x570 master since the motherboard 635 00:20:49,039 --> 00:20:52,080 had to change by necessity to support 636 00:20:50,960 --> 00:20:53,840 the apu 637 00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:55,840 we're not fully like for like between 638 00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:57,679 the 5600x and the jeep 639 00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:59,039 but we can call these functionally the 640 00:20:57,679 --> 00:21:02,240 same the 11400 641 00:20:59,039 --> 00:21:03,440 68 watts for comparison and the 3600 was 642 00:21:02,240 --> 00:21:05,679 closer to 80 watts 643 00:21:03,440 --> 00:21:07,679 remember that the igp again isn't doing 644 00:21:05,679 --> 00:21:09,280 much of anything here in cinebench r20 645 00:21:07,679 --> 00:21:10,799 tested within tau for intel 646 00:21:09,280 --> 00:21:13,840 so showing higher power consumption 647 00:21:10,799 --> 00:21:14,559 where applicable we see the 5600g at 77 648 00:21:13,840 --> 00:21:17,280 watts 649 00:21:14,559 --> 00:21:18,159 for the uh comparison of 66 with the 650 00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:20,720 5600 651 00:21:18,159 --> 00:21:22,799 x this was only a 5 watt or so increase 652 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:24,320 over blender for the 5600g 653 00:21:22,799 --> 00:21:26,000 and it was repeatable but it's also a 654 00:21:24,320 --> 00:21:27,520 different application and it's not that 655 00:21:26,000 --> 00:21:29,039 crazy of a difference so this all makes 656 00:21:27,520 --> 00:21:30,000 sense for single core rendering and 657 00:21:29,039 --> 00:21:32,640 cinebench r20 658 00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:35,919 the 5600g pulled about 16 watts while 659 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:37,679 the 5600 x was closer to 22 to 23 watts 660 00:21:35,919 --> 00:21:39,520 power consumption in a fully cpu 661 00:21:37,679 --> 00:21:42,159 constrained single core scenario was 662 00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:44,799 exceptionally low for the 5600g here we 663 00:21:42,159 --> 00:21:45,360 mixed in a new one-off test for the apus 664 00:21:44,799 --> 00:21:46,799 as well 665 00:21:45,360 --> 00:21:49,120 in this one we're measuring mixed 666 00:21:46,799 --> 00:21:50,799 workload power consumption with gaming 667 00:21:49,120 --> 00:21:52,720 this is rather than using the cpu 668 00:21:50,799 --> 00:21:53,600 targeted power draw with a d gpu 669 00:21:52,720 --> 00:21:56,559 previously 670 00:21:53,600 --> 00:21:58,480 the r55600g pulled between 32 and 40 671 00:21:56,559 --> 00:22:00,880 watts at the eps 12 volt cables 672 00:21:58,480 --> 00:22:02,720 that's when in a workload combining both 673 00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:05,120 cpu and gpu utilization 674 00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:06,880 on the same chip of course and in the 675 00:22:05,120 --> 00:22:08,080 more gpu bound conditions like rocket 676 00:22:06,880 --> 00:22:11,120 league or gta 677 00:22:08,080 --> 00:22:12,960 at 1440 we saw lower or slightly lower 678 00:22:11,120 --> 00:22:14,000 power consumption than in the more cpu 679 00:22:12,960 --> 00:22:16,320 bound conditions 680 00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:17,520 because none of these are 100 workloads 681 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:20,000 on the cpu 682 00:22:17,520 --> 00:22:21,840 given that the igp is doing work here we 683 00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:23,520 don't see power consumption as high as 684 00:22:21,840 --> 00:22:25,520 the previous cpu only charts 685 00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:26,880 the gpu appears to be the more limiting 686 00:22:25,520 --> 00:22:29,039 of the two components 687 00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:29,919 and again something has to limit you 688 00:22:29,039 --> 00:22:31,919 eventually 689 00:22:29,919 --> 00:22:32,960 it just happens to be the igp in this 690 00:22:31,919 --> 00:22:34,640 coupling of the two 691 00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:36,640 just as some final validation we'll look 692 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:36,960 at the igp frequency to check whether 693 00:22:36,640 --> 00:22:38,880 the 694 00:22:36,960 --> 00:22:40,480 software reads it accurately and whether 695 00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:43,919 everything is working as it should 696 00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:45,360 and this 5600g spec list the gpu clock 697 00:22:43,919 --> 00:22:46,880 at 1900 megahertz 698 00:22:45,360 --> 00:22:48,880 and looking at our testing during some 699 00:22:46,880 --> 00:22:50,320 rocket league gameplay we landed at 700 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:51,679 exactly 1900. 701 00:22:50,320 --> 00:22:53,280 it didn't deviate at all at least 702 00:22:51,679 --> 00:22:55,520 according to the software and it stayed 703 00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:57,600 at flat 1900 whenever under load so 704 00:22:55,520 --> 00:22:59,520 that's it for the rfi 5600g ap 705 00:22:57,600 --> 00:23:01,280 review if you're looking at buying this 706 00:22:59,520 --> 00:23:03,280 thing either in the future 707 00:23:01,280 --> 00:23:05,360 first of all check back but either in 708 00:23:03,280 --> 00:23:07,440 the future is a standalone solution or 709 00:23:05,360 --> 00:23:08,240 an oem pre-built right now again you can 710 00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:09,919 find them on 711 00:23:08,240 --> 00:23:11,919 hp for example pretty easily at least we 712 00:23:09,919 --> 00:23:16,480 were able to then 713 00:23:11,919 --> 00:23:16,799 the 5600g is a relatively capable cpu 714 00:23:16,480 --> 00:23:19,440 but 715 00:23:16,799 --> 00:23:21,679 it's not quite as powerful as the 5600x 716 00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:23,039 and a lot of the cpu only tasks like in 717 00:23:21,679 --> 00:23:25,440 things such as blender 718 00:23:23,039 --> 00:23:26,080 premiere where we're testing for cpu 719 00:23:25,440 --> 00:23:28,080 performance 720 00:23:26,080 --> 00:23:30,720 and ignoring the presence of the apu the 721 00:23:28,080 --> 00:23:32,799 igp in those tasks 722 00:23:30,720 --> 00:23:35,280 we end up with a cpu that's roughly in 723 00:23:32,799 --> 00:23:37,200 the range of say an r5 3600 724 00:23:35,280 --> 00:23:38,320 sometimes the 10 600k depending on what 725 00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:40,559 application you're looking at 726 00:23:38,320 --> 00:23:42,320 so it is definitely not a drop in 727 00:23:40,559 --> 00:23:43,840 replacement for a 5600x 728 00:23:42,320 --> 00:23:45,360 runs a little bit slower maybe that'll 729 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:47,840 change in the future but 730 00:23:45,360 --> 00:23:49,200 as it exists now that's where it lands 731 00:23:47,840 --> 00:23:50,159 and the cpu 732 00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:52,240 isn't really a thing that's going to 733 00:23:50,159 --> 00:23:53,679 change with drivers zen 3's 734 00:23:52,240 --> 00:23:56,240 fairly mature at this point so it's the 735 00:23:53,679 --> 00:23:58,159 bios and the frequencies are running at 736 00:23:56,240 --> 00:24:00,240 amd spec so we really don't suspect the 737 00:23:58,159 --> 00:24:02,159 cpu performance will move much at all 738 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:04,080 and so you'll end up where if you just 739 00:24:02,159 --> 00:24:06,400 want a cpu and you want a six core 12 740 00:24:04,080 --> 00:24:07,600 thread one and you can find a 5600x 741 00:24:06,400 --> 00:24:10,000 you should just probably just buy that 742 00:24:07,600 --> 00:24:11,600 instead but if you need the 743 00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:13,360 igp component that's where it gets more 744 00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:15,440 interesting so as 745 00:24:13,360 --> 00:24:17,039 a combined unit you end up with 746 00:24:15,440 --> 00:24:19,600 performance roughly 747 00:24:17,039 --> 00:24:21,760 in the range in some games of a 10 100 748 00:24:19,600 --> 00:24:25,039 plus a gt 1030 gddr5 749 00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:26,640 not ddr4 version uh or sometimes behind 750 00:24:25,039 --> 00:24:29,520 it and it does depend on the game 751 00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:30,400 the gpu as we found in the testing today 752 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:33,120 the 753 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:34,240 cus in here from vega are definitely the 754 00:24:33,120 --> 00:24:38,240 weakest point of it 755 00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:40,559 the cpu does well and it's the igp that 756 00:24:38,240 --> 00:24:42,159 ends up bottlenecking if you bottleneck 757 00:24:40,559 --> 00:24:44,799 in gaming there are some breakouts from 758 00:24:42,159 --> 00:24:45,600 that and extremely cpu bound games for 759 00:24:44,799 --> 00:24:48,240 the most part 760 00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:49,520 it's an igp limitation so then the apus 761 00:24:48,240 --> 00:24:52,000 end up being something that 762 00:24:49,520 --> 00:24:54,000 you can actually use these days to play 763 00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:55,919 games at reasonable settings 764 00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:57,120 it's once you start getting into higher 765 00:24:55,919 --> 00:25:00,159 end stuff 766 00:24:57,120 --> 00:25:01,200 we call it aaa typically where they'll 767 00:25:00,159 --> 00:25:02,400 start to struggle 768 00:25:01,200 --> 00:25:05,440 and you're going to have a hard time 769 00:25:02,400 --> 00:25:07,520 running graphic settings that are 770 00:25:05,440 --> 00:25:08,799 good looking in games like say red dead 771 00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:11,200 2 or 772 00:25:08,799 --> 00:25:12,559 cyberpunk 2077 i'll be everything 773 00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:13,760 struggles with that game 774 00:25:12,559 --> 00:25:15,919 but you'll have a little more trouble 775 00:25:13,760 --> 00:25:17,360 running the the higher quality games 776 00:25:15,919 --> 00:25:19,919 with higher quality graphics 777 00:25:17,360 --> 00:25:21,600 and that's the nature of something that 778 00:25:19,919 --> 00:25:24,559 is both a cpu and a gpu 779 00:25:21,600 --> 00:25:25,440 in this package size can't expect the 780 00:25:24,559 --> 00:25:27,360 world from it 781 00:25:25,440 --> 00:25:28,799 but these are far better than they used 782 00:25:27,360 --> 00:25:30,799 to be and it's something you could 783 00:25:28,799 --> 00:25:32,159 actually use to play games now 784 00:25:30,799 --> 00:25:33,679 whether or not it makes sense it's going 785 00:25:32,159 --> 00:25:35,200 to depend on the price we buy it with an 786 00:25:33,679 --> 00:25:36,799 oem system well that's 787 00:25:35,200 --> 00:25:38,960 we can't really judge that because those 788 00:25:36,799 --> 00:25:39,600 parts are all completely variable and 789 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:41,039 there's 790 00:25:39,600 --> 00:25:43,360 at least seven eight other components in 791 00:25:41,039 --> 00:25:44,400 there so you'll need to evaluate that 792 00:25:43,360 --> 00:25:46,320 system by system 793 00:25:44,400 --> 00:25:48,400 as a standalone part it's not worth the 794 00:25:46,320 --> 00:25:50,240 scalper prices do not pay that money for 795 00:25:48,400 --> 00:25:52,320 it you'd be better off getting 796 00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:54,080 an intel or an amd cpu standalone or an 797 00:25:52,320 --> 00:25:55,760 intel one if you need the igp as 798 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:57,520 a stop gap but the igp is much worse 799 00:25:55,760 --> 00:25:59,279 than this or 800 00:25:57,520 --> 00:26:01,200 you'd be better off waiting for this to 801 00:25:59,279 --> 00:26:02,960 launch the diy or buying the pre-built 802 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,919 that's another option too so that's it 803 00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:04,320 for this one thanks for watching as 804 00:26:03,919 --> 00:26:05,919 always 805 00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:07,200 subscribe for more check back for 806 00:26:05,919 --> 00:26:09,120 follow-ups on this there's a lot of 807 00:26:07,200 --> 00:26:11,600 interesting stuff we can do with apus 808 00:26:09,120 --> 00:26:13,279 we don't have a really firm conclusion 809 00:26:11,600 --> 00:26:14,080 on this as a diy part right now just 810 00:26:13,279 --> 00:26:16,000 because you 811 00:26:14,080 --> 00:26:17,360 can't officially buy it that way so 812 00:26:16,000 --> 00:26:20,559 we'll reevaluate 813 00:26:17,360 --> 00:26:22,360 as amd perhaps for the diy launch but as 814 00:26:20,559 --> 00:26:23,919 always check back for more you can go to 815 00:26:22,360 --> 00:26:24,480 store.gamersnexus.net if you'd like to 816 00:26:23,919 --> 00:26:26,880 grab 817 00:26:24,480 --> 00:26:28,080 some of our shirts like these pc 818 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:31,120 shortage t-shirts 819 00:26:28,080 --> 00:26:33,200 or you can go to patreon.comgamersnexus 820 00:26:31,120 --> 00:26:36,640 to get behind the scenes videos thanks 821 00:26:33,200 --> 00:26:36,640 for watching we'll see you all next time 57816

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.