Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Eugène Delacroix is one of the great romantic painters an artist who wrestled with the
revolutionary politics of 19th century France who added an exotic Oriental dimension to European art
and who inspired a late flourish in history painting whilst playing a major role in the
development of modern art Eugène Delacroix was born on the 26th of April 1798 just outside Paris
his father Charles was a lawyer and a politician and his mother came from an illustrious family of
cabinet makers but there's a certain mystery surrounding his birth because a rumor flew
around that in fact his real father was the celebrated politician and statesman Maurice
Talleyrand although nothing was ever proved when Delacroix was just seven Charles his father died
he left a considerable sum of money to his wife but through financial mismanagement she left her
family with almost nothing on her death nine years later Eugène now an orphan moved in with
his elder sister and her husband despite the setbacks Delacroix managed to get into a good school in Paris
where he won prizes for classics and for drawing enabling him to enter the prestigious Ecole des
Beaux-Arts and to study the work of the old masters at first hand just over the river in the Louvre in the 19th
century the salon was the place where every artist wanted to exhibit his or occasionally her work the
selection jury there could make or break careers but success led to public and private commissions the
salon was held every two years up to 1833 from then on though it was an annual event in the summer of 1821
Delacroix decided he was ready for the salon and he began work on a picture which was accepted by the jury the
following April it's called the bark of Dante and is taken from the great poem by the late medieval
Florentine poet Dante who has this poetic journey from hell through purgatory to paradise and what
Delacroix takes is hell and the inferno the bark is the small boat in which Dante himself is cited clad
here in red with an amazing expression of surprise and terror on his face and next to him is his
accompanist the great Roman poet Virgil who has this serene expression on his face with the laurel
leaf on his head and then next to them with his back turned to us is the boatkeeper from the river
Styx Phlegius who is struggling to get through this lake that surrounds the infernal city of
this and all around the damned are trying desperately to be saved and to get aboard the boat the inspiration
for the work Dante was oddly enough rare in French art even though Dante had fueled Italian art for the
previous five centuries no major French salon painter had ever attempted this subject matter
but of course the real inspiration for this subject is clear it's Jericho's Raft of the Medusa and the
drama and the lighting and the subject matter of figures struggling to get on board a boat
but I think what also struck the contemporary iron certainly what strikes us looking at the work
is the detailing not just the expressions but look at the way that colors use now Delacroix becomes one
of the great colorists in Western art but here it's very subtle particularly in the way that the
droplets of water are painted where instead of using the usual grays he uses a mixture of red and green
and yellow and white what he says is the palette of creation the rainbow rather than the muted colors that
have usually been used and this work was acquired by the French state and the reaction critically was one
of astonishment rather than admiration but nonetheless the feeling was there that here was the next young
talent in French art shortly after completing the bark of Dante Delacroix began to keep a journal leaving us an
extensive and fascinating insight into the workings of the artist's mind I'm carrying out my plan formulated so many times of writing a journal the writer has to say almost everything in order to make himself understood but in painting it is as if some mysterious bridge was set up between the spirit of the persons in the picture and the beholder we ought to steep ourselves from time to time in great and beautiful works of art
Delacroix now organized all his attempts to make great and beautiful works of art with the salon in mind
the next one was scheduled for 1824 and this was the work that Delacroix exhibited larger bolder brasher than the bark of Dante and entitled scenes from the massacres at Chios
and what had happened was that 90,000 inhabitants on this island had been subjected to over two months of burning pillaging looting and raping to the extent that there were less than 1,000 left the rest have been killed or deported for slavery and Delacroix had both read contemporary newspaper accounts and also interviewed eyewitnesses but in the end
in the end that was a springboard for his imagination the paintings dominated by the figures in the foreground who are all the Greeks who are awaiting death or slavery they all seem to be paired up from the woman crying leaning on the shoulder of the man who's been injured to perhaps the most touching scene the young child searching for his mother's nipple for nourishment while his mother lies dead again one of the noticeable things about the painting is this detail and color
not least in the red around the old woman's eyes flecked with green it's complimentary and then look at the shadow on her arm red once again but again flecked with green
but then there's the drama the drama of the Turk on horseback dragging off this woman whose clothes are falling from her as a young Greek man tries to protect her
and then we move to the middle ground where there's another massacre taking place where the Turks are there with guns and swords killing a group of Greeks
and then in the shadows we notice the spectre of the Turkish guards holding their guns
and so what we have is a scene of individual episodes brought into one where ultimately everything seems utterly chaotic
and the critical reaction to the work was on one hand people said this was the new wild man of French art
and others said Delacroix has massacred painting
and this work helped to polarize the situation in France that became a battle if you like between
classicism and the art that had been put forward by people like David idealness beauty order harmony
and its antithesis romanticism the subversion of classicism naturalism emotion the idea of sketchiness
and speed and intensity and all of those things Delacroix stood for the massacre of Chios was bought by the
French state for 6,000 francs which Delacroix used to fund a trip to London this three-month journey was
highly significant young artists tended to opt for the classical splendors of Italy but Delacroix made it clear
that his interest was in contemporary art and in particular the emerging British school notably Constable and Bonnington
this art he saw as a breath of fresh air in comparison to the rigidity of French painting
but it was English literature which partly inspired his next major work
in 1828 Delacroix was back in the salon to produce what turns out to be the third of the great three early works
and an image that he called his massacre number two and a painting that is still the most radical work he ever painted
and it's called the death of Sardanapalus
Sardanapalus was the Assyrian king who lived in the palace of Nineveh in the ninth century before the birth of Christ
but the precedence for the painting for Delacroix was a play written by Lord Byron in 1821 and subsequently performed in Paris
in Byron's play Sardanapalus kills himself along with one concubine
because the rebels are at the door of his palace of Nineveh
but in Delacroix's painting the king lies almost languidly like some reclining Venus on this giant billowing pink bed
with a concubine next to him pleading with him that a life isn't taken
but all around him people are being killed by his eunuchs and by the palace guards
there's a potion of poison being brought
and in the top right hand corner we can see the billowing flames just beginning
as if to tell us that shortly everything will go up in smoke
and it's almost like an image of a latter-day cult where everyone is condemned to die
but at the centre of it all is this kind of mystical enigmatic cultish leader
for many people this painting remains at the apex of romantic art
brilliant colours, dynamic brushstrokes, a dynamic composition where the eye is always drawn over the painting
and Delacroix himself said, I really hate organised painting
my disorganised mind has a void, this dark void he talks about that needs to be filled
and in a way that's what's going on here
and the subject matter is extreme too
suicide was favoured by romantic artists and writers like Goethe
but here by expanding it into a mass suicide
Delacroix was deemed to have pushed his art off the edge
and that sadly was the broad consensus amongst both critics and the public
that this was almost a delirious image
and this time the state didn't buy the painting
but it remained among Delacroix's favoured works
and it still strikes a chord
it still has this sense of energy and subversion
it's a total subversion of everything that classical art and order stood for
In 1822 when Delacroix had first shown at the salon with the bark of Dante
he was an unknown artist
now, just eight years later though
he was at the very heart of the French artistic establishment
but Paris was soon to become embroiled in political and military turmoil
which in turn led to Delacroix's most famous painting
Delacroix lived in turbulent revolutionary times
and it was this energy and excitement that fuelled the best of his painting
when Delacroix was born, Napoleon Bonaparte had seized power
proclaimed himself emperor
and ruled over France and much of Europe
for the next decade and a half
only being defeated in the end by the Duke of Wellington
at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815
there then followed the restoration of the Bourbon Monarchy
who at least ostensibly understood that there was no going back
to the pretensions of the Ancien Regime
Nonetheless, they did try and establish a regressive, repressive Catholic monarchy
which in effect was turning the clock back
and on the 25th of July 1830
the repressive King Charles X
abolished the freedom of the press
dissolved the chamber of deputies
and altered the election laws
and in turn, the people of Paris rose up in revolution
which gave Delacroix the subject
for his most iconic large scale work
and this is Delacroix's pictorial response to the July revolution
a painting called Liberty Leading the People
painted between October and December
in a rush of creative energy by Delacroix
who tries to combine fact and fiction
to affirm that he was there
by showing his signature
on a piece of gnarled wood
in the right hand side of the painting
and also as he says
I didn't fight
but at least I can paint for the country
but look at the composition and you realise
that this is a very carefully constructed
and quite ordered painting by Delacroix standards
at the pinnacle of this pyramid
is the figure of Liberty
a combination of a working class girl
and some kind of classical statue
with her breast revealed rather tokenistically
but I suppose to show that she can also be
mother of the people
a kind of nourishing figure
and then down below her
there are various carefully observed types
of working class figures
on the left hand side clutching a sabre
there's a factory worker
then in a top hat holding a gun
slightly up the social scale
is an artisan
and then kneeling at the feet of Liberty
is a country labourer
on the right hand side
the young boy clutching two pistols
and then to the right of the boy
clearly visible
amidst the billowing clouds of smoke
you can see Notre Dame
as if to affirm that this is contemporary Paris
even though this would not have been possible to see
in quite this way
but nevertheless
Delacroix wants to say
this is my world
but of course
at the apex of the composition
is the flag
is the tricolor
and if you look at the colour
throughout the painting
which is muted
by the standards of Delacroix's previous art
there's this very subtle build-up
of red, white and blue
found throughout the work
but there
proclaimed
as the pinnacle
and there is something very ordered
and almost classical about this work
it's as if Delacroix has stepped back
from the extreme edges of Romanticism
to something relatively more controlled
it's also a picture
that struck a huge chord
both with critics and public alike
when it was exhibited in the 1831 Salon
and as a consequence of this work
Delacroix received the Légion d'honneur
now it's become an icon
of the French Republic
Delacroix's official status
was further enhanced in 1832
when he was invited to go to Morocco
as part of an official delegation
to see the Sultan
France had recently conquered Algeria
and was very keen
both to allay Moroccan fears
and also to re-establish a new relationship
between the two countries
and for Delacroix
the journey would shape the course of his art
for the rest of his life
Once here in Morocco
the exotic Orient
that had only existed in Delacroix's imagination
suddenly started to seem real
and his world was filled with new sensations
smells, sounds
and of course
a new vision
Each part of the six month trip
was documented through Delacroix's journals
and his letters
and most significantly
his sketchbooks
the majority of his time
was spent in Tangiers
immersing himself in a culture
that was largely unfamiliar
but which through Delacroix's images
became a mecca for Western artists
over the next few decades
whilst in Tangiers
he was invited to a Jewish wedding
which he subsequently painted
he shows the contrast of light
streaming into the courtyard
with the dark shadows on either side
the Jews are on the left
with the woman dancing
and then the Moors on the right
all observed
from above
from beyond the balustrade
and then of course
from down below
by implication
by the painter
After six weeks in Tangiers
the entourage were given orders
to travel to the imperial city of Mekanes
for an audience with the Sultan
finally
after a week of waiting
a crowd gathered here
there were standard bearers
and musicians
and cavalrymen
and people just looking
at what was about to happen
and then the Sultan appeared
at the Bab al-Mansur
the gateway
to the imperial city
It was an event
which burned itself
into Delacroix's imagination
and inspired this canvas
some 13 years later
Delacroix stayed in Morocco
for another three months
leaving for France
on the 10th of June
and going by Algiers and Spain
on the way home
The trip filled his sketchbooks
and his imagination
and it equipped him
for a full-blown
and seductive assault
on the Parisian art world
Back in France
Delacroix completed
and then exhibited
perhaps his greatest
and certainly most accomplished painting
from the Moroccan journey
It's called
The Women of Algiers
in their apartment
and it was shown
at the salon
in 1834
On one level
this painting
reaches new heights
of naturalism
as a kind of documentary realism
about the work
that stems from the fact
as we know
that Delacroix made sketches
in an actual harem
in Algiers
from which much of the work
is based
but we also know too
that it's still rooted
in that slightly exotic
other kind of fantasy
that dominates
the Western imagination
The work can also be read
in the context
of France's colonisation
of Algeria
Harim
or haram
means sacred
and in a way
by depicting this scene
Delacroix
is making that space
seem less sacred
less mysterious
however
what he's doing
in this work
is also
showing
or trying to show
the harim
as it actually was
and not
as some kind of caricature
of Western sexual fantasy
for a start
the women are clothed
there's plenty of limbs around
but they're not
sprawling naked
and therefore
explicitly sexualised
they seem ultimately
in control
they seem remote
and self-contained
and although the painting's
intimate
in the way that the detail
of the still life
the slippers
the cushions
the rugs
the pipe
is painted in the foreground
the women also act
as a kind of veil
or a screen
to what lies behind
which is in turn
revealed by the black servant
who's pulling the curtain
away to reveal
something of the inner mystery
of the harim
with the door open
but we only get
a flickering
fleeting glimpse
and ultimately
it seems a painting
of mood
it's that languid
sensual late afternoon
where the shadows
are falling
creeping in from the left
and where colour
as always
in Delacroix
has this amazing sense
of control
but also of procession
and this is a painting
that when the critics
saw it
in the 1834 salon
left them
to a certain extent
nonplussed
people said
nothing is happening here
because it was on such a large scale
they expected something
of the drama
of Delacroix's
previous history paintings
but in a way
what he's done here
is much more subtle
it has this much more subtle
hedonistic atmosphere to it
and it's this painting
perhaps above all others
that has struck a chord
with painters of future generations
Matisse adored this painting
and was partly driven to go to Morocco
as a consequence of it
Picasso did variations on it
the Spanish filmmaker
Louis Bunuel said
he could almost smell
the incense in the picture
and perhaps most memorably
Paul Cézanne said
looking at this picture
it enters your eye
in the way that a glass of wine
slips down the throat
and in the end
leaves you feeling intoxicated
soon after Delacroix's return
from Morocco
he was given the first
of a series of commissions
for decorative projects
in public and private buildings
around Paris
the first was for the
Palais Bourbon
or the National Assembly
as it's now known
here in the Salon du Roi
initially built as a throne room
Delacroix painted a frieze
running around the top
of the room
punctuated by window arches
filled with allegorical figures
highlighting the key aspects
of a successful state
justice
commerce
industry
agriculture
and war
all supported by
eight large columns
or piers
on which Delacroix painted
allegorical figures
representing the main rivers
of France
and the surrounding oceans
such was the success
of the Salon du Roi
that Delacroix
was then asked
to decorate the Bourbon
Palace's library
for eight years
struggling with ill health
he painted two half domes
and five large bays
a vast pictorial saga
of the rise and fall
of classical civilization
and learning
at one end
the lyric poet
Orpheus
brings enlightenment
to the early Greeks
whilst at the other
Attila the Hun
and his hordes
overrun Italy
and the arts
In between
the bays are filled
with ancient classical
and biblical stories
which Delacroix
believed to embody
the main subjects
of any library
history
philosophy
poetry
science
eloquence
law
and theology
and then
in 1854
Delacroix finally
began to work
on an illustrious
commission
he'd actually received
five years earlier
to paint three murals
for the church
of Saint-Sulpice
in the small
Chapelle de Saint-Ange
lit only from
a stained glass window
Delacroix painted
three works
that emphasized
the struggle
between good and evil
here
Jacob wrestles
with the angel
the Emperor
Heliodorus
is driven from
the temple
whose treasures
he was trying to seize
and finally
the archangel
Michael
defeats the devil
and proclaims
the triumph
of God
While Delacroix
was working
on the Saint-Sulpice murals
he became involved
in a project
in 1855
by the French government
to respond
to the great exhibition
that had taken place
in London
four years earlier
the new imperial regime
of Louis-Napoleon
wanted to assert
French superiority
in commerce
and the arts
and in order to do this
he staged
an exposition universelle
in which
there were pavilions
of work
by living artists
from each country
and Delacroix
was given pride of place
with his first major
retrospective exhibition
as well as being made
a member of the
French Academy
late recognition
for an artist
who'd played
the salon system
so effectively
but whose impact
transcended it
for Delacroix
offered an expansive
highly original
and often exotic
vision
which over the ensuing
decades
was to inspire artists
and filmmakers
from Manet
to Louis-Bernuel
Delacroix never stopped
painting
until his strength
finally deserted him
art was an all-consuming
affair for him
he never married
because as he put it
he needed nothing else
in his life
apart from painting
but in the winter
of 1862
he caught a cold
and then contracted
a severe virus
and although he was
looked after
by his trusty
mate Jenny
he died
on the 13th
of August
1862
having supposedly
uttered his last words
I had enough in my head
for another 40 years
mother
who
had
who
the
who
Amen.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.