Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranรฎ)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
The thing inside of me, it's like...
the appetite, it's like a wolf that's...
feeling... the hunger.
On the surface, he seems to be a cleaned-up member of society.
He's clean-cut, looks like the boy next door.
And yet, if we just dig, not very hard,
we figure out this is someone who's gotten himself
in and out of trouble.
I think Moulton is somebody who engages in congenial ways
of interacting with people.
It's what we think of in psychopathic individuals
as superficial charm.
He's glib. He's easily relatable.
He talks to people in a friendly way.
And so he can pass in a very chameleon-like way.
He passes as somebody who's a law-abiding,
upstanding member of society when we know that his history
really doesn't support that.
By now, he could easily have just said, "I did this."
"Doesn't matter why I did it. I just did it."
But instead, he is trying to convince other people
that he's not such a bad guy
because it was all of these other
external influencers that were compelling him
to engage in this behavior.
But he was administering his steroids to himself.
He was using drugs himself.
He's just using these things as a way of explaining away
his behavior rather than taking responsibility.
It's just a tool. It's just a tactic.
He knows he's going to prison.
He just wants the least amount of time in it.
When Moulton introduces his son as a concept
in this interview, he's not being asked about his family.
What he's doing is what we call impression management.
Again, as he goes right up to the line with detectives
about this awful, sadistic crime he committed,
he's backpedaling and saying, "But I'm a nice guy."
Like, "You can trust me. I'm a family man."
There's a little bit of self-awareness there,
like where he said, "I had this void."
And that is probably a real reflection
of what he actually feels.
And this is something that has been said multiple times
about the way psychopaths feel when they're actually willing
to state their true feelings.
The void is from not feeling empathy.
If you don't feel close to any person,
'cause you can't feel love, imagine the void you would feel.
Certainly, Moulton would not be the first psychopath that
conveniently found God
as a way of helping to just cleanse themselves
and distance themselves from their actions.
It's a way of saying, "I did this horrific thing,
but you can't think of me as a horrific person,"
which is that image manipulation.
And if I take it and put it behind me on my terms,
I control the narrative,
I control the way this goes down,
and I can probably even control the consequences.
He's talking about squeezing the life out of Nicole,
that she just goes limp.
That is the one time that he's actually being descriptive
without prompting.
That was the piece that excited him the most.
His deviancy is about pushing life to its very limit.
It wasn't about anger.
It wasn't about these crimes-of-passion moments.
It was simply about satisfying and gratifying his own needs
and by taking the life of someone else.
When we look at the different categories of psychopathy,
there's always an element
of boundary crossing and antisociality.
But the sexual psychopath is a little bit different in that
the primary boundary that they're looking to cross
is the sexual boundary.
Other people can certainly achieve their full gratification
just through the act of strangulation itself,
but I think Moulton has progressed in his deviancy
where just doing the behavior isn't enough.
There's a lack of remorse and a shallow affect.
And this is what we're seeing in Moulton,
is that while on the surface it sounds like he's
taking responsibility for his actions
and he's also expressing some very pro-social attitudes,
you know, "I'm concerned for them
and the dangerous people that are out there,"
but if you listen closely to what he's saying,
he's actually blaming the victims.
They shouldn't be getting into cars with strangers,
not, "I shouldn't be out there preying on women."
I want people to understand that the psychopath
can feel fear,
and they can feel fear similar to those around them
who are not psychopaths.
They just can't read the fear from other people.
And so it is a feeling that is wholly unique,
and they're unable to truly deal with
and they mask it with anger and violence, right?
They mask it with drugs and alcohol.
The constant paranoia of having to look over your shoulder.
"Are the police gonna come arrest me now?"
All of these thoughts can kind of rattle in your head,
and maybe those things broke containment and escaped
their compartmentalization to the point where now he has
to reveal this kind of stuff.
The importance is exactly in the point she makes
that he's had a decade to think about this.
And you don't just develop empathy and remorse
over slow periods of time.
You either have it or you don't by the time you're in your 40s.
Empathy, conscience,
that sort of understanding of right versus wrong,
and the concept of consequences when you harm another
human being, most children develop before the age of five.
So if you don't have it by the time you're 10, 15,
20 years old,
you don't just wake up one day at 40 or 41,
pick up a religious text and, "aha," you have it.
The religion is nothing other than a convenient explanation
and a way of trying to minimize the consequences to himself.
For any of us, the reasonable question is,
why would you tell your child this?
It's a completely inappropriate topic to have.
But again, what you hear is, he's blaming
everyone but himself.
He's not taking responsibility for his actions.
And Moulton is in many ways a textbook narcissist.
He's focused on himself.
And his attempts to talk to his son about his crimes
are, again, about impression management.
He's explaining away his behavior.
He's not saying, "I didn't have sex with these women."
He's not challenging in his own head as a parent,
"I have a teenage son who's coming of age,
"and I'm communicating a lot of messages about sex,
sexuality, and how you treat the opposite gender."
But instead, he's just making it about himself.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.