Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
[Waves crashing]
Man, voice-over: A few summers ago, I was at the beach with my family.
And right when we got there, we took off our shoes
and ran to the ocean's edge.
And we've all experienced this before.
The waves kind of come in.
And as they wash out, we feel ourselves sinking
because the sand beneath us is getting wet.
But at the same time,
if we're looking out to the horizon line,
it doesn't seem like much changes.
It's very discombobulating.
Marine biologists call this area
that is sometimes above water and sometimes below water
the intertidal zone.
In many ways, that's where we are right now as a society.
We're in an intertidal moment.
You feel like everything's in some ways the same.
You still wake up. You're still you.
But there's a shift,
and you can't quite put your finger on it.
It's really a crossroads moment for humanity.
Imagine, if you will, sitting down to your morning coffee,
turning on your home computer to read the day's newspaper.
Well, it's not as far-fetched as it may seem.
Woman 2: Well, I think what we're seeing
is a new digital wild west where no one is in charge.
Thank you for the likes! Let's get to 40,000.
[All clamoring]
Man: This is freaking crazy.
Woman: More than 3 billion people
in almost 70 countries and territories
have been asked to stay at home.
Joe Biden: The question is-- Donald Trump: The radical left--
Biden: Will you shut up, man? Trump: Listen.
[All clamoring]
Woman: Abnormal behaviors mean more panic,
aggression, confusion, or anxiety during waking hours.
♪
Man: I don't believe we've even
se \h en the tip of the iceberg.
I think we're really on the verge
of something wonderful and terrifying.
[Thunder]
[Emergency alert system beeping]
Man: I can hear you. I think it's a filter.
Man 2: Yes. I'm here live.
I'm not a cat.
[Rumbling]
Man: How come you're smoking weed in the Capitol?
Man 2: Because I can.
♪
Woman: Do you feel like too much is changing too fast?
[Grimes' "Oblivion" playing]
♪ Ooh ♪
♪ Ooh ♪
♪ I never walk about after dark ♪
♪ It's my point of view ♪
♪ Someone could break your neck ♪
♪ Coming up behind you ♪
♪ Always coming and you never have a clue ♪
♪ I never look behind all the time ♪
♪ I will wait forever ♪
♪ Always looking straight ♪
♪ Thinking, counting all the hours you wait ♪
[Car horns honking]
Man: I use the term the intertidal moment
to kind of describe where we are
in the current kind of arc of human history.
What sets this apart from almost any other
intertidal that has come before,
this is probably the first time that we can
actually recognize that we're actually in an intertidal.
So, instead of it just kind of happening
and everyone feeling discombobulated,
we all feel something is not working.
And at the same time,
we're grappling and looking for something else.
Hello there.
I'm curious about how we can find and embrace
the creative potential of this moment.
But first, we have to get a bearing
on what moment we're actually in.
That's led me here to Columbia University,
where I sat down with a group of graduate students
training to become the future leaders of tomorrow.
So, it's 2040, and you're being asked to kind of
describe this moment in human history,
in the big scope.
Talk to each other.
Talk to me about how you're going to describe
what it is that we're going through right now.
Coming out of the pandemic, and there's a lot of confusion
around, well, if we're coming out of this,
what are we going into?
The world that we knew before is just much different.
What is, you know, that next step?
What's the life that we're moving towards?
Nobody really knows.
Like, from individuals to business leaders
to government leaders, we're all here
just really trying to figure it out.
And that sense of leadership
as this is who I want to follow to get there
is probably more unclear now than it maybe has ever been.
I think this is an interesting moment
of, like, excitement and opportunity,
but it's all founded in a level of uncertainty
that I have not been in before.
There were a lot of things that I think
we took for granted, a lot of certainties
that we had taken for granted
that I think have all bubbled up to the top right now
in terms of, you know, where is there security?
What does it look like for something
to function correctly for everyone?
What is it that we are taking for granted?
Just revenue building can't be the bottom line,
that individualistic mindset can't be it anymore.
So, in 2040, if I looked back and I explained to my kids
hopefully what this time looked like,
I think it was a time of opportunity
with responsibility.
I feel like also climate-wise, this is--
I mean, these years are really
going to be, like, deciding about our future, right?
So, by 2040, hopefully, we'll be looking back
and say we made some very wise decisions in that regard,
and we won't have to tell our kids,
well, sorry, we, like, did it wrong.
I really do hope that.
And I think with regards to that,
there are a lot of sort of turning points
that we are able to shape right now,
which gives us a responsibility you mentioned
and which means that you have to think about
how you want to shape the future.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: When things are stable, it feels safe.
But that's the opposite
of what the world feels like right now.
From our lives to our own jobs to our families
to our country to the climate to the politics,
it feels unsteady, it feels in flux.
When that happens, your brain, your amygdala,
is going to say, "This is not safe."
I don't feel like we're in a stable place.
Man: You look at any long form of humanity
over thousands and thousands or hundreds of thousands of years,
if you go way back to the beginning,
and it's flat.
It's flat in terms of population.
It's flat in terms of technology.
It's flat in terms of communication.
It's flat.
And then for the last eye blink, it explodes.
♪
You've never had a period on a planet like the last 50 years,
really half a century of
un \h precedented human progress.
Education levels increased. Infant mortality reduced.
Life expectancy grew extraordinarily
all over the world.
Now, there were costs to that globalization.
We are now at the beginning
of a new globalization in ways that even a year ago,
never mind 20, seemed inconceivable,
and, of course, I'm talking about the AI revolution.
We're living through a moment of extraordinary change.
Even good change can be hard.
The information environment that we're living in,
it is completely surrounding us.
It's coming at us 24/7.
And unfortunately a lot of times,
this information that comes at us is negative.
It stokes fear and anxiety.
But for young people in particular,
there is more and more data that we have that is telling us
that many young people are in fact harmed.
There are 3 numbers that really stick out to me.
If you look at a high school with 1,000 kids in it,
about 450 of those children
are feeling persistently sad or hopeless.
200 of those children
have considered taking their own life.
And 100 of those kids have attempted suicide.
As much as we're struggling right now,
as much as our kids are in a mental health crisis,
it does not have to be this way.
There's a choice we have
between a world where people are increasingly in despair
and a world where people are connected to one another,
where we look at the future and see possibility.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: Life has always been full of change.
But the growing sense that we
ar \h e entering uncharted waters
is being felt around the world
in unprecedented ways right now.
We're living in a time between times
when what was is no longer working
and what will be has yet to be born.
But what happens in a moment when the usual shifts
we experience all the time in one industry or culture
become heightened and intertwined?
What does it take to navigate through a period
when the degree of complexity and confusion in our lives
feels like it's turned up to 11?
And what kind of stress is this all putting on our brain's ability
to make sense
of \h what we're living through?
Man: So, Ari, we're going to do a neurofunctional assessment.
This is called a TheraQ.
It's picking up brainwave activity.
There we go. Beautiful.
Voice: This will only take a few minutes.
Your assessment is starting now.
Close your eyes.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: Dr. Brown has spent his life
following the effects the modern world is having on us
through traditional psychology
as well as neurofeedback systems
that are getting increasingly powerful
at monitoring our brains' response
to the pressures of this moment we find ourselves in.
One of the things that I'm curious about
is how you see this current moment.
And by that, I mean this current moment
for humanity writ large.
Broadly, I think we're in a time
that has moved more and more towards
kind of the atomization of individuals.
There are stressors that are putting demands on our bodies
and on our brains that are in turn
affecting the way we live our lives
and the way we live together.
♪
One way of thinking about this is that
our bodies and our brains
have a blueprint that was laid down
for what was useful to survive 100,000 years ago.
And back then, what you're trying to do
was not be eaten by a bear or a saber-toothed tiger,
depending on how far back you go.
♪
So, everything in our evolution
was shaping us towards developing
an effective fight or flight system,
dealing with physical threat, immediate threat.
And that's not very well suited to our life now.
Instead, we have stressors and demands
that are longer term, that are chronic,
and our bodies aren't really designed for that.
Our brains aren't really designed for that.
So, what happens when you take someone who's wired
for fight or flight, you know,
hundreds of thousands of years of evolution,
but you stick them in a cubicle,
or you stick them, you know, on a factory floor,
doing the same thing over and over again,
or you put them in a classroom for 8 hours a day,
sitting at a desk?
I think we perceive a lot of threat right now in our world.
And it's not often the kind of threat
that we're designed to deal with.
We're designed to deal with concrete,
time-limited threat.
What we have is diffuse,
something bad's going to happen,
I don't know what, kind of threat.
And it's not time-limited. It's ongoing.
Wallach, voice-over: A lot of us feel that right now,
this kind of low-grade sense of fear and uncertainty
about where we're headed.
And it can leave us feeling powerless
over what comes next.
[Wind howling]
But what do we do when some of these threats
are not imagined, but rather painfully real?
One of those is a threat to the natural world around us.
The systems that sustain all life on this planet
are warning us that things are not OK.
And yet if you're like me,
it \h 's so easy to feel helpless
in the face of a challenge this big.
That led me here to the northeast coast of Canada,
where Valérie Courtois leads a growing group of people
who refuse to ignore this threat right here,
in one of the most ecologically important
places on Earth.
Tell me about this land. Where are we right now?
We're in Nitassinan, which is the Innu word for our land
or the place of the Innu,
specifically known as Labrador today.
We're at the foot of the Mealy Mountains.
Interestingly, the Mealy Mountains is a joint park
between the Innu Nation and Parks Canada.
It's the largest intact forest left on this planet.
It is home to over 5 billion birds.
It's got a quarter of the world's wetlands,
a fifth of the world's freshwater.
It actually absorbs twice as much carbon
as tropical forest per hectare.
And so, in terms of climate regulation,
this is the most important
terrestrial landscape on the planet.
There's a movement afoot, several movements afoot
around the planet, but especially here
for First Nations and obviously in Indigenous groups,
to actually have a much stronger part
in protecting and preserving these lands.
Why is that so important?
Well, you know, 80% of the world's remaining biodiversity
is on lands that are loved by Indigenous peoples.
And that's not an accident.
It's because we know that
we're responsible for those landscapes.
And unfortunately, Western society has lost its way.
And, so we're finding that more people
are looking to Indigenous peoples
and looking to us for new ways
of thinking about that relationship.
How do you feel about the biodiversity loss
that these lands are going through right now?
I feel grief.
I feel a loss of responsibility,
and I feel guilt that we've gotten to this place.
But I also know that not all is lost.
You know, the world is resilient.
The land is resilient. We are resilient.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: Valérie has spent years
lobbying the Canadian government to invest in
protecting these ecologically rich environments.
And her work led to the creation of a group
known as The Guardians, a First Nations-led initiative
across the country tasked with defending
the long-term health of the land.
Together, they steward not
on \h ly these fragile ecosystems
but also an ancient way of seeing themselves
in relationship with the land itself.
- Yeah. - Cheers.
Man: This is the first time that we talked about
working as a superintendent here in the National Park
and also with working with Innu Nation.
We've been asked to do up a guideline...
- Mm. - About how to protect it.
And I say to the government
that we've been doing this for thousands of years.
If we didn't manage the way we managed,
there wouldn't be any animals.
There wouldn't be any resources at all.
And now you're expecting us to write it and put it on paper
and have it stamped and say this is how it is?
It's a way of thinking. Exactly.
It's a mindset.
Man: In the Western world, you get people
that want to overcut, want to overkill,
want to kill every fish in the water,
every caribou that walks on the Earth.
But the Innu, they don't think like that.
There's not clear cut in the whole area
just for profit or to sell to somebody else.
They just think, OK, I just need this for this long,
or I need this to feed my family and my mother-in-law.
So, I'll take this many salmon out of the river,
and then I'm done.
I think we need to-- we need to go kind of go back
to that relationship and make a conscious effort to do it.
I think if more people were connected to the land,
we'd be a much better world.
Mm.
♪
Courtois, voice-over: Our
la \h nguages come from the land.
Our practices, our laws,
everything comes from the Earth.
We can learn those things again.
I don't know about you,
but I want to be here for a little while.
Yeah.
And I want my children to be here for a little while.
And I want my grandson to be here for a little while.
We have a role to play and we should be
helping decide and taking care of this place.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: It's an unforgettable experience
to spend time with people
wh \h o simply refuse to give up,
building on ancient wisdom to
lo \h ok beyond our modern moment
to a future worth fighting for.
These are the stories we need right now.
It's so easy to see what's wrong
and even easier to lose hope altogether.
But the creativity comes in finding new ways
to do something about it.
I'm in Rotterdam to meet Boyan Slat,
who's doing this very thing, inventing a technology
designed to give our oceans a second chance.
Tell me how you got started.
I was 16 years old. I went scuba diving in Greece.
And I was hoping to see all these beautiful things.
Then I looked around me, and I just saw a garbage dump.
I just saw more plastic bags than fish.
And I was so dismayed and shocked by that
that I asked myself a simple question.
Why can't we just clean this up?
♪
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is
the largest accumulation of
trash in the world's oceans.
It's an area halfway between Hawaii and California.
It spans twice the size of Texas,
and it contains about 250 million pounds of trash.
Plastic is one of the largest threats our oceans face today.
There's now 700 species
known to be directly impacted by plastic pollution.
A few hundred of those
are actually threatened with extinction.
The most uncertain factor but perhaps
even the most impactful factor
is the health impact to us humans.
Plastic breaks down
in \h to smaller, smaller pieces.
They transport toxic chemicals into the food chain,
and that's a food chain that includes
more than 3 billion people that rely on fish
as their key source of protein.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: Boyan and his team are working towards a goal
to clean up 90% of floating plastic pollution.
And here's the most powerful part.
It took several attempts
be \h fore they created something
that even had a chance to achieve that.
It was touch and go.
People said the system he was inventing
would never work.
But then it did.
♪
Slat, voice-over: So, the system itself
is a long, U-shaped floating barrier
that we drag forth very slowly
just to make sure that the fish can escape in time.
It acts like a funnel.
Pl \h astic goes towards the center
where we have what we call the retention zone,
which is a collection bag.
Every few days when it's full, we take the bag onto a ship.
We empty it, sort the waste,
and then ultimately, we bring it back to land for recycling.
♪
Actually, the oldest object we ever collected.
And you can see how it's been degraded.
Yeah. So, these flakes are coming off.
The thing is because of UV light,
because of the sun,
the plastic becomes more brittle.
So, then, layer by layer, like an onion, it kind of peels.
So, this eventually can end up in the fish that we eat.
Yeah, and this can turn into
millions of pieces of microplastics.
Yeah. So, in here, what you see is the,
essentially, the recycling process in steps.
So, actually, half of what we get out of
the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is fishing nets.
- Mm-hmm. - So, it looks just like this.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I would say probably the most harmful type
because this, of course, ensnares a lot of wildlife.
So, what we then do is we wash it,
and we shred it to get to this kind of pulp.
Yep.
And then ultimately, we injection-mold it,
we compound it, so, we add some additives
to make sure that the materials is safe and high quality.
And then it becomes this.
So, these are what you call pellets.
And these are the building blocks for any new object.
So, you can just mold this into something new,
and the idea is that we are producing durable,
sustainable products out of this,
and with that, help fund the cleanup.
Actually, as a proof of concept,
we made these sort of
high-end designer sunglasses.
Wow. So, this is 100% made from
the plastic we took out of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
They look good on you. These are great.
So, if the Garbage Patch is cleaned up in 10 to 15 years,
what's to prevent another one 20 years from now forming?
Realistically, the amount of plastic that's being produced
is not going down.
In fact, the projections are that by 2060,
the amount of plastic produced will increase threefold.
So, really what we need to do is
we need to decouple the plastic usage
from the plastic flows into the ocean.
♪
We have interceptors now in 11 rivers,
some of the most polluting rivers in the world.
And we believe we can really stop most of
the world's plastic emissions from leaking into the ocean.
Wallach: What do you think when people say
what you're doing is impossible?
I think when somebody says something is impossible,
I think the sheer absoluteness of that statement
should make you suspicious of it.
If you look at history,
everything that we now take for granted
used to be impossible at some point in time.
So, if you're an entrepreneur,
if you're trying to make something,
if you're trying to create something, yes,
I think it's very important to listen
and to listen to people's advice.
But if there's one bit of advice
that you should really ignore,
it's people who say that something can't be done.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: The challenges facing Boyan and us all are daunting.
Intertidal times are full of danger,
but it's also where all the creative juice is.
And for those of us who want to push the envelope
on who we are and what's possible
on this planet looking forward,
this is our moment.
[Explosions]
Man, voice-over: Man, one of the most fragile of Earth's creatures,
the builder of civilization,
entrusted by nature with the unique but dangerous ability
to alter the very conditions that gave him rise.
Wallach, voice-over: We've been in moments like this before.
The big one is moving from
hunter-gatherer to agricultural.
That was maybe 10,000, 12,000 years ago.
We went from being in small clans and tribes
to now actually starting to urbanize.
We also have things like the Gutenberg press.
So, we went from an era
where knowledge could only be held by a few people
to now being able to mass-create knowledge
in a way that would actually bring it out to people.
Now, from that, you got the Reformation
and all sorts of upheaval around Europe
and around the world.
Another one is kind of moving from this idea
that the Earth is the center of everything,
to moving towards heliocentric models of how the world works.
Moving from us being the center of the universe
to just being one kind of node in a multi-noded galaxy
and universe was highly disruptive.
The Industrial Revolution, moving from this idea
that the power that we had in the world
was just what we could do with our own hands and backs
and change where we lived, what we ate, how we travel.
It changed how we fought wars.
And it also fundamentally changed the way we told stories
about who we are and where we're going.
When we go through these moments
of flux and creativity,
all sorts of new things start to arise.
♪
That's the potential before us right now.
These threats and challenges hold opportunities
to remake the world.
As the old ways break down and fall apart around us,
what does it look like
to \h reimagine what comes next?
In Albany, Eben Bayer and his team at Ecovative
are working to answer that question...
using mushrooms.
♪
So, we're going to head right over here.
All right. So, as I understand,
this is kind of just a beautiful piece
of mycelium, basically, in a sense.
- Yeah, yeah. - Like foam-like substance.
What is this?
This is a leather-like material.
We call it a forager hide.
And it's made from this foam.
We just squish it and tan it and color it
and you get something that behaves, looks,
and feels a lot like leather.
So, how long will this last?
So, this particular leather-like hide
will last for a year or two
in this application as tanned.
You could make it last longer by putting
other tannery chemistries in,
like we use for conventional leather.
So, this is where we actually
started with something called mushroom packaging.
These are just little corner blocks
that would go on a box you might get in the mail,
and, you know, they've got little breakaways on them.
And then when it gets to you, unlike Styrofoam,
big difference is you can just start to break this up.
If you have a compost at home, you can put it in your compost,
or you could put it in your yard waste bin.
And within 30 days,
this will turn into a nutrient, not a pollutant,
in whatever your local ecosystem is.
What are the biggest problems
that you're trying to tackle here?
The problems that we focus on at Ecovative
are around plastic pollution, so, this idea that we just
created this incredible miracle material
that can't degrade, and it's, like,
clogging up the lungs
and everything of our Earth's ecosystem.
And the other is around animal agriculture,
so, the mass production of animals for food or materials.
I grew up farming in Central Vermont.
It's fine to raise animals.
Doing it industrially is not ecologically responsible
or ethically responsible.
...here. Those units over there...
Wallach, voice-over: Eben sees times of
di \h sorder and chaos like these
as full of opportunity for transformation.
Rather than simply seeing problems,
he sees openings full of potential
to invent entirely new ways of doing things
that most of us take for granted.
Welcome to the magic store.
♪
So, what you're seeing here are the aspects
of a conventional vertical mushroom farm.
You've got your shelving system here.
You've got your environmental controls.
And now we've modified it to use the soil we use
to grow our special forms of mycelium.
And rather than getting a bunch of mushrooms
growing out of that bed, you're actually getting
a slab of mycelium tissue. That's really the power.
- There's no wasted space. - There's no wasted space.
- Because it's sheer mycelium all the way across.
- Yep. - Like in a slab.
Well, one of these rooms could produce
20,000 pounds of mycelium.
So, a harvest machine will pull up.
And it comes out like a conveyor.
It comes across and squishes into basically
like a pork belly, or a mush belly, we call it.
And then those come off
and those go to the bacon facility.
- Wow.
♪
Wallach: So, now, this came out in a block.
Bayer: Yeah.
Wallach: And then you started slicing it?
It rides along just like
a piece of pork belly would be.
So, run it through the slicer,
you get your slices of bacon,
you add salt and sugar and some natural flavorings.
And then at the very end,
we put the coconut oil on, which is the fat,
because mushrooms don't have any fat in it.
And this is minimally processed.
Sliced and smoked, basically.
Compare and contrast the inputs
that would go into, you know, 5 pounds of this
versus 5 pounds of bacon from a pig.
So, to produce a million pounds of our product
takes about an acre of land
in \h one of our vertical farms,
and it occurs over about 10 days.
To produce the same amount of bacon using a pig,
you'd need about a million acres of land.
- Hmm.
- And you would also need
to feed that pig high-quality food,
so, like, grains versus woodchips.
And then you have to grow them
for a period of 6 to 9 months.
And so, in each of those dimensions, land use,
the input material, and the time frame,
we're massively, like by an order of magnitude,
improving the equation. - Mm-hmm.
♪
Tastes like bacon.
Now, tell me, where does this go,
because so far, we've heard about packaging, right?
Obviously, there's food, and you've mentioned leather.
- Yeah. - Where do you take this?
My dream is we grow everything.
You know, I think we can grow almost everything around us
from the buildings to the medicines we need
to the food we eat.
And we'll do that through structural materials,
nutritional materials,
and even things that might be alive when you use them.
Such as?
Well, you could imagine a building that
senses the environmental conditions within it
and maybe even releases beneficial compounds to,
like, clean the air.
You can imagine buildings in an earthquake develop cracks
and in those cracks, there are, like,
embedded little water balls that break open.
And the fungus is not dead but is dehydrated,
which it can do, and it'll start growing
and seal up all those cracks.
Mushrooms are uniquely situated to save the world.
Wallach, voice-over: What Eben and his team are doing here is inspiring
and it gives me a renewed sense of possibility
for the kind of futures we can choose
to create in this moment.
♪
Here in New York, an architect named Bjarke Ingels
is working with a similar perspective
to reimagine the cities in which we live.
Ingels, voice-over: I think
ma \h ybe the best way to explain what's so special
about architecture and the power of design
is that the Danish word for design isformgivning,
which literally means form-giving.
When you design something, you're giving form
to that which has not yet been given form.
In other words, you are giving form to the future.
So, when you're designing a place or a building,
you are giving form
to \h a little part of the world
that you would like to find yourself
living in in the future.
♪
How do you think about the moment of time
that we're in right now?
It's kind of chaos and flux.
And a lot of people will want to look backwards,
where others will want to stick their head in the sand
to keep what they have.
How do you think about this moment?
Ingels, voice-over: We're living in a time where a lot of technologies
are bringing possibilities to the table
that we have never been even close to before.
And I sense that this innovation that has been
maybe locked in virtual in the last few decades
has finally arrived in physical space.
And maybe give you one example.
The building we designed in Copenhagen called CopenHill
is the cleanest waste-to-energy power plant
in the world.
The steam that comes out of the chimney
is actually cleaner than the air of Copenhagen.
Suddenly, the power plant no longer had to be
some ugly, dirty, polluting eyesore.
It could actually be a welcoming,
inclusive environment.
We could make the facade into
the tallest man-made climbing wall in the world
and we could turn the roof
into an alpine ski slope.
So, it's an idea we call hedonistic sustainability,
that the sustainable building or the sustainable city
is not only better for the environment,
it's also much more enjoyable
for the people that get to inhabit it.
Wallach: A lot of times, when people hear the term sustainability
or even regenerative, they think,
"Something's going to be taken away from me.
"It's not going to be as fun.
"I'm not going to be as happy.
I'm going to lose all these things."
That's not the way you think about it.
23 years ago, we opened
the Copenhagen Harbour Baths,
a simple floating structure that
extends the life of the city into the water around it.
On opening day, it became so clear
that the clean port is not only nice for the fish,
it's actually amazing for the people that live in that city,
and this idea that the sustainable city
is not only better for the environment,
it's much more enjoyable for the people that live in it.
Like half of the Copenhageners commute by bicycle,
not because it's environmentally friendly
but because it's the most enjoyable and effortless way
to move around the city quickly.
So, in that sense, we just
keep reminding ourselves that
there is a better and more
enjoyable way of doing it.
And I think the benefits
of a sort of environmentally friendly city is that it is
greener and cleaner and more enjoyable.
Wallach: Tell me
ab \h out the cities of the future.
Where are we going?
Where do we need to go? What does it look like?
Ingels: If you would return to Manhattan in 10 or 20
or maybe 50 years, you might see streets
that entirely become almost like linear parks
woven together in both directions of Manhattan.
People can walk and play
where you used to have traffic and parked cars.
You might have different kinds of personal mobility
also taking over whole areas.
Our cities will really become greener and more enjoyable,
which will make them more walkable and more bikeable.
So, I think a lot of the dichotomy between the city
and the countryside,
you're going to get
mu \h ch more interesting blends.
The city isn't the way it is because it has to be.
The city is the way it is
because that's how far we've gotten.
And if we would like to ask more of our city
or if we would like our city to accommodate
another kind of life than what it used to,
we actually not only have the possibility,
we actually have
a \h responsibility to make sure
that our city fits
wi \h th the way we want to live.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: In 1945, my mother was born in Oakland, California.
And very early on, she realized that where
she could kind of bring her gifts to bear in the world
was through creativity.
And so, she ended up becoming a professional artist.
Growing up, my mom would often bring paintings
that she was working on kind of back into circulation.
So, most people think of an artist
as someone who paints something.
They're done. They put it up on the wall.
My mom had paintings hanging in her garage
or around the house that she had painted
in the 1960s and '70s.
And every once in a while, I'd see one of those on the easel,
and she would kind of add to it.
And I'd say, well, "I thought that painting was complete."
She said, "A work of art is never necessarily complete.
It's up to the artist."
And so, what I learned is
even when you're crafting something,
that you can always come back to it.
You can always make changes
because you've learned new information.
You can take from the past. You can augment it.
It really means that things are fungible and changeable
as long as you're trying to make them better.
♪
Sometimes, the way to make things better
is to look at who needs help.
Where is there a need?
And how can we improve
on the way things are currently being done?
We have powerful new tools and technology
available to us right now.
And rather than just using them to entertain
or sell us more stuff,
we can meet actual human needs,
altering and improving the experience of being alive.
Woman: My name is Veena Somareddy,
and I'm the co-founder and CEO of Neuro Rehab VR.
We create virtual reality therapy applications
for physical therapy, occupational therapy,
for patients who might have gone through a stroke
or a spinal cord injury or Parkinson's or MS,
and we help them get back their limb function
as best as we can.
Physical therapy hasn't really
changed since the sixties.
It's very manual.
It's very tedious for the patient
as well as the physical therapist.
And sometimes, you need one or two therapists
working on one patient.
So, it's just not possible in a modern world
when there is shortage of clinicians
and also access to care.
What's the big opportunity for humanity
in terms of these new kind of digital reality realms
that are being built, and that we're kind of,
in many ways, kind of living into?
For me, I think on the health care side
would be access to care, access to care for anybody,
not--you know, in any socioeconomic status
that they're in, which has been a huge problem in health care,
being able to send our systems
to somebody who doesn't have access to therapy
so they can do it on their own in their own time
and get back that function that they might have lost,
and come back into society.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: Veena
di \h dn't just see what was broken
in the field of physical therapy.
She saw what was needed, what could be,
and created something new.
While we were at the clinic,
she let me experience the work for myself.
Somareddy: So, you'll have a green ball coming at you,
and you have to dodge it.
You can move to your left or you can move to your right.
- Now I see a picnic table. - There you go.
You'll see the ball coming at you.
There you go.
Do you feel like Neo from "Matrix"?
- Yes. - There you go.
I mean, obviously, this is helping with balance.
But what other things is this helping with?
Weight shifting is a huge thing with stroke patients.
- OK. - Because usually when they're affected,
when they have a stroke, they're paralyzed on one side.
And they're very afraid about
putting their weight on that affected side.
Is it that you can't do it
or it's like the fear of
doing it and what might happen?
It is mostly the fear,
especially with chronic patients.
They're used to what they cannot do, they know,
"This is what I cannot do, and these are my limitations."
And they're stuck with it. - Yeah.
But once you put them in an immersive environment
where they don't see the bias of their diagnosis,
that you don't see your body right now.
All you're concentrated on is on dodging that cannonball.
- I am. - Right?
So, that takes them out of that fear
of not being able to do something.
Now, what should I do with the chicken?
Should I eat it? You can eat it.
Yep. Exactly. [Chuckles]
I was working with a stroke patient.
And her goal for therapy was being able to
go grocery shopping with her grandkids again.
And so, we were like, let's create that.
So, you can practice everything that you'll
have to do in real life right here in VR,
so, it feels like you've done this before,
and you're not afraid.
So, you've got eggs.
So, what you're doing right here is pattern-matching,
being able to pattern match
from the item that's on the shopping list
to the item that's on the shelf,
which is something a lot of people can forget
or lose that after a stroke incident.
So, right here, we're able to simulate everything
from the touch, the feel, the visual aspects,
and the ambience, too,
so that they can get used to all of that
before they actually go into a grocery store.
Wallach, voice-over: Obviously, the VR that
you're mostly working on right now are people
who have suffered either from a stroke
or neurodegenerative diseases. Somareddy, voice-over: Right.
Wallach: But I would imagine it also can start
working for other traumas.
Somareddy: So, this is something that works
on also PTSD for veterans.
Exposure therapy has been shown to desensitize them
for the fear that they might have experienced,
the trauma that they might have experienced.
Just the sounds of being in a battlefield
can help them decrease that anxiety.
A fear of spiders, a fear of heights,
you can work on all of this in the virtual world.
And you know that you're not going to get hurt.
And then maybe go back to the real world
and be able to experience that
without the amount of fear that you might have had.
Wallach: The overlap between digital and lived realities
is growing every day.
And as new AI tools continue to expand what's possible,
Veena believes this work is only the beginning.
♪
[Upbeat pipe organ music]
AI has been around since the early 20th century
as a concept.
Voice: 1, 2, 3.
Woman: Hello, Kismet.
- Peek-a-boo! - I love you, doll.
In the nineties, we got computers
that could process vector graphics
for video games and that type of thing.
And that enabled a revolution to happen
in neural computation.
So, we could start to stack up layers of neurons,
and that's what's called deep learning.
And that's what's really advanced the field so much.
We could create a world where AI is just driving us
towards more consumption
and more recommendations of products.
Or we can create a world where AI is allowing us
to express different things,
to understand ourselves in different ways.
Whichever of those outcomes is more likely to happen
has a lot to do with who's making the AI
and why they're making it.
Wallach, voice-over: The conversation around artificial intelligence
is thrilling and complex.
And at the current speed of innovation,
it's hard to keep up with how fast
these tools are developing and to what end they will be used.
Greg Cross and his team at Soul Machines
have been working on these technologies for years.
What is surprising you most about the field
and/or the state of AI today?
We are living in a moment of time
where sort of AI has crossed the threshold from something
that the techies and the geeks talked about all the time
to it's now on the lips of, you know,
just about every human being on this planet.
Artificial intelligence--will it be the savior of humanity
or lead to our ultimate demise?
Woman, voice-over: Many people are going to ask,
"Why on Earth did you create this technology?"
Cross, voice-over: The speed at which things are moving now
is just, you know, astonishing.
You know, stuff that I used to think about, well,
that's 3 to 5 years away,
that's, like, now 12 months away now.
Wallach, voice-over: So, what are you and your team
working on right now?
So, Soul Machines sits at this intersection
of technology and entertainment.
We create avatars, you know, so, CGI characters.
And we bring them to life using some very,
very specific different fields of artificial intelligence.
So, our digital characters are alive.
- Mm. - They are digitally alive.
A lot of people feel we are very much
at a crossroads moment for humanity,
for our species on this planet.
But you're generally very kind of optimistic.
But what's driving most of that hope right now?
One of the really, really cool things about
artificial intelligence is
you're creating a learning system,
so, the way in which we simulate human behavior,
the subtlety which we can simulate human behavior.
I mean, this is about making, yeah,
it sounds like a corny phrase, but making AI your friend.
Woman on screen: It's great to meet you.
Patrice, what do you think the future will be like?
Patrice: I'm very optimistic about the future of AI
and how it will shape our lives.
The possibilities are endless.
Can you tell me about yourself, Patrice?
Patrice: Absolutely. I consider myself
a vibrant and professional personality,
and I bring energy and enthusiasm to everything I do.
Patrice, how will AI change what it means to be human?
Patrice: On one hand, AI can help us
achieve things that were once impossible.
At the same time, we need to remember
that AI is still a tool and cannot replace humans
when it comes to making decisions.
Tell me more about the work that goes into
creating something like this.
Yeah. So, you know, Patrice is what we call
a synthetic digital person.
So, she doesn't exist in real life.
She's not a clone of a real person.
So, she's entirely made up.
So, to create Patrice, we've built a creation suite
we call Digital DNA Studio.
Wallach: So, right now, there's a lot of fear and concern
about what AI could do to us, do to humans.
How do you see this?
Well, I mean, at the end of the day,
I think the debate is really, really the most positive thing
that can happen at the moment in terms of people
talking about what it means
for the businesses that they work in,
the industries that they compete in,
the communities they live in, the type of
regulatory environment they would like to see.
But the debate is absolutely critical.
Allado-McDowell, voice-over: You have to look at the holistic picture
of everything that's happening right now.
AI is not happening in a vacuum.
It's a really profound technological shift.
But it's also happening alongside
mass extinction, climate change,
the greatest economic inequality that we've had.
We're becoming aware that our actions have global effects.
♪
Bremmer, voice-over: When we start talking about artificial intelligence,
that's the first thing in our history
that has the potential to either
change us as human beings into a future form
or extinguish us.
There's never been such a thing.
♪
Allado-McDowell, voice-over:
Th \h is is part of a profound shift
in how we see the role of the human.
And that's a little scary but also potentially very hopeful.
Because I think a lot of the reason
we're having these perceptions is because of problems.
It's because of things that
human-centricity created, shortsightedness.
If we think about AI in the long term,
it really does matter what we do now
because it will affect future generations
just like it does with everything else that we do.
We cannot be narcissistic as a species.
♪
Wallach: So what should we be optimizing for?
As leaders, if you want to galvanize
and bring people together, you have to have a vision.
You want to co-create that vision.
But you need to-- you know, there's a telos.
There's an ultimate aim.
There's a goal if we want to move forward.
And I will put on the table that we've lost that.
So, take me there.
I think we are at an inflection point.
Like across society, we have this access to amazing technology.
We have people that are thinking differently
about what is their purpose?
What is the world going to be in 2040?
So, that gives us a chance to make change
and make decisions that can be beneficial to all.
However, we can very much have all these conversations
and not make any decisions.
So, nothing actually does change.
So, my fear is that while we have this opportunity
that we don't take advantage of it,
and then we're continuing to live through the same things
years from now.
Are we providing basic human rights, basic human needs?
And then beyond that, like, how do we incentivize
that innovation which pushes GDP, that solves cancer,
that brings AI into the new age
and allows us to just sit and make music all day
instead of having to worry about, you know,
building another slide deck.
Woman: I would like to challenge you on GDP.
Man: OK. Woman: Because I feel like GDP
is what we're all chasing now.
The question is, like, up until what point?
Some people or some corporations
are super successful,
they drive innovation, they drive the GDP.
But actually, the rights you're chasing after
or the equality or equity isn't achieved because of that.
And I feel like GDP doesn't account for
all of those things we care about,
and I feel like that's not always money-related.
It sounds like to answer your question,
we need a social contract.
That's the thing I'm tying together
from everyone's answers is there's a need
for accountability from people
that we're going to call leaders.
It sounds like we need to hold each other accountable
in some contractual way that emphasizes the need for rights
and no harm to others.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: When I look around and I see people
working on projects and ideas,
they're not all just thinking, how do I get as much as I can?
Like, what's my little pot of gold?
I see the folks who are building and making
better tomorrows for themselves,
for their kids, my kids, future generations.
I mean, I see things that are being worked on right now
that are going to have downrange impact
for the better for hundreds of years.
Courtois, voice-over: We're in a world of turmoil.
The human nature in turmoil is to kind of cocoon
and to become more conservative.
If you're insular, then you don't learn.
We could do better.
We can imagine a better future
and work on it together.
Ingels, voice-over: My son was born right around the time
we finished the CopenHill Power Plant.
So, he doesn't know... Wallach: Mm.
that there was a time when
you didn't ski on the power plant.
For him, that's just like a natural part
of the landscape of Copenhagen.
So, if that's the normal for him
and his generation of Danish kids,
imagine when they have to start coming up
with what-if scenarios for their future.
They're going to come up with some pretty wild stuff.
Bayer, voice-over: Innovation occurs at the intersection of things.
The greatest opportunities are in chaos.
In times of, like, change,
there's a maximum opportunity to change everything.
The future is all about integrating
different interdisciplinary areas into one.
So, anybody who is younger,
go beyond just the computer science.
Look at the arts.
Look at what's happening in marine biology
and then neuroscience.
And you'll be able to bring all of those ideas into one
and create something that
nobody might have thought about.
Slat, voice-over: Progress is not inevitable,
and it really requires conscious effort.
Sometimes, people ask me, why you?
Why did you decide to work on this?
And I think it's a strange question.
A much more interesting question to me
is why isn't everyone doing this?
If there is something that's bothering you,
I think it would be strange to just wait
for somebody else to solve it.
♪
Wallach, voice-over: Hundreds of years from now,
they are going to look back
on our moment that we're in right now
as potentially the most pivotal in human history.
The decisions that we make around our technologies
and how we're going to live on this planet
will actually dictate who and what we are to become.
We have to ask ourselves,
in \h this moment of complexity,
what is it that we want to see happen?
Where do we want to go?
♪
♪
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.