Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
♪ Somber music ♪
This is Christopher Rothko.
I'm Mark Rothko's son.
And I have been told by many people
who've known both of us
that we had similar voices.
♪
Born Dvinsk, Latvia 1903.
Migrated to Portland, Oregon 1913.
♪ Somber music ♪
"You don't know what it is
to be a Jewish kid dressed in a suit
from Dvinsk,
not an American suit,
traveling across America and not able
"to speak English."
♪
"I was never able to forgive this transplantation
to a land where I never felt
entirely at home."
♪ somber music ♪
(clackety-clack of train)
Like, she... she, like, realizes...
(vehicles passing)
Do you know this building?
I know it's a landmark.
(chuckles)
Do you know that Mark Rothko
was living here?
No, I didn't.
Do you know his name?
No.
I just know the people
who live in there.
They are kind of your friends or...
Yeah, they look out for me.
You know, they always look out for me.
(horn honks)
"When I was a younger man,
art was a lonely thing.
No galleries, no collectors,
no critics...
no money.
Yet, it was a golden time,
for then, we had nothing to lose,
and a vision to gain.
Today, it is not quite the same.
It is a time of tons of verbiage,
activity and consumption.
Which condition is better for
the world at large?
I will not venture to discuss.
But I do know
that many who are driven to this life
are desperately searching for those pockets of silence
"where they can root and grow."
♪
Everything about Rothko is about...
changes, about voyages,
about travels.
You know, first of all,
the geographical travels.
He was born in Russia in 1907
in the Russian Empire,
in a city called Dvinsk,
now Daugavpils now in Latvia.
And at the age of 10,
his family moved to the United States.
Then he moved all over the United States,
and he came back many times to Europe.
So, basically, all those geographical
travels...
I mean, made him what he was.
♪ Somber music ♪
"I became a painter because I wanted
to raise painting to the level
of poignancy of music and poetry."
"The struggle is beyond painting,
not with painting."
♪ piano music ♪
(inaudible chatter)
(train screeching)
This is 77th Street.
♪ Drone music ♪
"Myths are the symbols of man's primitive fears
and motivations,
no matter in which land or what time,
changing only in detail
"never in substance."
♪ drone music ♪
"I sense a deep affinity.
The same feeling,
the same broad expanses of somber color."
♪
So, there is, in himself,
you know, a tension,
a tension between, uh, the new world
in which he lives,
the abstraction,
the abstract art that he's going
to be part of...
but also these original myths
from Europe that he originates from.
And when he goes back to the Greeks
and the Greek myths,
and he starts painting again
mythological.
So, that's a way of grounding
his own art in the...
in the b... in the basics
of European culture
and European history.
Uh, from then on, he's going to be able
to evolve and find his own language.
♪ Drone music ♪
He's such an articulate
intellectual,
such an articulate scholar that, uh,
it's not this, you know,
there's no wonder that today
Rothko is talking to us
much better than anybody else.
(hammering)
(inaudible chatter)
I don't know if it's this one.
I have to check the room number: 43264.
43264.
(drilling)
I've arranged the exhibition in two ways.
The reason is that during the preparations I often came across people saying:
"Rothko? That's emotion."
That is not my usual approach.
My initial approach is always that I want to understand something.
And that does not exclude emotion. On the contrary.
I think that art is where those two connect.
Most people think the two are incompatible and cannot be brought together.
But precisely in art they come together. I've tried to show that in the exhibition.
By saying bluntly: If you walk straight on, you will understand something.
If you prefer an emotional experience, turn left.
♪ somber music ♪
"Art is an adventure
into an unknown world,
which can be explored only by those willing
to take the risks."
"I'm not an abstractionist,
I'm not interested in the relationship
of color or form or anything else.
I'm interested only in expressing
basic human emotions;
tragedy, ecstasy,
doom, and so on.
And the fact that lots of people
break down and cry when confronted
with my pictures shows that I can
communicate those basic human emotions.
The people who weep before my pictures
are having the same religious experience I had
when I painted them.
And if you are moved only by their color,
"then you miss the point."
♪ somber music ♪
♪
"I quarrel with surrealist and abstract art
only as one quarrels with his father and mother,
recognizing the inevitability
and functions of my roots,
but insistent upon my dissensions.
I am both them and a new integral
"completely independent of them."
♪
These three paintings here...
...off the top of my head 1946, 1948, 1949...
...you see an enormously chaotic colour mixture...
...you can't recognize:
It's not abstract, it's not expressionist or geometric...
What is it? Clouds? Indeterminate.
But it crystallizes in this direction.
Until there you arrive at something...
...that is a reduction of the imagery to make it more clear.
He wants direct communication.
That's too complex for communication. This is clear.
♪ drone music ♪
"I'm not a mystic.
A prophet, perhaps.
But I don't prophesy woes to come.
I just paint the woes already here."
The height is wonderful, isn't it?
He must've loved that.
Hmm.
We are wondering if this is Mark Rothko's paint?
I don't know, it's hard to say, isn't it?
I mean, you can't say definitively.
I'm sure there have been other painters in here.
This certainly has a feel of it,
but it seems like a lot of it right there.
It doesn't seem...
I think there's no reason to think
there isn't some of Rothko's paint,
but one can't say with any...
Any surety.
I don't even know what it tells us that much, really.
I mean, we know he had the paintings on pulleys,
we know they were on the... stretched,
we know that they were on the wall.
Um...
There's a lot of white.
I don't think that...
(laughs)
-Too much white. -Yeah.
I don't know, a floor is a history.
I mean, it's...
it tells so much about what's happened
in this space as opposed
to who necessarily was in the space.
It was more about the space, I think,
than the painter.
In that regard, it's kind of wonderful.
Yeah, hm.
♪ Drone music ♪
(cars passing)
What is the sadness of life, sir?
Excuse me?
What is the sadness of life?
Not having a mother.
You know?
Mom left me when I was two,
my father left me when I was 12, you know?
That's what hurts, you know?
When I see family, you know,
sometimes I cry because...
I wish that was me, you know?
It hurts real bad.
You know?
But that's life, you know?
In America you have accidental babies,
you have trick babies, sex offender babies,
abused babies, adopted babies,
mommy's babies, and daddy's maybes.
You know?
I don't know what ground I'm on.
You know?
♪ Drone music ♪
What does this one cost? - I don't know by heart.
This is from a period...
...a transitional period to his classical period. The last step.
1949.
And they are usually in the order of...
...eight or nine million.
But there is one with yet another zero.
(laughs)
Which one? - It's not yet unpacked.
If you look at the back...
...how...
...the canvas was stapled on...
...it's all very fragile.
It shows that he was not a professional painter.
He was a philosopher...
...who used canvas and colour to express philosophical thought.
What are you looking at?
A first impression. Is there anything odd?
I don't know the painting but I can see there's no big scratch on it.
But the courier is coming to take a more specific look.
And then we both sign for approval.
♪ somber music ♪
"The recipe for a work of art,
its ingredients, how to make it,
the formula.
Number one:
there must be a clear
preoccupation with death.
Number two:
sensuality.
It is a lustful relationship
to things that exist.
Number three:
tension,
either conflict or curbed desire.
Number four:
irony.
This is a modern ingredient.
Number five:
wit and play
for the human element.
Number six:
the ephemeral and chance,
also for the human element.
And number seven:
hope.
Ten percent.
Just enough to make the tragic concept
"more endurable."
I think this is, uh, an example of my father's
great love of irony.
I think if we take him too seriously,
we are in trouble.
(cityscape sounds)
Painting, for him, was a way
to address the people.
It was a social statement.
It was a way of finding
his identity
in the American society.
It was a way of stating that the artist
has a role in society.
It was not the case in the United States.
The United States was a country
where the artist was very much marginalized.
So, Rothko decided to step in
and to...
to assert what he had to say is true:
his art.
♪ Drone music ♪
"After I had been at work for some time,
I realized that I was much influenced subconsciously
by Michelangelo's walls in the staircase
of the Medici Library in Florence.
He achieved just the kind of feeling I'm after.
He makes the viewers feel
that they are trapped in a room
where all the doors and windows are bricked up,
so that all they can do
"is butt their heads forever to the wall."
♪ drone music ♪
(pebbles clanking)
(pebbles rolling)
You could say that Rothko is after a one-to-one confrontation.
He more or less excluded the space around it.
It was all about the physical dialogue with the canvas.
But well, a body is always in space and you can't entirely ignore it.
When he was commissioned to do a series of paintings for a Manhattan restaurant...
...a luxury restaurant...
...he was confronted with a novel situation.
On the one hand he found it very fascinating...
...to be allowed to use the whole room, to involve the whole space...
...but he doubted whether a luxury restaurant was the right space.
It kept nagging at him and he didn't solve the dilemma.
He needed a break and went with his wife and daughter to Italy...
...where he visited many places that featured 'art on location'.
Also purpose-built locations.
Especially the monastery cells in the St Mark in Florence.
He went there...
...and the situation there is as follows.
In a small cell for a monk...
...there's a fresco by Fra Angelico on the short wall, made for the monk.
He can develop a relationship with it.
♪ drone music ♪
It's the perfect participation that Rothko envisaged for his paintings.
And when he came back...
...he was pained by the difference with the luxury restaurant.
I think that's why he returned the commission.
It's the famous failed Seagram commission.
But it was the first step in a whole development...
...of making works for specific locations.
♪ drone music ♪
"Since my pictures are large,
colorful and unframed,
and since museum walls are usually immense
and formidable,
there is the danger that the pictures
relate themselves as decorative areas
to the wall.
This would be a distortion of their meaning.
Since the pictures are intimate and intense,
and have been painted in a scale of normal living
"rather than an institutional scale."
♪
The Association of Friends of Harvard University got a new building.
He made five paintings for it.
He wanted to show that it was possible:
To create a space with paintings, to create a sanctified location...
...without the paintings being degraded to decorations.
So he worked on those, and created paintings for this specific space.
There was also a reception room.
But in that case the problem was...
...that the canvases were enormous...
...wall-covering and therefore called 'murals'.
The other walls had gigantic windows.
The pigment he had used was highly light-sensitive...
...and the sun was shining all day.
And some years after his death the paintings had to be removed,
In that sense it also failed. The installation doesn't exist anymore.
♪ violin music ♪
"When I went to Europe and saw the old masters,
I was involved with the credibility of the drama.
Would Christ on the cross, if he opened his eyes,
believe the spectators?"
♪
"I think that small pictures,
since the Renaissance,
are like novels.
Large pictures are like dramas
in which one participates
"in a direct way."
♪
Painting is, in fact, the subject.
Here, he... he's almost a sculpture.
Mm-hmm, yeah.
And what Rembrandt did, and especially
this whole part, but... but this...
This is blurred.
This is abstract painting.
And also this.
I mean, this... this color red,
it's (inaudible word).
It's... it's, I mean, of course,
paint... yeah, the face is very nice,
but he did many paintings.
But this... this has never been done.
So, basically, it's not so much
the faces, which he's interested in,
but the figures and the experimentation of light.
Here we look at invention in art.
And then Rothko comes close.
Rothko wrote in 1940 that Rembrandt
was interested in the plasticity of light.
-Here. -Yeah.
And Rothko reinvented himself in 1940
when he wrote a book called The Artist's Reality
where he's looking at all the figures.
He stops painting for one whole year
and he write a book.
And in this book he goes through
all the big figures of the past;
philosophers, writers,
musicians, and artists.
And he talks about Rembrandt a lot,
especially about this painting
and the plasticity of light.
(echoed chatter)
"Rembrandt discovered that his patrons
were not interested in his plastic
preoccupations with light,
and that they preferred the obvious illustrative gifts
"of his contemporaries and followers."
"Rembrandt and Rothko."
Rothko would say to a friend,
then pause, smile, and say,
"Rothko and Rembrandt."
I'm gonna add...
I'm gonna add one from the family.
This is not written anywhere,
but this... this is what he said in the house.
"Mozart, Matisse, and Mark."
That's the follow-up to "Rothko and Rembrandt."
No, he didn't turn it around as far as I know.
I don't think anyone could go before Mozart.
(pebbles clanking)
"When you looked at Matisse's Red Studio,
you became that color.
You became totally saturated with it."
♪ drone music ♪
(cityscape sounds)
"Art necessarily reflects the artist's
understanding of his times.
We have wiped the slate clean.
We started new.
A new land.
We have got to forget
"what the old master's did."
(emergency sirens in distance)
His third installation was a commission by a married couple of collectors in Houston.
The De Menil couple.
People had long agreed that Rothko's work would look best in a chapel.
They asked him to paint for a chapel specifically built for this purpose.
He was totally in control there.
That is the famous Rothko chapel in Houston.
He had rented a studio that was large enough...
...to make a mock-up of the chapel and paint in the circumstances the work was meant for.
♪ somber music ♪
"I've wanted to paint my own size.
I wanted to recognize myself in my work.
Then I realized it's completed."
His project was not painting paintings,
his project was to create environments.
His project was to reinvent
a relationship between the public
and his art.
And how would it be?
It would be like theater.
He wanted the viewer to step into the painting.
He wanted the paintings to be...
Not positioned low, but... high, but low.
He wanted them not to be on a white wall,
but on an off-white wall.
He wanted them not to be lighted,
but very in the shadow.
And he didn't want one painting,
but a whole room.
He wanted the audience to be surrounded by the art.
Why?
Because what he aimed at
was not consumption of art,
he wanted a dialogue, an interaction,
a spiritual dimension,
something much more complex
than, you know, than watching a painting.
He wanted, uh,
basically, he thought that art could
transform, um, the public.
♪ Drone music ♪
♪ piano music ♪
"If I must place my trust somewhere,
I would invest it in the psyche
of sensitive observers
who are free of the conventions
of understanding.
I would have no apprehensions
about the use they would make of these pictures
for the needs of their own spirits,
for if there is both need and spirit,
"there is bound to be a real transaction."
How is it to restore a Rothko?
Well...
it's complicated.
I think to restore any work of art
is complicated.
Um, for a non, uh, representational work of art,
an abstract work of art,
it's even more difficult because we don't have
any representational clues to go by.
So, we are very much in need of understanding
the artist's manipulation of material
for visual effect.
And that takes time,
that's not something that you immediately see
when you look at a work of art.
So, in the case of Rothko,
because it's so sophisticated,
it's so many layers,
it's so much building up of paint over time,
um, it takes that amount of time as well
to understand what the artist
is trying to achieve.
♪ Somber music ♪
Do you think that the paintings
we see in Houston,
that we see them now with the light
Rothko wishes?
Um, I think that's a hard question to answer.
I would say that the question of the light
is the overriding question that haunts
those of us concerned with the Rothko Chapel.
It never seemed to be right.
And so, um, it's something
that will always be on our minds
of how to improve it, resolve it, make...
Make peace with it in someway.
Um, I don't... so I can't say
that you're seeing the paintings
exactly the way Rothko would've intended,
but what I can say is that you will have
a very, um, personal and meditative,
I think, experience in the chapel
from the light.
Um, the light changes in Houston.
Well, everywhere it changes,
but because it's all natural light,
if you sit there you'll see clouds go by,
you'll feel the change of light,
and the paintings respond in that way.
♪ Somber music ♪
"I would like to say to those
who think of my pictures as serene
that I have imprisoned the most utter violence
in every inch of their surface."
♪ somber music ♪
Bryan Robertson describes a moment
in the Whitechapel Gallery with Rothko,
together with Rothko when he left the place.
He said, "My strongest personal memory"
is of leaving the Whitechapel Gallery
with Rothko late one winter afternoon
when the daylight had practically gone.
He asked me to switch all the lights off
everywhere.
And suddenly Rothko's color
made its own light.
The effect once the retina had adjusted itself
was unforgettable.
Smoldering, and blazing,
and glowing softly from the walls.
Color in the darkness.
We stood there a long time
and I wished everyone could have seen the world
Rothko had made in those perfect conditions,
radiating its own energy
and uncorrected by artifice
"or the marketplace."
I think it's wonderful.
♪ Drone music ♪
It was a custom to equate the blackness
and the sharpness of the Rothko Chapel paintings
with the artist's despair.
I never felt that.
I never did, and I still don't.
I truly believe that the paintings...
Well, there are two things.
But I truly believe that the paintings
were a... a major step forward for him, technically.
In eliminating color, the one feature
for which he was best known,
and he had... his classic paintings
he was a master of,
he kind of upped the bar
and went into creating paintings
without a lot of color.
He also was so well-known, as you know,
in his classic work for these wonderful
diaphanous edges around his forms.
In the Chapel paintings he does these very tight,
straight, taped even,
forms, edges.
He's just going into something very different,
and I think that's a very hard,
hard thing to do.
I think it was a natural progression
of where he was going,
but I do not think...
And I wish it would be dispelled forever...
This association with that
with his final death.
I do not think that that...
That makes sense at all.
♪ Drone music ♪
"There is more power in telling little
than in telling all.
Silence is so accurate."
♪
The color of my voice?
What color?
Um, I don't know,
I think dark brown.
His voice was a little softer, I think.
A little, a little rounder
around the edges.
He has a little bit more red in it.
♪
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.