Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Let's estimate the losses of the occupiers ? Russian troop losses
are showing a steady increase with a strong pre-requisite for
a new record in February. In addition to the forecast, there is another point...
As the number of losses of the occupants increases, the number of destroyed armored
fighting vehicles continues to decrease. According to Foreign Policy at the moment the Russian side
has slightly more than 10 thousand armored vehicles left. Although it is not known how
many of them are actually combat-ready. Also Foreign Policy says that 3,950 vehicles are
ready. Mathematically this number of armored vehicles may be possible, but it is worth
paying attention to one nuance: for a long time now the occupiers have been trying to attack
without much armor support, which noticeably reduces their potential. If armored vehicles
were actually available in such quantity, they would not be gathering dust in the warehouses.
I have repeatedly drawn a parallel between the provision of medium and
light armor to units and offensive losses.
For example, if in March 2022 the enemy lost just over 3,900 men,
and almost 900 armored fighting vehicles, in January 2023 losses exceeded 2,700,
and the losses of the armored fighting vehicles were less than 300 units.
That is, the ratio of destroyed vehicles to losses of personnel has decreased by 16 times.
And this is not because the Russian troops have become better at fighting, if you think so.
Now we can observe not only an increase in losses among the occupying forces,
but also a decrease in losses of armored fighting vehicles,
the shortage of which remains an acute unsolvable problem for the Russian command.
Personnel losses are on the rise and Putin's generals are once again forced to change their
war tactics. The Russian General Staff's plan to replace heavy equipment with soldiers' carcasses
does not work. Tactics of the Second World War, which was used by the USSR,
is not designed for technological resistance of the modern army. Here you can see for yourself:
Occupant casualties rose in February, and at the current rate are expected to be 24,000-25,000.
If you count the wounded, you get 65,000 casualties in January and 75,000 in February.
If we consider that the Russian occupation group makes up 350,000 people, then only
in two months it will lose 190,000 soldiers through irrecoverable and sanitary losses.
Of course, some of the crippled will be replaced by the medically treated.
But most importantly, the Putin General Staff should understand that the non-recoverable losses
of the occupation troops are too great, so it is impossible to compensate for the lack of heavy
equipment by manpower in the future. Of course, we should not throw various Private military
companies and another wave of mobilization off the scales. But given the clumsiness of the
entire Russian military vertical, these efforts will not fundamentally affect the overall trend.
The only way out for the enemy is to seek another strategy. What are the options?
They will try to squeeze something out of the air by launching the rest of their rockets, S-300s,
drones, and even retrieving grandfather's balloons from the depots. As a matter of fact, this has
already been going on for the last 2-3 days. Nor should general mobilization be ruled out.
The Kremlin's obvious bet is on a kind of militaristic masochism: stalling for time,
expecting a successful counteroffensive by the AFU and the defeat of the Russian army.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.