All language subtitles for Intro to Convene a clc - DVR

Introduction for Convening a Common Law Court

Welcome to the Common Law Court.

Today we will be convening a common
law court on behalf of the people.

In this case, the people will be represented
by the named plaintiff and the case has

been convened to address the issue of crimes
which have been committed against the people.

The court summons has already been issued
to the named defendant or defendants.

And we appear here today for the court hearing.

However, before proceeding, this video aims to
clarify why we are able to convene such a court.

Why we have the right to convene this case,
the procedure involved, as well as the

authority that we stand under to do so.

Throughout history, the people have developed various
judicial systems in order to help protect themselves

and their communities from any wrongdoings or harm.

The first records of judicial courts were
recorded in Greece in approximately 500 BC.

whereby any individual who had been wronged or who had
suffered a loss could take their claim to the community.

Within these communities, it was the people themselves,
although it was men only at that time, who would sit in

attendance while each of the parties presented their case.

Having listened to both parties and examined any evidence
that had been presented, this jury of peers would

then deliberate and issue a decision, a court order.

This jury would then also be responsible for issuing
any appropriate punishment that they deemed necessary

to correct the wrong that had been committed.

Centuries later, a similar system was
established within the British Isles.

This system was normally dealt with at a local level and
was confined to small areas, such as parishes and villages.

But was later developed to cover larger
regional areas that could include up to a

hundred such smaller communities in each.

But in developing this system further, it was decided
that there was a need to create a superior court in

order to deal with more complex issues and serious crimes
that weren't necessarily confined to the one locality.

And this was done under the authority of the Crown,
which at that time still meant the reigning monarch,

who then decided that they would take control
of the system by appointing their own sheriffs.

The additional bonus of appointing these sheriffs was that
they could also be used to collect taxes from the people.

So now we can ask the question.

Do we still then have a court of the people?

And the answer is no.

The judicial system is no longer a court of the people,
but is instead a corporate entity, which has continued

to develop over the centuries under the control of
the Crown, the government and other such corporations.

We no longer have a justice system that protects the people.

but a judicial process that is run for profit, whereby
all parties involved are registered corporations.

The courts, the police, the prosecution service,
solicitors and barristers are all registered companies.

And if you conduct a search for this information,
not only will you be able to establish this

as a fact, but you will also be able to obtain
their individual company registration numbers.

When the people convene their own courts,
They were used for addressing crimes which

had been committed against the people.

These courts involved living men and women and were
established in order to provide a lawful remedy for all.

The statutory court system is run by corporations
and can therefore only involve statutory legislation.

That is the law of contracts.

And in order to deal with people, that is living
men and women, they have to do so contractually.

And they do this by attaching a corporate entity called
the legal person to them and dealing with that instead.

Which in itself is binding the
people into a system of slavery.

Statutory courts cannot deal with living men and women,
and they have no authority or jurisdiction over them.

This fact is not only confirmed under common law,
but also under their own statutory legislation.

The United Nations Universal Declaration on Human
Rights of 1948 states that slavery is banned in all

its forms, and that you have the right to stand out
with any such association, including their society.

And confirmation that this is a form of slavery was
highlighted by the British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak

during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of
Commons on Wednesday 8 March 2023, when he openly

referred to the UK's social security system as follows.

If you arrive here illegally, you
will not be able to claim asylum here.

You will not be able to access the modern
slavery system, and you will not be able

to make spurious human rights claims.

You will not be able to access the modern slavery
system, the modern slavery system, the modern

slavery system, the modern slavery system.

You will not be able to access the modern slavery system.

That is the right thing to do.

Now in establishing that the statutory system can only deal
with corporations and persons, we have also established that

living men and women are being deprived of lawful remedy.

And in such a position, we have the
lawful right to create our own system

and our own courts.

Since the creation of the Common Law Court in
2017, we have established our own courts and

issued our own documentation and court orders.

None of these documents or orders have ever been challenged.

And that is because they were created lawfully
and carry with them the authority of the people.

So now that we have confirmed why we can convene our own
courts, We refer you to the following video to clearly

explain the exact procedures which must be followed in
order to properly convene a lawful common law court.

It is crucial to note, however, that anyone actively
taking part in these proceedings may only do so after

first of all having made a declaration to the fact that
they are indeed a living man or woman, standing solely

under the authority and jurisdiction of the people.

Persons, Corporations and any other such statutory entities
cannot and will not be permitted to participate.

Thank you.