Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
0
00:00:00,450 --> 00:00:03,570
Well, I hope you have enjoyed going
through these mixes with me.
1
00:00:03,580 --> 00:00:09,610
It's been a blast doing this course, it's
taught me a lot about mixing to go back
2
00:00:09,620 --> 00:00:15,600
through this process and if I was able to
mix these tracks and get reasonably
3
00:00:15,610 --> 00:00:20,540
professional sounds using nothing but
stock plugins, in many cases using
4
00:00:20,550 --> 00:00:25,200
plugins I've never used or even seen
before, and doing them very quickly in a
5
00:00:25,210 --> 00:00:30,610
matter of hours, not days, not weeks, not
going back and forth.
6
00:00:30,620 --> 00:00:35,680
Of these mixes again over the course of a
year, getting to a really solid place,
7
00:00:35,690 --> 00:00:41,000
fast tools I've never used, and
potentially hamstringing myself with
8
00:00:41,010 --> 00:00:45,320
tools that aren't my favorites and aren't
the best ones out there and aren't
9
00:00:45,330 --> 00:00:46,900
familiar to me and all that stuff.
10
00:00:46,910 --> 00:00:48,940
But we can still get these things to a
11
00:00:48,950 --> 00:00:51,440
good place.
That's only going to happen because you
12
00:00:51,450 --> 00:00:56,770
have a process and you have principles
that are going to work no matter what
13
00:00:56,860 --> 00:00:58,230
tools you are using.
14
00:00:58,850 --> 00:01:02,180
So the most important tools are in here.
15
00:01:02,190 --> 00:01:04,640
I'd say that they're the ears, but
they're not even the ears.
16
00:01:04,650 --> 00:01:08,870
Because the truth is, a lot of your
favorite mixers, people have made some of
17
00:01:08,880 --> 00:01:10,150
the records you love.
18
00:01:10,170 --> 00:01:12,460
The sound of the most, can't hear as well
19
00:01:12,470 --> 00:01:13,160
as you.
20
00:01:13,170 --> 00:01:14,740
Some of them are in their fifties and
21
00:01:14,750 --> 00:01:19,640
sixties and even seventies and do great
work, and there's a good chance that
22
00:01:19,650 --> 00:01:20,930
you're younger than that.
23
00:01:21,730 --> 00:01:23,700
The Dirty little secret is that hearing
24
00:01:23,710 --> 00:01:26,660
gets worse as you age, and a lot of
people in their fifties and sixties and
25
00:01:26,670 --> 00:01:30,960
seventies can't really hear high
frequencies the way that maybe you can if
26
00:01:30,970 --> 00:01:33,650
you're a couple decades younger than they
are.
27
00:01:33,690 --> 00:01:39,660
But what they have going on is a mindset
that works for mixing, because mixing
28
00:01:39,670 --> 00:01:41,970
isn't about hearing, it's about
listening.
29
00:01:42,730 --> 00:01:44,500
It's about decision making.
30
00:01:44,510 --> 00:01:45,710
It's also about strategizing.
31
00:01:47,110 --> 00:01:50,470
And I think that this is the big thing in
the mixing breakthroughs course is giving
32
00:01:50,480 --> 00:01:53,890
you a strategy, an approach, a road map
for mixing.
33
00:01:54,540 --> 00:02:00,550
You could very well not even like my
mixes for this course and still come away
34
00:02:00,770 --> 00:02:04,110
with some tremendous benefits from this
course.
35
00:02:05,080 --> 00:02:10,410
Because it's about giving you a framework
that I've seen not only work for me in
36
00:02:10,419 --> 00:02:14,670
getting me to better results than I'd
otherwise be able to get, and much more
37
00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:18,010
quickly and with more confidence and with
less second guessing, but I've seen it
38
00:02:18,020 --> 00:02:19,520
work for so many others.
39
00:02:20,350 --> 00:02:22,190
When you use the techniques in this
40
00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:27,310
course, you're using techniques,
strategies, and approaches that I have
41
00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:34,000
called from watching the best mixers work
for more than the past decade I've spent
42
00:02:34,020 --> 00:02:37,420
interviewing. Producing content master classes with
43
00:02:37,430 --> 00:02:41,440
studying the work of opening their
sessions, working alongside, asking every
44
00:02:41,450 --> 00:02:42,440
which way a question.
45
00:02:42,450 --> 00:02:43,940
I can, you know, interviewing Michael
46
00:02:43,950 --> 00:02:48,480
Brauer five times we looked at one of his
mixes like I know this guy's approach.
47
00:02:48,490 --> 00:02:52,640
I've studied the way that he does things,
and not just him, because there are
48
00:02:52,650 --> 00:02:55,990
certain things that he does that are
slightly different than what I might
49
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:57,200
recommend to the average person.
50
00:02:57,210 --> 00:03:00,350
But also Mikuszewski and John Congleton
51
00:03:00,450 --> 00:03:03,900
and Joel Hamilton and all these and Joe
Chiccarelli these people have interviewed
52
00:03:03,910 --> 00:03:05,050
and studied to get.
53
00:03:05,060 --> 00:03:07,360
Their sense for how they go about it,
54
00:03:07,370 --> 00:03:11,280
because I always ask people about their
process whenever I interview them.
55
00:03:11,290 --> 00:03:13,920
What's your approach?
What are the things you do first?
56
00:03:13,940 --> 00:03:17,130
What order do you do things in?
Do you start with everything up?
57
00:03:17,140 --> 00:03:19,470
Do you start with some elements up?
Do you start this way?
58
00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:23,020
Do you start that way?
And I've really tried to base this course
59
00:03:23,030 --> 00:03:26,200
around the common threads that I found in
their answers.
60
00:03:26,570 --> 00:03:30,570
Do every single one of the great mixers
do exactly the step by step process I've
61
00:03:30,580 --> 00:03:35,060
discussed in mixing breakthroughs?
No, and not even I do, and I don't expect
62
00:03:35,070 --> 00:03:35,550
you to do.
63
00:03:35,560 --> 00:03:38,050
Exactly the road map I've plotted out,
64
00:03:38,090 --> 00:03:42,330
but it is an order of operations that
some people do.
65
00:03:42,670 --> 00:03:47,560
And that has so many similarities with
the way so many different mixers do
66
00:03:47,570 --> 00:03:50,710
things. And the biggest thing I found is that
67
00:03:50,730 --> 00:03:55,350
people who have taken this course, actual
students who've tried this process, have
68
00:03:55,360 --> 00:03:59,210
told me how much better their mixes have
gotten, how much more comfortable and
69
00:03:59,220 --> 00:04:03,330
confident and fast they've felt by
applying these techniques.
70
00:04:03,610 --> 00:04:08,180
Not only has that happened, but some of
them have become my mastering clients and
71
00:04:08,190 --> 00:04:11,910
sent me tracks to work on and asked me
for feedback on their mixes.
72
00:04:11,980 --> 00:04:12,740
And I've been.
73
00:04:12,750 --> 00:04:13,990
Blown away by some of these.
74
00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:19,690
One particular guy, a guy named Guy,
actually sent me a bunch of tracks just
75
00:04:19,700 --> 00:04:24,120
recently where he sent me his original
mix he did before watching mixing
76
00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:28,840
breakthroughs, and his revised mix he did
after watching mixing breakthroughs.
77
00:04:28,940 --> 00:04:33,400
And man, the difference in before and
after was astounding.
78
00:04:34,300 --> 00:04:37,290
I mean, the relationships were better,
the mood of the track was better, the
79
00:04:37,300 --> 00:04:39,870
feel of the track was better, the sound
of the track was better.
80
00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:41,360
And it's not just him.
81
00:04:41,370 --> 00:04:42,930
There are so many.
82
00:04:42,940 --> 00:04:45,440
Folks out there, I believe Richie has
taken the course.
83
00:04:45,450 --> 00:04:46,510
He was a big fan of it.
84
00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:48,300
I've mastered some of his records and
85
00:04:48,310 --> 00:04:50,330
just tremendous results.
86
00:04:50,430 --> 00:04:53,280
Like I couldn't improve on his mixes and
87
00:04:53,290 --> 00:04:58,200
I'm having so many students over the
course follow up and send me their mixes
88
00:04:58,210 --> 00:04:59,780
and say wow, taking this really.
8143
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.