Original subtitles

[music playing]

>> Gentlemen, may I bid you all welcome here,

and say one word before I start speaking.

Eh, I am starting speaking.

And that is the translation button number two is French

and number three is English.

You may wonder why I have asked you to come here.

I have in mind a completely frank and open exchange

of views.

And this is insured to you, and it

is essential for our success.

There is no verbatim quotation of anybody.

And there's no press.

So you are quite free to let yourselves go, if I may say so.

>> My name is Daniel Estulin.

I'm an investigative journalist.

I spent 12 years beginning in the mid 1990s

until about the year 2002, 2003 in

military counterintelligence.

Then I got burnt out.

Normal, it's what basically happens to all of us.

We all burnt out.

I realized that I had a lot of information

that I had accumulated over the years.

And I thought that would be a good way of getting

some of this information out.

And one of the subjects that I thought

would be of interest to the general population

would be this very secretive, not secret,

but secretive organization calling themselves

the Bilderberg Group.

[music playing]

Even before I joined the service in 1992,

I'm in Toronto in a Spanish restaurant

called Segovia with a friend of mine who was in the service,

in the KGB.

And over steak and potato lunch, this man,

let's just call him Vladimir.

And according to him, Canada was going

to be split up into English and French

speaking Canada through a referendum which

was going to be put together from behind the scenes

by these allegedly very powerful people.

Now the reason he said that this was going to happen

is that the powerful people who ran the United States

needed to balance their budget.

1995 comes around, that's three years into the future.

And suddenly, all these characters, all these people,

all these politicians that I've never heard of

begin to appear front and center in front of television screens.

And all the things that this man told me

about three years earlier in 1995 were front and center.

And then I suddenly realized that if the presidents

and the prime ministers were powerless

about the body politic itself, about moving the events forward

into a certain direction, if they were

just bit actors playing their part, then my question is,

who the hell runs the world?

Imagine a private club where presidents, prime ministers,

international bankers, and generals rub shoulders.

And where the people running the wars, the markets,

and governments say what they never say in public.

>> [speaking spanish]

>> Well, the real reason for the interference of the CIA with

Bilderberg was actually the Cold War.

It was coming up at the time.

And they tried to use all the institutes

they could get to well, to steer the public opinion in Europe,

and actually also in the rest of the world where

they had influence.

And Bilderberg was one of them.

And that was the reason that they

financed Bilderberg the first meeting, not totally,

but for a great part anyway.

>> What today is called the Bilderberg Group you could take

it way, way, way back to about the period just after

the Fourth Crusade, 1200, 1204.

And what's today is called the Bilderberg Group or Bilderberg

Society, back then already existed

and it was called the Venetian Black Nobility.

>> Yeah, they're absolutely a continuation of Venice.

Because basically you had a migration

of the Venetian system of oligarchical power over Europe

into the low countries, in fact, into the Netherlands where

Bilderberg was really founded.

And that's an absolute continuity

of the Venetian system of power.

And in fact, if you do some tracing of some of the family

lineages, you'll find in many instances,

the [inaudible] family for example, migrated from Venice

into northern Europe and still remain

a mainstay of the Bilderberg oligarchical structures.

You have a Bilderberg meeting taking place once a year

beginning in 1954.

The first meeting took place at the Bilderberg hotel

in the Netherlands.

And the host of that conference was Prince Bernhard,

the Dutch royal consort, who was a card carrying

member of the Nazi apparatus during the Second World War

period.

>> The people who actually come to Bilderberg meetings,

they're the people who can move forward the agenda

of the societies.

So you have president of International Monetary

Fund, president of the World Bank, president of the European

Central Bank, of the Federal Reserve Board.

You have key presidents and prime ministers

and all these individuals on the political level,

also on empresarial level, and also in the media.

And they all work together with people in the military.

They all work together with representatives

of the banking cartels.

And again, if you're a corporation,

you don't need to control every person in the company.

You just need to control one person who

controls the policy of the entire corporation.

You can say the same thing about countries.

You don't need to control the entire country.

You just need to control enough key decision makers,

be it president, be it prime minister,

be it key senators and congressmen,

people in the Federal Reserve, people in European Central

Bank, and people in the European Commission.

You control them, and through them you control the rest.

>> Every year, Bilderberg has a gathering.

They'll bring together one to 200 people, many of whom

make up the core of the transatlantic

financial and political oligarchy.

And they'll bring together a core group

of powerful individuals, government people, the media,

finance, and prospective young recruits, people

in the political realm who are up and coming

and who are going to be seduced and controlled

by these oligarchical interests.

And very often, these meetings serve

as a kind of a testing ground for whether or not

certain people will be advanced in their political careers,

including a number of individuals who've been elected

President of the United States have

been put through this kind of Bilderberg finishing school

process.

>> The Bilderberg Conference comprises about 130

of the world's or Western world's top decision makers

from the banks and multinational companies, the EU commission.

[laughter]

I'm coming to the politicians.

Also from WTO, IMF, World Bank.

And of course, leading politicians from the US,

Canada, eurozone, and the UK.

And I think though they were clearly

discussing some of the biggest issues confronting

the Western economies at this time,

why have we had no statement either from the Prime Minister

or from the Chancellor, or indeed

from the Minister without portfolio, all of whom

attended in an official capacity.

Why did they offer no statement, even though such decisions may

well have a significant effect on UK government policy

or the livelihood of future UK citizens.

>> In May 1973, Bilderberg Group met at an exclusive resort

at Saltsjobaden, Sweden.

The key point on the Bilderberg meeting agenda

was the oil shock of 1973, the 400% targeted increase

in the price of OPEC oil in the near future.

>> The oil shock, the hoax, it was,

in fact the hoax of 1973 continuing into the late 1970s,

and the whole point of the oil shock was to create a nominal

flow of money into the hands of the Saudis and other Persian

Gulf wealthy nations.

The oil hoax ultimately created an enormous volume

of wealth transfer nominally into the OPEC countries,

the so-called petrodollars.

But all of that money went right to London and Wall Street

to be managed.

So the financial oligarchy and its major centers

used the oil hoax to establish an absolute domination

over world credit to make sure that it no longer went

for any development.

>> You have the charisma of a damp rag,

and the appearance of a low grade bank clerk.

And the question that I went to ask--

[booing]

>> --the question that I want to ask, that we're all gonna ask,

is who are you?

I'd never heard of you.

Nobody in Europe had ever heard of you.

I would like to ask you, President, who voted for you?

And what mechanism-- oh, I know democracy

is not popular with you lot.

And what mechanism--

>> Mr. President.

>> --do the peoples of Europe have to remove you?

>> Mr. President.

>> Is this European democracy?

Well, I've tried very hard not to believe

in conspiracy theories.

But I've been here now for over 15 years.

And I can see there is a move towards supranationalism.

Just look at the IMF in Washington.

Supposed to be independent.

Effectively, it's become a branch office

of the European Commission.

And I've got to know over the years

the Van Rompuys, the Schulzs, you know, the Barrosos, even

the Junkers, the Timmermans.

And it's completely clear, they actually

want to destroy the nation state as a unit.

A few years ago, the Greek Prime Minister

said I'll give you a referendum.

He was removed and replaced by a former Goldman Sachs director.

And whenever the project goes wrong,

whether it's the euro has a crisis or the asylum

crisis with the borders, every single time

there is, for these guys, an opportunity.

It's known as the beneficial crisis.

[music playing]

>> The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open

society.

And we are, as a people, inherently

and historically opposed to secret societies,

to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.

We decided long ago that the dangers

of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts

far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.

The facts they deserve to know.

For we are opposed around the world

by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that

relies primarily on covet means for expanding

its sphere of influence, on infiltration instead

of invasion, on subversion instead of elections,

on intimidation instead of free choice,

on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.

It is a system which has conscripted

vast human and material resources

into the building of a tightly knit,

highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic,

intelligence, economic, scientific,

and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published.

Its mistakes are buried, not headlined.

Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.

No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed,

no secret is revealed.

[gunshot]

>> As in a television soap opera,

there are actually secret spin-off organizations similar

to the Bilderberg Group who play a vital role in the new world

order scheme to use wealth concentrated in the hands

of the few to exert world control.

>> In 1968, George Ball and the Bilderbergers met

and determined that they had to restructure the entire world

along the lines of a corporation.

They decided that the idea of the nation state was outmoded.

It was archaic.

It was standing in their way.

And that therefore, they wanted to have

what they called a world company based

upon the idea of a corporate identity.

[music playing]

>> (SINGING) Don't just talk about it, be about it.

Hungry for the money as soon as I see a dollar.

Money green in my collar, I'm fresh like that.

Yeah, I write the checks, but the checks write back.

Straight to the account, your honey wanna holla.

Only thing that separate me from my money is a comma.

Big bills, big papers, it gets real, big haters.

What it be.

Understand how I said it made.

>> Well, what this is actually is part of what's called

globalization.

You had in the '60s and then continuing,

and expanding form in the '70s and '80s a rash of mergers.

Which corporations merged, agriculture corporations

merged, the financial institutions merged.

And you had a general takeover of the world economy

by these huge mega firms.

The corporate banking mergers tended

to control the corporate industrial mergers

and the agricultural mergers.

So you had basically a world run by this financial,

these massive financial institutions.

>> The concept is one world company limited.

Corporations that have a hell of a lot more power

than any government on the planet.

And you're seeing it right now that governments don't govern.

Presidents don't do anything other

than do what people who put them in power tell them to do.

And so the idea is that all of these corporations,

the Goldman Sachs of this world, JP Morgans, etc,

they are the key people in all key institutions

around the world.

And it's through them that the power base is exercised.

So again, it's not one world government.

It's one world company limited corporations

with a lot more power than any government on the planet.

And in fact this was discussed in the Bilderberg

Conference in 1968 where George Ball, Undersecretary

for Economic Affairs with JFK and Johnson

he said, and I quote, loosely quote, how can we

create corporations that can actually give orders

to governments?

And this is what you have today.

>> [speaking italian]

>> It is about the building of an empire.

And the paradox of this project, of this supranational European

project, is the least popular it becomes

with the people, the bigger mess it creates, the more

power they get at the center.

Well, with the Lisbon Treaty, European nations

have lost almost their entire sovereignty

And we are now back to a pre-nation state condition,

meaning feudalism.

[music playing]

>> You know, we're living on a very small planet with limited

natural resources and an ever-growing population base.

If you extrapolate that into the near future, in one generation

we're going to go to about 10 million people.

Then we're going to go to 14, 18, 21.

It's going to get to the point, we're

always going to have enough space,

because seven billion people space-wise is not a lot.

But we are running out of food.

And we are running out of water.

And we're running out of natural resources.

So for the elitists, for the Rockefellers of this world

to survive-- and I say Rockefeller

not because he's important, but because he is well-known.

He is popular, which is not the same as being important.

For the Rockefellers of this world to survive, most of us

have to die.

[music playing]

>> With an absolutely willful act on the part of precisely

this Bilderberg apparatus.

[music playing]

>> It's not really the idea of capitalism.

Because in the end, what these people have or are,

they already control 90% of the planet.

Every aspect of society, everything you eat,

everything you look at, everything you touch,

mostly is in the private hands of these billionaires today.

But the idea is again, you know, the whole idea

of de-industrializing the world, it's a gradual process.

You could do it, you know, via armed conflict,

but it's costly, and it's also dangerous.

Because you can take everything off the chess board,

them and you at the same time.

But the point is, if you can do it gradually,

started dismantling, you know, the different service

industries, in different sectors of society,

before long you have a Detroit.

And before long you have a Greece.

And before long you have Spain, which

is 70% population or unemployment for kids under 30.

And this is reality.

This is how it's done.

It's a gradual process of de-industrialization, demand

destruction, and zero growth.

And if you talk about zero growth,

the whole concept itself came out of the 1972 study

put together by the Club of Rome.

>> Role of the Club of Rome back in the 1970s was to try

to popularize the big lie that man could not continue

to develop because resources were supposedly limited.

And they used a ridiculous modernized version

of the old argument of Malthus and Aristotle

to simply state that based on mathematical equations,

we would exhaust the resources.

>> Fast forward 40 years, and look what we have today.

We have a Detroit.

In another 40 years into the future

we have the entire world, which is going to look like Detroit.

And Detroit is going to look like paradise.

[music playing]

I know a hidden place up in the mountain in a faraway land.

I will share a room with sheep and monkeys.

Yes, they take milk in their tea.

But she don't believe me.

But she doesn't see the point of it all.

>> Well yes, there was another reason.

And that is that the bailout was a scam, a fraud.

It was under the guise of saving banking institutions, which

they saved temporarily.

They were effectively taking unpayable debt, huge quantities

of unpayable debt, and transferring it

from private corporations to governments.

This didn't make the debt any more payable.

They basically absorbed huge quantities

of worthless paper, speculative, derivative paper,

which could not be paid off in any period of time anyway.

i.e., the governments became bankrupt.

Now you see this in Europe over the last years.

Where each country is being forced

to do the same thing that was done in the US,

take on the massive debts of these banks.

And effectively, leaving them bankrupt.

What you have is the growth of corporate dictatorships

under the banking institutions that

run the governments-- corporate fascism.

And in fact, you see the world increasingly

coming under the control of corporate fascist governments

under the control of the banking institutions.

>> You know, if you kind of go back in history 6,000 years

or so, and you look at who controlled society 6,000 years

ago in ancient Egypt, this weren't the pharaohs.

The high priests basically gave us knowledge one little droplet

at a time.

Just enough knowledge for us to survive and get by,

as we do today.

Just enough for us to get by day to day to day

to day with what meager salaries we earn.

Now so on the one hand, what you had back

then you had the high priest giving us

these droplets of knowledge.

But on the other hand, in the last 6,000 years,

especially now, with technological revolution,

with information revolution and information technology,

people have computers and have access to internet.

And suddenly, all this information,

which for thousands of years which

was only available to secret societies and very

private organizations who passed it on from generation

to generation in very small, you know, tightly knit groups

behind the scenes, you know, underground grandfather

to father, father to son, son to grandson, grandson

to great grandson, etc.

Today, 99% of that information is available through Google.

And anybody sitting in the middle of an Amazon rain forest

with a computer, a laptop, an internet connection almost

has the same access to the information which

the secret societies have tried to protect or hide

from us for thousands of years.

So the dilemma for them is what do we do?

Because we must have the upper hand.

So on the one hand, what you're seeing right now

is they're destroying the world's economy on purpose.

Because again, progress and development

is directly proportional to population density.

So if you have technology, you have more.

If you don't have technology, if you can destroy technology

on purpose, if you go to zero growth, de-industrialization,

demand destruction, there is going

to get to a point in the development of society

where you're not going to have enough technology

to support this rapid population growth

and the base of population is going to collapse.

>> Well, the primary goal is to defend the status

of a uni-polar world, even if that means to prepare

a preemptive global first strike.

The oligarchy want to defend their privilege

to be a superior species.

And they want to keep the rest of the population

deliberately backward and stupid.

And that is why they promote such banal entertainment, which

is only aimed that people stop to think.

>> In the councils of government,

we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted

influence, whether sought or unsought by the military

industrial complex.

The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power

exists, and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination

endanger our liberties or democratic processes.

We should take nothing for granted.

Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry

can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and

military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods

and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

>> Look at Google, Apple, Microsoft, IBM.

These Bilderberg affiliated megacorporations

form an integral part of the United States security

apparatus.

Behind these technologies, enormous streams of capital

are being expended, and more importantly

invested behind the scenes.

>> Now we're at a point where that entire system is

at a breaking point where it's hopelessly bankrupt.

The debt is impossible to pay.

The derivatives, which are purely speculative,

unregulated, gambling bets on top of the debt

bubble itself is estimated at one

and a half quadrillion dollars.

Which is a multiplier of even the most optimistic idea

of global GDP that's completely off the charts.

So this entire system is doomed.

And we're quite frankly at a point

now where it would be no surprise if on any given day

you woke up and found out that the entire transatlantic

financial system had just evaporated.

>> A lot of people think that the British Empire no longer

exists.

But this is an illusion.

Just ask yourself, why is it that

after the big financial crash of 2007,

2008 there was absolutely nothing

done by the G20 or anybody else to re-regulate the banking

system?

And they kept quantitative easing.

They kept zero interest rate policy,

which is really expropriating the majority of the population.

And now, we are in front of an even bigger crash than 2008.

And there are no so called tools anymore

to do anything about it.

So the reason is that the oligarchy controls

what is called globalization.

And globalization is really only another word, another notion

for the British Empire.

It is the combination of central banks, investment banks,

hedge funds, private equity funds, insurance,

and reinsurance firms who control

what is generally called the global financial system.

And in reality, the EU is only the continental sub-entity

of that Empire.

>> Well, the British Empire knows that in the long run it

cannot survive in a world which is based on science

and technology and development.

And therefore, their policy is to stop that kind of technology

and develop.

That's why they target nation states.

That's why, for instance, that they

are adamant against the BRICS and the emergence of the BRICS.

Which is nations which have the strength

and the power and the commitment,

and the mission to building nations

through science and technology.

That has to be stopped in their view.

Therefore, their target is the idea

of the nation state itself.

Destroy nation states in order to preserve and maintain

the power of the Empire.

>> There is absolutely a plan to depopulate the world.

And you simply have to listen to or read the writings of people

like Prince Philip of Great Britain who

has stated explicitly that we should reduce

the population of the world from seven billion people down

to one billion.

He has stated very charmingly that he

would like to be reincarnated as a virus

to try to reduce the world's population.

>> If you kind of play with the numbers,

you realize that I've had almost seven million people have read

my book.

Maybe another 20, 30 million people

are aware of what Bilderberg is.

But my question is, how many millions of people

watch the Oscars?

How many millions of people watch the Super Bowl?

How many hundreds of millions of people watch, you know,

the finale of the Big Brother?

So the point is that when you play with the numbers,

you realize it's easy to sway people's attentions.

And also, because of everything we've been taught

and how we've been taught to behave as people, media,

which forms part of this conspiracy,

they've been able to convince the people

that unless something is on the cover of The New York

Times, the Washington Post, Le Monde, The Economist, Wall

Street Journal, it doesn't exist.

Which is why so many times people say

to me, if what you say is true and it is shocking,

why is it not on the cover of "The New York Times?"

Because again, "The New York Times" of this world, they

form part of the Bilderberg organization.

They form part of all these other societies.

They're part of the elite.

Their job is not to tell the truth,

but to sell a particular vision of reality,

which the elitists need to move their agenda forward.

>> We're in a lot of trouble.

Because you people and 62 million other Americans

are listening to me right now.

Because less than 3% of you people read books.

Because less than 15% of you read newspapers.

Because the only truth you know is what you get over this tube.

Right now, there is a whole and entire generation

that never knew anything that didn't come out of this tube.

This tube is the gospel, the ultimate revelation.

This tube can make or break presidents, popes,

prime ministers.

This tube is the most awesome god damned force

in the whole godless world.

[music playing]

[gunshots]

[explosion]

>> And cut, good.

>> [speaking spanish]

>> Media is often altered to convince the public that

something is happening that is not happening.

There was a movie once made called

"Wag the Dog" about a president who

was involved in a scandal much like Bill Clinton with Monica

Lewinsky.

And the way to get out of the scandal, the White House

concocts a war against the Albania.

During George W. Bush administration,

there was a quote from Karl Rove, who was

Bush's major political adviser.

Rove said that the White House can create its own reality.

And if they don't like the reality

they have created, in 30 minutes they can change it.

Because the White House has total influence over the way

the media reports the news.

[music playing]

>> [speaking italian]

>> Mr. Speaker, this is a first occasion for me,

as I've never previously answered a question

in the House of Commons on behalf of a private

organization for which the government has no

responsibility.

>> [laughter]

>> The Bilderberg Organization exists for the purpose

of holding meetings once a year in various countries.

It exists for no other purpose.

And this year, the meeting was held at a large hotel

near Watford in Hertfordshire.

I didn't receive adequate notice of this question

as it happens, because I wasn't found

in time, to put to hand the list of those who participated

and the agenda which we discussed,

but we always circulate those before the meeting.

And they're readily available.

And I can certainly put any honorable member in touch

with a source of the list of those who took part.

Each year we invite something over 100 people.

It was about 140 this year.

Drawn from both sides of the Atlantic,

from Europe, including Turkey, and from the United States

and Canada.

The people who attend are drawn from the worlds

of government, politics, academia, defense, journalism.

>> That's false.

>> We all attend--

the people who attend change slightly each year.

There's a core of those who regularly attend.

Different people come.

Well, I'm trying to guess at what on Earth people

are asking a parliamentary question about it for

and what they're interested in.

>> Well, some chosen journalists are admitted to the Bilderberg

Conference.

But they are not allowed to write about it, what they hear

or what they say.

And it's actually completely forbidden.

And they don't swear an oath, but they just

promise that they are not allowed to.

And that's why actually you never see in the papers,

even in the big newspapers, good articles about the Bilderberg

meetings and what is happening there.

Because journalists who are allowed to enter,

they are forbidden to write about it.

>> [speaking spanish]

[music playing]

>> [singing] I'm gonna make it all the way, do my best,

do my best.

I'm gonna make it all the way, do my best, do my best.

I'm gonna smile the whole way, do my best, do my best.

You can come and hold my hand, we'll be the best of us, oh,

the best.

>> Security was tight today at the Grove Hotel in this leafy

area north of London.

140 members of the global elite arrived here

for a top secret, hush, hush, off-the-record conference

in the English countryside.

How's this for a guest list?

The head of the International Monetary Fund,

former Treasury Secretary Tim Geitner,

the heads of Amazon.com, Google, and BP Oil, former general

and CIA director David Petraeus.

And what's a top secret cabal of puppet masters

without Henry Kissinger?

All of them came here today for the Bilderberg Conference.

That's Bilderberg, not Build-a-Bear.

Participants are tight lipped about discussions

other than to say topics will range from the economy to jobs

to US foreign policy.

What the organizers call "megatrends

and the major issues facing the world."

Reporters and outsiders are not allowed in,

and everything is off the record.

Organizers say that's so participants "can take time

to listen, reflect, and gather insight."

>> I got in early October from someone in the Austrian

Ministry of the Interior an official document,

which was handed out to all the personnel in the Ministry

of Interior, as well the special forces and the police

departments, basically canceling holidays for the first two

weeks of June as a result of the Bilderberg Conference which is

being held right now in a hotel half an hour from here.

>> [speaking spanish]

>> Well, you know, we're in a hotel in Innsbruck about 35

kilometers from the hotel where the Bilderberg Conference is

actually taking place.

Just getting the information from my sources

inside the Bilderberg Group on the key points which are

being discussed as we speak.

Daniel, I'm pasting for you some of the key discussion

points which will be taken up on this year's meeting.

As you know, the world is in dire shape,

and the financial system can blow out at any moment.

There are a lot of very worried, or should I

say freaked out people who will be attending this year's

conference.

Their only saving grace is that most of the planet

is completely oblivious to what is going on around them.

Good luck to you.

And as always, put this information to good use.

Instead of going to the hotel-- and you can't get anywhere

near the hotel.

There's a five kilometer security perimeter.

And actually from what we're hearing,

it's actually gone over to almost eight kilometers.

So you know, when you're eight kilometers away,

you can't get anywhere near the hotel.

And so as I get the information anyway,

because my sources are inside the conference.

From what we're seeing, it's absolutely impossible

to get anywhere near the hotel.

And I hope somebody does, but I don't think so.

[polka music playing]

And there's some very, very heavy points.

Artificial intelligence, that's the future of humanity,

trans-humanism.

The change from humanity to trans-humanity

to post humanity.

Cybersecurity, that's one of the key issues,

which the Bilderberg has been talking

about for a very long time.

And that has to do with controlling the internet.

Obviously, chemical weapons threats.

Current economic issues, which is the world

is going to hell in a handbasket.

This is the information which he sent me.

And I'm just downloading, you know, all the stuff

on the subject of America.

And in the first two pages of this extract,

seven page extract, I'm seeing this like the fifth time seeing

"perpetual war," "multi-generational threat."

Now give me a second to see what else is there.

Now one of the things about perpetual wars,

perpetual wars require perpetual funding.

Non-ending war, not ending funding.

Which means that you throw as much money

as you want into a particular situation, which is this.

You know, war on terror.

How long?

We don't know, forever.

How much money?

As much as you need.

So the idea is again, you control

both sides of the equation.

You control the left and the right.

You control the dialogue through the media.

And then you push the idea of perpetual war.

[shouting]

[gunshots]

[sirens in the distance]

>> [speaking french]

>> Immediately after the terrorist attack against

Charlie Hebdo at the beginning of this year,

the former US Senator Bob Graham said that if the famous 28

pages of the original September 11 Report would have been

published, this attack would not have happened.

Now what this means is that the original September 11

Commission of the Congress published a report,

and 28 pages are classified to the present day.

But we more or less know what's in it.

It pertains to the role of Saudi Arabia financing terrorism

and Wahhabi Salafist attacks around the world.

Now this has another dimension.

And that is that the Anglo-Americans

have instrumentalized radical Islam since Brzezinski in 1975.

[music playing]

>> Humanity has almost destroyed itself a number of times.

Immediately before the golden Renaissance

there was the new Dark Age.

There was the Black Death, where about half

of the population of Europe was destroyed

not only by a disease, the bubonic plague,

but destroyed by the fact that men were convinced that they

could not solve the problem.

But fortunately, there was a new paradigm then.

There was a Renaissance.

It was the golden Renaissance of Leonard da Vinci in Italy,

of Miguel de Cervantes in Spain, of Shakespeare in London.

Which developed the concept of man

a new paradigm in which we organized our business

as human beings based on the concept of man's morality,

creativity, and free will.

We cannot have a situation where, as in Greece,

60% of the youth have no jobs.

That is killing the future of society.

Or Spain, where it is almost at 60%.

That is killing the future if youth

don't have a mission and a purpose to fulfill.

>> Almost halfway through the second decade of the 21st

century, I ask myself something over and over again,

making an attempt to understand what is happening to us.

Where are we going as nations?

As a world?

What will happen to us if the Bilderberg Group

and their cohorts finally win?

What is the destiny of the human race?

What does it mean to be mortal?

>> That's a very interesting question.

Because there are two ways of talking about immortality.

We all die.

No one so far has discovered a method

by which we can live eternally in our biological form.

So therefore, the meaning of the human mind and the human body

may not be quite the same thing.

For example, people like Einstein,

for example, who over a century ago defined matter, antimatter,

progress, which we're now going into today.

So some people are immortal because of the consequences

of their having existed.

And the best we can do as human beings, which

no other animal can do, is we can

continue to be immortal our participation

in the development of humanity and the development

of our solar system.

So immortality means one thing.

It means either the consequences of your having lived,

the benefits for mankind of your having lived,

one way or the other, as a poet or as a scientist or whatever,

you've contributed something to the wealth of humanity.

And you are, in that sense, immortal.

Or you can be a poor slug who doesn't think,

who has no consequence, no reason to exist,

who just lives and dies.

And that's the choice.

>> I have had certain attempts on the part of the Bilderberg

Group back about 10 years back where I was actually offered

money to cease and desist, go away.

And I describe it in one of my books.

And as I sat there watching this man write a check,

I said to myself and I said to him, help me out please.

How many zeros is one's freedom worth?

He stopped, paused, looked at me, gave me the check,

which I have, you know, check, as a momento.

And he said, Mr. Estulin, you have a nice day.

So the point is, that even if they do kill me once,

I think I've done my bit on this planet Earth.

And I've reached a certain level of immortality.

And I've done my part to pass off the baton

to the future generations.

And it's their job to pick it up and go with it.

Because again, humanity is one.

And we have to do everything in our power

to make sure that we, as society, achieve

this immortality.

And for me, immortality is assuring

the survival of the species, all of the species.

And for us to happen, for this to happen,

we've got to make sure that higher ideals, you know,

on the general level of things, take precedence over money,

and even ones' personal safety.

>> Yes, we can win this war.

But the first step necessary for actually winning

is to know what the war is.

The war is not against merely financial interests

or military powers or even groups

as powerful as the Bilderberger Group.

It is a war against what has been called

powers and principalities.

It's a war against a concept of man which is evil.

It's the concept of man that we are nothing other than animals.

It is an idea which says that human beings do not

have the capability of a creative spark.

That we do not, in fact, have free will.

That we, therefore, cannot act morally or immorally.

We just simply do whatever our desires say.

And it is that concept of man which finds expressions today

in things like the Bilderberg Group

and in the global financial system, which

is based on speculation, usury, and the destruction

of populations.

>> We are on the crossroads.

And the roads we take now will determine

whether we will live in the 21st century as nation state

republics, or subjugated, culled,

and dehumanized crop of slaves.

We are fighting a combined effort

of some of the most brilliant people in history

who scheme against us for the purposes of possessing us.

But the human will is immortal.

Tyrants have killed millions, and yet people

fought and eventually won their freedom.

Freedom stirs the human heart, and fear stills it.

Amidst the deafening the cacophony

of patriotic silence, in certain voices command attention.

Immortality has its moral basis in truth and incorruptibility.

It deserves to be given all the support that it can get.

It deserves to be fought and died for.

[music playing]

[music playing]

[scat] I sing.

[scat] It's my song.

[scat] The more I sing the less I lose.

I look for the difference, but at the end it's all the same,

it's all the same.

I look for a new light, but at the end you are my only star.

I looked for a new step, but at the end you are the only way.

I look for a new mission, but at the end of my eyes.

[scat] I sing.

[scat] It's my song.

[scat] The more I sing the less I know.

Walking in the morning light, walking all alone,

walking in the evening light, walking with my only son.

[whistling]

[scat] I sing.

[scat] It's my song.

[scat] The more I sing, the less I lose.

[scat] I sing.

[scat] It's my song.

[scat]