All language subtitles for dr._david_martin_gives_a_speech_to_the_eu_parliament_concerning_the_who (720p) (transcribed on 16-Jan-2024 10-56-20)

Well, the translators are gone and the live stream is waning, which means that if we just

listen to my colleague Matthias, the best thing in the world would be to leave it to you

the people.

Now it's up to you to share what clearly based on the cavernous emptiness we see in

all of these spaces is only going to be heard if you share it.

So it feels very appropriate that I should be the one with the quietest voice.

But let's let that lie in roar, shall we?

I'm done talking about COVID and I'm done talking about SARS-CoV-2 and I'm done for very

simple reason. For 110 years we the people of the world have been lied to, where a group

of very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety

of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves

while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've

long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial

norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words. Those were the words

of the World Health Organization, and of Pfizer, and of Moderna, when they were given the authorization

to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals.

Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting

as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that

somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some saludatory benefit. Well, I'm

going to tell you since its formation in the 1940s, the World Health Organization has

been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will

show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is

actually provable by their own words in their own hand. And they use a force step process

to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then

they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing

that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation of 15

U.S. Code Section 19, which for those of you listening, coincidentally started with the

Clayton Act in the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States 1913,

the same year the World Health Organization's progenitors also started. So I find it fascinating

that we passed the Clayton Act in 1913 and we set in motion 110 years ago, the criminal

conspiracy, which we now call the World Health Organization 110 years later. And in violation

of TIFU or TEPHU, I don't know even how to say it, the TFU, the treaty allegedly for

the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the treaty

for the dysfunctional European cabal, Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions

that this was never a public health anything. It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling

terror to adapt the behavior of a population. Period. That's what it was. That's what it

always was. And we can come up with every theoretical argument we want to make about things,

but the problem even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable

for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe,

life insurance companies paid $30 billion less in claims. Now if there's a medical professional

or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate, then we could develop a

virus cunningly that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements,

and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask. It turns out that the data

is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic. We had genocide. And we need to call it what

it is. Next slide. When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand exactly the

not-so-fine print of the fine print. And I want to call your attention first to the

right hand column of the slide. This is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization,

the Welcome Trust, Path and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful worldwide program for

a malaria vaccine for children under the age of six months of age. And in their clinical

trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group

and then cunningly use the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28

children. Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because

it's exactly what it was because it turns out that this control group was not a saline

injection. It was not some sort of innocuous innocent thing. It was actually a cocktail

of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections. The control group was known to

kill people and the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe going to

kill people. And what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly,

under Article 5, Section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand

why I said at its formation in 1947, when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded

and founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section

13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement, immunity from personal arrest or detention

blah, blah, blah, immunity from legal process of every kind. Now if you didn't intend

to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity

from every form of prosecution and its worse, even investigation for prosecution of every

kind? People sit there and pretend, well that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize

this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity? This is a criminal organization

WHO set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were

going to
commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew

it because their first director general, none other than Dr. Ren Asan, who happened to

be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachao in 1940 earlier, in 1947, mysteriously

with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation was nominated to become the first director general

of the WHO. And within five short years, Ren Asan decided to authorize the real purpose

of the WHO in writing by then director general, Dr. Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population

control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this

room? This is not public health. This is the advancement of the same genocidal program

that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics Office at Cold Spring

Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie. People

stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing

but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set

up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it

controls who lives, who dies and who gets any chance at life. And if you think that I

am somehow inflating numbers, let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, if

I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might

conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest. And it turns out

that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those

come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of

every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States.

This is absolutely not only not an independent, charitable funded donation but more importantly

under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic. This constitutes directed donations which

specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World

Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime,

I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime and now the crime

of racketeering leading to murder and global terrorism. Next slide. I told you that the

second thing after they plan it is they fund it. And why don't we use the criminals language

in their own words because it's the best way to say it. When they actually planned the

release of the use of a biologically modified chimera associated with the model derived from

coronavirus, they actually said the following. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis,

we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such

as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and

remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding.

There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry.

That's the crisis. And let's read on. A key driver is the media and the economics will

follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues

investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. That is officially

the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the Decade of Vaccines

put in motion in 2011 by the global preparedness monitoring board of the World Health Organization

and it was the funding base for Peter Dashich's partnership with the Chimeric production

of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do

an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their

own words. Next slide. And now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing

to address which is the elephant in the room. On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple

conversations between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci where we've been told that

Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes. He has had in his possession

the letter that you see on the left. And it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead

sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill which unambiguously states that during

the gain of function moratorium which by the way if we use the word moratorium feels

like that means you're supposed to stop. Why don't we go ahead and look at two pieces

of this letter first the second bullet under project one which by the way was not part

of the original grant. This was to look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis

in vivo. You know what that means in living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical

simulations and models but this grant was modified with this letter to say we were

going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And

then we love the last paragraph of this letter which conveniently says as your grant is

currently funded this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium?

And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line or continue to conduct

the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period.

And here comes the problem. You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term

unlimited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually

funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out when you find out that there

is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end.

Unless you think that I am making an allegation which I am not I am making an accusation let's

be clear. And there is a big difference. I am not alleging anything. They actually went

to the trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus that was going to

get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen published in 2016 March 14th of

2016, the SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Erology virus one and I quote is poised for human

emergence. Does that sound like we are just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little

haywire in December of 2019 or does it feel like we were told look at Wuhan and look

at coronavirus and look at what we have been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan

and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and low and behold we are going to go ahead

and tell you that we are ready to release it in 2016. Next slide. We are almost done.

And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use

of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that. I happen

to be for the United States government in the early part of the 2000s and the latter

part of the 90s a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of

biological and chemical weapons. I am acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological

warfare agent is in the 18 U.S. code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical

weapons. And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. And the reason for that is

I am the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many

years. That is why I say it. But let's pretend for the moment that I am just a nut job.

Maybe I don't know what I am talking about. So why don't we look at what the criminals

said themselves, shall we? In 2005 at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation,

Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions

and billions of people's arms, that Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following

and let's go ahead and use his words presentation. Synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, bio-warfare

enabling technologies. Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does

that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does

biological warfare enabling technologies sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness?

It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies. And the reason why I have

that hunch is what followed was he received next to his NIAID grants, non-competitive DARPA

grants in matching funds for over $140 million of aggregate funding going into his and

his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies. So do I have

a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not,

because that's what they called it. And we know that they knew they called it that on September

18th, 2019. Because on September 18th, 2019, the racketeering, co-conspiring, cabal of

interlocking direct rates, also known as the World Health Organization, said that they

were going to conduct an experience for the world that was going to be a rapidly spreading

pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem.

They didn't say we're going to maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around. They

said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason,

September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universeled vaccine.

Not. We'll look at other options of treatment. Not. We'll have a look at what might be early

intervention as Dr. McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances.

Not that we stated on September 18th, 2019, we were intending to kill. And we were intending

to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion

no one would have accepted. And that's published by the criminal racketeers. Next slide. And

there's only two to go if you're following. Deploy and profit from it. We were told investors

will respond if they see profit at the end of the process and low and behold, guess what

they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100 billion for Pfizer of public funds.

Mederna, after lying to the Congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify

whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID where Anthony Fauci and

the entire team at NIH said that they had no financial interest in their recommendation.

They receive a back payment royalty of $400 million for the first payment of the royalty.

$400 million. More than any Institute of Health has ever received in a single payment

for a single invention in the history of American medical research. And low and behold, what

do we receive after that? A request from the World Health Organization to expand its budget

by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it and guess what they

just did. They laundered the money right back. That's what they did. Next, and now you get

to find a slide. This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional

crime. This is a criminal act. Done by a criminal institution, established to enable criminal

behavior since its foundation in 1947. That is what this is. And we should not be debilitating

the merits of democracy or liberty or anything else as irrational as that would be if we stood

at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not

the dollar bills. It's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health and it's not

public health and it's not the suppression of information and the suppression of dissident

views and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academic

admissions around the world who spoke out against this. That's not the crime. The crime

is that we had criminal racketeers WHO conspired and developed a quote emergency. The same criminal

racketeers planned, manufactured and did all agency capture to make sure that you were

told that you would use terms that they tell you to use. Vaccine, face mask, health, social

distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition. So we just used them.

Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came

together and fixed prices in direct collusion in violation of both European Union standards

and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These

were crimes. It was organized crime and we should treat it as such. Criminal racketeers

publicly lied under oath and this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty and

most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well-meaning people who

sit here today doing everything they can within their power to try to treat the calamities

created by this catastrophe. I will not for a moment denigrate the multiple contributions

of amazing academic and medical professionals who have tried desperately to step into

the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes. But I will without doubt say the

following. Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting

in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder until we have that conversation

we are having the wrong conversation because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified

agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to end the criminal organization

itself. This is my call to every single person on this planet. Don't just limit the power

of the WHO. Destroy the WHO. Thank you very much.