Original subtitles

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

and here is the lady's name and please

welcome John Smith hello good afternoon

welcome back hopefully you've all been

enjoying the conference so far and I'd

like to take this opportunity thank you

for coming and also for the a/v team for

having me here it was a bit short notice

and this is the first conference I've

actually spoken it so again there's been

one or two changes in relation to this

the presentation I'm going to do this

now is slightly different we're taking a

different look on an alternative view of

the judicial system or the lack of a

judicial system we've actually I'm going

to do is I'm going to first of all just

point out as a player video just to give

you an indication as to where we're

going to do a where we're going to go

with this and then after that we're

going to explain why the common or why

there is a need for a common or court

why the system is feeling and how to

grab a convenient courts the choice is

your than yours versus we were running

the workshop on Monday I think I'm doing

too well actually going into the

nitty-gritty on Monday where we're

actually showing you how to convene

actual courts in relation of this just

now what I'm going to do is we'll stop

just now I will continue the first show

just now in just to share in equality

these days about the fact that the

richest 1% have so much more than

everybody else but most of the focus

seems to be on the United States and it

strikes me that the same story needs to

be told about global inequality too so I

did some research and this is what I

found from reliable sources like the UN

it turns out that while the u.s. is

totally out of whack things are actually

way worse for the planet as a whole

let's start with this graph a perfectly

even distribution of wealth among all

living people with everyone divided into

five equal groups

now let's show how much each group

actually has shocking right 80% of the

world's people barely have any wealth

it's hard to even see them on the charts

meanwhile the richest 2% they have more

wealth than half of the rest of the

world let's look at this chart another

way let's take the whole world's

population all 7 billion of us and

reduce it to just a representative of

100 individuals here they are poorest

people on the Left richest people on the

right now let's show how the world's

total wealth roughly 223 trillion

dollars is distributed the vast majority

have practically nothing nothing with

which to educate their children nothing

with which to pay for basic medicines

while the richest 1% they've accumulated

43 percent of our world's wealth the

bottom 80% meanwhile Nets eight out of

every ten people have just 6 percent

between them but even this doesn't

really show how extreme things have

become the richest 300 people on earth

have the same wealth as the poorest 3

billion so the number of people it takes

to fill a midsize commercial aircraft

have more wealth than the populations of

India China the u.s. and Brazil combines

we can also see this difference

geographically with a huge and growing

gap between a few rich places versus the

majority of the world for most of

history things were much more equal 200

years ago

rich countries were only 3 times richer

than poor countries by the end of

colonialism in the 1960s they were 35

times richer today they're about 80

times richer rich countries try to

compensate for this by giving aid to

poor countries about 130 billion dollars

each year that's a lot of money so then

why does the wealth gap keep getting

bigger one reason I found is that large

corporations are taking more than 900

billion dollars out of poor countries

each year through a form of tax

avoidance called trade mispricing on top

of this each year poor countries are

paying about

600 billion dollars in debt service to

rich countries on loans that have

already been paid off many times over

and then there's the money that poor

countries lose from trade rules imposed

by rich countries to get access to more

resources and cheaper labor economists

from the University of Massachusetts

calculate that this costs poor countries

about 500 billion dollars a year

altogether that's more than 2 trillion

dollars that flows from some of the

poorest parts of the world to the

richest every year rich government's

like to say they're helping poor

countries develop but who's developing

who here this makes me think that

there's something wrong with the basic

rules of the global economy

it can't be okay that the wealth of our

planet is becoming so concentrated in

the hands of such a tiny number of

people the only reasonable response it

seems to me and our only hope is to

change the rules

interesting

you're asking yourself just know why

we're looking at this how all boys that

boils down to money that's all it's

about

we've recently speakers over the last

few days go on about the One World Order

what's happening just now and the fact

that people don't understand what's

going on when we actually look at the

judicial system this plays a large part

on it it's the control that they have

the control mechanism so again what we

were doing we're looking first of all of

the monetary side this this was taken it

was actually passed on by a friend and I

thought right we're going to use this

just to show you just to let everyone

know the graph that came up I'm we-we-we

over that side in fact I'm not even sure

if I'm on the chart but in relation to

the richest people over this side if

there's anyone here that send this 1%

I'd like to meet in the bar afterwards

but this good this this is what this is

where it starts now we're going to be

the corruption here and what's happening

with the government's it says they're

not looking after people this system is

designed to protect vested interests

it's certainly not about justice and

unfortunately I came across the judicial

system a number of years ago I took on

the state as a horse or blower and ended

up suffering now what I'll do is I'm

going to point to one or two things I

point to detail around just now this is

the first conference of actually done

the common law court and he up speaking

with the common law court just explain

how it operates I'm not the common law

court you are the common law court men

and women living men and women if I just

assure Francis now just quickly does

anyone know what illegal fiction is yes

yes surprise yeah okay a few hands they

are maybe 25% what we're going to do is

we're going to explain some of their

their the myths beside behind the system

just now

to system and we'll give you a few

pointers just to tell you what is

happening with him this justice system

or lack of it and I came from Bolivar

north the casino Backlund years ago

because the general manager was very

successful I came across a couple of

dodgy directors and to protect my

license I left as a general manager the

gaming world bore a wheel of it

the government wanted to know what was

going on and they find out that he had

been negligent and they allow these guys

to commit various claims now why the

gaming world covered this up is because

it would had a huge effect on the gaming

revenue taxes so we wanted to cover the

ups of trust me out I ended up losing

everything

the directors went for me ended up

bankrupt and everything and it's only

then when I look to the judicial system

I thought no this is wrong it's

disgusting what they're doing when I

left the job yeah I need a revenue I

need a waffle remedy

oh hi Russ we'll start go to court how

naive could you be as I then started to

land but when we're actually looking at

the system just now many many people

don't understand what's going on so this

is what we're going to try explain today

as I said just now the common law court

is something it's been set up what we

will explain to you this now within the

existing system if you look at the court

system in any country the judicial

system in the UK you can go back

hundreds of years right we have one

system in this country for justice many

other countries have a similar system

right it's controlled by the state the

government has Oregon the Kate the

climate at one point this is what's

happened in the UK now recently because

the work that many people have been

doing in relation to Commonwealth Court

we've actually had judges in the courts

in this country have admitted that we

currently have two judicial systems

operating the statutory system which is

controlled by the government and we have

the common law court system

which is run by the people which is

yourselves so what i'm going to do is

we're going to explain roughly how this

works how its set up and introduce you

to so common law now I'm calling common

law it's not common law is because of

the english-speaking population

worldwide they seem to relate justice

with common law principles inherit bow

flights this is what people accept so

it's it's terminology is quite good

I apologize just now because I'm not

very PC I don't give us stuff as a real

estate what I'm going to do is I'll just

speak as I see fit and that's a so

hopefully says whether I get an

invitation barn age here's a different

thing what we're going to do just now is

point to some of the flaws what's

happening with them the system just to

let you know now the one thing we're

going to see is look common-law could

also be called natural law it's also the

law of the land right in relation to

obviously sees the logo that you have at

the bottom of the logo it says villages

Commonwealth Court visibly just they

used Latin terms why not use one as well

this lis giuse means the law of the land

right it takes away from their maritime

law and it puts the control back to the

people the authority right now when we

do this we set up we're going to

highlight the difference now between

living men infections you may or may not

know about this and again I'm aware that

it's going out live as well but what

you've got to remember although it's

called common law it is applicable to

everyone believe it or not being from

Scotland slightly different in Scotland

because we had something called the

Declaration of Arbroath they determine

that if you're born in Scotland you're

born sovereign yeah it's fine no no no

no whatever you're born your sovereign

this mark were you born Rhys read color

red creed color religion anything

doesn't matter it's only after you're

born someone then grabs you in teaching

to the system when you're in the system

that

right this is in Scotland the tent argh

you see no no no was so sovereign that's

fighting that they argue the probable

estate grab yeah um so what we're going

to do is explain the difference

realistically at this moment in time I

would say there's a large majority of

people here don't exist on the common

law and now you say well how can I not

exist on here I'm saying yeah I can see

people seeing sitting yep it's not a

problem if you take an individual here

plump anyone just choose someone I take

the name of that individual you go up

the road five males and silver you have

you held of this person this individual

no is there any record of them under

common law no can you identify this name

this individual yes how the statutory

system council tax as voters rule poor

air anything Bank calves National

Insurance numbers everything you're in

this statutory system that's it this is

created above now how it works is your

parents this is a clever bet your

parents art buff were told to register

above right that's the way it works they

don't have to but what all the hardy so

the register you both know what they do

the government the state create a legal

fiction the legal fiction of the create

is the name that's on your bank card

it's on your driving license on your

passport it's on anything that you deal

with the government they don't deal with

you as an individual or living man or a

woman the only deal with affection the

legal table that's it now what they do

is a long story we don't have enough

time to go through all this but you can

check it out they make money with

affection by using the fiction no if you

think about it the first one the first

video was short it says it questioned

the rules changed the rules but

literally this is what is if you think

about what's available just now and

think about the people are suffering you

think about things yourself and say no

if it's acceptable fine stay with the

system if it's not acceptable you change

it no when you change it just now if you

think about it first of all if you've

done release right and I want to do

something with us want to defend myself

how do we do that what I'm going to do

just now is click on this one the next

slide here it gives you three major

declarations the declarations the first

one over that far right is 1215 many me

know that that was the Magna Carta

now the Magna Carta was one of the

founding documents they used waddled

wait to set up the system with its

judicial system to set up the way that

operated the way they conduct themselves

to stayed with the men and women so

that's fine a lot of countries

throughout the world have used this as a

funding document they still use it to

this day it can never ever be altered

never from 1215 it stands what happened

after that there was one of two

amendments and the government was then

created in this country when they

created the government the government

started to change but they didn't change

the first one the can't they changed the

additional ones and they see to you that

the Magna Carta is not applicable crap

this is still a part of all this there

you have rights but the government of

hiddenness from yeah the next ones 1324

the Scots in the audience I don't know

if there's any 1520 the Declaration of

Arbroath literally speaking in simple

terms if you if you've seen the phone

Braveheart

Edward King ed well then what will

Edward Longshanks was fighting with the

Scots

came up to Scotland those battles for a

number of years and Robert the Bruce

when the English won the last battle

this is what we need to protect

ourselves so the Tang the authority on

elf was the poor so Robert the Bruce and

various noblemen in Scotland prepared

the Declaration of Arbroath literally

literally speaking what it says is look

in Scotland when we are born were born

sovereign that said we will never ever

come under

the rule of the English because of the

English obviously because of Edward

Longshanks and the tannin who says as

long as 100 us remain alive to this day

we will never be brought under English

rule right now that's significant

because from that is it's actually been

except to know what you've got to think

about if you go back to the Church of a

time the Pope they've accepted this

document what they actually do is within

this clause they've come up and says

look if 100 people stand together you

can bring down governments you can take

on countries all you need is 100 people

now the church accepted that the UK

government of his sector have accepted

that Nicholas Stubbs and in Scotland

still goes on a bit less this is a

shit-tons when he says look we're

sovereign in Scotland you will not pass

this in the English bar read you cannot

do this well solve them so the English

in the tongue receive a walkie find your

sovereign will go back up to Scotland

you go to the Scottish Parliament and

Nicholas in Nicholas Allen says right

okay this is what we're doing yeah but

was sovereign Abbott does MA

this is where government it's different

it's different than England they use it

to sue themselves but as I said just now

the 100 figure is significant

after that issues we've got 1776 where's

the Declaration of Independence

America which is fine now again as

everyone knows the stole uses to snow

it's a founding document there that was

based a lot on the Declaration of

Arbroath it's a bit also took in aspects

of the Magna Carta so all these

documents are get it unfortunately they

have one thing in common which I'm not

overly fast with is that when they were

created they were created with normal

cases but also they were created with

the clown or with the establishment

governments like which is fine it did

affect the people the people did benefit

but the government does so on there so

they were actually writing the laws and

the documents but the world or good

documents are all applicable and we

still use them today great but we'll go

on

father later on when we do that we'll go

back slowly just I'm going to play a

video just now to explain the

significance of the Magna Carta snow so

I'm going to point out judge the snow if

you just listen carefully to what you

have to say okay one clause that people

always forget is clause 61 and it's from

this that we take the very vivid

principle that nobody is above the law

no King King anointed God's servant

inherits by divine luck you could call

it but right now every King in medieval

Europe made an oath that he'd be a good

King do lots of justice look after lots

of poor people all the sort of things

that you'd want your new king to do but

in medieval Europe if the King didn't

ants didn't provide justice and so on

and so forth I'm afraid they took the

view that he had to answer to God in

heaven

well when the King's dead it's not much

good if you've had no justice or you're

not been properly looked after and what

Magna Carta did was to say in clause 61

if the King does not abide by the

Charter when he's notified that he is in

breach of it in effect a Council of

twenty-five barons can take over the

running of the kingdom they're not to

harm him they're not to injure him

they're not of course to treat him with

violence or his family but they're no

longer stuck with their oath of

allegiance and fealty this I think is a

fantastically important moment suddenly

the king is answerable on earth not just

in heaven interesting Magna Carta still

applicable you have here a High Court

judge explaining the use of article 61

at all 61 was actually invoked in 2001

technically twenty-five barons

had tumblin and says look this is

ridiculous in relation what the

government are doing what the Queen's

doing the committing treason against the

people and it says this is unacceptable

so they but these bar

invoke article 61 now having done that

as as many people stood behind them and

again they've submitted oath to the

balance to see the stand with him that's

fine but what we've actually found out

is the government and especially the

judicial system don't give us stuff

they're not interested simply because if

you put in an orphan see you stand under

article six day one couldn't care less

because they see the article 61 and

magna carta has been altered because

they've introduced art religious

legislation nor the haven't but of

course these idiots they sit in these

courts and make the decisions they are

not held accountable and they're getting

our we will literally model but this is

what's happened by again article 61 is

relevant Magna Carta was relevant

Declaration of Arbroath and the

Declaration of Independence these are

significant documents but because it

doesn't fit with their requirements they

ignore them this is where the common law

court comes into its own we speak about

the the difference between we go back to

the faction now we speak to the

difference between men and women and

obviously as they're living in the

faction now when your birth certificate

was created

your parents had were told to register

above the clear estate create defection

and they continued using that the

difference here is according to their

laws and we'd seen laws they're not laws

the rules because that cooperations

all these people Isis whether it's

courts whether it's the Queen anyone now

again as I'm not religious as I'm not at

all as it says it doesn't really bother

me one way law people are entitled to

choose wherever they want religion faith

race color as is sovereignty says

royalty doesn't make any difference as

that's fine so we're not here we're

dealing with from all over the world men

and women right everyone has a right to

choose but the state are using rules

against the people so with the creation

of the buff certificate what they're

doing is you're right I've got here so

basically when you go hypothetically you

go into their courts to defend

yourself you're charged for some reason

you go in it says you work in there

they've attached affection now to

compensate a lot the people who have

been involved with us has been gone now

technically the first common law court

was convened on the 11th of June and it

was two years ago so next month we'll

have had two years during that time

we've held a think 11 different court

hearings with dealt with 28 different

cases and we've dealt with over 200

people during that so we are convening

courts is making a difference and

there's a lot going on but many many

people don't understand what is

happening however if we go back slightly

when you look at their system if you're

going to defend yourself I've been in

court myself so when you go and you

stand then I said look I have inherent

buff lights I'm a sovereign so we stand

there don't like loyals the enmity of

what happened is I've run out of funds

the end of it anyway have lost

everything so I defend himself but for

I'm not using your system so I pointed

it to the judge in Scotland not called

sheriffs I said look I stand as a living

man under common law and he says right

ok fight and I said you will not do this

you can't do this is not really

understood I said no I'm standing I have

inherent rights not I'm not speaking to

you now what they tend to do is see I

can't hear you

it's not because they're deaf bother

maybe it says but it's because they're

not allowed to deal with you as a living

man and flesh and blood they have no

authority over you they can't deal with

you they can only deal with the fiction

the legal title so the legal title we

deal with is the fiction that was

created by the government this is where

it becomes interesting so we've got two

things here first of all if you go into

their Court they will not accept you as

a man so how do you obtain justice you

can't so it's like one follow something

wrong there the next thing is the

fiction how do you come and say that for

not doesn't work so what we do is return

race you're right they use the boss'll

difficut they're using that they are now

I have individuals who

was spoken recently says we'll go into a

little bit more over there in about 10

minutes or so we're going techies but

what we do is through the use of the

fiction and obviously this is their

they'll buff for the living manner for

the living mine are women we can

actually confirm our standing in the

courts

they have no way that they can attack

individuals if you take away that

control that authority the jurisdiction

and their consent

this can be done here so I'm with the

common-law corpomax it done this we

decided what we're going to do is set up

the first and the world of its kind is

effectively a database for all living

men and women like now in in relation to

obviously ski countries and worldwide we

actually have 57 countries with people

who have registered recorded on

information so they've submitted

declarations in 57 countries now the

terminology we'll use which is another

another thing we'll discuss when you

stand as a living man or a woman in

their legal system they use what they

call legalese it's exactly the same

words but with a different meaning now

if you think no it doesn't sound like so

well hold on what do you do is you have

a standard world right

so basically sit standard rod-like

understand when they please speak to you

they ask you those really really a

charge of extreme ways of stopping you

or why they want to speak to you the

first thing it says do you understand

right now understand effectively do you

comply are you we love I'm saying

understand ah simple English right

understand in legalese means do you

stand under my authority so of course

you're not knowing this yes but you've

given away consent so you'll know under

their authority they can then prosecute

you charge you do to everyone now

there's an interesting thing which I

mentioned today about money the police

here those difference between police

officers and police constables

right police constables are basically

they have to uphold the law of the land

might cause no harm loss of injury

that's it

which of the peace deal without mother

Sheila screams anything else which

relates the Acts of Parliament is

statutory legislation but that only is

applicable to the fiction the fiction is

created by the government but what they

do is they toggle on to you what we're

going to do is we'll show the next slide

here this one in relation the documents

this felt of January this year it's a

new document that was created to go

along with the previous three this

documents a one-page document of the

topic it is the declaration for the

common law court so basically it says

the we are living men and women we stand

together we will not accept statutory

rule we will not be bound for it bombed

by it and also if someone tries to

enforce it they will be committing a

claim against a living men and women and

will be held accountable for I there is

the phrase which we taken from the

Declaration of Arbroath which basically

says look as long as 100 of us stand

together we will not be held under

statutory rule so therefore they cannot

apply statutory legislation to you if

you come out with now we'll go back to

the police it's the same of the

government's as well the user I think

when those feeling and the president

America at ariza made of the same here

they're always speaking about having the

consent of the people we please by

consent so basically says we please by

consent as find if the police come up to

see you and you don't want to speak to

them you don't consent they have no

authority so that's the way it works

now the declaration is the first thing

we actually have this document he verses

so we'll put this information into the

system just to explain that we have

living men and women and because the

figure of 100 was significant we've

taken 100 signatures a sample of the men

and woman says who stand with the common

law co-op now I was at court hearing

recently because they tried to close

them in the common

co-op long story I'm not allowed to see

too much but I was in court but part of

the healing very cleverly a-tumblin and

I went a tenth of your witness and they

procure a fiscal who is the equivalent

of the CPS said no no you can't ask him

to read that because I have this

document it's a first page which is the

Declaration sizes can you read this

they said no no no he is not allowed to

read that is why not they said well you

can ask him questions you can't ask him

to read I thought sorry so we took the

document back from them event took a

bargain says right okay right I'd like

you to pay attention please

I'm now going to read something to you

and I'm going to ask you a question so I

actually read of the Declaration for the

common law court in their statutory

Court and I meet sure that we recorded

an audio as well so they have that in

their a copy of this document went into

the court as well which challenged that

authority in jurisdiction so we're

starting node to build up the picture

and clean this Eden you can actually

take them on in their own system now

when we do that is we've set this we've

established the position from we've done

that if it's full all this click on the

next one sorry yeah right the difference

here from were using the two courts as

having established the system it's

simple you think it's the same it's not

we have a distinction now between a

living man or woman and a legal fiction

right so what we're going to do is look

at the two worlds here like you have a

legal system and a lawful system the

legal system is for the statutory there

the statutory system the fiction the

legal entity a waffle is for the living

men and women the flesh and blood right

so when we look at the legal system the

legal system is based on acts of

parliament mostly made by corrupt

politicians obviously she's being bribed

by lobbyists they set up within the

system statutory obligations now they're

not laws the not rules the law talks a

parliament there are actually just

obligations that's always with us seeing

that you have to comply the next one you

are fourth Air Force compliance is

actually unlawful they can't do that now

anything under common law and natural

law they cannot force you to do

something they just can't do no one else

has a right to force anyone else to do

anything but this is what the government

are doing they're not giving you a

choice they don't tell you the force you

to accept the law they say that's it

now this is actually without consent

they're not allowed to enforce oh it is

unlawful they deals with fiction no the

fiction could be corporations

legal entities statutes codes and

policies right we've covered things like

legal entities legal entity is a legal

fiction it's also cooperation so the

fact that they have they give you a name

my legal cooperation is mr. John Smith I

can see that because I own it it's

clever but we'll explain how we design a

minute I own my legal fiction but the

legal fiction is based on the statutory

bustle again which the government

control so this is how we do it the

language they use is legalese it sounds

like English it has different meanings I

assured you that were the world

understood understand it's completely

different now if you go into court for

the first time you have to defend

yourself the courts in this country in

fact throughout the world they're not

there for justice

be in no doubts whatsoever it's got

nothing to do with justice every so

often you get out result

it says someone will get that but

overall if you look at the system as a

complete package you will not get

justice the court system are

corporations the run for profit the

police or cooperations run for profit

the government the Queen everyone

they're all cooperations is in are can

be courses you can check that those are

companies in America is done in Bradley

they basically do a credit check and all

the companies were alright if you go to

the name Bradstreet tank on the

information they're all companies

corporations this is the way they work

he says you don't get the MPS are even

polity or even cooperations this is how

they deceive people you're not dealing

with men and women here this is their

system now to break their legislation

it's an infraction of a policy that's

always it's not a law it cannot be a law

it's a rule it's like Tesco supermarket

if you break one of the rules also what

gives us stuff it's exactly same as M

Tesco sent you a letter C and right I'm

sorry says there's a parking offense

you're speeding or there's a parking

offence on this day in our car park

we're not happy what someone's in need

to appeal a court you have to come to

their premises it's not going to find

you if you get someone's like out but

you're going to see them sort off pay to

see with the courts it's exactly the

same it says it's a place of business

it's a registered company the trade for

profit it's not for justice you do not

get justice in the courts here right

it's not set off for that and this

treats you as a corporate person person

is a legal fiction right and many people

think we'll are you a person yes I'm a

person or a person is a legal entity a

person is the name on your driving

license it's a name on your passport

it's a name on your bank card that is it

the legal fiction that as the person

when the rules are not adhered to

essentially all it is is a breach of

contract it's a contract that's what

they do they say be there since laws

which is not the case it has no force on

law without your consent but they trick

you into giving consent when the police

say to you do you understand what I'm

saying you see yes you're standing under

their authority but they're actually

using legalese the same ones with

different definitions there was a guy I

learned a lot from a guy who's no longer

with us and he was mention earlier or

mentioned I can't join Harless it says

he's no longer with us but the guy who

was broken or him saying I learned a lot

from him he's been the point is they

used this system and one of the things

he did say

which stuck with me you have the English

Oxford Dictionary of English words on

there they add a few but they did

detection is there so it's fine why

would you need a legal dictionary if

you've already got locks on one English

dictionary why do you have the legal one

not only that why does it change every

couple of years it's the same words but

they keep changing the meanings you

don't know about that but this is what

they do this seeks to profit in control

now if you look at the law say the

waffle this is for the living man and

woman the flesh-and-blood one first of

all you deal with common law common law

it's also called natural law and also

law of the land it's a law of tradition

which been established by precedent as

fact over the years the law of day is

common to all and now it doesn't matter

whether you are the king the Queen Isis

or a lowly peasant it doesn't matter

it's applicable everyone which is

crucial

it can only be determined by due process

of law which is a trial by a jury it

deals with facts which is basically

living beings and truth we don't deal

with fictions it's with or living men

and women the language we use is English

just plain English no hidden meanings

again that can be no claim without a

ninja Barbie so when they prosecute you

for really statutory offences they're

doing that to make money you haven't

harmed anyone

but the child had no interest and the

thing which has changed it or I was

actually watching the television a

switch store in the morning just to try

and catch bits and pieces there was a

news feature on there was two things

first of all someone got charged for

walking down the street in London he was

attacked by the police jumped on and

says right here will issue a ticket the

phandom 90-pound I thought I okay fine

his crane was hating his face he was

working the scene now what they're doing

is within the system no they've set up

CCTV and it's face recognition so what

they're doing knows when you walk down

the street they want to see who's

walking where they've got you there

now the feast recognition was set up but

this guy he had seen the camera had a

jock on so he pulled up like his scarf

up these noise so when that happened the

police not all that jumped the Misses

right okay so he said look what you're

doing is you're not fun with me it's not

already can't do that

your uncle you're covering up your face

he's no you're not filming me you should

know it's an offence here we're finding

in the give my nine tip on ticket namely

upon ticket for covering up your face

this is disgusting the passing

legislation which they say are laws or

not the rules and you're forced to

comply that's crap they can't do that

this is so if you think it actually gets

better than that but we'll move on says

in this system here as is the the they

treat you as a mine out of women which

is fine you're not affection and again

common-law it's lawful when a if those

harm caused to another the laws broken

right no the principles of law which is

common law and natural law God's all off

you want anything right I said the law

of the land it's beastly cause no harm

causing caused no loss and cause no

injury in your contractual dealings

ensure your honorable that's it there's

nothing else that is natural law no it

doesn't matter we're not religious or

anything but I'm going to go on about

abate air about about it and also since

when you look at the various aspects

this is like it's tens down this is

whether you're a believer there is a

creator if you believe that you could be

it doesn't matter which religion you

obviously believe in that's fine

everyone's entitled opinions but

basically it says the laws that come

down through the years through the

centuries and obviously through

believable in the theater they follow

natural law principles which is fine

that is law everything else of on that

is man-made its government its statutory

it's not law it's a rules and

regulations you do not have to comply

right

in common law if you're looking at a

lawful issues in relation to men and

women it is lawful it has the full force

of law actually cause harm loss or

injury someone and also it says common

law actually see looks to see justice

for the individuals concerned they don't

look to line the state's pockets and

obviously a reward people for fat cut

pensions and things like that now quote

we've done to go back to this

certificate thing this here is a common

law birth certificate no this wasn't

this was actually quite good it was a

female link where I'm not going the NEMA

but the state you started to rules to do

various things one of which sorry oh

yeah it's okay what this need do in

relation to various things one of the

issues the deal with these children so

gone all about bone more that and more

about this later on in relation to

children what the statutory system do

not trying to remove them so what we've

says is look if we're going to defend

ourselves we should have a bustle to

forget no what we do is we allow people

the common law court is not a company

it's not a business it's not one

individual the Commonwealth Court is the

people it's you so it says it's not

cooperation we've actually been spoken

to by one or two people and says look we

can actually set this up and effectively

have a cooperation and we can charge

them we can do this on well no it's not

like that

this is about justice nothing else no

money involved is just this that's it

now basically what we do is we spoke to

people about obviously setting something

up but up like this and this says we

need something on common law so what we

have is we have a bus a perfectly set up

so we have a website no the website is

there basically to record information

that's it so when you convene a common

law court i convene I happened it can be

in the first common law court I done so

because I was looking to obtain a lawful

remedy which was deprived within the

statutory system now you tell me say

well how can you do

of course you can if for something if

you require a lawful remedy you use

what's available the statutory system if

you cannot obtain it you have a choice

to do it yourself you can go back

thousands of years back to the Greeks

and obviously come through to pleasant

thing you have a right to convene a

court hundreds eight years ago in this

country used to sell small courts and

villages it says your local community

with Enoch and Enoch or if your neighbor

had pinched some cattle from you or a

horse or something if there was a

problem you go to the community look I

need a court because this guy has stolen

from me I want them prosecuted she would

convene a court set up from the

community nor fischels the community

would get together have a duty there and

you would hear both parties they were

there an issue about like that's the way

I work it's a symbol that's always no

involvement with the state not about

money it's a big justice now in doing

this they are targeting people through

the bus certificate so under common law

we need to confirm that people exist so

we said right what we'll do as well a

lot of people to record information on

the site then they were born so you can

actually go into the site and see little

key I'll go under the Buffs certificate

section and say look I was born I was

born on this date this is my name this

is my appearance now this information it

says nothing happens with it it's a

declaration I'm seeing record the

information forget the English forget

the legalese terminology I'm not I don't

give to stuff sort of registration and

things like I look you're not giving

anything away it's common law you're

making a declaration you exist that's it

so if you confirm that you exist you're

making a declaration but common law so

if for some reason you have to defend

yourself in the statutory system you can

now confirm that you're a living man or

woman which is fine now the bus

certificate when we do that this is that

is a reference number issued this is for

their the entry and when we get that one

of the models that come back and says

we'll look why would like a certificate

it was for a child to protect the child

from the state we didn't do that we

spoke to various people so they will we

do

yes or would we do that so anything you

register on court or the Cleveland Court

submit you can actually obtain a

certificate for our so you hear about

through the court and again it's done at

course plates but the interesting thing

about this is you look at the bottom of

the document self the three-page

document of the cover page they are

obviously says you ever had this above

the cover the cover page and then on

that you've got the birth details so it

gives you the near buff of the child

birth name of the child there of birth

place of birth time above and so on but

you'll see they bombed it's actually

stamped and embossed by the court seal

this gives you the authority of the

people this has been issued through the

people it's recorded and it's obviously

confirming your stance as a living man

or woman now by doing this and allows

you then to protect yourself from their

course now when we do that we've set up

various documents and again we'll

explain a lot about the city of fiction

later on which I have covered a couple

of things but what I'm going to do is

while discussing Authority so what I'll

do is I'm going to on to the next

slide no it's like everything else I'm

going to tell you a story about

something just know first of all we're

going to look at they were sorry that

was caught and that's a common law card

sorry

who was after the birth certificate it's

part of the process with certificates

many people of tamron it says look the

certificate sorry for when we're

actually out with these certificates

we're not going to carry them about with

us if you run into some of the

authorities or the police or someone we

need something honest so again it was a

guide down a nail operation Luke and

we're not get something else smaller so

we decide to come up with cards

now we've came up with cars - now is

there's a couple of variations are there

we've used ten inches as red in yellow

as red is a common law court for Great

Britain and although there's a Union

Jack layer when you record the country

are born then you get the flag for that

country so whether it's England Scotland

I on the wheels the international it

gives you the Frog for your country of

birth and it's a yellow card and it's

headed International Criminal Court so

that's the difference in so you know

house which I was seeing you now have an

internationally recognized

them for recording living men and women

no nobody else tosses right by doing

that in confirming your position you

can't do it no the things the things I'm

going to do they're on their the buff

card that says common war name

I look at the yellow one it's for a Jane

Smith look how it's written right now

again it's not an all capital letters

it's a common one name and she has an

entry which is BC who stands for birth

certificate seventeen is basically the

year that it was called it which would

be 2017 and she was number two the legal

fiction name is mrs. Jane Smith and it's

all in uppercase which is the legal

fiction that the government used its

affectionate tends to be in car all caps

and again beneath that F n stands for

fictitious name entry again seventeen

and number two so this this card

confirms this individual stands as a

living woman and not only that that she

owns defection she's applied for

ownership it gives you a date of birth

and then the categories she's recorded

with the common law court so go back to

the use of affection now the fiction

that they have it was created but

because they've created a if we use

their rules what they've done is

committed fraud right now you were

involved

your parents were involved and also the

state were involved

so therefore according to their rules

they say law rules contract law rules

calling their rules it's a contract

because it involves more than one

individual right so this is established

the next thing is according to their

rules for a contract to be valid there

has to be fool disclosure now as far as

them and sound I've never been told that

they created a fiction for me I

certainly have been told what I'll doing

with it

I presume that you're a same I presume

your parents weren't told either so

their fathers know full disclosure so

again according to their rules of DC law

the contracts void if the contracts void

they don't own the fiction they're using

it but they've created it fraudulently

and because they've created fortune way

do that becoming an offense so once you

establish your position as a living man

or woman and all these things these

entries you do in the st. there's no

cost less so you make a declaration they

confirm you exist after doing nine only

it once you've confirmed your standing

as all living man or woman you can then

apply for ownership of the fiction why

can you do that simple you can do that

because they've created a frozen well

which voids the contract and if it voids

the contract what and then does is it

leaves the fiction line about it's on

your passport the driving license so

therefore who should the rightful owner

be the individual that's attached to so

therefore you can apply for it you

haven't got it so you can apply on this

site make an application for ownership

of your legal fiction providing you

follow the details and you've confirmed

the above under common law you can

obtain ownership of the fiction now

having done that in court I confirm the

judge as a fact in law that I owned my

legal fiction I also told them that was

a living man and he had no authority of

jurisdiction over me but bearing in mind

these documents when tendon or when

challenged rebutted I did see it the

sheriff and the CPS of the time look I

own the legal fiction it's a fact in law

however you may not have seen the

documents so as a goodwill gesture I'm

quite happy to help out should you wish

to challenge this I'm quite happy for

you to do so do you wish to challenge it

because if you do the first thing you

have to do is explain to me how it was

created the to the Lord Lord that heads

through a speaker so I confirm that I'm

the owner of my legal fiction in their

courts and the documentation is in the

court records as a production they

cannot do anything about it so you take

control away from them right I'll move

on the next one sorry no I'm going to

move on somewhere well speaking of

authority of the courts and that I says

we'll move on slightly because I'm going

to change this now again if when you ask

these things

if you ask for my opinion is now I'm

quite happy with religion with politics

I think the system that we have and this

country and throughout the world I think

is great I think that the system we have

the structure we have is great growing

out of it it's been developed for

centuries by we have one problem the

tracks the run the system are all

corrupt right now

as obviously excuse my language these

guys the wrongness system is so corrupt

is unbelievable

I don't really manga asses of corrupt

when they're attacking people in

harming people that is disgusting it

should not be allowed and they should be

held accountable and on in relation a

lot of your friend I just like quick

though just a curiosity if I know I'll

ask you the question about these people

are not held accountable in their own

system but obviously they should be now

I don't mind this system it's wonderful

it's just not running correctly no it's

the same with if you've got any views on

religion politics the royal family I

think you're all family agree not a

problem

I don't mind it if the people choose to

have a royal family that allows do as I

haven't got a problem with that

what I object to is if you have a royal

family the amount of money they get is

disgusting when people cannot feed the

children cannot heat the homes the

system is crashing people are losing

houses that being attacked in the royal

family along with these and

Parliament it says have disgusting sums

of money and people are suffering

these are some of the things that were

know trying to dress the Yukon walk or

but I'm going to do just now as I'm

going to mention something here no it's

it's going back but we're going on a

bath Ora tea here now I'm going to

mention something give me or may not

know about this and it goes back to

biblical times now I'm not religious but

what you've got to remember is we're

speaking about the royal family here I

was speaking with tradition now years

centuries ago it came back from Jacob in

the Bible right now what had happened

the long and short of it is Jacob hakima

we had an angry his brother decided to

go off in the wilderness when I went up

into a mountain wet lessly be rested his

head on a rock a stone that stone is

called Jacob's Pillow it's had two or

three different names it's now called

the Stone of Destiny but what happened

is during the evening he supposedly

went up and I hear a theory and spoke to

God Christ now he spoke about how to

develop and what's going to do and go

ahead and have various tribes and

obviously go out into the world now to

do that he says he was going to crown

appointed people so what they were going

is take this stone the Jacob's Pillow

ticket and the people the sovereign

people the Kings the queens would be a

known anointed in sworn on beside the

story so effectively effectively

effectively this was God's witness right

so anytime through tradition when

someone is coming the king or a queen

this is the stone is God's witness

without the stone you're not the king of

Queen is not valid no what happened

heald's accepted practice so we said

that any coronation what requires to be

witnessed by God now I'm speaking just

now Abbey the British sovereignty right

because what happened is through the

centuries

Jacob came away went on these ancestors

they moved across Europe and then what

happened is it ended up in Ireland so

then came over to Scotland and it was

held at the school of Palace the power

of school and we stayed there and every

king and queen that was anointed

actually sought above the stone of

destiny to be client so that was God's

witness

so therefore became lawful it was

accepted practice that was it

now unfortunately which I mentioned

before we had Edward Longshanks who came

on to Scotland and they say they'd saw

this we're going to take over but

because of the Stone of Destiny he says

I'm having lot see together the winner

we took it back many had a TOEFL made so

he took one of Destiny and put it that

so done that sorting the throne and then

through the point kings and queens in

ever since then that's been the case

okay so in the context the united

kingdom's god witness which have already

said wasn't jacob student which is also

known as the Stone of Destiny the Stone

of Destiny however before the current

coronation and it was actually replaced

by a fig now in 1920 or 1930 and then he

thought there was some Scots and decided

they were going to get this stone back

because think we should pinch them so

they said well wouldn't have it but they

didn't actually quite come off I said

for various reasons it didn't come off

but what had happened is the guy who had

actually made up a sample stone seem to

mention same size same where I gathered

a dry run they test out they said right

this is what we're gonna do his life

there so there's a student a university

student I have those three or four

people that were from before people had

went down they decide that all going for

the Clare they like the Stone of Destiny

which was hosting Westminster and they

would take a bottle of d50

so the went down pop and it was supposed

to have religious significance as well

but they ticket on Christmas Day now

they actually took this stone they broke

it they actually come up to Scotland

with it and it's hidden a few months

later because of what was happening the

world cracking up they didn't like it so

he says we'll have to give me stuff I'll

do something but they give him the fake

stone so they do the fixed oh and put it

in our broth RB which is where the

declaration for Scotland's made the

declaration

of our broth they put this stone of

destiny they are covered in a salt they

across and flag left that they aren't

all the authorities

so the thought these come and says yes

we've got the stone so they took it back

to London when they took it back the

realize there was a problem it's not the

same stone now thus distinctions of

which I'll go on about just now but

Beasley in these circumstances if they

do not have this stone right which they

don't the core nation is was conducted

but not in the presence of God there was

not witnessed now according to their

rules not our rules according to their

rules for a coronation to be valid it

has to be witnessed by God it wasn't

byxis stone wasn't there now accordingly

the Queen has never actually been sworn

in probably now or explain all about the

word Bible s but the Queen knew this and

she went ahead and deceived the people

but she's never affect over been sworn

in the Queen since she's not volatile a

harmonic all our acting's including our

appointment of the presiding judges and

sheriffs are invalid no think of it less

implication the Bar Association which is

mentioned just now is what all right the

Bar Association is signed off and

approved by the Queen the half-heart

consent if the queen is not the Queen

avoids everything that's a legal system

in a large chunk of the world they have

no authority right now that freaks me

out a for were far above a women'll hold

on C challenged their authority and says

no that's not right surely if there's a

store near which is we should find it

whether it's genuine or not so they've

been various people have done things

about that this here is a picture of the

Stone of Destiny on the right you'll see

this throne it was made and this throne

said the Stone of Destiny slots and

under right now

it basically says the Stone of Destiny

currently residing in Edinburgh Castle

is known approvable fake now if you look

at the right hand side it's a real Stone

of Destiny based made our porphyry stone

the wheat is 458 pounds that's a real

stone now that petrol is taken from the

government is taken from the palace that

was pre-1950 I think goes back to

nineteen twenty or thirty that is

official information that came from the

comb so the stone gets nicked in

nineteen fifty and then they get back a

couple monthly uh what you have now is a

fig stone slightly different in color

it's the fig stone is meat of Scottish

sandstone now the people that stuck the

neck distorted and what finger we still

were there they had presumed that the

stone was created and came from Scotland

this school there's a quarry urban

school which obviously gives his son

stone so the individual making the tech

the fake one made of the fake stone took

that made up they're not realizing that

the stone originally came from Bethel

earth thousands of years ago and it was

made of a hard rock granite type

material so therefore when the fake

stone was made it was actually made it's

slightly different it looks different

but also only weighs 336 pounds so by my

account is dropped 122 pounds in his

face of a couple of months when it was

net now simply by looking and examining

the Stone of Destiny you can establish

whether or not it's fake right it says

if it's fake the queen is not your valid

Queen the thing she sailed off

the things that she's saying often are

not valid and that then as it puts a

huge question mark into the control that

they have the authority the judicial

system

everything's are void if that's the case

everything has to go back to 1953 now

what we did is I convene the common law

court recently it was in Middlesbrough

and then one of the issues I put before

the court as I said look I require the

Stone of Destiny to be examined to

establish once and for all that they

have power are they do not I'm not

really bothered either way by needed

proven so therefore the stone exists and

therefore I would like to examine so I

put before that Judy the Julie passed

our well back this is yes we'll allow it

so we've got that soft put the people

walk in just know the Alvin all I think

is three months to comply with it so

wait but on that point just now just by

a show of hands I'm not questioning the

validity of obviously are all farm where

anyone else or the structure of the

system but the point is if this is a

system here and it's used to crown not

kings and queens we can still have kings

or queens it's not a problem but Beasley

we need to establish if we have a lawful

Queen on the throne so if that's the

case and we already have a court order

do you believe with a show of hands they

should be checked for authenticity

yes yeah yeah I mean I'm we're about

fifty fifty percent fifty percent

but yeah another correlation people can

do that one there's not a problem but

the point is there is an issue so I'm

going to do is I'm going to show you

something just now right watch is if you

ever listen to this carefully this is

from a BBC

on the 2nd of June 1953 the 27 year old

Princess Elizabeth became Queen in a

glittering pageant dating back almost a

thousand years now this holiest of

rituals concealed the unholiest of rails

in the House of Windsor leading up to

the coronation television was in its

infancy this new medium had never been a

factor in previous coronations would it

be welcomed or rejected by the Royals in

the early days of post-war television we

used to televise any royal occasion that

we possibly could and so when the

coronation that that was clearly going

to be the most wonderful occasion all if

we could get permission to televise it

but it was the queen who had to be

persuaded the Queen I believe wasn't

very keen on having it televised because

it was a very sort of is a religious

okay a service you know the BBC request

was refused by the Duke of Norfolk the

coronation committee and the cabinet

there was a good deal of apprehension

and almost a blank refusal it just went

on week after week every time they said

no we tried to find a reason why they

should have said yes what happened was

that the BBC leaked the fact that this

cabal of the establishment had decided

not to televise and then there was a

media storm

I'm afraid we did adopt a bit of spin

because if ever we could leak any

information that we thought was in our

favor then we try and get it into the

press and hoping that the government and

the palace would read it and we had a a

very good friend and George Campion

because every time we got to know he'd

come out with a great big article saying

it seems that they're not going to allow

television in the Abbey in their short

the spin had worked in a public opinion

poll seventy eight percent voted in

favor of televised in the day and

eventually a telephone call came yes you

have permission and from that moment on

it was wonderful television would give

unprecedented live access to the

ceremony any mistakes would be witnessed

by millions

the mystery of the monarchy had never

been so exposed this here is actually

relevant because basically what happened

at the coronation TV started off the BBC

had wanted to view and recalled the

coronation and what had happened is they

were told quite clearly No

now one thing appointed is now when the

cream is socially accound

Jeff Lester snow the deeds and what had

happened is King George had passed away

in February 1952 the Queen was actually

cloned the coronation in June 1953 this

was like 16 month later the reason it

took so long is because the nor she

would not be a valid Queen so they held

off trying to get the Stone of Destiny

and when they couldn't get a bath they

decided to use the fake one so she's

knowingly lied to the public right I'm

going to roll through a few things just

now just to show you office Lea if what

we're doing to highlight some of other

issues we deal with sorry

livingston sheriff caught the reason I'm

doing this in Scotland he said there's a

sheriff can lock there just on the issue

of the fiction and the lit the man

delivering mine an individual who have

known for a while had went to court to

confirm his dealing with a housing issue

went before said of Ken Locke who have

dealt wood before and the clerk of the

court says the individual are you mr.

David no can you identify yourself to

which he replied I'm David parson he

said no are you mr. David parson he said

no that's affection no the judge jumped

and the sheriff and says no I said you

need to identify yourself are you David

mr. David parson he said no what's the

name in your muscle turf cases it

doesn't matter

it's affection he said no I'm going to

ask you once again you will this is

confirmed if you're mr. David parson the

fiction he wanted a fiction right

she says you will confirm that if not

all arrest you sister Melissa go why he

says well from non-appearance any

standards speaking them now we started

speeding the guy this is a something

wrong somewhere it doesn't want which

it's like a Twilight Zone

the judicial system by beta simmer await

the deal with affection you're standing

having a conversation he says right you

don't accept affection right I'm issuing

a warrant for your arrest non-appearance

and he stand in front of them these

idiots any calls get away with doing

that that is a claim under common law

under statutory law and even the United

Nations legislation it's criminal

coercion the effectively taking

something when they used to be

previously and binding you the taking

abandon agency and right this is your

fiction bung you'll have it ok they

don't Blanche it but they give you a

legal fiction and they give you a buff

certificate number so you bonded slavery

was abolished this is I think which will

come back to the 1770 72 in England but

it was actually for the British Empire

was 1833 it's a bit person isn't they've

changed the all right now this one

here this is the these are the Scottish

courts and tribunals service directors

which is the legal system in Scotland

I'd actually went and seen some when I

was the regional point this out is in

the battle forth from the right as an

individual who's a senior court judge he

went to court and he was told Luke you

do not have consent it says the

authority to you were this you're paid

for by the Scottish court service no I'm

not

they said yes you are no I'm not I have

nothing to do with the Scottish court

service so we came away from court done

some results that's on their website

he's a company director so any court

he's part of himself nobody kills

couldn't care less but this is what they

do they're not held accountable and

property theft in relation to property

theft if you think about what we're

doing with a living mind and affection

by obviously recording affection what

the state of doing just now is removing

children as well right property as a

living minor woman when you have a child

this is a view is property that

terminology use it it's property and so

therefore the stare coming on and

removing property from you they have no

authority to do so they come in try not

in warrants to attach

to attach the child and remove them

think about their if the obtain a

warrant the warrant is for affection

right now the fictions attach to the

child but under common law because it's

child under 16 we've accepted their the

parent can claim the fiction so if you

recall your position as a living man or

woman you then obtain your infection

record your chels Buffum the common law

what you can then do is claim the

fiction of your child so effective wait

till they've become an adult you can

claim the fiction now if you have the

fiction how can they move a child

because the fiction is not attached to

the child baby they do but in doing so

the kidnapping children so we pointed

out to the judges they didn't like it

they say so these are some of the things

we'll actually deal with is your stove

but if you stand on common law you can

do that - same with Land Registry we've

got a situation here just now because of

the world weren't one world order for

you in Decorah governments are actually

is taking back property that obviously

asset stripping people 14e embarked the

repossessed properties throughout the

world is now is disgusting this is with

what they'll doing this is the system

allows to do it this is you can deal

with this under common law by confirming

your position now again reflect three

things the police as well the police's

world is now of way they're not all bad

well no they're not to be quite honest

the priests are actually trained when

they commented the job the trained in a

statutory system right they abide by

starter rules doctor what to do they do

not know a lot of these things they just

do for the told to do he says they have

jobs like everyone else however you do

get some covers like everyone else who

are corrupt who obviously like the

authority meet like people suffer this

idiot today the charged again ninety

palin this is for obviously not hiding

these are covering up his face so he

can't do that I said but some people

actually take joy in doing that now

assess people don't actually know asses

when they are on the job

it's the trained

put in here like this the monkey speak

no evil hear no evil see no evil it's

fine they're not aware of what's going

on no with the common law in Port well

actually passing on people will start

understand what's going on here that's

the same with your traffic wardens with

the common law court we have various

categories people now can record various

things one of the issues that we driving

is the fact that you have touched the

DVLA

in the UK and they penalize you for

everything but the point is they do it

because of the registered document so

what we do is under common law you can

register our ownership of your vehicle

through the common law court which takes

you away from a system now I'm going to

flick through four things here just now

it's applicable to everyone so first of

all you have catalonia this is in spain

they wanted independence obviously the

spanish down rain says no the you

statutory legislation against them you

have the yellow vests in france huge

thing has been going on for weeks

great for the daily however they're

taking on this statutory system the next

one breaks it now again i'm neither way

inclined i couldn't care less because i

don't like any of them i said you deal

with this now you are dealing with

politics you're dealing with parliament

you're the only European government

couldn't care less don't like them not

understood but the point is whichever we

are in claimed he says you can actually

deal with yourself because it is if you

take our way from the government I may

be simple I may be stupid if you employ

someone to represent you as an MP they

do what you tell them to do if they

don't do what they tell you get rid of

them why they're there you P&R regis get

rid of them and replace them the

politicians were told what to do they're

not listening get them away

sod off and again when you get rid of

them don't clear them off

on the last one which is relevant for

tomorrow is they Co 5d which is global

now in the last four of the things on

what I'm going to do just now the

implications for 5g surrenders all I'm

going to see it is summarized the snow

is all these layoffs a lot of things

that were coming up just know all the

issues right 5g you've got the the

yellow vests cattle or at cattle on

can't remember the last word basically

you've got these issues here they can be

resolved through common law if you take

the authority away from the government

right you can deal with these issues

right and cattle and they want

independence right that's fine they've

been prosecuted by statutory laws and

the Spanish government worktop they mean

culprits they were standing for this

independence the politicians and threw

him in jail but they only done out by

using starts real rules breaks it you're

on a mess to start with brexit because

of the statutory rules right it's same

with five G you've got five G and again

it's all under the statutory system so

you've got all these things if you stop

and say no hold on I'm a I'm a living

man I'm a loving woman I'm going to

stand here that's the end of it if you

stand under common law they cannot

enforce that through legislation convene

common law courts sign up you get what

you want return the authority to the

people which is what the common law

courts all about okay thank you

by your name

[Applause]

and who would ever believe that that was

John's first presentation a conference

[Applause]

[Music]

[Applause]

[Music]

[Music]

[Music]