Original subtitles

This programme contains scenes which some viewers may find upsetting.

My name is Alishan Jafri.

I am a journalist reporting on hate crimes

and the rise of extreme politics.

India is a state where calls for genocide against Muslims

are on the rise.

There is a very direct call to violence

to make India a Hindu nation.

The Prime Minister of this country should have spoken against it.

But he does not speak up.

CROWD CHANTS: Modi! Modi! Modi!

REPORTER: The man of the moment.

Prime Minister of India.

He is the leader of the world's biggest democracy.

Narendra Damodardas Modi.

He came to power promising a new age of prosperity.

CHEERING

But his rule has been marred by religious turmoil.

REPORTER: There have been violent protests

in opposition to a new citizenship law,

which many see as discriminating

against the nation's Muslim minority.

REPORTER: Many in India see this law as anti-Muslim.

REPORTER: Massive pelting.

Massive pelting as of now is going on.

This series tells the story of Narendra Modi's

troubled relationship with India's Muslims.

As a young child, Mr Modi joined an organisation which believes

that this is a country of the Hindus.

Could he have done more to prevent violence

that killed hundreds of Muslims?

We were hearing that those orders to let all this happen

were coming from the top.

It is obviously a stain on his reputation.

There's no way out of that.

I'm not agree with your analysis.

I'm not agree with your information.

From where you have picked up this type of garbage, I do not know.

He was cleared of criminal conspiracy,

a finding upheld by India's highest court.

Agenda was to destroy Narendra Modi politically.

The agenda was explicitly political.

But concerns will not go away.

Questions remained over Mr Modi's head for a long time,

and they remain over him now.

Narendra Modi has promised to build a new India.

But what does that mean for the millions of people who belong

to its largest minority?

This regime wants to disenfranchise the Muslims

and make India a Hindu nation.

HORNS HONK, THEY SHOUT

Mariam's husband, Alimuddin, was a Muslim.

His attackers were Hindu.

Prior to Modi coming to power,

there is intercommunal violence in India.

Sometimes this involves lynchings of Muslims, of Hindus, of Sikhs.

But definitely we can say

that after 2014 there are increased

numbers of lynchings towards the Muslim population.

Alimuddin's attackers accused him of trading beef,

something that had been becoming increasingly controversial

under Narendra Modi's rule.

Hindus consider cows to be sacred.

REPORTER: Two Muslim women were beaten, allegedly by the members

of a Hindu radical group.

REPORTER: Now, this happened when the police

received a tip-off that two women

on a local train were bringing beef to sell...

A large mob dragged 50-year-old Mohammad Akhlaq Saifi

out of his home,

killing him in front of his family with the equipment he uses for...

And it began with a speech that the Prime Minister made.

Mr Modi said that India was participating in what he called

the Pink Revolution.

The Pink Revolution refers to the export of beef

and the sort of bloody images of meat.

In response to that, the BJP states criminalised the possession of beef.

After that, the violence began.

Over three and a half years,

vigilantes would kill 44 people and injure around 280

in cow-related violence.

Most victims were Muslim.

Few of the attackers were brought to justice.

There were calls for Mr Modi to condemn the violence,

but he was largely silent.

His silence is heard by the people as appreciation.

It is a clear signal that - go ahead,

nothing will be done against you.

Amid mounting criticism,

on the day of Alimuddin's murder, Mr Modi spoke out.

Then there was a surprising development.

REPORTER: Three days after Alimuddin Ansari was killed by cow vigilantes,

the first political arrest in the case, Nityanand Mahato,

the BJP's district spokesman.

Police say a video of the incident shows Mahato dragged Ansari

out of the van.

BJP spokesman Nityanand Mahato was found guilty of Alimuddin's murder

and sentenced to life in prison.

But one of Mr Modi's government ministers helped him

and the other convicted men with their legal fees.

And when they were bailed,

he welcomed them with garlands of flowers.

REPORTER: Jayant Sinha remains brazen,

despite outrage over his move

to welcome and garland the eight convicts of the 2017 lynching.

So is there tacit support by the state for actions like these?

Mr Sinha said he assisted the men because they were poor.

He criticised the way photos of him with them had been misused,

but said he would not do it again.

Over four years later, the men are still free.

The clear message is that this is a Hindu majoritarian country

and anybody who does anything or takes any action

which is against the sentiment of the Hindus of India

are going to be targeted.

If there is evidence that certain people

have been guilty of things like lynching,

it is not the business of a political party

to condone them or felicitate them.

At the same time, to generalise from this incident

to mean that this is the standard practice in India,

this is the character of the BJP, is, to my mind,

an unwarranted assumption.

If you look back at it now,

the lynchings are the beginnings

of things that became bigger and bigger.

They are so disturbing and horrifying.

They were the early warning system of what was coming.

CROWD CHANTS: Modi! Modi! Modi!

When Mr Modi ran for a second term as Prime Minister,

his brand of Hindu nationalism

was backed by a record number of Indian voters.

His party won the largest majority it had ever seen.

India's Prime Minister, Narendra Modi,

has secured a second five-year term

in the country's historic general election.

For the first time, the BJP won in areas which they had NEVER won in.

You got stupendous victories.

Modi had really, truly become a pan-India figure.

A victory for Mr Modi was interpreted

as a mandate for the muscular nationalism

that Mr Modi and his government had been projecting.

CROWD CHANTS: Modi! Modi! Modi!

REPORTER: The man of the moment

who will take oath of secrecy and office

for the second time as Prime Minister of India.

He was now one of the most powerful politicians

the country had ever seen.

They realise that they can quickly instigate their agenda.

The fundamental aim is to Hinduise the way that India functions

and irrevocably change the political, social

and cultural nature of India.

Essentially, the gloves are off.

Mr Modi is definitely trying to make India a majoritarian country,

you know, where Hindu primacy is established.

I don't think that there's any doubt about that.

This regime wants to accommodate the Hindus

and basically disenfranchise the Muslims.

The idea is to make India a Hindu nation.

There is a Hindu population in India.

It's more than... Around 80%.

Major support for BJP comes from those people,

those who consider themselves as Hindu.

That doesn't mean anti-Muslim party or anti-Sikh

or anti-Christian party.

It is the most centralised government that has ever

been run in India.

There's almost no pushback to any kind of order

that comes from Narendra Modi.

All decision-making is directly controlled.

Mr Modi would quickly turn his attention to the only part

of India with a Muslim majority.

I'm Habeel Iqbal.

I'm a lawyer and I work in Kashmir.

Many rumours were going on that the government are going to change

Jammu and Kashmir.

What the politicians were saying made it clear that something

sinister is in the offing.

Kashmir is one of India's most sensitive areas...

..marred by years of terrorism

and part of a bitter conflict with neighbouring Pakistan.

For some 70 years,

special rules had allowed Kashmiris to run their own affairs.

But this was unacceptable to the party in power.

The BJP's manifestos, right from the '90s or even earlier,

had certain particular demands which were there.

One was the rescinding of Article 370,

which gives special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

We regard the whole of Kashmir as a part of India.

So we said, "Why should we have

"this Article 370 to keep Kashmir differently?"

Nine weeks after Mr Modi's swearing in,

troops were sent into Kashmir.

REPORTER: The government approves sending in 10,000

additional paramilitary troops to Jammu and Kashmir.

REPORTER: The centre is now rushing about 25,000 more

paramilitary personnel to the valley.

Now, this is all for a massive security drive to counter terrorism

and bolster the security preparedness.

REPORTER: Major politicians in the region

were placed under house arrest.

Internet and phone services are completely cut off.

Strict curfew was put throughout Kashmir.

There was a complete communication blackout.

Completely, we were cut off from the outside world.

The fear and anxiety was creeping up.

On the 5th of August, Mr Modi's government scrapped the arrangement

that gave Kashmir autonomy and took direct control.

REPORTER: India's government has made a significant move

to take direct control of the state of Kashmir.

Opposition parties have called this one of the darkest days

for Indian democracy.

Now you can say that Jammu and Kashmir is ruled from New Delhi.

And a new policy of "Indianisation" is taking place.

Three days later, Mr Modi addressed the nation.

It was a hugely popular decision within the country.

It may have been contested and there might have been other

issues which, vis-a-vis relations with Pakistan,

but within the country it was hugely popular.

But in Kashmir, the reaction was stark.

EXPLOSION, PEOPLE SHOUT

REPORTER: In spite of a curfew,

hundreds of protesters clashed with police after Friday prayers.

The government knew that there would be huge protests.

But the response of the state has been the same

whenever any protest takes place

to suppress and to silence the protesters.

People were arbitrarily detained.

They were arresting people left, right and centre.

It was like a horror show.

Nearly 4,000 people were detained in the first month alone.

Habeel says he began to hear claims of beatings and torture

at the hands of the authorities.

People had been taken in the dead of the night

and they were subjected to extreme physical torture.

One guy I met,

torture was being done on him

and at the same time,

a public address system was kept near him

so that the entire village could hear him cry.

It was the tactic to intimidate the entire population.

They don't want the world to see what is happening in Kashmir.

The Indian army has vigorously denied claims of torture.

But the UN's most senior human rights expert spoke out.

I am deeply concerned about the impact of recent actions

by the government of India on the human rights of Kashmiris,

including restrictions on internet communication and peaceful assembly

and the detention of local political leaders and activists.

Kashmir is very important for Mr Modi

to harness the Hindu vote in other parts of the country.

Showing that the Kashmiri Muslim citizens are being controlled,

are being checked, are being shown their place

is very important for Mr Modi's political sustenance.

After, you know, 70 years of this being in a limbo,

Jammu and Kashmir is back to where it should be.

It's a fully integrated part of the Indian Union.

NEWSREADER: There is a growing set of concerns

over a wave of killings targeting Hindus

in Indian-administered Kashmir.

In the years that followed,

there were incidents of anti-Hindu violence.

REPORTER: The Indian government denies

that there's an atmosphere of fear in Kashmir.

It says its policies are bringing peace and development.

During his election campaign, Mr Modi had promised to tackle

a major concern for Hindu nationalists -

illegal immigration.

He said he would introduce

a national register of Indian citizens.

CHEERING AND APPLAUSE

The NRC was already being tested in Assam, in a long-term trial

monitored by India's Supreme Court.

For decades, large numbers of Hindus and Muslims

had migrated here from neighbouring Bangladesh.

The Muslim migration into Assam has been for economic reasons.

The Hindu migration was basically because of religious persecution

and edging out of the minorities from Bangladesh.

If you want to create a modern state where citizens

should have all the rights, so at least you should define

who your citizens are.

In every other country, there is a national population register.

BJP wanted to do that and they should do that.

They have all the right.

Some feared what the NRC would mean for Assam's large Muslim population.

But Mr Modi said it would only target illegal immigrants.

What it said was, if you could show documentary evidence

of your ancestors being in the state of Assam before 1971,

you would be included in this National Register of Citizens.

If you could not do so, this would become a problem.

One of those who had to prove he was Indian

was Muslim rickshaw driver Nur Hussain.

The authorities said there was also a problem

with the papers for Nur's wife, Zahara.

So she was arrested, too.

Nur and Zahara took their children with them.

They would all spend the next 18 months in a detention centre.

This is not a country that is trying to manage a refugee problem.

This is a country that's manufacturing refugees

out of its own population, you know?

This is incredible.

Under the National Register of Citizens, 700,000 Muslims

were reportedly declared illegal immigrants,

but so were more than a million Hindus.

The government proposed a controversial amendment

to India's Citizenship Act that would help solve this problem.

The CAA says that those people who migrated to India

without documentation from Afghanistan, Bangladesh

or Pakistan, which are India's neighbours,

before December 31st, 2014, would be

given citizenship automatically,

unless they were Muslim.

It's meant, purely, in my opinion, to go after Muslims in this country.

It was not against any particular community or group.

It was in favour of persecuted minorities, which includes

Hindus, Sikh, Christians, Buddhists from Bangladesh,

Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Unfortunately, it was misinterpreted in some quarters as meaning

that it could lead to the citizenship of some people

being taken away.

The law never said that anything can be taken away.

The law spoke about giving citizenship to people.

Was Mr Modi right in getting this into parliament

and getting it enacted? Yes.

It is something that was welcomed all over India.

THEY CHANT

But protesters took to the streets to voice concern

about the future for Muslims in Narendra Modi's India.

REPORTER: Thousands gathered to protest against the bill

in several states in India,

describing it as a discriminatory legislation

intended to target Muslims.

TRANSLATION: This bill will not harm even a little bit any minority,

especially our Muslim brothers and sisters who live in this country,

because this bill only gives citizenship.

It doesn't take it away from anybody.

In this bill, they are targeting a community without naming it.

It violates the basic structure of the Constitution.

It is divisive and exclusive.

They are directly saying that all refugees are welcome

except Muslim refugees.

You're just putting a whole population into insecurity.

So that was the basis on which these huge protests rose up.

REPORTER: Many in India see this law as anti-Muslim and say it goes

against the fundamentals of India's constitution, which says everyone

is equal before the law.

The reaction in the country was massive.

The stake was very high.

It defined the identity of India.

The very identity, the very nature

of the Indian state was at stake.

In Delhi, students at a prestigious university

gathered for a protest march on India's parliament.

All we wanted was one march to the parliament

to register our protest against the CAA and the NRC.

I strongly believe that the CAA can make a lot of Muslims stateless.

That is why, you know, we've been very vocal.

The police barricaded the road and, you know, stopped the students

from marching forward.

That is when some students tried to cross the barricade.

Tear-gas shell is fired,

and it just falls right in front of me.

I just couldn't breathe.

One of my friends, he was completely drenched in blood.

We did not expect that a students' protest would be met out

with such brutality by the police.

It was an unbelievable situation to be in,

in Delhi, in the heart of capital.

It suddenly seemed like a war zone now.

The violence prompted more student protests.

The demonstrations spread.

Then, at the university,

the police decided to move in.

THUDDING, SCREAMING

Suddenly, the police burst inside...

..beating people like anything.

SHOUTING

Students were hiding under the tables and, you know,

they were shouting for help, for mercy,

but the police action continued indiscriminately.

GLASS SHATTERS

SHOUTING CONTINUES

REPORTER: Students try to hide from the police

and shield themselves from the tear gas in the air.

In the men's bathroom, an injured student,

and another one, who lay unconscious.

Dozens of them were taken to the local hospital.

Police came inside. They dragged us all...

They say they were beaten by the police for protesting

against India's new citizenship law.

They beat up the students.

They vandalised the university,

created an environment of fear and terror, to teach us a lesson,

to never protest again.

The police said they were trying to restore law and order.

Their actions led to even bigger protests.

REPORTER: Today, people marched...

..in Delhi...

..Mumbai...

..Kolkata, against what they see as a divisive law

that discriminates against Muslim migrants.

An unprecedented show of dissent

against the country's Hindu nationalist leadership.

REPORTER: Protests have now escalated

and it's across the country. It's now a pan-India agitation.

NEWSREADER: There have been violent protests in major cities

across India, mostly in opposition to a new citizenship law,

which many see as discriminating

against the nation's large Muslim minority.

In Delhi, protesters occupied parts of the city

and said they'd stay until the new law was repealed.

Safoora Zargar was among them.

I think more and more people become aware of the consequences

of the CAA and NRC,

you know, and that is why I feel that this protest became a movement.

I'm puzzled as to why there should have been

a significant Muslim protest in places like Delhi.

They were very much Muslims who'd been settled in Delhi

for a long, long time.

They were not threatened in any way.

And in my view, this was not a protest about citizenship.

This was a protest about Muslims feeling

that they had lost their foothold

in the political system over the past...

..seven, eight years.

Hardline Hindu clerics made threats against the Muslim protesters.

Supporters of Mr Modi held their own demonstrations.

You had senior BJP politicians appearing

and threatening the protesters.

As the protests entered their third month,

Narendra Modi's India had never seemed so divided.

But support for the embattled Prime Minister

came from an unexpected quarter.

CHEERING AND APPLAUSE

We now invite the dynamic,

dedicated and determined architect of New India,

Honourable Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

for his welcome remarks.

CHEERING

CHEERING

Friends,

I present to you, my friend...

..India's friend, the President of the United States of America,

Mr Donald Trump.

CHEERING AND APPLAUSE

Namaste, Trump!

Namaste, Trump!

Namaste, namaste.

CHEERING AND APPLAUSE

Let me begin by expressing my profound gratitude

to an exceptional leader,

a great champion of India,

a man who works night and day

for his country, and a man I am proud to call my true friend,

Prime Minister Modi.

CHEERING AND APPLAUSE

Your nation has always been admired around the Earth as the place

where millions upon millions of Hindus and Muslims

worship side by side in harmony.

Your unity is an inspiration to the world.

We love you. We love you, India, very much.

Thank you. Thank you.

CHEERING AND APPLAUSE

LOUD BANG

REPORTER: The situation is deteriorating as we speak.

Anti and pro-CAA protesters clashing.

Violence and vandalism continues.

REPORTER: This violence between anti and pro-CAA protesters

took a turn for the worse.

REPORTER: You can see the situation is very volatile.

Both the sides are clashing with each other.

You can see again, massive pelting.

Massive pelting as of now is going on.

REPORTER: The national capital, a battleground.

Violent clashes between Hindus and Muslims have rocked the city.

ANIMATED CONVERSATION

LOUD CRACK, HE CRIES OUT

HE SINGS QUIETLY

RAGGED SINGING

PROTESTER GROANS

POLICEMAN SHOUTS

The video of Faizan's beating went viral.

This Muslim man was beaten to death by the police.

Faizan was 23.

When I saw that video, I really thought,

what a disgusting society we are.

What a disgusting society we are.

EXPLOSION

The violence lasted for six days.

They are meant to protect all of India's people.

But here, the police are seen with Hindus throwing

stones towards Muslims.

Videos like these have been emerging since the violence last week.

500 people were injured during the riots.

53 were killed.

Two thirds of the dead were reportedly Muslim.

An investigation by Amnesty International concluded

that the police committed serious human rights violations, including

torture and ill treatment, excessive and arbitrary use of force

on protesters, and active participation in the violence.

The Amnesty report on the violence in Delhi showed that the police

did not act as it should have acted.

Where it did act, it often named the wrong people.

Often the victims were named as the perpetrators of the violence.

And we called for a proper investigation into these acts,

which hasn't happened so far.

Delhi police said the Amnesty report was lopsided,

biased against the police, and maliciously made a case

of human rights violations.

In the larger scheme of things,

the Delhi riots were not important, but they were important to the media

because it means less work and you can get good media footage

just at your doorstep.

No police officers have been charged over the beatings

of Asim and Faizan.

Delhi police say their investigation continues.

The police arrested more than 2,000 people over the violence,

both Hindus and Muslims.

And in the weeks that followed, they launched operations to arrest

those they considered ringleaders of the riots.

On 10th April, the doorbell rang.

My husband came and he just said,

"Some people have come to ask you questions."

A group of seven or eight policemen said, "Pack your bags."

I was not expecting my arrest.

They took me.

And the roads are completely empty and deserted.

I couldn't see anybody.

That was the scary part of it.

That feeling of being so alone.

There were charges against me, including hate speech, rioting,

criminal conspiracy,

murder.

Attempt to murder.

The maximum sentence would be lifetime imprisonment.

This is the Tihar Jail.

India's most-hardened criminals are kept here.

Muslim student Safoora was arrested and charged under a new legal

provision in an anti-terrorism law

called the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, or UAPA.

The first act of Mr Modi after becoming Prime Minister

in his second tenure was to make an amendment in the UAPA

which permitted the government to declare individual citizens

as terrorists, which was completely different from organisations

being declared as terrorist organisations.

Anybody could be declared a terrorist and be put behind bars

and would not be able to get bail for a long period of time.

First of all, I was put into complete isolation.

There's a cell, a very small cell.

I was pregnant and it was my first baby.

My biggest nightmare was giving birth in jail.

I couldn't imagine doing it all alone inside a prison.

Safoora spent 74 days in jail.

Safoora Zargar, the pregnant Jamia Millia Islamia student, was granted

bail today by the High Court after the police did not

oppose her bail on humanitarian grounds.

She is one of 16 Muslims accused of being key conspirators

in the Delhi riots, and charged under anti-terror laws.

TOY SQUEAKS

It started like a complete witch hunt of all those people who were

involved in the anti-CAA protests.

And, you know, to suppress dissent, to make an example out of us

and to put us behind bars.

I'm very confident that they will not be able to prove even

one charge against us.

There was CCTV footage,

there were messages, there were WhatsApp group chats.

On the basis of that, they got arrested.

And they were people from different communities,

not from a particular community.

The irony is that when...after the riots were over, the victims

became the guilty men and women,

and were accused of being responsible for the riots.

So, many were sent to jail, and they are still in jail.

By now, India was battling a new threat - coronavirus.

Strict lockdowns made further protest impossible.

But enmity between Hindus and Muslims remained.

I am a journalist reporting on hate crimes and the rise

of extreme politics.

Mostly my job is to go through videos of violence and hate speech.

India is a state where calls for genocide against Muslims

are on the rise.

A colleague was reporting from the Dharma Sansad,

that is basically Hindu religious parliament.

What they talked about was how Muslims should be eradicated

from the face of the earth.

Generally, we come across 10 to 12 videos per week.

Sometimes there are 10 to 12 videos per day.

These videos spread like wildfire.

They just go viral.

Muslims have got the message that they should not expect the state

to protect them.

We are talking to each other saying, "Do you think it will happen?

"Do you think it's really going to be like Rwanda?"

Why do I speak to you on this film?

Only so that there's a record somewhere that all of us

didn't agree with this, you know?

But it's not a call for help, because no help will come.

In June last year, a BJP spokeswoman made comments

about the Prophet Muhammad on TV that angered Muslims in India

and around the world.

Two Muslim men killed a Hindu who they said supported

the politician's comments.

The men were arrested after they posted a film of the killing

online and made threats against Mr Modi.

There are extremist groups from either side.

And because of the provocation of social media,

that has become a phenomena, you can say.

Even if there are calls from Hindu groups, then there

are Muslim groups also.

This is happening from both sides, and this should be stopped.

We should take action, whether it's said by Hindus,

whether it's said by Muslims, whether it's said by Sikhs,

or whoever, there are boundaries of free speech...

..in India.

And there should be.

I think the larger issue that we do not promote any form

of extremism has been said by Mr Modi many times.

The work that many of us do is very dangerous.

I have received death threats, but that does not deter me.

Reporting today has become more risky, more dangerous,

more difficult, and quite frankly,

based on where we are today,

the path looks even rockier.

Today in India, reporters face violence, intimidation and arrest

for doing their jobs.

Campaigners say press freedom has declined since Narendra Modi

came to power, and is now in crisis.

He views independent media as something that is going to do

damage to him and that is hostile to him.

I think he believes in the politics of full-spectrum dominance.

From his point of view, throttling the media, or exercising a high

degree of control over the media, is essential to his project.

Human rights campaigners say they are also under attack.

Amnesty in India says it was forced to suspend operations

by the government.

The government said the group had broken the law by circumventing

rules around foreign donations.

What he has done, in effect, is to be able

to shut down a very large part of civil society in this country.

Thousands of NGOs have shut after 2015, and it's quite dire.

I don't think that the NGO space, the civil society space,

has seen such a time ever in the history of independent India.

When Narendra Nodi came to power in 2014, India was considered

to be a free country by the US think-tank Freedom House.

Now it is only partly free.

Our democracy may not be perfect.

But it keeps on improving.

And I think there's enough elbow room for everybody to have opinions,

whether they are...rational or otherwise.

Safoora Zargar remains on bail.

They have dehumanised Muslims in the country.

It is being made very clear -

Muslims will have to live like second-class citizens.

Kismatun is still fighting to identify the police officers

who beat her son to death.

The men accused of attacking Alimuddin Ansari are

still out on bail.

Under Narendra Modi, India has been transformed.

He remains enormously popular

and hugely divisive.

What was politically incorrect has now become the consensus.

No longer does a Hindu think that it is wrong to demand special

rights for Hindus.

Mr Modi has been able to successfully give voice

to this sentiment.

Muslims in India are in a position that they've never been before,

and I don't know how it is that we'll be able to come out of it.

The perception that Mr Modi is anti-Muslim is widespread.

I don't deny that. It's there.

But I think what is important to realise is that - is there a single

institutional obstacle which debars Muslims or gives

Hindus exceptional privilege?

There isn't.

The West is looking at India as the best way

to balance China.

And that is the reason why they will not criticise, they will not condemn

most of the decisions which have been made.

Human rights are not very high on the list any more

because there is a bigger challenge.

It is important to the West not only economically but also politically.

Any big conversation in international affairs,

climate change, global finance, requires India to be in the room.

There can be no solution without India.

But it looks to be descending into some form of authoritarianism

where power is in the hands of one individual.

I think with a high degree of certainty, he'll win the next

election, maybe he'll win the election after that.

And that means for young people in India that that will be the only

India they know.