All language subtitles for 11-10

The inevitable happened: the Crimean bridge
was finally blown up.

The occupant group in Kherson is having serious
supply problems.

Bravo to the special services, partisans,
underground fighters and even traitors from

the FSB of Russia, never mind ĸwho from the
enemy camp helped carry out this undermining!I’d

like to point out that this is an assumption.

But such a successful action, especially after
the undermining of the "Nord Stream" is guaranteed

to cause an attempted response from an outsider
in this war.

In this regard, it is worth clarifying President
Biden's statement that the risk of using nuclear

weapons is as high today as it was during
the Cuban Missile Crisis.

First of all, we must distinguish between
factual and political statements.

The factual is the actual readiness of the
opposing sides to use nuclear weapons.

And it is based on intelligence - technical
(satellites and aviation) and human intelligence.

The political statement is an emotional message
intended to shape public opinion.

And it is based on the personal evaluation
of the speaker.

In fact, the threat of nuclear weapons has
not grown any more recently, as intelligence

does not record any real preparations for
an attack - neither orders to increase alert,

nor removal of warheads from storage.

Turning back to history, I note that during
the Cuban Missile Crisis the nuclear forces

of the USSR and the United States were brought
to the penultimate level of readiness, above

which only the unwinding of control system
gyroscopes and entry of codes for combat use.

There is no such thing today.

And in the political sense, yes, the risk
is very high, because we are dealing with

an elderly dictator obsessed with obsessions.

And the more evident is the prospect of Russia's
defeat in the aggressive war unleashed by

Russia, the more success of the AFU on the
battlefield, the more actively the hand of

the Kremlin leader reaches for the red button.

But the paradox is that if we theoretically
imagine the cessation of resistance to Ukraine,

the risk of using nuclear weapons will not
become less.

Because the Russian Führer is eager to prove
something to the United States.

Even now, all Russian propaganda tells us
that the Ukrainian army has long been defeated

and the war is with NATO forces.

It is a shame to be defeated by a small enemy
like Ukraine, but it is no shame to lose to

the great America and its NATO partners.

Or better yet, to bend Ukraine to peace, but
by negotiating behind its back.

So enemy bridges must fall and the Ukrainian
army must advance.

Only a visible and unconditional defeat in
the war will cause social upheaval in Russia,

followed by its disintegration.

This will allow it to be deprived of nuclear
weapons and thus effectively nullify the risks

of nuclear apocalypse.

To help the channel grow, watch one or more
of the videos offered to you at the end.

Thank you.