Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
1
Administrative distance is then used as a tie breaker
2
to determine which way to go when multiple routing protocols
3
tell the router to go different ways.
4
as an analogy, administrative distance is used as a tie breaker
5
to determine which way to forward the traffic
6
if OSPF says go left and EIGRP says go right
7
the router uses administrative distance
8
to determine which routing protocol it believes most.
9
Technically, what happens is that the routing protocol
10
with the lowest administrative distance is more believable
11
and its routing information is inserted into the RIB
12
or Routing Information Based or routing table in preference
13
of other routing protocols that have a higher administrative distance
14
so EIGRP has a lower administrative distance than OSPF.
15
EIGRP has an administrative distance of 90
16
OSPF has an administrative distance of 110
17
so internal EIGRP would be preferred over OSPF.
18
So the lower the administrative distance
19
the more believable a routing protocol is
20
you cannot believe anyone more than yourself
21
so a router will believe routes that it originates
22
above routes received from neighboring devices.
23
A directly connected interface has a believability factor
24
or administrative distance of 0.
25
A static route configured to a next hop IP address
26
has an administrative distance of 1.
27
When a static route is configured to a directly connected interface
28
it is deemed to be directly connected
29
and therefore has a believability factor or administrative distance of 0.
30
The reason why static routes have such a low administrative distance
31
is that the router believes that you know more than other routers do.
32
You as the administrator are supposed to know what you're doing
33
and thus the router believes you more than it believes
34
routes received via routing protocols such as OSPF or EIGRP.
35
EIGRP has administrative distance of 90 for internal routes
36
those are routes that originated in EIGRP and will not be redistributed
37
or taken from a different routing protocol and then put into EIGRP.
38
OSPF has an administrative distance of 110
39
RIP has an administrative distance of 120
40
and unknown routes have an administrative distance of 255
41
as you can see EIGRP has a lower administrative distance than RIP does
42
and that’s because EIGRP is a better or more powerful routing protocol.
43
EIGRP will take bandwidth and delay into account when determining the best route.
44
RIP only uses hop count
45
so EIGRP seems to be better than OSPF which is better than RIP.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.