Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
you
[Music]
you
[Music]
you
in the early years the early decades of
the 20th century Charles Ford was an
eccentric American writer collected
these reports and reports of other kinds
of extraordinary anomalies natural or
para natural and in a book published in
1919 called the book of the Damned
actually presented the first draft of
what would be called the
extra-terrestrial hypothesis theorizing
that these events in these sites in
these reports suggested the presence of
otherworldly visitors when UFOs appeared
and became an international sensation in
the summer of 1947 and after that within
days within days of Kenneth Arnold
sighting On June 24th 1947
speculation about Mars and visitors
began to appear in the press almost all
of it came from people who had read
Charles Forte's book Charles Ford
himself had died in 1932 but that was
the people first thought these things
could be from outer space otherwise
people thought they were Russian
experiments or secret aircraft
experiments the Navy or there were all
kinds of natural explanations some
people thought they were an artifact of
atomic testing and so on not very many
people except the followers of Charles
Ford we're thinking about spaceships
from other planets but eventually by the
mid 1950s the association of UFOs and
extraterrestrial visitors was quite
widespread that it wasn't automatic and
natural it took a while in fact some of
the first people who thought that UFOs
could be extraterrestrial spacecraft
were in the Air Force because people in
the Air Force understood just how
extraordinary the apparent technology of
these things was they knew that there
was no earthly power that could
duplicate that technology they
understood that in a way the general
public probably didn't well no one truly
knows exactly what was going on however
we know that since t2 intelligence was
doing aeronautical analysis from the
German technology that they brought back
world war two from the Russians that
these objects obviously were not coming
from Russia nor were they coming from
the stash of older craft and and the
Horton Brothers and things in Germany at
the time so they could only come to one
conclusion they're not ours they're not
theirs they're from somewhere else and
this kind of put a big Kobashi
on the military careers many of the
people at - - intelligence at Wright
Field according to the story all the
copies of the estimate the situation
were destroyed but that couldn't have
been true because as a matter of fact we
have several people who said they saw
one including captain ruppelt himself
and the Pentagon's major person at the
so called UFO desk in 1952 major dewey
for an a they said that it was
interplanetary and it is intelligently
controlled in the interplanetary
fournaye who saw the whole document said
listen these guys were trying to shake
the tree up in washington this was a
preliminary thing and he said he didn't
see that they he read the report he
didn't see that they had the evidence to
make this conclusion but they were it's
an estimate of situation ten minutes
after you write I worked in intelligence
ten ten minutes after you write an
estimate a situation it's it's it's
stale
the first major UFO / planet was a
retired Marine Corps major named Donald
Kehoe keel worked in the Pentagon he had
once been an aide to Colonel Charles
Lindbergh he had all kinds of contacts
he was a popular writer he wrote stories
adventure stories and pulp magazines
usually with an aviation theme
he also wrote a fiction stories about
World War one flying and I read those
things every time they came out ten
cents of the copier pop magazines
beautiful things
so when true magazine which was a very
popular men's magazine back years and
years ago decided that it wanted to look
into the question of what flying saucers
were thought well Don key is a good guy
he's got all these Pentagon contacts he
knows about aviation knows a lot of
pilots and many pilots reporting UFOs so
he spent about eight months
investigating the story for true
magazine and the article that he
published in January 1950 issue of true
was titled the flying saucers are real
and Donald Keough became probably the
most important person in the history of
UFOs that article which came at the very
end of the year was sort of a
psychological bomb for many people
because it seemed to expose a hypocrisy
in Air Force intelligence and not only
that seemed to rather clearly point to
the extra-terrestrial hypothesis when he
was making the discussion with me
knowing it and he was essentially
telling me though that I was not doing
the right things as a job and I told him
that well in a way it's your fault
because if you hadn't written those
stores and got me so interested in the
Air Force I wouldn't be here did they
make you want to be a pilot or something
yes it did
Keele concluded from interviewing his
airforce contacts interviewing pilots
other credible witnesses that flying
saucers were coming to earth probably
from Mars that sounds rather ridiculous
today but in those days even many
reputable scientists thought it was at
least possible that Mars Harvard in an
intelligent civilization this was before
the space probes and other advances told
us that this was not possible but at the
time it was considered a reasonable
speculation that Mars was inhabited Kiel
thought they were peaceful they were
coming here with good intentions but
they were afraid of us because we had
sent our interceptor aircraft after them
and so they were shy about establishing
contact but they were watching us and
they started watching us intensely
because they began monitoring our atomic
bombs this was a version of the
extra-terrestrial hypothesis for the UFO
age in 1957 he assumed directorship of
an organization called the National
Investigations Committee on aerial
phenomena which brought together all
kinds of people with solid professional
and middle-class credentials to argue
for interplanetary visitation to lobby
for congressional hearings NICAP began
as a hugely ambitious operation but the
funding that Kiewit counted on did not
materialize that's an interesting story
in itself but in the late 1950s up until
the later 1960s Kehoe and ICAP
represented respectable Pro UFO opinion
and this was at a time when although
there was a great deal of skepticism the
idea that UFOs could be real even
extraterrestrial was not quite the
bargeman alized idea that it would
become in later years
I think that scientists at the time
despite the interest that was there in
possible life in outer space and the
knowledge of astronomy what was possible
in terms of solar systems and chemistry
in the galaxy scientists basically had
literally no conception that aliens
could potentially visit here you trust
the big paradigm maker at the time and
the big paradigm maker the time is
Einstein and by gum you don't go against
Einstein he told you this he put the
10-pound finger on you you cannot go
faster than the speed of light special
relativity in the speed of light how
much I think in considering the
possibility of let's say ET visitation
or even ourselves going out and
exploring other stars in the future even
though general relativity had come along
and actually changed that picture most
scientists with an instant response
would think on special relativity terms
and say well the velocity of light is
the limitation you can't go fast the
speed of light and therefore to conceive
of us exploring stars or other people
coming here it just bits it's it's too
far they they just can't get from here
to there we might explore our own solar
system but that's probably as far as
we're going to get but the truth of the
matter is that in general relativity
that's not not the case there are
options there and in fact one of my
favorite examples was when our Carl
Sagan was putting together his book and
movie contact he wanted to have some
kind of more or less instant connection
to faraway locales and so he approached
Kip Thorne at Caltech who was a friend
of his and says I want this to be as
scientifically reasonable as possible
and so Kip decide to look into the
possibility out of general relativity
that you could beat the speed of light
well it turns out that in general
relativity we can begin to talk about
manipulating the space-time variables
which was not the case in special to
and in fact you could say make wormholes
which is ought to be like Subway's
through space or whatever so he came
back and told Carl I know you you could
you can incorporate that but he got
sufficiently interested as as a
theoretical physicist
it began Tipton that he began having his
graduate students look into these more
bizarre outcomes predictions of general
relativity and so in fact they came up
with ways that you could beat the speed
of light with the so called wormhole
shortcuts through space-time but of
course now that's become a very
legitimate area of general relativity
research and so there's a lot of work
going on looking at wormholes so-called
warp drive in the anime turned out that
wormholes there's a possibility of
engineering them and people are still
looking at that at least the principles
of it warp drive is as far as we can see
is going to be tough well here we are at
the beginning of the 21st century and so
we know they're going to be a
twenty-fourth and a twenty eight and a
30th century science and the scientists
of those years are going to look back
and see how primitive we were so really
a scientist if he's up to it can't rule
out anything
I have several editions of an astronomy
textbook out and I talked about this
limit of speed of light and I put a
footnote in there saying something like
you know at least according to our
current understanding of physics and I
got a moderately irate letter from some
scientists you know what this is an
outrageous that you would put this in
and I thought well how outrageous for
him you know does he is he really on
record that our physics of 1987 or
whenever this was is the last word I
mean it doesn't mean you should start
assuming things can go fast in light but
but you just shouldn't assume that we
know everything and as Arthur Clarke
said you know any superior intelligence
is going to look like magic to us
anything that anything that violates our
crude understanding of the universe that
we have is to assume that our
sure we do yeah yeah and you have to be
ready for the thing that's out there
that it's violence I was reminded back
in the late 1890s how the head of the
British Academy of Science said we know
it all we're just wrapping up the
details and there's a who was it was it
Haldane or one of the famous British
scientists spacecraft the space flight
is utter bilge is a famous line I mean I
love planks phrase which could be
paraphrased that is how does science go
forward he says funeral by funeral so I
don't I really don't think it was only
Lightspeed again it was it was it was
more sociological psychological and
philosophical reasoning that led
scientists to reject UFO sightings aw
there's another one there too this is a
corollary to the we don't know it we
don't unaware but it can't be true we
will not we the scientists will not use
data that comes from the public that
comes from the great unwashed and of
course physicists and astronomers well
at least the physicists don't ever do
this or chemists astronomers do a little
bit with amateur astronomers but but
other scientists don't and they're just
not used to saying well we could be
getting some valuable evidence from
people who are out there one of the
themes that comes out in the early
history of UFO G was that the UFOs
weren't actually there for investigation
but the people who reported them were
and this is what led to a whole group of
psychological kinds of interpretations
and then they were essentially negative
ones the person stupid they're lying
they're drunk they don't know what
they're talking about they're crazy and
then you let off the hook right there's
no real challenge to science there's no
real challenge to what you currently
believe because it's this person's
problem you know something wrong with
them
so we don't have to rethink things like
interstellar travel you know
interdimensional tea you know whatever
you know Mike Minor might not be out
there there was a terrific example of
this that's that's in my chapter in
there and it was a Russian spacecraft
satellite called Zond
zond for I think it was and that was a
big rocket booster and that reentered
over the United States came in through
the atmosphere
as we know from you know modern films
and the disaster shuttle breakup and
things like that these things come in
start to glow they start to they get hot
from friction with the atmosphere they
start to break up just like a meteorite
or a fireball and you get a string of
fragments and I've actually seen one of
these I saw one of the shuttle tanks
re-enter over Hawaii once and it's it's
amazing it's remarkable it's like a big
mass of fireworks the one I saw they
were all kind of sparkling and there
they're moving across the sky together
because you know there's like the big
piece out in front and some smaller
pieces behind and they're slowly
spreading out but what you see moving
across the sky is that string of Lights
together and we could say that's the
perception in this case now I was given
on the Condon Commission a folder of
what I remember is something like 150 or
200 reports of this and one of the
strangest things I experienced there was
that in general the people who knew what
they were looking at the people who said
gee that must be a satellite re-entering
the atmosphere and breaking out
they gave the shortest and Christmas
reports you know I saw this bright
things and lights in the sky I think
maybe it was a satellite breaking up
it's kind of the end of the story the
people who most badly misconceived it
they conceived that they saw something
else gave the most elaborate and
detailed reports and some great examples
of that there were even a progression of
stages there were the people who as I
say the people who said oh this is
satellite and the story then there were
the people who were describing what they
saw and they said I saw a string of
lights you know it kind of in a line
moving across the sky well that's
basically absolutely accurate great
great example of the perception
correctly reported as a conception and
so on then were people who started
introducing a very subtle difference
there were people who said I saw a set
of lights flying in formation
the sky a little bit of a different idea
there you know it's the idea that
somehow they're under control I just was
relooking at that chapter that I wrote
and I noticed there was a person who
said they were flying in perfect
military formation now if you know what
he saw that's not a bad description but
on the other hand if you come in and
you're talking to this guy next day and
he says I saw these things flying in
military formation you think well you
know was were these really a bunch of
different craft flying along in military
formation that's that's not what he saw
but that's his conception and then
finally you know we get to the this end
as I say with the detailed descriptions
there were people who said I saw a black
cigar-shaped object with a row of lights
and of course they didn't see the black
cigar-shaped object they conceived it it
had to be there because there had to be
something for those lights to be
attached to then there were the people
who said I saw a black cigar-shaped
object with a row of lighted windows and
we absolutely had reports like that and
then the last two or three that were the
furthest off you know I saw the
cigar-shaped probably the windows it was
so close we could have seen people
inside the windows if there had been
anybody in there my dog was barking and
whimpering and and there were fires in
the fields outside of town the next day
and you know all of that and you know
you come in as a either inexperienced or
and maybe an inexperienced UFO report
you know investigator looking for
reports of alien craft you know those
sound like pretty good reports and so
you know they're all the same thing and
they were all a satellite breaking up in
the atmosphere so really tough to to
translate those into real understanding
as proof of the EXO tres hypothesis
remained elusive some ufologists began
to look in other directions and some of
the more 40 inclined ufologists the ones
who were attracted to the idea that UFOs
were part of a broad range of anomalies
and mysteries speculation grew that
there weren't extraterrestrial visitors
that these were actually paranormal
entities who is the realm of year drew
in 1960s about the mid 1960s the idea
begins to form that UFOs really aren't
what they appear to be they may not even
be craft they may not even represent a
technology in the ordinarily understood
sense of those words that these were
actually shape-shifting entities from
some unknown Otherworld a parallel
universe a demonic realm something like
that and there was an attempt to link
flying saucers not only with other weird
phenomena that people reported like
strange creatures and so on but also to
traditional folkloric entities like
fairies and angels and demons which were
also interpreted as not literal entities
but as representations of kind of
cultural expectations about supernatural
experience these things existed in some
sense the experiences of them were real
but but they weren't what they appeared
to be that they really were something
else representing some kind of unknown
other reality the most influential
writers in this new school were jacques
valet and John keel in 1969 Jacques
Vallee wrote a book called passport to
Magana where he links modern UFOs to
traditional beliefs about fairies demons
gods entities of various kinds
at the time passport ammonia was
published it was looked on more as an
ancient astronaut type text rather than
a real subversion of the whole
extra-terrestrial hypothesis most people
read it and said well okay the aliens
must have been around from time
immemorial you know this is just more
evidence for the same but in fact what
Malay was saying was was something quite
different
was that the UFOs are just a part of
some larger mystery John keel who is
much less intellectually sophisticated
but just as influential as valet wrote
several books in which he revived
traditional demonology and he argued
that UFOs and their entities and all
kinds of other strange creatures were
literally demanding entities he didn't
say they were from Hell but he called
the renamed hell the super spectrum the
super spectrum was also related to the
traditional occult idea of the etheric
realm a realm on another level of
vibrational frequency it did sort of
mesh with the spirit of the times
the idea of getting away from technology
you know scientists and government as
the good guys
which you know you see in all those
1950s monster outerspace movies the
heroes are always scientists and
soldiers complete revolution there they
become the villains and the
counterculture in the notion of a
new-age relief in this one more
spiritual sort of thing becomes very
popular so this idea of valet is that
there might be some kind of mysterious
force I had almost a star wars since
controlling yeah I'll out there and is
responsible for many manifestations of
the paranormal that quickly call it on
now to critics this was really an
abdication of Reason logic and science
that this was really a reversion to
magical thinking and a rejection of
science and reason as the right tools
with which to investigate phenomena but
the absence of conclusive proof for
these you know extraordinary phenomena
was very frustrating to a lot of people
and some people had come to this less of
scientists than is mystery mongers they
weren't really hard clear thinkers
ballet was trained as a scientist ballet
was trained as a physicist ballet was
intellectually sophisticated and not as
inclined to rank paranoia as keel and
his followers were but still underlying
his reading of what was going on was
really magical thinking that really had
as much to do with traditional occultism
as with science
out of the paranormal school of you
Falah djegal theory there evolved the so
called psychosocial hypothesis which
actually rejected paranormal processes
but did see UFO reports and experiences
as part of a broad range of folkloric
supernatural phenomena but instead of
ascribing them to demons or parallel
universes or some other unknowable place
held them to be psychological phenomena
sometimes extraordinary psychological
phenomena this school really grew among
European ufologists and to this day is
fairly popular in in Europe representing
a kind of skeptical ufology which is
making its own variety of extraordinary
claims they tend very much to look for
answers in what you might call tradition
the idea that you are that certain ideas
have been passed along they want to find
cultural antecedents you know it here
are the here's the same imagery as
abductions we can find it in science
fiction we could find it in stories of
fairy kidnap you can find it in all
sorts of cultural predecessors that
doesn't mean that there's some kind of
organizing force it just means that it
has something to do with the way we
think and believe and there's really no
mysterious unknown phenomenon involved
critics of paranormal and cycle social
approaches to UFO theory pointed out
that there is a body of physical
evidence for the presence of something
anomalous that seems irreducible that
doesn't seem amenable to prosaic
explanation or to being contained within
known knowledge at this stage and so
they would respond to psychosocial
theorists and paranormalists as saying
and this isn't all just Airy fairy
this isn't all subjective there actually
is some objective evidence that
something strange is going on
and the paranormalists and the
psychosocial skeptics could never really
adequately rebut this argument and
eventually some ufologists who had gone
over to the paranormal or psychosocial
side said yes the physical evidence is
really the core evidence it really is at
the core of the controversy
it's amazing how quickly galaxies are
formed the
old Space Telescope did a couple of very
deep surveys very long exposures to look
for the most distant clusters and
individual galaxies and found that
galaxies formed sometime around the
first billion year age of the universe
and so that means the stars of course
which constitute galaxies have been
around that long so a civilization could
be rather old you have to assume of
course that evolution took place and
that takes some time but certainly
civilizations at least a billion years
older than ours are theoretically
possible maybe even much older than that
the first job one generation of stars
has to go by you know I think four to
five million years well it depends I
mean the very heaviest star is about
pretty quickly the involvement time
skills of even less than a billion years
so it's possible that there could be
civilizations that are very very old how
what would be what would the limit well
just say ten billion years that'd be
about twice as old as as the
civilization could be ten billion years
or well I suppose so I mean the
symbolization of all during the first
say four billion years of existence of
university that's not out of the
question more conservatives say it's
easy to imagine a civilization at least
a billion years older than we are leave
at that ten billion well it's kind of
stretching it but it's not out of the
question in my view the universe is
really old compared to our age not super
old because you know you can imagine
what a trillion years old and we're not
nearly close to that but it's pretty old
and what that means is I'm ticularly
with recent astronomical discoveries is
that in fact the average civilization in
the galaxy how can I even speak of it
because just pick the average age of a
planet like Earth in other words in a
solar system you know what would be the
average age of a solar system or like
the Sun like solar system the answer is
a billion years older than ours so when
you start imagining what a billion year
old civilization would be like the
answer is I can't imagine it so I
imagine almost anything including yes
the earth is just a place to come and
enjoy the local natives and or what have
you but but it really means that that
almost anything is possible to be able
to be honest so
I find it difficult that my mind does
begin to reel actually when I think
about billion years civilizations well
so a lot of people will say something
like what would a technology be liked
it's a billion years in advance of us I
say I don't need a billion years give me
a thousand years and if you don't think
that would be kind of amazing just think
back a thousand years in hand some guy
living in the 11th century a light bulb
let alone a generator a nuclear power
plant
you
I have an answer
I think one of the things that may have
been left out of the famous Drake
Equation about trying to estimate how
many what fraction of solar systems have
planets what fraction of those planets
have life by the law is that technical
civilizations may only last a thousand
years or ten thousand years you know
that we've begun we're I don't know I
I'm not sure we could be that optimistic
about our own culture what we're seeing
and whether we get off the earth and get
out there before we use up all the
resources I mean we may only have one
shot at doing that so it may be that the
fraction of cultures that are around
long enough to be interested not at is
small plus then there's the evolutionary
window that you know you're only a
species for four ten billion years I'm
ten million years that's kind of the
turnover time for evolution so so the
idea that cultures once they achieve
space travel remain interested in
everybody else you know seems small to
me I don't think that's probably likely
I guess the point is simply that Fermi's
paradox is a bigger paradox now that was
5060 years ago and Fermi first made his
famous quip so we've got to face up to
it and I think that the the problem is
that the scientific community is
unwilling to consider the possibility
that in this is giant more asked which
is the the field of UFO reports that
there might be lurking some really valid
signal it's just a mindset that that
can't be and I think that's I think
that's actually to the detriment of
science i and bernie hey Bruce Maccabee
Jim Dierdorf
put together a paper for the journal the
British interplanetary society which it
which is a very well-respected journal
and first covered the what we began with
Fermi's paradox you know famous makes
the claimed expression by Fermi which
which which did take place when he said
well all astrophysicists looking out at
all those stars and all those galaxies
know that I'm
we want to really be pumped up with
hubris there's got to be other et
civilizations out there furthermore if
you look at the statistics of travel
even if you're very conservative and say
you can't beat the speed of light and
each time you go to a new star you stay
there for a million years before you go
off to look at another star nonetheless
you end up saying the galaxy should be
colonized by now because after all we're
a relatively young star were less than
four billion years old
we've got stars in our galaxy ten
billion years old that's plenty of time
for for us to be colonized so where are
they and the answer at the time this is
back in
I don't know 40s 50s well as well
probably speed of light limitation so
looking at that we said okay well that
limitation now has begun to evaporate
due to the new understandings and
predictions coming up general relativity
so that's not the issue well what about
what Condon said in his report well
that's not really an issue either
because we now have better data better
sightings more evidence so finally came
down to least in that paper we sweet and
we talked about a couple of cases at
Bruce Maccabee had been directly
involved investigating that's seen
pretty good and then you finally get to
the issue of well that's the case and
why don't we see the evidence um well
you can claim that UFO sightings are
possibly evidence but of course that
hasn't met the scientific standard of
really being proven and then the
question is well if they're kind of here
but they're not showing themselves why
is that
one possibility is that if you're a
super advanced race super advanced
technology what some value to you you
don't need slaves you don't need
minerals out of the ground you don't
need this you don't need that you can
basically make whatever you want so the
only thing of value would be the
intellectual property and creativity of
an uncontaminated species uncontaminated
uncontaminated being because I show up
here and say whoa internal combustion
machine we would have thought of that or
look at those musical scales now that's
that's really something and but the
minute they land and we shake their
hands 100 years with them and we've lost
our value and also as we know from
interacting with primitive societies the
shock and disrupt the society presumably
they would know that too so what
Dierdorf likes to point out is that okay
they're not going to make themselves
immediately known or obvious reasons
because it would destroy our value to
them on the other hand and would be a
shock on the other hand they know it's
only a matter of time even if it's only
when we get our own space ships go out
there and run into them so we do have to
kind of be brought along and our
maturity to accept this as a possibility
and so kind of a covert peekaboo process
would be the favored one and you know
that could be the case obviously we
don't know for sure there's almost
nothing I can think of good that would
come from landing and making contact
with another civilization that is not
either comparable to yours in
development or is so sophisticated that
they can handle it and when you think
about the scenarios we could all dream
of science fiction about contacting in
other words were the aliens and we we
have this ability to travel we develop
this technology we start flying around
the galaxy we encounter another
civilization that's less advanced than
us would we land and the answer is I
certainly would would not
yeah and I won't go through the long
long list of bad things that can happen
but there's it is a long list and so it
by the way raises the question of when
could contact even occur when you think
about it that way and you realize that
despite all the science fiction stuff in
fact I think that societies would would
pull back from contact and not do it
when does it happen
actually and that to me is the more
profound question and I don't have an
answer that that there is an awful lot
of us assuming that they would be like
us and I tend to fall into that trap
frequently and it spits very hard very
hard not to do it it may be of course
that if the extraterrestrial
intelligence were sufficiently different
from us we would not recognize it we
would not know it was there we couldn't
make sense of it and possibly vice-versa
but you know that certainly we don't
know how technology is going to progress
right now it seems to be accelerating
going very very fast will it you know
level off will it taper will there be
various plateaus but the different nough
sub X tricked rational intelligence is
something that has to be taken into
account when we think about the
possibilities of contact and if contact
is going to occur and you know it
we might not notice it I mean sad but
true well there could be good reasons
why they don't say hello it could be if
they're trying to keep our civilization
from suddenly imploding because we're
encountering something that's beyond our
ability to assimilate it could be that
this is part of the plan to bring a new
civilization into the fold to gradually
expose the phenomenon I think that there
are a lot of reasons why it wouldn't
just come and land here if they if they
so chose our own experience with South
Pacific civilizations
in European technology you know in the
19th century should it should answer the
question I mean those civilizations
would practically destroy it well in
fact it's true when we encountered
ourselves more primitive civilizations
we tend to destroy them but it may be
even more severe than that I mean we
don't tend to to try to initiate contact
with them with a group of ants do we
when we don't know how far advanced a
civilization might be how many surprised
we're tens of thousand but certainly
decades or even centuries I would see as
a possible timescale for making contact
known if you look at the UFO reports
they're oftentimes extremely convincing
to the people who see them and witness
them but the event never lasts long
enough never has enough exposure to sort
of rise to the surface of national
attention and it could be that that that
is part of a deliberate strategy I mean
it could be one way to gradually make us
collectively as a civilization realize
that there's more to reality than what
we experience every day around us but
without up suddenly upsetting the whole
apple cart without suddenly sort of
challenging all of our structures and
our politics or economics it could which
could be very devastating here's another
thought maybe it's already taking place
maybe that you know flying around or
whatever in a kind of liminal way right
at the margins of our reality is in fact
the first step to towards a Content you
know that that contact would not be
something which would be abrupt but
maybe is designed to take place over
thousands of years so that the impact on
us is yep this this is actually how if I
were in charge how I would manage
contact and this is sort of getting back
to this idea of the dawning realization
that you know if if everyone reaches the
same conclusion at once it would be very
exciting if slowly more and more people
are drawn into one position or the other
and then finally there's just a small
very small group of holdouts that
maintain a contrary view of what will
buy in the case of something like
contact if we're talking about
civilizations billions of years older
than us what would be the rush in modern
North America we're always in a rush
no we wouldn't think of building a
cathedral say over a period of 800 years
as was done in an evil times give it a
few years but those if something were
truly momentous then indeed it could
could take place very very slowly over
many people's lifetimes and and what
this would mean if it were to take place
over many people's lifetimes is that
there would always be there would be a
growing group of people who quote thinks
something's going on with a lot of other
people who still don't agree with them
but why would there be a rush
requirement and something is delicate
and portentous you might say is
contacting another civilization well
this becomes more just tried which is
that you ready for it I mean you're
really ready for it
meaning that you are at such a level
that it will not affect your social
mores it will not affect your
technological underpinnings because in
fact the best way for aliens to
completely screw us up is to land here
and say here's the box for free energy
go use it you know and all of a sudden
everything here just falls apart you
know why there have to be gasoline
stations oh gee all those people just
lost their jobs and why I mean do you
just go on and on and on and just the
whole places becomes a nightmare of you
know so so you have to have a society
that can handle this contact whatever
that means you know and I can just
conceive of it my 21st century you know
small human mind here which I don't
think is big enough necessarily get get
our arms around it but I do think we're
a long way away from it but what would
be the appropriate moment for contact
and so that's another reason why I think
I'm pessimistic I used about scientists
and I think I'm realistic about whether
or not we can expect contact and my
realism says no actually it's an
interesting interesting set of
challenges I I personally am NOT this is
worried about these sort of fierce
destructive aliens as a lot of people
are because I think what we're finding
out through political science is that
there
a lot of forces that tend to put really
aggressive societies out of business and
it's not a it's not a popular message
when I talk to people who read the
morning paper it's less popular now with
what's going on in the Mideast but
there's a lot of growing evidence within
within political science on the kinds of
conditions that lead to peaceful
coexistence and why they're likely to
prevail and what I have to do as a
psychologist is if I'm trying to imagine
what et might be like is while being
being aware of the problem of
anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism
and so forth this is to try to say okay
now what's out there that seems to be
pretty robust what is there out there
that we've learned that applies in
different historical epics that cuts
across cultures and may cut across
species and those are the things that I
see is the fairly useful hypotheses you
know to try to try to follow up such as
such as interstellar tit-for-tat or
negotiation that if in fact you find a
communicative civilization and if in
fact there is a way to communicate in a
timeframe that's meaningful what you do
is you indicate an interest in
collaboration and getting along sharing
information and so forth but you don't
just sort of give it all away at once
you wait for some sort of reciprocal
concession it's known as the golden rule
it's known as tit-for-tat there's a
number of other names for it it appears
in science it appears in biology it
appears in social science it appears in
religion and given the universality of
the of the reciprocal relationships
that's one way to start thinking about
bargaining or interacting with et
you
[Music]
[Music]
you
you
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.