Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
The police genre has always been considered by
critics a fascist genre, because there was always
the policeman who, in the end, was doing
justice by himself.
Not always, but this often happened.
So, I personally suffered from these criticisms, also
because I felt absolutely anti-fascist, so there
was no desire inside me to create such
a violent character who did justice by himself.
It came out because it was the story,
it was the stories of that time, the
stories requested, it was the characters.
Then, cinema always reflects a historical period, there's
nothing to do.
So, back then, there was this desire to...
Now, if I say to do justice, it's
a bit of a kick in the foot,
because back then maybe the critics were right,
but they weren't so right-wing, or maybe
they were, or maybe one of my colleagues
was very happy that they were.
I don't know.
In the police genre, the audience often found
a liberation.
It's like...
It's like in the film Argento, which then,
in the end, gets a bit down, being
afraid.
Now, apart from Liberi, Armati e Pericolosi, which
was, in fact, directed by Scerbanenco, Di Leo
was a fan of Scerbanenco, I remember, and
so this beautiful screenplay came out that they
proposed to me, and I immediately had this
feeling with Di Leo, and it was a
curious story, and it was an interesting story.
Above all, then, interpreted, rightly, because he set
his character on fire very well, by Thomas
Millian, and Eleonora Giorgi.
Fernando Di Leo was an excellent screenwriter, an
excellent screenwriter, certainly a good director.
He was, at the time, like all of
us of that generation, of that kind of
commercial cinema, but not in a denigratory sense.
He was not so much loved by critics
at the time, then he was revalued a
lot, except for one or two films.
But, humanly, he was undoubtedly a person of
value.
Do you
know what the result is of the games
of his good boys with plastic guns?
Four dead men.
But, but why didn't you stop them?
Why?
You had to stop them, the commissioner, I,
I had warned him, I had come on
purpose.
Now I want to know where they got
those weapons, who's behind them and what other
blows they made.
Thomas Millian, I remember when I interpelled Thomas
Millian to play the protagonist of this book,
Dangerous Weapons, you had to struggle a little
to make him come back to be that
Thomas Millian who had been very successful with
his face, his hair, his physiognomy.
What was it?
Because he was in a period in which
he loved to disguise himself a lot.
He came from Imonnetza, he came from other
films in which he really tried to hide,
now, without digging up the reasons why, but
I had some meetings with him and he
didn't want to, he was almost retarded, I
said, but no, how?
I remember we were at his house, he
had a beautiful house, a room full of
mirrors.
I remember I pulled his hair back and
I said, look, look how well you are,
I don't see why you shouldn't play this
character coming back to be that person who
is there, who has played many films.
So he accepted this thing and then he
felt very good, and I felt good too,
in fact Thomas is a splendid actor, he
was really an actor perhaps not even so
much recognized for his talent.
And in this book, Armati, Pericolosi, well, nothing,
the work went on smoothly, I must say
a lot, but very calmly and in the
end he was happy and I was happy
too.
Friends, colleagues, so when they found out I
was making the film with Thomas, they told
me, look Romolo who is a difficult person,
who is a rude actor, who is impatient,
who is nervous, you will feel bad, I
felt very good because immediately a relationship of
mutual esteem I remember once we had to
shoot a scene where there was a helicopter
that was rising and checking the escape of
the three boys and so on and there
was Thomas who stayed in the car all
day waiting for the weather to get better
to shoot his scene so I want to
say I remember these things and I have
a lot of sympathy.
Eleonora Giorgi was right for the role, it
was, it went well.
I think it was Diego's debut in cinema
maybe because I remember I was looking for
a character who did a small thing but
of character very precise, very focused and then
I met Diego.
Then a curious episode because once I was
dubbing a film at the Fono Roma and
I met Diego and he told me that
Romolo wait, take out a small picture a
first shot of him back then with a
big hair cough sorry curly and so on
and he said I always take it with
me because it brought me luck.
Yes, yes, he was very nice.
I don't remember exactly how much this dangerous
armed affected me but the critics didn't like
it because they were films that according to
some critics were too they tended to free
violence.
In dangerous armed books there was this kind
of violence but not free because it was
motivated by these three young people that in
the end maybe due to the lack of
ideals due to the lack of goals to
reach etc.
they let themselves go to this kind of
life obtaining then also a pleasure for the
free violence they did operate it but the
critics didn't like these things the audience yes,
much more and then there was also how
to say this search for actors that interpreted
these characters I remember that in the film
the three young killers that if I remember
well were Patrizzi were Max Delis and Benjamin
Lev I can tell an episode quite curious
about these three one of them one day
Benjamin Lev didn't appear on the set because
he had been the night before he had
been detained by the police because they suspected
they would have confirmed this I don't know
that there was a drug trafficking consumption certainly
and trafficking also so I found myself a
good part of the film with one less
actor and I had to counteract it nobody
ever noticed it's something I'm telling you for
the first time but then I don't see
why hide these things everything went well I
wish for him for Benjamin that now he
is calm that he is a paid gentleman
that has nothing to do with justice but
then there was this thing so I remember
the desperation we stopped only a few days
and then we started shooting again I counteracted
Benjamin I have to say very well then
I inserted him in the editing and nobody
noticed anything the films
I shot I don't remember well maybe in
7 weeks but then the films lasted a
maximum of 8 even there were productions that
claimed from certain films that were shot in
5 weeks I refused I never wanted to
have such short times
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.