Original subtitles

Hi.

This video is for people who love freedom

and recognise that Common Law is a key component

in making sure the cabal

who want one world government never succeed.

When somebody invented Covid

I went on a journey

to find the best proponents of Common Law

so that I could stay close to them

and help in any way I could.

I didn’t realise

how many different views on Common Law there were

and to my dismay I discovered

that many so called leaders of Common Law

were of the opinion

“it’s my way of the highway”.

I thought at the time

what a shame that was and I still do.

However I was happy to see

that the most mature, professional

& serious players in the Common Law arena

were all respectful of each other

and wouldn’t dream of attacking each others methods of teaching.

I decided that the one I admired the most

was the administration behind the website

Common Law Court.com

and two years later I have no reason to doubt that choice.

Common Law Court.com exists in cyberspace

it isn’t owned by anyone

it is there for We The People of the whole world

to declare without any ambiguity

that we are standing under Common Law.

People say wrongly that the individual

known as John Smith owns Common Law Court

that is totally untrue.

I don’t know this

but he probably owns the domain

but that’s irrelevant

because you and I

could set up a similar domain tomorrow easily.

John Smith is the administrator of the website

and he has individuals help him.

So that I’m completely clear

John Smith is not Common Law Court

you and I and the people are the Common Law Court.

The reason I’m making this 25 minute video

is to cover an important and serious question

which is why do people throw stones at Common Law Court?

Why do people throw the same frequent comments

that to the untrained ear

can do a lot of damage to the Common Law Court?

Well before I make my attempt at answering those questions

I’d like to share with you

what I’ve heard said directly to me,

and while I go through each of these accusations

in the next few minutes

I want you to think

why are there so many accusations

aimed at the Common Law Court,

see if you can figure it out for yourself

before I give you my answer to that at the end.

The first thing that I lost count of hearing

was the repeated complaint that Common Law Court

uses the word registration

when individuals record their birth.

At first I thought it was a joke

but unfortunately at the time

I didn’t know what a Common Law purist was.

Some of my best friends are Common Law purists

but they are all reasonably minded purists.

The reason a purist gets so hot under the collar

about the word registration

is because it means giving power to the monarch or Regis

in the hidden language of the maritime courts.

That Language is called Legalese.

So I asked John Smith

why on earth do you use such a word?

and he told me that the website

uses the Oxford English dictionary, not Legalese

and you can see that clearly stated on the homepage.

The reason for using registration

was because its one of those words

that virtually everyone recognises

as the join here word

and there are very few other words

that are of equal comparison,

so registration as a word stays

and there is a reason given on the homepage.

All reasonably minded individuals

agree on that point however

I was disappointed that there are more than a few

who point blank refuse

to work with Common Law Court

on that single issue.

My message to them is

the enemy is on the beach

and they are killing children

and they wont stop

until the world has no more humans as we recognise left.

So why on earth are we having this conversation

about using one word.

When children’s lives and the future of humanity is at stake

making a fuss about the word registration

has no sane defence.

No sooner had I dusted myself off

from defending the word registration

the attacks started about privacy

where everyones Common Law birth records

were on public display.

The fact is that when you register your details

and get your birth certificate

you can clearly see on your dashboard

a privacy on/off button,

so if you want privacy just click the button.

Have you ever had to justify something

when half way through giving the answer

you can see the next complaint incoming.

By the time you get to answering the third complaint

you will be right in assuming

the individual making the complaint

doesn’t want the answers

they just want out for a hidden reason.

Well that was my thought process in the early days

when I was talking about Common Law Court

especially when the third complaint was thrown at me

that they were just a data mining set up,

using personal data for bond trading

and that they were in breach of GDPR regulations.

Well as complicated an accusation as that sounds

its easy to answer.

The state would love to shut down Common Law Court

but they can’t.

Why?

Because there is no evidence of wrongdoing.

So if anyone has any evidence

that Common Law Court is bond trading or selling data

then let them bring that forward.

Without evidence there is no crime.

When we give credibility to malicious rumours

then all we are doing is assisting the state and hurting the people.

As for GDPR regulations,

that accusation displays a lack of understanding

for what Common Law Court is.

The reason the breaking of GDPR accusation is pointless

is because the living men and women of Common Law Court

are not bound by statutory rules.

A similar accusation to bond trading was,

Is CLC raiding peoples C’estui Que Vie trusts

via their car insurance?

The answer is no.

Most people don’t know this

but all motor insurance claims

are paid via the insurance company

dealing with the treasury for your C’estui Que Vie trust.

The same process is used in Common Law Court motor insurance

but there is no way your trust is accessed by CLC or you

it is just used to pay a claim.

It’s a shame the CLC can’t show you how to access your trust

because if we had full access to our C’estui Que Vie trusts

none of us would ever need to work again,

and it’s something I’m very interested in.

I was getting bored when I heard another complaint

that everything the Common Law Court does

is void because they use Capital letters.

Again I’d like to underline my point

that I am genuinely interested in the impact of capital letters

and the trickery we are all subjected through via legalese.

I’d also like to state that the study of syntax grammar

by my common law purist friends

is a great academic pursuit,

I am fascinated by this subject

and often willingly engage in conversation about it.

However when on the homepage of Common Law Court

you can clearly see the statement

that the Oxford English Dictionary is applied here

and not legalese

then arguing about it in my opinion is a total waste of time.

A complaint that was wrapped in a question aimed at myself

was where does the Common Law Court get its authority from.

The answer to that is a Jury of 12 peers.

Almost every jurisdiction

whether Common Law or from a state

recognises the authority of the people

as superior to any government.

A properly convened Common Law Court cannot be challenged,

that is where the authority comes from.

A big stone that is often thrown at Common Law Court

is perhaps the most disingenuous

it’s the comment where does the money go?

the CLC is just another money grabbing organisation

no different than banks or the state,

they ask why Cruinn accounts are charged an equivalent £10 a month

and where does it go?

Without proper study

they just throw idle comments

that CLC is ripping people off.

All this demonstrates a lack of understanding

of how a business works.

Wait I hear you say

CLC is we the people

& you just said it’s a business,

no I didn’t.

I said individuals who criticise the CLC

often lack business knowledge.

The CLC I have seen is an admin centre

which processes hundreds of declared births every day.

Who does this?

a man or woman sat at a PC.

Who pays the man or woman to sit there?

who pays for their pc?

who pays for the phone?

who pays for the desk they sit at?

who pays for the electricity

to keep them in light and in the warm?

It takes money to run these things

and although its an admin centre

it needs to be run as a business for all of our sakes.

And further to this

I suggest you go to the web page clc-currency.uk

and read where it says

no longer will the government have access to your money and restrict you.

Most awake people know the corruption of government finance

so it beggars belief that the same awake people

criticise the very vehicle that is taking them to freedom.

And if you really want to know where the money goes

its there in plain sight on the page clc-currency.uk

it clearly states that all monies raised

including the £10 equivalent in Cruinn accounts monthly fees

45% to CLC Healthcare

giving free treatment to living men and women

thats free treatment to your loved one with cancer for goodness sake,

20% to CLC education

that’s a way out of government indoctrination camps

otherwise known as state schools for your children,

14% to Common Law Constables

to keep you and I protected from state thugs

and to maintain our freedom

3% to CLC Currency

to ensure we have our savings safe from state control and robbery

3% to CLC Media to ensure we have a reliable source of news

and 10% to other sources

which can ensure we have this structure in place.

Would you believe that some people still wont let that go?

and they complain,

“Yes, but it says the cryptocurrency, the Cruinn,

is backed by gold, precious metals and tangible assets,

so where is the gold stored?”

Now here is where I think, for all of our sakes,

the admin of common law court should draw the line

and here’s why.

If you told the cabal where the CLC gold is

that’s an invitation to march in and confiscate it

and the very detractors asking where was it stored

will then probably be the first to say

“How did they let it get stolen?”

the answer is, by answering your improper question.

There are plenty of trusted places where cryptocurrency

can be used to purchase solid gold

and quickly moved back into crypto in complete privacy.

If the Cruinn gold reserves were asked for,

by withdrawals,

then they are always converted to fiat currency.

So telling the cabal where and who the gold broker is

creates a penalty kick situation

to freeze the money when it is converted into fiat

just before sending it back to the CLC admin.

Its strategic suicide to provide such information

and if it became public

I wouldn’t put any of my funds into it

because the whole system would have become high risk

as a result of telling the cabal where your gold is.

It’s not all about gold either.

if you read the information

it says the Cruinn funds are invested in tangible assets.

Think about that for a minute,

we need admin centres, health centres, education facilities

now if I was running the admin of CLC,

that’s where I’d be looking to invest.

I’m sorry to say this

but a lot of us need to grow up a bit

and become more emotionally mature

before we demand an asset list

of properties and gold invested for us,

we either trust the admin of CLC or we don’t.

It’s equally disingenuous to demand a set of accounts

and that request shows a complete lack of understanding in Common Law.

We are not part of the state or admiralty law

or any cabal law

who insists every living man and woman is enslaved

by making them accountable

and hence producing accounts to them

so that they can rob them with unlawful taxes.

Can you imagine walking into your high street bank

and demanding to know where your money is going.

These very banks are the power system

behind the entire depopulation and control agenda we find ourselves in,

so after having our forefathers sent to needless wars for hundreds of years

and dreadful genocides across generations,

if you don’t trust the admin of CLC to look after your Cruinn account

then stay with the cabal bank

or get together with your neighbour

and start printing your own paper money

hoping that the local conman doesn’t start counterfeiting it,

mint your own gold coins

and again see where that gets you,

or of course you could start bartering the potatoes you’ve grown

for your kids next pair of shoes,

good luck with that.

The next accusation was that John Smith is a government agent

and there is even a video on social media

called John Smith AKA Agent John Smith, Government agent.

It’s an office joke inside the admin at Common Law Court

everyone calls each other Agent Smith or Agent Jones

but the serious side of the accusation

is simply as a smear campaign

nothing more nothing less.

That smear campaign actually developed to;

Is he really called John Smith?

Is that a fake name?

Well, I can tell you,

I actually asked him

and I learned that not only is he really John Smith

but his father was called John Smith as well.

Another smear campaign was that the CLC is affiliated with the Freemasons,

the answer to that is a straight no.

The CLC is not affiliated to anything, t

hey are there to serve the people, end of story.

Have you figured it out yet?

Why there is such a barrage of accusations.

Well, here’s another disingenuous one.

Why did JS and CLC let certain individuals down

by not attending courts with them.

Firstly, at CLC,

to my knowledge there has never been any intention to attend statutory courts.

CLC don’t recognise their jurisdiction and authority

so why would CLC create joinder

by attending and therefore submitting to them.

The only reason a living man or woman standing under Common Law

would go near a statutory court

would be to challenge their authority

and tackle the question of slavery.

Secondly,

the statutory courts would not allow any advocates from CLC in their buildings,

the only people who are allowed in

are solicitors and barristers

and CLC are certainly not any of those.

There is what is known as McKenzie friends,

people who are recognised by statutory courts

to attend with a defendant to assist them in the statutory court process

and as I said, CLC has exposed [as have all Common Law advocates]

that the statutory courts are fraudulent corporate organisations

so why on earth would any living man or woman from CLC

attend their fraudulent courts.

Now having said all that,

the CLC does provide individuals

with the paperwork templates and guidance for living men & women

to defend themselves from the statutory court system

and I have seen many successes with my own eyes to verify that.

Another point to remember

is that CLC is not responsible for you.

You are responsible for you!

CLC has limited resources.

They are men & women just like you and I

with life going on and limited time.

I’m sure John Smith, myself and other people associated with CLC

cannot personally help every individual,

but the CLC system can and does provide

everything someone has to know

to successfully defend themselves from the state.

The same people that scream, “Where does the CLC money go?”

are the same people that say, “Why doesn’t the CLC help more people?”

Am I stating the obvious when I say

that without cashflow,

how on earth can the CLC provide a bigger and better service to us all?

The cabal has deliberately made humanity weak and dependent on them

so that when for example,

CLC gives you documents to help yourself

but doesn’t physically attend the court to help you,

it is natural to complain that you have been let down by CLC,

when the truth is, you should take personal responsibility

and work to regain independence

which, by the way, isn’t easy.

It’s a hard life lesson to detach yourself from the state

and build an independent life.

The proverb is

“Feed a man a fish, you feed him for today.

Teach a man how to fish, you feed him for life”.

CLC is teaching you how to fish

not weakening you by doing it all for you.

Before I leave the accusation that CLC has frequently let people down,

show me one signed contract

that has John Smiths signature

or any trained CLC advocates signature on it

promising to attend a court.

Plus, I heard of one such case last year

and someone was crying that JS didn’t attend court with them

and I knew that JS was extremely ill;

his lady partner thought he was going to die

so let’s cut the man some slack please.

The next complaints were regarding the organisation of Common Law Constables

specifically,

why it is insisted upon that constables record their birth

and reclaim their legal fiction on the CLC website

before they can become Constables?

The reason is simple.

Common Law Court does not care

where or how you and an individual

declare yourself as a living man or woman

and doesn’t care where or how you reclaim your legal fiction,

however, if you are to stand as a Constable in front of the statutory police

and any statutory body

then you simply have to prove that under their laws

you are not impersonating one of their police officers.

Your CLC Constable card carries evidence

that you are a living man or woman

who has ownership of the legal fiction they fraudulently created at your birth.

Also if you are going to stand for your community

as a Common Law Constable

then its pretty obvious that you will be expected

to prove that you stand under Common Law.

Just so we are clear on this point,

an individual can attend a Common Law Constable training

without having their Common Law Birth certificate

or reclaimed legal fiction

so that they can see what it entails,

they have 21 days after the event to record their details

if they wish to become a Constable afterwards.

People ask what are Commissioners

& why have we have ranks in CLC constabulary?

firstly, the people authorised this at hearing in Guilford in 2019,

the ranks are to make sure we act in the interest of the people at all times.

Not individuals going rogue.

Another question is why do you insist the training script

is never changed without permission of Commissioners?

Again, it’s to ensure there is no rogue teaching.

The Common Law Court has been criticised

that CLC constable roll out is too slow.

Well, today we have an automated system

& it can’t be faster than that.

You see if you build anything without a structure

it will fall apart because it has no substance.

I’ve heard it said that individuals

have ordered their CLC card and never received it,

well if you saw the state of the website

being attacked 200 times every 30 minutes

and the fact that the state were doing everything they could

to shut down its banks and any means of revenue

I’m surprised anything got sent out,

but the website was rebuilt over 7 months

and those complaints have gone silent since.

I heard it said that the CLC doesn’t have a structure to support the people,

which made me laugh because,

I think it’s the only one I’ve seen

that actually has a structure.

The admin centre is something to behold.

They have plans there for a health care centre,

plans for education, driving registrations, insurance, passports,

so yes,

they probably have the most advanced Common Law structure in the world.

Saying the CLC has no structure

is an inversion of the truth.

Ask yourself,

especially if you’ve been around the truth movement for a while,

who else do you know practices the demonic use of inversion?

oh yes, The State!

So when you hear inverted accusations,

take a very close look at where that comment came from,

because controlled opposition isn’t far removed

from the mouth of that accuser.

Have you asked yourself yet

why the Common Law Court has all the accusations

and very few accusations are thrown at the other Common Law groups.

What makes CLC so special to get such attention

and are the other groups so good they get little or no complaints?

Dare I suggest it is controlled?

So, after all I’ve said,

why do people throw stones then?

Is there a reason that people in the truth movement can be so edgy and sceptical?

The only defence I can think of

is that society has put them on edge & they trust nobody,

it’s a burden being awake

knowing what’s happening and about to happen

and having the asleep normals

look at us like weird conspiracy theorists.

There’s a more likely explanation for throwing stones at CLC

and that’s simple jealousy

or wanting to follow their own agenda.

We cant afford to work in opposite directions

theres nothing wrong with having different Common Law organisations

in fact it’s a great idea

but for goodness sake

lets edify each other and not fight like rats in a cage

that’s exactly what the cabal wants.

In fact, if you want to find controlled opposition

or a fat ego or a jealous fool

or someone who never does any real genuine research

you’ll find them throwing stones at the CLC.

There’s a considerable amount

of overblown ego’s out there in the truth movement

and my only comment to that is

we all need reminding that we are all on same side,

we are not each other’s enemies

we are not all government agents or shills

so lets put our energy on building together

instead of apart.

I was involved in the rebuilding from the ground up of the CLC website

and an internet security expert who was making sure the site was safe from attacks

showed me that there was a hacking attempt on the CLC site

an average of 200 times every 30 minutes

400 times an hour.

The state hate it.

Why?

Because it threatens their tyranny

over sleeping living men and women

and they are desperate for them to not be woken up

by websites such as Common Law Court.

There are 206 countries and territories on our planet

and CLC is in over 190 of them,

and CLC has been around, at the time of this video,

for 5 years.

The Common Law Court is right over the target of the cabal run governments

and fraudulent institutions

I suggest this is why

there are so many malicious and false statements made about it.

The sheer weight of relentless attacks on its credibility tell me at least

that this is a controlled agenda

to destroy the reputation of the CLC.

The CLC has a structure and vision

not seen anywhere in the world.

I can’t see where any other organisation has provided this.

The CLC has individuals recording their details

in 190 of the 206 countries of the world,

they are a clear record for anyone to declare their position

as a living man or woman

who has reclaimed their legal fiction.

The CLC provides a whole array of documentation

to separate yourself from state control.

The CLC provides car registration plates

and car insurance away from the state,

they provide common law passports,

they have common law healthcare

and common law education

and common law media,

the clc is continually pushing for yours and my freedom.

Is it any surprise that the state want CLC to go away?

and all they can do is get controlled opposition

to throw sand in our eyes.

This is why so many stones are thrown at CLC

and we all should be ready to defend it

as by doing so we are defending ourselves.

Now for those of us that are reasonable minded

I ask you to share this video

with anyone who hears any of these stories

and encourage them to focus on building communities

instead of helping the state by destroying them.

So thanks for listening.

Remember we are all on the same side

and we need to be working together

supporting each other

and circling the wagons in our own communities

Together.