Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:03,645
So, let's walk through the sales model using a bottom-up approach.
2
00:00:03,645 --> 00:00:06,359
I've kept the overarching themes here on the top,
3
00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:09,720
so you can see what is the motivation for each of these columns.
4
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:14,234
We start with this column with a row for each sales team member.
5
00:00:14,234 --> 00:00:16,035
This is followed by the company,
6
00:00:16,035 --> 00:00:20,759
which is the company name for which you are going to be selling products in bulk,
7
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:22,725
and then comes in column C,
8
00:00:22,725 --> 00:00:24,030
the units per month.
9
00:00:24,030 --> 00:00:29,940
So, this is the number of units this opportunity is likely to create a bookings for.
10
00:00:29,940 --> 00:00:34,185
Contract terms shows the number of months each opportunity is for.
11
00:00:34,185 --> 00:00:37,460
Price for all units in one month shows the number of
12
00:00:37,460 --> 00:00:40,939
units times the sales price per unit,
13
00:00:40,939 --> 00:00:42,804
which is $5 here,
14
00:00:42,804 --> 00:00:47,524
and this is showing the sales price for their projected unit over a month.
15
00:00:47,524 --> 00:00:50,225
For example, how much would Joe Smith,
16
00:00:50,225 --> 00:00:51,920
working with company A,
17
00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:56,760
bring in revenues from the sale of 4,000 units per month?
18
00:00:56,759 --> 00:00:59,750
Then you multiply that with the number of months in
19
00:00:59,750 --> 00:01:03,524
the contract term to arrive at the bookings forecast.
20
00:01:03,524 --> 00:01:07,099
We can go one step further and multiply the bookings forecast with
21
00:01:07,099 --> 00:01:11,464
the win probability to show a more realistic weighted forecast.
22
00:01:11,465 --> 00:01:13,219
So, let's look at this example.
23
00:01:13,219 --> 00:01:18,605
We're more likely to get the sales contract with Corey Jones, Company C,
24
00:01:18,605 --> 00:01:21,500
because it has a wind probability of 0.9,
25
00:01:21,500 --> 00:01:24,680
versus this opportunity with Joe Smith,
26
00:01:24,680 --> 00:01:27,890
Company A, which has a lower probability.
27
00:01:27,890 --> 00:01:33,405
So, the 290k is a weighted bookings forecast,
28
00:01:33,405 --> 00:01:38,030
which shows this is a high probability that you'll win this compared to this one.
29
00:01:38,030 --> 00:01:40,614
It takes into account the probability,
30
00:01:40,614 --> 00:01:43,159
so you can get a realistic estimate of
31
00:01:43,159 --> 00:01:46,325
how likely are we getting this amount versus the amount.
32
00:01:46,325 --> 00:01:49,880
So, this is a bottoms-up sales forecast.
33
00:01:49,879 --> 00:01:52,519
As you can see, here we're using
34
00:01:52,519 --> 00:01:59,929
an opportunity level forecast to project out the bookings for the whole company.
2899
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.