All language subtitles for 11-11-2023vghvhgvchjEEE

The active actions of the AFU on the left
bank of the Dnipro River have divided those

observing the war in Ukraine into both those
who are seriously considering the possibility

of a "breakthrough to Crimea" along this direction
and skeptics.

But so far, real events indicate that the
Russian command in the Crimean-Taurian direction

has received an obviously significant "headache".

That is a fact.

As far as I understand, everything is going
"according to plan" there, however, clearly

not Russian.

At least, 2 tactical bridgeheads of the AFU
in the area of the automobile and railroad

Antonivka bridges have already merged into
1, while becoming a bit bigger.

And, to all appearances, the AFU are holding
it quite "tightly".

How does the new commander of the Dniepr group
react to all these events?

Of course, in the style typical of the Russians:
by transferring additional forces and means

to the "dangerous area", as well as conducting
numerous series of attacks in non-stop mode.

And the introduction of military formations,
units and subdivisions into the battle is

taking place, as usual, as they are being
concentrated and deployed.

In particular, the Russian command wants to
return to the left bank of the Dnipro River

the units of the 7th Airborne Assault Brigade,
which were only recently transferred to the

Tokmak direction, where they were supposed
to strike at the flanks of the advancing AFU

group.

But with "flank counterattacks" in the Tokmak
direction the occupants still did not get

anything good, and Ukrainian marines arranged
a fatal meeting for the Russian motorized

riflemen.

The enemy will soon be forced to "deal with
the problem of Ukrainian bridgeheads" on the

Dnipro.

After all, if this issue is left to the "winding
up", the AFU will be able to get a stretch

of coast on the right bank of the river, where
the bulk of Russian artillery will not reach.

Of course, it will still need to be securely
covered from the air, but there are reasonable

hopes on this matter.

It is also interesting to see what assessment
the enemy gives to the actions of the AFU.

Several Russian resources that are more or
less adequate, if one can even say so, quite

unanimously came to the conclusion that the
AFU planned, organized and worked out their

actions across the Dnipro River in advance.

- The Russians were unpleasantly struck by
the speed and efficiency of the AFU units,

especially in the area of increasing their
efforts.

- They also concluded that the Ukrainian command
had found a way, unknown to them yet, to provide

replenishment of its forward units and to
organize their logistical support in sufficient

quantities and with appropriate efficiency.

Otherwise, the AFU's forward units would not
have been able to conduct intensive combat

operations on bridgeheads for a long period
of time, and they are also managing to expand

them.

- It is also obvious that the width along
the front and the main areas and directions

of the active actions of the AFU "across the
Dnipro" were not chosen at all by chance.

They are clearly tied to the nature of the
terrain, the composition and operational structure

of the Russian troops, even the level of water,
the most successful and convenient places

for landing and hidden progress in the floodplain
are taken into account.

Given the onset of winter, when logistics
will directly depend on weather conditions,

will the establishment of a bridgehead on
the left bank of the river lead to a full-fledged

operation of operational level ? I would like
to believe so, but a lot depends on the partners,

and more precisely on military assistance.

The main thing is that they should not forget
that human resources are not infinite.