Original subtitles

[MUSIC PLAYING]

Is it possible that ancient civilizations may have

possessed advanced technologies?

In this episode, we explore that probability.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

So now, we've established that the universe creates

through the structure of the vacuum.

That the structure of the vacuum spinning

produces the material world from the very small

of the sub-Planck to the Planck to the protons to the atoms

to the planets, the stars, the galaxies, the super clusters,

the universes.

And that universes are birthing each other

as they emit particles.

And we've established that in this creation structure

of the structure of spacetime, we

end up with planets around stars everywhere.

That stars most likely have planets around them

that form as the result of the fluid dynamic vorticity that's

being generated in the structure of spacetime around them.

And that many of these planets could host life.

And certainly, that that life could

be millions of years ahead of us in their technical development.

Which would mean that they most likely

have discovered how to interact with the structure

of spacetime.

With the structure of the vacuum to open wormhole,

to travel through black holes, to go across the universe,

to emerge on this side of our galaxy and discover our planet.

We briefly looked at the history of man.

And talked about how there is some evidence that there

was contact with advanced civilization in our deep past

in an era that now people are starting to call

the pre-cataclysmic era.

Approximately 10,000 to 12,000 years ago,

before the Great Flood, which most likely corresponds

to the meltdown of the last Ice Age.

This flood that was reported by over 300 different cultures

all around the world talking about the end of an earlier

civilization that was very advanced that was destroyed

by a great cataclysm that involved a rise of the ocean

and the flooding of all of these ancient civilization.

When the ancient people talk about this advanced ancient

civilization, they talk as well of their capacity

to fly in the air.

They talk about their capacity to travel in the solar system

at least, if not in the galaxy.

And to have interaction with beings from the stars--

star beings or sun gods.

This is consistent in a very strong way all

around the world from all these different civilizations, which

supposedly had no contact with each other.

The probability that that would occur if these events were just

fictitious, that all of these civilizations around the world

would have developed the same myths, never mind built

similar buildings, is very low.

Talking about the way they built their buildings,

none of these civilizations claimed

to have built some of these remarkable pyramidal structures

that you find all around the world.

A few decades ago, we only thought

there was a few of these buildings,

these pyramids around the world, most known ones,

the ones in Egypt, the one in Teotihuacan in Mexico.

You know, some of the ziggurats in Iran and in Persia.

Now, we have discovered many, many more pyramids

all around the world.

In some regions, we've discovered thousands

and thousands of them.

We found some in China.

We found some under the water near Japan.

Recently, using LADAR technology that

can see under the foliage in southern Mexico

and in Guatemala, we've found thousands and thousands

of pyramids were present, which would

require that millions and millions of people lived there.

I believe that we are starting to discover

the evidence of this earlier civilization

that the ancient civilization talked about.

When they talked about those buildings,

they didn't show themselves building them.

There is no hieroglyphs, for instance, in Egypt,

on any wall in Egypt, that showed

them building the pyramids.

They all said that the sun gods came from the stars

and built these buildings on our planet.

And taught the humans at the time

how to calculate, how to engineer, how to write,

and so on.

There seems to be a common theme when

we look all around the planet in all of these traditions.

It's very similar.

And it's remarkably consistent.

One of the most obvious similarities

is the engineering that you see in Peru

and some of the engineering you see

in Egypt, some of the engineering you see in Turkey.

There's many different places around the world where

you have these enormous stones that were moved,

that were placed with precision that

exceeds anything we have today.

And when I talk about enormous stones, some of them

are smaller, in excess of 20 ton, 30 ton.

Some of them are much larger in excess of 200, 300 ton.

Sometimes moved across valleys and mountain range.

Certain places in Peru where walls

with blocks that exceed 100 ton to 200 tons

are found that were quarried in mountain

ranges across from where they're found.

So that the rocks would have had to be quarried

at the top of these mountains, brought down into the valley,

and up another mountain to be placed where they are.

And some of the stones, for instance,

at the Valley Temple in Egypt, are 200 tons blocks

that come from fairly far away that

are lined with 100 ton granite blocks that comes from hundreds

of miles away.

And the cut of these blocks is remarkable.

Some of the blocks actually exceeds 1,000 tons.

1,000 ton block are extremely difficult to move.

And yet, they've been moved across very large distances,

hundreds of miles across rivers.

And in the case of some of the stones that

are found in Egypt, for instance, at the Ramesseum

Temple, where a statue that was thought

to be a statue of Ramses II is found,

that weighs in excess of 1,000 ton.

And that comes from long distance from where it's found.

And some of the monuments we see around the world

may be from a much formidable age

than what they are thought to be today.

And actually, the archaeologists dated them

with the later people that found them.

And that used them in their culture

because they thought they were the monuments of the gods.

And that they built a whole religion around it.

But these monuments may pre-date this culture by a long shot.

In fact, they may come from pre-cataclysmic flood.

And so they may exceed 10,000 to 12,000 years.

And in some case, be as old as 30,000 to 40,000 years.

Some of the geological evidence on these building

supports these claims.

Why is this important?

It's important because that means the history of humanity

is vastly different than what we think it is.

In fact, there is evidence that the human genome may not

be the result of linear evolution

from monkeys to eventually Homo sapiens.

There is all of a sudden, a huge spike,

which is thought to be missing link

in the evolution of, for instance,

the cranial cavity of the Homo sapiens from the Neanderthal.

These changes that occurred don't

seem to be part of a natural evolution.

All of a sudden the cranial cavity doubling in size.

The brain doubling in size.

The eyes are getting bigger.

The loss of hair.

All this stuff doesn't seem to be in the natural evolution

of human beings, the result of natural transformation

as a result of adaptation to the environment.

But actually, that there was an intervention

that changed the genes of the structure

of the evolution of our planet.

And all of a sudden, produced a being

that was much more advanced.

That might have been the result of the splicing of genes that

made this sudden transformation of the evolution of hominids

all of a sudden producing the Homo sapien.

Which may have taken much, much longer

without this intervention.

And I completely off track?

Am I the only one thinking this?

Is it completely crazy ideas that extraterrestrials

may have come to our planet and altered

or even see that life on our planet?

Francis Crick, one of the most venerated geneticists

on our planet, the man that received the Nobel

Prize for discovering the structure of DNA,

wrote papers in 1973 talking about this.

Panspermia theory suggests that life on Earth

did not originate on our planet, but was transported

here from somewhere else in the universe,

perhaps spanning galaxies and solar systems.

Microorganisms that were unintentionally

distributed by space dust, meteorites, asteroids,

and comets landed on Earth and started life here.

Crick thought that this theory was improbable.

But he wrote that it had to have been implanted

by advanced civilization that came to the Earth

and then planted the genes that produce life on Earth.

Or at least, some of the genome structure on our planet

was altered to produce the evolution we see today.

Others, like William Brown, one of our biophysicists

and molecular biologists at the Resonance Science Foundation,

was able to identify the specific alteration

of the gene that happened that produced

the doubling of the cranial cavity of the Homo sapiens

from the earlier hominids.

When he discovered this, it looked highly suspicious.

It looks like an alteration of the gene that

is typical of what we do today when we alter genes

in GEMAL type of engineering.

And so it may be that not only this advanced ancient

civilization may have been on our planet

prior to our written history, but that this earlier

prior civilization was the source

of the eventual evolution of Homo sapiens on our planet.

A few years ago, I was fortunate enough

to be able to do an autopsy on some remains of mummies

they are found in the Paracas region, where

I was able to test some of the tissues

that I was able to sample from these remains.

For the first time, we were able to get

from these remains not only mitochondrial DNA,

but as well, the nuclear DNA.

Because the material was very malleable still.

And I had retained a very high level of coherency.

And so nuclear DNA was able to be extracted,

although the samples were approximately 2,300 years old,

according to the carbon dating we did.

The mitochondrial DNA, the DNA of the mother

showed some alteration and dilatation of the DNA genome

that placed strangely the origin of the race of the mother,

not in the Paracas region, but in the Black Sea region.

And so the Haplogroup of that genome source

was not localized in South America.

In that region of the Black Sea, is found,

as well, elongated skulls that resemble very much the Paracas

skulls.

So that's interesting unto itself.

But when we analyzed the nuclear DNA, or the father's side DNA,

has a very low percentage match to the human genome.

So far, we haven't finished the analysis.

And we should get it done as well by third party.

And so I cannot certify these results.

But so far, preliminary results show

that the percentage match to the human genome

is in the ratio of 3% to 5%, which is extremely low.

For instance, a banana has a match

to the human genome of almost 40%.

So 3% to 5% match is nowhere close to a Homo sapien.

So this means that they might be,

if this is correct, if the analysis was done correctly,

this might be something that was a branch of hybrids that

had human contact and maybe extraterrestrial contact

as father and mother.

And that this branch of hybrid survived all the way

into almost first century AD.

And we can attribute some of the buildings

and some of the traditions that we

have all around the world about contact

with these higher extraterrestrial being

or with hybrids, which is, as well, in these tradition.

They were called semi gods.

They were the sons and daughters of the intermix between the sun

gods and the humans.

This is described in many of these tradition.

It's even described in the Bible where the sons of gods

come to the Earth.

They find the women of men beautiful

and have children with them and so on.

So is this a possibility?

As a scientist, you have to look at the data objectively.

The data around the world is overwhelming.

The consistency across all these civilizations, traditions,

and morses describing this is remarkable.

The building consistency and techniques is remarkable.

The advanced technology required to move

such large masses for long distances

and their capacity to assemble them

in buildings with the level of precision

that exceeds what we have today is remarkable.

The evidence is overwhelming.

It's really important to be skeptical.

Skepticism, however, is different

than close-mindedness.

One must analyze the data and come

to the appropriate conclusions.

And in this case, the data is telling

a story vastly different than the story we've

been told about the history of humanity

and the development of the human genome.

Why were these people building pyramids?

Why this shape ?

How come we find this all around the world?

It's hard to say.

But definitely, the pyramidal structure, the pyramidal shape

have the capacity to concentrate electromagnetism

at their vertices, at their apex.

That has been measured now clearly.

And as well, we have a relationship

to the resonance cavity of spacetime,

which, as I've described in our equation,

is tetrahedral in nature.

Edge to edge tetrahedral relationship

produce octahedron cavities.

Octahedron cavities are pyramidal shape structure.

So it may not be a coincidence that these very specific shapes

are found all around the world, from all

these different traditions if the source of the knowledge

was coming from the same source, which

was the sun gods that were traveling the world educating

the humans.

Are these building technologies?

I believe they're part of a technology.

I believe that they are missing the heart of the technology.

They're missing the power source at the center.

When we look at complexes, like Giza, or when

we look at Saqqara, or other complexes, such as Teotihuacan,

or complexes like you find at Chichen Itza,

and so on, you see that there is some plan that

went on there in the way they arranged the buildings.

And the way they arranged the resonance cavities at Saqqara,

for instance, with these large diorite boxes that

are found under the ground that would

be like resonance cavities.

And when you look at this as a map from above,

they almost look like electronic circuits

that you think might have been the development of a very

advanced civilization city kind of structure in which energy

was transmitted throughout the city in a different way

than we transmit energy today with cables and poles and so

on.

Where the energy is transmitted through resonance

cavities across the land.

And through water structures, as well,

that are found all in these regions,

where water was flowing through pyramids and so on.

All kinds of direct relationship and analogy

including the orientation of some of these buildings

on the planet.

You would have to have a global knowledge

of the structure of our planet to be able to place.

So all this tells us that, yes, these

could have been the remains of advanced technology,

but that we're missing the power source that

used to be in them to light up all this technology

around the world.

Where did it all go?

If they were all here.

Was a simple cataclysm, like the end of the last Ice Age

be enough to wipe out evidence of such

an advanced civilization?

I believe so, absolutely.

The rise of the waters during the last Ice Age

was in meters and meters covering the land.

There was most likely impact of a large meteorite

that produced the meltdown of the last Ice Age.

And the destruction of a civilization even parts

of continent is very plausible.

So we are discovering the evidence

of that earlier civilization.

It's not like it's not present.

It's there.

There's thousands and thousands of pieces of evidence

all around the world.

It's just that they haven't been put together

because of our fragmentation of science,

because of our tendency to say, oh no, this is this tradition.

And it's got nothing to do with this tradition.

And they had no contact with each other, all this.

We have maybe misinterpreted much of day evidence

that we had discovered earlier, but there's more and more

evidence emerging everywhere on the world right now.

From the galactic perspective, it's

easy to see our world as unified.

It's easy to think of all the humans as brothers

and sisters of one planet.

From a limited perspective of an individual

on one piece of the continent delimited by artificial lines

that we have called countries, and the cultural differences

that we see between these countries,

it's difficult to see the unity in our endeavor.

Although, this is becoming easier

with the instance of internet than the exchange

of information.

And people traveling across the world.

And realizing that a family in Africa

has the same aspiration and the same love for their children

than a family in Canada or a family in the US.

We are just starting to realize the unity in our endeavor.

And discovering a larger community

that could involve a whole galactic structure

would help us unify our human endeavor.

Unify our differences.

And realize that we are all one culture that's

part of a larger cultural structure that we could

call our galactic community.

Which is most likely part of a larger culture that

could be the cluster, the local cluster, or the super cluster,

even the universe.

And so what's important to remember from this episode

is that not only are we not alone in the universe,

but there is a lot of evidence on our planet

that our planet was visited early on in our history.

That it even developed very advanced culture

and civilization on our planet.

The remains of which are present all around the world.

And that we're discovering these remains.

And it's not just one thing, like the pyramids of Egypt,

or the pyramids at Teotihuacan, but that we're

discovering thousands and thousands

of these different structures all around the world.

Stones that were too large for us to move even at this time

and so on.

That gives very strong evidence that there

was contact with advanced civilization

long before our written history in this last 5,000 years.

And that the rediscovery of this knowledge

can lead humanity to a whole new way of interacting

with itself and with the rest of the galactic community.

[MUSIC PLAYING]