All language subtitles for 13-02-2023ffdsgfhgf

Russian troops near Vuhledar were defeated and
moved about three kilometers away from the city.

The AFU are in the city, and the approaches
to Vuhledar are strewn with the bodies

of Russian soldiers. No one is picking
them up or even asking to pick them up!

This is a horrifying debacle. The Ukrainians let
the Russian columns pull into the roads (and there

were mines all around the fields, no way to get
around them) and shot them down like at a firing

range - correcting artillery fire from drones
and city heights. There is nowhere to hide - bare

snow-covered fields and sparse wooded areas.

of burnt-out equipment. The 155th Marines Brigade
as a combat-ready unit no longer exists, as its

losses are such that it is not even possible
to quickly replace them with mobilized units.

Why did the Russian army suffer
such a terrible defeat at Vuhledar?

Geography - such a place to storm in the forehead
on the roads among open fields - complete madness.

The superiority of the AFU in
artillery and the absolute tactical

illiteracy of the Russian commanders.

the Russians - only Soledar area of 12 km,
occupied by the price of monstrous losses,

destroyed to pieces. Bakhmut is holding on, fresh
AFU reserves have arrived there, but the situation

is complicated and controlled. In the direction
of Svatove-Kreminna, the enemy has a tiny advance,

but also at the cost of heavy losses and with
no prospects of breaking through the front.

I understand that February will set a new
record for the number of invaders liquidated.

For the first third of the month already 8460,

which is comparable to the daily loss of the
occupiers of one Battalion tactical group.

I would not be surprised if by the end of the
month enemy losses exceeded 24,000 eliminated.

In the context of such losses, which from month to
month show an increase of up to 20 %, a question

arises: what about compensation for these
very losses? After all, all this biomass,

should be promptly compensated? And if 24 thousand
snowdrops in February will ripen after all,

then the losses of the wounded and prisoners
of war will be up to 70 thousand. In its turn

the mobilization and compensation potential of
the enemy does not exceed 50 thousand per month.

And it looks like the occupants are seriously
freaking out. Otherwise, how else can one

explain their bombing of Snake Island where
there is nobody on it? But they risked the

Su-24 for this case and made a series of bombing
strikes on the island in the night from 10 to 11.

Immediately after that a video of the
alleged strike of the Unmanned Surface

Vehicle on the bridge in Zatoka began
to circulate in the Russian mass media.

This video was immediately picked up by Russian
war correspondents, with bravado, gasps and pride,

stating that if not from the air, then from
the sea, but they would bomb that bridge!

Really?

Since the beginning of the full scale invasion of
Ukraine, the unfortunate bridge in Zatoka has been

subjected to 8 or 9 missile strikes... It is not
usable, then the logical question arises - why?

Why bomb a deserted island? Why aim a surface
drone at a bridge, which has long ceased to

function, for it has turned into a target
in a shooting gallery for drunken shooters?

And the answer is simple.

The Russians just need something
to show they can do something.

No, not in a war zone.

Not on the battlefield. But in a war
against deserted islands and ruined bridges.

So, what is this, if not hysteria?