All language subtitles for Plandemic 2 - Indoctrination-resync

In behalf of our center
and our partners

The World Economic Forum,
and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,

I'd like to extend a very warm welcome
to our audience here in New York,

as well as our larger virtual audience
participating online today.

The Event 201 scenario is fictional.

Today's scenario is going to simulate

meetings of a multi-stakeholder group
called The Pandemic Emergency Board.

We're at the start of what's looking
like it will be a severe pandemic,

and there are problems emerging
that can only be solved by global business

and governments working together.

There's been uh some conspiracy theories
that are around

about the potential that
pharmaceutical companies or the UN

have released this for their own benefit.

And maybe this is a time for us
to showcase some cases

where we are able to-to bring forward
some bad actors,

and leave it before the courts to decide

whether they have actually
spread some fake news.

A new corona virus.

Infected people got a respiratory illness

with symptoms ranging from mild
flu-like signs to severe pneumonia.

In related news,

a significant demand for
personal protective equipment

like N95 masks and gloves
are on the rise.

Patients are overwhelming
healthcare facilities.

People are avoiding public spaces
out of fear of infection,

and in compliance with
public health recommendation.

Our U.S affiliate has just released
polling results

on public expectations for a vaccine,

and 65% of those polled
are eager to take the vaccine,

even if it's experimental.

I'm not optimistic about
having a vaccine in time

to be relevant during this pandemic.

With enough money and political will
anything is possible.

Penalties have been put in place
for spreading harmful falsehoods,

including arrests.

If the solution means controlling
and reducing access to information,

I think it's the right choice.

What exactly are the risks and benefits
of staying home from work?

Absolutely, we need to save lives.

But we literally cannot afford
a heavy-handed response

that suffocates our economy.

The world saw large-scale protests,
and in some places riots.

This led to violent crackdowns
in some countries,

and even martial law.

The public lost trust
in their respective administration.

Economists say the economic turmoil
caused by such a pandemic

will last for years.

The societal impacts,
the loss of faith in government,

the distrust of news,
and the breakdown of social cohesion,

could last even longer.

We have to ask
"Did this need to be so bad?"

On May 4th 2020,

as part of a documentary series
called Plandemic,

I released an interview featuring
science whistleblower, Dr. Judy Mikovits.

The interview received fierce backlash
for spreading what the media declared

"dangerous conspiracy theories."

As a father
and a veteran media producer,

there is no way that I would release
harmful information into the world

during a moment
as vulnerable as now.

I had known Dr. Judy for two years
before filming her interview.

I read her book, then thoroughly
researched and vetted her story.

After interviewing her legal team,
former colleagues,

and people who have known her
for decades,

one thing I can say
without question is:

Judy Mikovits is one of the most

honest caring and courageous women
I've ever known.

Why then, would the most powerful forces
of Big Tech,

politics, media and medicine,

go to such extreme measures
to silence her voice all over the world?

And why did all of the debunkers
invest so much ink and air time

defaming Dr. Judy's character,

while avoiding very real revelations
pertaining to patents,

conflicts of interest,

and the deadly corruption pervading
our global health organizations?

To get to the bottom
of these questions,

as well as many others,

I've spent the last several weeks

interviewing scholars
from all over the world,

among them top doctors,
distinguished scientists,

and Nobel Laureates.

I also sat down with Dr. Judy
for a follow-up interview,

and to give her the opportunity
to respond to critics.

You can see that full interview
on the Plandemic website.

While you're there,
make sure to dive down the rabbit hole,

where you'll find additional videos,
documents, and scientific studies

that support the claims and perspectives
put forth in the Plandemic series.

Here are a few highlights from my
follow-up interview with Dr. Judy.

What do you have to say
to the people

who have tried to minimize
your involvement with HIV

by stating that you were
at the bottom of the totem pole,

13th author
of a 13-member group of scientists?

Well,
the 13th author is the senior author,

so that means
they're the most important author.

Why did you agree to retract
your own XMRV paper?

The paper was actually
force retracted.

I was actually being held in jail.

You told me that you had
financial offers to remain silent.

"If you simply say
you made a mistake,

and promise
never to say another word,

you can keep everything.
You'll get all of your grants.

You'll get everything back.

Millions of dollars.
You'll get publication and funding."

My lawyer said, "That's the best offer
you're going to get."

I said, "You don't understand me.

I don't need an offer.
I've already lost everything."

If I thought even one child or
one grandma was injured or killed

because I didn't do something,

that would have ended my life
as I know it.

There was no money
you could ever pay me

to get me to cover this up.

I will never stop telling the truth.

I'm the developer of
Linguistic Genomics,

which was the first platform

on which you could determine
the intent of communication,

rather than the literal artifact
of communication.

But we've also used that technology
for a number of other applications;

In defense and intelligence and finance,
and most notably,

in the early 2000s,

my company was
responsible for bringing down

what was at the time

one of the largest tax frauds
in U.S history.

We maintained a series of inquiries
into every individual,

every organization,
and every company,

that is involved in anything that either
blurs the line

of biological and chemical weapons,
or crosses that line,

in any of 168 countries.

In 1999, there were a million patents
digitized by IBM,

and those million patents
were the first time

human innovation had been put into an
electronic digital searchable format.

We took that information
and we did a very simple exercise

using our
Linguistic Genomics technology.

I made the horrific assessment

that approximately one-third of all
patents filed in the united states

were functional forgeries.

Meaning that,
while they had linguistic variations,

they actually covered
the same subject matter.

In 1999, patents on Coronavirus
started showing up,

and thus began the rabbit trail.

March 2003,
panic grips hong kong

as a deadly new virus
sweeps through the city.

In 2003,

the Center for Disease Control
saw the possibility of a gold strike,

and that was the Coronavirus outbreak
that happened in Asia.

They saw that a virus they knew
could be easily manipulated

was something
that was very valuable,

and in 2003
they sought to patent it.

And they made sure that they controlled
the proprietary rights

to the disease, to the virus,
and to its detection,

and all of the measurement of it.

We know that Anthony Fauci,
that Ralph Barrett,

that the Center for Disease Control,

and the laundry list of people

who wanted to take credit
for inventing Coronavirus,

were at the hub of this story.

From 2003 to 2018,

they controlled 100%
of the cash flow

that built the empire around the
industrial complex of Coronavirus.

The World Health Organization
has officially named...

An international
public health emergency.

Well we know that
the Coronavirus manipulation

started with Dr. Ralph Barrick
in 1999.

The major characteristics of Sars Mers
and Sars Coronavirus too...

Ralph Barrick is the researcher

at the
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

who's famous for his
chimeric Coronavirus research.

In 2002,
there was a recognition

that the Coronavirus was seen
as an exploitable mechanism,

for both good and ill.

On april the 25th 2003,
the U.S Center for Disease Control

filed a patent on the Coronavirus
transmitted to humans.

Under 35 U.S codes section 101

nature is prohibited
from being patented.

Either Sars Coronavirus
was manufactured,

therefore making
a patent on it legal,

or it was natural,
therefore making a patent on it illegal.

If it was manufactured,

it was a violation of biological and
chemical weapons treaties and laws.

If it was natural,
filing a patent on it was illegal.

Then either outcome,
both are illegal.

In the spring of 2007,

the CDC filed a petition
with the patent office

to keep their application
confidential and private.

They actually filed patents
on not only the virus,

but they also filed patents
on its detection,

and a kit to measure it.

Because of that CDC patent,

they had the ability to control

who was authorized
and who was not authorized

to make independent inquiries
into Coronavirus.

You cannot look at the virus.
You cannot measure it.

You cannot develop
a test kit for it.

And by ultimately receiving the patents
that constrained anyone from using it,

they had the means,
they had the motive,

and most of all,
they had the monetary gain

from turning Coronavirus
from a pathogen to profit.

Developing and owning
a Coronavirus vaccine

has become a biotech arms race,
with political overtones.

This vaccine gold rush
is starting to bother me.

Gold rush.

hmm...
Let's keep that in mind.

And so somewhere between
2012 and 2013, something happened.

The federal funding for research,
that was feeding into places like

Harvard,
Emory,

University of North Carolina Chapel Hill,

that funding suddenly became impaired by
something that happened at the NIH,

where the NIH got this little tiny
moment of clarity and said,

"I think something we're doing
is wrong."

And in 2013,
the NIH said,

"Gain of function research on Coronavirus
should be suspended."

The National Institutes of Health

had a moral and social and potentially
legal reason to object to research.

But the letters that were sent
to the researchers essentially said,

"You are receiving notice
that we're telling you to stop.

And now on the bottom of the page
we're going to clarify what stop means.

Keep going.

But when the heat gets hot
in 2014 and 2015,

what do you do you?
You offshore the research.

You fund the Wuhan Institute of Virology

to do the stuff that sounds like
it's getting a little edgy,

with respect to its
morality and legality.

But do you do it straight way?
No.

You run the money
through a series of cover organizations,

to make it look like
you're funding a U.S operation,

which then subcontracts with the
Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The U.S could say China did it.
China could say the U.S did it.

And the cool thing is both of them
are almost telling the truth.

[Music]

Where did the Coronavirus come from?

There is a new investigation
into its origins.

U.S intelligence officials
tell NBC news

that they are examining
whether the virus

accidentally came
from a chinese lab.

Chinese officials pushing back
against that claim on Thursday,

tweeting that it might be the U.S Army
who brought the epidemic to Wuhan.

I was the first person in the world
to look at an epidemic,

and study its characteristics,

and prove that it was due
to biological warfare

and was not a natural occurrence,

so I published that 28 years ago.

Early in this pandemic,

I did not think the Coronavirus
was a natural occurrence from bats.

I feel quite convinced that this
was a laboratory designed organism.

There have been
hundreds and hundreds of leaks

from high containment laboratories
that do research

on pathogenic Coronaviruses,
and other potentially lethal organisms.

I was particularly interested in a paper
that came out in Nature Medicine

by five scientists claiming that it
was definitely a natural occurrence,

rather than a lab construct.

But the arguments they used
did not hold water.

They didn't really make a lot
of scientific sense,

and yet all kinds
of very important people

started parroting
what this paper said.

And so that of course got me
scratching my head saying,

"Why are these people
risking their reputation,

when it's obviously illogical,
you know, doesn't hold water?"

Somebody must have
made them publish this,

and somebody must have
told these other people

that they have to say
it's a great piece of science.

You were quoted as saying,

"It was a meticulous job,
done professionally."

It could be done by somebody very
expert in molecular biology, I think.

Is it natural?
Is that what you mean?

No, it's not natural.

It was a job of proffesional.
A job of molecular biologists.

It's a very meticulous job.
We can say a precision...

But for what purpose?

For what purpose, it is not clear.

I am exposing facts.

My job here is to state the facts,
that's all.

See, the problem with all of this is the
evidence is right in front of our face.

And when confronted with evidence,

we are told fact checkers
are somehow transcendent.

The pace of our modern world makes it
nearly impossible for working people

to research the events and policies
that shape their lives.

When seeking answers
to life's most pressing questions,

where do we go first?
Google.

Enter the subject, hit Go,
and there it is...

only what they want us to see.

In today's culture
of copy and paste journalism,

it's common for hundreds of unrelated
outlets to feature the exact same report.

This is not the result of laziness.
This is by design.

When we see identical headlines
across seemingly unrelated platforms,

the logical mind concludes,
"Well then, it must be true."

The illusion that numerous news sources
have arrived at the same conclusion

gives us confidence
to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become
the unwitting pushers of propaganda.

Search engines are the holy grail for
those seeking to control the narrative.

Google is already more powerful,

in terms of its control
over people's lives,

than almost every government
on the planet.

As the most influential
search engine in the world,

through its ubiquitous reach,

Google has more power to influence
U.S elections than any foreign nation.

You testified before this committee.

You said, "In subsequent elections,

Google and Facebook and Twitter
and big text manipulation

could manipulate as many as 15 million
votes in a subsequent election."

And the methods that they're using
are invisible.

They're subliminal.

They're more powerful than

most any effects I've ever seen
in the Behavioral Sciences,

and I've been in the Behavioral Sciences
for almost 40 years.

The Blacklists is something that
Google said didn't exist,

and they testified that
under oath.

And nothing but the truth
so help you god?

I do.

Now me,
as an engineer,

I just did a search
on Google's internal search engine,

and guess what I found.

It had blacklisted search terms
like "cancer cures."

Why is Google deciding what people
can and cannot search for?

What was once an efficient tool
for navigating the world of information,

is now a network
for global surveillance,

data collection,
and social engineering.

Now let's take a look at a few of the
most commonly used fact checkers,

beginning with Snopes.

The husband and wife duo
of David and Barbara Mickelson

founded snopes.com in 1995.

They had no journalism background
or training whatsoever.

They built their fact-checking empire
by using Google

as the primary verifying source.

The Mickelsons divorced in 2015.

Barbara sued David for embezzling money
that he allegedly spent on prostitutes,

as well as a lavish honeymoon
with his new wife,

who worked as an escort in Las Vegas

before joining the
Snopes cast of characters.

In 2017, David Mickelson's new
business partners filed a lawsuit,

accusing Mickelson of multiple counts
of fraud and embezzlement.

Snopes proclaims to be

the internet's go-to source
for discerning what is true

and what is total nonsense.

Yet one glance, their history
of fact-free checking

tells another story.

When Dr. Micovits claimed
she was arrested without a warrant,

and jailed without a charge,
Snopes raided her statement 'false.'

Had they bothered
to explore the arrest documents,

they would have seen that
indeed there was neither a warrant

nor signatures to officiate a charge.

The fact that I confirmed with members
of Dr. Mikovits' legal team.

- Was there a search warrant?
- No.

And was she ever charged?

No.
Never tried for the crime.

100% correct. Judy has never
been charged with any crime.

Facebook's fact-checking arm -
Politifact,

is owned by the Pointer Institute,

which has received substantial funding
from Big Pharma allies such as Google,

and the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Like Snopes, Politifact has a history
of misleading the public.

In late January of 2019,

Politifact, Snopes and factcheck.org
raced to squash the notion

that Coronavirus and its treatments
were patented.

They reviewed only 3 of the 4,452
publicly available patents

which unmistakenly show that
Sars Coronavirus detection and treatment

have been widely patented
by both the public and private sectors.

Facebook's founder pledged to the WHO

saying they would remove false claims
and block exploitative ads.

They're working with the
World Health Organization

and with the NHS,

so they have a hotline, if you like,
from those official sources.

Wikipedia is the go-to destination

for introductions to people,
places and things.

Even the all-knowing Amazon alexa
calls on this digital encyclopedia.

Alexa, who is Dr. Judy Mikovitz?

According to Wikipedia,

Judy Ann MiKovits is a
former American research scientist

who is known for her
discredited medical claims.

She has been described
as an anti-vaccination activist

and a promoter
of conspiracy theories,

and has been accused
of scientific misconduct.

Wikipedia is supported by
the Wikimedia Foundation,

a non-profit parent organization,

with a long history
of politically tied funders.

Many named, many anonymous.

What exactly does a Wikipedia donor
receive in exchange for their generosity?

What began as an
unbiased open source platform,

is now weaponized
to undermine the work and reputation

of anyone deemed a threat
to its stakeholders.

And once they smear you,

they lock you out for
making corrections to your own bio.

In summary,

most independent fact-checkers
are neither independent nor factual.

Simply put,
they are political spin machines.

And so,
what they have done,

is they've decided that
there's an approved narrative.

If it is in line with the
CDC's public pronouncements,

and if it's in line with the World Health
Organization public pronouncements,

it is presumed to be correct.

I don't have to remind many Americans
that the Center for Disease Control

was the one that said you should use
DDT in your homes.

Used right, it is absolutely harmless
to humans and animals.

Remember the name DDT.

A scientific panel today reported

that pesticides may indeed represent
a grave threat to mankind.

Remember the swine flu scare
of 1976?

That was the year the U.S government
told us all

that swine flu could
turn out to be a killer?

And washington decided that

every man woman and child
in the nation should get a shot,

to prevent a nationwide outbreak,
a pandemic.

Well 46 million of us
obediently took the shot.

Did anyone ever come to you and say,

"There's the possibility
of neurological damage,

if you get into
a mass immunization program."

No.

- No one ever did?
- No.

I can't believe that they would say
that they did not know

that there were neurological illnesses
associated with Influenza vaccination.

That simply is not true.
We did know that.

uh And he's lying?

I guess you would have to
make that assumption.

Then why does this report
from your own agency

list neurological complications
as a possibility?

You didn't feel it was necessary to tell
the American people that information?

Dr. Sensor's CDC also helped
create the advertising

to get the public to take the shot.

The vaccines are safe,
so roll up your sleeve.

And now the Americans are claiming
damages from Uncle Sam,

amounting to 3.5 billion dollars.

By far the greatest number
of the claims, two-thirds of them,

are for neurological damage,
or even death.

There are serious concerns tonight

about how well the CDC controls
dangerous germs at its own labs,

after yet another safety lapse.

For the third time in a month,

the CDC acknowledged deadly pathogens
were handled incorrectly

in government labs.

That CDC is the CDC that allegedly
is looking out for your public health.

When we start with the assumption
that the official dogma

has to be the objective standard,

then what fact checkers look for
is a piece of published media

that confirms the statement made
by that particular organization.

And then debunkers and
conspiracy-theorists-blower-uppers

come in and say, "ah! We're gonna make
this thing clearly the scam that it is.

Every media outlet that is in the public
media right now has planted evidence,

and they have re-ranked pages.

So if you look today
at 'face mask wearing,'

and if you look today
at 'social distancing studies,'

you will see the studies that used to be

number one, number two, number three,
on the pages of page rank search,

don't exist anymore.

And what is there are studies
that wind up having headlines

that support the common narrative.

You're going to be hearing more
about advanced guidelines...

Because if you can keep people
from assembling,

guess what they're not talking about?

they're not talking about
the issues of the campaign.

If you can keep people in their homes

the only source of information that you
can have is what you curate for them.

Now I know
how to target my electorate.

They're in the only place
I allowed them to be.

Being fed the only message
I'm allowing them to hear...

through a media that I control.

[Music]

Since the invention
of the printing press,

there's been a battle to control
disseminated information.

In the early 1900s,
oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller

took control of every newspaper
and news editor of his era.

He became
America's first billionaire,

paving the way for the power hungry
ever since.

Thus began the gold rush for the
modern world's most precious resource

the narrative.

Do you have any people
being paid by the CIA,

who are contributing to
a major circulation American journal?

During a senate
committee investigation

it was revealed that the CIA
had been conducting a covert operation

to infiltrate and control
U.S media.

They called it
"operation mockingbird."

We do have people who submit pieces
to American journals.

Do you have any people
paid by the CIA,

who are working
for television networks?

This, I think, gets into the kind
of details, Mr. Chairman,

that I'd like to get into
an executive session.

Over 3,000 CIA contracted
and trained operatives

are placed in key positions
within top media outlets.

Posing as editors and journalists,

these well-paid actors never dared to
question the effect of their lies

on the world
beyond their cozy studio.

How often does the CIA
manipulate the media in this way?

It goes beyond
your wildest imagination.

Setting up student organizations so
they could draw radical students in.

5,000 university professors co-opted to
help the CIA manipulate people's minds.

Journalists in the U.S,
including big-name journalists,

co-opted to function routinely

to help the CIA put out stories
and biases to the world.

As this 1952 CIA memo says,

"The aim is controlling an individual

to the point where he will do
our bidding, against his will."

It's a great brainwashing process

to change the perception of reality
of every American,

to such an extent no one is able
to come to sensible conclusions,

in the interests
of defending themselves,

their families,
their community and their country.

Would you say that continues today?

Well, I...

Yeah, I would think probably for
a reporter it would continue today,

but because of all of the revelations

I think you've got to be
much more careful about it.

So how do we know that Operation
Mockingbird still isn't in effect?

Well, we don't.

It was the
Telecommunications Act of 1996

that opened the door
for predatory corporations,

to monopolize the industries
of print and broadcast.

This bill protects consumers
against monopolies.

It guarantees the diversity of voices...

Today, a handful of corporate empires
own and control the vast majority

of everything you
read, hear and watch.

From the biggest movie studios,

television and radio networks,
newspapers and magazines,

to the vast universe of internet news
and entertainment sites.

Amazon has transformed its operations
in response to COVID-19,

to protect their employees
and keep packageg flowing.

...And that is how it works.

It's like a house of mirrors,

where you're seeing the same thing
over and over and over again...

except it's distorted.

There's an industry that is paid

to go after and target journalists,
whistleblowers,

and inundate our consciousness
and the images we see,

to try to ruin, destroy or smear
the idea that they don't like,

or the person who's delivering it.

You smear somebody with falsehoods
and all the rest,

and then you merchandise it.

And then you write it,

and they'll say,
"See? it's reported in the press."

so they have that validation
that the press reported the smear,

and then it's called
"The wrap up smear."

Now I'm going to merchandise the
press' report on the smear that we made.

And it's...
It's a tactic.

News personalities are not
the only high paid actors

to serve the propaganda machine.

Most late night talk shows are owned
by the same corporate overlords

and thus follow the same script,
only laced with a laugh.

Our main story tonight
concerns conspiracy theories.

Last week, Tonight With John Oliver
featured a skit entitled

"Coronavirus conspiracy theories."

...like the claim that
the moon landing was faked.

First thing to note here

is that Mr. Oliver opens with commentary
about conspiracy theories

that are completely unrelated
to Coronavirus.

This is a standard tactic
used by propagandist to set a tone

so that anything that follows will be
seen through the lens of absurdity.

Plandemic, a pseudo documentary filled
with a hodgepodge of conspiracy theories.

Mr. Oliver then does his best
to debunk Dr. Judy's claim

that she was arrested
but never charged with a crime.

She was absolutely
criminally charged.

This was not an oversight,
but a blatant lie.

Prior to the taping of this episode,

Mr. Oliver had
the official arrest documents

that clearly prove that Dr. Judy
was never charged with a crime.

Mr. Oliver then attempts to debunk
the idea that a beach

AKA nature,
holds any value,

and boosting our body's
natural immune system.

Instead of challenging the point
with science,

he kills it with a smear.

Everything that you just said
is insane.

Television is not the truth.

We deal in illusions, man.
None of it is true.

But you, people,

sit there day after day,
night after night,

all ages, colors, creeds,

we're all you know.

You're beginning to believe
the illusions we're spinning here.

You're beginning to think
that the tube is reality

and that your own lives are unreal.

This is mass madness, you maniacs!

In god's name,
you people are the real thing,

we are the illusion!

So turn off your television sets.
Turn them off now.

Turn them off right now.
Turn them off and leave them off.

Turn them off
right in the middle of the sentence

I'm speaking to you now.

Turn them o...

In 1979, the world decided
that we needed the Bayh-Dole Act

because we needed
to reform our patent system.

And one of the modifications was we
allowed recipients of federal funding

to patent and retain economic interest
in the research that the public paid for.

You get a 5 million dollar grant
from the taxpayer,

and then you get to charge
the taxpayer a premium

for the technology
they paid to develop.

Pfizer is going to get
nearly 2 billion,

Moderna receiving 438 million dollars
in taxpayer money,

and yet both companies have said
they will not sell the vaccine at cost.

They're going to make
a profit on it.

Should pharmaceutical companies profit
off this vaccine research

that taxpayers have helped fund?

The Bayh–Dole Act
failed the American people,

because rather than
standing on the shoulders of giants,

we now kneel at the feet of greed.

My systems flagged anomalies
when I started seeing

non-profits and corporates
and cover financing

for Coronavirus programs
in the late summer and fall of 2019.

Our first red flag came out when
we read the World At Risk scenario.

Now there is an organization called The
Global Monitoring Preparedness Board.

This organization is a part of
the World Health Organization

and this board includes Dr. Elias
from the Gates Foundation,

and Anthony Fauci from NIAID.

These two individuals,

plus the director of The
Center for Disease Control in China,

come out with a recommendation
that says that by September 2020

two global pandemic preparedness
exercises have to be completed.

And one of them has to be done on
the release of a respiratory pathogen.

That then gave rise to an October event,
Event 201.

On behalf of our partners,
the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation...

Event 201 took place five months before
COVID-19 was declared a pandemic.

The participants of the event

are some of the same people
that are now deeply involved

in the real pandemic,
and profiting from it as well.

Event 201 was a scripted
multi-camera live event

that was broadcast globally
via the internet.

An event of this
complexity and magnitude

would take months to write,
prep and produce.

Placing the conception date at least
one year prior to the actual pandemic.

There is no question that
there will be a surprise outbreak.

Anthony Fauci knew
as early as January of 2017

that we would see an outbreak
before the end of 2020.

Even Bill Gates,
a man with no medical training,

knew it was coming.

If we start now we can be ready
for the next epidemic.

Every single thing that you have seen
play out in front of your eyes,

all of them laid out
in their tabletop exercise.

Which, by the way,
fact-checkers have said

has nothing to do
with the Coronavirus outbreak.

Just happenstance. This is that
wonderful universe of improbabilities

where events just co-emerge

and then nature conveniently
backs itself into our architecture.

That's-that's the scenario
we're supposed to accept.

[Music]

Brilliant.

Some countries have banned travel
from the worst affected areas.

The president has made a decision
to suspend all travel

to the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Dis and misinformation
circulating over the internet.

Across the world misinformation about
the virus is being shared online.

A significant demand for N95 masks
and gloves are on the rise.

The demand for N95 masks to prevent
the deadly airborne virus has such.

We could eventually have 52 million
treatment courses per year,

but it will take many months
to get there.

We're still many months out

from having something that
we can really deploy to the public.

And 65% of those polled
are eager to take the vaccine,

even if it's experimental.

The new poll finds that 49% of Americans
say they would get a COVID-19 vaccine

should an effective one be discovered.

I'm curious,
who wrote the Event 201 script?

If the visionaries of the event knew

at least one year in advance
what was needed,

why didn't they
take care of those things?

Considering that Bill Gates has donated

half of his fortune
to make the world safer,

why didn't he help to better prepare
our hospitals and frontline workers?

Why didn't any of the event's
wealthy sponsors do something?

Now here we are,
you know, we-we didn't simulate this.

We didn't practice.

On behalf of our partners,
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation...

So both the health policies
and economic policies,

we find ourselves
in unchartered territory.

[Music]

Event 201 was not
the first scripted exercise

to prophesize the future
with astonishing accuracy.

Leaders of global health and business

have been seeding reality with
fictional scenarios for several decades.

The scenario obviously is fictional.

One year prior to Event 201,

many of the same sponsors,
hosts and actors

came together to produce
a tabletop pandemic simulation

for a fictional virus
they branded Cladex.

One year to produce a vaccine for this
is too long.

We should have stockpiled,
we didn't.

But we're going to have to look
at that vaccine question

to see if we can
speed up the delivery.

And if we do not have the public with us,
we're in big trouble.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation
released a 54-page document called

Scenarios for the Future of Technology
and International Development.

Page 18 features
the pandemic scenario - Lock Step.

A world of tighter top-down
government control,

and authoritarian leadership
with limited innovation

and growing citizen pushback.

"China's government was not the only one
that took extreme measures

to protect its citizens
from risk and exposure.

During the pandemic,

national leaders around the world
flexed their authority

and imposed airtight rules
and restrictions.

From the mandatory
wearing a face mask,

to body temperature checks
at the entries to communal spaces

like train stations
and supermarkets.

Even after the pandemic faded,

this more authoritarian control
and oversight of citizens

and their activities,
stuck and even intensified."

We are living in a time where leadership
unfortunately is compromised.

And by that I mean,

that individuals are placed in power
for their ability to be influenced,

not their merits of leadership.

Nothing could be clearer

than the leadership of the
World Health Organization.

The World Health Organization is the
institution granted exclusive power

to guide and protect
the health and wellness of humanity.

The WHO is sustained
by private donations,

the bulk of which are made by
pharmaceutical and biotech corporations,

who have a vested financial interest
in organization support.

In 2017, the Associated Press
reported that the WHO

routinely spends about 200 million
a year on travel expenses.

More than what it spends to fight some
of the biggest problems in public health,

including AIDS, Tuberculosis
and Malaria combine.

The WHO's repeated issuing
of inaccurate and bad advice

is not merely
the result of incompetence,

but rather the direct result
of the Communist Party of China,

deliberately buying out
WHO's leadership.

On the nomination
of the executive board,

appoints Dr. Tedros Adenom Gabrieles

as director general of
the World Health Organization.

Tedros Gabrieles is the World Health
Organization's first director general

that isn't a medical doctor.

The appointment to the organization's
highest position was controversial,

given that in his previous role
as Ethiopian's health minister

Tedros was accused of covering up
three major health epidemics.

Tedros is no stranger to controversy.

As a former minister of health
in Ethiopia

he has been accused of
an alleged cover-up

of three possible Cholera epidemics.

Prior to his appointment,

Tedros was a high-ranking member of the
Tigray People's Liberation Front.

A brutal and corrupt political group

responsible for
crimes against humanity,

including bombings, kidnappings,
tortures and killings.

How does a man
with such a controversial past

score the top position at the world's
most influential health organization?

I have known Bill and Melinda
for many many years now.

While serving as
Ethiopia's health minister,

Tedros became intimately intertwined
with both the Gates Foundation

and the Clinton Foundation.

The health minister of Ethiopia

one of the ableist public servants
I ever worked with.

With the backing of the two
most powerful foundations on earth,

and the full support of
the Communist Party of China,

Tedros was a shoo-in.

We will have many body bags
in front of us,

if we don't behave.

You cannot find a person
promoting this scenario,

that's not part of the
interlocking directorates

of the World Health Organization,

the CDC,
the NIAID,

or the organizations that are
the philanthropic cover organizations

that fund them.

We now know
that there are over 1,300 patents

currently issued
and held by organizations

that are
multiply recipients of funding

through the Gates Foundation,
through EcoHealth Alliance,

through the Sherlock Biosciences
connection back into Open Philanthropy,

and all of them also have links directly
to NIAID Anthony Fauci's funding sources.

If you have conflicts of interest in
the funding and in the decision making

and in the
inside knowledge that you have,

between competing
or competitor organizations,

that is a violation of the
antitrust laws of the United States.

These are federal crimes.

If you have the power to...

immediately fix whatever's wrong
with our current medical system,

where would you start?

Conflicts of interest.

About 40 or 50 years ago,
pharmaceutical CEOs actually went to jail

if they knowingly sold a bad product

and concealed information about
the problems with that product.

Since then,
all they have done is paid fines.

And so, selling a product and
concealing information about it is okay,

because paying the fine is considered
the cost of doing business.

How did the pharmaceutical industry
come to capture

the rest of the medical industry?

And it's because
they had so much money...

to bribe the NIH,
the CDC, the FDA,

the professional associations,
you know, the journals,

the medical schools and everyone else.

Around the same time taht
John D. Rockefeller seized U.S media,

he also hijacked U.S medicine.

When it was discovered that drugs
could be produced from petroleum,

America's top oil mogul
ordered his army of propagandist

to invert reality accordingly.

Medicines used for thousands of years
were suddenly classified as alternative.

While the new petroleum-based
highly addictive and patentable drugs

were declared the gold standard.

After buying the
German pharmaceutical company

that manufactured chemicals of war
for Adolf Hitler

Rockefeller leveraged
his political influence

by pressing congress to declare
natural healing modalities

"unscientific quackery."

Rockefeller then took control of the
American Medical Association

and began offering massive grants
to top medical schools

under the mandate that only
his approved curriculum be taught.

Any mention of the healing powers
of herbs, plants and diet

was erased from
most medical textbooks.

Doctors and professors
who objected to Rockefeller's plan

were crucified by the media,
removed from the AMA,

and stripped of their license
to teach and practice medicine.

Those who dared to speak out
were arrested and jailed.

When evidence began to emerge

that petroleum-based medicines
were causing cancer,

Mr. Rockefeller founded
the American Cancer Society

through which he suppressed
that information.

John D. Rockefeller is duly credited

as the founder of the
pharmaceutical industry,

and the reason that medical error

is currently the third leading cause
of death in America.

This is not an indictment
against doctors.

More than anyone,
they are under the stranglehold

of the single largest
lobbying power in Washington.

Every year the pharmaceutical industry

spends at least
twice the amount as Big Oil,

to influence laws, policies
and public perception.

Thanks to Mr. Rockefeller,
the architect of American monopolies,

no industry has more power
over our lives than Big Pharma.

Part of the problem,

and this, by the way,
goes back to the 1980s with Microsoft,

is Bill Gates found out
that it was very difficult

to manufacture a way to navigate
through the patent universe,

saying that it's Microsoft
holding the patents.

And he became the architect
of a very cunning program

of putting patents
in holding companies

that didn't have anything to do
with the named of the organization.

According to legend,

young Bill Gates built his
computer empire out of his garage.

reality tells another story;

That Bill Gates was born
into wealth and privilege.

Both his grandfather and great-grandfather
were banking muggles.

His father,
William Gates Senior,

was a prominent Seattle-based
lawyer and political lobbyist.

Through his father,

Bill Gates learned the ins and outs
of law and politics,

and how to manipulate
those governing forces.

I'm Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft.

Bill Gates dropped out of college
to start Microsoft.

He is credited with inventing the
operating system that became Windows.

However, he played no part
in the invention of Windows.

The fact is,

he bought an existing operating system
from Seattle computer products,

had it modified,
then licensed it to IBM.

That didn't stop him
from taking all the credit.

I don't see Bill Gates
as this great creative person.

I see him as an opportunist.

While Microsoft's co-founder Paul Allen
was struggling with cancer,

Bill Gates seized the opportunity,

by attempting to cheat him out
of his share of the company's fortune.

They're basically talking about
how they were...

planning to dilute my share
down to almost nothing.

And it was a really shocking
and disheartening moment for me.

You were sick.

I think I was still probably
in the middle of radiation therapy.

Gates' business strategies
came under fire in 1998,

when the United States
Department Of Justice

sued Microsoft
for antitrust violations.

During the 18-month trial,
Gates gave hours of videotape testimony.

What were the non-Microsoft browsers

that you were concerned about
in January of 1996?

- That month?
- Yes, sir.

And what about it?

What non-Microsoft browsers
were you concerned about

in January of 1996?

I don't know
what you mean 'concerned.'

um

What is it about the word 'concerned'
that you don't understand?

I'm not sure what you mean by it.

The Justice Department
has charged Microsoft

with engaging in anti-competitive
and exclusionary practices,

designed to maintain its monopoly
in Personal Computer operating systems.

In a move to overshadow
the negative press,

Gates invested 100 million dollars

to set up the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Overnight, Bill Gates
transformed his public image.

From ruthless tech monopolizer,

to the world's
most generous philanthropist.

I'm pleased to announce that we're
pledging an additional billion dollars...

We had the chance
to witness Bill Gates 2.0,

the man you don't know.

The rebranding campaign paid off.

His net worth swiftly doubled,

earning Bill Gates the title of
"Richest man in the world."

You've invested 10 billion dollars
in vaccinations

over the last two decades,

and you figured out the return
on investment for that.

It kind of stunned me.
Can you walk us through the math?

In a Wall Street essay,

Bill Gates declared vaccines
"The best investment I've ever made."

There's been over a 20 to 1 return,

so if you just look at the
economic benefits

that's a pretty strong number
compared to anything else.

The Gates Foundation
expanded rapidly,

into a massive vertically integrated
multinational corporation.

Controlling every step,

and a supply chain that reaches
from its Seattle-based boardrooms

to the villages of Africa and Asia.

Is the world's largest private
philanthropy causing harm?

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
has made millions of dollars each year

from companies blame for many
of the same social and health problems

the foundation seeks to address.

The Gates Foundation has investments

in 69 of the worst polluting companies
in the U.S and Canada.

Other companies
in the foundation's portfolio

have been accused of transgressions

including forcing thousands of people
to lose their homes,

supporting child labor,
defrauding,

and neglecting patients
in need of medical care.

The Gates Foundation
has not provided details...

William H. Gates III
and Melinda French Gates.

As a top donor to both
the WHO and the CDC,

no one man has more power
than Bill Gates

to influence and control the health
and medical freedom of all people.

Normalcy only returns

when we've largely vaccinated
the entire global population.

This will be the new normal,
until a vaccine is developed.

Until we find a vaccine,

going back to normal
means putting lives at risk.

We need to produce it,

and to deploy it
in every single corner of the world.

Full vaccination of our children
and pregnant women.

Development of new
vaccines therapeutics...

We've already bought the stringes.

We already know
where it's going to happen.

We're thinking about
what that's going to be.

It's all part of this plan.

Our military is now being mobilized,

so at the end of the year
we're going to be able

to give it to a lot of people
very very rapidly.

In 1986,

president Ronald Reagan signed the
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,

granting total immunity
to vaccine manufacturers.

After a decade of lawsuits
related to vaccine injuries and deaths,

vaccine makers were going bankrupt.

In a move to coerce policymakers,

vaccine companies
threatened to stop making vaccines

until they could be
legally shielded from liability.

To this day,

when someone is injured or killed
as the result of an adverse reaction,

it is the U.S taxpayers
that pay for the damages.

Welcome back.

Were several Indian tribal girls
used as guinea pigs?

The report alleges that
two American pharma giants

untested vaccine was administered
to thousands of tribal girls

without proper study and paperwork.

India was among the hardest hit

after Bollywood celebrities were
incentivized by the Gates Foundation

to urge the public to submit
to mass vaccinations.

In 2009, tribal children were
administered the HPV vaccine.

Over 24,000 girls were told
they were being given wellness shots.

In many cases, without the informed
consent of a parent or guardian.

The people that were
administering these vaccines

lied to the guardians of these girls,

and told the girls,

"oh This is going to cure cancer.
You're never going to have cancer."

And these girls
became severely injured.

Some of them developed seizures.
Some of them developed cancer.

And seven girls died,

and there was no insurance.
There was no assistance for them.

And the Gates Foundation denied
that it had been clinical trials.

And it was so bad that the parliament
in India created a task force.

They studied it,
and they kicked out the Gates Foundation.

But India is a barbaric country.

Things happen here
in a very barbaric way.

But I was surprised to find
an American organization

operating in broad daylight,

doing things in a very very...
let's say "Indian fashion."

And so the route I took was that I want
the whole procedure to be investigated.

The Indian parliament
formed a committee.

And it was to me
a rather surprising move,

because you generally don't often have
such a high level inquiry

into matters affecting poor people.

And that was such
an extraordinary report.

I don't think Indian parliament has ever
come out with such a scaling report.

And the government officials
came up and said,

"We shouldn't have authorized this.

We're sorry.
We're not going to allow them again."

And now they're back,
doing their same old tricks again.

The good news is that human clinical
trials can start as early as july 2020

for India's first COVID-19.

Indigenous vaccine that's been developed
by Bharat biotech...

So you can imagine how the manipulation
of the media by the media.

The manipulation of public opinion
by leaders from all political parties,

unanimously saying,
"we want a vaccine."

And the worst thing is
they are taken as philanthropists.

Whereas what this actually is,

is the acquisition
of political and financial power.

And I think
the second most populous country,

with 1.3 billion people,

is going to be a good base

for pharmaceutical companies
to make a killing,

and also kill a lot of people
in the process.

Yes, I just find it a pity
that we haven't been able to...

get any benefit for the girls
who suffered, you know.

It's so terrifying as to what
they're actually doing with the world.

We're taking things that are...
you know...

genetically modified organisms,

and we're injecting them
in little kids' arms.

We just shoot them
right into the vein.

In 2018,
scientific study released in the

International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health

concluded that
over 490,000 children in India

developed paralysis as a result of a
Gates supported oral Polio vaccine

that was administered
between the years of 2000 and 2017.

Using all the usual sleight of hand,

U.S-based media and fact-checkers
rushed to bury the story.

But thanks to the meticulous work of
a team of Indian researchers and doctors

the inconvenient truth lives
on the nih.gov website.

It's my honor to introduce
Bill and Melinda Gates.

[Applause]

[Music]

Without any medical training,

Bill and Melinda Gates founded The Global
Alliance For Vaccines And Immunization,

through which they fulfill their agenda
to vaccinate the world.

The foundation has been sued

by the governments of some of the
poorest and most vulnerable nations,

for causing serious harm
through experimental vaccine programs.

If you just look at healthcare workers
around the world,

they deserve to get the vaccine first.

You know,
here in the United States,

really it's going to be black people
who really should get it first

and many indigenous people.

Vaccines were always taught to us
that it was safe.

It was-it was healthy.
This is things that we had to do.

But given the position that I am in now
as a State Legislator,

and looking at these studies
and reviewing a lot of these studies,

its very scary,

and I want the African-American community
to open up their eyes.

Of all the places that Mr. Gates
could have gone in the world

why did he settle on Africa?

It's not because he cares about people
that look like me.

He cares about an agenda.

African bodies have been used as lab rats
for many years for Big Pharma.

They are using us for trials.
They are using us for testing.

But as an African I say "no more."

Africans, they're tired of becoming
the guinea pigs of the world.

Their antennas are raised

and they are telling each other
all over social media,

they're on high alert right now.

There is a policy
of the American government,

it's called "The Kissinger Report"
which was produced in the mid 70s.

And it explicitly states that the purpose
of the foreign policy in Africa

was to reduce the population.

Because they have
a great mineral resources there,

and that time Kissinger and those
involved with the Carter administration

wanted to shrink the population.

make sure that the Africans
do not develop,

and do not use the resources
for themselves,

because we in the U.S,
we need them.

There is a concerted effort
of foreign powers

to control the population of Africa.

Some children did survive
the botched vaccinations last month

and will recover,

but 15,
all under the age of 5,

died from fever, vomiting
and diarrhea.

Human errors contributed to the
unfortunate deaths of the children.

How can you believe Big Pharma
but not believe these parents

when they tell you that their children
have been injured by Big Pharma?

I don't care how big
this corporate machine looks.

As a parent,
I can tell you,

these people will never
stop fighting for their kids.

[Music]

It would take hours to list
all of the questionable initiatives

that Bill Gates is involved in.

Here's a few of the highlights:

Gates is one of the key funders in the

Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation
experiment,

designed to block out the sun
in an effort to control global warming,

by releasing massive amounts of
calcium carbonate and other materials

into the upper atmosphere.

critics,
including environmental scientists,

have called the project
"A global genocide experiment."

Gates has invested
over 1 billion dollars

in Earth Now's,
global surveillance project.

The project will launch
hundreds of satellites into space

which will allow for the 24\7 monitoring
of all people everywhere.

In partnership with MIT,

Bill Gates has developed
a new technology,

that allows vaccines
to be injected under your skin

along with your medical records.

The quantum dot tattoo
will implant an invisible certificate

that can be scanned by authorities

using a cell phone app
and infrared light.

Eventually, what we'll have to have
is certificates of...

who's a recovered person.
who's a vaccinated person.

So eventually there will be this
digital immunity proof.

The EPA recently approved
an experimental use permit to Oxitec,

a biotech company funded by the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

in an effort to fight malaria,

Oxitec will soon release millions of
genetically modified mosquitoes,

in various U.S states.

According to the NIH website,
programs are being developed

to allow human immunization
via mosquito bite.

It was Science magazine that
coined the phrase "flying syringes."

A shocking new report
from the New York Times

sheds light on the connection
between Microsoft founder Bill Gates

and the late Jeffrey Epstein.

You report these two men
met at least six times.

Well I believe that there were more.

This included visits to the mansion,

seeing each other in Seattle,
flying on Epstein's plane.

When flight logs revealed that Gates had
been a passenger on the Lolita Express,

he claimed that he didn't know
that the private jet belonged to Epstein.

He also denied that he and Mr. Epstein
were involved in any business deals.

However, an expose by
the New York Times revealed

that not only did Bill Gates initiate
a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein

well after
he was convicted of sex crimes,

but the two were also
involved in the process

of co-founding a multi-billion dollar
charitable fund.

Why would they ever
set up a charitable trust

benefiting Jeffrey Epstein?

That it was all about philanthropy.

That Bill Gates just wanted to find
new sources of money.

Why would one of the
richest men in the world

choose to partner with the
world's most notorious pedophile?

A deeper dive into Epstein's world

revealed that the two men had
more in common than meets the eye.

Like Gates,

Epstein was a billionaire philanthropist
with a passion for science,

health, education and children.

The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation donated
millions of dollars to top universities,

science institutes,
medical schools,

early education programs,
youth initiatives,

and international peace accords.

Bill Gates is either
the most misunderstood man alive,

or one of the most
convincing con men to ever live.

Is he a benevolent hero
or a malevolent opportunist?

Bill Gates.

Personally, I would love to believe that
one of the richest men in the world

is giving away his fortune
for the betterment of humanity.

I want to believe
that endearing smile.

I want to believe that his heart
is as soft and warm as his sweaters.

At the very least,

I want to believe that he's unaware
of the damage he's done.

I'm happy to announce
that we've discovered a vaccine.

We no longer have to live in fear.

Everyone can get back
to their normal lives.

[Music]

It's the great hope
galvanizing the world,

a vaccine for COVID-19.

But are we being sold alive?

After all, COVID-19 is the
seventh Coronavirus to strike mankind,

and we've never found a vaccine
for any of them.

The shortest time
anybody's ever found a vaccine

against any disease that
I'm familiar with is about 7 years.

The average time is 20.

To be talking about a magic bullet
coming in months

it borders on the absurd.

People like myself and Tony Fauci
are saying 18 months.

A year to a year and a half.

If everything went perfectly,
we could do slightly better than that,

but there will be a trade-off.

We'll have less safety testing
than we typically would have.

And so governments
will have to decide

you know, do they indemnify
the companies and really say,

"Let's-let's go out with this."

Something that people should know
about COVID-19 vaccines

is they fall today
under the Prep Act,

which came into being after 9\11
and after an anthrax scare.

And this law gives virtually
blanket liability protection.

It's basically impossible to get any kind
of compensation if you're injured.

So people need to understand that
if you take COVID-19 vaccines,

you are absolutely on your own.

If you're permanently injured,
if you lose your job,

if your health care expenses
go through the roof,

tough luck.

Volunteers all across the country

began getting shots today
as part of the final phase of testing

for an experimental vaccine
being developed by the NIH

and the drug company Moderna.

The side effects for the
Moderna vaccine sound concerning.

We looked.

After the second dose
at least 80% of participants

experienced a systemic side effect.

So, are these vaccines safe?

Well the... uh

The FDA, not being pressured,
will look hard at that.

The FDA is the
gold standard of regulators.

And their current guidance on this...

if they stick with that
is-is very very appropriate.

And...
You know, they...it...

The-the-the side effects
were not super severe.

That is, it didn't cause
permanent health problems for...

The things that are...
they...

You know, Moderna did have to go
with the fairly high dose, and so...

you know,
to get the antibodies.

This isn't a vaccine story.
This is a population management story.

If your goal is to make
this beautiful earth that we live on

an exclusive playground
for the entitled few,

then populations that get in the way
are a problem.

And it is the empirical impulses
of individuals who have decided

that by outranking
the rest of humanity

they can dictate upon humanity
the conditions of their existence.

Now we need to go
and look in families to find

those people who may be sick,
and remove them and isolate them.

This bill enables the police
to enter a home without a warrant.

Madam Speaker,
the police have never held that power.

We will find out
who lives in the house.

And if it's someone that is refusing

we will definitely
consult with our health officer

to look into the next steps.

So the sheriff's department
and the health department

showed up at her door,

with orders for her and her husband
to wear ankle monitors.

The couple says they never denied
self-quarantining.

You will no longer be able
to leave home.

Only one person will be able
to go shopping, once per day.

Recreational activity is now
no longer allowed.

You will be allowed to have
one hour of exercise,

no further than 5 kilometers
from your home.

Are you serious?
Just for not having a mask?

We will shut you down.
We will cite you.

And if we need to,
we will arrest you,

and we will take you to jail!

You know the old expression
about snitches?

Well in this case,
snitches get rewards.

Some people are
ratting their neighbors out,

calling the police.

But others are
turning to the internet,

where social distance shaming
has gotten ugly.

In a time of crisis,

trying to force compliance
upon a population

by making neighbors and friends
distrust one another,

is exactly the opposite tactic
we actually need.

When human societies
lose their freedom,

it's not usually because
tyrants have taken it away.

It's usually because people
willingly surrender their freedom

in return for protection
against some external threat.

That's what I fear we are seeing now.

This is a cognitive dissonant moment,

which is being
imprinted in your brain.

Just like
"Remember the great depression."

"Remember 9\11."

Weapons of mass destruction.

We are being conditioned
to have the excuse

for unbelievable acts of tyranny,

which will be justified by
"Remember 2020."

And your loved ones;

Those that die,
those that are infected,

they're being used as cannon fodder.

which is the ultimate desecration
of their honor and integrity.

And this is also a test of humanity.

To see how much of our liberty
we will let go,

before we finally
draw the line under enough.

Benjamin Rush. A sign of the declaration
of independence stated

unless we put medical freedom
into the constitution

the time will come

when medicine will organize
into an undercover dictatorship

to restrict the art of healing
to one class of men,

and deny equal privileges to others.
That time is now.

Well this won't be
the last pandemic that we face.

So we...

You know,
we'll have to prepare for the next one.

That...
You know, I'd say is...

will get attention this time.

[Music]

This is not a time for us
to go in a mob frenzy,

find the perpetrators and haul them
into the town square and hillary them.

This is a moment for us to recognize

that every decision
that is being made today,

by any of the conspiring parties,
made perfect sense...

in each increment,

when each one
of those decisions was made.

The sum of those incremental steps
has led to devastation

because they lost touch
with their fellow humanity.

But that's an invitation for each
one of us to examine how we're living.

And how not
a single decision we make,

not one,
in any moment,

is without consequence.

This is our moment
to reclaim our humanity.

[Music]

Our lives are shaped
and guided by stories.

The stories we're told
become the stories we tell.

The more we hear them,

the more we believe them.

When used as a tool,
they help us to better understand...

who we are,
where we came from,

and where we're going.

When used as a weapon,

they can be deadly.

One of the most dangerous stories
we've been told

is the one
that goes something like this:

Humanity is a failed experiment.

We are parasites,

a cancer,

- a virus.
- a virus.

Human beings are a disease.

It is a myth
that permeates our movies,

our music,

our media,

and our minds.

As they say,

"Repeat a lie often enough,
it becomes truth."

Perhaps that was the goal
of the authors of that story.

um We feel too afraid to have kids

um because we feel that we're heading
towards civilization breakdown.

Fear shuts down the part of our brain
designed to solve problems.

Without that ability,
we look for others to guide and save us.

In doing so,

we lose touch
with our most primal nature.

We forget that we are an extension

of the most brilliant and resilient
ecosystem in the universe.

We stopped eating food
grown from the earth,

and began consuming products
processed from machines.

We trade medicines that heal

for drugs that harm.

We abandon love and liberty

for debt and dependency.

The good news is...

our story is not over.

The climax has yet to come.

That moment when the hero
rises from defeat,

summoning a force
they forgot they had.

A force within.

A force of nature.

You people are the real thing.

This nation will rise up.

A new generation of Americans.

It's time to think
about the future generations.

Subtitles by Shay Avrahami