Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
1
In this video we're talking about how to use you substitution indefinite integrals.
2
And then this particular problem we've been given the integral from 0 to 4 of X times the squared of
3
x squared plus nine.
4
So we need to evaluate this integral and we're going to need to use substitution in order to do it.
5
If we use your substitution we have to set you equal to x squared plus nine the value underneath the
6
square root.
7
And then d you if we take the derivative of you with respect to x we're going to get D U is equal to
8
2 x plus 0.
9
So just to X and then we multiply by d X. If we divide both sides by 2 x to solve for dx we get d x
10
is equal to d u over 2 x.
11
And I'm not going to focus so much on the substitution part in particular or why we picked x squared
12
plus nine for you.
13
What I want to focus on is two different ways to handle the limits of integration because we have a
14
definite integral.
15
So we can do this one of two ways.
16
We can leave the limits of integration as they are these limits of integration are in terms of x.
17
You can even think of them as X equals for four and X equals zero.
18
So these limits of integration refer to the variable x.
19
When we make a substitution and we change this function so that in terms of you instead of in terms
20
of x we can leave the limits of integration as they are.
21
But we need to remember that there in terms of x so we should write them as X equals four and X equals
22
zero.
23
And then at the end of the problem we'll have to back substitute to get the function back in terms of
24
x so we can plug in these limits of integration that refer to X or alternately when we change the function
25
so that it's in terms of you instead of X we can also change the limits of integration so that they
26
are in terms of you instead of in terms of x and then we'll be able to evaluate over the interval directly
27
because our limits of integration and our function will both refer to you.
28
And now become more clear as we work through this and going to work through the problem in two ways.
29
The first way is when we leave the limits of integration in terms of x.
30
The second way is when we leave the limits of integration in terms of you.
31
So in both cases we're going to make the substitution for x squared plus nine equals you and DXi equals
32
Do you over 2 x into the integral.
33
So in this first integral here what we would need to say is instead of just 0 to 4 we would need to
34
say X equals zero to X equals 4 we'll say X times the square root of you since we said you as equals
35
x squared plus 9 and X we know is d u over 2 x so we get you over to X. If we simplify this integral
36
what we see is that we get X to cancel here and the numerator with X and the denominator.
37
This 2 in the denominator is a one half that we can move outside of the integral.
38
So we end up with 1 1/2 times the integral from X equals zero to X equals four of the squared of you
39
which is the same as you to the 1 1/2 power D.
40
You then reduce that our integral our function inside the integral here.
41
Everything's in terms of you we have you to the one half do you.
42
That's why we had to say X equals zero and exit was for.
43
If we're going to leave our limits of integration as 0 and 4 we have to indicate that they refer to
44
the variable x and not to the variable you.
45
So now we would do is just evaluate this integral we know that the integral of you you're the one half
46
is you to the three.
47
Hobson we add one to the exponent 1 1/2 plus 1 gives us three halves.
48
Then we divide it by the new exponent dividing by three halves is the same as multiplying by two thirds
49
so we multiply by two thirds.
50
We still have our one half out in front here and then we can say we're evaluating this whole thing over
51
the interval X equals zero to X equals 4.
52
Because this is still in terms of you we have to still indicate that our limits of integration are with
53
respect to x and not you.
54
Here we can get 2 in the denominator to cancel with two in the numerator so that's going to leave us
55
with one third you to the three halves power over the interval X equals zero to X equals four.
56
And now because of limits of integration are still in terms of x but our function is in terms of you
57
because we didn't change those limits of integration.
58
We need to back substitute to get you in terms of x where we know that you as equal to x squared plus
59
nine.
60
So we're going to plug back in for you and we're going to say one third time's the quantity x squared
61
plus nine raised to the three halves power.
62
And now because this function is back in terms of x we can drop the X equals here and just say we're
63
evaluating over the interval 0 4 because it's implied that since we have our function here in terms
64
of x if we just written 0 to four then these limits of integration are with respect to x in the same
65
way that we just had limits of integration zero to 4 on the original integral which was in terms of
66
x and then we would just evaluate over the interval so we would plug in for first and we would get one
67
third times four squared which is 16.
68
Sixteen plus nine is 25.
69
So we would get 25 to the three halves power minus whatever we get when we plug in zero sum minus one
70
third times zero squared is zero plus nine is nine.
71
So 9 raised to the three halves power we can rewrite this we can say ONE-THIRD 25 to the three halves
72
is the same thing as 25 to one half then raised to the third because only of exponents like this we
73
multiply the exponents together and one half times three gives us three halves which is our original
74
exponent down here.
75
So we can split up the xponent this way and that's useful because then 25 to the one half is the same
76
as the square root of 25 so we can call this value 5.
77
But anyway we're going to say minus one third and the nine to the three halves is the same as nine to
78
the one half raised to the third.
79
So then we say one third the square root of 25 is five five to the third power is 125.
80
Here we have minus one third to the one half of the squared of nine is three three to the third is twenty
81
seven.
82
So we end up with 125 over three minus 27 over three which leaves us with ninety eight over three.
83
So we can go ahead and say Here our answer is ninety eight over three.
84
And now if we we're going to do this where we change our limits of integration so that they are in terms
85
of you will be able to avoid this back substitution step that we did at the bottom here.
86
So here's what that would look like.
87
We would make the same substitution we would have the integral here we would keep our X and then we
88
would say the square root of instead of x squared plus nine we said you is x squared plus 9 so we get
89
the squared of you.
90
And then we replace X with do you over to X so do you over to X the same thing that we had here in our
91
first integral.
92
But our limits of integration we want to change them so that they're in terms of you instead of in terms
93
of x the way that we do that is we want to get a value for you.
94
When x is equal to zero our lower limit of integration.
95
So all we do is we take X equals zero and we plug it into our equation here for you.
96
So we get you is equal to plugging zero and for x we get zero squared plus nine so zero squared plus
97
nine which is of course equal to nine when we plug in X equals 4 we get you is equal to 4 squared plus
98
9 or you is equal to 9:16 which is 25.
99
So these limits of integration are with respect to the variable you.
100
They're the same as our original limits of integration zero to four except they apply to the variable
101
you instead of the variable x.
102
So what we can say then is 9 to 25 because when we cancel here the X in the numerator with the X in
103
the denominator and we pull the one half out in front.
104
We have 1 1/2 times the integral from 9 to 25 of the squirt of you which is the same as you to the 1
105
1/2 power times do you.
106
So now notice here compared these two integrals that are side by side.
107
They're exactly the same.
108
The only thing that's different is the limits of integration because this function over here on the
109
right is in terms of you and these limits of integration 9 to 25 are in terms of you we can just go
110
out and state the limits of integration 9 and 25 because when there's no designation you equals or X
111
equals.
112
It implies that these limits of integration are with respect to the variable that's inside the integral.
113
But here because these limits of integration are with respect to x and the function was in terms of
114
view we had to say X equals to indicate that these limits of integration did not match the function
115
the way we took care of that was by back substituting for you down here we took out you and we put back
116
in x squared plus nine.
117
So our limits of integration would match.
118
But here because we've changed the function and the limits of integration we won't have to do the back
119
substitution step.
120
So we'll just integrate we'll keep the one half out in front and again we'll get you to the three halves
121
when we add one to one half then we'll divide by the new exponent three has which is the same as multiplying
122
by two thirds.
123
And we're going to be evaluating this on the interval 9 to 25.
124
So again we cancel and we end up with one third times you to the three halves over the interval nine
125
to 25.
126
Now if you'll notice here we're going to end up in the same situation we ended up in before we're going
127
to play in our upper limit of integration first 25.
128
So we'll get 25 to the three halves which is the same as 25 to the one half raised to the third power
129
again.
130
So 25 to one half is the squared of 25 which is 5 5 raised to the third power or five cubed is 125.
131
So we end up with one 25 times one third or 125 over three.
132
Then we want to subtract whatever we get.
133
We plug in nine.
134
So again nine of the three halves power is the same as the square root of 9 which is three raise to
135
the third which is 27.
136
So we end up with 27 times one third or 27 over three and you can see that again we end up with 98 over
137
three which has the same value that we got when we did it the other way here when we didn't change the
138
limits of integration.
139
But we back substituted instead.
140
So the conclusion is that it really doesn't matter which way you evaluate a definite well with your
141
substitution you can leave the limits of integration in terms of the original variable as long as you
142
back substitute for the original variable.
143
At the end of the problem before you plug in your original limits of integration or if you prefer you
144
can do this step where you find new limits of integration and then you just evaluate over those new
145
limits of integration and you don't have to do the back substitution.
146
So it's really up to you whatever you're more comfortable with.
147
Whatever's easier is fine because they're both going to give you the same answer.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.