Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,375
Contour maps are an effective way of depicting
2
00:00:03,375 --> 00:00:08,340
a three-dimensional surface using two-dimensional flat lines.
3
00:00:08,340 --> 00:00:11,805
So, let's see how we can use contour maps to show surfaces.
4
00:00:11,805 --> 00:00:14,340
So, here I have a satellite image of
5
00:00:14,340 --> 00:00:17,970
Whistler BC which is in a nice beautiful mountainous area.
6
00:00:17,970 --> 00:00:19,410
I've actually never been to Whistler,
7
00:00:19,410 --> 00:00:20,870
so I would really like to go there,
8
00:00:20,870 --> 00:00:22,200
but let's just have a look at it.
9
00:00:22,200 --> 00:00:28,040
So, this would be a way of showing the terrain for that using contours.
10
00:00:28,040 --> 00:00:31,900
So, these green lines represent a 200-meter contour interval.
11
00:00:31,900 --> 00:00:35,565
What that means is that the vertical distance,
12
00:00:35,565 --> 00:00:39,650
the vertical elevation between that line and that line is 200 meters.
13
00:00:39,650 --> 00:00:42,080
Now, the horizontal distance could be
14
00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:44,600
something else depending on the steepness of the slope,
15
00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:46,770
but the vertical distance is 200 meters from there to there,
16
00:00:46,770 --> 00:00:48,535
it's another 200 meters from there to there,
17
00:00:48,535 --> 00:00:49,690
and there to there, and so on.
18
00:00:49,690 --> 00:00:51,500
As you probably are already gathering,
19
00:00:51,500 --> 00:00:53,610
the closer together they are,
20
00:00:53,610 --> 00:00:54,620
the steeper the slope,
21
00:00:54,620 --> 00:00:56,265
and the farther apart they are,
22
00:00:56,265 --> 00:00:57,840
the more gradual the slope.
23
00:00:57,840 --> 00:01:00,570
So, this is a way of being able to depict this terrain,
24
00:01:00,570 --> 00:01:02,930
this three-dimensional surface with
25
00:01:02,930 --> 00:01:06,090
these nice simple lines that we can put on top of our map.
26
00:01:06,090 --> 00:01:08,265
We can vary the interval.
27
00:01:08,265 --> 00:01:12,055
Here we have a 100-foot interval instead of a 200-meter interval,
28
00:01:12,055 --> 00:01:15,080
and since feet are smaller than meters,
29
00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:17,370
we end up with more lines here.
30
00:01:17,370 --> 00:01:21,080
So, there's a good and a bad thing here,
31
00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,870
it's that there's more lines which I think is to the point
32
00:01:23,870 --> 00:01:27,050
where it's getting almost a bit distracting especially with this line thickness,
33
00:01:27,050 --> 00:01:31,340
but we are getting a lot more detail in terms of what we're able to see.
34
00:01:31,340 --> 00:01:36,210
So, you can see there's a little peak there and there perhaps, and there.
35
00:01:36,210 --> 00:01:40,460
So, we're getting more detail in terms of the terrain itself,
36
00:01:40,460 --> 00:01:44,485
but you have to be careful because it depends on what the subject if your map is.
37
00:01:44,485 --> 00:01:48,545
Often, if it's a topographic map or a reference map where
38
00:01:48,545 --> 00:01:53,300
the contour lines are just one of many different map layers or themes on the map,
39
00:01:53,300 --> 00:01:56,360
you don't want it to take over the map or to be too obvious.
40
00:01:56,360 --> 00:01:57,910
You want it to be a little more subtle than that,
41
00:01:57,910 --> 00:02:00,265
and so having a 100-foot interval,
42
00:02:00,265 --> 00:02:03,380
it might be useful in our formation depending on your map reader,
43
00:02:03,380 --> 00:02:07,990
but you have to balance that out with how much is it cluttering your map.
44
00:02:07,990 --> 00:02:10,370
For the purpose of comparison,
45
00:02:10,370 --> 00:02:16,080
I've added in a digital elevation model which is a raster way of depicting a surface,
46
00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:17,350
and that's what we have here.
47
00:02:17,350 --> 00:02:21,050
So, you can see there's the bottom of the valley here,
48
00:02:21,050 --> 00:02:23,090
and then we go up the side of the slope here.
49
00:02:23,090 --> 00:02:25,780
So, this is using a raster data model.
50
00:02:25,780 --> 00:02:27,880
If I add in the contour lines,
51
00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:29,580
this is a vector data model.
52
00:02:29,580 --> 00:02:33,395
So, this is a different way of depicting the same terrain.
53
00:02:33,395 --> 00:02:36,090
You're not going to get nearly as much detail,
54
00:02:36,090 --> 00:02:38,205
it's not as rich of a dataset,
55
00:02:38,205 --> 00:02:40,250
but depending on the purpose of your map,
56
00:02:40,250 --> 00:02:42,235
that might be all that you want to put in there.
57
00:02:42,235 --> 00:02:45,140
Typically, you wouldn't put both of them in at the same time,
58
00:02:45,140 --> 00:02:47,215
I'm just doing this so you can compare the two.
59
00:02:47,215 --> 00:02:50,455
So, for example, you can see there's this side valley up here,
60
00:02:50,455 --> 00:02:53,710
and so you can see that the contour lines follow that.
61
00:02:53,710 --> 00:02:59,220
So, you get a sense of how the lines are showing the terrain.
62
00:02:59,410 --> 00:03:04,280
Here we have the 100-foot interval just the same as I was showing a minute ago,
63
00:03:04,280 --> 00:03:08,165
and so again you can really see the detail that's visible
64
00:03:08,165 --> 00:03:12,975
with the enhanced version or more lines that we have or the smaller interval.
65
00:03:12,975 --> 00:03:14,750
This is a 3D perspective.
66
00:03:14,750 --> 00:03:16,555
If I put this together with ArcScene,
67
00:03:16,555 --> 00:03:18,410
if you're wondering how I made this.
68
00:03:18,410 --> 00:03:23,760
So I draped the vector contours on top of the raster digital elevation model.
69
00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:25,835
This is with a 200-meter interval,
70
00:03:25,835 --> 00:03:29,180
and I just thought this would be useful to get a better visualization of
71
00:03:29,180 --> 00:03:33,240
the steepness of the slope and how the contour lines follow those.
72
00:03:33,240 --> 00:03:35,940
So you can see that there and there for example.
73
00:03:35,940 --> 00:03:41,420
If I put in 100-foot interval as well just like I was doing before,
74
00:03:41,420 --> 00:03:44,179
I'm hoping that this helps you to see or visualize,
75
00:03:44,179 --> 00:03:48,040
for example there's this nice whatever you want to call it, peak-bump,
76
00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:53,145
whatever, and you got the contour lines going up the side just as you would here.
77
00:03:53,145 --> 00:03:54,350
At the bottom of the valley,
78
00:03:54,350 --> 00:03:58,540
they're quite far apart because it's fairly flat and as it gets more steep,
79
00:03:58,540 --> 00:04:00,780
the lines start to get closer and closer together.
80
00:04:00,780 --> 00:04:03,520
There's really not a lot to work with with contour maps,
81
00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:08,275
you can create contour maps from a digital elevation model in the software.
82
00:04:08,275 --> 00:04:10,870
I'm not really going to go into the details of that here.
83
00:04:10,870 --> 00:04:15,465
I just want you to know that these exist and that how to read them, how to look at them.
84
00:04:15,465 --> 00:04:19,440
But one of the few things you can do is you can change the interval itself,
85
00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:21,275
so that's how many lines there will be,
86
00:04:21,275 --> 00:04:23,140
and then the width of those lines.
87
00:04:23,140 --> 00:04:25,360
So here, the width is too thick.
88
00:04:25,360 --> 00:04:28,180
This is not a very good map and then the problem is
89
00:04:28,180 --> 00:04:31,345
once the line start to overlap each other like you're seeing here,
90
00:04:31,345 --> 00:04:34,490
then you're reducing the legibility of those lines.
91
00:04:34,490 --> 00:04:36,579
You're not able to tell them apart from one another,
92
00:04:36,579 --> 00:04:39,170
and so you're losing information because you're not able to
93
00:04:39,170 --> 00:04:42,185
actually discern those who're peak to no from one another.
94
00:04:42,185 --> 00:04:46,790
This is a nice example of the government of Canada topographic map,
95
00:04:46,790 --> 00:04:49,010
and I love the way they've put this together.
96
00:04:49,010 --> 00:04:51,275
I've always admired their map design
97
00:04:51,275 --> 00:04:54,800
in that there's a lot of information packed into these maps,
98
00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:57,110
and you'll notice that these contour lines also known as
99
00:04:57,110 --> 00:05:00,050
ISO lines or lines of equal value are there,
100
00:05:00,050 --> 00:05:01,840
and if you want to see them,
101
00:05:01,840 --> 00:05:03,355
if you want to pick them out,
102
00:05:03,355 --> 00:05:07,530
they're easy to see if you need to see them,
103
00:05:07,530 --> 00:05:09,190
but they don't dominate the map,
104
00:05:09,190 --> 00:05:10,805
they're not overpowering the map.
105
00:05:10,805 --> 00:05:12,425
If you're not interested in contours,
106
00:05:12,425 --> 00:05:15,405
if you're more interested in the rail lines or the roads or whatever,
107
00:05:15,405 --> 00:05:16,805
you can focus on those as well,
108
00:05:16,805 --> 00:05:19,210
and that's the sign of a good reference map.
109
00:05:19,210 --> 00:05:22,760
Just while I'm showing these topographic maps is a funny thing,
110
00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:24,420
but this was purely by accident.
111
00:05:24,420 --> 00:05:27,470
When I was putting it together, it's some Murphy's Law or something that of
112
00:05:27,470 --> 00:05:30,710
course the area that I wanted to map was at the edge of two map sheets.
113
00:05:30,710 --> 00:05:34,100
Not only that, one of them is using meters and one of them's using feet,
114
00:05:34,100 --> 00:05:36,100
so they're using different contour intervals.
115
00:05:36,100 --> 00:05:38,570
So, you've got these lines that
116
00:05:38,570 --> 00:05:42,540
don't match or meet up at all at the edge of the map sheet.
117
00:05:42,540 --> 00:05:45,230
Now, if I'm showing him out quickly and maybe nobody will notice,
118
00:05:45,230 --> 00:05:46,790
but if you're actually needed to depend on this,
119
00:05:46,790 --> 00:05:49,065
if you're out hiking or doing something like that,
120
00:05:49,065 --> 00:05:50,240
this would be a bit of a problem.
121
00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:51,770
So, this is unusual.
122
00:05:51,770 --> 00:05:53,330
It's not something you'd run across all the time,
123
00:05:53,330 --> 00:05:55,130
but I thought I would just mention it.10571
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.