Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Now we can start.
So, welcome Mr. Harari. Or may I say
Yuval?
Yuval is fine, perfectly.
Yuval, I'm honored and excited to have
the opportunity this evening to uh
to pick your brain, but also hopefully
to get to know you a little better. Um
get to know the man behind the books and
the lectures. And and I understand I'm
just in time. Mhm. Cuz before we started
this interview, you told me that coming
Sunday you're leaving for your your
annual off-the-grid retreat meditation.
Yeah. I'm going for 2 months meditation.
Yeah, but it's also 2 months of not
talking at all? Complete silent. I mean,
not talking to people and no phones and
no computers, no books, no writing, no
nothing. Yeah. Uh you know, to detoxify
the mind. Yes.
So, no talking. So, don't hold back now.
You can still You can still talk. You
get every opportunity in the next what?
90 minutes.
Um and without I mean, I I didn't want
to dive too deep right away into the
details of meditation cuz I hope we'll
Yeah, we'll get to that later.
We'll get to that later probably, but I
I did wonder what you miss the most when
you're away for those 60 days. Is it Is
it your husband? Yes. Oh, no no no. I
wanted I wanted to give you three
options.
Ah, okay. Okay. Pretty obvious.
that you said yes right away.
No, I wanted to say is it your husband,
your cell phone, or your dog? I don't
have a cell phone.
Uh it's it's definitely my husband. I
mean, my dog is currently he's 14 and he
has cancer and he seems to be in his
last days. So, it's it's really kind of
I hope it'll it'll it'll wait until I
come back from the meditation retreat.
He's doing well now. He's He's taking
these cannabis drops. I mean, he's not
taking it. We We are giving it to him.
Wait, you're giving weed to your dog?
Not weed. It's You know, it's the the
extract that the the medicinal oil.
dog or to your husband?
yeah. And he's not smoking, you know.
You're not rolling him joint. No. No.
And uh we we just kind of spray it on on
on on his food and he and it it really
improves his his condition.
Really? Uh it seems so. And there is no
placebo effect on these dogs. I I know.
That would be funny though. Placebo
effect in dogs that you're telling him
this really works and then he thinks,
"Yeah, you're right. Yeah." Yeah. Yeah.
So, 60 days of no talking.
Um and we are now we are We're setting
off on a journey through your head
basically and and and through your life.
And to do so, we've asked you to pick a
handful of uh movies, TV series that are
meaningful to you in one way or another.
And I happen to know that watching TV
series is one of the main hobbies of you
and your husband,
Yes.
right?
Yes.
are you typical binge watchers? No. I
mean, he tends to be more of a binge
type. I tend to be like, "Oh, we need to
digest this episode before we move to
the to the next one." So, there is often
a conversation around it. So, we often
end up watching two episodes in a row.
Okay, so not the whole season
No, no, no, no, no.
in one night. I mean, we just yesterday
night we watched the first episode of
Succession of the new Ooh, the new the
third season. It's amazing. I mean, it's
so good. It's like Shakespeare for the
21st century. I haven't gotten a chance
yet. I had to watch all the the the the
movies that you are about to discuss
this evening. Yeah. Um how about we take
a look at the first clip you selected.
It's an educational children's cartoon
series from late '70s.
I think even early '70s, yeah.
Early '70s. I watched it in the like
late '70s, early '80s when I was 4, 5
years old. Yeah.
And it kind of completely blew my mind.
Yeah, we were born in the same year,
1976.
'76.
'76.
Yeah. I also watched it as a kid. Mhm.
Um it's um I mean, when I watch it now,
I'm surprised again and again that some
of the things I write today in my books,
and I think that oh, this is something I
just thought about like today or or or
this year. And then I watch it, and I
know it was already there when I was
like 5 years old. It was on TV. You
basically plagiarized it. Yes.
Maybe consciously Unconsciously.
unconsciously
Yes. from your childhood because it's a
series about the history of humanity. Uh
it's originally French, entitled Il
était une fois l'Homme, which means Once
Upon a Time, Man. Um
why why why do you want to kick off with
it without
giving away the full story?
It it it inspired my my love of history.
Mhm.
And as I said, it really blew my mind
that you know, I mean to
as a kid trying to understand the world,
why is the world the way it is?
And then you watch it and it tells you
that the world wasn't always like this.
It was completely different.
And how things keep changing over time.
And I think it shaped to to large extent
my view of the world. And
it has I think I I I I don't know
it's difficult to put a number on it,
but I I credit it to some extent with my
becoming a historian. Wow.
So basically this is the origin of Yuval
Harari. As a historian, yes, as a
historian.
Wow. Once upon a time, man.
First of all, pretty harsh scene for a
vegan.
I wasn't vegan then. No, you're No, not
as a kid, obviously.
And well, then then the cat's out of the
bag. This is where you got your
information from. Millions of readers
all over the world wonder where does he
get his information from? At least some
of it. I mean, watching it now, I mean,
again, it's I mean, it's all sexist.
There are no women there. There's just
this one woman who does nothing
throughout the whole thing except
cooking.
They hand out the food.
out the food and that's it. Even Even in
the '70s, history was written by men.
Yes, still. Still. But But But still, I
mean, it's it's such a rich
show in
makes it so good for you?
You know, it it starts with evolution,
which, you know, growing up in in Israel
in the 1980s was not obvious. We still
don't really teach evolution in in in
school.
So, you know, watching this kind of a
powerful image or a powerful narrative
that sticks in the mind
and also, you know, the basic
understanding that humans are animals
that still most people reject.
Most people around the world today.
Yeah. And so, you were not taught that
as a young boy. No, I mean, we were
taught the Bible.
okay.
we I come from a secular family and I
went to a secular school, but still in a
secular school in Israel, you learn like
tons and tons of Bible. You don't learn
evolution. But you don't learn anything
about dinosaurs or fossils or
dinosaurs, kids like dinosaurs. You
probably hear about dinosaurs. But you
know, that the whole process of
evolution and where we human beings came
from and ancient human species, maybe it
was mentioned here and there, but you
get far more Bible
than that.
But but what did you think then when you
watched this? You like, "Wait a minute.
No one's telling me about this."
I'm not sure. I mean, you know, I mean,
the world is so complicated when you're
five. I mean, it's still complicated
even today. But you just to make sense
of it and you get so many different
points of views and stories that don't
really add up. So, it took me
many many years to integrate
the different narratives
that I heard from different places.
Yeah. And I also to discount some of
these narratives. Like to understand
that that the Bible is just it's not the
the history of humanity. It's just a
story that some humans invented 3,000
years ago and became extremely powerful
and and and successful, but it's it's
just a story.
And your parents did not at least did
not forbid you to watch
No, absolutely not. No, no. Again, I
came from a secular family. They were
very much in favor of of this. But um
again, you you go to school and and
until today, you learn mainly Israeli
history and Jewish history. You learn
Again, you learn an awful lot of Bible.
But, even in history class, it's mostly,
you know,
you don't learn anything about China.
You don't learn anything about, I don't
know, the agricultural revolution. You
learn something about the Roman Empire,
but mostly, what did the Romans do to
us?
And then you learn about the French
Revolution, it's mainly about what
happened to the Jews in the French
Revolution. So, um
But, every country has their tunnel
vision, right?
Yes, absolutely. I In lower school
school, I learned about, you know, how
great the East India Companies were,
right? Yeah. So, but this to you was a
source of proper information.
And especially
didn't realize it back then, but you
realized it later. Yes, it's kind of an
an alternative
understanding
of the world that with time became more
and more convincing and powerful and and
rich.
Yeah. And it's accurate, as I understand
you, correct? It's as accurate as an
animation series for for little kids can
be. Of course, it's not I mean, if you
go now to the latest findings, then no,
it's not 100% accurate. But, as an
initial view
of of evolution and history, it's it's
surprisingly good.
Sufficient. Yeah, and it raises some of
and
many cases In many cases, when you deal
with with kind of these big narratives,
the real question is, what are the
questions?
That okay, the answers that are being
given, they are corrected over time. You
have new archaeological findings and new
historical theories and so forth. That,
you know, people in the '70s didn't know
that Neanderthals and Homo sapiens had
sex and even had children together. They
thought they were two different
they were two different species and then
the Neanderthals disappeared and this is
what you see in in in in in the episode.
Now we know from genetic evidence that
yes, something like 50,000 years ago
some Neanderthals had sex with some
sapiens and most of us have some
Neanderthal DNA. It's like 2%.
2% 3% percent something like that.
Yeah. Now because I wanted to to quote
something from this particular episode
because the voice over says "Chances are
slim Cro-Magnon men descended from
Neanderthal men
since the two lived side by side for
5,000 years. Cousin or conqueror,
Cro-Magnon men did win out in the end."
So well obviously now we don't we don't
call it Cro-Magnon men. Yeah, I mean
anymore. The the the terminology
changes, some of the details change, but
what I said is is again, the questions
are the important ones. Yeah. Does Does
this clip give us any clues on why we
came to conquer the planet?
First of all again, it it ask the
question. Why did our species of humans
conquer the planet?
Yeah. Which is a very important
question. First of all to realize that
they were different species
and secondly to
this basic question of why we dominate
the planet. Yeah. We get different
answers to it. But do we get an answer
in this scene you think?
Yes and it's it's basically still the
answer that I give in Sapiens that it's
cooperation. You have the scene when
there is the mammoth
group the the group of mammoth One
spotted and the bands join together in
order to cooperate to hunt the mammoth
and this is also the the the answer that
I give in Sapiens that the real secret
of success of our species, our source of
power is not that we are individually
smarter or more creative, nothing like
that. It's that we are the only mammals
that are capable of cooperation in large
numbers. You know, chimpanzees and and
elephants and and wolves and dogs, they
can cooperate in small numbers. They
They are in packs. Yeah. So, the
chimpanzees can cooperate say 50
chimpanzees, a hundred chimpanzees,
because cooperation among them depends
on intimately knowing each other.
Chimpanzees also hunt, but to go hunting
with you, I need to know you personally.
What kind of chimpanzee are you? Are you
nice? Can I trust you? Now, the the
thing about Homo sapiens, we have this
amazing ability to cooperate with
complete strangers.
And this is why we can cooperate
basically in unlimited numbers. If you
look at the world today, so at least in
the economic sphere, we have a network
of cooperation of almost 8 billion
people. Like this shirt that I'm
wearing, it was produced by somebody in
Vietnam or Guatemala that I've never
met. But this network of cooperation
brings me my shirt. Yeah. And this goes
back to
uh uh of thousands of years ago
when sapiens first acquired this ability
to cooperate in in large numbers. And
this is our This is why we managed to
uh uh push aside or exterminate the
Neanderthals.
That We actually Neanderthals had bigger
brains than us. And individually, they
were physically probably more powerful.
And also intellectually, there are
reasons to think that they were not
inferior to us. But they did not
cooperate as well. As far as we know,
they couldn't They cooperate on on the
level of bands of say again 20, 15
Neanderthals. Sapiens could cooperate in
hundreds and thousands. And it doesn't
just mean that, you know, this image of
a big battle that a thousand sapiens
versus 15 Neanderthals. It's much more
than that. It's networks of exchanging
information, exchanging ideas. If you
discover a new herb that can cure an
illness, then you tell it to all the
other bands in in the area. And if
somebody discovers a new method to to
produce a knife or to hunt a mammoth or
anything else.
of mouth-to-mouth advertising.
Exactly. And and this is the the the
deep source of of our power, the ability
to cooperate in very large numbers.
Yeah.
It's funny how you mentioned the word
battle.
Cuz I
I want to suggest we go
to the next clip. As a historian, you
initially specialized in medieval
military history. Yeah. More
specifically, logistics.
Logistics, yeah. I was like my like my
my master's thesis was like the most
boring thing in the world. It was about
medieval logistical systems of how do
you feed an army on the march, how many
calories does a does a medieval knight
consume, and how much fodder each horse
eats, and where do you get the fodder?
And like if you go on a campaign and you
need to bring fodder for the horses. So
you you have a cart and you put the
fodder in it, but then you need horses
to pull the cart.
For something boring, you make it sound
pretty exciting. It's you know, I worked
on it for like 2 years. Um
in this regard, you want us to show
a military battle. Yes. From the HBO
series Game of Thrones.
I'm not even going to try to explain
who's fighting whom.
If you didn't see the show,
it doesn't I watched all the episodes
cuz I'm a fan, but even I I mean get
frustrated sometimes by keeping you
know, track of who's who and who's
belling who's trying to kill whom, etc.
All you need to know or all
the viewer needs to know is that there's
the one guy, the handsome Jon Snow. He's
talking to some other guy. He's the
leader of the moral
The wildlings.
Scots, basically, who live on the north
beyond the an anarchistic
uh
and then some other, you know,
power-driven king barges in and and
tries to take over.
Game of Thrones.
Why did you take us to the continent of
Westeros and particularly to this scene?
Well, I mean
as I said originally, I specialized in
medieval military history. Mhm. And even
more specifically in logistics. And then
I I watch this and I live I I like Game
of Thrones very much, but I I I I I sit
and cringe, you know, because I this is
so
unscientific. What you see here is
they're in the middle of nowhere,
somewhere in the frozen north, and
suddenly out of nowhere appears this
huge army of Stannis Baratheon
and surprises them.
And this is just absolutely impossible.
I mean, I'm I'm watching it and I'm
thinking, "How did they supply the
horses? Where did they get the fodder?"
It's The food, yeah. The food for the
horses, for the men. Usually in a
medieval army, the the the the most
common way is to just rob the the
villages.
You you pass through a country and you
just take the the the the bread, the
chickens, the eggs, the fodder to feed
your army. But there are no villages.
They are in the frozen north. So, the
other in in this situation, what
medieval armies do is you bring a supply
train with you. But the supply train is
very slow.
And it's, you know, it's it's pulled by
oxen and and and by by by horses and and
things like that. It's very difficult to
move a huge army through this kind of of
territory. They've never been there.
So, they they shouldn't they don't know
the land. And if they try to move a huge
army with its supply train, there is no
way that the native wildlings would have
missed it.
I mean, how can they be surprised? They
sure It's all
on the couch watching your favorite
series and then cringing because it's
not accurate. Is that correct? Uh in a
way because it's something that is very
close to home, medieval logistics.
I get it, but it's like watching the
Muppet Show and then getting angry
because frogs can't actually talk. No,
but but but it's it's kind of, you know,
to it it conveys a
deeply wrong view of, I mean,
what people often don't understand about
history is the logistics. Mhm. It's how
complicated it is to do simple things
like move an army.
And this is for instance what feeds into
conspiracy theories.
You know, the biggest problem with
conspiracy theories is that they
underestimate the complexity of the
world. Like they imagine that you can
control the world by, you know, you get
a bunch of billionaires sitting in and
around a table like this.
Yes, if you watch Shield and Hydra.
Yeah, and and and they release epidemics
and they start wars and the logistics
doesn't work.
No. Because yes, you can start a war,
there is no way you can predict the
outcome.
Uh you know, a real conspiracy is
something like the American invasion of
Iraq.
That went completely off the tracks.
Because there were no weapons of mass
destruction.
No, not just that. I mean, you have the
biggest superpower in the world invading
this third
third rate country
and it goes completely in an unexpected
direction. The country which probably
benefited most from the American
invasion is Iran. Yes, in this case.
how it really happens in history because
on the ground things get messy.
And the plans you make in your head, oh,
we land in the port and we I'll I'll
I'll move my huge army over the frozen
ice and surprise them, it just doesn't
work in in practice because oh, but what
we the horses don't have enough to eat.
Yeah, and therefore you do accept the
fact that there's actually ice zombies
and dragons. I don't like the ice
zombies and dragons, but I you know, but
that's okay. So this is kind of this is
the the the the their stick. The let
there be ice zombies, but um But at
least have a a proper
you know, view on or a proper display of
how armies move and Yes, because this is
something
for me which is more basic
to understand the complexity of
historical processes
and it has a bearing on how people
understand events today. But you know,
with zombies people see it on television
and hopefully they know that there are
no zombies.
But when they see the movement of
armies, they tend to think well, this is
this is much more accurate than zombies
and they they
they kind of use this to understand how
military events actually happen in the
world whether in the Middle Ages or or
today. And this distorts our
understanding of history. It is
portrayed or it is described as a
medieval it's said in medieval times or
it has this medieval Yes, feel.
Absolutely.
feel. That's that's what I was looking
for. But what what makes it medieval?
The castles and the swords and you know,
the technology is basically medieval,
the outlook or the kind of chivalrous
culture and you have kings and you know,
and certainly in Europe when you think
in terms of of an ill-defined time or
legend time or primordial time, it's
always the Middle Ages.
If you even you think about the Smurfs,
the Smurfs are basically in the Middle
Ages.
They they live in the village and there
is the nobleman in the castle and If I
was writing an article, this would be
the headline. The Smurfs are actually in
No, but I think this is this is well
known. You know, because you don't see
Greek a Greek city with all kinds of
elections and the forum and then no.
Usually legend time is the Middle Ages.
That is so funny. Never realized that.
Because most of our legends and and
except for you know, for for the Bible
and stuff, they come from the Middle
Ages. So
storytelling for us too as well.
Yeah, all all the children's fairy
tales, they're about princesses and
princes, not about consuls and praetors.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Let's move on to another fairy tale.
Money. The biggest of them all.
Um The Big Short, the true story about
how the financial crisis of 2007-2008
was triggered by the United States
housing bubble.
Um One unique aspect of this film is
that some actors will break the
so-called fourth wall
to directly address the audience and
explain complicated financial products
um such as um what's it called? CDOs,
CDUs, something like that. Synthetic
CDOs. Hm.
Uh disconcerting to say the least.
Um This guy, the investment advisor,
says society values me very much. How
come people put so much faith and money
into
in
into an obvious pipe dream?
Well, that's the basis of of the whole
of history, of the whole of society.
When we talked earlier about how we
ruled the world and not the
Neanderthals, because we can cooperate
in very large numbers. Yes. Including
with complete strangers, like the people
who made this shirt.
Now, the next question is what makes it
possible? What How come we can do it and
the chimpanzees can't?
And the answer is stories.
Uh fictional stories at the basis of
every large-scale corporation, there is
a fictional story. Now, it's very clear
in the case of religions that, you know,
a billion people can cooperate and build
cathedrals and synagogues or or go on on
crusades and jihads because they all
believe the same fictional story that if
you die in this holy war, after you die,
you go to heaven and How many virgins do
you want?
Yeah, and you know, for millions of
years you will enjoy all the best
things. No chimpanzee will ever believe
that. You can't convince a group of
chimpanzees to go fight another group of
chimpanzees by telling them, "Yeah, you
know, if you die, you get to chimpanzee
heaven and there you have lots and lots
of bananas and coconuts and whatever you
want." No chimpanzee will believe that.
In the same way I cannot convince a
chimpanzee to give me all his bananas
and say for a piece of paper.
week you get
the double the bananas.
Not in a week. No. Right now, I'll give
you this green piece of paper if you
give me your banana. Yeah.
No chimpanzee will agree. No. But humans
agree to it. This is why we can have
trade networks. This is why I can wear a
shirt that somebody on the other side of
the world has produced.
Because we all believe, I mean, the
greatest story ever told is not the
Bible, it's not about gods, it's not No,
the greatest story ever told is money.
You know, the the the biggest Nobel
Prize in literature that should be
awarded is not to the people who write
books, it's to the people who create
money.
It's the only story everybody believes.
Do we know who
invented
Well,
money? First of all, we need to
understand what what money is and and
and this it's a wonderful way that they
presented it. Money
people think that money is is
materialistic. You know, it's kind of
matter, it's it's But money is actually
one of the most
spiritual or mental things in the world.
It doesn't exist anywhere except in our
imagination, in our mind. It's
completely non-materialistic
and it's actually made of trust. You
know, the equation basically is money
equals trust. The things you make money
out of is trust. So, initially
there wasn't a lot of trust between
people, between strangers. So, the first
type of money that we know about for
sure was created in ancient Mesopotamia
around 5,000 years ago. And it was just
barley. Grain. Oh, barley. Yeah.
Grain. Grain.
Um food. Okay, food. And this was the
first money because people didn't trust
each other enough or the system. So, the
money was something you can actually
eat. Yeah, makes sense.
If Yeah, I mean if there is in I don't
know, like the the the global financial
meltdown, okay, I have my barley, I'll
eat it.
Um but then the next stage was gold.
And the amazing thing about gold, gold
has absolutely no value whatsoever. You
can't eat it. You can't eat it.
You can't eat it.
Uh you can't make useful things from it.
You know, iron, you can make an axe. You
can make a plow. You can make a knife.
Gold is a very soft metal. It's not good
for any of these things. The only thing
you make of it is status symbols like
crowns and jewelry and and and and and
statues of your gods. And money.
So, it's putting your trust not in the
gold
but actually in other people because the
value of the coin comes from the fact
that other people also value it.
And then it moved to paper.
That oh well, why do we need this this
cumbersome gold? You can just shift to
paper.
yeah. Yeah, it's it's much easier and
it's the same principle. The the the
value of the pay It has no value in
itself. It's just if everybody believes
the story that the the the bankers come
and tell us, So now this green piece of
paper, it's worth a banana.
If you believe it and I believe it and
the people in the supermarket believe
it, it works. I can go to the
supermarket, give this worthless piece
of paper and get a banana.
And then it moved to the next stage,
which is digital. Most money today in
the world is not even paper. If you take
all the papers and coins, it's less than
10%.
It's only
basically data in computers being moved
around. Like how did this shirt get to
me? I moved some bits in a computer from
this file to that file.
You ordered it online and Yeah, and then
the people got paid and digitally. And
you know, during the the current crisis,
governments have have have created
trillions, not millions, trillions of
euros and yens and and dollars. And how
do they do it? It's not like in the
1920s that you have printing presses
working all day. No, you did the the the
the president just goes to this guy and
tells him, "Okay, go into the file in
the computer
and whatever it's written, I don't know,
five trillion, delete the five and write
six." And that's it. And that's also
what we see happening in The Big Short,
right? There is a myth and then we start
piling up other myths on top of it.
They they creating money out of nothing
just by this kind of system of trust,
which most of the time works until it
doesn't.
Yeah. And we were watching the clip and
then you also said to me like this was
actually the first time I understood
Yeah. what they What is a synthetic CDO?
It brought down the global economy.
There was another scene in The Big Short
that struck me and because we discussed
earlier
this evening how you were you were
brought up in a more secular family,
right? But the school you went to was
you had there was Bible study.
was also a secular school.
a secular school, but the Bible was very
present.
was everywhere. Yeah, cuz there's a
scene in The Big Short that
where the the rabbi complains to we saw
Steven Carell also in this scene. His
character is Mark Baum. And then the
rabbi complains to Mark Baum's mother
that Mark Baum as a young boy is trying
to find inconsistencies in the word of
God.
I I mean, does it sound familiar to you?
Is that something you did as a boy?
Um
Yes, I mean, I it's I mean, from quite
an early age I understood that
the the Bible was not exactly the the
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth. I remember it was when I was
like 6 or 7 and I was asked maybe it was
in class, maybe it was by some family
gathering. I mean, who who who was the
first the first person, the first
people? Mhm. And the person expected I
would say Adam and Eve because this is
what we learned in in in school in in in
Bible. And I said Peking Man because I
just read that about, you know, this was
back in the in in the '80s and I just
read this, I don't know, this book that
said that that discussed Peking Man.
And then the archaeological finding from
China that was like 1.7 million or 1.5
million years old. And then I know that
it's much older than Adam and Eve, of
course.
So, what was the response of your
teacher?
Um they they were actually quite amused.
Really? Yeah, they they I mean, the
amount of Bible we got is nothing in
comparison to what you get in a
religious school. In an Orthodox In an
Orthodox school. Yeah.
I get it. Yeah. But still, I mean, you
grew up in Israel, history-laden
country. Too much history. Too much
history.
It's a It's a country suffering from
from far too much history.
Yeah. And and And you were a teenager
during the First Intifada, right? That
was like 1987.
In 1980 December '87.
Went on for 5, 6 years and and and your
father worked as a He worked as a in in
an arms In the in the weapons industry
like I don't know like I don't know like
a quarter of Israelis are working in the
weapons industry or something.
Yeah. So, but but how did these things
influence you back then?
I was very much interested in military
history. Again, this was my my expertise
in university at first was medieval
military history and the crusades and
things like that.
Yeah. Um so, uh But did you think it
influenced your choice of studies, for
example?
The the the focus on on military issues,
yes, very much so.
Uh and it's kind of grounds you
You know, I guess if I grew up in the
Netherlands, I would have a very
different view of the world. If you grew
up in the Middle East, uh you you you
tend to kind of
have um a darker view
of of humanity and of human history
because the the the violence and the
cruelty and also the stupidity is is all
around you. It's on your doorstep.
Yeah. You know, people killing each
other
over, you know, not over food, which
makes sense in some way,
but over fictional stories that that
other people invented. You know, I I I I
I I teach in Jerusalem,
one of the most famous cities in the
world, and you go around Jerusalem and
it's, you know, it's just a regular
place. You have stones and you have
trees and you have dogs and cats and
cars. It's it's just an ordinary place.
But then in their minds,
people create a second layer of reality
and superimpose it on top of the stones
and trees and and and cars, and they
walk around and they see angels and
demons and paradise and hell and all
these things,
and uh they they live in in this second
reality. I mean, one of the clips that
we thought of showing and we didn't show
in the end is is the Matrix. Mhm. Uh but
this kind of futuristic idea that people
will live inside a virtual reality
sometime in the future when AI and
computers will become over developed,
but people have been living in virtual
realities for thousands of years.
Everything around us is basically
virtual reality in a way. Yes, again,
there is the physical reality, of
course, of the stones and the trees and
the animals, but on top of that, we
impose
uh our fictions, our our our virtual
realities, our inventions. Whether it's
money or whether it's nations or whether
it's all these religious mythologies,
and most of the time what we see and
what kind of moves us
is the is the virtual reality. It's not
real.
If the coral reefs
or or or the Amazon rainforest, which is
this amazing creation of of nature which
took millions of years to create and
which really sustains our life, if this
gets destroyed,
people basically do nothing.
But if some, I don't know, the Western
Wall or Al-Aqsa Mosque or some other of
these, you know, buildings that we built
uh just, you know, 1,000 or 2,000 years
ago
and which are not really necessary for
our existence, if somebody would touch
one stone there,
you will all all hell will break loose.
And what does that prove?
That fictions are far more powerful
than reality
in
shaping
uh human history and politics and
economics. In the competition between
fiction and truth,
fiction, at least politically, usually
wins because the truth is just too
painful and too complicated.
And we don't only come up with fictional
stories about the world around us. Um We
also create them within ourselves. Yes.
And to illustrate this, you wanted to
show
another animated
clip. This time from a Disney Pixar
movie, Inside Out. Um A really a
wonderful, one of the best movies I've
ever Yeah, it's such a good
Very like at the very top of of my list.
It's about a girl named Riley and we're
starting at the beginning of the story
right after Riley's birth. Is there Do
we need any more context? Anything we
need to know?
It's I would say it's kind of taking
everything Disney has done previously
and just tears it to bits and throws it
away and here is a completely different
way to understand humanity.
Let's have a look.
One of your favorites. Yes. Yeah, but in
in 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, you
you write about Inside Out. Most viewers
might well have missed both its
neurological meaning and its sinister
implications. What are these sinister
implications? It basically says, you
know, most Disney movies, they tell you
look inside yourself and you'll find
your authentic true core and who you
really are and things like that. Follow
your heart.
Follow your heart and and all these
advices and here you look inside and you
realize that Riley is basically just a
big robot
controlled by not a single spark like a
soul or a spirit, but by a very
complicated neurobiological mechanism
which doesn't have a single self or a
single core. You have all these
different and sometimes con- conflicting
forces which are personified here as joy
and sadness and disgust and the fear,
but basically and and you know that the
movie that it just starts. It things
gets complicated, there is a problem and
and they they go to basically explore
Riley's brain. What's happening in
there?
And they never discover a core self.
They just discover more and more
complicated biological mechanisms.
And the implications, you know, they
they are shattering. That first of all
that you have no idea what's happening
inside.
And secondly, that as you explore, you
realize that there isn't just a single
self.
There is a a whole bunch of conflicting
forces and mechanisms.
Which is very much in line with what
modern science tells us.
But something that most humans refuse to
accept and certainly most Disney movies
don't give you that impression. So that
that's what's amazed you that all of a
sudden Disney
turned around a corner and
Like something gave us a different view.
Yes. And you know, I mean Disney's is
not so important. The the importance is
that this is suddenly a new view that is
being given to kids
about who they are and what makes them
function. Yeah, there is no little Riley
inside Riley and that's what you would
have
expected.
Exactly. And when when you first see it,
like the very first seconds, you think
that okay, joy is Riley's soul. Yeah.
But then you realize no, joy isn't
Riley's soul. Joy is just one element.
One of the captains in the mothership.
Exactly.
And um And so Riley also Mhm. her it's
Riley does not
um have one little Riley inside of her
telling what she wants or what she needs
or
it also said something about free will,
I guess. Um, you you never get any sense
of free will. No.
the Riley is just being controlled by
the conflict between these forces inside
her.
keep changing.
keep changing. And a very crucial
message of the movie is that none of
them is the real Riley. Again, the whole
problem, I don't want to ruin the movie
for those who didn't see it, but the
whole problem is that Joy thinks that
she is the real Riley and sadness
uh she's an intruder or something.
Mhm. And the kind of uh uh
big epiphany of the movie is to realize
no, Joy isn't Riley. It's all these
forces together that shape and control
Riley.
The idea of giving up a soul or a self
or
free will. I mean, that's you you
already mentioned for for many people
that's that's very hard. I mean, what's
left for us as humans if we have to give
up the idea of the self of the free
will. To explore the the reality. I
mean,
you know, my main problem is with with
the idea of free will and the self, it
makes us extremely incurious about
ourself. If my decisions just reflect my
free will, whatever that is,
then there is nothing to explore. Why
did I choose to agree to do this show?
Why did I choose this shirt? Why did I
choose this movie? Oh, it's my free
will, end of story.
But once you give up the the this
assumption,
you start really investigating what are
the many causes or or processes The
roads towards.
that shape exactly that shape our
desires. Where do they come like the
next thought that comes up in in my
mind? Where did it come from? Why this
thought? Now, I think we've arrived at
the chapter of meditation here as well,
right? Is that the the how you do it?
Mhm. But if we stick to the metaphor
the Inside Out metaphor and we so we we
take a look inside your head in in a
Disney way.
There's then Joy who loves watching
with her husband and then there is Anger
who's angry at what? Animal cruelty and
then there's Disgust disgusted at the
historical inaccuracies in Game of
Thrones.
Um what do these characters do when you
meditate?
They do their thing. I mean meditation
is not about trying to control them or
stop them. It's about just, you know,
observing what's happening.
But who's observing them then at that
That that's the classical question.
Um nobody's really observing them. It's
just a process of observation. There
isn't a self standing aside. There is
just a whatever is
is is a process not an entity. Now,
there is no point in kind of trying to
get too much philosophical or whatever.
It's it's all about the experience. When
when I went for the first time to
meditation retreat, the instruction was
extremely simple at first. Just just
feel the breath coming into your
nostrils and going out of your nostrils.
That's it. Just do that. Whenever your
mind wanders away, just bring it back.
And I couldn't do it for more than 10 10
seconds. And you know, 10 seconds
the mind goes somewhere. It takes me 5
minutes to realize I lost touch with the
breath and then bring it back.
And that's something you can train. And
this gets better over time, but that's
not the point. The point is you realize
something very very important about
yourself that you have no control or
very little control over the mind and
that you don't really understand what's
happening there. That's the really
shocking thing. But you created a
meditation for handling fame and
adoration.
Uh how how does sitting still for 2
hours a day and and breathing contribute
to not becoming a self-righteous
douchebag with a guru complex?
Which you're not, obviously.
Um, I hope not.
I hope not. I don't know. Because, you
know, and
it's
the the better you get to know your
mind,
it's much of it is about getting to know
your own weaknesses and getting to know
the stories that keep repeating in your
mind. You know, like a nation has a
national mythology and a religion has a
religious mythology. Each person has
personal personal mythology. Who am I?
Where did I come from? What are my
strength and weaknesses and whatever?
And usually it's just a mythology.
And I'll leave it
putting you on a pedestal is one of
those mythologies. Is that what you're
saying? Or It It could become very easy
I mean, we like our myth to be
flattering. And what's more flattering
than, you know, all these people telling
you that you're so smart and that that
you're like this and you're like that.
It you know, it immediately goes to the
head.
And if if you don't have a kind if if
you don't really make the effort to
observe what's happening inside, very
easily you create a temple of yourself
in your mind and you put a statue of
yourself like this
beautiful garden in in in the mind and
you get so much attached to it. And then
the moment somebody criticizes you in
some I don't know, TV show or in some
newspaper or in in in in a blog, you you
get so upset. How can they criticize?
I'm such an important person and I do so
many good How How do they dare criticize
me? And this is because you became
attached to this mythology
that that that you created in your mind.
Yes, you created it with materials from
outside. We always do that. But, does it
still affect you, criticism? Or not at
all? Yes, it does. Yeah, a lot, right?
Obviously, I'm human. I I meditation is
not a magic No. I mean, that's that's
the point about meditation. People think
that meditation is about getting rid of
stuff. The stuff I don't like about
myself, whether it's my anger or whether
it's my uh irritation or or selfishness
or whatever, I'll get rid of it.
And yes,
things change, but the really key the
the the really important thing is not to
get rid of stuff, is to get to know
yourself better. And especially to get
to know the stuff you don't like about
yourself, because it's easy to get to
know We all know the stuff we like about
ourselves. Uh let's move on to the
obvious next question, namely
if humans are computers, cuz you just
called Riley a a computer, can computers
become humans?
And yeah, and what does that even mean?
Uh the answer might be in the next
movie, Her. Um the story is set in the
near future, where the main character is
lonely and he falls in love with his
operating system called Samantha. Kind
of like a sexy Siri or a sexy Alexa in
Her.
Yeah, she said
this is an AI and Yes. she it says that
she's embarrassed. Mhm.
Um is she really and what would that
imply?
Uh there's so much to unpack in in this
scene. It's it's just amazing. Um
No let let let Maybe let's start
somewhere else. I mean Sure.
As a historian, I'm interested in the
past but also in the future.
Even the distant future, because it's
it's part of our identity. What makes
who we are is not just the past, it's
also the future.
And I have this very strong sense that,
you know, we have
deep down we are much
we are not just, you know, belong to a
nation or religion. All these things are
very shallow. Religions, nations, all of
them are just, you know, like 5,000
years old. Mhm.
And much more deep is our biological
identity, which we saw with with with
Riley. All these emotions
and and the body, they go back not 5,000
years. They go back tens of millions of
years. Like the the love between a
mother and a child, this is something
that's been around for hundreds of
millions of years. The breath, which we
talked about earlier, is hundreds of
millions of years. I still share that
with with reptiles.
I I I you breathe, I breathe. We we are
the same thing.
And then I look to the future and maybe
in a couple of decades, Earth will be
populated or even dominated by entities
that are not organic.
That they don't breathe. They don't have
emotions. Like the the potential of AI
is much much bigger than any historical
revolution. It's really a biological
revolution. Since the you know, for 4
billion years, all of life was organic.
And this is at least an an idea of
inorganic life forms. That's the biggest
thing that happened on Earth in 4
billion years. And it might happen in
our lifetime. Now, the biggest question
when it comes to AI would AI is
artificial intelligence. Yes. And the
big question is, will it have
consciousness, emotions, feelings? The
difference between intelligence and
consciousness is Intelligence is the
ability to solve problems.
Whether it's playing chess or diagnosing
a disease or a math problem.
Consciousness is the ability
That's That's intelligence. Mhm.
Consciousness is the ability to feel
things. Like love and hate and pain and
pleasure. Yes. Now, in humans and other
animals, they go together. We solve
problems by having feelings.
Computers so far, they have more and
more intelligence, but zero
consciousness. When a computer beats you
me in chess, the computer doesn't feel
happy. No, and he calculated all the
moves.
Yeah. So, it's a completely different
kind of intelligence. Now, nobody knows
there is a
maybe the biggest question about the the
the future is whether
we will have super intelligent beings
without any consciousness dominating the
planet, or whether we will have Or maybe
artificial consciousness.
Yes. Like we saw in in in here. Cuz
that's why I asked the question about
about her about Samantha being
embarrassed cuz that's such a thing of
the conscience. Yes, now we don't know.
We There is It's possible. I mean, there
is no scientific reason why
consciousness must be limited to organic
biochemistry and carbon-based life forms
and can't exist in silicon-based life
forms. Cuz we're also little computers
ourselves. We're just in a bio
mechanical
yeah. But so far, we don't see any
artificial consciousness. I mean, most
science fiction movies about AI are not
about AI. They are about AC, artificial
consciousness. The moment every movie
focuses on is the moment the computer or
the robot gains consciousness and then
either the the the the man falls in love
with the computer or the computer falls
in love with the human or they try to
kill each other or something like that.
Yeah, they take over the planet and then
kill all the Yes, but the So far, it's
science fiction. There is no indication
that computers are developing
consciousness.
At present, a far more frightening
scenario is that we will have super
intelligence without consciousness, the
same way that airplanes fly faster than
birds without developing feathers. So,
computers will become more intelligent
than us, far more intelligent without
having any feelings, any emotions
and they will dominate.
Is there a difference between a
Darwinian evolution and the AI
evolution? Yes, first of all Darwinian
evolution until today was organic. Yeah.
And this is not organic. But And also
Darwinian evolution is evolution by
natural selection. Here we have
intelligent design.
Yeah. So not the intelligent design of
the creationists in the Bible, a real
intelligent design. We are designing the
AI and then the AI will design maybe the
next generation of AI. So it's a
completely different kind of process.
But
if
if AI is taking over
um
No, let me let me rephrase this
question. I'm a human. I am a conscious
human being. We still don't know if AI
will have a conscience.
Yes. Um besides that, but like Riley,
I'm driven by joy, anger, fear, and
that's what motivates me. So what
motivates then an AI if it's not
controlled by humans? It develops its
own maybe non-conscious motivation. It's
it you know, AI is machine learning. You
don't program it. You build the basic
thing and then it learns.
Self-learning. It's it's learns and it
develops and you don't understand. You
know, it's it's it's it's very practical
today when you apply to the bank for a
loan and the bank basically lets an
algorithm decide your fate and it and
and the algorithm says no, don't give
this lady a loan and you ask the bank
why not? What's wrong with me?
Is it my face? Is it my
Yeah, is it my my the gender, the race,
whatever. The bank says we don't know.
The algorithm said no and we don't
understand even the people who designed
the algorithm don't understand the
decision that it is making and what even
more kind of frightening is as we saw in
in this clip it
it it's on the verge of having the
ability to hack human beings.
I mean if Riley is this kind of
spiritual self with free will, computers
can't hack us, can't understand us. But
we if we are basically a very complex
biological process,
then with enough data
and enough computing power, we are very
close to the point when computers can
hack human beings, can understand my
emotions, my likes, and my dislikes
better than me. Not perfect. You can
never hack something 100%. You don't
need 100%. You just need to know people
better than they know themselves, and
this is quite easy because most people
don't know themselves very well. So,
just imagine what happens when we pass
as the algorithm knows what I want
better than I than I know it.
You're a puppet. It can manipulate you.
It can press your emotional buttons. And
this is what is happening now with our
smartphones and all these, you know,
algorithms on social media.
why you don't have a smartphone?
Uh that's one of No, that's one of the
reasons. But basically, it's it's to
keep my my time. And you know,
over the last 20 years, the most the
smartest people in the world and the
best technology in the world has been
working on the problem of how to hack
human beings and control them through
the screens and small through the
smartphones. I'm no match to them.
If I give them access, they they win.
Yeah. So, I try to limit their access.
In that way. In that way.
Yeah.
Her is also about the basic human need
understood, finding someone else who
totally gets you.
Um yeah, to feel loved. And I think
that's also the common thread in the
Australian Netflix series Please Like
Me.
Created, written, performed by uh Josh
Thomas. I absolutely love this series.
I I I watched it like four or five
times.
Cried my eyes out at the end. Um why did
it appeal to you?
Um
well, first of all, I think it's one of
the he's one of the funniest people on
the planet today. The main character and
the main character Josh Josh Thomas he
has a very unique sense of humor. It
gets It It
It takes time to grow on you. I mean, I
was the first time I watched the first
episode and closed the TV and thought
I'm not watching that. And after a
couple of weeks or months, I tried again
and gave it a chance and it it kind of
it takes time.
And
it's it's just such I I never saw
something like this on television.
It was just, you know, so real in a way.
And what makes it so real for you?
Um,
the the way that the people behave and
and
again and this kind of deep
existential sense of humor. It's not
like funny haha funny. It's I think very
kind of
uh, mixture going again back to Riley
when joy and sadness mix together and
you get a kind of this is really how how
life is. It's not like in the comedies.
It's a gray area. Yeah, and it's not
black and white. It's not haha or
laughing. It's everything combined.
Yeah, and we really see that in this in
this scene. We meet Josh at the zoo with
his mom Rose and her friend Hannah
and so there's Josh and then there's
cute Arnold in please like me.
So romantic.
Why did you choose this particular
scene?
Oh,
I like it very much that it's in a zoo.
It's kind of it's part of nature.
Um,
Wait, a zoo is part of nature? No, I
mean I I mean that what's happening
between them Yeah, okay. It's it's
natural. It's part of nature like the
meerkats and like this dolphin or
whatever
them getting kissing you mean? Yeah,
they're getting together, the romance
and we talked about you know, our deep
biological identity and you know, you
have all these rituals and you have
national rituals and religious rituals
and these rituals they are very shallow.
They go back you know, like 2,000 years,
5,000 years like I think about my bar
mitzvah. So people had for like 3,000
years top.
Now romance and your first kiss and like
having this click with somebody, this is
a biological drama, a biological ritual
which goes back tens of millions of
years.
And it's such a deep thing and it's like
your entire body is like some new button
is is being pressed. And
it's and then it connects everything we
talked about in about the previous
clips.
Like I came out as as gay when I was
almost 21.
Now Samantha, the AI from Her, she could
tell me that I was gay when I was I
don't know, 13 or 14. It should have
been written on my forehead but people
don't know themselves well. So I didn't
know.
I I I I still it's still one of the kind
of foundational insights I have about
human beings remembering myself at 15
that it should have been absolutely
obvious. Cuz you think coming out at age
21 is is quite late and I because I read
that you regretted coming out. It's not
so much about whether it's late or it's
I'm trying to how
how did I miss it? I think I'm a
intelligent person and you know, it was
So it was not that you stayed in the
closet for other people but you stayed
in the closet for yourself. You were
hiding from yourself.
Yes, and this ability of the mind not to
know something so deep, so important,
and again should have been so obvious.
This it's it's it's really mind-boggling
that we can do these things. And it also
connects to these stories that the
fictional stories, I mean, why does it
happen? So, one of the most basic
explanations is because, you know,
again, growing up in Israel in the
1980s, People would ask you when you
were going to get a girlfriend. Uh of
course, you almost you never hear about
gay people. If you hear anything, it's
always terrible things.
Like it's against nature, or it's
against God. Oh, and that's why you
found the zoo and the nature thing
important. Exactly. And then it take a
very long time to realize, "No, it's not
true. It's just a story that some people
invented 2,000 years ago."
Yeah, cuz basically what everything
humans do is nature.
Exactly. I mean, you can't break the
whole thing about homosexuality being
unnatural, it's a misunderstanding of
what nature means. You can never do
something unnatural. But it's just also
the stupid argument that people who hate
homosexuals in the first place use. It's
not a real They don't really think that
it's unnatural.
No, I mean, you have all these rabbis in
in in Israel that would go around and
say, "No, this is It's not just the
Bible, it's nature."
And um
I believed it to to some extent for many
years. And to understand that what
nature actually is, you cannot break the
laws of nature. The laws of nature are
not like the laws of a country that the
government has a rule that you can't
drive more than 90 km/h.
And I tried anyway. You drive 120, a
police officer stops you and gives you a
ticket. This is not how nature works.
That there is a rule against moving
faster than the speed of light, you do
it anyway, it's unnatural, so a galactic
police officer comes along and gives you
a ticket. No. And it doesn't work like
that with sex and romance.
If homosexuality was against nature, it
just couldn't exist. You know, things
against nature are for example driving
faster than the speed of light. You
don't need human rules against them,
they just can't happen.
It's impossible.
Yeah. So
go back cuz I love the way you explained
the feeling of getting your first kiss
as like a button being pressed and then
you feel it all all over. When when
do you do you want to tell me about your
first kiss?
such a good No, it wasn't a bad
experience, but it wasn't such a good
experience either.
it a bad kiss or what was Um
it was kind of an anticlimax. You hear
about it so much and again it's part of
the kind of the damage of being in the
closet for so long that you kind of you
you don't allow things to take the more
natural course.
And then, you know, all these characters
in the head that we saw in in in in
Riley, they get completely messed up.
And they are kind of tied in knots
within knots. It takes you years to
untangle these knots. So, what should
have been you know, a kind of playful
and wonderful and natural
uh uh ritual
or biological drama Mhm. gets this
complicated social, cultural, religious
toxic mix.
There was too much pressure. You you
yourself put too much pressure on it.
Yeah, too much conflicting expectations
and too much pressure and
misunderstandings and
uh you know, there was
after I came out, so there was a time
that I felt that finally I've solved it.
Like there was this one piece of the
puzzle in I don't understand life and
here I have this missing piece of the
puzzle. Yeah, but when did you realize
how did you realize you were gay at 21?
Was it
It was a process of a few a few months
and and and the movie also played a I
remember actually this one movie, maybe
I should have shown this.
It was 1997 and there was this film
festival in Jerusalem and there was this
movie called
a Canadian movie, French Lilies.
And it was kind of some had some had
very explicit gay scenes and I remember
walking out of the cinema and saying,
"I'm gay."
Let's Let's the kind of I mean it it
wasn't again we we this is mythology. We
embellish things when when we tell them
to make them simpler. It was a process
of of of several months.
But it's also a beautiful example of
what art can do to you, right?
Yeah, but it was a moment of of
crystallization.
But then it kind of you know, it was a
false enlightenment. Like I had a
feeling for some time that that's it. I
I had this whole life, this feeling that
I don't understand life and the social
system and what's going on and because I
missed this critical piece and now I
have it.
of life.
And yes. You said you cracked the puzzle
of your life of yourself.
Yes, and you know, everybody everybody
already did it because they are straight
and and they had it easy and now I I
finally cracked it. That's it. And it
took like one or two years to realize
now it it it was an important thing. It
was very good
but it's it it it's it didn't solve
everything.
There's still pieces missing.
There's still a lot of pieces missing.
Life is still messy.
And you mentioned the algorithm that
that an algorithm could have have told
you sooner that in fact you were gay.
Yeah, by You know, just watching what
happens to my eyes when I walk on the
beach in Haifa and there is a sexy guy
and a sexy girl walking hand in hand in
swimsuits. Where do my eyes go? I mean,
should have been very simple for an AI
to figure it out. But is that for you
a frightening future? Is it a positive
thing? Cuz I mean
It depends what we do with it. But, it
also depends where you live, right?
live in Iran
Yeah, then you're Yes, that's a
very problematic thing that you know
that they know about you even before you
do.
And that's the thing about hacking
humans. Throughout history
dictatorial governments always wanted to
hack human beings to be able to know
what you think, what you feel. You know,
Stalin gives a speech, everybody smiles
and claps their hands, but Stalin wants
to know what you really think.
they didn't have the technology
have the technology. Now, the technology
is there.
And it's not just it's it's all the
time. You know, again, in the Soviet
Union
the KGB couldn't follow you 24 hours a
day. They didn't have enough agents. And
even if they they had an agent on you,
the agent would write paper reports that
somebody a human being needs to read.
It's impossible to analyze all that.
Now, with AI and smartphones and sensors
and cameras and microphones and all
that, you can literally follow everybody
24 hours a day. You don't need human
agents. We carry the agent in our pocket
or whatever.
And you don't need human analysts to go
over the data. You have AI.
So, it's for the first time in history
it's possible to follow everybody all
the time and follow even what's
happening under the skin and to hack
humans.
Now, it's And to find out their
preferences, their secret loves, their
everything what you like to get to know
you better than you know yourself.
Yeah. But, ironically, science did help
you find love, right? Cuz I read that
you you met your husband through a
dating site. That's also an algorithm.
I I'm I'm not against technology. I
think that every technology can be used
for good or for bad. A knife can be used
to kill a person or to save a person's
life if you're a surgeon on an operating
table or to chop salad. Same goes for
for or
bat that you play baseball with. Yeah.
Exactly. So, again, I met my husband
online. I mean
who who who decided that he actually was
the one? Was that you or was that the
algorithm or was the algorithm in your
head?
it was me. I think that dating apps,
they have a misunderstanding. Most
dating apps, a misunderstanding of of of
humans.
Mm, too many dating apps
uh understood humans as consumers of
mates.
Like, you have the perfect mate out
there and the dating app just needs to
give you you you you you're a consumer
and this is a product you consume. So,
they bring you the product and you try
this one is is is is too dull and this
one is like this and give me another
product.
And this is an entire misconception.
Because humans are not consumers of
mates, they are producers of
relationships. The difficult part starts
after you meet the person. It's not
about meeting Mr. Right, it's about
doing the hard work of actually creating
a relationship, which is something an
app cannot do for you. The hard work you
have to do yourself is what you're
saying. Yeah. Yes. It's also funny how
you're avoiding the term soulmate in
this case cuz there's no such thing in
your world, right? Yeah, so, you know, I
mean, we need an app
to
help us create better relationships.
Because, you know, we need to change
ourselves. There is no Mr. Right, there
is no perfect person, but somebody who
is good enough and then to start the
real difficult work of building the
relationship.
There is no Mr. Right. Yeah. Yeah. And
again, it's it's it's it's something
very basic about
how technology treats us, whether it
kind of constricts us or whether it
gives us opportunities. I I watched
another interview with you where you
told that you I know you don't have
children and I heard you say in an
interview that you're you and your
husband are not planning to to have any.
Me, since ever since I was a young girl,
I always felt a calling deep from within
that I really really really wanted to
become a dog owner.
I never wanted kids either. It's never
crossed my mind. If I didn't know that
people have kids, I would never have
thought about it myself that somebody
would would do such a thing. Yeah, and
on the other hand, now and then, not
very often, I'm like, maybe am I missing
out on the only
possible meaning I feel that I don't
understand life in the world well enough
to take responsibility
for bringing somebody into this mess and
for being kind of you know, the
salesperson of life. Maybe I mean, if it
was easier to adopt, it's almost
impossible for gay guy couple to adopt
kids in in Israel.
If it was possible to adopt, then this
is an option, but just the possibility
that I'm totally responsible for
bringing somebody into this mess, which
I don't understand. If I understood it,
then okay.
And then also being perhaps totally
responsible for their death,
this is too much for me.
It's this is also a good example of the
puzzle, the pieces missing in the puzzle
and you not knowing
yeah, what mess you're bringing them
into. Yeah. Speaking of the mess we are
bringing children into, we started off
this evening, what was it? 700,000 years
ago with a clip from Once Upon a Time
Man and um you you wanted to show
another
Yes. clip from the same series, the
children cartoon series. We're
fast-forwarding to the past century.
And how it all ends.
It's always nice to end an interview on
a positive note.
Thank you for that.
Um Do you have anything to add or are
you going to leave us with it? No, I
think that this is a warning. Mhm. It's
not a prophecy.
Uh history is not a deterministic
like all your books, right? They're not
prophecies. They're
It's not all prophecies. We don't know
how the world will look like in 2050. It
depends on our actions.
We still have agency, we have power, we
have more power than really than ever
before. We sometimes just lack the
wisdom to use it in in the right way.
Yeah, the power of our imagination.
There's hope.
But we need to, you know We need to get
our act together.
to get our act together. But it's
totally within our power
to create a really good world.
Thank you so much for this interview.
Thank you. I really enjoyed it.
hope at the end of this
evening and I will never look the same
way to Game of Thrones and the Smurfs.
Never again. Thank you so much. Thank
you.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.