All language subtitles for 04 - Craig - Research informs ideation in the real world.en

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese Download
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:04,280 --> 00:00:06,660 Hi, there! My name is Craig, and I'm 2 00:00:06,660 --> 00:00:08,220 a research manager at Google. 3 00:00:08,220 --> 00:00:11,010 In terms of what the day normally looks like, 4 00:00:11,010 --> 00:00:13,290 I will be working closely with design, 5 00:00:13,290 --> 00:00:16,005 thinking about the next iteration of a product. 6 00:00:16,005 --> 00:00:18,420 I'll probably be working with a product manager, trying to 7 00:00:18,420 --> 00:00:19,950 convince them of a certain direction 8 00:00:19,950 --> 00:00:21,165 that we should be taking. 9 00:00:21,165 --> 00:00:23,370 I'll be thinking about the research gap: 10 00:00:23,370 --> 00:00:25,500 What research should we be doing? 11 00:00:25,500 --> 00:00:27,450 Where could we have real benefit 12 00:00:27,450 --> 00:00:29,190 and impact to the business? 13 00:00:29,190 --> 00:00:31,050 There's very particular moments 14 00:00:31,050 --> 00:00:33,900 where research and design really come 15 00:00:33,900 --> 00:00:36,420 together to align on who we're designing 16 00:00:36,420 --> 00:00:39,600 a product for and seeing how that product is then built, 17 00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:41,820 and then seeing it in the hands of our users, 18 00:00:41,820 --> 00:00:44,430 and seeing how that's then evaluated by them. 19 00:00:44,430 --> 00:00:45,890 Normally, upfront, before we 20 00:00:45,890 --> 00:00:48,620 even think about launching a product, 21 00:00:48,620 --> 00:00:49,730 there's a good amount of what we 22 00:00:49,730 --> 00:00:51,290 call formative or strategic 23 00:00:51,290 --> 00:00:52,970 research that goes on that 24 00:00:52,970 --> 00:00:55,345 our design counterparts are utilizing, 25 00:00:55,345 --> 00:00:58,610 to effectively build out those initial concepts that we 26 00:00:58,610 --> 00:01:01,985 will start advocating for around the business. 27 00:01:01,985 --> 00:01:03,980 Once we've gotten approval or once 28 00:01:03,980 --> 00:01:05,930 we're in the process of saying, "Yes, 29 00:01:05,930 --> 00:01:07,100 this is something we really want to 30 00:01:07,100 --> 00:01:08,750 pursue," then we're typically 31 00:01:08,750 --> 00:01:12,010 researching with users, with prototypes. 32 00:01:12,010 --> 00:01:13,700 We are taking insights that we 33 00:01:13,700 --> 00:01:15,350 have got from the research, working with 34 00:01:15,350 --> 00:01:17,210 our design teams, and really 35 00:01:17,210 --> 00:01:19,070 thinking about the actual design itself, 36 00:01:19,070 --> 00:01:21,440 like, Should it look like this? Should it look like that? 37 00:01:21,440 --> 00:01:22,880 Where should we place this? 38 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:25,345 How will the user move from screen to screen? 39 00:01:25,345 --> 00:01:27,000 In those moments, we're testing 40 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:29,010 frequently, we're testing often. 41 00:01:29,010 --> 00:01:30,550 One of the biggest mistakes 42 00:01:30,550 --> 00:01:32,740 I think every researcher learns at 43 00:01:32,740 --> 00:01:34,360 some point in their career is 44 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:36,560 not testing early and frequently enough, 45 00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:38,770 and we all have stories of where we 46 00:01:38,770 --> 00:01:39,880 haven't done that and the 47 00:01:39,880 --> 00:01:41,215 effect that it's had on the product. 48 00:01:41,215 --> 00:01:43,090 Eventually, we'll have something that we can 49 00:01:43,090 --> 00:01:45,085 launch and that's a really exciting moment. 50 00:01:45,085 --> 00:01:46,735 We've gone all the way from an idea, 51 00:01:46,735 --> 00:01:48,200 all the way from ideation, 52 00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:51,265 through to testing something in the hands of our users, 53 00:01:51,265 --> 00:01:53,140 all the way to a proper launch 54 00:01:53,140 --> 00:01:54,560 where it's out in the public. 55 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:56,680 Our job doesn't stop. We're then 56 00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:59,140 really heavily involved in understanding, 57 00:01:59,140 --> 00:02:00,700 has that product landed? 58 00:02:00,700 --> 00:02:04,255 Is it doing the things that we want it to for the user? 59 00:02:04,255 --> 00:02:05,860 How do the users feel about that? 60 00:02:05,860 --> 00:02:07,360 How are they responding to it? 61 00:02:07,360 --> 00:02:09,470 Again, we take that feedback and 62 00:02:09,470 --> 00:02:12,690 we work quickly with our design, product, and eng[ineering] team 63 00:02:12,690 --> 00:02:13,850 to put that feedback into 64 00:02:13,850 --> 00:02:16,070 the product and iterate from that moment on. 65 00:02:16,070 --> 00:02:19,130 Over time, you get these cyclical loops, 66 00:02:19,130 --> 00:02:22,670 you get this product development process using 67 00:02:22,670 --> 00:02:23,960 research and insights to 68 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:26,245 inform the next stage of the product. 69 00:02:26,245 --> 00:02:29,610 And fortunately, I manage a really great team of researchers, 70 00:02:29,610 --> 00:02:30,800 so it's also about giving them 71 00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:33,440 responsibility and giving them ownership of things, 72 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:35,180 so where can I step back and 73 00:02:35,180 --> 00:02:37,830 let them do more and let them shine?5260

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.