Original subtitles

Today our human medicines committee, the CHMP...

recommended a conditional marketing authorization...

for the first COVID-19 vaccine for the EU market.

COVID was not one of many diseases: it was thé disease...

that was effecting everything in our society. -An increase in new cases.

How many people will die if we don't have a solution?

COVID cases are surging at the border

with 135 detained migrants.

My concerns are that the government is not being transparent with us

about what those risks are.

Lies, damn lies and statistics.

In other words: you have lies, very big lies and statistics.

Then you get situations where a child is not allowed to go to daycare.

You're not allowed into a government building.

You are not allowed to go to a concert or library if you haven't been vaccinated.

Isn't this just de facto a vaccination obligation?

You also see more and more that these larger bodies will influence everything.

The press, all your communication is pushed into a certain direction...

and eventually you have a kind of '1984'-zombies with no way out.

As we saw with the Soviet Union...

it takes a very long time before a nation is then able to move forward again.

...an ideology where each worker may bloom...

secure from the pests of having contradictory thoughts.

The unification of thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on Earth.

We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause.

Our enemies shall talk themselves to death...

and we will bury them with their own confusion.

We shall prevail.

Let's first look at the impact COVID-19 probably has.

We don't know yet the final outcome of this pandemic.

There is a lot of uncertainty...

but we know already that it will have a changing effect.

Changing economies, societies.

It can't just be compared...

with the economic crisis that we had to get through ten years ago.

Its effects will be much more similar to that of a world war.

And actually all countries in the world are affected.

When can we go back to our former normal situation?

When will we have some perspective again?

We're all a bit fed up with this. Right?

I am, anyway. We are incredibly fed up.

I just want to be able to go to the pub again, to the theatre...

meet up with friends on a large scale.

How great will it be to have a vaccine soon and see it work well...

but let's be honest: all vaccines are still in the testing phase.

That means we don't have any vaccine that is sure to work...

and we don't know for sure of any vaccine when it will actually be available.

The biggest challenge was the timeline.

Science was driving everything.

Of course there are risks. Where there is mystery...

there's the possibility that there's an unforeseen problem.

I don't think there were any guarantees that this vaccine was going to work.

That's when we started to feel the pressure of billions of people...

millions of businesses and hundreds of governments.

Suddenly we became their biggest hope for a solution.

Everybody started working on vaccines.

Everyone wanted to help. That was very special.

Everybody thought: How can I use my knowledge to fight this virus?

You have to go through a number of steps to make a vaccine.

First there's basic research and discovery.

From that you're going to develop your initial vaccine candidate.

Then you have what we call Phase I clinical trials.

Those are the initial trials where in small numbers of people...

you test your antigens.

Then you go on to Phase II clinical trials. You can put in large numbers of people...

to really define exactly what it is you want to test.

Phase III is different.

Now you try to prove, not only to yourself, but to the world that something works.

Pfizer and Moderna make use of the messenger RNA.

Much has already been said about that...

and they actually carry a little recipe with them, as it were...

of what that virus looks like.

They get a little description in the form of some kind of code.

Imagine a kind of beaded necklace with different colored beads.

The virus takes that inside and your body then sees that recipe...

and it makes antibodies against it.

It develops activities to oppose this. Then comes the immune response.

That's why a vaccination can make you sick.

You often feel a bit feverish. That's actually good news...

because it goes to show that the vaccine is working.

Your immune system goes to work.

Because your cells have that recipe...

they can recognize the outer form of the virus.

So when the virus enters your body, the immune system says:

Hey, hello, you don't belong here. Attack, get rid of it, get out.

Other vaccines work slightly differently.

For example, there is another method that has been used a lot...

where a bit of protein is placed in the vaccine that is very similar to that virus.

So not a recipe, but a piece which is very similar to the virus itself.

If that enters your body, it will start making antibodies.

The beauty of your immune system is that it has a memory...

so it will remember that from now on.

I had Alex Gorsky, the CEO of Johnson and Johnson, on the phone almost weekly.

It was a unique situation where you have companies that would ordinarily be competing

suddenly collaborating, sharing information.

There was this remarkable feeling of responsibility.

I first sent my colleagues from Pfizer a video message.

I want to take a moment

to share my thoughts regarding the global health challenge...

posed by the novel coronavirus.

I told them that I know that there is a lot of uncertainty in the minds of everyone...

but I told them:

As with any challenge we face...

our North Star remains our belief in science.

Normally, when you develop a vaccine, it takes a very long time.

First you do trial I, then trial II and then trial III, consecutively...

because you want to be sure that everything went well.

Then you move on to the next step because otherwise it is too expensive.

Now we were under such time pressure and the pandemic was such a big threat...

that companies said: We are doing everything in parallel, at the same time.

It can always fail and there were companies who did this and failed.

It's a risk to do everything at once...

because you have to spend a lot of money at once.

If we had failed...

the chances that all the others were failing were incredibly high.

Determining vaccine safety and efficacy is not a done deal...

until we have the proof that it works in Phase III.

Ultimately, some time in the not very distant future...

there's going to be an and-the-envelope-please moment...

where you find out if it does work.

I think the moment of truth has arrived.

Normally, when you develop a vaccine, you launch a trial.

You give some people a vaccine...

and no vaccine to others and then you have to wait.

Here we go. -Hello, everbody.

Hi Ben, hi Catherine.

Good news. We made it.

I love you.

The atmosphere in the UK that day...

was not the atmosphere you'd expect when a vaccine is registered.

It is the atmosphere you'd expect when a war is ending.

The Ministry of Health announced today...

that it was notified of two deaths...

that are linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Some 600-700 people died after being vaccinated.

Check out Lareb's website, it's public data.

Hundreds.

If you vaccinate 14 million people...

you'll have hundreds of people who die after vaccination.

And we currently have two, three people a day...

who die from COVID-19.

What is being researched now for the MRNA vaccines...

is the risk of cardiac inflammation.

Especially with young people and men this seems to be happening.

My husband works in the medical field and I have a degree in electrical engineering.

We are pro-vaccine and pro-science...

which is why we agreed to let Mattie and her two older brothers...

volunteer for the trial.

Before Mattie got her final dose of the vaccine...

she was a healthy 12-year-old who got straight As and had lots of friends.

She had a life, she was energetic. She was not like this.

These are all side-effects that only came to light...

after we had administered the vaccines.

It is very difficult to get the exact numbers for that.

So to answer the question: 'How dangerous are the vaccines?'

It's very difficult to get an exact scientific answer.

Because there is no standard system...

in which everyone who gets a vaccine in the Netherlands...

will be followed up for half a year and records are kept...

so it is really hard to get those statistics sorted.

And that's why it's very difficult to say:

What exactly are the risks of vaccination?

Federal Health Officials are investigating the death of a Saginaw teenager...

just days after receiving his second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

A 13-year-old male passed away...

just three day after receiving his second dose of the coronavirus vaccine.

It is unclear who the manufacturer was.

For a 12-year-old the risk assessment is very different.

This is indeed very difficult in the absence of those exact numbers.

We are talking about things that occur at a low frequency...

but the risk is not zero, because it is never zero.

When you are going to administer the vaccine...

to a population group, an age group that hardly gets sick...

does not die...

then the balance between the pros and cons is different.

In the Netherlands we do not vaccinate younger people against the flu.

We don't because young people hardly ever really get sick from the flu.

When it's safe for younger children:

Absolutely. My advice will then be: just get vaccinated.

Whether children in our country will receive the corona vaccine, remains to be seen.

You can get pericarditis, you can get a heart muscle inflammation.

That can make you pretty sick.

And if you read the Health Council's report well...

They do not exclude that children will die.

Because of the vaccine? -Yes. Again, if the group is big enough...

An inflammation of the heart muscle or the pericardium is not without danger.

There are children who die from it.

And if you vaccinate a very large group...

well...

then this could happen.

Let me start with the campaign.

You can report on mijnbijwerkingen.nl if you think:

I probably have a side-effect of this vaccine.

There is a special form available on our website that you can fill in.

If people start reporting that...

we can quickly see what the side-effects are.

Known side-effect, common side-effects...

but also rare side-effects that can appear.

But, and that is very important, we will keep an eye out for the unexpected...

because there is always a chance, however small, that something unexpected happens.

That is why it is important... -Yes, but then the vaccine is in our bodies.

I can imagine people watching this and thinking: Oh my gosh.

There is a lot of communication from different sources.

That leads to confusion and some people are starting to see conspiracies.

That doesn't help either.

So the provision of information could have been better.

I think they did a better job in England.

There they had a press conference every day.

There was a minister with some advisors, answering and collecting questions.

And here the RIVM said something...

then the ministry said something, the Health Council.

So unambiguous information would have saved us from a lot of confusion.

I have been following the development of those vaccines since May last year...

and then you see that the clinical trials conclude that it is safe.

The only thing is that you don't know if there is any side-effect...

that occurs with one in a hundred thousand or one in a million people.

So far only one major one been found.

That's the thrombosis in Janssen and AstraZeneca.

And at the moment another rare side-effect is being studied...

which is a transient inflammation of the heart after the Pfizer vaccine.

This mainly occurs in young adults.

I think it's important to stress...

that young people should do it because they benefit from it...

and they don't want to get corona.

They shouldn't do it with the idea:

Contribute to herd immunity and the disappearance of the virus...

because this virus, or a variant, will somehow always remain among us.

You can't eradicate that with a vaccine.

Vaccines are important interventions but for this they aren't good enough...

to actually make it happen.

The Netherlands is a pinhead on the world map.

It's insignificant. Many people have never even heard of the Netherlands...

and we need to realize that when we talk about...

how to deal with this pandemic on a global scale.

It's actually not important at all what we think in the Netherlands.

It's much more important that we do not think...

that we can do it on our own and act differently from the countries around us...

other than through European cooperation, through European alignment.

I think we need to create a lot more clarity globally.

Right now, communication in the Netherlands...

is a kind of vessel with contradictory messages, singing ministers...

and ministers who claim that you can start partying right after your vaccination...

and things like that. I don't think that's the way to go about this.

Then we should look at:

How can we do this in coordination with ECDC, with the WHO...

in a way that all countries, all governments...

because it's weird that the Dutch government...

chooses a completely different approach from the countries around us.

So you need to coordinate that much better.

Last Tuesday one of his patients died after vaccination with the Moderna vaccine.

A relatively healthy patient.

As a general practitioner I'm not allowed to establish death in these cases.

I have to call the GGD doctor.

I did and he really helped me...

but after an internal consultation, he also said:

Listen, it's a fever after vaccination.

That's a normal side-effect of a vaccination.

It is a registered vaccine.

People more or less take the risk that something like this can happen.

And if you die from it, it is truly a shame...

but it is considered a natural death.

Mr. President, the American, the British, the European authorities...

have looked at the numbers...

and they arrive at 16 incidences of thrombosis...

on 8 million injections in the United States.

That chance is one in a half million.

If you compare that to the risk of dying...

or suffering serious issues from corona...

the Dutch consideration is clear...

and it makes sense that all the authorities follow this advice.

In this crisis, the Danes have...

I am very concerned...

that we give our government certain powers that are meant to be temporary...

because viruses are not temporary. There will always be viruses...

and when something arises...

like in the beginning, in March 2020, we don't even know how deadly it is.

Of course, action must be taken quickly...

but with the way this is going now, I am very concerned...

about how temporary those measures are.

It's already a vaccination leader in Europe...

and now Denmark is one of the first to promise a digital vaccination passport.

For these frontline workers that could mean more freedom.

The more countries that connect to a platform...

where this information can be shared, the more valuable the platform becomes.

But we need to start somewhere.

A system like a corona passport or some electronic system...

is an expensive, complex system...

that is designed for use in the long term.

The same applies to temporary measures. If the coronavirus doesn't go away...

will those temporary measures really be temporary?

Professor Montagnier, the joint recipient of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology...

for the discovery of HIV, took up the torch after Benveniste.

On the WHO curve we see that since the start of vaccinations in January...

the curve indicating new infections has increased enormously.

Even young people die, for example by thrombosis.

How do you regard the mass vaccination program?

The program has started, it works, and is not expensive.

I think it's a big mistake.

It is both a scientific and a medical error, so to speak.

It is an unacceptable error, as history will show one day.

Because of the vaccinations other variants arise.

Against the China virus...

a vaccine that produces antibodies has been made.

And what will the virus do? Is it dying or is it mutating?

The new variants are the result of vaccination.

And you can see in all countries the same thing is happening:

The vaccination curve is followed by the curve of the number of deaths.

There are already variants vaccines are really less effective against.

It's not unthinkable that this leads again...

to people being hospitalized with new corona variants...

because the vaccine doesn't work against it or that vaccines only work temporarily.

Viruses like this are very difficult to eliminate with a vaccine...

because it changes constantly.

With vaccines you're always running a little behind...

because the coronavirus mutates as we get infected by it.

So that basically goes in all directions.

We can't predict how it will mutate.

We could predict, based on data from other countries...

that the Delta variant would become dominant over here...

because we saw that happening in other countries.

But we can't really predict what the next variant will be.

Moving on. The World Health Organization says the world is in danger...

of losing hard-won gains in the fight against COVID-19.

The contagious Delta variant is spreading in more than two thirds of all countries...

with a global vaccination gap aiding the spread. This map shows...

What I'm actually the most afraid of at the moment...

considering all of the variants that we have seen arise...

is that variants may arise that the vaccine really doesn't work against.

And if that happens it may well be...

Starting from scratch may be too strong a word...

but then we will have a huge, new problem.

The World Health Organization is highlighting the urgency of the problem.

Do you really accept 1.5 percent vaccination in Africa...

while in some countries it's already 70 percent?

The world is actually morally, epidemiologically...

and economically doing the wrong things.

Certain supranational organizations like the WHO...

have been given a huge role, suddenly. That's funny, because Trump just said...

that the WHO was not at all that important, and a corrupt organization.

He even stopped the funding.

Then came Covid and then the WHO suddenly was some kind of divine entity...

that taught all kinds of wisdom.

Ten corona vaccine candidates are now in late-stage trials.

The world is celebrating what could be the breakthrough in fighting COVID-19.

Pharmaceutical companies are also cheering.

The public sector has invested billions more in development...

but it is the private sector that will rake in the cash.

Under existing agreements they control the price...

and get the profits.

Pharma firms say that's fair.

Development is expensive and time-consuming...

and results are not guaranteed. It's a gamble for governments, too...

which are reserving millions of doses of a vaccine they hope will work.

Still other coronaviruses could come along. Vaccines could become Big Pharma's...

new cash cow.

What pharma has done very cleverly:

According to their old business model they made medicines only for the sick.

But there are fewer sick people. And now they make something for healthy people.

That group is much larger, so they can earn a lot more money.

That's very smart. And we all fell for it.

The Netherlands has started vaccinating against corona.

Sanna Elkadiri from Eindhoven...

Which I also find very strange is that all those companies...

like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube started to follow in extreme ways...

this WHO narrative.

Stay at home.

Keep calm and hold on. An initiative of the Belgian government.

Communication scientists know that repeating a message over and over...

is the basis of propaganda.

Please stay at home.

We now see that everyone is so scared and so indoctrinated...

by all the state propaganda, and all that fear porn on the national news...

that people are willing to give up a lot of their freedom, their fundamental rights...

for some kind of fiction about a very dangerous virus...

that's lurking around the corner.

It's completely personalized. This is simply ridiculous.

And I hope people will realize at some point that they have been fooled.

I've examined subliminal messages...

that go straight to your brain without you being aware of it.

I am intrigued by the background images that serve as infographics.

You see a patient coughing. She is young and wears a face mask.

The other patient is also young...

unlike the vast majority of the patients who fall ill. They are extras.

The images were purchased from Shutterstock.

The subliminal message is clear:

Even very young people, even you, can become a victim of Covid.

Strangely enough the World Health Organization advises...

not to watch the news too much...

out of fear of causing other health problems.

But for news companies it is a way to attract viewers.

The number of infections in our country keeps rising.

60 deaths in the last 24 hours.

The number of infections is rising.

Today's corona figures... -The numbers are still worrying.

The limit of 1000 deaths has been exceeded.

Death rates are shown for weeks, and compared with those of other countries.

In Brazil the limit of 10,000 corona deaths has been exceeded.

The number of infections in Spain is greater than Chinese figures.

At the end of the first wave Belgium is at the top with 10,000 deaths...

per number of inhabitants.

When the European Union in 2018...

negotiated a code about fake news...

they also proposed obligatory training for citizens...

to be able to properly assess news and information by themselves.

You should at least know that all information that comes your way...

contains a grain of truth somewhere...

but there's always a frame around it, a haze if you like...

of whoever brings that news.

And that's why we need to protect citizens.

July 24. I attend a Sciensano press conference.

That day there are few journalists in the room.

The epidemic is past its peak...

and the audience is tired of the messages about the coronavirus.

Good morning, everyone.

Unfortunately I have a sad announcement to make today.

A 3-year-old child has died of the consequences of a COVID-19 infection.

We hope this sad news will serve as a warning...

A few minutes later the news became disseminated by the media.

The headlines were indiscriminate.

I spoke with the father of this child at his workplace.

When I read in the media that she had died from Covid, I didn't accept it.

My child had Covid, but died of neuromuscular disease.

If all you get served are visions of fear...

and every critical view is taken away...

then of course you get scared. There's something weird going on.

Why have we never had the same fear with another big wave of the flu?

In 2017/2018, some people were also not able to get a hospital bed...

and the ambulances went to other hospitals, too.

Excess mortality was also greater than the years before...

but we never made a big deal out of it.

My colleague Viviane Fischer and I...

started this corona investigative committee in Berlin.

Because we wanted to have answers.

We wanted to get answers to the questions that we think everyone wanted answered...

The government should have answered but they never even made an effort...

to look at the other side of the story.

They only looked at one side of the story. That's the panic mode.

Which was all started by Drusden and Wieler here in this country.

And then through the WHO it was spread to the entire world.

But it all started here, because Drusden is the guy who is responsible.

He's the major puppet they're using in order to spread this panic and fear.

But... So I'm saying that...

The first question we wanted an answer to, was: 'how dangerous is this virus?'.

Because remember: the swine flu turned out to be just a mild flu.

And now in the meantime the WHO and John Ioannidis...

one of the most quoted scientists in the world from Stanford University...

they both agreed that the infection fatality rate...

is between 0.14 and 0.15 percent.

Which is roughly the same as the common flu.

So what... what is this?

Why all these measures which we never had before?

Joe brought it home from the office.

He gave it to Betty and one of his kids.

And to Betty's mother.

But Betty's mother went back to California the next day.

On her way to the airport she gave it to a cab driver...

a ticket agent, and one of the charming stewardesses.

At school Joe's kid gave it to some other kids.

And Mrs Meryl got it, and gave it to her husband.

In California Betty's mother gave it to her best friend Dotti.

But Dotti had a heart condition, and she died.

But before she died Dotti gave it to her girlfriend...

the mailman, the paper boy...

and the vet when she went to pick up her chihuahua.

If a swine flu epidemic comes, this is how it could spread.

You want to be protected, especially if you're elderly or chronically ill.

Get a shot of protection. The swine flu shot.

Look, you used to have freedom and responsibility.

So primarily you had this individual freedom...

and it went very far.

Because the government can't just come by, knock on the door...

and say, "I'm going to vaccinate you."

That was impossible. The individual has enormous freedom.

But that also includes responsibility.

I've always been in favor of a small government that regulates the essentials...

and also takes responsibility for the bottom of the society.

There should always be a safety net, but the freedom of the individual prevails.

But now there has been a huge shift...

where individual freedom has been completely pushed into the background.

And the government now has all the power, which is life-threatening.

Despite the ban protesters still come.

Want a vaccine? You want it? -Yes, please.

Well, here it comes. -Yes.

Oh, delicious. -And now you can hug everyone again.

Now we can cuddle again.

I've already had six. -That's great.

I know, right? -Hello, scaredy-cat.

Did you succeed? -You're back.

Did you manage to frighten someone? -He's not afraid anymore.

Over his bike. Right on top of his bike.

Someone is getting beat up over there.

Get over here.

Yes, get it. Film it. That dog has him pinned down.

Someone is being completely...

Yes, we're off. Let's go.

Get out, get out.

Out of nowhere the whole field is wiped clean.

There are still a lot of people on the ground.

But on this side of the field they went completely berserk.

We should respect the police, and respect the mayors.

We have to respect the Military Police.

In normal situations that's completely normal.

Only we all have seen those videos...

where completely peaceful, middle-aged protesters with a backpack...

who just stand there, are beaten to a pulp.

It makes me wonder, why violence is being used.

Isn't it time for an authority, and you are the right person...

to say: Come on, we're all having issues with the corona measures...

everyone in their own way.

But let's at least treat people, who are at a peaceful demonstration...

in a normal, civilized way.

If the police have to intervene harshly, it is always evaluated after.

That happens every time.

But the default is... The fallback position is always...

I also hope that Mr. Van Haga, otherwise he has drifted quite far...

that basically we always assume that the police...

are doing the right thing, but within that context.

If you're being attacked, it's a different story.

I understand, I'm not drifting at all.

I also stand for 'law and order', but this is just going too far.

We currently have a caretaker government.

Well, have you noticed that they are outgoing?

Not me. Mark Rutte said: 'Yes, it's rather funny.

We have more power than ever. You can't send us away as we're already resigned.'

This could go on indefinitely.

What I'm seeing, again, is the idea that all power should be more centralized.

No longer at a national level, but more at a supranational level.

I see that in everything.

I see it in the lockdowns, which were introduced at the same time.

If Germany does this, we do the same thing two days later.

So it's all aligned. We're all aligned.

There are a few people at a higher level that is partly EU, but also the WHO...

These people have plans.

They say, 'If you do this...' or: 'We propose that. You have to do this.'

Or 'We think this'', 'This is our guideline'.

Then everyone follows suit.

What I'm having trouble with, and that has to do with democracy...

is that not just the Dutch parliament, but also the Germans and Belgians...

That they don't have, to put it bluntly, the balls to take a critical stance.

Cold, hot, or lukewarm.

We are probably here in the context of a lukewarm war.

That means that no weapons are used.

But there is mobilization of the public opinion on the part of the governments...

which is very similar to the mobilizations that take place during a hot war.

In this case, one must of course have unanimity behind the government.

There should be no dissent...

no freedom of the press, no freedom of speech.

It's such an important matter that people must sacrifice everything for this victory.

Whether it's television, radio, or print media...

they all participate in the same campaign.

And one can't afford it to have different opinions.

Some people are always in a hurry.

They run when they could walk...

race up steps, when others take it slow.

When Joe Biden is president America is just going to have to keep up.

We won't have to wait to deal with COVID-19.

He's already got a plan.

CPA is Corporate Political Activity.

That concept is on the rise in America.

There's been much ado about it recently, and I follow it.

It's actually the way in which multinationals influence the government.

The simplest form is lobbying.

But also paying politicians' political campaigns.

Promoting politicians, supporting a personal image...

or strengthening a politician's image by getting advisors involved.

Wall Street Journal reporters offer crucial insights...

into of the origin of the coronavirus pandemic citing previously undisclosed...

US intelligence. The Wall Street Journal report says...

How much of the media content that gets published in the Wall Street Journal...

comes from real journalists, or what percentage comes from companies?

Apparently 50 percent of what was published in the Wall Street Journal in 2004...

is directly derived from multinational sources.

There has been no reporter. They just copied it.

The press releases have been edited a bit...

but it's not based on journalistic investigation.

That's only part of it, as the Wall Street Journal...

is the Financial Times of the USA.

It has a huge influence on business...

and the political choices that are made there.

It becomes such an abstract world...

in which the collective is being manipulated in a certain direction...

by something you can't control anymore, which makes democracy disappear.

Alongside inequality the other major danger we face...

is the rise of digital dictatorships...

that will monitor everyone all the time.

This danger can be stated in the form of a simple equation...

which I think might be the defining equation...

of life in the 21st century.

B x C x D = AHH.

Which means biological knowledge, multiplied by computing power...

multiplied by data...

equals the ability to hack humans. AHH.

If you know enough biology...

and you have enough computing power and data...

you can hack my body, and my brain, and my life.

And you can understand me better than I understand myself.

You can know my personality type, my political views...

my sexual preferences, my mental weaknesses...

My deepest fears and hopes.

You know more about me than I know about myself.

And you do that not just to me, but to everyone.

A system that understands us better than we understand ourselves...

can predict our feelings and decisions...

can manipulate our feelings and decisions...

and can ultimately make decisions for us.

We do know that we are being manipulated.

You mentioned that when you said why we need free press.

Yuval mentioned that when he talked about where we are with algorithms.

And the question is really whether we would... Whether we'll let this continue.

So should we demand that all algorithms that make or influence decisions...

are a matter of public record, or at least subject to some regulator...

who actually can unmask at least, or understand how they're working...

and explain something? -But who is controlling the regulator?

You tell me. You're the politician. -That's the risk.

You tell me, we have to go there. -In the end, maybe... Just briefly.

I believe that in the end you want your people, your country to be the regulator.

Take 1984, we have...

...a global regulator that then lets countries decide how they do that.

In terms of regulating AI to make sure that privacy is protected...

that data is protected, yes I agree. You need regulation there.

And at the moment that is going on to make sure that the European Union...

is the biggest data mine in the whole of... in the whole world.

And everybody would like to mine that data.

So it is crucial that you have regulation in place.

But in the end, the strongest regulation is independent thinking people...

in all classes of society. And that is at the core of our societal system.

But in the end, let's not get too scared about this.

Because if we start to regulate this too heavily...

then it... That will immediately pose the question who's controlling the regulator.

Because that man or woman will have a lot of power.

The developments in biotech have progressed fast in recent years.

And the big data is now added to that.

And big data is going to be very decisive for healthcare in the future.

I think at this point parties like Google, Facebook, and Amazon...

possess the most big data.

They don't collect it for no reason. It will be worth money one day.

It is being said that 'data is the new gold'.

That's why I would like to advocate that we in Europe for medical data...

in the Netherlands, should start to make a good system.

Including protection pertaining to personal data...

with the standards we maintain in Europe, and that we have all agreed upon.

Because they are different than global standards.

We've ended up in a society, thanks to corona, which is much more controlled.

The government has become much more powerful.

They can make us jump if they want to. Now we have those lockdowns, too.

The curfew was of course a dystopian measure.

A year ago no one could have thought we would accept that.

Yet many people have accepted it, while arguably...

a curfew has no effect on the spread of the virus at all.

All hospitality industry venues were closed...

while there were hardly any infections there.

2.9 percent of the infections could be traced back there.

And yet it was closed completely. So there are other underlying motives.

It's not public health that was served here.

We're talking about a certain shift in power.

When we look at COVID, I think we should distinguish within three phases.

We have the three R's.

'Restrain', which means to fight the virus.

The 'hot phase' most countries are in today.

Then we have 'recover', to go back to a kind of new normal.

And finally the 'reset'.

Which means to define and to design the strategies...

which should lead us into the after-corona phase.

There are big plans.

If I'm not mistaken from 2002-3 they started to set that up.

That's a big plan with the aim that in 2030 there will be a lot of things...

We all know that. It was in the papers. ...environmental measures are in place.

Of course if all that would work out...

that will have major economic consequences all over the world.

You can see that the national power is getting less and less prominent...

especially in the financial field...

by central banks, which have gained more and more power. In the US as well as here.

You see concentrations of power on a higher level than we're used to. That's a fact.

Look at the facts, and you see that the middle class is declining. That's a fact.

It's been researched. You can see that power and influence...

of multinationals is increasing. There are studies to prove that. That's a fact.

It's not a conspiracy. But if you put that together you might say it all adds up.

I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but I do believe...

that everything we have now discussed...

will also be addressed at the World Economic Forum.

Our world has changed.

I'm afraid bad things are going to happen...

of which a lot of people will say: "Oh, I didn't expect that at all."

'I did not expect that.'

Some people expected it but they aren't listened to enough.

The fourth industrial revolution is coming with enormous speed...

and we change not only what we are doing, but who we are.

In 1913 only one of ten people lived in the cities.

Now over 50 percent of the world's population lives in cities.

We live in a hyper-connected world, globalization is the word of the day.

What happens in one city really influences another city.

The Rockefeller Foundation has really been actively trying to work with cities...

to address new ideas of urbanization...

to help cities really meet their growing and increasing urban challenges.

Chairman, in 2010 the Rockefeller Foundation developed...

one of the most influential NGOs in the world...

a number of scenarios for the future of technology and international development.

This report.

And in this report the Rockefeller Foundation describes...

the so-called Lock Step scenario...

on the arrival of a global pandemic and its aftermath, already in 2010.

According to this scenario... I have it here with me.

...the Chinese would be the first to start 'mandatory quarantine for citizens'...

I quote, 'and immediate and almost hermetic closure of all borders'.

National leaders around the world would strengthen their authority...

with laws, rules, and restrictions. Of mandatory use of face masks...

to body temperature checks at entrances to train stations, airplanes, buildings.

It's all in here, but it doesn't stop there...

because according to the Lock Step scenario we have a lot to look forward to.

Red means that you concentrate well.

Teachers at this primary school in China... -Blue means you're distracted.

...know exactly when someone isn't paying attention.

White means you are offline.

These headbands measure each student's level of concentration.

The information is then directly sent to the teacher's computer and to the parents.

China has big plans to become a global leader in artificial intelligence.

It has enabled a cashless economy where people make purchases with their faces.

A giant network of surveillance cameras with facial recognition...

helps police monitor citizens.

Meanwhile, some schools offer glimpses...

of what the future of high-tech education in the country might look like.

Well done.

Classrooms have robots that analyze students' health and engagement levels.

Students wear uniforms with chips that track their locations.

There are even surveillance cameras that monitor...

how often students check their phones or yawn during classes.

These gadgets have alarmed Chinese netizens.

The government has poured billions of dollars into the project.

Imagine a warm glowing light between your eyebrows.

The device is made in China and has three electrodes.

Two behind the ears and one on the forehead.

These sensors pick up electrical signals sent by neurons in the brain.

The neural data is then sent in real-time to the teacher's computer.

So while students are solving math problems...

a teacher can quickly find out who is paying attention and who is not.

During this period the student is a bit distracted.

A report is then generated that shows how well the class was paying attention...

and even details each student's concentration level at ten minute intervals.

It's then sent to a chat group for parents.

Here you can see the score of each student.

The reports are detailed.

But whether these devices really work and what they exactly measure isn't as clear.

Today, we are talking about chips that can be implanted.

When will that happen?

Certainly in the next ten years.

At first we will implant them in our clothes.

These are the so-called 'wearables'.

And we can imagine that after that they are implanted in our brains...

or under our skin.

And in the end there may be direct communication...

between our brains and the digital world.

I hope so much that the Rockefeller Foundation will be wrong on that point.

All their predictions have come true.

But I hope that they are really wrong here.

That there comes a point when we wake up.

When we see that this is a collective psychosis.

That locking up the whole land, half the world...

for a year and a half because of a flu variety, is insane.

That we walk around with those silly non-working face masks.

That we keep to those completely nonsensical social distancing rules.

And we have seen our businesses, our social lives go to pieces.

We've been holding back excellent first-line medicine like ivermectin...

just so those experimental injections...

can obtain the status of 'approved vaccine' faster.

People chatter: Oh, the number of infections is decreasing.

While this also happened last year of course, as it happens every year.

Like there will be new infections during autumn, of course.

As it always happens. And we pretend it's because of 'corona'.

While what we used to call the flu, seems to have completely disappeared.

The main thing is, to conclude, that we recognize...

that under the pretext of some hysteria about this Chinese flu

an infrastructure has been set up which at any time...

following any random incident, can be reused.

Lockdowns, face masks, distancing, not traveling anymore...

no more shaking hands, ridiculous experimental injections.

This corona time was an obedience training.

The House of Representatives and the Rutte government have passed with flying colors.

Congratulations. Klaus Schwab can be proud of you.

The globalist plans can be implemented...

and the next step towards mass surveillance and total control can be taken.

Thank you.

You don't have to be a fan of Thierry Baudet or Wybren van Haga or someone like them...

to believe that they are telling the truth.

But I think the media, politics, and parliament have a task...

and I think they don't do enough...

to provide more objective information.

If you have trouble hearing and go to see a doctor...

he will not only examine your ears. He will give you a full medical examination.

If your ears ring, he will not only look in your ears.

There is a broader view.

The government mainly talks to the medical profession to solve a pandemic...

and doesn't look at the economy and all its psychological effects...

on children, adults, students.

Then you are working on the phenomenon which Schwab also describes in his book.

You've read the book?

Yes, a very exciting book.

I have read it. Initially, when I read it...

I have never seen such a good and powerful representation...

of the present state of the world.

He analyzes and he describes what's going on...

and how it all came about in the past 20 years.

The West, the East, the strengthening of China.

He does it with such power and skill...

so I have deep respect for the intellectual abilities of this man.

And how he wrote it.

Thus far, the corona crisis is one of the least deadly diseases and pandemics...

the world has experienced over the past 2000 years.

That's written here in English.

And the consequences of COVID-19 in terms of health and mortality...

are very mild compared to previous pandemics.

What I have established is that so far COVID-19...

has killed less than 0.006 percent of the world's population.'

If you're going to juggle numbers...

If you take the world population and you look how at many people have died...

you're talking about ten thousandths of a percent.

But if you look at the number of infections you have a higher percentage.

This juggling with numbers makes it difficult.

But he says it's the least deadly...

and least contagious disease of the past 2000 years.

What I miss...

He even writes: 'So COVID does not pose an existential threat to the world.'

He says so. So the measures we have seen around the world...

are a bit on the heavy side.

He doesn't pass any personal judgment on that.

He only concludes that it is not the most serious pandemic, without saying...

Because I also expect this from parliamentarians.

I expect from influencers, that they have an opinion about this.

A well-founded opinion.

No conspiracy theories, no juggling with numbers, but just an opinion.

When they say this is the least dangerous pandemic over the past 2000 years...

It's written right here. He could also have said:

'If you look at what has happened economically...

that makes you wonder.'

We don't really notice it but when we start feeling the economic pain later on...

when people start losing their jobs, and the housing market crashes...

everything we had in the previous crisis...

then there will be a public debate again about what we're talking about now.

Not at this moment. People have, as my my colleague says, a pill under their tongue.

They're calmed down, sedated...

because of all those splendid government measures that keep things nice and quiet.

The true effects of these measures are not clear now.

The pill under the tongue, people are sleeping.

They are in a daze. I think that society is in a daze.

They are not awake.

And they will wake up when all these support measures stop.

If you don't get any money and you can't go shopping anymore...

or you can no longer pay your rent, it will be a whole different story.

Now is a historic moment in time.

Not only to fight the virus, but to shape the system.

We have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity...

to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path.

It is an opportunity we've never had before and may never have again.

So we must use all the levers we have at our disposal...

knowing that each and every one of us has a vital role to play.

The Great Reset is a welcome recognition that this tragedy must be a wake-up call.

it is imperative that we reimagine, rebuild...

resign, reinvigorate and rebalance our world.

Rebalancing investments, harnessing science and technology...

and advancing the transition to net zero emissions...

all elements of The Great Reset are fundamental for building the future we need.

The WEF has 3000 sponsors, all 3000 of them are multinationals...

whose CEOs can participate...

in all those debates of the World Economic Forum.

And then you have all those world leaders who go there too.

A lot of things are discussed there which ultimately translate...

It's basically a debate club...

where everything comes together with the people who can make it happen.

This Great Reset is as serious and as dangerous a threat...

to our prosperity, to your prosperity and to your freedom...

as we have faced in decades, with these powerful bodies...

including the World Economic Forum, the United Nations...

the International Monetary Fund and even Prince Charles...

boasting, yes boasting, that within a few short years...

their words, 'You will own nothing and you will be happy.'

Remember, this is not me saying this. This is them.

They are even running ads for The Great Reset.

The environmental plan, also like Schwab put it here, has two sides.

If everyone gets started on this, producing more windmills, solar panels...

That is employment. That makes sense. Well, good.

And of course it is, and that's the downside, the negative side in my opinion...

is limiting options, human rights.

It's understandable but discouraging people from going on holiday by plane...

up to...

no longer lighting a wood stove, which you find cozy in winter.

Because that is bad for the environment, the soot particles that you spew into the air.

A lot of people, including Sigrid Kaag, have argued for years...

for the Sustainable Development Goals, the SDGs.

It contains very good things.

'We are going to try to rid the world of famine.'

Fine. That's not a conspiracy that's just their idea, their ideal.

That's what they should do.

But I have this feeling that corona is being used...

for all kinds of other schemes.

The whole climate issue is now pushed through quickly.

But in that climate story too you should...

look at the climate, as an engineer in a technical way.

At the moment there is hardly any kind of parliamentary democracy.

It's a bit switched off, it's less.

So the government has more power and just pushes this through.

Chairman, democracy in the Netherlands is dead. We're not even ruled...

I think that's a horror scenario. So we just shouldn't do that.

You get an app, everything is added to that.

Whether you ran a red light, whether you went to bed on time.

I know what they add to it. -It becomes a system.

That's ridiculous, of course.

Is it going that way? -We're heading that way now, yes.

When you are the border or a festival and you have to show:

'Look, I'm corona free.'

And especially if you can be tracked.

So they're going to watch where you have been.

Who you have been in contact with. They will call them all.

I know cases of people who had been to a party...

and the people at the party discovered that someone had corona.

They called the GGD. And everyone got a call.

People are no longer allowed to go to school, or to take exams.

What kind of absurdity is this?

Chairman, more and more people are seeing it's a big lie...

that the current corona policy serves to protect our public health.

That, of course, begs the question why we have all those horrible measures...

that affect our whole way of life and are destroying our entire society.

Now there are some influential globalists...

who claim to see the corona crisis as a huge opportunity...

to reset our world and therefore have a perverse interest...

in prolonging this crisis for a while.

And one of these globalists is Mr. Klaus Schwab...

founder and chairman of the World Economic Forum.

He has also written a book with the catchy title:

COVID-19, The Great Reset.

My question to the Prime Minister is:

How does he judge the contents of this book?

The Prime Minister.

I do not know the book, Chairman.

But I'd like to advise Mr. Van Meijeren...

not to believe in all those conspiracy theories.

I watch them also on YouTube.

I find it fascinating how they explain that 9/11 didn't happen, or not as we think.

Very well put together but it usually is what it is: a conspiracy theory.

Mr. Van Meijeren.

I'm surprised that the first question I present to Mr. Rutte...

after being sworn in as an MP... -Congratulations on that, by the way.

Thank you. But it surprises me...

that my first question is immediately answered with a lie.

I have a letter in my hand dating from November 26, 2020...

and that is a letter from Mr. Rutte to Mr. Klaus Schwab...

in which he thanks Mr. Schwab for sending his book...

and called this: 'a hopeful analysis for a better future'.

Would Mr. Rutte please explore his memory?

It's been less than half a year...

so I don't know how long your memories remain active...

but probably it is still possible to dig this up somewhere?

And answer my first question again, and now honestly, please.

The honest answer is that it is a polite letter.

Unfortunately, you can't read every book you receive from cover to cover...

but you can send whoever sent it a friendly letter to thank them.

Then Mr. Rutte actually says that he didn't lie to me...

but to Mr. Klaus Schwab. But I'd like to ask the question:

Mr. Klaus Schwab, who argues for resetting our world in his book...

to have our national parliamentary democracy replaced by a global technocracy.

He advocates the end of private property...

and Mr. Rutte is apparently not even aware...

of calling this 'a hopeful message for a better future'.

How is it possible that Mr. Rutte...

places a value judgment on a book with a neo-communist message...

when he didn't even read that book?

Thank you. The Prime Minister. -Boy oh boy.

Klaus Schwab is founder of the World Economic Forum.

He has dedicated his entire life...

to bringing the private sector, politics, NGOs together...

to have a dialogue on how we can better this world.

I have the utmost respect for him. I don't agree with everything he says.

I did read his other book about the fourth industrial revolution.

I thought that was a very nice book. Not this book.

So, personally I have tremendous respect for Professor Klaus Schwab...

and his life's work, the World Economic Forum...

which, I think, is of great importance as a meeting platform.

Where also many young people get a chance.

Where major issues surrounding climate...

environmental transitions and energy transitions...

up to and including planning our future industries properly.

Discussions take place in the open, visible to everyone...

so there's no reason to doubt Klaus Schwab's intentions.

Mr. Van Meijeren. -I would also like to ask...

former Minister De Jonge a question, but I think it would be nice...

if Mr. Rutte corrects his message to Klaus Schwab...

that he doesn't think that his book is a message of hope for a better future.

That he didn't read it and he doesn't think it's a good book, as he just stated.

That's the least we can expect from an honest Prime Minister.

That summary lies with the speaker...

Mr. Schwab closely follows all parliamentary debates, so that will be sorted.

Now that we are in the endgame...

thanks to the vaccinations, you don't hear many complaints about it...

because everyone thinks: Great, a holiday.

Of course there will be an evaluation at some point.

Which everybody wants, of course.

Because I'm not the only one who has said this in the past:

Make sure you are prepared for this kind of thing so the next step will be:

Yes, we do want a script now for next time.

And that next time can be in one year or in 30 years.

Well, of course you can't...

keep huge quantities of face masks in storage indefinitely...

because they'll have to be thrown away but you can do more than we have done.

Welcome to our exclusive interview with Bill Gates...

the entrepreneur, Microsoft co-founder, software developer and philanthropist.

Thanks for being here. -Great to talk to you.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's Annual Letter has just come out.

You both write about how this pandemic...

will be as defining as World War II.

What are the key steps to take right now?

We have to do two things at once: We have to bring this pandemic to an end...

primarily by getting the vaccine out in large numbers to the entire world...

and we have to make sure we're ready because there will be another pandemic.

There are so many lessons about...

If there had been no corona, we would have been in an another crisis now.

Because of corona we have a health crisis and lockdowns...

but then we'd be in a financial crisis.

Then we would have had to deal with the opposite of what we're seeing now.

We'd be facing dropping property prices, higher unemployment.

If we had not had corona, that would have been the situation.

Corona actually saved us, if you like.

Temporarily, from an economic problem that was about to happen.

Temporary. After corona?

Yes, I may be considered a gloomy person... Maybe I am a little bit.

I do not know. I always try to be a realist, not a pessimist.

There will come a time when all the measures...

like keeping people working printing more money, will come to an end.

What happens then?

I know several macro-economists who have all kinds of ideas about it...

but it's not a happy story.

Well, then we'll be in a crisis.

And what you're hearing now is that people...

and 'people' is the ECB, and the national heads of government...

try to push that moment as far as ahead as possible.

And some macroeconomists have a very concrete notion...

that pushing the problem forward will work until 2023.

Well, I don't know. I heard them say this.

Macroeconomists say this...

and they are more knowledgeable about the subject than I am.

They say this. 2023, and then it ends. Then it won't work anymore.

Then the ECB method of printing money, zero percent interest stops working...

because you've probably had inflation for several years...

and with a lot of inflation, you have to raise interest rates.

You can't keep interest rates low while inflation is sky-high, as they do in Turkey.

Then people will really suffer from that.

So the interest rate has to go up if inflation remains high.

If that happens, then you get the problem...

that people can no longer afford these high interest rates.

So companies go bankrupt.

You get unemployment, property prices plummet, and so on.

That's what you're going to get. And again, the people I've talked to say 2024.

But, they say, there is one but:

It may happen earlier, if something crazy happens.

If there's another Lehman Brothers incident where a bank collapses.

It could be an Italian bank, they are the most likely to fail.

Confidence in the euro disappears and people panic...

and suddenly start withdrawing money from ATMs.

Then you will get the same effect as in 2007/2008.

It could be earlier than 2024.

But if nothing strange happens, if there's no crazy event like a failing bank...

then people will try to push the problem of the crisis forward for as long as possible.

The European Commission has recently issued 20 billion euros in debt securities.

We are sitting on an economic time bomb, I think. That's how I see it.

And corona was actually a good story...

bluntly stated, to push the problem that was coming at us a little further ahead.

Economically. I'm not saying there's no virus, I am not a virus denier.

I think that what has happened is horrible.

But from an economic point of view, is has been a fantastic model...

to take all the existing problems that kept getting bigger and bigger...

and sweep them under the rug.

Because of corona there are now much bigger movements...

in macroeconomics, in financial systems.

So their consequences will also be much bigger.

And what you see here in one graph...

is the growth of the money supply, the white line...

and the fiscal deficit, that's the budget deficit in America, the forecast.

It is unbelievable. And those lines are drifting apart.

And again, if you compare that with what happened in 2008/2009...

you also had this effect, but it's becoming so extreme now...

And with that we arrive at the reset.

Some really weird things need to happen in this system.

We need very unorthodox adjustments. This is untenable.

A number of things are intensifying due to corona.

Some developments in society become enlarged.

And that is also the case here, because of corona the European Central Bank...

instead of 750 billion 1.6 trillion, 1700 billion euros...

were created from thin air...

to use for support measures for all kinds of distressed countries.

So even more money has been created due to corona, according to the ECB...

that has entered the Euro system...

making the amount of money greater and reducing the value of one euro.

We have arrived at very abnormal times.

I have demonstrated that. Since corona very strange things are happening.

And what happens in an economy that creates unlimited amounts of money...

where the economic situation continues to deteriorate and saving becomes dangerous?

Then people will flee to everything the government can't print.

Can the government print Shell shares? No.

So Shell's shares will rise again at some point...

because that is safer than money.

And the best example is the stock exchange of Venezuela.

You can't imagine a greater economic crisis or more misery...

and what did the stock market do? It soared!

But that's only because there was massive inflation.

So you take part of the hyperinflation...

You make sure your assets remain somewhat intact.

Saving is the dumbest thing you can do.

I'm worried that the euphoria in the stock markets, that continue to rise

could be a very first phase...

of a kind of hyperinflationary movement that people haven't seen coming yet.

I'm not saying we'll have hyperinflation next year...

but if the central banks continue like this...

we can expect this system to get out of control within ten years.

But they know that too, and intervene, and that's what we call the Big Reset.

I came to protest against the Israeli government that doesn't give us any money.

We didn't work during the first months of corona and didn't any money.

I had to close my business and fired all my workers.

Now we're all at home without any money.

We will end up with many more unemployed.

Particularly people in the gray economy are in danger of losing their jobs.

We will definitely see a lot of anger.

We already see that, but it will probably increase by the end of the year.

Because this crisis will with us until we have really found a remedy.

When I see the tragedies in some emerging countries...

like South Africa and some countries in East Asia...

It's all... I don't have too many remedies.

The remedies have to be discussed through dialogue...

by the stakeholders of our global system.

I see the need for such a dialogue.

And I see the need for action. I see the need for A Great Reset.

While we're dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic...

we're also on the brink of a hunger pandemic.

In my conversations with world leaders over the past months...

before the coronavirus even became an issue...

I was saying that in 2020 we'd be facing the worst humanitarian crisis since WWII.

The World Food Program analysis shows also...

that due to the coronavirus an additional 130 million people...

could be pushed to the brink of starvation by the end of 2020.

That's a total of 265 million people.

I'm scared and I don't see any solutions.

I'm afraid of the coronavirus, I'm afraid of starving.

I worry about my parents, my friends. I don't even know what my biggest fear is.

The governments, which we now believe are not really our governments anymore...

but only the puppets of large financial institutions...

decided to print money.

But you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that if you run out of money...

in this case because these financial institutions...

and what we now call the Davos clique have been looting our countries.

They've been stealing money the taxpayer's money on a very large scale.

If you run out of money, you're not going to be saved it you print your own money.

It's not going to make a difference.

But this time, I suppose...

this is from the information that we gather from interviewing investment bankers...

like Catherine Austin Fitts and Leslie Manookian...

that Europe is in very dire straits.

Europe is completely broke.

The ECB, because it purchased all those practically worthless papers...

is broke and our pension funds are broke.

They're gone! -Yes. And if the public finds out...

there will be a backlash...

and they'll understand who's responsible. It's the Davos clique.

So we're going to have to come up with a new system. 'Us'. 'Not them'.

I think, and this is what the Corona Committee is going to focus on...

We have to make plans, we have to make an offer to the rest of the world.

It has to be an attractive offer.

We have to live in a better world, but that is not enough.

You have to have concrete plans.

One of those plans is to revert back to regionalism instead of globalism...

because this is what globalism did to us.

Now we're dependent on global corporations for our food...

for all of our supplies.

So let's focus on the communities and the regions that we come from...

and establish cooperations of small and medium-sizes businesses.

Because none of us needs large corporations.

Let's establish cooperations between small and medium-sized businesses...

and local farming.

That will probably be the most important step to take.

South Africa August 2021

Was it worth it, all those measures...

to save 100,000, 120,000 old geezers?

They're mostly old geezers. That has been discussed.

That is quite an ethical consideration, I would say.

But there are people who walked around with the idea: just let them go.

I don't let the government push me into a certain corner...

because they happen to want a little more power.

That's possible. -This is the police.

We already know that. -You should all remove yourself.

Attention, attention. This is the police.

I think this COVID, that this period is characteristic...

of the period of uncertainty in a society that is being reshaped.

That's how I look at it.

There is a lot of uncertainty during that period. A lot of uncertainty leads to a lot of fear.

Some people get very anxious and they mainly focus on the dangers.

Other people get really rebellious and they start resisting.

As a result, there's more and more polarization between those parties...

and that creates a lot of tension. That tension and its consequences...

are actually essentially worse and more serious...

than the consequences of the virus itself, if you only look at the numbers.

If you look further, it is actually a general expression of the fear...

and the polarity of society, and we have to face it.

Do you want us to steal?

We have no money for food. We don't even have 250 lira.

I swear by Almighty God that we will eat you! We will eat you!

We will eat you!

There are people who have nothing to eat. They can't access their money.

They're kicked out of their homes because they can't pay rent.

If you tell them: you have either that or corona...

I think they might go for corona.

We are in a period that a lot of parties want to abuse.

Who have opportunistic interests in this situation.

If we decide that we don't want this anymore, then we need to unite.

We need to find harmony with nature and with ourselves.

Then we can move from a society in transition to creating a better society.

It is possible but only if we all want it and decide to do it together.

You're wearing a face mask. Why is that? -Because I can be arrested.

We don't trust this government, because the government is killing its own people.

The medical industry, especially in the Unites States...

tested on black people to get to the point where we are now.

Some people get infected again after they've been vaccinated.

They oppress the doctors. They put them into jail.

They put warrants on their heads.

They even shot a medical student.

I feel that the Democratic Party was using the virus...

as a reason to keep people inside and destroy the economy.

They kill, they rape and they steal everything.

We are scared every day, every night. We don't know whether we will die.

There is an underlying agenda with a lot of decisions that were made about COVID.