Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Today I will not talk about Kherson and what is happening there,
namely : Russiaโs statements about surrender of the city and withdrawal of troops,
their destruction of all remaining bridges and the probable death of Gauleiter Kherson. Too
much uncertainty at the moment, so today we will return to Crimea, or rather the Crimean bridge.
Reviewing the incident at the Crimean Bridge, I noted that an important point in the destruction
of this facility was that the efficiency of logistics supply by rail from Russia,
transit through the territory of Crimea to the Southern bridgehead will be reduced.
I note that the railroad connection and supply of occupants to their units by rail is a much
higher priority than control of roads. When invading Ukraine, especially in the East,
they moved by sticking to the railroads first, and then spreading their tentacles along the roads.
Without a railroad connection, they are unable to effectively supply their troops.
On the other hand, objectively, the Crimean bridge incident affected the supply of the
Southern bridgehead, initially not critically. After all, the temporarily occupied Crimean
peninsula was literally stuffed with Russian equipment. For example, only in the area of
Armyansk and Chongar there were concentrated, in total, more than a thousand pieces of equipment.
It was...
Within a month of incomplete functioning of the railroad, the limited supply of the
southern grouping of Russian troops began to have a negative impact on the army's equipment.
At that time I stressed that the occupants would only be able to replenish their troops
with equipment within two weeks or more at the expense of the resource accumulated in the Crimea.
In fact, one month of one-strand reverse supply had passed.
Then I stressed that the occupiers will have the opportunity to replenish their
troops with equipment for two weeks or more, thanks to the accumulated resources in Crimea.
At this point, a month has elapsed without sufficient supplies for
the remainder of the railway lines in the southern section.
Now in the units of the occupiers in the South there is a shortage of ammunition and equipment,
which is impossible to solve solely by the resources accumulated in Crimea.
If the occupiers fail to resolve the issue of supplying their group in the South, in the near
future it will be in the same position as it was on the right bank of Kherson - patho-suicidal.
Oh what am I about the right bank in the past tense? But, never mind. It will be in new videos.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.