Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,390 --> 00:00:01,920
Welcome to exercise number two.
2
00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:10,200
So this person is 24, but they carry a lot of debt, and so naturally their application should be rejected,
3
00:00:10,210 --> 00:00:15,890
but our conditionals are not working as they should, and for some reason their application gets processed.
4
00:00:16,620 --> 00:00:19,200
So let's add some break points and figure out what's going on.
5
00:00:28,390 --> 00:00:34,270
OK, now we're going to launch the debugger for the conditionals class and let's step through each line
6
00:00:34,270 --> 00:00:37,150
and hopefully we can find some mistakes, OK?
7
00:00:37,180 --> 00:00:38,220
There's the first mistake.
8
00:00:38,230 --> 00:00:42,850
So apparently their credit score here is good, but we know it shouldn't be because they're adept as
9
00:00:42,850 --> 00:00:44,260
four thousand dollars.
10
00:00:45,190 --> 00:00:48,340
So we can stop right here and investigate.
11
00:00:49,250 --> 00:00:54,560
So if this condition is true, if debt is bigger than zero, then return good, otherwise bad.
12
00:00:55,460 --> 00:00:56,510
It should be the opposite.
13
00:00:56,880 --> 00:01:00,860
If their debt is higher than zero, then it should return bad, otherwise good.
14
00:01:06,030 --> 00:01:07,500
By the way, this.
15
00:01:09,780 --> 00:01:16,380
Is the same thing is writing this, but the conditional assignment syntax is a lot cleaner, but honestly,
16
00:01:16,380 --> 00:01:17,560
you don't have to use it.
17
00:01:17,580 --> 00:01:23,130
It's totally up to you if you want to use a standard NFLs to assign a value between a binary number
18
00:01:23,130 --> 00:01:23,910
of choices.
19
00:01:23,910 --> 00:01:27,660
Power to you if you want to use conditional assignment syntax.
20
00:01:27,660 --> 00:01:32,760
The ternary operators, which can be thought of as a simplified version of the default statement, then
21
00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:34,320
by all means you can do that as well.
22
00:01:34,530 --> 00:01:39,210
I personally prefer using the ternary operator is when it's appropriate because it's a lot cleaner and
23
00:01:39,210 --> 00:01:39,990
it's less code.
24
00:01:40,650 --> 00:01:43,230
In any case, you can find the syntax in your cheat sheet.
25
00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:45,300
All right, let's run the code.
26
00:01:55,630 --> 00:01:58,720
All right, so relaunched the debugger, maybe there's something we missed.
27
00:02:07,580 --> 00:02:08,900
Oh, this is false.
28
00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:13,790
It seems like we mixed up our condition because clearly a 24 year old should be old enough.
29
00:02:14,540 --> 00:02:17,150
And now do you see how useful the debugging tool is?
30
00:02:17,420 --> 00:02:21,560
Because from first glance, you're not going to notice the wrongful comparison operator.
31
00:02:21,770 --> 00:02:26,630
But when you can see that the output is clearly wrong, then it's going to prompt you to investigate
32
00:02:26,630 --> 00:02:27,140
the matter.
33
00:02:27,380 --> 00:02:29,720
And in this case, we fixed the comparison.
34
00:02:31,600 --> 00:02:33,280
Hopefully now everything should be good.
35
00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:49,160
So apparently this works, but to run some test cases to make sure let's do an age of 16 with adeptness
36
00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:49,940
4000.
37
00:02:52,880 --> 00:02:54,620
Definitely shouldn't get processed.
38
00:02:59,920 --> 00:03:00,490
OK, good.
39
00:03:01,080 --> 00:03:03,670
Let's do 24 years old with a zero adepts.
40
00:03:06,920 --> 00:03:08,990
So this application should get processed.
41
00:03:12,260 --> 00:03:17,930
But it doesn't there's something wrong with our code, and I hope you can see how important it is to
42
00:03:17,930 --> 00:03:23,210
run test cases, test cases are the ultimate way to really battle test your application to make sure
43
00:03:23,210 --> 00:03:25,010
that everything works the way that it should.
44
00:03:25,730 --> 00:03:26,200
All right.
45
00:03:26,210 --> 00:03:29,090
In any case, let's launch the debugger and see what's wrong.
46
00:03:36,020 --> 00:03:40,790
At this line of code can apply is true and credit score is good, but check it out.
47
00:03:41,030 --> 00:03:47,120
The if statement was programmed to process applications if they're not eligible, which doesn't make
48
00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:51,530
any sense, we should only process applications where the person is eligible.
49
00:03:53,460 --> 00:03:55,650
And if they have a good credit.
50
00:03:56,970 --> 00:04:01,230
And I think now we're ready to run the code because we've effectively debug the application.
51
00:04:13,650 --> 00:04:14,750
Let's run it one more time.
52
00:04:21,589 --> 00:04:24,470
Credit score equals good because debt is no higher than zero.
53
00:04:26,640 --> 00:04:29,040
The person is over 18 so they can apply.
54
00:04:31,460 --> 00:04:35,810
The statement should run because the person is over 18 and has good credit score.
55
00:04:37,110 --> 00:04:39,030
And so we know this line is going to run.
56
00:04:39,780 --> 00:04:45,450
It's pretty amazing that we can actually visualize how the code runs and how the state of our application
57
00:04:45,450 --> 00:04:46,860
changes line by line.
58
00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:53,010
And so for the sake of practice, let's not forget to try the other test cases.
59
00:05:08,450 --> 00:05:11,330
Credit score equals bad because that is higher than zero.
60
00:05:12,710 --> 00:05:18,170
The person is under 18, so they cannot apply, the statement should run if the person is over 18 and
61
00:05:18,170 --> 00:05:20,300
has good credit score, but that is not the case.
62
00:05:24,460 --> 00:05:25,990
So the statement runs.
63
00:05:30,710 --> 00:05:32,360
All right, last test case.
64
00:05:39,190 --> 00:05:44,620
This time, the credit score is good because that isn't bigger than zero, the person is under 18,
65
00:05:44,620 --> 00:05:50,470
however, so they cannot apply the system and should run if the person is over 18 and they have a good
66
00:05:50,470 --> 00:05:51,090
credit score.
67
00:05:51,220 --> 00:05:53,830
But that is not the case, as you can clearly see.
68
00:05:54,070 --> 00:05:56,170
So we know the statement runs.
69
00:05:59,780 --> 00:06:00,750
OK, there you go.
70
00:06:00,770 --> 00:06:02,630
I hope you enjoy this exercise.
6697
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.
Afrikaans
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Bulgarian
Catalan
Cebuano
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Finnish
French
Frisian
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hawaiian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Kazakh
Khmer
Korean
Kurdish (Kurmanji)
Kyrgyz
Lao
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Maltese
Maori
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Nepali
Norwegian
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Serbian
Sesotho
Shona
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
