All language subtitles for Extraordinary.Attorney.Woo.S01E06.WEBRip.x264-ION10

-What's your name?
-Gye Hyang-sim.

It's "Gye," not "Gae."

GUREUM ORPHANAGE

Your daughter's name?

Gye Ha-yun.

Isn't her name so stylish?

I chose Ha-yun because they said
it's a popular name in Korea.

Her surname is odd,

so at least her name doesn't stand out
and she can blend in.

Isn't she heavy? Should we lay
her down on the couch over there?

No.

It's fine.

I'm going to hold her.

She's so sound asleep even though
it's the middle of the afternoon.

I gave her medicine.

Medicine? To your daughter?

If Ha-yun is awake,

she'll try not to be separated from me.

I see.

What's your address?

I'm not abandoning Ha-yun.

You can't put her up for adoption.

I'll be back for her.

All right.

-But first, we need an address--
-Are you taking my words lightly?

I'm not abandoning Ha-yun.

I'm leaving her here temporarily

because I might have
to go to the correctional labor camp.

Correctional labor camp?

I mean prison.

Prison.

Are you by any chance
a North Korean defector?

Don't discriminate Ha-yun because
she's a North Korean defector's daughter

or be mean to her
because she's the daughter of a criminal.

I will be back for her no matter what.

All right.

Mom!

-Mom!
-You can't go alone.

-Mom!
-You can't go.

Mom!

-Ha-yun.
-Mom!

-Mom!
-Mommy…

will be back soon.

Mom, don't leave!

Mom!

Mom!

Mom!

Mom!

Mom!

Mom!

Mom!

Mom!

Mom!

CASE 6
IF I WERE A WHALE…

Right.

-Yes?
-Attorney Jung, you called me?

Yes. Attorney Choi
has a public interest case.

A North Korean defector charged
with injury resulting from robbery.

"A North Korean defector charged
with injury resulting from robbery."

The way I see it, there's not a lot
you can do for the case.

But how should I put this? I think
Attorney Choi is overly passionate.

It seems she's overly empathizing
with the defendant.

So I was thinking
you could take on the case with her

and stop her, like "whoa, whoa."

Like "whoa, whoa"?

Yes, so cool down Attorney Choi so that
she doesn't treat this case emotionally.

Like this.

Whoa, whoa.

-Whoa, whoa.
-Yes, like that.

-Whoa, whoa.
-Whoa, whoa.

Make her relax. Whoa…

All right, get going.

-Whoa…
-Cool her down.

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa.

Come in.

Well…

Did you not come to work
or did you not go home?

"Go home"? What does that mean?

Is it like having a life after work?

The thing that only exists
in fantasies and not in real life?

Well…

Well…

What about you?
Don't you have a lot of work?

Work?

I do have a lot.

My wrists hurt because I typed
for more than ten hours yesterday.

I already have Asperger's syndrome.

But at this rate, I'll probably get
carpal tunnel syndrome too.

I started growing white nose hair
from not getting sleep.

I'm on the public interest case
you were assigned.

The North Korean defector charged
with injury resulting from robbery.

What? Hyang-sim's case?

Hyang-sim?

The defendant's name is Gye Hyang-sim.

I've met her once, and she's really cool.

She's like a tough older sister.

Attorney Jung thinks
you're overly passionate about the case.

That you're overly empathizing
with the defendant.

-Really?
-Yes.

He told me to "whoa, whoa" you.

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa.

Young-woo. Have you ever been
to a detention center?

No. I haven't been to one yet.

Hurry and request visitation.
Let's go meet Hyang-sim.

My goodness.

Attorney Choi.

How have you been?

This is Attorney Woo.

She'll be working on the case with me.

Hello, I am Woo Young-woo
from Hanbada Law Firm.

Whether it's read straight or flipped,
it's still Woo Young-woo.

Kayak, deed, rotator,
noon, racecar, Woo Young-woo.

Right.

Woo Hyang-woo?

What?

-No.
-Why don't we

sit down first?

Okay.

How are you doing in here?
I bet it's tough.

Staying in here?

They feed me and put a roof over my head.

This is like a hotel.

I just miss my daughter, Ha-yun.

That just breaks
my heart a bit, that's all.

Ms. Gye, I heard
you're a North Korean defector,

but why don't you use the dialect?

Comrade Woo Hyang-woo.

Why would you say that to me?
It's been a while since I defected.

Gosh! Detention centers
in South Joseon look like hotels!

Do I have to speak like this
to be a North Korean defector?

Right, I'm sorry.

Should we talk about the case?

Let's start from the beginning
since this is Attorney Woo's first time.

Did you and the victim, Lee Sun-yeong,
know each other before the incident?

No. Lee Sun-yeong
is not a North Korean defector

nor was there a reason
for us to cross paths.

The day I went to get the money
was my first time meeting her.

I only got to know her
because Mom told me about her.

Mom?

Are you referring to the North Korean
defector broker, Choi Yeong-hui?

She's not my real mother
but my foster mother.

We all just call her Mom.

If only Mom had paid back
the money she borrowed from me.

I'll summarize.

Five years ago,

you asked "Mom," the North Korean
defector broker, Choi Yeong-hui,

for the ten million won
she borrowed from you.

Then, rather than
paying you back directly,

Choi Yeong-hui told you that
Lee Sun-yeong had money to give her

and you could get it from her instead.

Yes.

The ten million won debt she owed Mom
was transferred over to me and Jeong-hui.

Jeong-hui?

Ms. Kim Jeong-hui, your accomplice?

Comrade Woo Hyang-woo.

Does your head hurt because
there are too many people involved?

No.

You were friends
with Ms. Kim Jeong-hui, correct?

Well, we aren't really friends.

We came to know each other through Mom.

So I just call her my friend.

She's also a North Korean defector
and is the same age as me.

You were going to split the money with her
once Lee Sun-yeong gave it to you?

Yes! The problem was, would Lee Sun-yeong

just hand us the money
she didn't even give to Mom?

If we wanted to stop her
from lying about not having the money,

we couldn't look like
people she could take advantage of.

Goodness, she doesn't even lock her door.

Is she not afraid?

She's very brave.

Jeong-hui, be on your toes.

She won't give us the money easily.

You can tell how fierce she is
since she didn't even pay Mom back, right?

Speak for yourself. You're way too soft.

There's no one else as fierce as me
on the Korean Peninsula.

Let's go.

Grab one.

Lee Sun-yeong!

Come out right now!

Come out!

Where are you?

You.

Hand over Mom's money!

-What money?
-"What money?"

You pocketed Mom's ten million won
and you're not paying it back.

You.

Where did you hide the money?

Is it in that room?

No.

Please, let it go this one time.
I'm in a difficult situation.

Hey!

Hey, you thieving bitch!

You think we're doing this
because our situation is any better?

Right, step aside!

No, you can't!

Let go!

No. You can't.

What are you doing?

Hey, let go!

Let go of me!

-Darn it.
-Hey!

Lee Sun-yeong, just hand over the money!

Gosh, it's so loud.
I've had enough of this.

Hello? Is this the police?

-I don't have the money!
-This is 52 Dongbaek-gil.

The people upstairs are being loud again!

I can't sleep. Please hurry.

Gosh.

Let go!

The police came because the landlord
who lived below the victim reported it.

Then you and Ms. Kim Jeong-hui
were arrested on-site, right?

To be honest,
we didn't beat her up that much.

But the police saw shattered glass,

a stick rolling around, and a stone brick,

so it must've seemed pretty severe.

At the time, you applied
for a jury trial with Ms. Kim Jeong-hui.

Ms. Kim Jeong-hui appeared in court

and received a four-year sentence
for injury resulting from robbery,

but you fled before the trial.

Why did you do that?

Four years…

Then Jeong-hui must be out already.

Yes, probably.

Why did you run away?

Jeong-hui doesn't have any kids.

But I have a daughter.

Ha-yun was only
three years old at the time.

If I got sent to the correctional labor
camp, she would've been abandoned.

I'm a North Korean defector,

so we have no one.

Mom's not my real mom.

And my friend isn't my real friend.

Ha-yun's dad passed away from a car
accident soon after she was born.

Without me, there wouldn't have been
anyone to take care of my daughter.

What about now?

Where's Ha-yun now?

I left her at the orphanage.

Then I went to the police station.

Couldn't you have left her
at an orphanage five years ago?

If I left her then,
Ha-yun would've forgotten about me

because she was too young.

She's eight now,
so when I go back to get her,

she'll remember her mom.

Did you run away so that you could
raise her until she reached an age

where she could remember her mother?

Yes.

And now, Ha-yun has to attend school,

so she can't keep living
as the daughter of a fugitive.

It's only right that I hurry
and go to prison and return.

Like a mother whale.

What?

The maternal instincts of a whale
are famous for their devotion.

They have to be.

Because there aren't that many
safe places in the ocean to raise babies.

How did you get by after you ran away?

In those five years, you wouldn't
have received national subsidies

and it would've been
difficult to get a job.

I cleaned at a motel,

got a spare room,
and lived there with Ha-yun.

I feel bad

when I think about that.

Other kids go to kindergarten

and daycare centers.

But Ha-yun was stuck
in a motel room all day

because I was her mom.

I'm sure she was happy
because she was with her mom.

You think so?

Would she really think that?

Yes, she would have.

I was wondering

if I get a four-year sentence
like Jeong-hui,

could you come visit at least once?

I know you must be busy,

but just once with Ha-yun.

Don't be so weak-minded!
There will be no four-year sentence.

Ms. Gye Hyang-sim must get probation!

We will do everything in our power
to get the defendant probation.

That was passionate.

Does the defendant
have some kind of irresistible charm?

Because it seems that everyone
she encounters becomes so heated.

What happened to the "whoa, whoa" mission?

For an attorney,

defending this charge
is as difficult as defending murder.

Any guess as to why?

-Because the statutory penalty is high?
-Correct.

What is the statutory penalty
for injury resulting from robbery?

A life sentence or at least
seven years of imprisonment.

To repeat, at least seven years.

What's the maximum amount that can be
reduced at the discretion of the judge?

Mitigation of punishments
in extenuating circumstances

cannot exceed
the range of statutory mitigation,

and with a fixed sentence, it is limited
to half of the term of imprisonment,

so at least 3 years and 6 months.

However, to get probation, the sentence
has to be less than three years.

So if you don't find reasons for not only
mitigation in extenuating circumstances

but also statutory mitigation
to get it reduced even more,

you won't be able to get probation.

That's why they say injury resulting from
robbery always ends up with prison time.

And on top of that,
the defendant ran away.

If anything, that could
lead to additional punishment.

All right.

This case is quite odd.

We haven't even started,
but the answers are already there.

It's as if the defendant
already had her trial.

Because there was an accomplice?

Yes.

Ms. Gye Hyang-sim and Ms. Kim Jeong-hui's
issues are almost identical.

By being tried first,
Ms. Kim Jeong-hui already

claimed everything that could be claimed

and everything that could be dismissed
has already been dismissed.

And the answer…

was a four-year sentence.

Ms. Gye Hyang-sim testified that she only
held onto the victim's clothes

and hit her a couple of times.

What if we claim that this can't be
legally seen as bodily harm?

Here. The victim was hurt badly.
What are you talking about?

But sir,

seeing this now,
her injuries are too severe.

The defendant has a small frame.

Of course, her accomplice
might be a bit bigger,

but even so, two women
hit her with their bare hands.

And they were arrested by the police
not long after they arrived there.

They wouldn't have had much time
to cause injuries that severe.

All right. I guess it's necessary
to look into what really happened.

Yes. And we plan on meeting with the
attorney who defended Ms. Kim Jeong-hui.

There could be something from
the earlier trial that they had missed.

Okay, it's not a bad idea,

but time is the most important
resource to an attorney.

Balance it well so you don't spend
too much time on this one case.

-I will.
-Yes, I understand.

Get her to cool down.

I will.

Hey, Min-woo.

I'm going to tell you a story.

There's this person.

There's a person.

And I think I'm making

that person think

that I don't like the person.

When you actually do like the person?

Yes.

What's the matter?
Just tell the person how you feel.

But…

it's not that simple.

Why?

Is it an office romance?

Hey.

What is there to worry about when
you're the most popular guy at Hanbada?

Hey, Jun-ho.
Just give them each a number first.

Number one, two, and three.

-And date all of them in order.
-You're talking nonsense.

Forget it.

I'm not talking to you.
Hand me the bottle.

-Is the person an attorney?
-Hey.

Does that matter?

It's just someone

who I see often.

Goodness! She's in litigation?

Jeez, let me see.

It can't be Woo Young-woo.

Gosh! I told you to forget it.

You.

You know what?

You're an idiot.

You're an idiot
who's only focused on who it is.

Forget it. Just go to sleep.

I'm just trying to help you.

But I can only help if I know who it is.

Hey, tell me.

Jun-ho.

I actually know everything though.

I can see what's going on.

Choi…

You heard what the judge said, right?
You have to come here again in two weeks.

-Yes.
-Okay.

Give me some change, will you?
I don't have money to get home.

Here we go again.

Why do you need money to get home
when you don't even have a home?

Go on.

Attorney Kwon Ju-ho?

I'm Choi Su-yeon. I contacted you.

This is Attorney Woo Young-woo.

Hanbada?

Yes, I contacted you because
of a case you were on five years ago.

The one for Ms. Gye Hyang-sim
and Ms. Kim Jeong-hui.

I have another trial.
Should we talk on my way there?

Yes.

Did Ms. Gye Hyang-sim resurface?

At the time,
she fled without going on trial.

Yes, that's right.

But I'm not sure if I'd be of any help.

It's a case from five years ago,
so I don't really remember much.

Besides, public defenders
take on so many cases

that it's like we work on cases
just to get them out of the way.

Doesn't that make
you wish you had done something?

Perhaps something you wanted to look into

or things that you had
no choice but to pass over.

I'm not sure.

Ms. Gye Hyang-sim's frame
is on the smaller side.

How was Ms. Kim Jeong-hui?

Her size?

From what I recall, they were both small.

These are pictures taken of the victim
at the time of the incident.

Do you remember?

Aren't these injuries too severe

to be the outcome of two small women
in such a short period?

You're right.

But, you do know

that the most powerful and hardest
to flip in a criminal trial is…

Is?

A doctor's diagnosis.

But if you think about it,

most of the diagnoses
used in criminal trials

are clinical speculation
written based on what the patient says.

So not many of them have objective
test results to back them up.

Which is why it's natural for there
to be questionable and ambiguous parts,

but it's usually difficult to refute.

Right.

Now that I think of it,
I think the doctor was a bit biased.

The doctor?

The doctor who wrote
the diagnosis for the victim.

A while after the trial,
I was reading the newspaper

and coincidentally
saw a piece that he wrote.

It was about North Korean defectors.
How should I put this?

The content seemed to be biased
against North Korean defectors.

Do you remember the title of the piece?

Just a moment, let me look it up.

Here it is.

"A Korean woman who was assaulted
by North Korean defectors came to see me."

He's talking about this case.

I felt a bit bitter after reading this.

In a case where all the defendants
were North Korean defectors,

I thought, "Why did it have to be a person
like him who wrote the diagnosis?"

Lee Sun-yeong's house is…

Lee Sun-yeong's house
is on the second floor, right?

Yes, should we go up?

Yes.

Damn it.

This damn household.

Where are you going?

Let go.

Let go!

Young-woo, are you okay?

You can't take that money!

Damn it, you brat.

Don't be so dramatic.

We have to call the police.

-I can't deal with this anymore.
-Hold on.

I think someone's already making a call.

Is this the police?
This is 52 Dongbaek-gil.

I'm about to go mad
because of how loud they are upstairs!

Hurry and send someone over.

It happens far too often.

Hurry!

Ms. Lee Sun-yeong.

Ms. Lee Sun-yeong.

We're attorneys representing
Ms. Gye Hyang-sim.

We would like to talk to you.

If I die early,

-Ms. Lee Sun-yeong.
-it's because of the man upstairs.

Breaking, smashing
and throwing things every day.

I might die soon
because my heart keeps trembling.

I wanted to kick them out
in whatever way I could,

but I pity the wife who gets beaten up.

And before I knew it,
it's been five tiresome years!

So did you call the police
every time they were like that?

I did.

Do you think that wife-beating punk
listens to me when I try to stop him?

But he calms down
when the police get here.

Even if it's only for a little while.

Then you must've called
the police on them five years ago too.

Of course!

So when I call and just
give them my address now,

the precinct sends the police to me

as if they're delivering jjajangmyeon.

Where's Lee Sun-yeong? Did you meet her?

No, there's no answer.

Gosh, do you think
she'd want to show her face

when she gets beaten up
by her husband like that?

I'm sick of this.

I think the landlord called the police
whenever there was a ruckus.

Then wouldn't there be records
of her reports before the incident too?

You're right. We should
secure the report records.

-Are you…
-Young-woo.

Please text me after you send it.

All right.

My goodness.

What do you think about Jun-ho?

-What?
-How do you feel about Jun-ho as a man?

You must have
a lot of free time these days.

I really think the person
Jun-ho likes is you, Attorney Choi.

What?

Works at Hanbada,

an attorney on the litigation team,
and someone who he sees often.

That's Choi Su-yeon.

Why?

You don't like Jun-ho
because he's not an attorney?

Did Jun-ho say something about me?

To you?

I mean,

we live together so we talk
about a lot of things together.

Are you curious?

No.

Therefore, we would like to summon
the victim, Lee Sun-yeong, as a witness.

Your Honor,

the victim already completed
cross-examination

at the trial five years ago.

Summoning the victim once again
as a witness is unnecessary and unfair.

The defendant ran away
and then came back as she pleased,

what right does she have
to make the victim come and go?

This is secondary--

It is the people's basic right
to get a fair trial.

Is the defendant who fled
and came back not a citizen of Korea?

-The victim--
-Just a moment.

What is your family origin?

-Excuse me?
-Your family origin. Your surname.

Right. It is the Woo family of Danyang.

Danyang is in Chungcheongbuk-do, right?

But why are you in such a rush that
you're cutting off other people's words?

That's very unlike someone
from Chungcheong-do.

-Excuse me?
-Cutting people off doesn't look good.

Don't do it.

In this courtroom
where I am the presiding judge,

cutting people off is prohibited.

Right. Okay.

Your Honor, with all due respect,

isn't your family origin
the Ryu family of Pungsan?

How did you know?

The Ryu family of Pungsan
is one with a long and rich history,

located in Andong Hahoe
Folk Village, right?

You just give off that kind of impression.

Is that so?

My family origin
is the Kim family of Andong,

and since Pungsan is a part of the city
of Andong, broadly speaking,

we are from the same hometown.

Yes, that's true.

Yes.

Nice to meet you.

Yes, nice to meet you.

Your Honor, about summoning the victim,
Lee Sun-yeong, as a witness--

What is your family origin, Attorney?

Your Honor.

You just cut another person off
while she was speaking.

I beg your pardon?

In this courtroom
where you are the presiding judge,

cutting people off is prohibited.

It is against the rules.

From now until the trial is over,

attorneys must raise their hands
if they have something to say.

You cannot speak without my permission.

What is it?

Your Honor, my family origin

is the Choi family of Wonju.

Judge Choi Bo-yeon, whose office
is on the same floor as yours,

also originates
from the Choi family of Wonju.

He…

is my father.

What?

You're Chief Judge Choi's daughter?

-Yes.
-Gosh.

Chief Judge Choi
is a dear junior colleague of mine.

We even have dinner together
from time to time.

I heard in passing
that his son is a doctor.

I see his daughter is an attorney.

It seems like he raised his children well.

I envy him.

Thank you.

I will send your regards to him.

Yes, all right.

My goodness.

What were we discussing?

We were discussing the summoning
of the victim as a witness.

Right. Let's do that.

Excuse me?

We're going through with the trial
so we might as well do it properly.

Is there something wrong?

Well…

No, sir.

So, I was right. It is her.

Don't they look good together?

They're such a good-looking match.

Don't you think
Jun-ho likes Attorney Choi?

Right, I guess
you don't drink much coffee.

Actually, rather than coffee…

You don't know much about that, right?

I wonder where my other half is?

The next witness is the victim,
Lee Sun-yeong.

Witness, come out to the front.

ATTORNEYS, DEFENDANT

JURY

PROSECUTOR

"I pledge this."

"I solemnly swear to tell the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth

and agree to receive punishment

in accordance with perjury
should there be any falsehood."

Counselor, you may begin
questioning the witness.

Hold on.

Attorney Choi, you go ahead.

What?

The jury is sympathetic to the victim,
so I don't think we should be too stiff.

Attorney Choi,
you go out there and be gentle.

All right.

Hello, Ms. Sun-yeong.

Hi.

I know it must be hard for you to have
to recall what happened five years ago,

but thank you
for being here today as a witness.

You have a lot of bruises and wounds.

How did you get hurt?

Objection.

This is irrelevant to the case.

How long are you going to
exchange niceties?

Your Honor, please allow me
to question her a bit more.

It's related to the case.

Since she says it's relevant,
we'll keep listening for now.

Overruled.

Could you tell us how you got injured?

Well…

Yes, well…

Did your…

husband hit you?

Objection!

This is irrelevant to the case!

There are police records
that say the police were called

two days before the incident
on November 6th, 2017

as Lee Sun-yeong was
assaulted by her husband.

Differentiating whether her injuries were
caused because of the defendant's assault

or caused by her husband is important.

Please let us check
the factual relationship.

I see what you're saying, Counselor.

So stick to questions about what
happened at the time of the incident.

No more questions about current injuries.

Yes, sir.

I'll ask you again.

Witness, do you recall the police
being called to your house

on November 6th, 2017?

If you're talking about 2017…

that's already five years ago.

I do not recall.

That day, your husband hit you,

so the landlord,
who lives below you, called the police.

Here are the police records.
Do you not recall?

I do not recall.

Pure lies!

Have you gotten dumb from being
beaten up by your husband?

What are you doing? Stop talking!

Defendant, what did you say?

She wasn't beaten by us that much.

Even if we wanted to, we didn't have
the time because the police arrived.

But look at that wretched thing
with her ulterior motive.

She's trying to put all the beatings
she usually gets from her husband

and frame it all on me!

It's all a lie!

Your Honor.

The defendant is insulting the victim,
making a mockery of the court,

and is showing absolutely
no remorse for her wrongdoings!

Yes.

I see that.

You're absolutely right.

Your Honor--

You have to raise your hand first.

What?

In this trial, attorneys
have to raise their hand first

if they have something to say.

We can't speak before the judge
gives us permission to speak.

Why?

I think it's because his family origin
is the Ryu family of Pungsan.

What is it?

Right.

Your Honor, we apologize.

The defendant is not used to trials,
so she lost her control

and said things she didn't mean.

Could we have a recess
so the defendant can settle down?

Prosecution, do you have anything
to ask the witness?

Well…

No.

I don't.

Witness, you may go home.

I will not allow the victim
and the defendant

to meet in this courtroom again.

We'll have a ten-minute recess.

All rise.

Defendant.

Get a hold of yourself!

You can't get in our way.

Get in your way?

You were beating around the bush,

so I pointed it out.

You pointed it out
and look at what happened.

There is an order
and formality in a trial.

This isn't some marketplace fight.

Please help us
go through with our strategy.

Some marketplace fight?

If an attorney does it, it's strategy,
but if I do it, it's a marketplace fight?

What do you think I am?

-Attorney Jung didn't mean it like that.
-Didn't mean it like what?

Are you siding with him
because you're an attorney too?

I did it because I was too frustrated
to just sit still and watch!

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa.

This trial isn't for you
to release your frustration.

It's to get a reduction on your sentence.

Think of your daughter
who is waiting for you at the orphanage.

If you want to see Ha-yun
as quickly as possible,

you have to listen to us.

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa.

Whoa, whoa. Good job.

Stop.

The doctor is next, right?

Yes.

We're lucky if he accepts
without reservation

that the injuries
could've come from the husband.

But if he says otherwise,
we'll have to go in strong too.

Emphasize that the witness
is biased against North Korean defectors

to discredit him.

This time…

Attorney Woo, you go.

Because…

I'm stiff?

Yes. Show us what you got.

Okay.

WITNESS

This is the diagnosis of the injuries

you wrote five years ago
after seeing the victim yourself.

Could you read the underlined part?

Yes.

"Fourteen days of treatment needed

for sprains and strain of the cervical
spine from the date of diagnosis."

"Lacerations and bruises all over the body
due to indiscriminate assault."

"Damage to the hair roots and scalp
caused by excessive pulling of the hair."

What do you think
the cause of these symptoms is?

Right.

The assault by the defendant
sitting over there and her accomplice.

That is all.

Counselor, you may
begin cross-examination.

On November 6th, 2017,
two days before the incident,

the police were called because
Ms. Lee was assaulted by her husband.

When you issued your diagnosis,
were you aware of this fact?

No, I wasn't.

So now that you do, do you think
the injuries of Ms. Lee Sun-yeong

could've been caused by her
husband's assault, not the defendant?

No.

I still think the defendant is to blame.

Why is that?

It's not like the name of the person
responsible is written on injuries.

I can tell by looking at the injuries.

Because I'm a doctor.

Could you explain how you know
based on medical facts?

I've already given
a doctor's opinion as a doctor.

What more do I have to do

if you ask me to base it on
even more medical facts?

-Push him into a corner.
-Okay.

Early 2018.

You wrote this piece for a newspaper.
Could you please read the title out loud?

Objection.

This is irrelevant to the case.

-Speak.
-The first sentence of this piece is,

"A Korean woman who was assaulted
by North Korean defectors came to see me."

The piece directly mentions the incident,
which means this piece is relevant.

Objection overruled.

Counselor, continue.

Witness, please read
the title of the piece.

Your Honor.

Could I not talk about this?

Are you refusing to testify?

For what reason?

I've received a lot of hatred
and criticism after I wrote this.

I received hate comments,
phone complaints,

and even threatening letters.

Unfortunately, none of those fall
under the reasons for refusal to testify.

Read the title of the piece.

"North Korean defectors
are becoming a criminal group."

The witness argues
that "in Korean society,

North Korean defectors
are already a huge issue,"

and that "the government giving
North Korean defectors funds to settle

is like providing criminals
with an incentive for criminal acts."

Is this correct?

I mean…

Well,

I'm not biased or anything like that.
The statistics speak for themselves.

Do you have any idea what the violent
crime rate of North Korean defectors is?

As much as ten percent.

More than twice the average
crime rate of South Koreans.

The rate of second offenders
is also more than five times as much.

Do you still think that North Korean
defectors aren't a criminal group?

So then, is your opinion on being
able to tell who caused the injury

just by looking at the victim's injury

unrelated to your usual thoughts
about North Korean defectors?

What?

You're saying

the defendant is more at fault
than the victim's husband, correct?

Because the husband is South Korean,

but the defendant
is a North Korean defector.

Objection. Leading.

Sustained.

But honestly,

is it right to make an abusive husband
out of a normal South Korean man

just to do something good
for North Korean defectors?

What?

This trial is done
with the tax paid by the citizens.

So the trial should protect them,
not that North Korean defector!

Take it easy. The jury is on our side now.

While I respect your opinion,

North Korean defectors
are citizens of South Korea as well.

That's why we're having this trial.

Yes, well…

That's right.

You're eating?

You messed things up, yet you're eating?

How can you eat, you idiot?

-What's wrong with you? Are you crazy?
-You're the one who's crazy.

Do you have any idea how hard
I worked to get the GRD as our client?

The GRD?

Yes, you punk!

The Group of Righteous Doctors,
the GRD! You blew it!

You put Kwon Byeong-gil
on the witness stand

without knowing that
he's an executive of the GRD?

Do you know what I had to deal
with from the Chairman just now?

You don't!

Kwon Byeong-gil said
he didn't want to talk about the piece.

But the attorneys at Hanbada
insisted that he talk about it!

Gosh.

Gosh!

Is this because of a public interest case
you're doing with the rookies?

Myeong-seok.

How could someone with your level
of experience make such a mistake?

How could you cost us a client

who's worth billions
over some mere public interest case?

Okay, I understand. You can stop now.

The one peer I have

that should be helping me
is bringing harm to me instead!

Gosh, this is so annoying!

I'm the only one worried about the firm!

I'm sorry for not running
a background check on the witness.

I'm sorry for making you
lose a client that's worth billions.

It's nothing for rookies to apologize for.

It's my mistake.

It's my fault and I'm really
embarrassed right now.

But let's not think of it as

"some mere public interest case"
or "some mere North Korean defector."

Let's work hard even if it's not a case

that's worth billions of won.

Yes.

Yes.

All right.

Finish your food.

I'm going to go because I'm embarrassed.

ESTABLISHMENT OF LAW AND ORDER

-Mom!
-Ha-yun.

-Mom!
-Ha-yun.

Mom!

Mom!

Mommy's sorry.

Mom.

Mommy's sorry, Ha-yun.

Ha-yun.

You're doing well!

You did great.

Let's eat the gimbap.

WHITE 480, BLUE 680

EXCELLENCE AWARD, EFFORT AWARD
CONCESSION AWARD

FAMILY SPORTS DAY WITH DREAMS AND HOPE

Here, Young-woo. Have some fruit.

No.

My son is too handsome.

Young-woo? Here, hold it.

-Dad.
-Yes?

Why don't I have a mom?

The statutory penalty for injury resulting
from robbery is too high.

Murder is five years at the least.

It doesn't make sense
for this charge to be seven years.

Why don't we file for an adjudication
on the constitutionality of the law?

If the Constitutional Court
finds this to be unconstitutional,

Hyang-sim can be acquitted.

That already happened a few times before.

In 2001, 2006, and 2016.

And? They all didn't work?

Yes, they were seen
as being constitutional.

A North Korean defector
is technically a kind of refugee, right?

Aren't there any laws that are generous
to refugees, immigrants, or foreigners?

No.

Think carefully. Is there really nothing?

There's none.
And there shouldn't be anything like that.

It's like giving a criminal license
to refugees, immigrants, or foreigners.

Then what else could there be?

Young-woo, you're a genius.

Think of something!

It is a bit far-fetched,
but there is one I can think of.

What is it?

It's North Korean law.

North Korean law?

Yes, there is robbery
in North Korea as well.

Article 288 of North Korean criminal law.
Robbery of personal property.

"Someone who has robbed personal property

by means of assault
or threat to a person's life or health

will be sentenced to a maximum of
four years in a correctional labor camp."

But according to Criminal Law

published by the Kim Il Sung
University Publishers,

North Korea's crime of robbery,
in comparison to South Korea,

requires a high level of intensity
in the assault and threats.

The assault should be intense enough
to kill or seriously injure

and threats should be one of assault
that will result in immediate death

or serious injuries

unless the victim does not comply
with the criminal's requests.

If the assault and threats
do not meet these standards,

the crime of robbery cannot be established

and it would merely fall under
the crime of stealing personal property.

A crime of stealing personal property?

"Article 284 of North Korean
criminal law."

"A crime of stealing personal property."

"Someone who has stolen
personal property will be sentenced

to a maximum of one year
of labor discipline."

Your Honor, please focus on the sentence.

Robbery of personal property

is a maximum of four years
of correctional labor camp.

In other words, a maximum
of four years of imprisonment.

But the sentence
for stealing personal property

is a maximum of one year
of labor discipline.

In South Korea, this would merely
be a sentence of a maximum

of one year of community service.

That's enough lecture on North Korean law.

So what are you trying to claim?

The defendant is more
used to North Korean law

than she is to South Korean law.

The defendant only tried to get back
the money she was supposed to get.

There was no intention to rob the money
by oppressing the victim's free will.

Moreover, she did not think
that she would be

sentenced to a life sentence

or a minimum of seven years
of imprisonment because of her action.

Because in North Korea,

the defendant's actions aren't enough
to establish the crime of robbery.

So the attorneys are claiming

that since the defendant thought
"this isn't robbery in North Korea,

so I'm not committing robbery."

Is that what you're saying?

Your Honor, this is the most unprecedented
logic that's ever been heard.

It's true that it's unprecedented.

But perhaps we should look into it.

Defendant.

Did you think your action wasn't robbery

because you were more
used to North Korean law?

Well…

Yes.

Is that so?

What were you going to do
if the victim didn't hand you the money?

Didn't you think of getting it
even if you had to force her?

Your Honor…

Your Honor.

Could you please
once again notify the defendant

of her right to refuse to testify?

Of course.

Defendant, you don't have to answer.

But I would like to ask
so we can have a fair trial.

Defendant, could you respond?

I went there

to get it at all costs.

That was my money.

Yes.

Well…

What do you think of
what the attorneys claimed just now?

Did you really think that you should
threaten the victim only enough

so that robbery wouldn't be established
according to North Korean law?

I'm not sure.

I honestly don't know

all that about North Korean law.

I see.

That is all.

All right, that concludes the defense.

Juries, please start your review.

I will give a verdict after that.

All rise.

I'm headed back to the office.
Are you coming with me?

I'll stay for the verdict.

Me, too.

Okay, then.

Stay with the defendant until the end.

No matter the result,
you two did your best.

Attorney comrades.

Why the long face?

She doesn't mean it literally.

I'm sorry.

Gosh, what are you sorry for?

Then

has it already been decided

that I'll be sent to prison?

No. Get some rest
and we'll see you at the verdict.

Come this way.

There's a claim that we haven't tried yet.

Adjudication on the
constitutionality of the law.

What?

You said other people tried it

and they were seen
as being constitutional.

Wait.

Young-woo!

Hey!

Where are you going?

The jurors are already reviewing.
What can you do at this point?

The verdict hasn't been given yet.

Then we can still request
the resumption of the hearing.

We're going to go meet the judge.

You can't enter the judge's chambers
without a visitor's permit.

We can ask for visitor's permits.

They don't just give it to you.

You need the judge's permission.

Do you think he'll give you permission?

Hey!

Hello, we're attorneys. We would
like to visit one of the judges' chambers.

-Which one?
-Ryu--

Chief Judge Choi Bo-yeon's
chambers on the eighth floor.

What's the purpose of your visit?

Is he expecting you?

It's a personal errand.

Judge Choi Bo-yeon is my father.

This is my colleague
and we're here for an errand.

Just a moment.

This is the access desk.

A woman who says she's
Judge Choi's daughter is hoping to visit

and I was wondering
if this was prearranged.

Your name?

Choi Su-yeon.

Attorney Choi Su-yeon.

Yes. All right.

Write down your name and purpose
of visit here, and you can go in.

SUPREME COURT OF KOREA

Do you know what all that's for?

To prevent people like us.

To stop people from trying to plead their
case to a judge outside the courtroom.

We're not trying to plead our case
to the judge outside the courtroom.

We're just trying to request
the resumption of the hearing.

Would the prosecutor see it that way?

I can't believe I let Wild Card
Woo Young-woo talk me into this.

Excuse me.

We're here to see Judge Ryu Myeong-ha!

Who are you?

What is this?

How did you get in here?

Your Honor. We would like to request
the resumption of the hearing.

Don't you know the juries
are reviewing right now?

We do. But we had
no choice but to come see you,

even though we knew it was rude.

It's too late for us to submit a request
form for a resumption of the hearing.

No.

If you're not satisfied
with something, you can appeal.

What is it?

The defendant ultimately
never got the money from the victim.

It's unconstitutional for this to be on
trial for injury resulting from robbery.

Please allow for the resumption
of the hearing.

Attempted injury resulting from robbery
does not mean robbery was attempted.

There must be an attempt to cause injury

in order for this charge
to be established.

Isn't there room
for a different interpretation?

An attempted injury resulting from robbery
charge is more favorable to the defendant

than an injury resulting
from robbery charge.

And criminal law prohibits
any reduced interpretation of a law

that is favorable
to the defendant without reason.

Are you going to trial
because you don't want to yield?

Are you saying little strokes
don't fell great oaks?

First, you claimed the victim's injuries
are not the defendant's fault.

Then you bring up North Korean law to say
there wasn't any intention in the robbery.

Now, it's unconstitutional
for the defendant to be tried

for injury resulting from robbery
because she didn't get the money?

Are you kidding me?

Darn it.

CHIEF JUDGE RYU MYEONG-HA

I understand you're passionate
as young attorneys.

However,

there is a time and place
to be passionate.

It's not because we're young attorneys.

It's because Ms. Gye Hyang-sim
is a great mother.

Like a mother whale.

What?

Ms. Gye Hyang-sim lacks common sense
and does whatever she pleases.

Even now, it doesn't seem like
she fully understands what she did wrong.

But Ms. Gye Hyang-sim
chose to be a fugitive for five years

to not abandon her child.

Maternal instinct is not
a reason for mitigation,

but I beg you to think of
the circumstance of a great mother

who thought she had to raise
her daughter before going to prison

so that she would be old enough
to remember her mother

once she was released.

This is an argument made out of court.

I'm not going to hear any more of this
or reflect it on the verdict.

I won't allow for the resumption
of the hearing either.

If you both don't leave right now,
I will call a bailiff.

The most famous way of hunting whales
is to kill the baby first.

They throw a harpoon at the weak baby,

and as the baby
is swimming around in pain,

the mother never leaves its side.

She can't abandon her baby
that is in pain.

That's when

the second harpoon is thrown

at the mother that is the ultimate target.

Humans.

Whales are intelligent.

She knows that she will also be killed
if she doesn't abandon her baby.

But she never does.

If I were a whale,

would my mom not have abandoned me?

All rise.

Be seated.

Jury, did you finish up the review?

Will you hand me the written verdict?

I will announce the jury's review.

On the charges.

By unanimous decision of the
indictment of all seven jurors, guilty.

Opinion on sentencing.

By unanimous decision
of the indictment of all seven jurors,

four years of imprisonment.

Thank you, members of the jury.

This court sincerely
respects the jury's verdict.

Now, for the verdict.

Stand up.

Formal adjudication.

The defendant is sentenced to one year
and nine months of imprisonment.

However, the execution
of the sentence against the defendant

is suspended for three years
following the date of the verdict.

The court orders
that the defendant be on probation

and 80 hours of community service.

What is he saying?

Probation!

What?

Probation…

The nature of this crime
offending as the defendant colluded

with an accomplice
and assaulted and threatened the victim

with the intention
to take property by force.

Considering the fear the victim
must've felt during the crime

and how the defendant fled
after the crime without being tried,

it is necessary
to punish the defendant severely.

However, considering that the defendant

is not used to South Korean laws and
regulations as a North Korean defector,

a first-time offender
without a criminal record,

and most importantly…

although it has been five years,

she has confessed
without forgetting her crimes,

with the intent of receiving punishment.

Thus, the court is taking into
account these special sentencing factors.

Right.

Confession.

Yes, she confessed.

That's right.

Sentencing elements that are advantageous
or disadvantageous to the defendant…

We were focused on something else
that we forgot Hyang-sim had confessed.

Confession is the most basic reason
for mitigation. I can't believe we forgot.

We're idiots.

Perhaps the judge is the smart one.

The cleverness of a veteran.

"The cleverness of a veteran."

Through a trial by jury,

following the law regarding
juries in criminal trials,

the ruling is as the formal adjudication.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Mom, put that down.

Look at this. Isn't it so pretty?

Gosh, it's too short for me.
You try it on.

-Mom, try it on.
-It looks good on you.

Just this once.

No, this is too expensive.

Come on, I'll get it for you.

The headquarters has been marketing
toward the younger generation,

so we have more customers
who bring their daughters with them.

I see.

Do you have a daughter?

No, just a son.

I see.

Then you must be envious whenever
you see a mother and daughter shopping.

It's not too late for you
to have a daughter.

Just stand by me and look.

It's very expensive
to buy that brand at full price.

If I miss this sale,
I'll never be able to buy it, okay?

What?

-You should buy one too.
-I'm fine.

Buy a bag. Stop using
the same one every day.

I don't like department stores.

You're going to like them now.

This is exciting.

What are you doing?

Let's go.

Again?

-I still have more things to see.
-Let's go home.

Why?

It's splitting the town in half
and isolating each side.

It's not a neighborhood
that can just disappear like that.

Are these all materials on Haengbok-ro?

That's Attorney Tae Su-mi, right?

-Why is the king here herself?
-"King"?

-I think Jun-ho likes you.
-It's not easy for someone to like me.

-Does your heart pound like crazy?
-There was a time when it did.

You totally like him!

I want to check whether or not I like you.

Subtitle translation by: Hyun-soo Cho