Original subtitles

Narrator : It was 1962, the height of the Cold War,

a moment when unrelenting anxiety about the future

was leavened by an abiding faith in the power of science

to secure our safety and prosperity.

Then came an incendiary book that sowed seeds of doubt.

MAN (on film) : This is one of the nation's best sellers,

first printed on September 27, 1962.

Up to now, 500,000 copies have been sold,

and Silent Spring has been called

the most controversial book of the year.

Narrator : At the eye of the storm was Rachel Carson,

one of the most celebrated American writers of her time.

With her first three books,

a lyrical trilogy about the sea,

Carson had opened people's eyes to the natural world.

Now, in Silent Spring, she delivered the dark warning

that they might soon destroy it.

CARSON : If we are ever to solve the basic problem

of environmental contamination,

we must begin to count the many hidden costs

of what we are doing.

MAN (on film) : Miss Carson maintains that the balance of nature

is a major force in the survival of man.

Whereas the modern chemist, the modern biologist,

the modern scientist believes

that man is steadily controlling nature.

MAN : It was sort of the gospel at the time

that human ingenuity would triumph over nature.

What Carson was arguing was for caution.

She really confronted the orthodoxies of her time.

WOMAN : She was accused of being a Communist,

of being a hysterical, female Luddite.

The reaction was to attack the messenger.

Narrator : Carson was an unlikely heretic.

Dutiful, demure, and so jealous of her solitude

that her most intimate relationship

was conducted mainly through letters.

She'd thrust herself into the public eye,

all the while harboring a secret that was literally killing her.

To some, Silent Spring was an act of heroism;

to others, an irresponsible breach

of scientific objectivity.

But there could be no dispute

that with her rebuke to modern technological science,

Carson had shattered a paradigm.

MAN : Rachel Carson not only changed

the kind of questions we ask about the environment,

I think she caused us to start to ask those questions.

She's the instigator.

(guns booming)

Narrator : In mid-July 1945,

as the Second World War ground on in the Pacific

and weary Americans scanned the morning's headlines

for the word "victory,"

Rachel Carson was trying to call attention

to what she believed was a war against the Earth.

Carson was 38 that summer, and restless.

A writer by inclination and a biologist by training,

she'd spent much of the previous decade

in the employ of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,

overseeing publications about its conservation work.

The job paid the bills, but Carson craved a wider audience.

Now, the agency had undertaken a study

she felt warranted public attention.

As she put it in a letter to the popular monthly Reader's Digest :

"Practically at my back door in Maryland,

an experiment of more than ordinary interest and importance

is going on."

On a vast, forested tract at the Patuxent Research Refuge,

not far from Carson's home in Silver Spring,

Fish and Wildlife scientists had begun to examine

the environmental impacts

of a relatively new chemistry lab creation:

a so-called synthetic pesticide known as DDT.

WILLIAM SOUDER : Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, DDT.

It was first synthesized back in the 19th century

and it sat on lab shelves for decades.

Nobody knew if it did anything, if it had any useful purpose,

until 1939, when a Swiss chemist named Paul Muüller

discovered that it was a very potent insecticide

and killed all kinds of bugs very readily.

Film Narrator : Absorbed through the feet or other parts of the body,

DDT affects the nervous system and motor coordination

of the insect.

Several hours elapse before symptoms develop.

Then in sequence follow restlessness, tremors,

convulsions, paralysis, and death.

DEBORAH BLUM : Farmers have been doing war with insects and other pests

for a long time,

and they had been using what we think of now

as almost obviously homicidal poisons

to do that.

But for the first time,

we have a sort of new-generation pesticide.

It's a whole new fascinating kind of chemical formula

that's not obviously toxic to people,

and insects are dying all over the place.

Narrator : After the bombing of Pearl Harbor,

the U.S. military had rushed DDT to the battle zones

in an effort to protect American troops

from insect-borne diseases such as typhus,

which was spread by lice and, left untreated, could kill.

Film Narrator : This was Naples, Italy, shortly after the Allied occupation.

Its crowded population lacked almost everything

for the safeguarding of public health:

the perfect set-up for epidemic.

DAVID KINKELA : Naples is really a city under siege.

And typhus spreads quickly under those kinds of conditions.

So they set up spray stations in the cities,

spraying thousands of people a day with hand sprayers,

people who wanted to get sprayed,

people who didn't want to get sprayed,

children, elderly.

Film Narrator : Next, the 40,000 Italians

dwelling in the jam-packed air raid shelters

were deloused.

Narrator : In all, more than a million people were dusted with DDT,

and the epidemic was stopped in its tracks.

Neapolitans, The New York Times reported,

are now throwing DDT at brides instead of rice.

Meanwhile, in the tropical Pacific theater,

where more soldiers had been sidelined by malaria

than by gunshot wounds,

entire islands were saturated with DDT.

MARK LYTLE : General Douglas MacArthur once said

that in war, an army commander had three divisions,

one in the front fighting, one in reserve,

and one in the rear being refitted.

He said, "I have one in the front, one in reserve,

and one in the hospital," because of malaria.

But with DDT, that problem diminished substantially.

It was considered to be a miracle substance,

in that it saved hundreds of thousands of lives.

Narrator : By the middle of 1944,

TIME magazine had pronounced DDT

"one of the great scientific discoveries of World War II."

To Reader's Digest,

Rachel Carson was offering a new angle:

a piece exploring DDT's potential

to cause collateral damage to wildlife.

NAOMI ORESKES : Biologists for the Fish and Wildlife Service

begin to see pretty quickly

that when DDT is used in certain areas,

there's evidence of problems.

There's evidence of fish kill or bird kill,

and they see that,

and like any expert, they publish it in a place

where other experts will read it.

But how that information

then filters out to a larger public

is a very big question.

SOUDER : Carson understood the implications of this.

She wanted to write a story warning people

that, "We need to be a little bit careful with this.

This looks like it's a great thing,

but we maybe need to be cautious in how we use it,

how much of it we use."

LINDA LEAR : But Reader's Digest doesn't want this article.

They essentially say,

"Oh, housewives would be just turned off by this.

"They wouldn't want to know about this terrible stuff,

so no-- no, thank you."

(crowd cheering)

Film Narrator : The victory-flash-electrified Times Square

keyed to the bursting point,

as the magic word of complete surrender came through.

Narrator : Just weeks later, the war in the Pacific finally was won,

and credit for the victory went

to the twin weapons of modern science:

the atomic bomb and the so-called insect bomb, DDT.

LYTLE : America's actually healthier

and the death rate went down during World War II,

even if you include soldiers in the equation.

And so people considered this

a real triumph of human ingenuity

over the old pestilences of nature

that had made life nasty, brutish, and short.

BLUM : So people just went, "Wow.

"We have this incredibly potent compound,

"doesn't cause any harm to anything but bugs.

We'll just use it everywhere."

MAN (on film) : I consider this amazing chemical

MAN (on film) : the most valuable contribution

of our wartime medical research program

to the future health and welfare

not only of this nation, but of the entire world.

Narrator : Carson's misgivings about DDT were not assuaged.

But she was in no position to spend time

on a story she couldn't sell.

LEAR : She really is pretty certain

that synthetic pesticides are not good for the environment,

and that they have a power to destroy,

which is not being made clear to anybody.

But Reader's Digest doesn't think so.

So she gives it up.

She puts it away.

But it really doesn't go away.

CARSON (dramatized) : I can remember no time, even in earliest childhood,

when I didn't assume I was going to be a writer.

Also, I can remember no time

when I wasn't interested in the out-of-doors

and the whole world of nature.

Those interests, I know,

I inherited from my mother and have always shared with her.

Narrator : She was, from the very beginning, her mother's child.

A former schoolteacher of stern Presbyterian stock,

Maria Carson had given up her career

for marriage and motherhood,

only to find herself alone among strangers.

Her husband, Robert, while well-meaning,

had never managed to provide more than a meager existence.

The family's clapboard house,

on the Allegheny River just north of Pittsburgh,

lacked both central heating and running water

throughout the 29 years the Carsons occupied it.

Maria's two older children already were school-aged

when their younger sister was born,

and already showed a marked lack of interest

in their mother's passions.

Rachel would be different.

SOUDER : Maria Carson was an educated woman

and a woman who enjoyed reading.

She enjoyed music.

She was a person who, to some degree,

lived a life of the mind.

ROBERT MUSIL : She focused and passed this all on to Rachel.

She was ambitious for her daughter.

This was her youngest, brightest,

frankly, favorite child,

and so she wanted her to get a good education.

Narrator : Inspired by a popular educational movement

which held that children should "study nature, not books,"

Maria made the surrounding woods and fields

Rachel's first classroom.

Learn to love the natural world, the theory went,

and one will wish to protect it.

LYTLE : Rachel and her mother

would spend their afternoons together exploring.

She learned to identify wild things

and the songs of birds,

and she could recognize the nests, and the flora and fauna.

Her mother taught her to be rigorous in her observation,

but it also, of course,

deepened her relationship with her mother.

Narrator : She was the solitary sort of girl

who greeted the birds on the way to school in the morning

and was partial to the companionship of books.

At the age of eight, she was writing stories of her own.

At ten, at her mother's urging, Rachel entered a contest

sponsored by the popular children's magazine St. Nicholas

and became a published author.

By 14, she was submitting her work to magazines for sale.

MUSIL : If we picture a girl in a small farm

in Nowhere, Pennsylvania,

who is transported through literature

and can imagine being elsewhere,

I think she was led to see that as something that she could do,

and it was constantly reinforced.

LEAR : Maria Carson had always wanted to go to college and couldn't,

so she was going to be quite sure that this daughter,

this smart daughter, was going to go to college.

Narrator : When Rachel won a scholarship to Pennsylvania College for Women,

Maria sold off even the family china

to help cover her daughter's expenses,

then made the 30-mile round trip to Pittsburgh most weekends

to visit her.

SOUDER : She was the star pupil.

Everyone realized right away what a talented writer she was

and also saw that this was her ambition in life,

that she wanted to be a writer.

So it came as a great shock when she fell in love with biology.

The science of life just struck a chord in her

that I think she didn't realize was there.

Narrator : Thrilled by the prospect of understanding the natural world

she'd been taught to so closely observe,

Carson changed her major from English to biology

and announced her intention to go on to graduate school.

She spent the next two years

taking courses in zoology, physiology, anatomy.

But her true interest

only revealed itself after graduation,

when she landed a coveted research spot

at the Marine Biology Laboratory in Woods Hole, Massachusetts,

and for the first time in her life

laid eyes on the ocean.

LEAR : She's moved beyond just the ordinary person would be moved

who would have seen the ocean for the first time.

The sea taught her everything

that she later came to want to understand

and want the world to understand,

that everything was connected to everything else.

SOUDER : If you study biology

and if you look at how all life on Earth has evolved,

eventually you begin to see everything in totality.

You can't divorce yourself or any other living thing

from the environment that we all share.

And Carson was fascinated by that.

LYTLE : It was one of the most liberating,

expansive experiences she ever had in her life.

One of her overriding lessons was that the sea,

with all of its massive expanse and its varieties of creatures,

was beyond the controlling hand of man.

Narrator : Had it not been for the Depression

and her family's dire financial straits,

Carson might have become a marine biologist.

As it was,

she'd barely started her graduate work at Johns Hopkins

before her parents, her older sister, and her two nieces

came to live with her in Baltimore.

Full-time study gave way to part-time study

and part-time work.

Then, when Carson was 28, her father died suddenly.

Not long after, her sister died, as well,

leaving two daughters in Rachel and her mother's care.

Now the family's sole breadwinner,

Carson left Johns Hopkins with her master's degree

and took a job with the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries,

writing an assortment of publications

about the bureau's marine conservation work.

SOUDER : As she's looking over the press releases she's writing,

she realizes that some of these subjects

are kind of interesting

and could be turned into feature stories

for a local newspaper.

So she starts selling stories to The Baltimore Sun

that are based on some of the work

that she's seeing being done at the Bureau of Fisheries.

Narrator : From time to time,

Carson omitted her first name from her signature,

believing certain pieces would have more credibility

if they were presumed to have been written by a man.

Still, as she later said, "It was a turning point.

"I had given up writing forever, I thought.

It never occurred to me

that I was merely getting something to write about."

SOUDER : She has at last found this way

to combine her two passions in life.

Biology and writing merge,

and I think really from that time forward,

she never thinks of them as being separate things.

What she is is someone who writes about science.

Narrator : In 1937, a piece Carson published in The Atlantic

came to the attention of Simon & Schuster,

which offered her a small advance

for a book about the sea.

Hopeful the opportunity would help her

make the leap to full-time writer,

she poured three years' worth of nights and weekends

into the book,

a kind of literary triptych

about the lives of three sea creatures.

Under the Sea-Wind earned early critical praise,

but the rush to the bookstore Carson had dreamed of

never happened.

(bombs streaking and exploding)

SOUDER : A few weeks after the book is released,

the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor,

and everybody's attention shifts from books,

certainly from slight books,

like a book about creatures that live in the ocean.

And Under The Sea-Wind went just kind of vanishes without a trace,

never sells even 2,000 copies.

Narrator : For Carson, there would be no escape from her day job.

The Bureau of Fisheries by then had merged with another agency

to become the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,

but Carson's position was essentially unchanged.

And though she excelled in it, it was not work that she loved.

By the time the war came to an end, in 1945,

she was back to pitching feature stories

and frustrated beyond measure.

What she was, as a friend put it,

was a "would-be writer

was a "would-be writer

who could not afford the time for creative work."

LEAR : I don't think Rachel sees that there's much alternative.

She's got a good job, she's got family to support.

So she's really stuck.

She felt she'd come to an obstacle

that didn't have any easy way around.

Really for the first time in her life,

I think she really didn't see the way forward.

And, I think, she was in the "now what?" phase for several years.

ANNOUNCER : Headlines in Chemistry.

ANNOUNCER 2 : And here is our first headline.

Science can now rid the country of mosquitoes.

ANNOUNCER 3 : The mosquito is doomed!

And so is the tiny bloodthirsty black fly.

These biting insects can now be completely wiped out

by man-made fogs loaded with DDT.

Narrator : Not long after Reader's Digest declined Carson's DDT piece,

the "miracle pesticide" was released for civilian use.

For the first time, the insect-borne scourges

that spread disease and ravaged crops

seemed subject to man's control.

LYTLE : Most people were inclined to think of humans

as the superior, apex species,

and that the rest of the animal, plant kingdom

existed for our convenience,

and that man's function was to dominate

and, in a sense, bend nature to his purposes.

And so the ethos of science and technology

is that humans could improve on nature.

SOUDER : DDT was going to end diseases like malaria and typhus.

It was going to greatly increase agricultural output.

DDT was thought to be so important

that Paul Muüller won the Nobel Prize for discovering DDT.

Narrator : Cheap and long-lasting, DDT was rushed into widespread use

practically overnight.

In the southeastern United States,

where malaria was rife,

a coalition of state and local health agencies

treated some 4 1/2 million homes with DDT.

By 1951, malaria had been eliminated

from the entire country.

(engine buzzing)

The U.S. Department of Agriculture,

meanwhile, promoted DDT to farmers

and, in conjunction with the military,

sold thousands of decommissioned planes as crop dusters,

boosting agricultural yields across the country.

SOUDER : It's hard to understand now

because it seems instinctive to us.

But the idea that a chemical

might present a hazard to your health

or to the well-being of the natural environment,

this was not front-of-mind for anybody at the time.

There was really no rigorous testing of these chemicals

to ensure their safety.

There was much greater attention paid

to whether they were effective.

BLUM : Nature was big, and dark, and scary, and dangerous

in profound ways through much of human history.

So when people looked at nature,

they saw that the world would be safer

if they could master it.

And when you get something that looks like a tool,

a "magic bullet,"

you want the magic bullet.

Narrator : Spurred by the success of DDT,

chemists soon created a host of new pesticidal compounds:

endrin, dieldrin, toxaphene.

Over the decade to come, all would be weapons

in the struggle to master nature.

KINKELA : So you see an explosion of American science

that has the potential to solve deep-seated problems

of famine and disease around the world.

And so there's this sense of a quest.

We have the tools, we have the technology,

we have the know-how, and this is our moment.

Narrator : On an overcast morning in July 1949,

Rachel Carson found herself

in a boat off the coast of Miami,

staring down into the storm-churned waters

of Biscayne Bay.

After five years spent making the best of her job

at the Fish and Wildlife Service,

she'd begun to toy with the idea

of writing another book about the sea,

and this time, she was determined

to experience her subject firsthand.

SOUDER : She probably didn't let on that she was a very poor swimmer.

She didn't like boats.

You know, she was happy being in up to about her knees,

and beyond that she really wasn't very comfortable.

But she felt that if she could somehow muster the courage

to go under the surface,

that it would be illuminating and helpful to her

in her writing.

Narrator : From her desk in Maryland,

it had seemed critical to her research

that she make this dive.

But now, on the boat,

the prospect of simply getting into the water

seemed impossibly daunting.

The diving helmet alone weighed 84 pounds.

Carson, at 5 feet, 4 inches tall, weighed all of 120.

Trembling, she managed to descend about eight feet,

to the bottom of the boat's ladder,

staying just long enough to note the presence of seaweed

and a few vibrantly colored fish.

She never once let go of the ladder's rung.

SOUDER : Her face mask kind of clouded up.

She was breathing heavily, she was terrified.

But she spent a few minutes there

and then climbed back up the ladder

and

and went home.

Narrator : Carson judged the dive a success,

because she'd at least been able

to glimpse the ocean's surface from below.

But as research, it was largely irrelevant:

the new book was to be based not on firsthand observation,

but rather on the surfeit of oceanographic studies

that lately had been piling up on her desk.

ORESKES : Up until World War II, nobody really worried much

about what happened below the waves.

But in World War II,

submarine warfare becomes important for the first time,

and the only way you can operate in the submarine environment

is with a very, very detailed understanding of the ocean.

And so we start learning a tremendous amount

about the ocean and about the life in the deep ocean

that had been quite mysterious before that.

And the idea that there was

all this amazing diverse life in the ocean

that we didn't really know about

and that is existing as a kind of parallel universe,

I think that that really captured her.

LEAR : Carson wanted to be the biographer of the ocean.

She wanted certainly to tell about its beauty

and about how intricate nature was.

It's the same question that she approached

in Under the Sea-Wind,

only now there was all this information

that she could tap.

She had access to confidential information.

She had access to war records.

She had access to submarine research.

She was a master synthesizer.

She could take information from this place and that place

and then see how it went together

in ways that I don't think very many people can do.

SOUDER : Carson's technique was to identify

the leading experts in the field,

ask a few harmless questions about their work,

and then once she got her foot in the door with them,

to expand the questioning

so that she could really pick their brains.

Narrator : In the evenings, after a full day at the office

and dinner with her mother,

Carson cloistered herself in her study

and worked on her book, sometimes until dawn.

DEBORAH CRAMER : Once you have all these hundreds and hundreds of papers,

you need to shape them in some kind of narrative,

and that requires a very different prose style

than what she was reading.

And so when you go about taking that material

and transforming it, but still being true to it,

it's just an extraordinarily difficult thing,

because when you choose different words to describe it,

you run the risk

of mistranslating what you're reading.

LEAR : It was a painstaking process because she was a perfectionist.

She had to get the first sentence right

before she could go to the second sentence.

And then she'd revise.

It takes a long time for her to get something that she likes,

and then in the morning, she's likely to revise it again,

so things go very slowly.

Narrator : Determined that this book would not languish

as Under the Sea-Wind had,

Carson signed on with a literary agent named Marie Rodell,

who sold the volume to Oxford Press

even before it had a title.

"Current suggestions

from irreverent friends and relatives," Carson joked,

"include Out of My Depth and Carson at Sea."

By the spring of 1950, the manuscript,

now bearing the title The Sea Around Us,

was nearly finished.

Hoping to foster advance interest in its publication,

Rodell began shopping excerpts to magazines.

15 turned the material down

before it finally made its way to William Shawn,

editor of The New Yorker,

who offered to publish ten of the book's chapters.

SOUDER : This is the turning point in Carson's career.

The New Yorker is a very prestigious,

widely read, widely respected magazine,

and so to be serialized in The New Yorker,

to have your work preview there

ahead of its publication as a book

is almost a guarantee of success.

Narrator : Carson would clear more from The New Yorker serialization

than she did from an entire year

at the Fish and Wildlife Service.

"I am still in a daze," she cabled Rodell.

"All I know is how lucky I am to have you."

By the time Carson's book went to print in the spring of 1951,

the world seemed to be cleaving in two.

The Soviet Union had shaken Americans' sense of security

with the successful test of an atomic bomb.

Communist forces had triumphed in China.

Now there was a pervasive feeling

that the struggle to stem the red tide

would be unremitting.

ANNOUNCER : From the White House in Washington, D.C.,

President Harry S. Truman.

TRUMAN : My fellow Americans,

I want to talk to you plainly tonight

about what we are doing in Korea

and about our policy in the Far East.

In the simplest terms, what we are doing in Korea

is this: we are trying to prevent a third world war.

Narrator : Against the backdrop of war, both hot and cold,

Carson worried that her second book

would founder like the first.

But thanks to The New Yorker serialization,

readers snapped it up all across the country

and found in its pages an antidote to anxiety.

READER : "The whole world ocean extends

over about three-fourths of the surface of the globe.

If we subtract the shallow areas of the continental shelves

and the scattered banks and shoals,

where at least the pale ghost of sunlight

moves over the underlying bottom,

there still remains about half the Earth

that is covered by miles-deep, lightless water,

that has been dark since the world began."

Narrator : Drawing upon all that was then known about the ocean,

Carson told the story of its life over the eons

and revealed a natural realm largely indifferent

to the rhythms of man.

SOUDER : It's a book that is jammed with news from the natural world.

It's about currents, about the propagation of waves,

about storm systems, about the ocean's relationship to climate.

You have to remember that this is all new.

Nobody knows what the ocean is like.

So there's a lot of really compelling information

that transcends that term.

It's not just information, it's revelation.

It's this immersive experience.

Narrator : "It is a work of science," one critic raved.

"It is stamped with authority.

It is a work of art:

It is saturated with the excitement of mystery.

It is literature."

CRAMER : What she has done is to take a very complicated subject

and distill it into its essence,

and bring the reader right there.

So science, which can be

extraordinarily impersonal and dry,

has suddenly become immediate and very important.

Narrator : Three weeks after it appeared in bookstores,

The Sea Around Us made The New York Times bestseller list.

Amid the near-universal praise for the book,

there occasionally emerged a distorted portrait of Carson

as a working scientist with rare literary gifts,

or as an experienced diver who'd come to know her subject

at a depth of a hundred feet.

Thrilled about the book's success

but dismayed at the attention focused on its author,

Carson did nothing to correct the misconceptions.

SOUDER : Critic after critic

would remark in some way, either off handedly or directly,

how amazing it was

that a woman understood these technical matters

and wrote so beautifully about them,

particularly because the ocean was such a hostile place,

where, you know, presumably only men could go.

So Carson had to endure that.

And so I think letting this fiction stand

was her little way of kind of getting even

with the people that doubted her or doubted her gender.

I think it amused her.

Narrator : By early September, The Sea Around Us

had reached number one on the bestseller list.

There it would remain for an astonishing 32 weeks.

When it at last dropped a notch, it was joined on the list

by a re-issue of Carson's first book,

in what The New York Times called

a "publishing phenomenon as rare as a total solar eclipse."

At 44, Rachel Carson, the one-time "would-be writer,"

had two of the country's non-fiction bestsellers.

LYTLE : The Sea Around Us was

one of the bestselling science books of all time.

It sold almost two million copies

in its initial publication.

It was also translated into, I think, 30 foreign languages,

so it was an international bestseller.

It won the National Book Award.

So it really made her a public figure

with a very large following.

Narrator : "We have been troubled about the world,

and had almost lost faith in man," one reader wrote Carson.

"It helps to think about the long history of the Earth,

and of how life came to be.

When we think in terms of millions of years,

we are not so impatient

that our own problems be solved tomorrow."

MILITARY SPOKESMAN : You have a grandstand seat here

to one of the most momentous events

in the history of science.

This is the first full-scale test of a hydrogen device.

If the reaction goes, we're in the thermonuclear era.

MAN (on loudspeaker) : It is now 30 seconds to zero time.

Put on goggles or turn away.

MAN (on loudspeaker) : 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

(explosion booming)

LEAR : Carson was always aware, I think,

from, especially, her time in government,

that some people looked at science

as discovering something beautiful and new,

and some people looked at science

as discovering ways in which to wage war,

to destroy things, not to create things,

that by the time of the Cold War,

there are really two sciences going on in the United States.

Narrator : World War II had raised the profile of American science.

Now the Cold War made it soar.

KINKELA : The atom was used in a very destructive way,

but it also suggested in many ways

that science was at the forefront of something grand.

This is the way in which we will solve the problems of the world.

Narrator : The laboratory was no longer merely the source

of the nation's military might.

It was also, ever increasingly,

a font of ingenious chemical tools

that gave mankind an edge

against its enemies in the natural world.

KINKELA : For any sort of question that deals with nature,

what is emerging in the postwar period

is that chemicals will solve the problem.

So if your question is about crop production, more chemicals.

If your question is about public health, more chemicals.

If your question is about,

"How do I protect my home from these unwanted pests?"

More chemicals.

BLUM : People are worshiping at the altar of science and technology

because finally it's making us the human masters of the planet,

and we're taking this incredibly dangerous,

un-nurturing landscape,

and it is now under our control.

Science is rewriting the way we live on Earth.

And so there was very little questioning.

Narrator : Rachel Carson was less sure.

To her, there seemed something dangerous about a world

in which human ingenuity knew no limits.

LEAR : She sees human beings in their post-World War II form

as being arrogant,

that human arrogance outruns human wisdom,

and we ought to try to put them back together

as equals again.

Narrator : When the demands of promoting The Sea Around Us

threatened to overwhelm her,

Carson escaped to Maine,

to a remote stretch of the central coast,

where slivers of land reach out into the ocean

and the tides rise higher than anywhere

along the Atlantic seaboard.

A research trip had first brought her to the area

some years before,

and it had since been her ambition,

as she'd put it to a friend,

"to be able to buy a place here

and then manage to spend a great deal of time in it."

Now, flush from the sales of two bestselling books,

she purchased a plot on Southport Island

and built a summer cottage of her own.

SOUDER : At the edge of her property,

there's this large area of rocky shelf tableland

that at high tide is under the water,

but at low tide is exposed.

And so this exposes all the crevices

and nooks and tidal pools

where starfish and periwinkles and sea anemones live.

All these creatures of this intertidal zone

that so fascinated Carson and always had,

that's all available to her right there.

MUSIL : She identifies with the creatures who live on the edge,

this borderland between the power of water

that could also crush you,

and its ability to release life and to create new life.

Rachel wanted to be still, to feel and to imagine,

and this was the place that would allow her to do that.

Narrator : Before her house was even habitable,

Carson received a letter from a Mrs. Dorothy Freeman,

whose family owned a cottage a half-mile up the shoreline

from Carson's property.

Dorothy's husband, Stanley,

had been given a copy of The Sea Around Us

for his birthday.

MARTHA FREEMAN : My grandparents had read it out loud to each other

sailing or on the porch of their cottage,

and had adored it.

It really spoke to a lot of what they cared about in life.

My grandmother read about Rachel coming

in the local newspaper,

and sent her a little welcoming note in 1952,

and she got a note back.

Narrator : Despite all the attention

that recently had been showered upon her,

requests for interviews, speaking invitations,

mountains of fan mail,

Carson felt isolated

and more than usually burdened by her family.

Maria Carson, as she aged, had grown demanding and jealous

of Rachel's time and attention.

And then there was niece Marjorie,

who had taken up with a married man

and become pregnant.

LYTLE : Carson and her mother arranged

to have the woman admitted to a special home,

where she had the baby and kept it out of the public eye,

and sort of protected her from the rumor mill and whatnot.

Carson once wrote, she said,

"If ever I was bitter about anything,

I was bitter about that."

The problems with her niece really detracted

from the joy and the wonderful sense of success she felt

for The Sea Around Us.

Narrator : Having finally resigned her position

at the Fish and Wildlife Service

to dedicate herself to writing,

Carson lacked even the companionship of colleagues.

The friendship that bloomed with the Freemans

was a revelation to her.

The couple shared her love for nature and the sea,

and enthusiastically joined in her tide pool explorations,

Dorothy marveling at the unseen life

that teemed at the shoreline,

while Stanley took photographs.

But of the two, it was Dorothy to whom Carson felt most drawn.

FREEMAN : I think Rachel had the same experience in a way

that I had with my grandmother,

in that she was just so present, so much herself,

so comfortable in herself,

that she was really open to seeing who you were, listening.

You totally felt heard and understood.

I did, anyway, and I believe Rachel did.

She was just a very comfortable person to be with,

a really wonderful friend to have.

SOUDER : Dorothy Freeman and Rachel Carson had,

almost from the beginning,

this deep, deep, emotional connection

that they would later describe as the ability

to know exactly what the other one was thinking

about everything,

to feel as though they were inside the other person's head

at all times.

Everything they each loved about the world

hit them in the same way.

Narrator : Dorothy was 55, the mother of a grown son,

a new grandmother, a devoted homemaker and wife.

Now, as the summer turned to fall

and Southport was abandoned for the season,

she became the confidante

that Carson, at 46, had never had.

CARSON (dramatized) : Darling Dorothy,

I don't suppose anyone really knows

how a creative writer works

or what sort of nourishment his spirit must have.

All I am certain of is this:

that it is quite necessary for me

to know that there is someone

who is deeply devoted to me as a person,

and who also has the capacity and the depth of understanding

to share vicariously the sometimes crushing burden

of creative effort.

Last summer I was feeling, as never before,

that there was no one who combined all of that.

And then, my dear one, you came into my life!

SOUDER : They started writing letters to each other,

and the letters became more and more frequent,

and they very quickly escalated

to include a level of personal affection

that was surprising to everyone except to them.

Before they ever see each other in person again,

they've declared their love for each other.

Carson never really had any relationships.

She never dated.

I think she knew that Dorothy was the one person

who really was the one person, the soulmate.

And the beauty is that Dorothy feels the same thing in her way,

to the extent that she can.

Narrator : In phone calls and occasional visits,

and in letter after letter,

Carson poured out to Dorothy

the challenges of completing her third book,

an Atlantic shore guide

she'd agreed to write for Houghton Mifflin

even before The Sea Around Us had been published.

Freed at last to do nothing but write,

Carson found the task nearly impossible.

Again and again, her approach to the guide changed.

Entire chapters were laboriously revised,

and what was meant to be a two-year project

soon stretched into four.

CARSON (dramatized) : Maybe the easiest way for me to write a chapter

would be to type "Dear Dorothy" on the first page!

As a matter of fact,

you and your particular kind of interest and appreciation

were in my mind a great deal

when I was rewriting parts of the section on rocky shores.

SOUDER : Once they're together,

and they're rarely physically together,

they're almost always in different places

writing letters to each other,

once they're together, they're never apart.

There's never any question between them.

FREEMAN : There's a huge amount of affection.

I mean, it is love.

It is the love of kindred spirits.

They wrote to each other three, four, five times a week.

So their relationship was always this caring at a distance.

They knew each other for about 12 years,

and I think I added it up at one point

that they were probably in each other's presence

for, at most, 60 days.

Narrator : When The Edge of the Sea,

the widely-acclaimed third volume

in Carson's marine trilogy,

finally hit bookstores in the summer of 1955,

it would be dedicated not to her mother,

as The Sea Around Us had been,

but to Dorothy and Stanley Freeman.

(theme song playing)

ANNOUNCER : Let's face it: the threat of hydrogen bomb warfare

is the greatest danger our nation has ever known.

Enemy jet bombers carrying nuclear weapons

can sweep over a variety of routes

and drop bombs on any important target in the United States.

The threat of this destruction has affected our way of life

in every city, town, and village from coast to coast.

These are the signs of the times.

(air raid siren blaring)

KINKELA : You can imagine what it might be like

to be thinking and hearing almost all the time

that you could die at any moment, right?

That the Soviet Union will attack.

There's going to be no warning,

and the only way that you could protect yourselves

is to duck and cover yourselves

with whatever you have around you.

The threat was incredibly palpable.

Narrator : More and more,

when Rachel Carson raised her eyes

to take in the man-made world around her,

what she felt was a quiet rage.

The Cold War had become

a macabre game of one-up's man ship,

a high-stakes standoff

fueled by the threat of nuclear destruction.

Then, on March 1, 1954,

the United States pressed for the lead

with the test of a dry-fuel hydrogen bomb,

code-named "Shrimp."

SOUDER : Everything goes right with this test

except the things that go wrong,

and the things that go wrong are really big problems.

The explosion was much more powerful

than the scientists had predicted,

about 2 1/2 times more powerful than it was supposed to be;

largest explosion that had ever occurred

on the face of the Earth

that wasn't a volcano.

Narrator : Radioactive fallout scattered

over more than 5,000 square miles

and then drifted downward,

settling on open ocean, inhabited islands,

and a hapless Japanese fishing boat

named Lucky Dragon Number 5.

SOUDER : This gray, snow-like ash begins to fall out of the sky

and it coats the ship from stem to stern.

It gets on every surface.

And it coats the men.

It gets in their eyes.

They're tasting it to see if they can figure out what it is.

That becomes apparent within a couple of days,

because very soon, everybody on the ship is sick.

Narrator : By the time the Lucky Dragon returned to port,

everyone on board had succumbed to radiation poisoning,

their skin blackened, their hair falling out in clumps.

Their ordeal made headlines all over the world.

SOUDER : For the first time, people realized

that the real danger in nuclear war

was not the explosions themselves,

but the fallout,

this total contamination of the Earth

that had the potential to wipe out

every living organism on the face of the Earth.

Narrator : The Atomic Energy Commission and other government agencies

now issued a flurry of reassurances

that atmospheric testing was safe,

and that fallout constituted no appreciable danger

outside of the test zone.

FILM ANNOUNCER : The atomic cloud, like a giant vacuum cleaner,

has sucked up dirt and debris from the Earth

and is full of radioactive particles.

Is it dangerous?

Yes, right now it is.

You wouldn't want to go into it,

but neither would you deliberately walk

into a blazing fire.

You have to use common sense.

BLUM : It's really easy for us to look back

at something like above-ground nuclear testing

and think, "Well, that was a primitive moment."

But people had just suffered through a really terrible war.

Tens and tens and tens of thousands of young Americans

had died abroad.

And so you can also say to yourself, as they did,

"We have to have the weapon that ends all wars."

Right?

"And if there's some sacrifice involved,

well, you know, that's for the greater good."

KINKELA : People were not dying because of nuclear tests.

And that is tied to the question of how people understood harm.

And throughout much of the 20th century

and into the early 1950s,

it was really about sort of the question of,

does this kill you?

Very simple.

Is it acutely toxic, and if so,

how much can a human body withstand

before it kills somebody?

Narrator : Carson framed the question differently,

and her doubts about the vector of modern technological science

now began to harden into a certainty.

LEAR : Now she has to come to grips with the fact

that humans can destroy nature.

So her mission, if you will, is to show the world

what a perfect thing the natural systems are

and how easily the hand of man can muck it up.

And that becomes a theme in everything

that she starts to write.

It's the undercurrent.

Narrator : By the close of 1954,

Carson had a title in mind, Remembrance of Earth,

and a vague idea for a book that would illuminate

the relation of life to its environment.

But months gave way to years,

and she made no progress with it.

Then, in early January 1957,

her niece Marjorie contracted a pneumonia so severe

she had to be hospitalized.

Two weeks later, Marjie was dead,

and her five-year-old son Roger became Carson's responsibility.

ROGER CHRISTIE : Rachel kind of had a hard life that way.

You know, first she had to raise my mother and my mother's sister

because their parents died when they were very young,

and then the same thing repeated itself

just when she was getting out from under it.

She was very considerate of my feelings all the time,

sometimes to the detriment of her own work.

Narrator : In the spring, on the heels of her 50th birthday,

Carson legally became Roger's adoptive mother

and tried to resign herself to her changed circumstances.

But as she confessed to Dorothy,

she could not entirely keep herself

from feeling a dark resentment.

She was all but convinced

she'd never again have the time to write.

Then, friends told her

about a U.S. Department of Agriculture program

to eradicate the fire ant,

and more than a decade after

she'd proposed the piece about DDT to Reader's Digest,

pesticides came roaring back into her consciousness.

ANNOUNCER : The fire ant is believed to have entered this country

from South America in 1925.

The destructive insect has brought heavy losses to crops

in Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana.

Once they swarm across a field like this, nothing survives.

LYTLE : The fire ant was the perfect invasive species

for the Cold War era.

They were red, they snuck into the country,

they were subversive, and they were mostly annoying.

For some reason, the Department of Agriculture

got it into their head that, scientists there,

that this would be a perfect demonstration

of the power of pesticides to solve a nagging problem.

Narrator : The enthusiasm for DDT and other synthetic pesticides

had given way to the conviction that science could do far more

than control insects and other unwanted pests.

The objective now was eradication.

KINKELA : It meant extermination, extermination of the species.

So in 1955, you see the advent

of the World Health Organization's

Malaria Eradication Program,

which was in many ways designed to exterminate

not the problem of malaria, but the problem of mosquitoes.

The Fire Ant Eradication Program was the same idea.

Scientists are convinced that this is the right way to go.

And if we fail, then we're going to fail humanity.

It becomes this all-or-nothing equation.

ORESKES : And so what we see in the 1950s is tremendous amounts of money

going into studying pest killing,

not so much money going into studying

broader questions of wildlife biology,

broader questions of environmental health,

broader questions of environmental toxicity.

LYTLE : The people involved, the scientists and whatnot,

who are inventing pesticides,

think they're doing God's work,

and that they are also helping the United States keep its edge

in the Cold War environment.

The Department of Agriculture and the chemical industry say,

one of the reasons that we have such a rich material life

is that we have found ways to control these problems,

to maximize food and fiber production,

and it's one of the things that distinguishes

the U.S. and its allies from the Communist bloc.

Our standard of living is so much higher

and we owe it to human ingenuity.

Narrator : In 1957, in the U.S.D.A.'s all-out war

against the fire ant,

some 20 million acres in the South

were doused with pesticides, killing not only ants,

but blackbirds and meadowlarks, armadillos and opossums.

The sprayed areas,

as one Alabama agricultural official reported,

"reeked with the odor of decaying wildlife."

LYTLE : The hunting-fishing community was outraged.

County agricultural agents

dropped their support for the project

and it really was a black eye

for the Department of Agriculture,

but it was a warning for Carson.

Narrator : What concerned Carson was not merely

that synthetic pesticides had unintended consequences,

but that substances about which so little was known

were now practically ubiquitous.

Widely employed by government agencies

to protect health and agriculture,

as well as American interests abroad,

synthetic pesticides also were sold directly to consumers,

who, by 1957, could choose

from an array of some 6,000 different products.

SOUDER : You could get shelf paper for your kitchen cabinets

that was impregnated with DDT.

You could get paints and varnishes that had DDT in them.

One of my favorite devices, and my father owned this,

was a cylinder about the size and shape of a beer can,

and it had DDT in it.

It attached to the muffler of your lawn mower,

so the hot exhaust gas would volatilize the DDT

and spray a fog out across your yard.

So if you were having company over for a picnic later,

you could poison the grass before they got there

and nobody would get a mosquito bite.

(engine slowly starting)

Narrator : Although manufacturers were required by law

to register new chemical compounds,

the government mandated

no independent safety testing of those compounds

and placed no limitation on their sale or use.

So long as the label provided safe-use instructions,

the product was deemed to be safe under the law.

ORESKES : That's, of course, reinforced

by the manufacturers of the pesticides.

The companies that are manufacturing DDT

focus on this question of immediate short-term toxicity.

They say, "Well, look, it's not toxic.

"We applied it on all these soldiers in World War II

and they were all fine, so that proves that this is fine."

KINKELA : You had examples of people digesting spoonfuls of DDT

just to prove how safe it was.

At the same time, birds are dying en masse,

fish are dying,

and I think Rachel understood

that something radically transformative was happening,

this sense that scientists had been asking the wrong question.

Scientists had been thinking about

the question of acute toxicity,

rather than, what are the long-term impacts

of this chemical world that we're creating?

LEAR : Carson is not eager to take on pesticides.

She's too busy and life is too complicated,

but there's this story there, so she knows there's a story.

On the other hand, it's also the fact

that it is the story about human hubris.

CARSON (dramatized) : It was pleasant to believe that much of Nature

was forever beyond the tampering reach of man.

He might level the forests and dam the streams,

but the clouds and the rain and the wind were God's.

But I have now opened my eyes and my mind.

I may not like what I see,

but it does no good to ignore it,

and it's worse than useless to go on repeating

the old "eternal verities" that are no more eternal

than the hills of the poets.

Narrator : Rachel Carson had long known that scientists were divided

on the issue of synthetic pesticides

and that conclusions about their safety

depended on who was asked.

ORESKES : You have scientists who are working closely

with the Department of Agriculture

and with the chemical industry,

and are part of a mindset, a worldview that says,

"I've got a pest, I've got a boll weevil or a gypsy moth,

"and I want to kill that pest, and I want to kill effectively,

without killing the person who is applying it to the crops."

And so almost all the attention

is either on the killing of the pest

or the non-killing of the farmer.

But on the other hand, you have wildlife biologists

who are not linked to any particular industry,

they're out in nature,

they're thinking about the interrelations

between fish, birds, pollinators, plants,

chemicals, and the environment,

and so they see there's evidence of problems.

Narrator : For Carson, it began with research,

a gathering of bits of information

excavated from technical reports and obscure scientific journals.

What soon became clear was that pesticides such as DDT

accumulated in the organisms exposed to them,

and grew ever more concentrated as they moved up the food chain.

According to one study, earthworms were still so toxic

a full year after exposure to DDT

that they poisoned the robins that fed upon them.

Another demonstrated

that when birds were fed a miniscule amount of DDT daily,

both their fertility and the survival rate of their young

dramatically declined.

Most troubling of all was the evidence

that insect populations very quickly

developed resistance to synthetic pesticides.

ORESKES : If you dump large amounts of pesticides in a field,

you will kill many of the insects

you intend to kill,

but there'll be some fragment that survive

because for whatever reason,

they happen to be more resistant.

That sub-population lives on,

they breed, they pass on to their offspring

whatever that resistance is that they have,

and pretty soon you have

a pesticide-resistant population.

Carson fully understood

that ultimately this strategy was going to fail,

and the farmer would be in the position

of either needing a different pesticide

or using more and more and more.

And so then you have a kind of arms race of pesticide use.

You use more pesticides, insects become more resistant,

more resistance, more pesticides,

more resistance, and now you're trapped in an escalating cycle,

and it's a damaging cycle,

because meanwhile you're also killing fish and birds

and other things that you like and that you want.

Narrator : In isolation, each study Carson read

was little more than an anecdote.

Taken together, they offered compelling evidence

that synthetic pesticides had potentially grave disadvantages,

none of which were yet fully understood.

LYTLE : She was not against the wise use of pesticides.

She saw the need for that.

But what she was against

was the indiscriminate spreading of poisons

that had untold and unanticipated consequences

for all living things, humans included.

Narrator : "I realized that here was the material for a book,"

Carson later recalled.

"Everything which meant most to me as a naturalist

"was being threatened, and nothing I could do

would be more important."

In May 1958,

she signed a contract with Houghton Mifflin

for what her friend and editor Paul Brooks had dubbed

"the poison book."

It was slated to be a short volume, perhaps 50,000 words,

of which William Shawn of The New Yorker

already had offered to publish two excerpts.

Only Dorothy had misgivings.

LEAR : It's a book about death, and it's a book about destruction,

and Dorothy's not comfortable,

and she's not comfortable with Rachel writing that,

using her talent for beauty and beautiful words

to write about the elixirs of death.

She had Rachel before

when she's writing about tide pools and beautiful things.

She can't follow her in this research.

CARSON (dramatized) : You do know, I think,

how deeply I believe in the importance of what I am doing.

Knowing what I do,

there would be no future peace for me

if I kept silent.

LEAR : She wants to tell that story, and try to tell it fairly,

and tell it scientifically,

but she's got an argument from the beginning.

It isn't, "Well, let's talk

about the good and bad of pesticides."

And the first titles of this book

are Man Against the Earth and Man the Destroyer.

Carson's underlying anger is right there.

LYTLE : In a sense, she was going public with a lot of data

that was somewhat inconclusive or premature.

On the other hand, she felt,

what is the morality of remaining quiet

when you have a huge amount of circumstantial evidence

that points to a substance being toxic or dangerous?

You know, advocacy is not something

scientists of the time were wont to do,

but for Carson, it became a crusade.

Narrator : On November 22, 1958,

with Carson deep into the research for her book,

Maria, now 89, suffered a stroke.

When she died on the morning of December 1,

Rachel was at her bedside, holding her hand.

"More than anyone else I know,

she embodied a reverence for life," Carson told a friend.

"And she could fight fiercely

against anything she believed wrong,

as in our present crusade!

Knowing how she felt about that will help me

to carry it through to completion."

Just weeks later, Carson was back to work,

driven by the growing certainty

that manmade pesticides menaced not only the environment,

but human health.

LEAR : Carson is convinced that there is this link

between pesticides and cancer in humans.

And that is going to be an explosive part to this book

that she didn't initially plan,

and she has to be very careful of how she puts that out.

Narrator : Once again, the evidence was preliminary,

much of it as yet unpublished.

It was also well outside

Carson's training as a biologist,

and therefore difficult for her to parse.

But the more she learned, the more focused she became

on the parallels between synthetic pesticides

and radioactive fallout.

SOUDER : They operated in much the same way.

They were widely dispersed.

You could absorb a body burden of both of them.

Both of them were being linked to cancer and birth defects.

Things would happen years, even decades after the exposure.

These were long-range problems

that you didn't know were happening

when they were happening.

Narrator : Events soon bolstered Carson's case.

In the spring of 1959,

government officials publicly admitted

that they had underestimated the hazards of nuclear fallout.

Of particular concern was the radionuclide strontium-90,

which had made its way into the nation's dairy supply

and was now thought to cause leukemia, bone cancer,

and birth defects.

LYTLE : This is the height of the Baby Boom,

and so you have a nation focused

on its child and family life

being potentially poisoned by this by-product

of the nuclear testing regime.

Narrator : As Carson's editor, Paul Brooks, told her,

"All this publicity about fallout

"gives you a head start in awakening people

to the dangers of chemicals."

Then, just before Thanksgiving 1959

came the so-called cranberry scare.

LYTLE : People of my generation

remember the Thanksgiving with no cranberry sauce.

Farmers in Oregon

had sprayed their cranberry bogs with a pesticide,

but they did it in the wrong growth cycle,

so that it got into the berries themselves

and then into the national food supply.

SOUDER : It was potentially a cancer-causing agent.

This might have been one of the first public demonstrations

of the hazards of chemical pesticides.

Of course, this alarmed the public,

who wanted their cranberries but didn't want to be poisoned,

and it greatly distressed the cranberry industry.

To Carson, this was just exhibit A

in a story she'd already formed in her own mind

and was ready to tell.

Narrator : With shipments of cranberries being seized for inspection

and panicked grocers pulling cranberry products from shelves,

Oregon's bad berries were on the verge

of ruining a $50 million crop.

Growers in other states cried foul,

and government officials went into high gear

to shore up the industry.

Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Benson

had himself photographed eating cranberries.

On the presidential campaign trail,

Senator John F. Kennedy quaffed a cranberry juice toast,

while his opponent, Vice President Richard Nixon,

swallowed down four full helpings

of the supposedly tainted fruit.

SOUDER : Whether the public was reassured by that, we can't know.

But it demonstrated that there was

this inherent coalition, this inherent partnership

between the government and its clients in industry--

the chemicals industry, the agricultural industry--

that would be very resistant to the ideas

that Carson was going to propose,

that she was going to come head-to-head

with the massed might

of the U.S. economy and the U.S. government

if she tried to prove to the public

that they were being poisoned.

Narrator : "I think you know,"

one of Carson's research contacts warned her,

"how grim this struggle with the U.S. government

and the whole chemical industry

is bound to be."

Initially, she'd thought it a nuisance:

first, in early January 1960, a painful ulcer,

then a sinus infection that laid her low for weeks,

then two lumps in her left breast,

discovered during an examination in March.

LEAR : Carson is making progress.

She knows she's going to finish this book.

And suddenly she's got this catalogue of illnesses

that happen to her.

She was never very good at facing up to limitations.

Probably none of us are, but she's in denial

and she hides it under the covers of herself,

and to herself,

and just tries to plow through it.

Narrator : Carson had a history of breast tumors

and twice had had them surgically removed.

This time, one tumor was "suspicious enough"

to require a radical mastectomy.

Still, the surgeon assured her

that no malignancy had been found,

so Carson sought no further treatment.

It was only when she discovered

a hard lump on her rib, months later,

that she sought a second opinion

and learned that the surgeon had withheld the truth.

According to the pathology report,

the removed tumor had in fact been malignant,

and it had metastasized to her lymph nodes.

SOUDER : It was common at the time for doctors in such situations

to discuss a diagnosis, a prognosis, a treatment

with a woman's husband,

who they believed would be better able

to handle this information, process it,

make decisions if decisions had to be made.

LYTLE : It may also be that the cancer

was sufficiently far enough advanced

that he figured,

"Well, there's nothing much we can do about this.

We've done what we can."

But, you know, in the process,

he denied her six months of potential treatment

that might have mitigated the cancer

or might have extended her life.

Narrator : Carson's first thought was for her privacy.

"Somehow I have no wish

to read of my ailments in literary gossip columns,"

she told a friend.

"Too much comfort to the chemical companies!"

SOUDER : She was sure that she would be accused

of having written the book as a retribution

against the chemical industry

on the unfounded allegation that pesticides caused cancer.

She understood this was a serious risk

and this would be a point of attack against her.

Narrator : The months that followed were excruciating:

radiation treatments, a flare-up of her ulcer,

a staph infection that progressed

to septic arthritis in her knees and ankles.

By the end of January 1961, she was unable to walk

and could barely stand.

CARSON (dramatized) : Darling,

you know my high hopes

for the goal I might meet by March,

hopes I entertained last October!

Now I look back

at the complete and devastating wreckage of those plans,

not only no writing for months, but the nearly complete loss

of any creative feeling or desire.

Sometimes I wonder whether the Author even exists anymore.

CHRISTIE : I think she handled it as well as she could.

You know, the only negative thing

I would have to say about it in retrospect was,

she wasn't honest enough with me about it,

although who knows whether that would've been a good thing?

You know, but that's all I remember about it,

just that it was kind of a broken time.

Narrator : To her research files on cancer,

Carson now began to save clippings

on experimental treatments and improbable miracle cures.

She would never be truly healthy again,

but as soon as the radiation treatments were finished,

she went back to work.

CHRISTIE : The book became a race for her to finish.

That was the one time where it would impact on us

in that, you know, she would say,

"I have to go and lock myself in the study

"and you have to go amuse yourself,

and that's just the way it is."

And that got more and more intense as time went on.

Narrator : In late January 1962,

nearly four years after she'd begun to write it,

Carson finally submitted the bulk of the manuscript

to both Houghton Mifflin and The New Yorker.

It was, she wrote Dorothy,

"like reaching the last station before the summit of Everest."

William Shawn called as soon as he'd finished reading it.

Silent Spring, he told her, was "a brilliant achievement."

That night, while listening to her favorite violin concerto

alone in her study,

Carson wept.

CARSON (dramatized) : Darling, I could never again listen happily to a thrush song

if I had not done all I could.

And last night the thoughts

of all the birds and other creatures

and all the loveliness that is in nature

came to me with such a surge of deep happiness,

that now I had done what I could.

I had been able to complete it.

Now it had its own life.

Narrator : On June 16, 1962,

as the elements of Silent Spring

were being prepared for publication,

the first New Yorker installment arrived on the newsstands,

and with its opening paragraphs

lured readers into a fertile world of plenty.

READER : "There was once a town in the heart of America

where all life seemed to live

in harmony with its surroundings.

The town lay in the midst

of a checkerboard of prosperous farms,

with fields of grain and hillsides of orchards

where, in spring, white clouds of bloom

drifted above the green fields."

LYTLE : The birds sing, and the woods are filled with living things,

and it's an abundant, happy place.

And then suddenly the residents discover the birds are gone

and the animals have died

and many of the plants have withered.

SOUDER : People start to get sick for reasons that can't be explained.

Livestock have stunted offspring.

Everything goes bad.

READER : "In the gutters under the eaves

and between the shingles of the roofs,

a few patches of white granular powder could be seen.

Some weeks earlier, this powder had been dropped, like snow,

upon the roofs and the lawns, the fields and the streams.

No witchcraft, no enemy action

had snuffed out life in this stricken world.

The people had done it themselves."

ORESKES : She creates an image of silence.

"What would it be like if you woke up in the morning

and you went outside

and instead of hearing birds chirp or sing,

you heard nothing?"

And that's so amazingly powerful, right?

And it just, you know, it stops you in your tracks.

Narrator : In the zealous quest for mastery, Carson argued,

synthetic pesticides had been used indiscriminately,

excessively, heedlessly,

upsetting the delicate balance of nature

and putting all life at risk.

LYTLE : She felt that proponents of widespread pesticide use

were conducting an experiment with life itself

without having done adequate testing or research

to determine what the consequences might be.

And that the citizenry weren't being informed

because the proponents of pesticides

were telling them only one side of the story

and the one that benefited their own interests.

And so all these things are part

of the Cold War consensus by which Americans lived:

the benevolence of corporations, the authority of science.

Well, Carson's challenging all of those things.

Narrator : The furor arose even before

the second and third installments of Silent Spring

hit the newsstands.

The New Yorker was deluged with letters.

So, too, was the U.S.D.A.

Most of those who wrote,

an agency spokesman told The New York Times,

expressed "horror and amazement"

that the use of such toxic chemicals

was even permitted.

CRAMER : She raised the level of awareness

of the general public

of all of these chemical applications

and why we need to think about their implications.

People were deeply moved and frightened by what she said.

Narrator : Scientists for the chemical industry and the U.S.D.A.

were incensed by Carson's assertions.

What, they wondered publicly, was the death of a songbird

against the possibility

of ending malaria or world hunger?

As one industry chemist put it,

"DDT alone has saved as many human lives

"over the past 15 years

as all the wonder drugs combined."

LYTLE : The proponents of pesticides argued

that you have to take risks to go forward.

That's very much part

of our scientific, technological culture.

BLUM : They saw themselves

as doing something in the higher good.

They were fostering human development.

They were killing plagues.

They were making the world a better place.

ORESKES : Carson herself acknowledged

there was this benefit through the use of pesticides.

But the whole point of her argument

is that there's been a kind of an assumption and a rush.

The benefits were obvious, so people rushed

to take advantage of those benefits,

but there were these other problems

that were maybe not as obvious,

but actually might outweigh the benefits.

Narrator : By August, with the publication of the book

still more than a month away,

the controversy over Silent Spring

had reached the nation's capital,

and a special Science Advisory Committee

had been convened

to review all federal policies on pesticides.

On August 28, the subject even found its way into one

of the president's regular televised press conferences.

REPORTER : There appears to be growing concern among scientists

as to the possibility

of dangerous long-range side effects

from the widespread use of DDT and other pesticides.

Have you considered asking the Department of Agriculture

or the Public Health Service

to take a closer look at this?

Yes, and I know that they already are,

I think particularly, of course, since Miss Carson's book,

but they are examining the matter.

SOUDER : You can only imagine how worried

the people who made these pesticides were.

When President Kennedy said,

Yeah, we're going to look into this.

We're going to reach in to the private sector

and see if we need to regulate these products

in a different way,"

that was a threat.

That's a threat to the bottom line.

That's a threat to the business that these companies were in.

LYTLE : They formed essentially a war council

to get together and develop a propaganda campaign

to discredit Carson,

to discredit the science in her book,

and to defend their practices.

Narrator : From public relations departments

throughout the chemical industry

now came a flood of bulletins and brochures

which emphasized the benefits of pesticides.

The Monsanto Company, an industry leader,

papered news outlets across the country

with a spoof of Silent Spring's opening chapter,

in which a pesticide-free world

loses millions to yellow fever and malaria...

FILM NARRATOR : She dines on healthy blood,

and in payment leaves the chills and fever of malaria.

Narrator : ...and crop-ravaging insects drive humanity

to the brink of famine.

Silent Spring, critics charged,

was a "high-pitched, emotional,

scientifically indefensible" screed.

To heed Carson's call for restraint, it was argued,

meant nothing less than "the end of all human progress."

KINKELA : There is this sort of real tension

between this understanding of chemical sciences

as a sort of hyper-masculine, lab-intensive research

that produces these wonderful technologies

and these scientists who work in nature,

who examine issues over the long term,

but who really aren't scientists.

They're sort of like a cult.

And having a woman at this particular moment

being the lead spokesperson of that kind of idea

really chafed,

and made the chemical scientists really angry.

ORESKES : The idea that this woman,

you know, this woman with what, a master's degree,

that she knows something that we don't know?

You know, you just see their condescension towards her

in their just really dismissive approach

and their misrepresentation of her work.

They try to accuse her of rejecting modernity,

of being unrealistic, of wanting to ban all pesticides,

none of which are true,

but it's a way to try to discredit her

and discredit the argument,

and it's a way to not even have the argument.

Narrator : Concerned the attacks from industry scientists

created the impression

that the science was "all on the other side,"

Carson prevailed upon Houghton Mifflin

to publish a rebuttal to her critics.

LYTLE : The commercial, monetary, political resources

that the agencies and the businesses

that were arrayed against her could command

were daunting indeed.

But many scientists strongly supported Carson

and accepted her case and even contributed to it.

ORESKES : The worst thing you could say about Silent Spring

is actually a compliment: It's not a work of science.

And that's true, it's not a work of science.

It's a work of science communication.

She is communicating to us what scientists have to say

and she's communicating the meaning

of that scientific work.

She makes clear what's at stake, and that's her great gift.

Narrator : In the end, Silent Spring flew off the shelves.

Within two weeks of its official publication, on September 27,

65,000 copies had been sold.

Before long, it was a runaway bestseller.

Every major publication in the country reviewed the book.

More than 70 newspapers also ran editorials.

Carson, meanwhile, was the subject

of so many magazine articles and cartoons

that she and Roger began to collect them.

Absent from all the publicity was the fact

that Carson's cancer had spread to the right side of her body

and that she was once again undergoing radiation treatments.

Inundated with interview requests,

Carson agreed that fall

to only two that involved cameras:

a profile in LIFE magazine

and an appearance on CBS Reports

with Eric Sevareid.

For both, she wore a heavy, dark wig

she'd purchased at Elizabeth Arden.

The two-day interview session with CBS

at her home in Silver Spring

was so taxing that it became plain to Sevareid

that Carson was ill.

Get the piece on the air as soon as possible,

he urged his producer.

"You've got a dead leading lady."

LEAR : Carson was determined as a young girl.

She was determined to get an education.

She was determined to be a writer.

She was determined to find something to write about.

And with Silent Spring,

she was determined that this message would get out.

She's willing to endure almost everything

to get that message out.

CARSON : My text this afternoon is taken

from The Globe Times of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania,

a news item in the issue of October 12.

After describing in detail the reactions to Silent Spring

of the farm bureaus in two Pennsylvania counties,

the reporter continued:

"No one in either county farm office who was talked to today

had read the book,

but all disapproved of it heartily."

(audience laughing)

Narrator : In early December 1962,

in an address to the Women's National Press Club,

Rachel Carson finally answered her critics.

Challenging the industry's contention

that "chemicals are never used

unless tests have shown them to be safe,"

she reminded her audience

that pesticide manufacturers financed the studies

of their own products' safety.

I know that many thoughtful scientists are deeply disturbed

that their organizations are becoming fronts for industry.

Is industry becoming a screen

through which facts must be filtered

so that the hard, uncomfortable truths are kept back

and only the harmless morsels are allowed to filter through?

The tailoring, the screening of basic truth

is done to accommodate to the short-term gain,

to serve the gods of profit and production.

LEAR : She is calling for the population

to understand that money has a great deal to do

with what is done in science.

She says, "We need to ask who speaks and why.

What is done in the name of science

and why doesn't the public have a right to know?"

These are not just scientific questions.

These are questions that a social revolutionary asks.

CARSON : These are matters

of the most serious importance to society.

And I commend their study to you

as professionals in the field of communication.

Thank you.

(audience applauds)

Narrator : Unable to silence Carson,

the chemical industry lobbied hard

to muzzle the forthcoming CBS special on Silent Spring.

In March, just weeks before the program was slated to air,

the network was flooded

with mimeographed letters urging fairness,

a campaign orchestrated, CBS assumed,

by the chemical industry lobby.

Then, just days before the broadcast,

two of the show's five commercial sponsors pulled out,

followed swiftly by a third.

CBS was undaunted,

and on the evening of Wednesday, April 3, 1963,

"The Silent Spring of Rachel Carson"

was beamed into living rooms all across the country.

Good evening.

We are living in what has been called the synthetic age.

The age of the atom, the missile,

the frozen TV dinner.

In the next hour, you will hear

that this is also the age of the wormless apple

and the calculated risk.

Do you know how long

the pesticides persist in the water

once they get into it?

Not entirely.

Do you know the extent to which our groundwater

may be contaminated right now by pesticides?

We don't know that, either, nor do we know...

Narrator : As the program unfolded,

a welter of scientists and government officials,

as well as Carson herself,

argued the pros and cons of synthetic pesticides.

In the end, one fact was clear:

For every scientific certainty,

there was a host of unanswered questions.

CARSON : We have to remember

that children born today are exposed to these chemicals

from birth.

Perhaps even before birth.

Now, what is going to happen to them in adult life

as a result of that exposure?

We simply don't know.

Because we've never before had this kind of experience.

SEVAREID : A spokesman for the chemical industry,

Dr. Robert White-Stevens.

Miss Carson is concerned

with every possibility of hazard and danger,

whereas the agricultural school has to concern itself

with the probability, the likelihood of danger,

and to assess that against utility.

If we had to investigate every possibility,

we would never make any advances at all,

because this would require

an infinite time for experimental work,

and we would never be finished.

CARSON : We've heard the benefits of pesticides.

We've heard a great deal about their safety,

but very little about the hazards,

very little about the failures, the inefficiencies,

and yet the public was being asked to accept these chemicals,

was being asked to acquiesce in their use

and did not have the whole picture.

So I set about to remedy the balance there.

LEAR : CBS Reports becomes almost a second publication of the book.

People who hadn't read it and probably wouldn't have read it

can see that Rachel Carson is a very calm, rational woman

who is not frothing at the mouth and is not a raving Communist.

She's giving the public credit

for being able to understand science.

Narrator : With an audience estimated at between ten and 15 million,

"The Silent Spring of Rachel Carson"

catapulted the environment

to the top of the political agenda.

The next day, Senator Abraham Ribicoff,

chair of the subcommittee on government operations,

was charged with conducting a broad congressional review

of environmental hazards, including pesticides.

Then, on May 15, came the long-awaited report

from the president's Science Advisory Committee.

ORESKES : And they say in more prosaic language

what she has essentially already said in Silent Spring,

which is, "Yes, there are some benefits to using pesticides,

and no, we probably don't want to outlaw and ban

all pesticides tomorrow,

but there is substantial scientific evidence

that the indiscriminate use of pesticides,

the overuse of pesticides,

and particularly certain persistent pesticides like DDT

may be problematic."

Narrator : "I think it's a splendid report,"

Carson told a journalist.

"It's strong, it's objective,

and, I think, a very fair evaluation of the problem.

I feel that the report has vindicated me

and my principal contentions."

By now, Carson knew she didn't have long to live.

Despite ongoing radiation treatments,

the cancer had spread and spread again,

to her collarbone, her neck, her shoulder.

Though often in pain,

she kept her call for change insistent,

appearing in late May on the Today Show

and in early June before Ribicoff's Senate committee,

where she delivered 40 minutes of testimony

to a rapt, capacity crowd.

We have acquired technical skills

on a scale undreamed-of even a generation ago.

We can do dramatic things and we can do them quickly.

By the time damaging side effects are apparent,

it is often too late or impossible

to reverse our actions.

LEAR : She's aware that there will be changes coming

because of her words, because of her book,

so she's at peace, comfortable in some ways

with the fact that she's done the work that she set out to do.

If we are ever to solve the basic problem

of environmental contamination,

we must begin to count the many hidden costs

of what we are doing

and to weigh them against the gains or advantages.

SOUDER : Now we enter into a period of time

in which everyone understands

that the environment is an important subject,

that it's something we should talk about,

something we should consider

when we are using new technologies

that might adversely affect it.

It puts the government squarely into the middle

as a regulating authority,

as a force that can restrain technology.

This hadn't been part of the dialogue before.

CARSON (dramatized) : It seems strange, looking back over my life,

that all that went before this past decade

seems to have been merely preparation for it.

Into that decade have been crowded everything

I shall be remembered for.

Narrator : There was for Carson one last summer at Southport,

a summer filled with birdsong

and the sound of the wind in the spruce trees.

There were walks along the shore with Dorothy,

slow and ginger now on account of Carson's constant pain,

and bittersweet hours spent watching the surf

crash against the rocks.

FREEMAN : I don't think the kids, my brother and Roger and I,

understood that this was some big last deal.

But it was Rachel's last summer at Southport,

and she was unable to go down to the beach.

And yet, we all still had a lovely summer day going down

and bringing little creatures up to the cottage

for her to look at and talk to us about,

and then instruct us that they had to go back

where they came from.

I think I like that

as a quintessential and last memory,

because that was her essence, and there it was.

Narrator : The cancer spread to her pelvis,

then to her upper back and arms.

By October, back in Silver Spring,

Carson was spending most of her time in bed.

LEAR : She had all these other ideas of what she wanted to write.

I think she comes to terms with the fact

that she will lay down her pen without having done them all.

Um, but the biggest thing, of course,

is what to do with Roger.

To face the fact that when she dies,

which she doesn't really face well,

Roger needs a family,

and she can't seem to come to grips with that.

CHRISTIE : She tried to shield me from how serious it was,

and it was never...

You know, well, "I'm going to die."

I don't know how she expected it to work really,

beyond, you know, making provisions for me in her will.

It's not something we talked about.

FREEMAN : The best she could do was add a codicil to her will

that said it was her wish that either the Paul Brooks family,

Paul Brooks being her editor at Houghton Mifflin,

or my parents would take Roger in and would adopt Roger.

I think in the end she punted.

She just, wherever she was in her life,

the end of her life,

she didn't want to or couldn't make that decision.

Narrator : By spring, the cancer had spread to her brain.

Dorothy still wrote nearly every day,

but Carson no longer wrote back.

When Dorothy came for a visit in early April,

Carson was only dimly aware that she was there.

On April 14, 1964, Rachel Carson died.

She was 56 years old.

Some of her ashes were buried next to her mother's grave.

The rest Dorothy Freeman spread

over the ocean at Southport Island.

BLUM : There's a Before Rachel and After Rachel

in the way we think about what matters

in protecting the environment.

There are not very many people who you say,

"That person drove a paradigm shift,"

but she did.

And it's post Silent Spring

that you start seeing genuine environmental regulation

in a way that didn't exist before.

It's like a rain on a dry landscape.

That book was it.

LEAR : Silent Spring was the book that changed the world.

It taught us that life was fragile,

that it was mutable,

that science was not omniscient.

Her message was that there's an ongoing story.

It doesn't just stop with the removal of pesticides.

LYTLE : Many business and political types

who can't stand environmental regulation

have since been trying to discredit Rachel Carson.

They feel if they can discredit her,

they can in a sense deconstruct the environmental apparatus.

And they're still doing it.

It has not gone quiet.

ORESKES : Rachel Carson begins a conversation

that we needed to have, that we weren't having in 1963,

and that we still haven't really figured out

how to have in an appropriate way even today.

It's a conversation about the pros and cons of technology.

It's a conversation about the role of nature in our life

and about whether or not we make our lives better

through technological innovations

or whether we do damage that outweighs the benefits.

SOUDER : Carson said, "Let's try to look

at life from the other side.

Let's try to look at the natural world

as if we were actually a part of it."

That's a different way to understand things

than anyone had ever proposed before.

You're not separate.

You're human, but you're not separate from this living world.

♪

American Experience