All language subtitles for Staged Deadly Deception - S01E05 - Garage Abduction.eng

A 911 call comes in
from a man named Victor Cabrera.

He had had to dial
the 911 call with his tongue

because his hands are bound,
and there's a rope around his neck.

Cabrera then told police
his wife was kidnapped.

When something like this happened,

with someone being tied up,
someone being kidnapped,

it was a pretty big shock
to the whole community.

Crimes like this
don't just happen.

They're not finding any evidence of
someone who has seen an abduction.

There's no follow-up ransom.

He told police it took two

to plan and carry out the murder.

She was found the next day,
strangled to death in her truck.

We're not dealing with an
abduction anymore.

We're dealing with a murder.

Where did you find the car?

What happened to her?
How could this have happened?

The minute Victor got home,

he packed his belongings,
and he disappeared.

It's bad enough looking for a
fugitive in one single country.

But he could literally be
anywhere in the world.

We have a dead body in a car,

and we have the inconsistencies
in his statement.

Does that fit with what
we found at the crime scene?

Does that fit with his injuries?

Does it
fit with the pathological evidence?

The best way to think of a crime
is almost like a puzzle, right?

You start off with a couple pieces
that don't give you

the full picture, but the more
information you start getting,

the picture becomes clearer,
and then you start seeing,

"OK, this is what happened."

The first thing in a staged scene
that we're looking for is,

what would be the motive
to stage the scene?

We're looking for consistencies
and inconsistencies.

That brings more suspicion on.

It is not what happened.
There's something else that's there.

Marina, which is very close
to Monterey, is very beautiful.

It's really close to the beach.

There's a lot of beautiful homes,
lots of nice shops

and places to go. People seem
to live very calm, quiet lives.

Not a lot of crime goes on there.

Monterey County in general
is a safe county.

It doesn't mean
that crime does not occur.

I think any place can have crime.

But I think law enforcement
does a tremendous job

in trying to keep it safe.

Roshni Singh was a single mother.

She had a seven-year-old son.
And she lived in Marina.

And she seemed to have created
a nice life for herself.

She had some funds
that she had saved.

She was someone who was,
you know, beloved in the area.

She had a warm,
bright presence and personality

and was very well-liked
by everybody.

Victor worked at an auto body shop
nearby called Village Motor Works.

And it was a place
that he had worked for a while.

And he was hoping one
day to become the owner.

From the outside,

Roshni and Victor seemed like they
had a really strong bond,

that they were a strong couple.

They had been together for quite
some time.

They seemed to have good chemistry,
were happy together.

You know,
they had just gone on a trip

to visit Roshni's sister in Fiji.

So things seem to be going well
between the two of them.

Roshni's sister did have SOME red
flags when it came to Victor.

She thought that he was
a bit of a smooth talker,

that maybe
he was a bit of a Don Juan.

But other than that,

she didn't see anything about him
that would give her pause

or that would ever indicate
that he could do something violent.

I was a patrol officer in 2008,
in September.

That's when Victor
called 911 from a gas station.

Victor Cabrera claimed two men
had come into where he was.

He wasn't really sure what
these men intended,

if they were going
to really harm him.

He was tied up.
He thought that was a robbery,

and he assumed that they had
abducted his girlfriend,

who had been waiting outside
in the car.

And Victor claimed that he had had
to dial the 911 call with his tongue

because he was so tightly bound.

The first thing we would look for
is evidence of a robbery,

because that's the complaint.
So is there any forced entry?

Is there any money missing
or anything like that?

That would be our first thing

that everybody wants to concentrate
on because that's normal.

The timing of the robbery
was very odd.

The ropes weren't
knotted around his hands,

and they didn't bind his feet.

When the police come, they find
that there's a rope around his neck,

and it is pretty tight,

but his feet were free,
and he could have just walked out.

Police will initially
have a hard time figuring out

what is really going on here.
And where is this young woman?

And has something terrible
happened to her, and if so, why?

Why is this so elaborate?

It seems as if someone else
has to be involved

for him to be bound
in this particular manner.

My question is,
is why was there an abduction?

If there's a robbery,
there's no need for an abduction

unless you're going to, you know,

hold for ransom
or something like that.

It's not completely one thing
or the other.

You take these things as they are.

You keep an open mind, and the
evidence starts to kind of build up

and point you
in a particular direction.

When you start to move
in that particular direction,

the crucial thing is
is that you still keep an open mind,

and you look for evidence that
supports that theory

but also evidence
that might contradict that theory.

The way that he was found
doesn't make sense.

And his physical condition
after having been tied up.

He didn't have any bruises, cuts.

And I find it difficult
to imagine robbers

who wanted to incapacitate someone
wouldn't have tied their feet.

Now,
none of these things are definitive.

They are simply things that cause or
raise a question in your mind,

that make you think, "OK,

I'm going to keep my mind open about
this and see where it takes me."

The police would be
looking for his demeanour

and whether he's worried
about this girlfriend.

If she's dead and he knows it,

he's not going to be frantic.

He's not going to be
demanding that they find her.

He's not going to be trying
to help with any kind of search.

They would need to find
the girlfriend,

find her because
she is in extreme danger,

and we don't know where she is.

That person's life is on the line.

It really started off with
Victor Cabrera calling the police,

saying that,
"Hey, I'm at this gas station,

I work here.
I was just robbed.

I was tied up, and my girlfriend,

Roshni Singh, has been kidnapped."

That was the initial information
that he relayed to police.

And so police took Victor
to the Monterey Police Department.

They had an interview with him
at the time.

The police question him
for several hours,

and his story is a long,

winding story of how he and his
girlfriend have been driving around.

She reminded him that they
were going to go

to Berkeley the next day.
And then he realised

he had left his wallet at work,
so he had to go get that.

And she got into the backseat
of the car,

because there were things
in the garage

that made it difficult for her
to get into the passenger side.

All of these excess details
were kind of needless

and windy.
His story was all over the place.

Though what the police
would want to do would be,

particularly
if they were suspicious,

would be to corroborate
that account.

The obvious means
of corroborating that account

would be to have him
medically examined.

If someone is punched several times,

there will usually be some injuries.

The cops would have seen
he didn't have those injuries.

Most importantly,
his feet were untied.

So what robber's going
to tie you up

and forget your feet?

If you're going to rob somewhere,

you want to be confident that
what you're after is there.

So if they were after cash,

most businesses
will bank cash in the evening.

So it may be there is no cash there.

Another fact that the police might
have been suspicious about was that,

according to Cabrera,

he never heard the car leaving.

Now again, it's not definitive.

It may well be he was
so fearful that he never noticed it,

but he didn't hear the car leaving.

He never heard his wife scream
or make any sounds.

These again would start to kind
of build up the suspicions

of the officers
that this was not actually a crime

and had been staged.

They're not finding any evidence
of someone

who has seen an abduction.

There's no follow-up ransom.

Crimes like this don't just happen.

So if you're not finding
any evidence

that's consistent with the report,
you have to step back and think,

"OK, something else is going on."

When police are questioning
somebody to get information,

they will be looking
at his behaviour.

When is it inconsistent?
For example,

if he tends to talk with his hands,

but all of a sudden
they're down and stable,

or he gives certain types
of gestures,

or he goes vague at certain points

when he's been
highly detailed before.

So they're looking
for inconsistencies in his manner

and his narrative
and holes in the story.

One of the things that he told
police at the time

was that he called 911
using his tongue,

and it took him
about 45 minutes to do that.

So that was already kind of,
"This is kind of interesting."

As police are interviewing Cabrera

and he's telling this long,
detailed story,

they believe he's
involved in something,

but they don't really
know exactly what.

They don't have the missing car.

They don't know
where his girlfriend is,

and they really can't arrest him
for anything.

They were suspicious
from the start,

but they just didn't have enough
information to hold him.

So they had to let him go.

But they want to keep an eye
on him,

and they'd actually like him
to take a polygraph.

He allows them to search his house
because if he says no,

that looks like he's got something
to hide.

Once they do search,

they find that her phone is there
and not with her.

The minute Victor got home,
which was actually in Marina,

my understanding is
he packed his belongings.

He was able to get a third party to
drive him down

to the border of Mexico,
and he disappeared.

So that tells me
he wasn't free and clear at all.

He was a suspect at that point.

When police realise Cabrera has
jumped the fence and left,

they know that he pretended he was
going to come for the polygraph

in order to delay them
and to put them off their guard.

He had such a lead on them

that he was able to get
into another country.

That same day,

they received a call from someone
who noticed a car that was parked

about a block away from the garage.

They ended up finding
Roshni Singh in a vehicle, her body,

in an apartment complex,
also in Monterey.

And that's when they realised
she had been strangled,

and it was a homicide investigation
at that point in time.

Because police would have
expected to be able to tell him,

to convey information,
"We did find the car,

and we found your girlfriend.
Unfortunately, she's dead."

And they would have expected him
to be wanting to know everything.

"Where did you find the car?
What happened to her?

How could this have happened?"
Instead, he's fled.

So his behaviour suggests he's part
of this. He's guilty of something.

Once the vehicle is found
and her body is inside,

we're not dealing with
an abduction anymore.

Now we're dealing with a murder.

When police go back

and start knocking on the door
of the parents' house

to look for him,
kind of clarify what's going on,

and now the parents
are uncooperative.

Again, to me,
that's another red flag,

because, why would
the parents be uncooperative?

Why would he not be there?
There's something else going on.

One of the breakthroughs in the
case is when the body is found

because by Cabrera's account,

his wife was abducted
in the early hours of the morning.

As soon as the body is found, there
will be a post mortem examination,

and that would reveal quite quickly
that Roshni has been dead longer

than Cabrera
has indicated in his account.

So that makes it
immediately suspicious.

Now, to determine time of death from
a body in the first 40 hours or so

is comparatively straightforward
and reasonably accurate.

A pathologist would have taken
the body temperature.

They would have looked at
a thing called lividity,

which is how the blood pools

by gravity to the lower parts
of the body.

And they would have
assessed rigor mortis.

Rigor mortis comes on slowly,
builds up

and then disappears
after two or three days.

So within that time,

a forensic pathologist
can be reasonably accurate

about the time of death.

And in this instance,

the pathologist came to the
conclusion that Roshni was dead

at the time when Cabrera described
she was abducted by the robbers.

In this particular case,
we have Victor,

who was remaining at the shop.
He remained at the shop,

but the car was still removed.

That means there's somebody else
that's involved

that we haven't known about yet.

Very clearly,
we have Victor as the number one,

but who's his co-defendant?

Who helped him out?

That becomes the problem now.

Once he's fled the scene
and the police are after him,

it is of the utmost importance
to find him.

Because if he gets too far away,

it can become increasingly difficult
to zero in on him.

Now, the case against him
has become much more serious...

because now we have a dead
body in a car,

and that murder and kidnapping

could land him in jail
for the rest of his life.

One of the things that's most
important in all of these cases

is what we call a victimology.

A victimology is a detailed
study of the victim...

...what was going on in their life at
the time, their overall background.

That's how we determine,

how in the world could this person
become a victim of a crime?

When they do the victimology

and they discovered this insurance
policy

that Victor would have collected on,

they have established their motive.

A monetary motive
is one of the most universal.

We find this all the time. So now we
have to go and find Victor,

because now
he's really the prime suspect.

It's bad enough looking for a
fugitive in one single country,

but he could literally be anywhere
in the world.

Victor went to Mexico,
probably believing he's untouchable,

but always looking over his shoulder

because he knows that at any time
he could be arrested.

The police now don't have
Victor in custody.

They don't know where he's gone.
He's fled.

He's probably gone to Mexico because
he does have relatives there.

When police spoke to witnesses
and people who knew Roshni,

they learned that there
had been money trouble.

There have been arguments. There was
some real problems between them,

which added to the idea
that he was involved

in something that happened to her.

One of the things in all crimes,
there's always a motive.

It's like, who could possibly
benefit from this event?

In this case,

they found that he took out an
insurance policy against her...

...and obviously was the beneficiary
if she died.

Police suspected there was
an accomplice

because of the way Cabrera
had been tied up.

And so they look through
his cell phone data

and find messages to a man
named Francisco.

And they believe that he is
the accomplice,

and they want to bring him in
because accomplices

are typically the weak link.

And under pressure, they might give
information that will help.

It is the case of Agaton-Hernandez,

one of two people
accused of killing Roshni Singh.

Hernandez is considered
the accomplice,

but still, he's on trial for murder.

They have the accomplice.
They brought him in, Francisco.

They're now going
to be looking for,

what's in it for the accomplice?

Why would they participate
in a murder and a staged robbery?

When you commit a crime
with another person

or assist another person,
you can be liable for murder,

even if the other person
does the murder.

So this becomes
a big bargaining chip

because murder for financial gain
is a special-circumstances crime,

and that can elevate a homicide
to a capital murder

where the death penalty
could be imposed.

Or in this case,
life without parole is mandatory.

When Francisco is arrested
and comes into the picture,

there's not more powerful evidence
against him,

but he's got more explaining
to do

because he is seen next
to the car where the body is found.

If he doesn't live near there,
why was he there?

The police will be very curious
about that.

They will also want his explanation
about all this,

and they will be
testing his explanation

against Cabrera's explanation.

And generally speaking,

these two accounts
will not mesh together.

There will be areas that will
provide the police with leverage,

and of course, the ultimate
leverage that they can use,

particularly in the United States,

is that they can say, "Well,

if you come clean about this,

you will get a better break
than your accomplice."

And they will pit the two accused
people against each other.

Sometimes they do not need
to put them against each other.

They actually
choose to go against each other.

And there are counter accusations.

Counter accusations like this
will kind of break the case

completely wide open, enable
the police to gather more evidence

that establish
that it's actually a homicide

that was planned by
these two people,

rather than an abduction
by these mysterious robbers.

When you go to the second suspect
and they starts giving information,

the most important thing
is is we always want to ask

this co-conspirator something that
only a co-conspirator would know,

because that's the one
that tells us this is our guy.

The autopsy report
had come in to show

that Roshni had been
murdered around midnight,

not during the time of the robbery.

So they can use that
to pressure Francisco

to confess up to the fact that he
was part of this plan

and that Cabrera
had wanted to kill Roshni

in order to get the insurance payout

and then stage the robbery

and kidnapping so that neither
of them would be implicated in it.

You have to be thinking
about Roshni in a very detached

and indifferent way.
She's just a pawn in their game,

and to them,
the payout is worth,

you know,
whatever risk they're taking.

She is a nobody to them.

She just the way
they can enrich themselves.

Agaton was originally
arrested for accessory,

but then prosecutors changed it
to murder

and conspiracy to commit murder.

The defence says
the charges don't add up.

I suspect that prosecutors needed
a little bit more evidence,

something more direct, and I'm quite
sure that they gave him a deal

in exchange for his testimony.
That's often how it happens.

A guilty verdict today in the murder

of a Marina mother
nearly three years ago.

Francisco Agaton-Hernandez
is one of two people

accused of killing Roshni Singh.

Today, a judge found him guilty.

Francisco is found guilty of being
an accomplice to murder and fraud,

and he gets a life sentence.

But they still don't have Victor.

There is no question anymore that
Victor is the one behind this,

and Victor is still gone.
Victor is nowhere to be found.

And so for the family,

they need the police to find him
as quickly as possible.

He does have to face what he did.

For the family of Roshni Singh,
they know who did this.

There's been one trial for the
accomplice. It's a done deal.

He's been found guilty.
He's talked about the plan,

but they don't have the perpetrator.

He's free. He's somewhere in Mexico,

and they may never get justice.

When somebody
is on the run like this, oftentimes,

once they get far enough away,

more and more people
have to be involved.

Once the logistics get more
and more complicated,

the harder it is to find them.

And so as this is snowballing

and they're looking and they're
getting more people involved,

it almost seems like it's getting
harder and harder.

Victor is still missing,
and the case goes cold.

Normally in cold cases,

you have a victim
with an unknown suspect.

This is an unusual situation because
they know who the suspect is,

but they just can't find him.

It will take a really intrepid
detective to track down Cabrera.

It really requires a detective
who sticks with it

and really follows each small lead.

One of the things that detectives
have is that it becomes

"This is my case." We say
we have ownership of this case.

"So I'm going to follow
it no matter where it goes

for as long as I'm working."
As a matter of fact,

we have had detectives that had
retired still come back to make sure

somebody is working that case
that they were working on.

They know who did it.

They just don't know how to get him
back and where he is.

California is a death penalty state.

So if he's fled to Mexico,

Mexico would have some restrictions
on sending him back.

As years pass,

Victor has the opportunity to
totally transform his life,

maybe change the way he looks,
get a totally different identity.

So many things he could be doing
throughout that time,

and simultaneously, Roshni's family,

you know, are losing hope.

As time goes by,

they realise
they may never find him.

If someone doesn't wanna be found,
that's really difficult these days.

With cameras everywhere and social
media and digital forensics,

it can be very difficult.

In 2015, I said, "Hey,

we have this old case here.

Victor Cabrera has been
on the run since 2008."

And so when I started formulating
a plan of, OK, well,

how can I apprehend this person?

And we didn't have any good intel,
or I should say information,

that let me know where
Victor was in Mexico.

It's why working in a team works
so well,

is because when you have a variety
of people looking at it

with different skills
and backgrounds,

sometimes people come
up with some ideas.

With a person on the run,

the longer they are gone
makes it more

and more difficult for them
to be found.

They could change appearances
drastically.

As more time goes by,
witnesses may move or pass away.

Evidence may go missing...

...and memories can fade.

You're getting further
and further away from your suspect.

Obviously, the biggest part is,
where is he?

Because if I don't know where he is,
then nothing else really matters.

He's going to be keeping
tabs on the news.

He's going to be keeping tabs
on the investigation.

He is going to find out
what police have done so far

through social media,
through news outlets.

Then he's going to realise
he is actively being sought after,

which will cause him
to go deeper underground.

We also kind of had to figure out,
who does he know down there?

Who does the family know in Mexico?

That could give us potential
areas of where he could be.

Someone who's staying on the run
is going to meet other people

and especially if he decides he's
going to start over again

and get a job and get into
relationships

and, you know,
maybe even have a family.

All of those people
are potential weak links.

Especially if he's hidden
what he has done

and the fact
that he's a wanted person.

They may just post his picture.

They may talk about him, you know,

without really realising they're
giving something to police

to track him down.

So each time he makes a connection
with people

or has a record of something,
like a job,

he's leaving himself open
to being found.

Roshni's family
have to live with the idea

that he might be getting
to have a great time,

getting to start a new relationship,

perhaps even inflict more pain
on another woman.

And just the idea that he's able
to do that

is something that plagues them.

Something too to understand
is the way Mexico works.

It's a lot different
than the United States.

Some people can be bribed and be
given money, and so they can

just walk out of police stations
and so forth if you have some money.

We figured out there was kind of a
general area where

he could potentially be...

...one of the big cities,
Guadalajara.

We knew that his brother
had some dealings down there.

We started our liaison with some
of the units down there.

Through that, we got another lead
that we were able to then figure out

who Victor's girlfriend was.

I was like, "OK, well, I'm not
going to look for Victor anymore.

I'm gonna start looking
for this girlfriend,"

cos in my mind, I was like,

girlfriend is going to be a
little bit more open about her life,

and I figure her communication
footprint is gonna be much larger

than Victor's would be.

And through her footprint,

we then got information
that she worked at a factory

right outside of Guadalajara.

And so we were able to get
some eyes on this factory.

And so the first problem
we had is this factory was huge.

It was, like,
a 10,000 employee type of place.

And so we're like, "Oh, gosh, how
are we going to find this person?

It's like a needle in a haystack."

So one thing we kind of lucked out
on is Victor was driving a vehicle

from Michoacan,
so he had different plates.

And so we did
some more surveillance,

ended up seeing a vehicle with
Michoacan plates in that location.

And that's when we were able to,
you know, first got our first eyes

on Victor Cabrera in the vehicle.

And so we knew he would come

and go pick up his girlfriend
from work every day.

And so we flew down to Guadalajara.

After ten years have gone by
since Victor committed this crime,

he was probably under the impression

that he was gonna get away with
this. It was all going to be fine.

He had started a new life.

They weren't going to find him.

The day of the actual arrest,

Victor Cabrera was driving,

and all the windows were blacked out
from what I recall.

And so we're sitting in
this big high rise,

and I'm excited because I'm like,
"Hey, we're going to do this.

We're going to get
Victor in custody."

Remember we saw the car.
He's headed towards the factory,

And they pulled him over,

and I was actually able to see him
getting taken into custody.

While he was taken into custody,
Victor, the whole time,

denied it was him. He was like,
"You have the wrong person.

My name is not Victor. I am not
the person you're looking for."

We were able to look at all
of his documentation he had on him,

and his driver's licence
and his Mexican identification card,

and everything had actually
a new identity on it.

So he had
very legitimate documentation

that was not under his name.

Once that occurred,

he was transported to the
immigration building in Guadalajara.

He still denied he was Victor.
Clearly was Victor Cabrera.

And so we ended up showing him
a photograph

of his California driver's licence.
And said, "Well, this is you."

And eventually he gave in and said,
"Yeah, that is me.

I am Victor Cabrera."

Mi nombre es Victor Cabrera.

Victor Cabrera was arrested Monday

after federal agents found him
living on the run in Guadalajara,

Mexico.

When Victor is finally found
and arrested,

there is a sense that now
he can be brought back.

Now there can be a trial or
some kind of plea deal,

that justice can finally
be done on this case.

Roshni's family finally
get that phone call

they've always been waiting for.
The police have located Victor.

They're extraditing him back
to the United States,

and they're finally going to get

that justice
they've been waiting for.

And so we then
I met him at the airport,

boarded a plane,
and we flew back to the US.

So I actually got to spend about
five-plus hours with Mr Cabrera.

It's a long ten years

with a lot of time wondering
if this will ever happen.

But finally, the case is done.

So here in California,
the first thing that happens is

he's brought in front of a judge,

and he's asked what his plea is.
In this case, he pled not guilty.

A not-guilty plea is not
uncommon in these types of cases

because saying not guilty is "You
don't have the evidence against me."

And during that time between his
not-guilty plea and his trial,

his attorneys will have time
to build a case,

build an investigation,
build a defence.

So by the time he gets to trial,

his attorneys
will be completely ready.

Most cases that go to court,

there is a package of evidence that,
direct or indirect,

points
to the guilt of an individual.

So they would be very careful

about getting a precise
account from Cabrera.

They would go over the story
many times

to establish whether there was any
contradictions or inaccuracies

or pull out detail
that he might have forgotten.

Once they have that account,

the question they have
in their mind is,

"Well, does that fit
with the rest of the findings?

Does that fit with what
we found at the crime scene?

Does that fit with his injuries?

Does it
fit with the pathological evidence?"

And in this instance, it doesn't.

And then
we went to trial in August of 2018.

Victor's finally at trial,

and he faces a 12-person jury,

who's going to determine
whether he's guilty or not.

In terms of the forensic

or the more technical evidence
that's presented in court,

the most powerful evidence
is from the highly experienced,

credible forensic pathologist.

So that is likely
to resonate strongly with the jury.

The other areas around the rope

and the lack of injuries to Cabrera.

Now these are more subjective,
but it may well be

that the pathologist would have got
involved in that as well

and commented that it's very unusual
for someone to be involved

in a fight or to be assaulted
and have no injuries whatsoever.

At the time, Victor
had a very good defence attorney

named Larry Biegel. And really,

in the system, you want the defence
attorney to do a good job

because it keeps the system fair.
They brought their defence.

We had our case to present.

And so, I think we let the facts
speak for themselves.

In this case,
the jury found him guilty of murder

with the special circumstance
of murder for financial gain.

And what that means is
he is not eligible for parole.

Special circumstances can elevate
a murder case

to a death penalty case or a case
of mandatory life without parole.

And in this case,
that's what he got.

Once there's a conviction,
there is great personal relief,

a lot of personal satisfaction,
because you've worked nights,

you've discounted your own family,

you've done things above and beyond

sometimes what's necessary
in order to bring this forward.

At the end of the day,
it's, you know,

what evidence was presented
that found him guilty?

I think it's the totality of it.

Lots of little pieces
that come together.

He's dialling a phone with his
tongue for 45 minutes

where he's barely tied up.
Does that make sense?

Right? It doesn't make sense.

Also, then
locating the crime scene in Marina.

I mean, that's kind of a big clue,

is if the crime scene
is not at this gas station

or in this vehicle,

that, really, the murder happened
in a whole nother location.

And it happens to be
the house where he's living.

It is as if Victor is overlooking
the fact

that the person he murdered
was a human being,

and he just saw dollar signs.

For me,
it's just something where it's,

try to feel good for the family.

I hope they feel that they get
some type of closure.

I'm not sure if you can ever
get any type of full closure.

But at least he's not
still running around and free.

That he's paying for what he did.

This is probably
Victor's first murder.

It's probably his first robbery,

but it's not ours, the cops.

We know what we're looking for,

but they don't know because
they've never actually done it.

He killed a mother.
He killed somebody's sister,

somebody's daughter.
That's terrible.

But these type of crimes,
it really affects a lot of people.

Not only does it affect family,

of course,
very much so, her son.

but also now the Cabreras
at the same time too.

They have to live with something
like that too.

There was this added element
to the fact

that Victor had tied himself up,

had staged this whole entire thing
to look like an abduction of Roshni,

and added a whole nother element
to this case

of having planned
this whole entire thing

and lost this beautiful life
over it.

Was justice done? I believe so.

Victor Cabrera, he's in prison.

I don't think he can hurt
anybody again, hopefully.

He's paying for his crime.

Roshni was such a beloved
member of her community,

family. So many people admired her,

and especially her ability to take
care of her son as a single mom.

And when it came out that Victor
had committed this crime for money,

something as small and paltry
as $600,000,

people just couldn't believe that
somebody was capable

of doing something so awful
for something so insignificant.

Subtitles by Sky Access Services