Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Your obstinacy to see this film is incomprehensible.
If you had wanted to see Griffith's "Intolerance" for example,
which is an authentic masterpiece of cinema...
But Lemaître's film has no aesthetic nor ideological value.
It's just a boring jumble of commonplace ideas.
What shit!
Aren't you ashamed to want to see that?
Couples should consider the price of a hotel room instead.
You're really crazy to want to watch that!
HAS THE FEATURE STARTED YET?
Sound engineer:
With the faces and voices of:
This film is dedicated to Jean-Isidore Isou, who will be
always, towards and against all, he who will come.
Has the Feature Started Yet?
Maurice Lemaître wonders why he made this film.
Isn't it a totally absurd enterprise?
Already, as a child, he would hide in his bed
besieged by darkness.
Lying in a coffin whose rough boards bruised his elbows,
shredding noises like flesh,
his brain gurgling empty like an unclogged sink,
he searched horrified for signs of a useless, bland life
with no "arc de triomphe" at its end.
He was rotting alive in this carriage of gilded feet.
He was surrounded by
the works of men, changing each morning.
The names of these men were gasped from reluctant mouths
like the hiss of a punctured balloon.
The new conquerors trample the elderly
who cast sudden watchful glances as they struggle and strive
to save their pensions and avoid a forever
worrisome retirement.
Maurice Lemaître mused over his death in the same banal way...
Like a million other imbeciles he thought:
"I don't want to die!"
Millions of those guys die.
Then the obituaries say they "are no longer."
We should complain
instead that Mr. or Mrs. Smith "never were."
But when someone impressive dies,
his remains are hastily gathered in fear
and he is proclaimed to be still living.
Years and years go by
and his name is endlessly evoked
with sacred fervor and trembling,
standing stiffer to attention
than a subordinate in front of his superior.
Mediocrity calls for a scalpel.
It attracts insults degrading to our purity.
Maurice Lemaître has slowly learned that
centuries are reduced to a few names.
On this earth no one has lived but
Socrates, Dante, Joyce!
But if passions die, the world has one implacable law
one absolute determination: the law of creation.
In this, the little idiot, Maurice Lemaître sees his chance
for survival and salvation.
Art, history and science thus become painkillers.
The author mocks these artifices
invented by men who cannot admit to incongruous death.
But he needs these steps to
save himself from the grave which his pride refuses.
At seventeen, in one of those heathen temples
of the twentieth century called movie theaters
he dreamed of becoming an important film director
managing, in a loud voice,
ten stars and a hundred crew members,
the almighty master of these slaves,
as they build the pyramid of his Name.
Since then, the author has understood creation
as the unique chance to make a truly free gesture!
That it's the only hard, white marble in this black, muddy
universe of filthy, rotting stinking vermin... you!
And if this film is like what you will see,
if it seems to its creator like an unexpected offspring,
the monster son of a naive and romantic father,
it is his unique possibility,
the only means available to him
to make a name in the history of cinema.
Lemaître knows, he can only resolve his death by giving
a unique meaning to his life
in the meantime.
He still has one more hope
once expressed by Isidore Isou:
"I treat masterpieces as temporary moments because
if they were anything else
they would not have left me mortal and miserable.
If these masterpieces and their creators were pure beings,
in themselves definitive elements, they would have
already given me what I sought between the lines,
that which I discovered in my books, which will be offered
to everyone:
immortality through their own works
and ultimately, actual
immortality of their beings.
Please inflict on me what I inflict myself
on the gods who preceded me if I don't keep my promise.
Let them leave me, young men who seek themselves in me.
Let them abandon me and go farther and elsewhere.
Let them treat me as desperately as I treat books:
as a means and not as an end.
All compositions that preceded
cannot be accomplished ends in themselves
because they have not marked the accomplishment of everyone,
the final end, in grace, of all humanity."
Maurice Lemaître,
one of the most cynical guys in our contemporary world,
one of the most chilling killers
of modern sacrilege, surpasses himself in new belief
and swears to continue
until death and beyond,
in order to open the messianic times.
Gil J. Wolman!
That was "41 degrees and 5 seconds"
by Gil J. Wolman.
Here is how the performance will unfold
of Lemaître's film:
a rose-colored screen will be installed in front
of the movie theater, its neon lights turned off
as soon as night falls on the boulevard.
For an hour before the film,
an impassive projectionist will screen classics of cinema
like Griffith's "Intolerance."
On the sidewalk in front
of the theatre will be written in huge yogurt white letters:
"Here at 8:30"
"Film show"
with an arrow pointing toward the ticket counter.
Above the ticket counter,
on the billboard, a gigantic poster
with no illustrations will indicate the film's title:
"HAS THE FEATURE STARTED YET?"
Each side of the entry hall will have photos under glass
with images of the following:
a) A kiss (in close-up), it doesn't matter which stars.
b) A skier going down a slope.
The mountain where the shot was taken pales in importance
next to the foreground action.
c) A shampoo ad,
the brand is unimportant.
A clip from an ad for a brand of aperitif and sparkling water.
d) The current French President
dexterously laying bricks.
e) Cowboys chasing Indians on horseback.
f) A step in manufacturing buttons for men's underwear.
g) An image from some cartoon.
Although the film was announced to start at 8:30,
people will be made to wait in line until 9:30.
During the hour they wait
dusty carpets will be shaken
from the second floor above them
and ice-cold water will be poured over their heads.
Those carrying out this loathsome business will
exchange insults with particularly loud extras
paid by the theater to mingle in
the dense crowd.
- Stop it or we'll call the police.
- That's good for your voice, herring-skin,
don't go to films then.
- That's my business.
- Fuck you. - Come say that up here.
- Why trouble myself for a clod-head like you?
Only at that moment,
to avoid further scandal, the theater doors
will be opened violently by another group of extras
of all ages, in diverse attires.
They will rush and form
an excited crowd around the box office, loudly exclaiming:
- This film stinks. - They're taunting us.
- What the hell is going on?
They will rush to the screen outside
where Griffith's film will still be showing.
They will watch attentively, interrupting
with noisy approval, such as:
- This is real cinema. - Should've watched this.
The manager will end the scandal
and will try to dissuade the people in line
from seeing the film.
- You are out of your mind to want to see this!
...even insulting some couples
- Listen, if you want I'll give you some cash
so you can pay for a hotel room.
The same extras as earlier,
will stop yelling at the people upstairs and beg
the manager to be allowed in.
- Be nice, we just want to know what it is.
- What's the point?
- Do you take us for idiots? Now, after waiting...
- There is no cashier.
- It doesn't matter, I can collect the money.
After the debate, in a despising and weary tone, the manager...
- Oh, after all, what do I care...
...will raise his hands in helplessness
and slowly withdraw to the projection booth.
The shouts and exhortations of the extras will follow...
- Let's go. The film is free!
- Get a seat quickly!
rushing joyfully into the dark.
The theater will be plunged into blackness...
- We can't see a thing! Lights!
...and no usher will show them to their seats.
They will seat themselves in great confusion...
- Don't push!
...they will jostle each other in controlled mayhem...
- Sit here, it's better! - No, I'd rather sit in front!
A fight with angry words...
- Excuse me, but I was here before you
- You could be a bit more polite
- Who do you think you are?
Do you need the whole row? - Idiot!
- Repeat that and see what happens, imbecile.
...will start among the extras.
As they bicker,
cowboys and Indians will chase each other on the screen.
The screen will not be a rectangular shape,
but a strange form rendered by
a certain number of brightly colored fabrics
partly covering it and by different objects
hung in front of it.
These drapes and objects can be set in motion by stagehands
throughout the film.
During the pursuit,
the audience will continue looking for seats.
As soon as they are settled, or almost settled, the words
"The End" will appear on this wild screen,
accompanied by triumphant music...
...and the room will light up.
Immediately, the projectionist's voice will be heard...
- Audience members who have already seen this film
are requested to exit the theater
through the door at the back right.
Two janitors, one with a broom and the other
with a bucket of dirty water, will walk into the room
and begin their work, saying:
- The bastards are smoking again.
- They take the cinema for a brothel! They hide
in the dark.
Finally, the janitors will take their tools and leave.
The manager, projectionist and the ushers
will enter wearing street clothes.
- No and no! I don't want
to project this film! As a communist
I refuse to aide this American propaganda.
- This story is starting to get on our nerves.
It's okay for the swine who sees it once,
maybe falls asleep, but we have to see it all week...
- All we fucking get here is
varicose veins. Our tips are forged coins, torn bills
and boxer-short buttons. And always bits of film,
the ends, the beginnings, nothing but spare parts!
At that moment, a landscape of dazzling sun
will appear to the eyes of the suddenly blinded audience, and...
It was a winter evening
of sickening black cream.
November or December? I don't remember very well
because today it is buried in the huge crater of faded memory.
I had boots of mud and rustling money,
this joyous crackling announcing new bills in the fist,
confirming my desire for the warm dampness,
for the night, for the escape from this diluvian reality.
The only drug at hand then, the only cheap morphine was...
But why tell stories?
These stories are always the same; literature doesn't
want them anymore.
People tire themselves uselessly inventing them.
Serious people can be seen stuffing themselves full
of low-rank anecdotes with a satisfied belch.
Well, what then? A young man, Robert,
falls in love with a young girl, Michelle.
Where could I make them meet?
Anyway, Robert does not want to get married,
feeling unsuited for marriage.
Me neither. Furthermore, I...
Michelle, however, a beautiful, buxom redhead,
though she plays hard to get, dreams only of marriage.
- Young woman, 22, sporty, caring, domestic, unselfish
good body, serious, Catholic would like to meet and marry
a distinguished, well-bred man in good position. Reply to #5556
- Widow, 50, good in all aspects with flat, would like to
meet and marry a man in good standing,
tall, distinguished, serious, learned.
- Paris, 30, elegant, nice flat would marry
a smart, loyal, caring man Standing not important.
If not seriously interested, abstain from replying.
- All these women... What the hell do I care about all this?
Or better: a very young man
spends a short holiday on a fashionable beach. One day,
in the blue water of the bay, he meets a...
With his stinginess, yes, with his stinginess.
He meets a charming woman with a sexy name, Veronique, who is
scarcely older than he is.
How can you not fall in love?
Yes, how can you not fall in love with Veronique?
Little pills, perhaps?
Stuffs himself with fish soup, the satisfied burp of a man.
Or still:
George has been married
for six years to a gorgeous woman named Suzanne.
But he meets... - Enough, enough!
The screen will then turn completely black
and a man will climb up on stage with a flashlight.
Directing its beam at different viewers,
he will cry out:
- What did you come here for?
After this alarming remark,
another individual from the room will join him by saying:
- That's what I want to know.
What did I come here for?
To sleep? To forget? To forget what?
And aiming the flashlight at a couple,
- and you are kissing, you're petting.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the latest statistics show
that X% of the audience is under twenty years old,
Y% between twenty and thirty,
and Z% over thirty.
I am really wondering...
His elbow's beginning to bug me.
To escape from this diluvian reality.
This wet rat smell.
Ugly face.
This smug and idiotic smile.
There he is, embracing the beautiful tart!
- I love love stories!
Love, complicity in baseness, while falling, as said...
The back door, with a sign
"Projection room, do not enter" will open and...
- Mr. Lemaître, you've forgotten the credits.
- What? Who's the son of a bitch...? Marcelle!
Where did you put the credits?
- The credits! The credits!
- Silence!
A long silence will endure.
And where are the stars in this film?
Ladies and gentlemen,
due to financial difficulties facing French cinema
and the great demand for stars, we must inform
our amiable patrons that there will be no stars in...
- OK, Albert, let's go.
The wolf and the lamb.
Master Crow, perched, held a cheese in his beak.
Master Fox came for the odor... this language.
- Got a light? - Thanks.
- Hello, how are you? - Is your stop next?
- Fine. - Sorry, did I hurt you?
- There you go.
- Taxi, are you free? - What weather...
- Yes, it's brisk compared to the summer...
- What's the time? - Waiter, beer!
- How much?
- A token, please.
- Officer, where can I find a cinema?
By order.
In line.
Wait for police.
- You haven't seen it all.
- So I told him... what do you think... I told him though...
- You'll grow out of it.
- And what do you do?
In accordance with the law of November 7, 1945, the audience
is reminded that it is strictly forbidden
to smoke in the theater. Thank you.
- Come on. The cop is gone. Hide it!
Next week on this screen,
you can see a story of love and death, an unforgettable film
set on the marvellous island of...
Tell me, George, have you seen "City in Fear"?
Do you remember when Hayworth tells Bogart in the car...
Sir, please put out your cigarette. It is forbidden.
No, it wasn't in "City in Fear,"
it was in "Desperate in the Desert."
Are you sure? Yes, of course.
The usher's beacon.
I am a boat lost in the storm.
What a banal image!
- You have time to waste! - Nice to meet you.
- Has the feature started yet? - No, newsreels.
How often have these women heard that?
Nauseating. I can't do that.
To go to the cinema ready for anything.
The incredible adventure...
- One ticket please - Orchestra or balcony?
- Want a program?
It's always the same. Trying to refuse without...
Sir, could you move along, so that we may...
Why do people leave empty seats between each other?
Myself. Oh shit, her arm.
Dear sir, re: yours of the 30th.
Our correspondents in London.
Have supplied us with the necessary help.
Would you be so kind as to.
It should be understood that in case we are incapable.
Please.
This sensation of thrusting a sword into putty.
This violent desire to go right through her, hurt her,
stab her with this sword, plunge this burning revolver into her.
To make her guts explode in the sun...
Like... barbarians, huns.
- Men. Not one can redeem another.
They are all the same.
- Women. They are all bitches. They all want to be in movies.
- Will there be a war?
There have been up to the present two economic models:
classical and critical.
According to this discipline,
the theories can be divided into
classical conceptions and
abstract ones, dealing with pure subjects.
How then do you account for the fact that after
the proletariat came to power
there were still civil wars, class problems,
the formation of the new caste of bureaucrats and
innumerable trials since the one in Moscow.
Manifesto for an uprising of youth:
"As long as youths suffer
slavery and hierarchical abuse
they will devote themselves to
all violent follies and barbarities
to escape their inexistence.
There are men who want to stay the way they are
who don't want any changes.
And there are masses of
young people, who fight to overthrow everything.
That's why the Fascists, who addressed youths
with false claims have vanquished more
successfully than anarchists, who continued to hold on to
factories and proletariats.
In Italy, where the population equals France, Mussolini
gained power with 200,000 young people.
In Russia (160 million inhabitants)
Lenin created a revolution with 500,000 - 800,000 men.
The 'established' are passive
because they don't want the risk. They have
possessions or children to defend.
Young people, who have nothing to lose,
represent the attack and adventure itself.
The young people carried out
the resistance, not the leaders,
commanding from their armchairs.
Revolutions were made by the young of all classes, that
betrayed and rejected them. May the young be not commodities
but consumers through their own impetus.
If you don't save the young
the young will be your ruin."
I felt warmth flushing my cheeks.
The girl's elbow relaxed, motionless, on my arm.
I understood less and less the images
on the screen, this rope of noise and desire.
My arm and leg were paralyzed by agonizing prickling.
The audience laughed on a gag I didn't. I forced a guffaw.
A lightening. Their eyes met.
Their intimacy immediately became
intense, the uproar complicit.
- We could go for a drink.
- Did you like the film?
Our antennas are touching.
This waiting for the catalyst
that unbridles everything, that hurls us towards the chaos of.
What kind of girl? Book on her knees. Her knees.
The triumphant classical music.
The impossible unexpected, unless.
- Get your "France Soir," "Le Monde."
- What are you reading?
Maxine van der... bitch.
All of them are.
To crush her breasts, to lacerate them in one's teeth.
- Do you think it will rain?
- I don't read much. No time.
- Do you want to have a drink?
All the research to project in 3D: the embossed screen,
the oscillating grid screen, the water tank, filters,
are completely devoid of interest.
Cinema is an art, by God,
get that into your skull, it's an art!
There is no essential difference between poetry, music and cinema.
An art is a composition of meanings and techniques
and something more in its masterworks.
Film already has its techniques, this something more needs work.
Mechanical research alone will not make cinema evolve.
It might create another art-form, but cinema
will pursue it's evolution, in which this film is a step.
My screen is not the perfection of the technique.
Hanging objects on it is not enough.
It only breaks the normal frame
of cinematographic representation.
The smell of stink bombs thrown by the extras will spread
through the theater and be greeted by cries.
- What is this smell?
- Open the windows or we'll suffocate!
Here is a letter from Mr. N. in Bécon-les-Bruyères.
I'm a skilled worker in a construction business
earning a good living.
I was a painter, but sometimes one must sacrifice passions
to insure one's well-being.
I was twice deceived by love, but not discouraged, having
a terrible fault of thinking my desires to be realities.
Selfishly, I believed myself to be forgotten by Providence
and I had to read your column to understand
that I'm not alone and there are many others unhappier than me.
So I take courage and hope to find with your help a serious
hard-working young woman, who will love me as I am.
I'll try to give her the happiness I've never known.
This is a candid letter full of optimism, appealing to women.
If our column distracts from concerns
and causes compassion, we thank it for doing so.
Forgetting sorrows means escaping from them.
Here is another letter from Mr. G in Nancy:
I am a specialized worker.
And if I am a little awkward expressing myself on paper,
at least she'll feel my loyalty and affection, which is the key.
I earn a good living and regret
always being alone and unable to involve another in my projects.
I remain deeply convinced that the ideal woman exists,
she only needs to be discovered, we could be perfectly happy.
You will remark as we go on up there the time will come,
he hasn't changed, I told you not to do it, this is blackmail.
Ich bin der Geist, der stets verneint! Und das mit Recht;
denn alles, was entsteht, ist wert, daß es zugrunde geht.
he asked my forgiveness never before this is all your fault
at the right time whatever I beg you but this is stupid
you are very kind it's none of your business
let's go she would have done anything for him
you must be firm with this child
I permit you to slap him
due mile due cento mila cinque cento cinque cento cinque cento
vai via vai via
I've got heartburn
obviously he wasn't satisfied with that the frog
ti ponimaesh po ruski ia ne znayu dosvidania tovarish
what's playing on the boulevards
eat now or go away
England 1697 April 24th mourns the greatest of it's musicians
Henry Purcell, dead at 36
give me a pack of Gauloises if you believe little one
what is it with him
you cannot he is lazy good for nothing lucky he has his parents
to support him without that what would you do
someone's phoning you
two tickets to Trocadero when does it end you're confused
I've had it my god what have I done
I met him in the courtroom
he makes furniture now the dirty bastard
the other tall guy died in Spain or somewhere
as he was rejoining the free French forces
your father is a sub-Appolinaire
he has a sort of perfection
pass me the dictionary Christiane go and find it
get it yourself exaggerate, insult, overdo, tease, bluff
the printing press invention is not as new as we think
from cro-magnon to the men of tomorrow
il monumento di Vittorio Emmanuele mi sono perduto...
es gibt keine ties pockets hankerchiefs scarves
I'm totally exhausted second-class gunner
one two three four one two three four
ti voglio bene
cinque cento cinque cento cinque cento cinque cento cinque cento
vai via
From now on phrases will become completely incomprehensible
as a result of playing the soundtrack backwards.
One of the extras will stand up
and shoot at the screen with a revolver.
Another one will tear it up with a knife
and, passing through to the other side, will attack the wall.
The police will be called and
many viewers will be taken in the raid.
At this point in his film, the author insists
on declaring his regrets about
being unable to predict the rest of the screening,
as he is too busy making a desperate escape.
Nevertheless
this film,
to be in line with itself, and to please assholes,
must itself announce the many innovative creations introduced
into film history with its appearance.
First: destruction of the screen as we now know it
and research into possibilities for a new screen.
Second: Use of the first Joycean sentence in film,
its explosion into a series of inarticulate sounds.
Third: Defacing this process by total destruction of all
possible screenplays past and future.
Fourth: introduction of the dust of cinema in its chiseling stage,
that is: introduction of the projectionist,
the ushers, the crowd and the screening room into a film bent
on self-destruction,
and not enrichment as was the case up to now.
Fifth: from the point of view of the image,
the destruction continues
and the creation of a new, unseen world.
Dear listeners,
here now are theater reviews.
Afterwards, you can hear the evening news
on 52 meters and 63 meters 20 or 64 kilocycles, and, at 8:30,
the rest of the news.
But first, an overview of all the shows in Paris
by Jean-Jacques Laurence.
Last night was the premiere
of a Maurice Lemaître film with a strange, promising title
"HAS THE FEATURE STARTED YET?"
The audience reaction to this unusual work was mixed.
The diversity of criticism is a witness, so before talking
about the film we will
first give you some diverging opinions from the Paris press.
To start with a lively attack against this film
this is what George Rosnay writes in "Prolétaire Libéré":
"Being occupied by hordes of Americans,
we are used to centralized productions, funded
from abroad upon governmental agreement for the sole profit
of foreign capitalists and the stupefecation of the French.
But never has one seen such cynicism and complacency as in
the vulgarity of the Trotskyists who cover screens
with Fascist propaganda, while the government closes its eyes.
Compared to the incomparable productions of the Soviet Union,
Maurice Lemaître's film bursts with flattery and ass-kissing,
the very image of
a bourgeois terrified by the victory of popular vote.
Maurice Lemaître must have complied with his sponsors.
His film, of pure Nazi inspiration,
is an insult to our comrades who
gave their lives for Lemaître's liberties he so abused today.
We must unite in the face of this menace."
We hear the same from Roger Diamil
of the "Film Worker's Echo°:
"While our workers,
worn out by long labor days in capitalist factories,
refuse salary increases, denied the sacred right to a vacation
that would bring their faded children to the country,
papa's boy Maurice Lemaître throws out the window
the money of doubtful origins that he did not earn
to make a film without any value, ideological nor artistic,
that scorched the hands of personnel with famine-rate wages.
All unite against this threat.°
On the opposite
political horizon, we find similar complaints.
Francois Derais of "France-Toujours" writes:
"In films like Lemaître's
one can see the deep influence of Marxism on the youth.
No new generation filmmaker tries to defend
the essential French values, perpetuated
in history of the glorious name and spirit of France.
Only nebulous philosophers are imported into our country by
Talmudists across the Rhine.
French cinema is dying from suffocation in filthy caresses
of those wanting to destroy everything beautiful
and noble in us: the French taste for fine workmanship which
made us renowned throughout the world.
We must defend our values if we don't want
our children to accuse us of selling their heritage
the heritage of Joan of Arc, of Saint-Louis
to the carpet merchants just out of the Polish Ghettos.°
Here is Maurice de la Ruchardière
of the "Le Catholique Libéré":
"When one thinks that some of our boys and girls have
unfortunately seen the film by Lemaître,
one shudders.
One aspires to defend them from these enterprises inspired
by the devil to turn them away
from God's path, those souls who suffer and search.
A Christian facing these films, that should be
banned by a smart censor anxious to save our children,
really feels like a soldier of Christ,
sustained in his efforts by the mystery of incarnation."
Finally, a "Mondanités Parisiennes" columnist
Robert Lezise will provide us with a conclusion:
"A charming evening," he writes,
"which enabled us to admire an all new and charming hat
on the beautiful Parisian head of our colleague, France Roche.
Do you know, by the way, what's whispered in left bank salons?
It appears that France Roche hates hats;
that servitudes to fashion enslaved her against her will.
That will make people talk!
We can also mention, in the audience
Baron de Toussac accompanied by
Isabelle, a famous model, wearing a two-piece suit
in flaming yellow linen with gold buttons
and a reversible bodice with Pekinese ornaments.
This outfit, which elegant women will die for
and run jealously to Weim to buy the same,
was set off by a necklace of Caucasian blue pearls,
by the evocative name Flamenco. When we left
this oh so Parisian event
and arrived at Marquise de B's soirée,
the worst scandalmonger in our dear capital
told me all the new gossip our women readers will be the
first to hear and due to lack of space I must reveal next week."
Maurice Lemaître wonders why he made this film.
Isn't it a totally absurd enterprise?
Already, as a child, he would hide in his bed
besieged by darkness.
Lying in a coffin whose rough boards bruised his elbows,
shredding noises like flesh,
his brain gurgling empty like an unclogged sink,
he searched, horrified, for signs of a useless life
with no "arc de triomphe" at its end.
He was rotting alive in this carriage of gilded feet.
He saw around him the works of men changing each morning.
The names of these men were gasped from reluctant mouths
like the hiss of a punctured balloon.
The new conquerors trample the elderly
who, casting around them the abrupt beams of their alarmed
gaze, struggle violently to save their pensions
and avoid a forever worrisome retirement.
Maurice Lemaître mused over his death in the same banal way...
Like millions of other imbeciles he thought:
"I don't want to die!"
Millions of those guys die.
Then the obituaries say they "are no longer."
We should complain instead that Mr. or Mrs. Smith "never were."
But when someone fantastic dies,
his remains are hastily gathered in fear
and he is proclaimed to be still living.
Years and years go by
and his name is endlessly evoked
with sacred fervor and trembling, standing stiff at attention,
stiffer even than a subordinate in front of his superior.
Mediocrity calls for a scalpel.
It attracts insults degrading to our purity.
Maurice Lemaître has slowly learned that
centuries are reduced to a few names.
No one has ever lived on this earth but Socrates!
Dante! Joyce! He knows that if passions die,
the world is subject to one
implacable law, one absolute determination: creation.
Here, the little idiot Maurice Lemaître finds his great chance
for survival and salvation.
Art, history and science thus become painkillers.
The author mocks these artifices
invented by men who cannot admit to incongruous death.
But he needs these steps to
save himself from the grave which his pride refuses.
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the theater manager speaking.
As unlikely as this may seem,
the projectionist has just warned me that he cannot find
the last reel of Mr. Lemaître's film.
We don't know whether it was misplaced or
not delivered to us.
We apologize for this situation and regret, cherished customers,
that we are unable to finish the show.
Ask for candy, mints, chocolate ice cream.
Adaptation: Natasha Lesser Pip Chodorov, Moira Tierney
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.