All language subtitles for The.Judgement.2021.DUTCH.1080p.WEBRip.x264.AAC5.1

Downloaded from
YTS.MX

Official YIFY movies site:
YTS.MX

In the name of the Father,
the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Amen.

We are gathered here
in memory of...

Jacqueline Jeantina Eugenia
Gerarda Wittenberg-Willemen.

Widow of Willem Cornelis Wittenberg.

A memory of an intensely involved
and caring person...

and to an almost
incomprehensible event.

A murder.

Mr Louwes, what
do you expect from today?

Sure.

- What do you expect from the verdict?
- Do you still believe in it?

Mr Louwes, are you nervous?

Mr Louwes.

- What will you hear today?
- Eh, acquittal of course.

I still can't believe it.
- No.

She was such a sweet person. -Yes.

- Michael must be having a hard time.
- Yes, she was like a mother to him.

Ladies and gentlemen, the court.

Then you ask yourself: are the police
doing anything? I live opposite her.

No one has been at the door.
- The family also doesn't know anything.

She was killed on Thursday and
they didn't find her until Saturday.

In the living room.

The court finds proven...

that the accused intentionally and
premeditatedly assaulted the victim...

No, I haven't, ma'am.
- Let me finish.

...deprived of life.

Sorry for your loss.

- My condolences to you too...
- We are friends of the family.

Who was that?

Jaqueline's
financial advisor, Louwes.

The verdict therefore reads: the court
maintains, with improvement of grounds..

the judgment of the Court of Appeal
in Arnhem of 22 December 2000.

The court orders the arrest of
the accused.

You just continue with all the
falsified arguments of the police.

Mister Louwes...

You wipe everything away.

I understand your emotion,
but I haven't finished speaking yet.

You have two weeks to appeal to
the Supreme Court of the Netherlands.

- You know you are wrong.
- Are you coming with me?

No, I'm not coming. No, I'm going...

I'm not going. Damn.

The photos and the cameras
are now stopped.

The Judgement

2 years earlier

Yes, but could you please
put me through?

How so? I didn't come up with it.

I'm just stating the facts.
The facts, yes.

Haan, could it be a little quieter?

How do I get that information?
I'm not going to tell you that

Never heard of source protection?

Hello?

Hello?

Dicknose

- Did you catch that guy yet?
- No, the same all the time.

I ask for comments,
they tell me how I got that information.

I can't say that and so on.
They don't even put me through.

- And your source has nothing on paper?
- No.

Do you like soup? -No thanks.

Bas, do you like soup? -Delicious.

Maybe a colleague can confirm? -Hey.

Do you really think he will be
Prime Minister?

I'd be surprised if he doesn't.

But with whom can he form a coalition?

Melkert and Dijkstal can
drink his blood.

Rosenmöller and De Graaf
cannot sell it to their supporters.

- Balkenende?
- Yes, the CDA would be an option.

And what do you think, Bas?

Bizarre.

What?

Do you have something nice for me?

Who are those people,
that Waisvisz couple?

Involved citizens.

That attorney will file a review request
based on their investigation.

They are handwriting experts.

They work a lot for the judiciary,
but they do this themselves.

Yes.
And now you want...

Find out if it's correct.
If it is true...

If that knife cannot
be the murder weapon

then L. is
innocently imprisoned.

Yes, but that story
is already in Trouw.

Do you hear anything?

Have you read
anything else about it?

Apparently it wasn't picked up.

Because everyone is
busy with those polls.

If true, someone
innocent is incarcerated.

- You already said that.
- Yes, but...

It is well. It's okay.

You may.

According to Maurice de Hond,
the LPF will be the largest...

in the parliamentary elections.

Our question today: is Pim Fortuyn a
good prime minister? Good afternoon...

- Good day.
- Hello, Ed Waisvisz.

- I'm Wanda.
- Bas Haan.

See what you can do with it.
Our report is on top.

This is from the criminal file.
How did you get that?

Van Louwes' lawyer.
We are working with him now.

Do you also have this digitally?
- Uh-uh.

We are not into modern frills.

Can I copy it and show it
to someone else?

Okay.

And...

There was also another suspect.

Michaël de Jong, the widow's handyman.
He lied about his alibi.

And he had knowledge about the
perpetrator.

He knew the body was in the living room
and told people that...

at her own funeral.

He's building a case
against the suspect...

which he eventually brings to court.

Yet the public prosecutor is not a
crime fighter, as in American films.

In the Dutch legal system,
the Public Prosecution Service is…

unlike in most neighboring countries...

both truth finder and crook catcher.

Ladies and gentlemen,
in the back someone has just joined us.

Network Editor, Bas Haan.
Specialized in our rule of law.

And not so very long ago student,
as yourself.

- Hey, Bas.
- Peter.

What did you bring again?

I'm not saying anything,
you have to look at it cleanly.

It's a box,
that's as far as I dare go.

That's why I always ask you.

You don't believe that, do you?

Look here.

Short time after the robbery
and at a short distance from the house.

In fact, three days later
and a mile away.

The knife is not properly secured,
has been in the rain for days...

and is linked to Louwes
via a very dubious odor test.

In addition, the blade does not
match the depth of the stab wounds.

In nine sentences they explained in
Arnhem why Louwes is the perpetrator.

And everything is
linked to that knife.

And that telephone tower.

- I'm going after that too.
- And the other suspect?

- The handyman?
- Yes, are you going after that?

No

But that's a suspect, right?

We shouldn't play judge

let alone make some
handyman a suspect.

Louwes has been convicted.
There is a verdict. I can test that.

If that doesn't work,
we can say something

about the way the
justice system works.

Hmm, okay. How long do you need?

Come on, broadcast schedule, budget...
How long?

Fortuyn was shot.

He's laying back here, neatly dressed.

He's been shot in the head
and he's laying with his feet crossed...

He dropped to his knees
and fell backwards.

- Where is it?
- That's here.

A parking space at 3FM. No idea who...

I meet upset employees of Ruud de Wild..
They are shaken...

- Bas Haan.
- Ernest Louwes.

- Thank you for welcoming me.
- Wanda said you can be trusted.

Hopefully Wanda is too.

The third house from the right.

I live there.

- Your house is opposite?
- With that green door.

Bizarre.

Among the items I received from
Mrs. Waisvisz was this.

That's my diary.
Yes, I typed everything out.

- Could I read it?
- Yes of course.

You have to if you believe in my cause.

Everything is in there. I wrote
everything down, from the beginning.

Good.

I want to start with the court's
assessment of the facts.

The most important
evidence piece: the knife

has already been disproved
by the Waisvisz family.

- That leaves...
- The telephone tower.

Yes.
Can you tell me more about that?

Louwes says he was at Het Harde
when he called Mrs Wittenberg.

Thirty kilometers from Deventer.

He was with her that morning.

She asked how much she could donate
to the church tax-free.

He reported that from the car
at 8:36 pm that evening.

In 16 seconds?

With Ernest. You wanted to know how
much you could donate. 1750 guilders.

Yes, 1750.
Sorry, I'm in the car, so I'll be brief.

Yes. See you soon.

14 seconds.

- No.
- Come on, Rein. It's possible right?

No one believes that
the knife is the weapon.

It is possible, but it
doesn't have to.

That telephone mast is almost
in that woman's backyard.

How do you explain that?

Increased radio propagation.

- Increased what?
- Radio propagation.

Sometimes a signal drifts.
I spoke to an expert...

It's okay, Bas.

- Coffee?
- Please.

You have never seen this?

Nee.

Here it is.

The police in Deventer
questioned me about

the smell identification
test of the knife.

They asked me for a kind of
second opinion.

And I then indicated by letter what was
unclear about the test execution.

Don't look into the camera

and try to incorporate the questions
into your answers.

First the smell test and then
point by point.

But in court you stated that you found
the smell test strong evidence.

Yes, because the reports
I saw then were in order.

- Ready?
- Er, yes.

It looks like they used that letter...

to improve the original reports.

- Did they cheat?
- Yes.

Mister van Koppen, as an expert in the
field of miscarriages of justice

how do you view
the conviction of Ernest L.?

If you put the reports side by side,
the numbers don't match.

There are weird dates.
Subsequent reports were drawn up.

It is unclear where
the knife was kept and stored.

And then you are not
allowed to do a sorting test.

Dog handlers are expected
to check this. That didn't happen.

Nice.

Just a voice-over and the presentation
text for Aart and we're good to go.

Good job, Haan.
This is going to cause quite a stir.

Ernest L. was sentenced to 12 years in
prison for murder in Deventer.

It now appears with
very questionable evidence.

After his conviction on appeal

an independent agency conducted
an investigation...

and came with damning conclusions about…

If the bookkeeper didn't do it,
then who did?

Didn't that widow have a butler?

Ah, there he is. Louwes?

Louwes? Mister Louwes?

Are you happy that your
case is being reviewed?

Come on. Watch your head.
Watch out guys. Watch out, watch out.

Watch your fingers.

Bas, what are you doing man?

Goddamn.

Here it is.

Papa.

Hey honey.

- I missed you so much.
- Oh, baby.

Oh, honey, how
glad I am to see you.

Oh, honey. You're out, honey.

- Honey. We won.
- Ernest.

- I'll see you later.
- Yes, I'll see you later.

Bye, honey.

Sorry.

A deal is a deal.
You have every right to the scoop.

I wouldn't be here without you.

How did you pass the time,
those three years?

It was fine at first, but I haven't done
anything in the last few months.

Also unable to do anything.

- One, close.
- Attention, title Louwes.

I wrote a little, I read a lot.

But at some point that
doesn't work anymore.

Interesting, I would expect it the
other way around

At first you think: I'm innocent,
I'll never get out of here, but...

Well, I've always believed it would
turn out alright.

That might sound strange
considering it took that long

but I've always believed that.

Perhaps a strange thought, because it
isn't my fault, but someone else's.

And that I happen to be
sitting here today.

- Enjoy your meal.
- Thank you.

Thank you.

Proud?

Don't act like you don't understand me,
asshole.

First day of review

Good luck.

Ladies and gentlemen, the court.

Welcome, ladies and gentlemen.

You can sit down.

Mr. Louwes, we are here to
review your case.

A case that is now known in the media
as the Deventer murder case.

After the knife evidence fell apart,
supporting evidence also lost its power.

Like the telephone conversation via the
mobile phone mast in Deventer...

that made probable that the suspect was
in Deventer around the murder.

The court in Arnhem could therefore not
have come to proven statement...

on the present evidence.

Also not if the evidence is considered
in conjunction with other clues.

However, another NFI report came to my
attention this morning.

And it concerns the
result of a DNA test.

This research shows...

that Mr. Louwes' DNA was found
on the victim's clothing.

Namely on the blouse Mrs. Wittenberg
was wearing when she was murdered.

I can't say exactly what the situation
is with the DNA. I just received it.

And I still have to dig into
its consequences.

New DNA Evidence?

The details will come
the next session day.

In a month and a half.

That interview with
Louwes at home is tonight.

Louwes visited the widow
on the morning of the murder

the OM knows that.

If he put a hand on her shoulder,
there's already DNA.

- So just broadcast?
- Sure.

The interview is only about
Louwes' experience

what it is like to be free again.

- Really very touching.
- I'll get the tissues ready.

Today the revision case against
Ernest Louwes started in Den Bosch.

Before the trial started, we spoke with
Louwes about this special case...

and his bizarre years in prison.
Bas Haan reports.

You are free, of course

But your life has basically
become miserable.

And that often feels very awful.

Mich?

And that is sometimes difficult.

Mich, come. Louwes is on TV.

It would be best if the perpetrator
is quickly arrested.

So everyone knows I have
nothing to do with it.

Of course that would be the...
the most, most beautiful thing.

That man gives me the creeps.

I would very much
like to have that, yes.

Okay, then we'll talk about that.

- Yes.
- Peter R. de Vries.

Um, oh no, sorry. I'll call you
back in a minute.

- What's that?
- A fax from Peter R. de Vries.

He also watched last night.
And how annoyed he got...

that I didn't mention

the pretty spectacular news...

that Louwes' DNA was found
on the blouse of the widow.

Yes, he's right, isn't he?
You didn't report it, did you?

Vanity, Bas.

Fuck.

We found DNA from Mr. Louwes...

in places that correspond with
how the victim was killed.

Mrs. Wittenberg was not only stabbed,
but also strangled.

It involves material near the
broken ribs. The killer used force.

And these red-pink spots

eventually turned out to be
facial foundation.

Which was reasonably spread by the
killer during the strangling.

Apart from these contact traces

we also found this
stain in the collar...

with the DNA of Mr. Louwes.
And this is blood.

Except that it takes liquid blood...

we cannot determine with 100%
certainty how that blood got there.

But all these traces support
the hypothesis that

the DNA was transferred
during the crime.

And again: all this DNA
comes from Mr. Louwes.

Mr. Louwes.
Are you nervous for today?

Mr Louwes, are you nervous?
What do you expect from the verdict?

Mr Louwes,

what are you
going to hear today?

Er, acquittal of course.

Are you sure?

Yes. Yeah, I've always assumed that,
so uh... that's for sure, yes.

Yet last week the judiciary
made many people doubt.

You would be a top actor
who makes everything up.

Yes, but well, the only top actor
is the OM itself.

They did get me convicted once, so...

What if
the verdict today reads: guilty?

But it's not like that.

I have to go. Will I see you later?

This means that the court finds proven..

that the accused intentionally and
premeditatedly assaulted the victim...

- I haven't, ma'am.
- Let me finish.

...deprived of life. The court orders
the arrest of the accused.

- No no no.
- The ruling...

- I'm not getting picked up again.
- The court rules...

The court maintains,
under improvement of grounds...

the judgment of the Court of Appeal
in Arnhem of 22 December 2000.

The court orders imprisonment.

You just continue with all the
falsified arguments of the police.

You just wipe everything away.

You are wiping everything away.

I understand your emotion,
but I haven't finished speaking yet.

If you disagree with the ruling

you have two weeks to appeal to the
Supreme Court of the Netherlands.

- You know you are wrong.
- Are you coming with me?

No, I'm not coming. No, I'm going...

I'm not... Damn it.

The cameras are now…

The photos and the cameras
are now stopped.

You can't just act that.
Right, Bas?

Oh come on, man.
You have eyes in your head, right?

He didn't do it,
can't you feel it?

His blood was in the collar,
but we feel he didn't do it.

This was the news, good evening.

Come on.

So, folks. You know there's a
broadcast tonight, right?

See you later.

So...

No acquittal.

That's too bad.

- Better luck next time.
- What do you mean?

- Well, it's done.
- Finished?

I think someone just said that the
blood in the collar can't be ignored.

Rein only said that
a feeling isn't news.

Well, we can't go on feeling.

Whoa, wait. There are still
plenty of questions, aren't there?

- Real questions.
- Bas...

One: they tampered
with the evidence before

with the reporting
on the knife earlier

And that blouse was
administratively lost for a while.

Two: there is no DNA from Louwes
under the nails of the widow.

While Knoops rightly argued that
this would be the case in a struggle.

Three: new facts have come to light.

But nobody knows enough about
DNA to judge them.

- Bas...
- It's our job as journalists...

It's my job to make a
whole program every night.

I can't allow more time and budget with
those facts and the conviction.

I can't justify it!

Management won't have it.

Until new developments come around,
Deventer is on the back burner.

- There is also other news.
- You mean that stranded sperm whale.

Bas... Take off the afternoon.
Cool down.

But after that it's over.

Finished.

Boy oh boy.

Evelien?

Bas.

Glad you wanted to come.

Yeah, I didn't know
it was so public here.

Top criminals also meet
in roadside restaurants.

Don't worry, I'm not going to
ask any difficult questions.

I just wanted to know
more about that

DNA course you followed
at the Justice Department.

They don't invite me.

If I tell everything I heard,
I'll violate my duty of confidentiality.

But isn't it a general course,
the use of DNA in criminal cases?

- Would you like to order something?
- A regular coffee, please.

A cappuccino.

- I want absolute anonymity.
- I guarantee it.

No one will ever find out
that you talked to me

no matter what you say.

The Public Prosecution Service and the
NFI have withheld DNA evidence.

As a result, an innocent man
is now incarcerated.

Ernest Louwes?

Kees B.

Schiedam park murder.

Succes.

Five, four, three...

Four past eight. This is Network.

Incriminating evidence was withheld in
the Schiedam park murder

How the judiciary wanted to keep an
innocent prisoner locked up for life.

A report by Bas Haan.

Hey, man, good day.

A package for you.

Thank you.

Hey

Bad conscience?

Make some room.

Guys what...

Congratulations on your first scoop
as a reporter.

Thank you.

Guys...

Well, blow, Haan.

Speech.

Cake?

Well, please.

I was at a meeting of Maurice de Hond
this morning.

- More seats for Wilders?
- No.

He had polled the effect of Schiedam on
our confidence in the rule of law.

- I'm guessing it had dropped.
- Dramatic.

But the OM is working on improvement.

Yes

Schiedam was only the start,
he is know looking at Deventer.

- Maurice?
- Hmhm.

- At Deventer?
- Yes.

He claims to have a lot of new evidence
that exonerates Louwes.

Seriously?

Did he mention what he found?

Do you know who his source is?

- Does he have a new witness?
- I didn't ask.

Tonight he will sit at Matthijs.

Maurice de Hond, welcome.

Polls are your business.

- Yes.
- You started another campaign today.

You would like to review and reopen the
Deventer murder case of 1999.

Why?

Well, I'm just a civilian too.

And as a citizen,
I am interested in the rule of law.

And in 2003 or 2004, Ernest Louwes
was convicted in the third instance...

after he was first released
by the Supreme Court

and when I saw that on TV,
my stomach turned.

After that I received all sorts of
information from people close to Louwes.

I couldn't believe what I read. This
couldn't happen in this country.

The Netherlands has a constitution.
I couldn't believe it.

Only until the Schiedam park murder
came on TV earlier this year

First on Netwerk, but more importantly
later in the report of OM.

Kees B. was unjustly
imprisoned for murder.

It's kind of a mix between
"Keystone Cops"...

with Inspector Clouseau from "The
Pink Panther" and Mr Bean.

Isn't that part of the excitement?

With the Schiedam case you see
how many mistakes...

He just keeps linking those cases.

Also on his site.

Here.

Schiedam, Deventer.

And here. But that in itself
isn't so illogical, is it?

Because they messed up in Schiedam,
they also screwed up Deventer?

That is no argument,
that's bullshit.

Besides, in Schiedam the withheld DNA
proved Kees B.'s innocence...

while in Deventer the found
DNA proves Louwes' guilt.

But many people doubt
whether Louwes did it.

With all due respect, Gerda, those
people don't know fuck all, don't they?

Well, Maurice
is not just anyone.

This isn't a poll,
it's a murder case.

What?

Second chances are
rare in our business.

Not so long ago you also
had doubts about Louwes.

That's right.

Schiedam was a crash course in DNA.
Conclusion: DNA, no way around it.

That blood in that collar is a fact,
and that blood belongs to Louwes.

Unless the blood is fraudulent.

According to Louwes
the evidence has been faked.

But Maurice has no hard proof of that.

I took a good look.

So?

- No news?
- Gerda.

Maurice is just a celebrity
with an opinion.

Okay.

On principle, you shouldn't
prune in winter.

The plant needs to lose moisture.

If you prune too much,
you will get fungus.

Good afternoon.

Good afternoon.

- Hello?
- Are you Meike Wittermans?

- The handyman's girlfriend?
- Handyman?

Yes, from Widow Wittenberg.

Did you see this, man?
They are calling you the handyman.

What is this all about?

- I don't quite understand...
- We just want to ask some questions.

Things that are unclear.

At the time, you and your husband
were questioned by the police

And made contradictory statements about
the time at which Michael came home.

- Right?
- Yes, that was a mistake, yes.

A mistake?

Yes, a mistake, yes.

Can you precisely remember where
you wife was last Tuesday at 20:30?

There was no murder that night.

No, exactly.

And we had nothing to do with
that murder, so why would I remember?

I've already explained all this.

You do not have to be scared.
We can take you to a safe place.

Who are you?

Can you identify yourself?

Be honest.

Wouldn't it be nice if you could throw
that burden off your shoulders?

- Come clean
- You can't just show up at my work.

That was the whole plan.

If he's not here,
you can talk freely.

Ma'am, come with us.

We can protect you.

- He can't touch you.
- What do you think?

We have nothing to do with this case.
Can you get out of here now?

I'm calling the police.
The real police.

Okay.

Who do you actually work for?

Maurice has been invited by the
President of the Board of Attorneys...

to personally explain his actions and
doubts in the Deventer murder case.

What?

How did he manage that?

I also don't understand.

Do you think I can talk to Brouwer
about my parking tickets?

Then you first have to appear
on 'De Wereld Draait Door'

It's all PR. Restore the trust in the
law; citizens speak up.

But preferably a citizen
who works in media, please.

Thanks to us, huh.
Thanks to us.

It's news... by now.

And the news just came out.

Good morning, mister De Hond.

You have just come from a meeting with
the boss of the judiciary. About what?

Yes, about the Deventer
murder case...

and the fact that the wrong
perpetrator is incarcerated.

And that we now know, at least we do,
who the real perpetrator is.

You know it.
Does he know it too?

Well, he knows what I know.

Of course it isn't easy to
immediately come out and say: it is so.

The fact that the research
is reopened indicates...

that they have
sufficient doubts...

about whether they have done the right
thing in the past.

- He is quite confident in himself.
- Quite?

He already has
the fucking culprit.

What now?

On to casa 'De Hond'.

Mr. De Hond.
What do you expect law enforcement to do

with the incriminating information
you unearthed about the handyman?

I only ask for a proper investigation.
I'm not condemning that man yet.

I think for 99.99% if not a
100% that he did it...

but I'm not a judge.

My only responsibility with
the information is to say:

Anyone who
reads this information...

thinks more research should be done.

Because if only two of my fifteen
hypotheses are true, he's the culprit.

Is it him?

Yes, 100% sure.

- That's tunnel vision.
- No.

He has not yet been convicted.

But I'm not a judge.

You are also not a detective. And can't
read the pieces as a detective.

Your are convinced. Are you allowed to
determine that it is him?

No, I can't say to him:
You get twelve years.

I may say, That's my... I mean, why not?
He's it, 100% sure.

100%.

100%?

- That's what he said?
- Yes.

- And we have that exclusively?
- Yes but...

Yes, but under embargo?

As soon as the OM comes
up with something, we can go.

So we have agreed
with Maurice... But...

But?

It's quite an accusation.

Er, press release from the OM.

At the request of the
Board of Attorneys...

an exploratory investigation has started
into the Deventer murder case.

What?

An exploratory investigation?
There is no such thing.

Well, yes, now there is.

And it's the OM,
so we're allowed.

Yes, but without that
quote about the handyman.

Sorry?

Someone is accused of murder

without any hard evidence.

You elicited that
statement from him yourself.

That's why I'm
going to block it.

Bas, this is news.

You can't just accuse someone of
murder on TV. Maurice...

Maurice is just a celebrity
with an opinion, yes.

But if the judicial system
takes him seriously...

and even starts an
exploratory investigation...

Something which, according to you,
has never happened yet.

...then that's news.

I'm only asking for a
proper investigation.

I'm not judging that man today.

I think 99.99% if not 100%
that he did it...

but I'm not a judge.

My only job with
the information is to say:

Anyone who
reads the information...

thinks more research should be done.

Because if only two of my fifteen
hypotheses are true, he's the culprit.

Is it him?

Yes, 100% sure.

That's tunnel vision.

Come here. Hey, come here.

Hello, this is Michaël and
Meike's answering machine.

We aren't in at the moment, but leave
a message after the beep. Thank you.

Hey, Michael, pick up then,
you filthy retard.

I hope they also strangle you...

like you strangled
that old woman.

You cowardly bastard.

You too, Meike, you dirty whore.

Hello, this is the answering machine...

Bas.

Did you read it?

De Telegraaf, Volkskrant, AD,
all on the front page.

Congratulations man.

Goddamnit.

He says Michael van J. probably did it.

That man has a letter in which the
judiciary says: You are not a suspect.

Can a citizen actually do that?

Shouldn't you be
happy that the judiciary investigates

and just leave it them?

No, the point is: why did the
judiciary start to investigate?

Why have they never investigated
it in Schiedam?

Apparently the judiciary only
moves under hard pressure.

- But they are moving now.
- The point is why...

because the piece on my website
has been sent to the OM.

We said: This is our proof,
go do something.

But they are busy now. Why don't you
keep a low profile for now?

It is of course not in the interest
of the judges, the OM, the judiciary...

to say now: Louwes is not it
and the other one might be.

Because then it will be a
bigger scandal than Schiedam.

Mich... Maybe we should consider what
that lawyer said: give an interview.

No.

I'm not going to do that.

Really.

But there's also the 1% chance,
which you mention yourself...

that Michael didn't do it.
Then you caused quite something.

- Then I will bear the consequences.
- They can go very far.

We'll see.

What's the matter with that guy?

Maurice is on campaign.
It's not about the content.

It's about the PR.

Not to be right,
but to get his right.

Last month Brouwer was his best friend,
now he is part of the plot.

Brouwer actually hoisted
him on the shield.

Not just Brouwer, right?

If I remember correctly,
Maurice also got a lot...

of airtime on a certain
current affairs program.

"It's the handyman."

'100% sure.'

Okay. Second chance, very good,
one more time then.

This time all the way.
Everything and everyone.

Not just what Maurice does.
Every fart from that man is covered.

I was just looking for you.
Press release OM, just came in.

Interim conclusion
exploratory investigation:

five additional contact traces...

and a trail of blood, all from Louwes.

- Do you have to go?
- No, I'm going to smoke.

- Outside?
- Some bore has complained.

That bloody smoking ban...

So it says nothing about
Michael de Jong.

I can already hear Maurice calling it:
cover up.

Can I conclude from
this that you are now...

investigating the handyman,
and not just Louwes?

That's what I said.
The whole story, everything.

And how long do you need for that?

The whole story, checking everything
from Maurice about the handyman...

Louwes one more time...

- Two, three...
- ...weeks.

...months.

But what if Maurice
turns out to be right?

If he has the facts on his side, I'll
carry him around on a silver shield.

100% sure.

I'll ignore the cynicism for now.
But we don't have broadcast.

Of course. You must also dare
to broadcast your faults.

Bas, it is not
a question of daring.

It is journalistic suicide.

So it's open road for circus
De Hond then? I believe it's our job...

Oh my gosh, not again.

Saint Bas.

Do you think
that the handyman did it?

Don't know. I don't think so.

Two months.

Drug addict.

Benefit fraudster.

Hit rock bottom.

Debts as a result of
very high spending patterns.

Perpetrator knowledge.

He and his girlfriend would have
lied about their alibis.

And then this one.

Michael was a patient of psychiatrist
Wittenberg, the husband of the widow.

Because of tantrums.

- How did he get all this information?
- From witnesses.

Because of the publicity,
everyone approaches him.

People who suddenly remember everything
after seven years, often anonymously.

Lots of facts, but no sources.
It cannot be checked directly.

It's a lot.
There must be some truth to it, right?

Yes but what?

There's nothing in it that
makes him a murderer.

But okay.

The handyman did have a motive,
according to Maurice.

Louwes not according to the judges.
Here.

"The handyman was in the
widow's original will...

with a tax-free legacy
of 50,000 guilders...

which was lowered in the new will
ten days before the murder...

to 25,000 guilders.

That's why, and
because of debts...

he would have killed her
in a drunken brawl.'

According to Maurice.

Not known to you? In no registry?

No theft, benefit fraud,
drunk driving, whatever?

Can I quote you on that? Super.

- Here.
- Ah, thank you.

What is that?

- You know that, right?
- Ah, that adoption thingy.

Yes.

Can you picture it?

And can I get that woman too, hm?

If I get that man too.

Come here.

- Are you OK?
- Yes.

- Shall I go to the girls?
- No, I'm coming.

Hey, come here.
Well done.

There's nothing wrong. Yes, good, good.

Well done.

Very good, very good.

Hey, hey, sst.

- Mich?
- Yes, what?

- We have to do something.
- Yes, what then?

I think we need to
talk to that journalist.

But then I have to go
on TV to defend myself.

That man sends private investigators
to my work.

Then I have to tell on TV
how I got that perpetrator knowledge.

- Jan Vlug.
- Good afternoon, Mr Vlug.

- Who am I speaking to?
- With Bas Haan.

Bas Haan.

I would like to speak with a
client of you, Michael de Jong.

I can not reach him.

Oh, so you thought,
let me call his lawyer?

- I assume you can reach him.
- He doesn't want to speak to you.

Hello.

Did anything happen today?

Mr Haan, let me be clear.

According to me and my client,
you are part of the Mr. De Hond group.

You have made more than
ten broadcasts about this case.

And in the last one, Mr. De Hond
got to call my client a murderer...

in front of the whole nation.

'100% sure.'

I understand your reaction,
but I only care about the facts.

I can't investigate a lot,
without his explanation.

You wanted to speak to me?

Sit down.

I'm not judging anyone,
but given all the media attention...

it may be in your client's interest
to highlight his side of the story.

First you make his life hell
and now he has to tell his story...

so that you have your next broadcast.

It must be weird, huh,
all that stuff in the media.

Pf. It's a nightmare.

And especially for Meike.

Maurice's accusations about you
are not nothing...

No, but that man is insane you know.

I would like to point out that
Michael and his girlfriend...

are very fond of their privacy.

These are people who don't need
or want to be in the picture.

Unlike some others.

Those people exist, Mr. Haan.

Personally, I understand them very
well. Better than you probably think.

But as long as they don't defend
themselves, Maurice can shoot freely.

For the last time...

My clients don't want to answer for
something they have no part in.

And for Mr. De Hond, he will
soon have to answer for himself...

when I sue him for libel.

Bye Mr. Haan.

Shit.

Shit, shit, shit.

There are customers of
ours who would rather...

not have you come
to them anymore.

Who?

Customers.

Have I lost my job?

Who are you?

Who are you?

Who are you?

Leave us alone.

Leave me alone.

How is it going?

It has been a long time.

Long time, indeed.

Good to have you here.

A lot of people are sticking up
for me now...

but you were one of the first
to believe and stand up for me.

I've dived into the matter again.

I've put everything back together.

You were with Mrs. Wittenberg
the morning of the murder.

In your diary you write
that she was wearing something red.

"I can't remember whether it was a dress
or a suit, but the color was red."

But the blouse she wore when she
was killed, was white.

Yes...

You always said the DNA got on her
blouse during your visit that morning.

What I don't understand,
is how it got on that white blouse.

Wasn't she wearing something red?

And speaking of that white blouse...

That blood in the collar,
how did they get it?

Um, I donated blood in 1999.

- In my cell, for a DNA profile.
- Where is that written down?

I must have read over it.

I could hardly have
written everything down.

123 typed pages...

of literally every detail
since your arrest.

And then they come into
your cell, take your blood,

and you don't write that down?

In '99 they put my DNA profile
in the database.

That profile required blood.
Then they must have taken it, right?

It wasn't until 2003 that a DNA profile
was made of you, for your review.

- With a cotton swab, in your cheek.
- You're not listening.

I am listening. You say that
blood was drawn in 1999...

to commit fraud with in 2003.

Do they always hold back some blood in
case someone's first conviction fails?

How can you be sure that no
blood has been drawn?

Everything in my case is counterfeit.
Bas!

Everything.

Bas, everything!

Bas!

- Hi.
- I do not have that much time.

It's lunch break
and my boss is strict.

I just have a few questions.

You're not
recording it, are you?

This is as off the
record as it gets.

Really?

Yes, okay. Shall we
just stand there for a while?

Yes.

Actually, I already know a lot.

I'm mainly looking for confirmation
of two things.

A new will was drawn up
ten days before the murder...

in which Louwes becomes
executor of the widow...

and president of a foundation that
manages her millions after her death.

Sorry, I really can't do this.

I thought it would be more about
what I thought of Louwes.

Don't worry, no one will ever
find out about this, I guarantee it.

My word is everything, otherwise
no one will ever talk to me again.

Everything is so specific.
It can only come from me.

It can come from a variety of sources.
No one knows if you work for justice...

or with an involved lawyer,
notary, insurer or Louwes' office.

- Or that you know someone there.
- When you have so much choice...

Listen.

You agreed to this meeting because
things don't sit well with you, right?

Sorry, I shouldn't have...
I shouldn't have come.

You don't necessarily have to talk.
There are also other ways to…

Maybe you know someone
who would like to talk.

This is the knife with which
Michael de Jong stabbed the widow.

With a blade of ten centimeters.

I'll show it here. Ten centimeters.

Michael de Jong killed
the widow with five stabs.

According to expert research...

I uh... found this one.

Get rid of it.

Mr. Vlug, Bas Haan.

Again, yes.

No, I understand that, but you
can propose it to them, can't you?

In a place they choose, without a
camera, in your presence.

I understand.

Yes.

Okay.

Thank you, Maurice.

Michael?

This is Bas Haan.

I know you know my name and
you don't want to talk to me.

And I understand that.

Michael?

Give me a chance.

You get to tell your whole story,
primetime.

Michael.

I'll leave my card here for you.

No sender.

You know whose it is?

I can't say that.

Only that
it left me with a proper cold.

Holy shit.

- Are we shooting?
- Just a moment.

Professor Van Mourik.

As an inheritance
law specialist...

what do you think about
Louwes' letter to the notary...

two months prior to the murder?

Louwes asks the notary to
put in the draft will...

that he becomes the sole director
of a foundation...

which manages all assets
after her death.

And that he does not have to
appoint fellow directors.

In short: that he is the sole ruler
of the wealth...

and can do with it
whatever he pleases.

And he was already working on that
two months before the murder.

Apparently, yes.

But that is not how it turned out
in the final will.

That notary probably smelled a fuse
and thought: we're not going to do that.

That is why Louwes
is ultimately forced

to appoint two
fellow directors?

It strongly resembles that.

But he then chose two colleagues
from his office...

whom he made excited with money
and goods from the foundation...

at least this is what they
declared to the police.

What do you think of that?

The combination of facts...

also that he was trying to
transfer money to a private account...

that leads very clearly in the
direction of Louwes.

You targeted the widow's money,
but you handled it stupidly.

Hey, Meike.

- You better leave that curtain closed.
- It's still there, though.

- I'm going to call the police.
- And then?

You already know what they're
going to say, right?

Well, ma'am, what does he do?

Yes, if he doesn't do anything, then
uh... then we can't do anything either.

Because you can just stand there.

Yeah, no, it's uh...

We can maybe drive by later...

But we are not a private police,
we have to guard the whole city.

Pickpockets, terrorists...

car thefts...

squatters.

Come here.

Jesus.

Oh no.

No, No. Stop, stop, stop, stop.

Out.

- No no no.
- I'm going to get the car.

Come on, come on. It's okay, it's okay.

Hey baby.

We're going to take good care of you,
poopie, aren't we?

It's okay, it's okay.

- Mich, let's talk to that reporter.
- Ah, Mei... Meike, that...

Mich.

No.

Um...

We had to cut open her neck to
remove the skewers, but...

But it looks like she will survive.

- Can we...
- You can see her later.

Hey girl.

And yes, the only conclusion is...
Or the strong suspicion then arises...

He wanted the money for himself.

Press release OM.

- New DNA research.
- What now?

Y-chromosomal DNA research.

It's a new technique.

Performed on the nails of the widow.

Gerda.

It is a match with Louwes.

This technique does not produce
a unique profile.

3 to 4% of men have the profile
found on the nails.

But Louwes has it.

Wow.

- There go Knoops' fingernails.
- Yes, plus Louwes' motive.

- And he lied about drawing blood.
- It looks like it.

Check that nail news,
also from an expert.

If it's right, than it's going
to be broadcast.

And now they come with nails.

They were also investigated in 2004
and then there was nothing on it.

But Maurice, there is now a
technique that can now find something...

Yes, but that's the
misunderstanding.

And that is also neat
PR trick from the OM...

I thought of something last night.
Those nails.

What if the handyman has the same
profile as those 3 to 4% of men?

If not, then the broadcast
becomes difficult.

Everyone will start speculating.

That man never does.

Even if he didn't,
there may be a match.

But if there is no match,
he is 100% innocent.

Yes.

Just make sure you get to talk
to that handyman at all.

Hey.

That's mommy.

Hey.

Eggs. Aaah.

How was your day?

Yes, fantastic.

What?

That he wants to help me get rid of you.
They're ready for me.

What bullshit.

So now they know where we live.

There's no stamp on it,
someone just delivers this.

I can't do this anymore.

I can't do this anymore.

I can't take this anymore.

I can't.

You destroy everything.
You destroy everything. Goddamnit.

Hey.

Hey, hey, hey.

I'm going to talk to that journalist.
I'm going to talk to him.

Yes?

Yes?

Mr. Vlug?

Yes>

No, of course.

Tuesday is fine.

Yes.

Yes!

Yes!

Mr Haan.

Meet Michael and Meike.

Bas.

Hallo.

Let's sit down.

Go ahead, Mr Haan.

My clients are ready.

First of all thank you very much
for being willing to meet me.

I understand...

I understand that you would
rather not be here.

But if you don't respond
to what Maurice writes...

then I fear that in the
eyes of the general public...

the handyman is the killer.

I'd like to check some things from
Maurice's website one by one.

- Is that okay?
- Yes.

Have you ever been a patient
of Dr. Wittenberg?

No.

No, I knew the doctor from the
antique store where I worked.

Mrs Wittenberg too.

But I had nothing to do
with the doctor's profession.

I am not a psychiatric patient.

Not from him
and not from anyone else.

You would have hit rock bottom...

and lack of money because
you didn't have a job.

Michaël worked from 1993 to 2002
through and for a job placement company.

As a supervisor, manager, quality
controller and security officer...

for about 36 hours a week. Here.

'Michaël de Jong

is a very reliable,
extremely knowledgeable employee.'

And here:

'Welcome to provide
references about Mr. MC de Jong.'

The murder was in 1999...

so Michael was working at that company
from long before until long after.

So no unemployment and no decline.

And I'm not a handyman at all. I did
odd jobs at her house sometimes, but...

nothing more.

The bookkeeper
is not a bookkeeper.

and the handyman
is not a handyman.

And drugs?

Yes, that's quite a nice one.
I can't even do drugs.

I have an allergy, uh...

- Quincke's edema.
- Doctor's statement.

I can drop dead if I do drugs.

Luckily I don't have an alcohol
allergy. I can drink beer in peace.

And I've been drunk sometimes.

I've never ran somebody over as well.

- Well... No, sorry.
- Do not.

No, sorry, sorry.

What about that alibi?

It doesn't matter what we
say about it, right?

Yes, we said different things.
You can't change that

When we say we are mistaken,
De Hond calls us pathological liars.

Then everyone runs after it. But if
Louwes and his wife are mistaken...

That's true.

Louwes and his wife also contradicted
each other on this same point.

I know.

...Louwes and mister De Hond. But when
we say something, we are the liars

But then there is the point of
knowing the perpetrator.

Yes but...

I don't want to say anything about that.

At that time the police
questioned Michael about it

and decided not to prosecute him.

It doesn't make my story
any more credible, but...

But a DNA test will.

I presume you know
about the nail dirt?

Mr. Haan, my
client is not crazy.

I understand the risk,
but it could end all discussion.

Oh, just when I was beginning to believe
that your opportunism had limits.

It's definitely not that, but...

Look, if you do it
and you don't like the results

you can keep
sweep it under the rug.

Says the journalist.

You don't have to tell me anything.

Such a test can probably
be done anonymously.

Independently
and with a notary...

No, we'll do it.

- Michael.
- No, and I want Mr. Haan to film that.

So everyone can see,
huh, that there's...

- that it is clear.
- Michael.

One in 25 men has that profile.

And then I got it, so what?

Then everyone will think I did it.
What's the difference with now?

We're already dead anyway.

Don't make it too late...

The final report of Brouwer's
exploratory investigation

has been leaked.

Of course.

And? Any news?

No.

Then the motive and knowledge
of the perpetrator remain.

What did Michael himself say about it?

He doesn't want to
say anything about that.

I didn't ask about the motive.

- That wouldn't prove anything.
- What was it again?

Mrs Wittenberg would have
cut his bequest in half...

and he allegedly killed her
in a drunken brawl.

Well, that remains a point
for Maurice then.

If we assume that.

If Maurice and the judiciary have
determined that halving of the bequest..

then you have to explain me how.

This is the old one.

'To Mr. MC de Jong, free of duties
and costs...

an amount in cash of 25,000 guilders.'

This is the new one.

'To Mr. MC de Jong,
free of duties and costs...

an amount in cash
of 25,000 guilders.'

- No.
- Yes.

- And no one has ever checked this?
- No one. Yes, me now.

One more to go.

Yes.

But he doesn't want
to say anything about that. Anyway.

If the DNA test shows it isn't him,
then it isn't him.

Maybe he doesn't dare.

It's kind of like Russian roulette,
right?

Do you already have that one?

- With the door?
- Yes.

No, that's not going to work.
It's too dark.

Shit.

Sorry, we weren't ready yet.
Would you like to step out again?

- How is it going?
- Yes...

What are you doing, man?

Yeah, uh, I had to report myself.

For what?

Mr De Jong, come on in.

Hello.

Michael de Jong.

- Frans.
- Hi.

Several people stated that you had said
at Mrs Wittenberg's funeral...

that her body was found in the living
room and the time of the finding.

That's right?

Yes, everyone had questions.

And you had answers?

So unreal.
Last Wednesday I was still with her.

That's bizarre.

No one says or knows anything.

But how? That information was only
known to the police.

Oh that uh...

I did not know that.

Do you know what that means?

This means that you have
perpetrator knowledge.

Do you understand what I just said?

Yes, but it sounds so absurd.
Perpetrator knowledge.

How did you know she was laying there?

- I had heard that.
- From whom?

From someone.

Someone?

Come on, it's coming out anyway.

It must have been
a real massacre.

I overheard a
detective talking about it.

Five stabs to her chest.

So you protect the perpetrator?

I don't want
to get anyone in trouble.

If you continue like this,
you will be in trouble.

She didn't show up for a
hairdressing appointment on Saturday.

Her regular hairdresser
called the police.

The card said Thursday.

Then she was murdered.
They didn't find her until Saturday.

In the living room.

Well, hey.

Sst. Yes.

Well, has it been recorded?

Otherwise we'll do it again.

Then we are just as happy.

It's golden, Bas.
How many minutes do you need?

The exclusion of Michael on the
basis of the DNA test...

the new DNA evidence against Louwes,
his possible motive...

the interview with Professor Van Mourik
about this, the De Hond method...

The whole broadcast.

Well, you're in luck.

Rein needs more time for that
special on campaign finance,

so Wednesday.

- In two days?
- Yes.

I can't make it. There are
hours of material.

No, I understand.

Let's see. Well, then... yes, then
Tuesday. Next week. Can you manage that?

Yes.

It is absolutely
impossible that the...

handyman left the
DNA on the nails.

Eh, title of Eikelenboom. Then I would
do the microscope shot now.

Oh no, wait. uh...

Just put the quote from Vlug here,
that's better.

This is rock solid technical proof...

that Michael de Jong cannot be linked to
the murder in any way.

Yes.

Mireille, do you have those recordings
of Van Koppen?

- What is this?
- Maurice's weblog.

"Murder weapon in Deventer murder case
may be under the widow's tombstone."

"A metal object has been found that
strongly resembles a knife."

"I call on the judiciary to
open the grave."

- How does he get this?
- From the manager of the cemetery.

And he comes with this after
seven years?

He says the police didn't write
everything down at the time.

Bas, it's Vlug.

- Hello?
- Have you seen Maurice's website yet?

- Yes, I just saw it.
- When do you think you can broadcast?

- Next Tuesday.
- Only then?

Yes.

Then De Hond
can shoot for a week.

Yes.

This evening, Plasman is sitting
at 'Pauw & Witteman'.

How do I explain this
to Michael and Meike?

Yes, I know, but
it can't be sooner.

Why didn't the cemetery manager
raise alarm sooner?

Eh, he did, he says. He was then
questioned by the police at the time.

Eh, there is also a mutation to
be found in the journal of the research.

Only he says: What I said then does not
correspond to what it says now.

He had given very
specific information.

What then?

That he spoke to the widow
on the morning of the murder.

And that she said, I'm going
to tell the handyman today...

that he is going out of my will.

She couldn't do that at all, asshole.

Maurice de Hond has put
together a German team.

They specialize in detecting
metal objects underground.

With Bas.

Yes.

Yes I know.

I've seen it.

I'm going as fast as I can.

If everyone didn't disturb me all day...
Yes.

Okay. Yes.

I cannot tell you what kind of
metal, but there is something.

What now?

Oh sorry, it's you.

- The broadcast is moved to Monday.
- What?

A week later. Yes, sorry,
extra party leader debate...

and Wilders will also come.

Damn it Gerda,
you can't do that.

Do you know
how many times Vlug called?

Then you say that if we
don't broadcast that debate, RTL will.

At the same time. And then no one
will watch your report.

Sorry, Bas.

I thought you could use a shot.

Thank you.

Is the grave now guarded?

- Of course.
- By who?

- By people.
- Yes, but is that police?

So not police,
it could be police now.

Where does he pay it all from?

What do you mean?

How much do you think
such a Plasman costs?

- He's just there for the publicity.
- Even still.

Private detectives, a team of German
tomb investigators, 24/7 surveillance..

- I don't think that Gerda...
- Ah, Gerda. Just a few phone calls.

- Follow the money.
- Yes, indeed.

It's 10 past 1. Good afternoon
and welcome to Stand.nl.

Our position: Maurice de Hond must
stop insinuating. Call 0800-1101.

- Good afternoon, this is Truus.
- Hello, Truus.

- I absolutely disagree. That
gentleman is absolutely innocent.

As he reacted on
TV to the statement...

Well, go on. Maurice de Hond, go on.

Thank you. Good afternoon.

Michael de J., that handyman,
is obviously not right in his head.

And the Deventer police force is
blackmailable as I'm concerned.

That handyman is completely stuck.
What do you think of that?

Let's stay away
from that lawsuit.

He's accusing an unconvicted.

Lady Justice has long since lost her
blindfold a long time ago.

He knows what he is doing.

6 a clock. The NOS Radio 1 Journal with
Karin van den Boogaert.

Because of growing social unrest,
the judge has decided...

to open the grave of the
widow Wittenberg.

Unbelievable, what a circus!

At 3:00 PM the grave has been lifted.

The stone is from the tomb and
is being examined for traces.

And much more importantly:
the knife can finally be searched for.

Each layer of sand is sieved.
Not an inch is looked over.

You always leave behind DNA...

It was just announced that no knife
was found in the grave.

The grave was opened
after Maurice de Hond...

suggested the murder
weapon might lay in the grave.

I'm so glad we're airing on Monday.

- I made some more phone calls.
- What?

Don't you remember:
who pays for all this?

Holy fuck.

- Who is De Lange?
- What is De Lange is a better question.

OK, what?

He's rich. It's an entrepreneur
with parking garages, call centers...

And what does he have
to do with Maurice De Hond?

It's in this contract.

'...that the collaboration aside
from the Deventer murder case...

will consist of the establishment of a
socio-political organization...

with the provisional name Wij 21.'

So Deventer as the starting shot
of a political movement?

It says 'Maurice de Hond will take on
the role of eye-catcher.'

Handy, then he can poll himself.

This is really sick.

And then point three:
De Lange also wants his money back.

Maurice must then conduct a damage
procedure against the OM or the state.

In other words: Maurice has to litigate
all the way. No choice.

This should be on the air.

Do we have this exclusive?

Joep Dohmen beat me.
It is in the NRC this afternoon.

- Will you manage before tonight?
- No, impossible.

Okay, then Thursday.

That broadcast is almost done.

Then I'll ask Ellen to start
and we turn it around

No, sorry, no more delay.
I can't do that, not again.

Yes that's OK. Yes.

Get out, Haan.

- Good luck, huh.
- Come on, let's start.

Live in five, four, three...

Exculpatory DNA evidence in the
Deventer murder case. This is Network.

Oh, Meike, it's starting.

Hello, ladies and gentlemen.
Good evening.

New facts in the controversial
Deventer murder case.

A case that has grown into a battle
with supporters and opponents.

One is convinced that Ernest Louwes
has been rightly convicted.

The other thinks the murdered widow's
handyman must have done it.

What is the truth in this murder case?

Reporter Bas Haan investigated the case
and uncovered new facts...

about exculpatory DNA evidence
and a possible motive.

Seven years ago, the widow was murdered.

The Deventer murder case is now one
of the most sensational...

criminal cases, thanks to the
actions of Maurice de Hond.

Last week the widow's grave
was opened...

in search of the handyman's
murder weapon.

In vain. The handyman's lawyer is now
demanding a gag order against De Hond.

Just try defend yourself against
De Hond and such press offensive.

That's almost impossible.

I've done everything...

to update the Dutch
people via my website.

De Hond is convinced that the
DNA evidence is worthless.

But this story is not about
conspiracy theories, but about facts.

The DNA in this case is crucial.
And now comes another revelation.

Additional DNA testing
relieves the handyman.

It is absolutely impossible that the
handyman left the DNA on the nails.

This is rock solid technical proof...

that Michael de Jong cannot be
linked to the murder in any way.

Well.

Yes.

Basje.

Gerda.

- Well done.
- Thank you.

- Hey, hoppakee.
- Nice man.

- Top.
- Thanks to you, huh.

- Let's go have a drink somewhere.
- Good plan.

Well done.

Come on.

Good? -Ja.

All right.

Sorry, are you perhaps Bas Haan?

Certainly.

Do you have
Richard Eikelenboom's number?

What do you need that for?

'Reporter' is going to make an hour and
a half special about the Deventer case.

Is there any news then?

An American DNA expert declares that
the evidence against Louwes is nothing.

So what does the expert say
about the combination...

of saliva, touch marks,
blood and nail dirt?

Which nail dirt?

Have you seen my report?

Or are you going to
say: Which report?

Do you still have
that number for me?

What do you think?

Better look at my report first, fool!

Thank God it's Friday.

Tonight, Yolanthe Cabau van Kasbergen..

Arthur Japin, Javier Guzman...

Bastiaan Geleijnse,
Don Diego Powder...

Pieter Jan Hagens,
Maurice de Hond...

and Claudia de Breij.

They didn't take anything away
from my broadcast.

They didn't even see it.

Like it never fucking aired.

- Here is Maurice the Hond.
- What the fuck.

Maurice, yesterday sentenced to
two months conditional

Does his mean you can never say
again: the handyman did it?

If I don't comply with the ruling,
I will be jailed for two months.

Are you never going to say again:
Michael de Jong did it?

I am prepared to do a lot for
this program...

but not prison for two months.

No, but I was
wondering because you...

I admire your fanaticism in this case.
And your sense of justice.

If you can't say it, can you sing it?

- I think only Jan Smit.
- Only Jan Smit.

Because I was thinking about…

about...

thinking about 'the Deventer
murder case: the musical'.

Fucking circus.

If more than 200,000 people have
watched that crap, I'll write a book.

- A book?
- A book.

No broadcast schedule, budget,
so few minutes to cram it all into.

Just a book. With all the facts about
the case. All the facts.

Do you think people
are waiting for that?

Yes, people want to know
what's really going on.

I firmly believe that.

But it is made them incredibly difficult
by people who throw sand in their eyes.

I want to be able to say: Do you want
the facts? There they are, in that book.

Researched, checked and checked again.
And if you want to ignore them...

they are still there.
Those facts exist...

are real, and are not going away.

What?

Do you know how many books are
published per year?

I'll make sure people know it's there.

If necessary, I will
enter the circus myself.

The circus?

January 2009

It is one of the most talked
about lawsuits of all time.

Who killed the wealthy widow
Wittenberg in 1999?

Ernest Louwes was convicted, acquitted
and then through DNA testing...

sentenced to 12 years.
29 judges were involved in the case.

But in the press, a campaign
led by Maurice de Hond

questioned
the course of justice.

The grave has even been opened.

Journalist Bas Haan wrote 'De Deventer
murder case: the conspiracy unraveled'

Welcome

You have been on this case
for a long time.

Tonight I will ask you the question you
surely get asked all the time:

Who did it?
The handyman, or Ernest Louwes?

Maurice de Hond
was sentenced for libel,

and ordered to pay
35.000 Euro in compensation

to Michael de Jong
and his girlfriend Meike.

A, for Dutch standards,
exceptionally high figure.

He never retracted any of
his accusations against Michael de Jong.

Michael de Jong could
never find a job again.

Michael has an autoimmune disease.

Medical research has shown that
the chance of getting this disease

is greatly increased
by chronical stress.

The financial compensation of 35.000
Euro was entirely spend on legal costs.

Ernest Louwes served his sentence and
is currently an employed citizen again.

He still fights for his acquittal
through his lawyer Knoops.

In 2014 the Supreme court started researching
a possible re-opening of the case.

In consultation with Knoops,

an English DNA expert
has been appointed for a third opinion".

In 2019, the expert also confirmed

the most important conclusions
of the NFI about the DNA evidence,

the basis for
the conviction of Louwes.

Bas Haan is currently
a research journalist for Nieuwsuur.

His reporting
has received numerous awards

Among them "De Tegel" three times, the
most important Dutch journalistic prize.

In 2015 he was chosen
as journalist of the year.

Nothing has been heard anymore
from the political movement "Wij 21",

which was founded by
de Hond en de Lange.