Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
01:00:08,880 --> 01:00:10,159
King Charles
2
01:00:10,159 --> 01:00:11,559
Charles the First
3
01:00:11,559 --> 01:00:14,480
[they tend not to give you a number when you’re the first],
4
01:00:14,480 --> 01:00:18,000
was born on 19Â November 1600
5
01:00:18,199 --> 01:00:19,639
into the House of Stuart
6
01:00:19,639 --> 01:00:24,039
as the second son of King James VI of Scotland
7
01:00:24,039 --> 01:00:26,840
and was King of England, Scotland, and Ireland
8
01:00:27,119 --> 01:00:30,360
from 27 March 1625
9
01:00:30,360 --> 01:00:35,840
until his execution on 30 January 1649.
10
01:00:36,960 --> 01:00:44,639
“I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and
bear true allegiance to his majesty King Charles".
11
01:00:44,639 --> 01:00:46,000
…his Majesty King Charles.
12
01:00:46,239 --> 01:00:47,719
…to his majesty King Charles.
13
01:00:47,920 --> 01:00:48,679
King Charles.
14
01:00:49,000 --> 01:00:49,760
King Charles.
15
01:00:49,960 --> 01:00:51,039
…to his Majesty King Charles.
16
01:00:51,559 --> 01:00:52,639
…to his Majesty King Charles.
17
01:00:53,199 --> 01:00:54,280
…to his Majesty King Charles.
18
01:00:54,679 --> 01:00:55,760
…to his Majesty King Charles.
19
01:00:56,320 --> 01:00:58,039
…to his Majesty King Charles.
20
01:00:58,199 --> 01:00:58,960
King Charles.
21
01:00:59,440 --> 01:01:02,079
…that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance
22
01:01:02,079 --> 01:01:03,719
to his majesty King
Charles,
23
01:01:03,719 --> 01:01:05,440
his heirs and successors
24
01:01:05,440 --> 01:01:07,000
according to law,
25
01:01:07,000 --> 01:01:08,800
So help me God.
26
01:01:14,639 --> 01:01:18,880
MPs in the Commons swearing allegiance to the new King.
27
01:01:18,960 --> 01:01:23,559
So why are the UK’s most senior MPs and Parliamentary dignitaries
28
01:01:23,559 --> 01:01:28,079
now swearing an oath to a King that died 373 years ago?
29
01:01:29,039 --> 01:01:34,719
These people are usually such sticklers for
fastidious formality and precise titular protocol.
30
01:01:35,400 --> 01:01:41,360
Can they really be so incompetent or so wilfully
ignorant as to continue to parade this glaring mistake
31
01:01:41,639 --> 01:01:44,320
before the rest of the House and the eyes of the world?
32
01:01:46,320 --> 01:01:49,480
And if so, what do we pay them for?
33
01:01:50,559 --> 01:01:52,440
Everyone else seems to be getting it right.
34
01:01:52,440 --> 01:01:55,159
“King Charles the Third"
35
01:01:55,159 --> 01:01:57,840
"His Majesty King Charles the Third".
36
01:01:57,960 --> 01:01:59,760
"Charles the Third".
37
01:01:59,800 --> 01:02:01,119
"Charles the third"
38
01:02:01,280 --> 01:02:02,440
"King Charles the third”
39
01:02:02,800 --> 01:02:06,840
The Charles Philip Arthur George, Jimmy Saville’s pal,
40
01:02:06,840 --> 01:02:09,119
who was born in 1948,
41
01:02:09,119 --> 01:02:11,360
should really be formally addressed
42
01:02:11,360 --> 01:02:13,239
as King Charles the Third.
43
01:02:14,039 --> 01:02:16,800
That is, if he really were King.
44
01:02:22,280 --> 01:02:25,320
“At Buckingham Palace, which for 62 years has seen no Royal
births,
45
01:02:25,320 --> 01:02:28,039
his Royal Highness the Baby is born behind these windows.
46
01:02:28,599 --> 01:02:32,719
Broadcasting the news that all have waited for
is live programme announcer Franklin Engelmann.”
47
01:02:33,440 --> 01:02:35,920
“It has just been announced from Buckingham Palace
48
01:02:35,920 --> 01:02:39,360
that Her Royal Highness the Princess Elizabeth, Duchess of Edinburgh,
49
01:02:39,639 --> 01:02:43,280
was safely delivered of a Prince at 9.14pm
50
01:02:43,280 --> 01:02:46,440
and that Her Royal Highness and her son are both doing well”.
51
01:02:47,159 --> 01:02:51,960
A Common Law Court has already confirmed that Queen Elizabeth II
52
01:02:51,960 --> 01:02:56,920
was never lawfully crowned Queen at her coronation in 1953.
53
01:02:58,199 --> 01:03:03,840
And as we have conclusively proven in our previous video “The Stone of Destiny”,
54
01:03:03,840 --> 01:03:07,679
the ceremony was neither conducted lawfully nor legally,
55
01:03:07,880 --> 01:03:11,639
nor witnessed by God - via the Stone itself.
56
01:03:12,440 --> 01:03:18,480
And crucially, Elizabeth signed her coronation
oath above the written declaration
57
01:03:18,480 --> 01:03:22,480
and then lied to the people about the presence of the sacred Stone.
58
01:03:23,559 --> 01:03:28,719
And as a result, Charles, her son, can never become king.
59
01:03:32,159 --> 01:03:34,719
So why are they swearing an oath to a dead king?
60
01:03:35,559 --> 01:03:41,719
There is not a chance that the House of Commons and
its MP's would allow an error like this to take place.
61
01:03:42,119 --> 01:03:44,559
They know precisely what they are doing.
62
01:03:45,840 --> 01:03:49,000
Is it because they know that Charles is not the king
63
01:03:49,000 --> 01:03:50,480
and never can be,
64
01:03:50,480 --> 01:03:54,559
given the fact that they don't have the Stone of Destiny?
65
01:03:55,480 --> 01:03:56,840
And if so,
66
01:03:56,840 --> 01:03:58,960
does this mean that once again,
67
01:03:58,960 --> 01:04:01,880
they are being observably complicit
68
01:04:01,880 --> 01:04:04,440
in crimes against We the People?
69
01:04:04,440 --> 01:04:12,360
“...to his Majesty King Charles".
70
01:04:12,360 --> 01:04:13,000
King Charles.
71
01:04:13,239 --> 01:04:14,039
King Charles.
72
01:04:14,039 --> 01:04:14,840
King Charles.
73
01:04:14,920 --> 01:04:22,719
…to his majesty King Charles, his heirs and
successors according to law, so help me God.”
74
01:04:27,639 --> 01:04:32,559
Oh yes, I’m the Great Pretender…
75
01:04:32,840 --> 01:04:41,440
…that the Prince Charles Phillip Arthur George is now become our only lawful and rightful Liege Lord, Charles the Third.
5925
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.