Original subtitles

[MUSIC PLAYING]

How was our universe born?

Was it because of the Big Bang?

In this episode, we explore the question of cosmogenesis.

Earlier, we described spacetime as full of energy.

And we saw that this energy is at the source of creation.

We saw that the equations we developed

showed that the proton is basically

a vortex of this energy of space, the vacuum fluctuation,

and that all the particles and all the scales

are as well vortices of this vacuum structure.

One of the equations that we wrote that was very insightful

was the equation that gived us the correct answer

for the vacuum density at the cosmological level.

We briefly discussed earlier that there

is such a thing in physics that is called the vacuum

catastrophe.

Astrophysicists, when they observe the universe,

they see that the universe is not just

expanding but it's accelerating when it expands.

In order to account for that acceleration,

they have to consider the quantum vacuum fluctuation

at that scale.

They call it dark energy.

When they put the vacuum fluctuation, the dark energy

in, they can calculate the density

of how much vacuum energy is present to produce

the expansion.

And they find the density of 10 to the minus 30 grams

per centimeter cubed.

So it's almost 122 orders of magnitude difference

between the Planck vacuum density

and the cosmological vacuum.

We wrote a paper resolving the vacuum catastrophe last year.

In that paper, we show that if we take a proton

and we expand it to the size of the universe,

we find the correct vacuum density for the universal size.

So to be clear, there is a vacuum fluctuation

in the proton.

The proton is a little ball of Planck oscillators,

billions of them, 10 to the 60th.

So it's a significantly large number.

They're spinning together.

And they have the density of what

is thought to be the Planck density,

or a very high density, 10 to the 93

grams per centimeter cube, which is the Planck

density at the quantum scale.

This produced a lot of debate in the physics community

for decades.

It's thought to be one of the biggest

errors in physics, this discrepancy of 122

orders of magnitude.

It created a lot of debate and as well a certain amount

of lack of confidence of the understanding of physics,

whether it's at the cosmological level or at the quantum level.

The vacuum catastrophe is one of the largest problem in physics.

Quantum physicists say it has to be very dense.

And cosmologists say it has to be very low density.

So this is very powerful.

But what does it mean about our universe?

What does it mean about the birth of our universe?

Why are protons in our universe not

expanding to the size of the universe right now?

Why did one proton all of a sudden

expand to the size of the universe?

And that proton might have started

as a Planck expanding to a proton expanding to a universe.

The Big Bang Theory actually starts with a Planck size

singularity expanding to the size of the universe

extremely rapidly.

It's called inflation where the universe in the first Planck

second expands to almost the size it is today.

So it expands at billions, trillions of times

faster than the speed of light.

Is that the right picture?

It's not clear that it is correct.

There is many discrepancies in the standard model.

And one of them being that the source of energy

for the expansion of the universe, the source of energy

for that Planck to all of a sudden explode

into all of time and space and all

of the matter in the universe, has not been described.

There's no mechanism that explains

how the Planck-sized object all of a sudden

just exploded into a universe.

And there is no explanation where the energy

came from for this to happen.

With the model that we've developed now,

which gives the correct answers for the mass

and for the acceleration and so on, we get a different picture.

From the equations we wrote and what we discussed before,

we know that the universe is scaling from the Planck

scale or even the sub-Planck scale to the atomic scale

and so on-- planets, stars, galaxies, clusters,

super clusters, and universes, all this

giving the correct answer.

When we think of this then, we can

think that our universe then is an object very

akin to a black hole.

And we can show that in the equations,

because when we get the temperature,

we get the temperature which is equivalent to the Hawking

radiation of a black hole.

So we know our universe is a black hole.

It has a correct mass and radius exactly to be a black hole.

If that's true, and we see that there

an exchange between the interior of a black hole

and the exterior of the black hole, which

is what we are finding in our equation,

that black holes are not isolated,

that there is information falling in

and then there's information expanding out

of black holes because of their angular momentum,

then we could think that our universe is not singular

but that our universe is part of many other universes

in a larger one, because the scaling tells us this.

It tells us that our universe is part of many universes

that are--

think of bubbles together in a larger universe,

an extremely large universe, which

could be a bubble that's together

with other bubble of that size in the larger universe

just like galaxies are inside our universe.

Well, all this tells us something profound.

That is that our universe might be

the result of a proton or a singularity, a Planck

singularity, that escaped another universe,

another bubble.

To restate what Hawking radiation,

is Hawking radiation says that vacuum fluctuations near

the event horizon can produce a pair of particles in which one

particle is radiated out of the black hole and one particle

falls into the black hole.

So imagine a particle at the surface of the event horizon

of a universal black hole of about our size that radiates

a particle out.

When that particle arrives in the larger universe,

the vacuum density of the larger universe

is many, many orders of magnitude

lower than the Planck density that that particle is made of.

The result is that that particle would

expand very rapidly to make a proton,

eventually to make a universe.

And as it expands, it would as well

exchange information and change particle due to Hawking

radiation and change its dynamics inside.

You can imagine the expansion of such a bubble very,

very rapidly producing vorticular dynamics,

change in density in the system, and vorticular dynamics

that eventually would make quasars, galaxies, clusters,

super clusters, stars, planets, and eventually us.

This is a completely different view of creation.

You can imagine the surface of bubble universes

radiating these particles and these particles

popping into or expanding into new universes like foaming

new universes into existence.

This vacuum fluctuation has even been called

quantum foam for a long time.

The foaming of creation resemble much more a biological dynamic.

Cosmogenesis then is the result of changes in density

when the particle escapes a universe.

But don't just think of this being localized to the bubble

universes of our size.

That would mean that other universes, very large ones,

that are part of the multiverse, so the universe,

for instance, in which we are, which

could be a universe that has a density in which our universe

is equivalent to a proton for that universe.

You can imagine that universe birthing another universe

of its own size as well.

It would mean as well that our universe will eventually

stabilize at a certain radius when equilibrium will

be achieved between the inside of our universe

and the outside of our universe so that there

is a state of equilibrium at the event

horizon of the black hole.

So that means that our universe at one point

would reach a point of equilibrium

with the larger universe it's in.

And what we would see is a slowing down

or stopping of the expansion.

Now I want to talk a little bit about expansion

and acceleration in our universe.

It may be that the dynamics of expansion of our universe

have been simplified a little too much.

They can be more complex dynamics

in our universe than what we previously thought.

That is when the universe expanded,

the dynamics of the fluid structure

of spacetime in our universe would

produce vorticity locally but as well globally, collectively,

for all of the universe.

So the universe would have a structure.

It wouldn't be completely amorphous.

It would have a structure.

It would have polarity.

And it would have a double tourist type of structure

a little bit like galaxy.

Think of a galaxy the size of our universe with its jet

and with its disk.

We've started to see some of those structures

in the universe.

We've we found places where it's much denser and super clusters.

It's like a wall.

We found places where we call it the dark flow where

there's very little.

You know, that would be--

think of the arms of the galaxy at the universal level.

There would be region with more material, region

with less material.

And there would be a definite flow like in galaxies

where star goes from the center out to the edge into the halo

of the galaxy up at the poles and then come back down

in this toroidal dynamic with the jets in the middle.

And there would be polarity to our universe in such a way

that we might find that there's matter that's

spinning in one direction and matter that's spinning

in the other direction.

And that is what we found.

We found that matter can spin in the opposite direction

of the ordinary matter that we see.

And we call that antimatter.

And this was a consequence of the Dirac equations discovering

the electron antimatter particle or the positron.

So this dynamic would, in the universe,

would move things in certain ways

in which an observer, a teeny weeny little observer

like us might think that the universe radius is expanding,

which could be the case, which most likely is the case.

But this could be combined with the movement

of the material inside the universe, which

would appear to us as material accelerating away.

And so there is a more complex view of the motion of stars

relative to each other but as well

of galaxies relative to each other and structures

relative to each other.

We're finding, for instance, that

quasars in our universe and certain region all align very

precisely to one very specific direction.

Quasars have these massive jets that

come out of it like these huge vortices which

are evidence of this fluid dynamics spinning structure

of spacetime.

But these huge jets can be a million light years long.

And they all seem to align in this very specific region

of our universe.

Well, that might be because they're

close to the polar vortices of our universe itself.

And so they tend to, if they're not aligned,

they would tend to slowly align to that pole

as they approach the polarity of our universe.

So there's things like that are puzzling the current physics

community that start to be understood better

with this new model of physics.

Just recently-- this has been an ongoing investigation since

the '90s as I can remember it--

we have noticed as well that light polarization moving

through our universe is by birefringent or acts

like it's moving through a crystal.

There is lots of evidence of it in many ways.

Think of like the structure of spacetime aligning

to a universal frame of reference,

a universal polarized field.

And this leads to belief that this vacuum structure is not

only organized by spin but that spin as well produce

polarization.

So this is called quantum vacuum polarization.

And from this polarity our equations

tells us that these magnetic and electromagnetic field emerges.

It's a completely different view of our universe.

It's a view where the universe is not

some random bubble that's just producing random effects,

but it's highly organized.

It's polarized.

It's not just one universe.

It's part of many, many universe that are being created.

And it's inside a larger universe and a larger universe.

When you tell a child about the Big Bang Theory,

and you say it all started with a big explosion, typically,

the first thing a child will think of or ask

will be what was there before the explosion.

Clearly, this new view tells us that the universe

is fractal in nature.

And it's fractal in scales.

And there's an infinite amount of scales

producing an infinite amount of creative path

that we call universe.

And this evolution is very specific to the coordinates

in spacetime in which it's happening.

So you can think of it as very individualized

but part of the oneness of the infinite nature

of the fractal structure of spacetime.

Initially, Georges Lemaitre, a Belgium cosmologist

and Catholic priest, argued that the physical universe was

originally a single particle, the primeval atom as he called

it, which disintegrated in an explosion giving rise to space

and time and the expansion of the universe that continues

to this day.

The idea marked the birth of what we now

know as big bang cosmology.

Later on, cosmologists realized that an atom was not

a good start, that it would more likely be a Planck-sized object

that expanded to eventually produce

all the time and space and all the matter

we see in the universe.

However, none of these scenarios gives us a clear

understanding of why and atom would all of a sudden,

or a Planck-size object all of a sudden would expand to the size

of a universe.

What is the energy?

Where did the energy come from for that to have happened?

What is the mechanics that made it happen and so on.

Our equation shows something similar but different.

It gets rid of this idea of an explosion, this idea of a bang.

It actually shows that it's basically scalar relationship

of radiation of black hole.

So imagine our universe as a black hole.

And it has Hawking radiation.

So the vacuum fluctuation, the Plank vacuum fluctuation

near the event horizon produced particles.

And these particles, one of them can radiate and one of them

can fall in.

When a particle radiates into the larger universe, the larger

black hole that our black hole universe is in,

the density of that larger black hole

is much, much, much smaller, orders and orders of magnitude

smaller density than our universe.

So when it escapes the black hole universe

that we're in into the larger black hole,

the density change will make it expand very, very rapidly.

And this mechanism is what we believe

is actually the source of the expansion of the universe

or what we have typically called the Big Bang.

Ancient civilizations had very similar thoughts

about the universe.

They thought about the universe as having

information that could be contained

in every atom in the universe.

Many different civilizations around the world

had this in their folklore in their traditions.

They thought of the universe as being just one universe

part of many others.

They talked about our universe as continuously expanding,

or changing, or evolving.

And when they talked about where they got this knowledge,

they said they got it from sun gods from being from the stars,

from the gods that instructed them

on the structure of the universe, and how it works,

and so on.

It's really interesting that at this time in history,

we seem to be finding very similar concepts emerging

in advanced physics, the concept of a holographic universe

where every point contains all the information and so on,

the concept of scaling universe, fractal structures

in the universe and multiverses.

All this seemed to be known by many ancient civilizations

around the world thousands of years prior to modern physics.

Were they instructed by advanced being that they had contact

with at the time?

I don't know.

But definitely there is an analog

between what we are finding today

and what ancient civilization knew

from whether it was direct contact with advanced knowledge

or from their spiritual exploration, which

may have led them to understand the universe by the study

of their own beings since if the universe is a holographic,

each point contains the whole, all information

should be available to every being in the universe.

Remember in earlier episode when we

talked about the entanglement of particles

where two particles leaving one atom will be entangled

and how particles are most likely all entangled

because they all came from the same source, which I just

described being a proton or a Planck

leaving another universe.

So everything is entangled.

Well, that means that as well all of these universes

are entangled because they all emerged from one another.

So all the scales are entangled.

All the universes are entangled.

However, they are developing independently from each other.

And the information is moving through the whole system

in a very complex way.

So you could think that the entanglement

of the universe is out there that our universe has created

would have some of the information about you

and I and everything we see here that I

could go to another universe.

And if I got the right source, I could

learn about what's going on here and that they may be something

very similar to what's going on here that's happening over

there but a little bit different,

because it's getting a little bit

different set of information because it's

in different coordinates of spacetime.

In an infinite fractal universe, it's

important to understand that every point is the center.

So you could say I'm the center of the universe.

However, there would be a larger universe that our universe is

in, and a larger universe that our universe is in, and so on.

At one point, I could find a universe

that I'm in the center of.

And it's important to remember that every other point is

the center of their own universe as well.

Otherwise you'd get in trouble.

But clearly, individualization and the oneness

of infinite fractal universe occurs

because each point observed the universe

from its own perspective and gathers

different sets of information, and so

is there an exact copy of me in a parallel universe?

I would say no.

But they may be a information set

very similar or in resonance with my information set

in another universe due to the entanglement relationship

of all the universes together.